Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Urology
Volume 2008, Article ID 524392, 3 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/524392
Research Article

A Preliminary Report on Combined Penoscrotal and Perineal Approach for Placement of Penile Prosthesis with Corporal Fibrosis

1Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente-Bellflower Medical Center, 9400 East Rosecrans Avenue, Bellflower, CA 90706, USA
2Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente-Los Angeles Medical Center, 4867 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA

Received 2 May 2008; Revised 12 August 2008; Accepted 9 October 2008

Academic Editor: Miroslav L. Djordjevic

Copyright © 2008 John P. Brusky et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. O. Shaeer and A. Shaeer, “Corporoscopic excavation of the fibrosed corpora cavernosa for penile prosethesis implantation: optical corporotomy and trans-corporeal resection, Shaeer's technique,” Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 218–225, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  2. S. Herschorn, M. Barkin, and R. Comisarow, “New technique for difficult penile implants,” Urology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 463–464, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. A. Rajpurkar, H. Li, and C. B. Dhabuwala, “Penile implant success in patients with corporal fibrosis using multiple incisions and minimal scar tissue excision,” Urology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 145–147, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. D. J. Summerton, T. R. Terry, J. R. Delk, and S. K. Wilson, “Reimplantation of inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) into scarred corporal bodies facilitated by the new AMS 700CXR cylinders,” BJU International, vol. 95, p. 102, 2005. View at Google Scholar