Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Urology
Volume 2014, Article ID 105709, 6 pages
Clinical Study

Factors Influencing the Duration of Urine Leakage following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

1Department of Urology, Abant Izzet Baysal Medical Faculty, 14280 Bolu, Turkey
2Department of Radiology, Abant Izzet Baysal Medical Faculty, 14280 Bolu, Turkey

Received 11 September 2013; Revised 5 December 2013; Accepted 26 December 2013; Published 4 February 2014

Academic Editor: Walid A. Farhat

Copyright © 2014 Ugur Uyeturk et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Purpose. The duration of urine leakage following the removal of the nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) shows significant variations depending on the techniques used. We aimed to assess the factors likely to influence the duration of urine leakage. Material and Methods. In total, 103 patients who underwent PCNL were reviewed retrospectively. DUL was evaluated regarding patient characteristics, thickness of the access line, presence of hydronephrosis, and residual stones. Results. DUL was significantly prolonged in accordance with a decrease in the thickness of parenchyma tissue ( , ). DUL was prolonged as the degree of hydronephrosis ( , ) and the number of patients with residual stones ( , ) increased. Median DUL was significantly longer in patients with residual stones than those without residual stones ( ). In the receiving operating curve analysis, the optimum cut-off value of parenchymal thickness for hospitalization ≤12 h was 17.2 mm (sensitivity, 90.2%; specificity, 69.4%; ). Conclusions. We found that parenchymal thickness of the access line, hydronephrosis, and residual stones were the most influential factors determining DUL following PCNL, respectively.