Vaginal Repair of Cystocele with Anterior Wall Mesh via Transobturator Route: Efficacy and Complications with Up to 3-Year Followup

Table 4

Review of literature of mesh use in cystocele repair.

Author	Year	Mesh	𝑛	Followup (months)	Anatomical success rate (%)	Vaginal infection (%)	Vaginal erosion (%)
Julian [5]	1996	Marlex	12	24	100	0	8.3
Nicita [6]	1998	Marlex	44	3	93.2	0	2.3
Flood et al. [7]	1998	Marlex	142	36	94.4	3.5	2.1
Mage [8]	1999	Mersuture	46	26	100	0	2.2
Migliari et al. [9]	2000	Prolene	12	20	75	0	0
Hardiman et al. [10]	2000	GyneMesh	18	1	100	0	11.1
Adhoute et al. [11]	2004	GyneMesh	52	27	95	0	3.8
Shah et al. [12]	2004	Prolene	29	25	93.3	0	6.7
Dwyer and O’Reilly [13]	2004	Atrium	47	29	94	0	7
Milani et al. [14]	2004	Prolene	63	17	94	0	13
de Tayrac et al. [15]	2006	GyneMesh	63	37	89.1	0	9.1
de Tayrac et al. [16]	2007	Sofradim Soft poly-propylene	132	13	92.3%.	0	6.3
*Hiltunen et al., [17]	2007	Low-weight polypropylene	104	12	93.3% versus 61.5% ant repair	0	17
*Sivaslioglu et al. [18]	2008	Polypropylene (Sofradim)	90	12	91% versus 72% (ant repair)	0	6.9
*Nieminen, et al. [19]	2008	Low-weight polypropylene	105	24	89% versus 59% (ant repair)	0	8.0

*denotes prospective randomized trial.