Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Urology
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 145942, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/145942
Clinical Study

Mini-Margin Nephron Sparing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma 4 cm or Less

1Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 222 zhongshan Road, Dalian 116011, China
2Department of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 222 zhongshan Road, Dalian 116011, China

Received 21 February 2010; Revised 18 May 2010; Accepted 9 July 2010

Academic Editor: Maxwell V. Meng

Copyright © 2010 Quanlin Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. C. Novick and S. B. Streem, “Surgery of the kidney,” in Campbell’s Urology, P. C. Walsh, A. B. Retik, E. D. Vaughan, and A. J. Wein, Eds., pp. 2973–3061, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 7th edition, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  2. A. Zucchi, L. Mearini, E. Mearini, E. Costantini, C. Vivacqua, and M. Porena, “Renal cell carcinoma: histological findings on surgical margins after nephron sparing surgery,” Journal of Urology, vol. 169, no. 3, pp. 905–908, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Z. Akçetin, V. Zugor, D. Elsässer et al., “Does the distance to normal renal parenchyma (DTNRP) in nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma have an effect on survival?” Anticancer Research, vol. 25, no. 3A, pp. 1629–1632, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Carini, A. Minervini, L. Masieri, A. Lapini, and S. Serni, “Simple enucleation for the treatment of PT1a renal cell carcinoma: our 20-year experience,” European Urology, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1263–1271, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Q.-L. Li, L. Cheng, H.-W. Guan, Y. Zhang, F.-P. Wang, and X.-S. Song, “Safety and efficacy of mini-margin nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4-cm or less,” Urology, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 924–927, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. G. Uzzo and A. C. Novick, “Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes,” Journal of Urology, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 6–18, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. F. Becker, S. Siemer, U. Humke, M. Hack, M. Ziegler, and M. Stöckle, “Elective nephron sparing surgery should become standard treatment for small unilateral renal cell carcinoma: long-term survival data of 216 patients,” European Urology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 308–313, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Pahernik, F. Roos, C. Hampel, R. Gillitzer, S. W. Melchior, and J. W. Thüroff, “Nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma with normal contralateral kidney: 25 years of experience,” Journal of Urology, vol. 175, no. 6, pp. 2027–2031, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. W. K. O. Lau, M. L. Blute, A. L. Weaver, V. E. Torres, and H. Zincke, “Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 75, no. 12, pp. 1236–1242, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. T. Lee, J. Katz, W. Shi, H. T. Thaler, V. E. Reuter, and P. Russo, “Surgical management of renal tumors 4 cm or less in a contemporary cohort,” Journal of Urology, vol. 163, no. 3, pp. 730–736, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. M. Corman, D. F. Penson, K. Hur et al., “Comparison of complications after radical and partial nephrectomy: results from the National Veterans Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program,” BJU International, vol. 86, no. 7, pp. 782–789, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. Shekarriz, J. Upadhyay, H. Shekarriz et al., “Comparison of costs and complications of radical and partial nephrectomy for treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma,” Urology, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 211–215, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. A. Castilla, L. S. Liou, N. A. Abrahams et al., “Prognostic importance of resection margin width after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma,” Urology, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 993–997, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. Y. Piper, J. T. Bishoff, C. Magee et al., “Is a 1-cm margin necessary during nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma?” Urology, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 849–852, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. E. Sutherland, M. I. Resnick, G. T. Maclennan, and H. B. Goldman, “Does the size of the surgical margin in partial nephrectomy for renal cell cancer really matter?” Journal of Urology, vol. 167, no. 1, pp. 61–64, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M.-O. Timsit, J.-P. Bazin, N. Thiounn et al., “Prospective study of safety margins in partial nephrectomy: intraoperative assessment and contribution of frozen section analysis,” Urology, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 923–926, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. N. Berdjis, O. W. Hakenberg, S. Zastrow, S. Oehlschläger, V. Novotny, and M. P. Wirth, “Impact of resection margin status after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma,” BJU International, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 1208–1210, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Q.-L. Li, H.-W. Guan, Q.-P. Zhang, L.-Z. Zhang, F.-P. Wang, and Y.-J. Liu, “Optimal margin in nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4 cm or less,” European Urology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 448–451, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus