Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Urology
Volume 2011, Article ID 359478, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/359478
Clinical Study

Long-Term Followup after Electrocautery Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

1Department of Urology, AMC University, 1100 DD NH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2076, Australia
3Sydney Adventist Hospital Clinical School, University of Sydney, P.O. Box 5017, Wahroonga, NSW 2076, Australia

Received 24 July 2011; Accepted 13 September 2011

Academic Editor: James A. Brown

Copyright © 2011 F. Kallenberg et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. C. Bruskewitz, E. H. Larsen, P. O. Madsen, and T. Dorflinger, “3-year followup of urinary symptoms after transurethral resection of the prostate,” Journal of Urology, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 613–615, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. H. Meyhoff and J. Nordling, “Long term results of transurethral and transvesical prostatectomy. A randomized study,” Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 27–33, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. T. Nielsen, M. M. Christensen, P. O. Madsen, and R. C. Bruskewitz, “Symptom analysis and uroflowmetry 7 years after transurethral resection of the prostate,” Journal of Urology, vol. 142, no. 5, pp. 1251–1253, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. N. P. Roos, J. E. Wennberg, D. J. Malenka et al., “Mortality and reoperation after open and transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 320, no. 17, pp. 1120–1124, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. W. K. Mebust, H. L. Holtgrewe, A. T. K. Cockett, and P. C. Peters, “Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. A cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients,” Journal of Urology, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 243–247, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Rassweiler, D. Teber, R. Kuntz, and R. Hofmann, “Complications of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)—incidence, management, and prevention,” European Urology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 969–980, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Wagrell, S. Schelin, J. Nordling et al., “Three-year follow-up of feedback microwave thermotherapy versus TURP for clinical BPH: a prospective randomized multicenter study,” Urology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 698–702, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. A. Ahyai, K. Lehrich, and R. M. Kuntz, “Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial,” European Urology, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1456–1464, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. L. Floratos, L. A. L. M. Kiemeney, C. Rossi, B. B. M. Kortmann, F. M. J. Debruyne, and J. J. M. C. H. De La Rosette, “Long-term follow-up of randomized transurethral microwave thermotherapy versus transurethral prostatic resection study,” Journal of Urology, vol. 165, no. 5, pp. 1533–1538, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Tuhkanen, A. Heino, S. Aaltomaa, and M. Ala-Opas, “Long-term results of contact laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with small or moderately enlarged prostates,” Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 487–493, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. Kaya, A. Ilktac, E. Gokmen, M. Ozturk, and I. M. Karaman, “The long-term results of transurethral vaporization of the prostate using plasmakinetic energy,” British Journal of Urology International, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 845–848, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. H. E. Van Melick, G. E. P. M. Van Venrooij, and T. A. Boon, “Long-term follow-up after transurethral resection of the prostate, contact laser prostatectomy, and electrovaporization,” Urology, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1029–1034, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. W. B. Shingleton, P. Farabaugh, and W. May, “Three-year follow-up of laser prostatectomy versus transurethral resection of the prostate in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia,” Urology, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 305–308, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. R. Keoghane, M. E. Sullivan, H. A. Doll, J. Kourambas, and D. W. Cranston, “Five-year data from the Oxford Laser Prostatectomy Trial,” British Journal of Urology International, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 227–228, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Mattiasson, L. Wagrell, S. Schelin et al., “. Five-year follow-up of feedback microwave thermotherapy versus TURP for clinical BPH: a prospective randomized multicenter study,” Urology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 91–96, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Y. Hammadeh, S. Madaan, M. Singh, and T. Philp, “A 3-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy,” British Journal of Urology International, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 648–651, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. D. McConnell, M. S. Barry, R. C. Bruskewitz et al., Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Diagnosis and Treatment. Clinical Practice Guidelines no. 8, US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, Md, USA, 1994.
  18. A. L. Finkle, T. G. Moyers, M. I. Tobenkin, and S. D. King, “Sexual potency in aging males,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 170, no. 12, pp. 1391–1393, 1959. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. Kunelius, J. Häkkinen, and O. Lukkarinen, “Sexual functions in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia before and after transurethral resection of the prostate,” Urological Research, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 7–9, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. G. Borboroglu, C. J. Kane, J. F. Ward, J. L. Roberts, and J. P. Sands, “Immediate and postoperative complications of transurethral prostatectomy in the 1990s,” Journal of Urology, vol. 162, no. 4, pp. 1307–1310, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. J. Gilling, M. Mackey, M. Cresswell, K. Kennett, J. N. Kabalin, and M. R. Fraundorfer, “Holmium laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial with 1-year follow-up,” Journal of Urology, vol. 162, no. 5, pp. 1640–1644, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Y. Hammadeh, G. A. Fowlis, M. Singh, and T. Philp, “Transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate—a possible alternative to transurethral resection: a one-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial,” British Journal of Urology, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 721–725, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. Haupt, J. Pannek, S. Benkert et al., “Transurethral resection of the prostate with microprocessor controlled electrosurgical unit,” Journal of Urology, vol. 158, no. 2, pp. 497–501, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. M. Kuntz, S. Ahyai, K. Lehrich, and A. Fayad, “Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral electrocautery resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial in 200 patients,” Journal of Urology, vol. 172, no. 3, pp. 1012–1016, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Tefekli, A. Y. Muslumanoglu, M. Baykal, M. Binbay, A. Tas, and F. Altunrende, “A hybrid technique using bipolar energy in transurethral prostate surgery: a prospective, randomized comparison,” Journal of Urology, vol. 174, no. 4, pp. 1339–1343, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. R. Keoghane, K. C. Lawrence, A. M. Gray et al., “A double-blind randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation of transurethral resection vs contact laser vaporization for benign prostatic enlargement: a 3-year follow-up,” British Journal of Urology International, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 74–78, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. W. J. McAllister, M. J. Absalom, K. Mir et al., “Does endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate stand the test of time? Five-year results from a multicentre randomized controlled trial of endoscopic laser ablation against transurethral resection of the prostate,” British Journal of Urology International, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 437–439, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Y. Hammadeh, S. Madaan, J. Hines, and T. Philp, “5-Year outcome of a prospective randomized trial to compare transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate and standard transurethral resection,” Urology, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 1166–1171, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. F. Mishriki, S. J. S. Grimsley, G. Nabi, A. Martindale, and N. P. Cohen, “Improved quality of life and enhanced satisfaction after TURP: prospective 12-year follow-up study,” Urology, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 322–326, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus