Research Article
Studies on Synthesis and Characterization of Fe3O4@SiO2@Ru Hybrid Magnetic Composites for Reusable Photocatalytic Application
Table 3
Comparison of photodegradation of MR using different photocatalysts.
| Photocatalysts | Preparation method | Light irradiated | Lamp power (W) | Catalyst dose | Irradiation time (min) | Degradation (%) | Ref. |
| Titania–alumina–zinc ferrite | Multistep wet chemical process | UV light | 8 W | 100 mg | 15 hrs | 90 | [75] | NiCo2O4 fibers | C-precipitation decomposition method | Visible light | 500 W xenon lamp | 0.12 g | 120 | 95 | [76] | TiO2 | Pechini method | UV light | 15 W mercury vapor lamp | 20 mg/L | 24 hrs | 89 | [77] | WO3 thin films | Chemical spray pyrolysis | Visible light | 500 W | 0.125 M | 160 | 97 | [78] | Fe3O4 NPs | Sonochemical | UV light | 8 W–Hg vapor lamp | 0.075 g/L | 60 | 60 | [79] | Cu2O/ZnO nanocomposite | Coprecipitation & thermal decomposition | Sunlight | Sunlight | 18 mg/L | 180 | 90 | [80] | Porous zinc hydroxide | Sol–gel | Visible light | 3 W white LED lamp | 2.5 g/L | 180 | 89 | [81] | CNT/ZnO nanocomposite | Sol-gel | Sunlight | Sun light | 20 mg/L | 30 | 80 | [82] | Fe3O4@SiO2@Ru HMNCs | Multistep wet chemical process | UV light | 8 W Hg lamp | 10 mg | 150 | 91 | PM |
|
|