Adsorption Characteristics and Electrochemical Behaviors of Methyl Blue onto Magnetic MgxCoyZn(1-x-y)Fe2O4 Nanoparticles

Lv, Zhixiang; Yang, Xin; Han, Jihong; Wang, Yingyao; Zou, Jiao; Yang, Anqi; Zhang, Haoda; He, Nan

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8803540

Adsorption Science & Technology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Results and Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 8803540 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8803540

Adsorption Characteristics and Electrochemical Behaviors of Methyl Blue onto Magnetic Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ Nanoparticles

Zhixiang Lv,¹Xin Yang,²Jihong Han,²Yingyao Wang,²Jiao Zou,²Anqi Yang,²Haoda Zhang,²and Nan He²

Academic Editor: Walid Oueslati

Received15 Sept 2022

Revised17 Apr 2023

Accepted04 May 2023

Published15 May 2023

Abstract

Magnetic Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles were successfully prepared by the rapid combustion approach, and SEM, XRD, VSM, EDX, and FTIR techniques were applied for their characterization. The influence of the element ratios (Mg²⁺, Co²⁺, and Zn²⁺) in magnetic Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles on their properties was explored. To acquire a larger specific surface area for better adsorption of methyl blue (MB), magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles calcined at 400°C for 2 h with 25 mL anhydrous ethanol were selected, and their average particle size and the saturation magnetization were about 81.3 nm and 13.5 emu·g^-1, respectively. Adsorption kinetics models and adsorption isotherm models were applied to research the adsorption characteristics of MB onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles. The pseudo-second-order kinetics model () and Temkin isotherm model () were the most consistent with the data, indicating that the adsorption was the chemical multilayer adsorption mechanism, and the process was an exothermic reaction. The E of the Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) isotherm model was 0.2347 KJ·mol^-1, indicating the adsorption involved physical adsorption besides chemical adsorption. The and ( KJ·mol^-1) of the adsorption process of MB adsorbed onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles measured through the thermodynamic experiment were both less than 0, which proved that the process was a spontaneous exothermic reaction. The adsorption capacity of MB onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles increased with the pH of MB solution increasing from 2 to 4 at room temperature, and it had no significant change when the pH of MB solution was 4-12, while the relative removal rate was 98.75% of the first one after 2 cycles. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and the cyclic voltammetry (CV) data further demonstrated that MB was adsorbed onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles.

1. Introduction

Dyes have been widely used in textiles, coatings, paint, plastic, and other industries which make people’s lives become colorful [1–6]. Meanwhile, environmental pollution has become increasingly serious owing to the discharge of a great deal of dye wastewater, especially, the nondegradable substances and aromatic and other organics of dyes that make the water eutrophication and absorbed by plants; many of them have serious harm to the environment and eventually enter the human body through the food chain that has a great threat to human health [7–11]. Hence, solving dye pollution has become a serious problem. Many methods of treating dye wastewater have been widely used, such as the membrane separation method [12, 13], photodegradation [14, 15], electrochemical oxidation method [16, 17], and adsorption method [18, 19]. Considering the low cost, no secondary pollution, recycling, and other influence factors, the adsorption method stands out from these methods [20–22].

The adsorbent is a key factor in the adsorption process, and many usual adsorbents, for instance, activated carbon [23], silica gel [24], resin [25], zeolite [26], and activated alumina [27], are applied to treat dye wastewater. With the development of nanotechnology, for larger specific surface area and high adsorption capacity, nanomaterials are applied for adsorption. Whereas, the difficult separation revealed the disadvantage of nanomaterials for adsorption. To solve the question, magnetic nanomaterials are used for adsorption, and they can be facilely separated from wastewater with an external magnetic field [28–31].

Many approaches can be applied for the preparations of magnetic nanomaterials, such as coprecipitation [32, 33], sol-gel [34], rapid combustion [35], and hydrothermal methods [36]. The coprecipitation method is easy to cause a high local concentration of solution owing to precipitant, leading to agglomeration [37]; and the sol-gel method has the disadvantages of a long preparation cycle and high cost [38], while the hydrothermal method has high requirements on the reaction temperature and pressure and has great safety risks [38]. Compared to these methods, the rapid combustion method has advantages such as low cost, a short preparation period, low equipment requirements, and other advantages.

Spinel ferrites (MFe₂O₄, M=Mg, Co, Zn, Cu, Ni, etc.) are a kind of magnetic nanomaterials which have been widely studied due to their unique magnetic properties and electrical resistances [39–41]. MgFe₂O₄, CoFe₂O₄, and ZnFe₂O₄ are often used as adsorbents. MgFe₂O₄ has high adsorption capacity and strong stability. Saturated magnetization and coercivity of MgFe₂O₄ could be improved by permeating Co into MgFe₂O₄ due to the saturated magnetization of CoFe₂O₄ being greater than MgFe₂O₄ [42, 43]. The specific surface area ratio of MgFe₂O₄ could be increased by permeating Zn into MgFe₂O₄ because ZnFe₂O₄ has a large specific surface area [44]. Although magnetic Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles have some advantages, they have not been widely applied because of their less mature technology.

In this work, magnetic Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles were successfully prepared by the rapid combustion approach, and MB was selected as the dye adsorption model which was a complex aromatic and typical anionic dye, the adsorption mechanism of MB onto Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles was investigated [1].

2. Experimental Detail

2.1. Materials

Absolute ethanol, ferric nitrate nonahydrate (Fe(NO₃)₃∙9H₂O, AR), cobalt nitrate hexahydrate (Co(NO₃)₂∙6H₂O, AR), magnesium nitrate hexahydrate (Mg(NO₃)₂∙6H₂O, AR), zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO₃)₂∙6H₂O, AR), and methyl blue (MB, BS) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China).

2.2. Preparation and Characteristic of Magnetic Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ Nanoparticles

The rapid combustion approach was employed to prepare magnetic Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles. At room temperature, Mg(NO₃)₂·6H₂O, Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O, Zn(NO₃)₂·6H₂O, Fe(NO₃)₃·9H₂O, and anhydrous ethanol (15 mL, 25 mL, 35 mL, 45 mL, 55 mL, and 100 mL) were added to a beaker according to the design ratio (x : y : (1-x-y) : 2). Then, the beaker was magnetically stirred until a homogeneous solution was formed. The homogeneous solution was moved to a crucible for combustion until the flame went out. Then, the crucible was placed in a calcinatory with programmed temperature controlling for calcination and ground after calcination.

The phase identification of magnetic Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ nanomaterials was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku D/max 2500 PCX), a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, HH-15, Physcience Opto-electronics Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), and the scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-TOOIF, JEOL Ltd., Japan) that were used to investigate their hysteresis loops and morphology, respectively; the energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was selected to analyze the corresponding element composition, and magnetic Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles were added to the milled KBr for grinding and analyzing their Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Nicolet Avatar, America) at 4000 cm^-1-400 cm^-1.

2.3. Adsorption Experiments of MB onto Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ Nanoparticles

To investigate the adsorption kinetics characteristics of MB onto Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles, each of 5 mg magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles was added into 2 mL MB solution (1900-2200 mg·L^-1, the gradient of 100 mg·L^-1) at room temperature and pH of 4, sonicated for 5 min and stirred for a corresponding time, then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 5 min. The absorbance of supernatant after centrifugation of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles was measured by ultraviolet spectrophotometer. To research the adsorption relationship of MB and magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles, similarly, each 5 mg magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles were added into 2 mL MB solution with various initial concentrations of 400-2200 mg·L^-1 and the gradient of 200 mg·L^-1 and kept for 24 h. Then, centrifuged and the supernatants were taken for measurements. To investigate the effect of MB solution temperature on the adsorption capacity of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles, the experimental steps of isotherm were repeated at 303 K, 313 K, and 323 K, respectively. To study the effect of pH on the adsorption capacity, 1 M NaOH solution and 1 M hydrochloric acid were used for accommodating the pH of MB solutions (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12), and the adsorption capacities under various pH values were examined under with 2000 mg·L^-1 of the initial MB solution. To investigate the adsorption reusability of MB onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles, 100 mg of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles were added to 40 mL MB solution (2000 mg·L^-1), and when the adsorption was finished, the magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles that adsorbed MB were separated and recalcined again at 400°C for 2 h, and the adsorption was repeated. Formula (1) was employed to calculate the adsorption capacity of Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles for MB [45]. where (mg·L^-1) and (mg·L^-1) were the initial concentration of MB and the concentration after adsorption, respectively. (g) was the weight of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles, and (L) was the volume of the MB solution.

2.4. Electrochemical Performances of MB onto Magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ Nanoparticles

To investigate the electrochemical changes for the adsorption process of MB onto Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles. At room temperature, 1 mg magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles and 1 mg magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles adsorbing MB were put into 100 μL ultrapure water to make suspension liquids, then ultrasound for 30 min, respectively. The two suspension liquids mentioned above of 8 μL were sucked and added onto the magnetic glassy carbon electrodes which were ground by alumina, respectively, and then dried to obtain the electrodes to be tested. Then, magnetic glassy carbon electrode, Ag/AgCl electrode, and platinum wire electrode were regarded as the working electrode, the reference electrode, and the counter electrode, respectively; 0.1 M KCl was used as the electrolyte which contained 5 mM [Fe(CN)₆]^3-/4-.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ Nanomaterials

Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ nanomaterials calcined at 400°C for 2 h with anhydrous ethanol of 25 mL were characterized as displayed in Figure 1. Figure 1(a) revealed the SEM morphology of Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ nanomaterials, and the acceleration voltage of SEM was 20 KV, and it was obvious that the Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ nanomaterials were spherical particles with the average grain diameter of 81.3 nm. The corresponding EDS spectrogram of Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles was displayed in Figure 1(b), and the proportions of all elements were consistent with the hypothesis before the experiment which proved the formation of Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles. The XRD pattern of Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles was revealed in Figure 1(c); the peaks corresponded with the standard PDF cards (JCPDS No. 73-1960, JCPDS No. 22-1086, JCPDS No. 73-1963) [46–48]. The cell parameters of Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles were , , and the volume of 590.99 Å³, which suggested that Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles were cubic type [49]. The hysteresis loops of Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles were shown in Figure 1(d), and the saturation magnetization (M_s) was 13.5 emu·g^-1, which contributed to being separated after adsorption.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.2. Optimum Preparation Conditions of Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ Nanoparticles

To acquire a larger specific surface area, the element ratios (Mg, Co, and Zn) of magnetic Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles were investigated, and their XRD patterns, average grain sizes, and the hysteresis loops of magnetic Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ ( and ) nanoparticles were shown in Figure S1(A-C), respectively. The wider and the lower the peak was, the lower the crystallinity was, the smaller the average grain diameter was, the larger the specific surface area of the nanomaterials was, and the better the adsorption efficiency of the nanomaterials was. It was obvious that the peak was the widest when was 0.5. The average grain size was calculated by the Scheller formula [50] and was 10.8-11.4 nm, and the average grain size was the smallest when was 0.5. With the increase of Co content and the decrease of Zn content, the saturation magnetization generally presented a rising trend, the reason for which was that the saturation magnetization of CoFe₂O₄ was higher than that of ZnFe₂O₄ [51]. The XRD patterns, average grain diameter, and the hysteresis loops of magnetic Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ ( and ) nanoparticles were revealed in Figure S1(D-F), respectively. It was obvious that the peak was the widest when was 0.4. The average grain diameter decreased from 10.8 nm () to 10.0 nm (), indicating that the average grain diameter of magnetic Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles had a strong dependence on the content of Zn. Because the value of MgFe₂O₄ was lower than that of ZnFe₂O₄, the value of magnetic Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles decreased gradually with the increase of Mg content [52]. Hence, the magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles with a larger saturation magnetization were selected to investigate the property and employed to adsorb MB.

The influences of anhydrous ethanol volume and calcination temperature on magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles were investigated. The XRD patterns, average grain diameter, and the hysteresis loops of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles calcined at different temperatures for 2 h with 25 mL anhydrous ethanol were displayed in Figure S2(A-C), respectively. It was obvious that the peak of the calcination temperature at 400°C was the widest. While, with the calcination temperature increasing from 400°C to 800°C, the diffraction peak intensity of 35.57° gradually increased, and the average grain diameter increased from 10.0 nm to 30.1 nm. The calcination temperature had a larger influence on the average grain size. The reason was that the sintering degree was getting better with the increase in calcination temperature. The value of nanoparticles was related to their average grain diameter. The value increased with the increase of calcination temperature, and the same trend was shown in average particle size. The reason was that magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles formed more easily at a higher temperature. The XRD patterns, average grain diameter, and the hysteresis loops of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles prepared at 400°C for 2 h with various dosages of anhydrous ethanol were displayed in Figure S2(D-F), respectively. The average grain size decreased with the dosage of anhydrous ethanol increasing from 15 mL to 25 mL. However, it increased with the dosage of anhydrous ethanol increasing from 25 mL to 100 mL. The reason was that the crystalline grain did not form when the dosage of anhydrous ethanol was 15 mL. And the higher the dosage of anhydrous ethanol was, the better the sintering degree was. The maximum saturation magnetization of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles reached 69.52 emu·g^-1 when anhydrous ethanol was 45 mL. To adsorb more MB and for easy separation, after comprehensive consideration, the calcination temperature of 400°C and the absolute ethanol dosage of 25 mL were the best optimums for preparing magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles.

3.3. Adsorption Characteristics of MB onto Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ Nanoparticles

3.3.1. Adsorption Kinetics

The relationships between different initial concentrations of MB solution and the adsorption capacities of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles were shown in Figure 2; the adsorption capacity of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles for MB increased gradually with the increase of initial MB concentration. The reason was that the adsorption sites of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles were much more than the required adsorption sites of MB in the solution with the low initial concentration of MB, and MB was adsorbed onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles and reached saturation soon. And the required adsorption sites of MB augmented with the increase of initial MB concentration; most of the adsorption sites of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles were rapidly occupied by MB, and the adsorption rate gradually decreased. Magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles had a large number of effective adsorption sites in a short adsorption time. With the extension of the adsorption time, the effective adsorption sites decreased, and the adsorption rate gradually decreased until it stabilized, which reached the maximum saturated adsorption capacity.

Three frequently used kinetics models, pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and intraparticle models [53–55], were applied to investigate the adsorption process of MB onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles. Equations (2)–(4) of the pseudo-first-order model, pseudo-second-order model, and intraparticle model were as follows: where (mg·g^-1) and (mg·g^-1) were the adsorption capacity of MB adsorbed onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles at time and equilibrium time, respectively. , , and were the rate constants of pseudo-first-order model, pseudo-second-order model, and intraparticle model, respectively. was the thickness of the adsorbed boundary layer. The kinetics fitting curves of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles with various initial concentrations of MB and different adsorption times were shown in Figure 3. Obviously, the experimental data conformed to the pseudo-second-order kinetics model. The closer the correlation coefficient () was to 1, the more consistent the fitting curve was with the experimental data. Table 1 reveals that the values of pseudo-second-order kinetics models were greater than 0.99, indicating that the adsorption of MB onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles was chemical adsorption. The chemisorption mechanism might affect its adsorption rate due to electron transfer between adsorbents and adsorbates [56].

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

The rate-limiting steps of methyl blue adsorption on nanoparticles were determined by the intraparticle diffusion model. As could be seen from Figure 4, the curve presented multilinearity and did not pass through the origin, indicating that intraparticle diffusion was not the only rate-limiting step. The adsorption process of MB onto Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ was roughly divided into three stages. The first stage was the surface adsorption process of Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles, namely, MB diffusion adsorption on the surface of Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles. The second stage was the diffusion process within the Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticle, which was the process of MB diffusion into the nanoparticles, and the third stage was the process of slow adsorption to adsorption equilibrium. The results showed that the control steps of the adsorption process of MB onto Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ were carried out through the coupling of external diffusion and internal diffusion [57–59].

3.3.2. Adsorption Isotherms

The adsorption isotherm was used to investigate the interaction between MB and magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles. The experimental data were fitted with the Langmuir model, Freundlich model, Temkin model, and D-R model, respectively, as displayed in Figure 5. The Langmuir model assumed that monolayer adsorption on uniformly distributed adsorbent at active sites [60]. The Freundlich model assumed that multilayer adsorption was performed on heterogeneous surfaces [61]. The Temkin model assumed that monolayer and multilayer adsorption was performed on heterogeneous surfaces [62]. The D-R model assumed that adsorption was related to surface porosity and pore volume. D-R isotherm models examined adsorption in terms of energy to determine physical or chemisorption processes [63]. Equations (5)–(9) of the isotherms were as follows: where (mg·g^-1) and (mg·g^-1) were the adsorption equilibrium capacity and maximum adsorption capacity of MB adsorbed onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles, respectively. (mg·L^-1) was the equilibrium concentration. and were the rate constant of the Langmuir model and Freundlich model, respectively. and were constants of the Temkin isotherm model. was a constant related to the adsorption energy, and (KJ·mol^-1) was the mean adsorption energy. The relevant parameters of the isotherm models were listed in Table 2. The correlation coefficients () of the Langmuir model, Freundlich model, and Temkin model were 0.9859, 0.9665, and 0.9887, respectively, and the of the Temkin model was greater than that of the Langmuir and Freundlich models, indicating that the Temkin model was fitter for explaining the adsorption relationship between MB and magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles. The adsorption of MB onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles was a monolayer and multilayer chemical adsorption mechanism. Moreover, of the Temkin model was positive, indicating that the adsorption was an exothermic reaction [64–66].

D-R isothermal model was employed to calculate the average adsorption energy. When KJ·mol^-1, the physical adsorption occurred; when 8 KJ· KJ·mol^-1, the chemisorption occurred. When KJ·mol^-1, the ion exchange occurred. It could be seen from Table 2 that of the adsorption process of MB onto Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles was 0.2347 KJ·mol^-1, which was less than 8 KJ·mol^-1, indicating that physical adsorption existed in the adsorption process. In conclusion, physical and chemical adsorption both existed in the adsorption process of MB onto Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles [67].

Table 3 showed the maximum adsorption capacities of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles and other adsorbents for MB. The adsorption capacity of MB adsorbed onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles was more than those of other adsorbents. The reason for the better adsorption capacity of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles might be that magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles with positive charge may have electrostatic adsorption with MB and their surface was rich in hydroxyl groups. Moreover, magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles had the advantages of facile preparation and easy separation after adsorption with an external magnetic field, indicating that magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles had a wide application prospect in wastewater treatment.

3.3.3. Thermodynamic Study

The effect of MB solution temperature on the adsorption capacity of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles was studied to verify the spontaneity of the process [68]. Equations (10)–(12) were used to calculate the thermodynamic parameters (, , and ). where was the distribution coefficient, (8.314 J·mol^-1) was the gas constant, and was the Kelvin temperature. The values of and were calculated using the slope and intercept of the and 1/T curves. The relationship between and 1/T was shown in Figure 6, and it was obvious that had a good linear relationship with 1/T. , , and were shown in Table 4, and was -10.38 KJ·mol^-1; the result showed that the adsorption of MB onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles was an exothermic process. was less than 0 KJ·mol^-1, indicating that the process was a spontaneous reaction process. The thermodynamic experiment proved that the adsorption process of MB adsorbed onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles was a spontaneous exothermic reaction.

3.4. Adsorption Mechanism of MB onto Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ Nanoparticles

3.4.1. FTIR Analysis

The FTIR spectra of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles, MB, magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles after adsorption, and magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticle-adsorbed recalcination were shown in Figure 7. The Fe-O bond appeared at 578 cm^-1, the O-H bond appeared at 3423 cm^-1 which belonged to H₂O, and the -SO₃Na bond appeared at 1031 cm^-1, indicating that MB was adsorbed onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles [1]. As shown in Figure 7 (D), after magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles were recalcined, most of the MB characteristic peaks disappeared, but the peak of 1124 cm^-1 appeared as a wide peak, indicating that MB was removed during the process of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles recalcination and MB was adsorbed onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles utilizing chemical bonding. Hence, the calcined of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles had an obvious adsorption effect and regeneration.

3.4.2. Influence of pH and Cycle Number

The pH of the MB solution had a great influence on the adsorption capacity of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles. Figure 8(a) showed that the adsorption capacity of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles increased rapidly with the pH of MB increasing from 2 to 4. The adsorption capacity of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles did not change significantly when the pH of MB increased from 4 to 12, and the saturated adsorption capacity of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles increased from 792.42 mg·g^-1 to 797.73 mg·g^-1. The reason was that the isoelectric point of MB was 4. MB and the magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles of the surface had a positive charge, and when pH was less than 4, with the pH increasing, the positive charge on the surface of MB decreased gradually, and the adsorption capacity gradually increased. The number of negative charges of MB was equal to the positive charges of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles when the pH of MB solution was in 4-12, and the applied force between MB and magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles canceled out.

(a)

(b)

Cycle number was an important index to evaluate an adsorbent. Common regeneration methods included calcination regeneration, chemical regeneration, and biological regeneration. The retention of chemical solvents on the adsorbent and the residual of biological intermediates on the adsorbent would hinder the adsorption of pollutants on the adsorbent in subsequent cycles, and the regeneration efficiency would be significantly reduced after multiple cycles [69]. In contrast, the calcination method was the most widely used and the most mature regeneration method with simple operation and high regeneration efficiency. Therefore, the regeneration of Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles adsorbing MB was completed by calcination.

Figure 8(b) showed that the removal rate of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles could still reach 98.75% of the first after 2 cycles. But the removal rate decreased significantly after 3 cycles, only 64.17% of the first. The reason was that with the cycle number increasing, the number of calcinations increased, and the collapse of adsorption voids of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles resulted in the decrease of specific surface area; the adsorption sites decreased, and the adsorption effect deteriorated. The result suggested that magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles had good reusability.

The characterization of the recycled Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles after calcination was shown in Figure 9. According to Figure 9(a), compared to fresh Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles, the XRD of calcined nanoparticles had lower diffraction peaks. It could be seen from Figures 9(a) and 9(c) that the morphology of calcined Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles had not changed obviously. All these characterizations indicated that Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles had excellent cyclic properties.

(a)

(b)

(c)

3.4.3. Electrochemical of MB onto Magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ Nanoparticles

CV was used to investigate the change of electrical signals interacting with magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles. The CV curves of bare MGCE, MGCE/Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄, and MGCE/Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄/MB scanned between -0.1 V and 0.7 V were shown in Figure 10(a). The peak value of current decreased significantly when magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles were added to the electrode, and the reason was that magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles obstructed the flow of [Fe(CN)₆]^3-/4- to the surface of the electrode. The peak value of current was further reduced when magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles adsorbing MB were added to the electrode, and the reason was that the interaction between MB and magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles further obstructed the flow of [Fe(CN)₆]^3-/4- to the surface of the electrode.

(a)

(b)

EIS was a method to study charge transfer characteristics at the electrode interface. The Nyquist plot was a semicircular curve not centered on the real axis, and this kind of decentralization belonged to the non-Debye type relaxation process [70]. The Nyquist plot of bare MGCE (a), MGCE/Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ (b), and MGCE/Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄/MB (c) was shown in Figure 10(b). The size of the sample resistance was determined by the diameter of the semicircle. Magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticle suspension was dropped onto the bare electrode, and the radius of the curve increased after magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles were added to the electrode. Comparing Figure 10(b) C with Figure 10(b) B, the radius of the circle increased further. The results indicated that MB adsorbed onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles further increased the resistance. The electrochemical analysis further verified that MB was adsorbed onto magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles.

4. Conclusion

(1)Magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles were successfully prepared by the rapid combustion approach. The average particle size and the magnetic saturation intensity of the nanoparticles calcined at 400°C for 2 h with 25 mL anhydrous ethanol were 81.28 nm and 13.5 emu·g^-1, respectively(2)The adsorption of MB onto Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles conformed to the pseudo-second-order model and Freundlich model, indicating that the adsorption process was a chemical multilayer adsorption mechanism. The D-R model indicated that the adsorption involved physical adsorption. Adsorption thermodynamics and the Temkin model demonstrated that the adsorption process was a spontaneous exothermic reaction(3)The adsorption capacity of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles reached 792.42 mg·g^-1 when pH was 4, and the removal rate of magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles could still reach 98.75% of the first after 2 cycles, indicating that magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles had good application value

Data Availability

The research data used to support the finding of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version (Supplementary Materials). (Supplementary Materials)

References

S. Xie, Y. Yang, W. Z. Gai, and Z. Y. Deng, “Oxide modified aluminum for removal of methyl orange and methyl blue in aqueous solution,” RSC Advances, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 867–875, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Q. Hu, C. Hou, J. An et al., “Fe₃O₄-doped silk fibroin-polyacrylamide hydrogel for selective and highly efficient absorption of cationic dyes pollution in water,” Nanotechnology, vol. 33, no. 26, article 265601, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ghedjemis, R. Ayeche, M. Kebaili, A. Benouadah, and L. F. Gil, “Application of natural hydroxyapatite in the treatment of polluted water: utilization of dromedary bone as bioadsorbent,” International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 2124–2134, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Shu, W. Qiu, M. Luo, and L. Xiao, “Morphology-controlled hydrothermal synthesis of copper selenides with orange juice for highly efficient cationic dyes adsorption,” Materials Today Sustainability, vol. 17, article 100094, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Hayati, N. M. Mahmoodi, M. Arami, and F. Mazaheri, “Dye removal from colored textile wastewater by poly(propylene imine) dendrimer: operational parameters and isotherm studies,” Clean: Soil, Air, Water, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 673–679, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. M. Mahmoodi, M. Ghezelbash, M. Shabanian, F. Aryanasab, and M. R. Saeb, “Efficient removal of cationic dyes from colored wastewaters by dithiocarbamate-functionalized graphene oxide nanosheets: from synthesis to detailed kinetics studies,” Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, vol. 81, pp. 239–246, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. J. Chen, Y. L. Zhao, Q. H. Xie, C. Y. Liang, and Z. Y. Zong, “Polyethyleneimine grafted starch nanocrystals as a novel biosorbent for efficient removal of methyl blue dye,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 273, article 118579, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Heo, L. L. An, J. S. Chen, J. H. Bae, and Y. S. Kim, “Preparation of amine-functionalized lignins for the selective adsorption of methylene blue and Congo red,” Chemosphere, vol. 295, article 133815, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Nazir, T. Najam, M. S. Bashir et al., “Kinetics, “isothermal and mechanistic insight into the adsorption of eosin yellow and malachite green from water via tri-metallic layered double hydroxide nanosheets”,” Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 216–226, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Mousavi, M. Asghari, and N. M. Mahmoodi, “Chitosan-wrapped multiwalled carbon nanotube as filler within PEBA thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membrane to improve dye removal,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 237, article 116128, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Moradihamedani, “Recent advances in dye removal from wastewater by membrane technology: a review,” Polymer Bulletin, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 2603–2631, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhang, M. Xu, M. N. Chen et al., “Fabrication of high flux porphrin-cored with siloxane-poly(amido amine) dendrimer/PVDF composite membrane for oil/water separation and dye degradation,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 10, no. 3, article 107634, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Gu, T. Y. Chen, P. Xiao et al., “Constructing oxidized carbon spheres-based heterogeneous membrane with high surface energy for energy-free water purification,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 431, article 134132, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. S. Mona, J. Fattaneh, and D. Abdulhamid, “The study of TiO₂/Cu₂O nanoparticles as an efficient nanophotocalyst toward surface adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue,” Applied Nanoscience, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 2195–2205, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. H. Y. S. L. Zhu, L. H. Zhang, and S. Watanabe, “Mesoporous single crystal titanium oxide microparticles for enhanced visible light photodegradation,” Optical Materials, vol. 127, article 112297, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. S. Hirpara and U. D. Patel, “Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for color and COD removal for some dyes subjected to electrochemical oxidation,” Environmental Technology, vol. 43, pp. 1–12, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Hou, X. Li, Y. T. Yan, and L. Z. Wang, “Electrochemical oxidation of methyl orange in an active carbon packed electrode reactor (ACPER): degradation performance and kinetic simulation,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 8, p. 4775, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mahreni, R. R. Ramadhan, M. F. Pramadhana, A. P. Permatasari, D. Kurniawati, and H. S. Kusuma, “Synthesis of metal organic framework (MOF) based Ca-alginate for adsorption of malachite green dye,” Polymer Bulletin, vol. 79, no. 12, pp. 11301–11315, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. M. Mahmoodi, M. Oveisi, M. Bakhtiari et al., “Environmentally friendly ultrasound-assisted synthesis of magnetic zeolitic imidazolate framework - graphene oxide nanocomposites and pollutant removal from water,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, vol. 282, pp. 115–130, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. F. Liu, Y. Y. Shi, Y. Cui, F. Zhao, and M. D. Chen, “Design and preparation of imidazole ionic liquid-based magnetic polymers and its adsorption on sunset yellow dye,” Materials, vol. 15, no. 7, p. 2628, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yang, Y. Sun, Q. Zhang et al., “ZrMO_X particles for enhanced removal of methyl orange from wastewater: preparation, characterization, and adsorption study,” Adsorption Science & Technology, vol. 2022, article 9685352, pp. 1–11, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Almasian, M. E. Olya, and N. M. Mahmoodi, “Preparation and adsorption behavior of diethylenetriamine/polyacrylonitrile composite nanofibers for a direct dye removal,” Fibers and Polymers, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1925–1934, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. M. Bakhsh, M. Bilal, M. Ali et al., “Synthesis of activated carbon from Trachycarpus fortunei seeds for the removal of cationic and anionic dyes,” Materials, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 1986, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Chirsty and P. Sivarukshy, “Comparison of adsorption properties of commercial silica and rice husk ash (RHA) silica: a study by NIR spectroscopy,” Open Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 426–431, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Y. Duan, Z. F. Cao, H. Zhong, X. Ma, and S. Wang, “Highly efficient poly(6-acryloylamino-N-hydroxyhexanamide) resin for adsorption of heavy metal ions,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 308, article 114631, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. I. Lee and P. S. Lee, “Zeolite adsorbents for the separation of n-butyric acid from fermentation broths via adsorption,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 334, article 111768, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mahinroosta and A. Allahverdi, “Pilot-scale valorization of hazardous aluminum dross into γ-Al2O3 nanoadsorbent for efficient removal of fluoride,” Environmental Technology and Innovation, vol. 23, article 101549, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Sanchez, E. Espinosa, P. M. Zelis, R. M. Martín, J. D. H. Niza, and A. Rodríguez, “Cellulose nanofibers/PVA blend polymeric beads containing in-situ prepared magnetic nanorods as dye pollutants adsorbents,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 209, no. Part A, pp. 1211–1221, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. M. Alzahrani, N. S. Alsaiari, K. M. Katubi, A. Amari, F. B. Rebah, and M. A. Tahoon, “Synthesis of polymer-based magnetic nanocomposite for multi-pollutants removal from water,” Polymers, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 1742, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Janani, B. Gurunathan, K. Sivakumar, S. Varjani, H. H. Ngo, and E. Gnansounou, “Advancements in heavy metals removal from effluents employing nano-adsorbents: way towards cleaner production,” Environmental Research, vol. 203, article 111815, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Li, S. P. Kuang, Y. Kang, H. Q. Ma, J. H. Dong, and Z. Z. Guo, “Recent advances in application of iron-manganese oxide nanomaterials for removal of heavy metals in the aquatic environment,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 819, article 153157, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Mao, Y. Li, Z. H. Guo et al., “The coprecipitation formation study of iron oxide nanoparticles with the assist of a gas/liquid mixed phase fluidic reactor,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 647, article 129107, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Moreira and D. Grasseschi, “Automation of a low-cost device for flow synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 24, no. 5, p. 93, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. N. Pinotti, L. M. D. Souza, W. P. Marques et al., “A new magnetic composite with potential application in boron adsorption: development, characterization, and removal tests,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 277, article 125368, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Chen, Z. Wang, and Z. X. Lv, “Adsorption of reactive red 2BF onto Ni_0.3Co_0.2Zn_0.5Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles fabricated via the ethanol solution of nitrate combustion process,” Materials Research Express, vol. 8, no. 1, article 015006, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. S. Mohamed, N. M. A. Hadia, B. A. Bakheet, M. Alzaid, and A. M. Abu-Dief, “Impact of Cu²⁺ cations substitution on structural, morphological, optical and magnetic properties of Co_1-xCu_xFe₂O₄ nanoparticles synthesized by a facile hydrothermal approach,” Solid State Sciences, vol. 125, article 106841, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ni, J. Wang, J. Ma et al., “Synthesis of yttria nanopowder with poly acrylic acid as dispersant for highly transparent yttria ceramics,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 2029–2037, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. T. Liu, Z. X. Luo, J. X. Yang et al., “Synthesis of non-agglomerating submicron/nano-Yb₂Si₂O₇ powders by a carbon-coated coprecipitation method,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 5548–5554, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Murugesan, L. Okrasa, K. Ugendar et al., “Improved magnetic and electrical properties of Zn substituted nanocrystalline MgFe₂O₄ ferrite,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 550, article 169066, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Yalcin, S. Ozcelik, K. Icin, K. Senturk, B. Ozcelik, and L. Arda, “Structural, optical, magnetic, photocatalytic activity and related biological effects of CoFe₂O₄ ferrite nanoparticles,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 13068–13080, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Dojcinovic, Z. Z. Vasiljevic, V. P. Pavlovic et al., “Mixed Mg-Co spinel ferrites: structure, morphology, magnetic and photocatalytic properties,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 855, article 157429, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Magdalane, G. M. A. Priyadharsini, K. Kaviyarasu, A. IrudayaJothi, and G. G. Simiyon, “Synthesis and characterization of TiO₂ doped cobalt ferrite nanoparticles via microwave method: investigation of photocatalytic performance of Congo red degradation dye,” Surfaces and Interfaces, vol. 25, article 101296, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. R. Araújo, S. Araujo-Barbosa, A. L. R. Souza et al., “Tuning structural, magnetic, electrical, and dielectric properties of MgFe₂O₄ synthesized by sol-gel followed by heat treatment,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 154, article 110051, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Alsayed, M. S. Badawi, and R. Awad, “Investigation of thermal and mechanical behavior of HDPE/ZnFe₂O₄ composite,” Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 2757–2765, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. He, H. F. Tian, A. M. Xiang, S. B. Ma, D. Y. Yin, and A. V. Rajulu, “Fabrication of PVA/GO nanofiber films by electrospinning: application for the adsorption of Cu²⁺ and organic dyes,” Journal of Polymers and the Environment, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 2964–2975, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. K. Heiba, M. A. Deyab, and A. M. El-naggar, “Electrochemical performance of quaternary (1-x)ZnMn₂O₄/(x)MgFe₂O₄ solid solution as supercapacitor electrode,” Ceramics International, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 7475–7486, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Dabas, M. Chahar, and O. P. Thakur, “Electromagnetic interference shielding properties of CoFe₂O₄/polyaniline/poly(vinylidene fluoride) nanocomposites,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 278, article 125579, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Fei, F. Ali, A. Said et al., “Surface-functionalized spongy zinc ferrite as a robust visible-light driven nanocatalyst for wastewater remediation: characterization, kinetic, and mechanistic insight,” International journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1007–1018, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. Nguyen, C. C. Chu, A. K. Anbalagan, C. H. Lee, and C. S. Chang, “Rietveld refinement and X-ray absorption study on the bonding states of lanthanum-based perovskite-type oxides La_1-xCe_xCoO₃,” Crystals, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 50, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Gupta, K. Kumar, S. H. Saeed et al., “Influence of tin doping on the liquefied petroleum gas and humidity sensing properties of NiO nanoparticles,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 369–379, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Chitra, E. R. Kumar, T. Pushpagiri, and A. Steephen, “Size and phase purity-dependent microstructural and magnetic properties of spinel ferrite nanoparticles,” Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1239–1244, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Gabal and A. A. Al-Juaid, “Structural and electromagnetic studies of Mg_1-xZn_xFe₂O₄ nanoparticles synthesized via a sucrose autocombustion route,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 31, no. 13, pp. 10055–10071, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Azouaou, H. Mokaddem, O. Allalou, N. Boudechiche, and Z. Sadaoui, “Synergistic effect of cafeterias and domestic wastes for the removal of lead from aqueous solution,” Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 403–424, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. S. Yadav and S. Dasgupta, “Effect of time, pH, and temperature on kinetics for adsorption of methyl orange dye into the modified nitrate intercalated MgAl LDH adsorbent,” Inorganic Chemistry Communications, vol. 137, article 109203, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Hassan, A. Shahat, I. M. El-Deen, M. A. M. El-Afify, and M. A. El-Bindary, “Synthesis and characterization of NH₂-MIL-88(Fe) for efficient adsorption of dyes,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 1258, article 132662, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yu, X. D. Li, M. Wu et al., “Synergistic role of inherent calcium and iron minerals in paper mill sludge biochar for phosphate adsorption,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 834, article 155193, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Balarak, M. Zafariyan, C. A. Igwegbe, K. K. Onyechi, and J. O. Ighalo, “Adsorption of acid blue 92 dye from aqueous solutions by single-walled carbon nanotubes: isothermal, kinetic, and thermodynamic studies,” Environmental Processes, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 869–888, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. J. Al-Musawi, P. Rajiv, N. Mengelizadeh, I. A. Mohammed, and D. Balarak, “Development of sonophotocatalytic process for degradation of acid orange 7 dye by using titanium dioxide nanoparticles/graphene oxide nanocomposite as a catalyst,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 292, article 112777, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Guo, Y. Zhao, G. S. Qi, and Y. Z. Liu, “Performance and mechanism of gas-solid adsorption in a rotating adsorption bed,” Chemical Engineering and Technology, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 844–852, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Almethen, K. M. Alotaibi, H. S. Alhumud, and A. M. Alswieleh, “Highly efficient and rapid removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution using folic acid-conjugated dendritic mesoporous silica nanoparticles,” PRO, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 705, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. T. Kapoor, M. Rafatullah, M. R. Siddiqui, M. A. Khan, and M. Sillanpää, “Removal of reactive black 5 dye by banana peel biochar and evaluation of its phytotoxicity on tomato,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 7, p. 4176, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. T. Yin, S. S. Zhang, Y. Y. Xu, J. M. Xue, J. Q. Bi, and R. J. Liu, “Adsorption mechanism and electrochemical properties of methyl blue onto magnetic Co_xCu_(1-x)Fe₂O₄ nanoparticles prepared via an alcohol solution of nitrate combustion and calcination process,” Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 3584–3594, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ghaly, M. R. Abass, and Z. A. Mekawy, “Performance of molybdenum vanadate loaded on bentonite for retention of cesium-134 from aqueous solutions,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 30, no. 21, pp. 60432–60446, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. M. Adedeji and K. Jahan, “Removal of pollutants from aqueous product of co-hydrothermal liquefaction: adsorption and isotherm studies,” Chemosphere, vol. 321, article 138165, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. D. Khatibi, M. Yilmaz, A. H. Mahvi, D. Balarak, and S. Salehi, “Evaluation of surfactant-modified bentonite for acid red 88 dye adsorption in batch mode: kinetic, equilibrium, and thermodynamic studies,” Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 271, pp. 48–57, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. K. Mostafapour, A. H. Mahvi, A. D. Khatibi, M. K. Saloot, N. Mohammadzadeh, and D. Balarak, “Adsorption of lead(II) using bioadsorbent prepared from immobilized Gracilaria corticata algae: thermodynamics, kinetics and isotherm analysis,” Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 265, pp. 103–113, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. K. Mostafapour, M. Yilmaz, A. H. Mahvi, A. Younesi, F. Ganji, and D. Balarak, “Adsorptive removal of tetracycline from aqueous solution by surfactant-modified zeolite: equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics,” Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 247, pp. 216–228, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. M. Valadi, S. Shahsavari, E. Akbarzadeh, and M. R. Gholami, “Preparation of new MOF-808/chitosan composite for Cr(VI) adsorption from aqueous solution: experimental and DFT study,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 288, article 119383, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Y. Ying, G. Kim, I. Han, J. Y. Sheng, Q. W. Mei, and Y. Kim, “High efficiency regeneration performance of exhausted activated carbon by superheated steam and comparison with conventional chemical regeneration method,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 2058–2067, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Dabbebi, S. Hcini, B. Alzahrani et al., “Investigations of microstructural and impedance spectroscopic properties of Mg_0.5Co_0.5Fe_1.6Al_0.4O₄ ferrite prepared using sol-gel method,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 12521–12534, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. W. Shi, G. B. Song, A. Q. Li et al., “Graphene oxide-chitosan composite aerogel for adsorption of methyl orange and methylene blue: effect of pH in single and binary systems,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 641, article 128595, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Yang, Y. F. Zhan, Y. J. Gong et al., “Development of eco-friendly CO₂-responsive cellulose nanofibril aerogels as “green” adsorbents for anionic dyes removal,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 405, article 124194, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. He, W. L. Bao, Y. C. Hua et al., “Efficient adsorption of methyl orange and methyl blue dyes by a novel triptycene-based hyper-crosslinked porous polymer,” RSC Advances, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 5587–5594, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Deb, M. Z. Islam, A. Ahmed et al., “Kinetics & dynamic studies of dye adsorption by porous graphene nano-adsorbent for facile toxic wastewater remediation,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 47, article 102818, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Zhixiang Lv et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

415

Downloads

262

Citations

Adsorption Science & Technology

Adsorption Characteristics and Electrochemical Behaviors of Methyl Blue onto Magnetic MgxCoyZn(1-x-y)Fe2O4 Nanoparticles

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Experimental Detail

2.1. Materials

2.2. Preparation and Characteristic of Magnetic MgxCoyZn(1-x-y)Fe2O4 Nanoparticles

2.3. Adsorption Experiments of MB onto Mg0.4Co0.5Zn0.1Fe2O4 Nanoparticles

2.4. Electrochemical Performances of MB onto Magnetic Mg0.4Co0.5Zn0.1Fe2O4 Nanoparticles

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Magnetic Mg0.4Co0.5Zn0.1Fe2O4 Nanomaterials

3.2. Optimum Preparation Conditions of MgxCoyZn(1-x-y)Fe2O4 Nanoparticles

3.3. Adsorption Characteristics of MB onto Mg0.4Co0.5Zn0.1Fe2O4 Nanoparticles

3.3.1. Adsorption Kinetics

3.3.2. Adsorption Isotherms

3.3.3. Thermodynamic Study

3.4. Adsorption Mechanism of MB onto Mg0.4Co0.5Zn0.1Fe2O4 Nanoparticles

3.4.1. FTIR Analysis

3.4.2. Influence of pH and Cycle Number

3.4.3. Electrochemical of MB onto Magnetic Mg0.4Co0.5Zn0.1Fe2O4 Nanoparticles

4. Conclusion

Data Availability

Conflicts of Interest

Supplementary Materials

References

Copyright

Adsorption Characteristics and Electrochemical Behaviors of Methyl Blue onto Magnetic Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ Nanoparticles

2.2. Preparation and Characteristic of Magnetic Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ Nanoparticles

2.3. Adsorption Experiments of MB onto Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ Nanoparticles

2.4. Electrochemical Performances of MB onto Magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ Nanoparticles

3.1. Characterization of Magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ Nanomaterials

3.2. Optimum Preparation Conditions of Mg_xCo_yZn_(1-x-y)Fe₂O₄ Nanoparticles

3.3. Adsorption Characteristics of MB onto Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ Nanoparticles

3.4. Adsorption Mechanism of MB onto Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ Nanoparticles

3.4.3. Electrochemical of MB onto Magnetic Mg_0.4Co_0.5Zn_0.1Fe₂O₄ Nanoparticles