Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Urology
Volume 2015, Article ID 495308, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/495308
Research Article

Measurement of the Physical Properties during Laparoscopic Surgery Performed on Pigs by Using Forceps with Pressure Sensors

1Department of Urology, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
2Mitsubishi Precision Co., Ltd., Kamakura 247-8505, Japan
3Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan

Received 6 November 2014; Revised 2 January 2015; Accepted 16 January 2015

Academic Editor: Walid A. Farhat

Copyright © 2015 Hiroyuki Yamanaka et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. P. W. F. Wijn, M. C. Persoon, B. M. A. Schout, E. J. Martens, A. J. J. A. Scherpbier, and A. J. M. Hendrikx, “Virtual reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator is lacking in construct validity,” Journal of Endourology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 117–122, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, “Guideline for performing endoscopy surgery,” Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, vol. 2, p. 7, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  3. A. Miyajima, M. Hasegawa, T. Takeda et al., “How do young residents practice laparoscopic surgical skills?” Urology, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 352–356, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. D. Vlaovic, E. R. Sargent, J. R. Boker et al., “Immediate impact of an intensive one-week laparoscopy training program on laparoscopic skills among postgraduate urologists,” Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Q. Le, D. J. Lightner, L. VanderLei, J. W. Segura, and M. T. Gettman, “The current role of medical simulation in American urological residency training programs: an assessment by program directors,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 288–291, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. R. Korndorffer Jr., D. Stefanidis, and D. J. Scott, “Laparoscopic skills laboratories: current assessment and a call for resident training standards,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 191, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Maschuw, I. Hassan, and D. K. Bartsch, “Surgical training using simulator: virtual reality,” Chirurg, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 19–24, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Beyer, J. D. Troyer, J. Mancini, F. Bladou, S. V. Berdah, and G. Karsenty, “Impact of laparoscopy simulator training on the technical skills of future surgeons in the operating room: a prospective study,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 202, no. 3, pp. 265–272, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. L. Diesen, L. Erhunmwunsee, K. M. Bennett et al., “Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices,” Journal of Surgical Education, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 282–289, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Jayaraman, A. L. Trejos, M. D. Naish, A. Lyle, R. V. Patel, and C. M. Schlachta, “Toward construct validity for a novel sensorized instrument-based minimally invasive surgery simulation system,” Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1439–1445, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. L. Trejos, R. V. Patel, R. A. Malthaner, and C. M. Schlachta, “Development of force-based metrics for skills assessment in minimally invasive surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 2106–2019, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. Yamanaka, K. Makiyama, T. Tatenuma, R. Sakata, F. Sano, and Y. Kubota, “Preparation for pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction using a patient-specific laparoscopic simulator: a case report,” Journal of Medical Case Reports, vol. 6, article 338, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. K. Makiyama, M. Nagasaka, T. Inuiya, K. Takanami, M. Ogata, and Y. Kubota, “Development of a patient-specific simulator for laparoscopic renal surgery,” International Journal of Urology, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 829–835, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. Makiyama, R. Sakata, H. Yamanaka, T. Tatenuma, F. Sano, and Y. Kubota, “Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma with situs inversus totalis: preoperative training using a patient-specific simulator,” Urology, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 1375–1378, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Ogata, M. Nagasaka, T. Inuiya, K. Makiyama, and Y. Kubota, “A development of surgical simulator for training of operative skills using patient-specific data,” in Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 19, pp. 361–373, IOS Press, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  16. J. Brewin, T. Nedas, B. Challacombe, O. Elhage, J. Keisu, and P. Dasgupta, “Face, content and construct validation of the first virtual reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator,” BJU International, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 850–854, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. P. W. F. Wijn, M. C. Persoon, B. M. A. Schout, E. J. Martens, A. J. J. A. Scherpbier, and A. J. M. Hendrikx, “Virtual reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator is lacking in construct validity,” Journal of Endourology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 117–122, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Ogata, K. Makiyama, T. Yamada, M. Nagasaka, H. Yamanaka, and Y. Kubota, “Dynamic measuring of physical properties for developing a sophisticated preoperative surgical simulator: how much reaction force should a surgical simulator represent to the surgeon?” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 184, pp. 312–318, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. I. S. Mackenzie, I. B. Wilkinson, and J. R. Cockcroft, “Assessment of arterial stiffness in clinical practice,” QJM—Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 67–74, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. Yoshida, Y. Kuroda, Y. Kagiyama et al., “Pressure measurement in three axial directions on the tip of the laparoscopic forceps and skill analysis in a dissection procedure,” Transactions of Japanese Society for Medical and Biological Engineering, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 25–32, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. I. Sakuma, T. Hisada, C. K. Chui et al., “In vitro measurement of mechanical propertiesof liver tissue under compression and elongation using a new test piece holding method with surgical glue,” in Surgery Simulation and Soft Tissue Modeling: International Symposium, IS4TM 2003 Juan-Les-Pins, France, June 12-13, 2003, Proceedings, vol. 2673 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 284–292, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. Y. Hayashi, K. Kiguchi, K. Konishi, H. Nakashima, and M. Hashizume, “Estimation of forceps nonlinear haptic parameters for laparoscopic surgery simulator,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2010.
  23. K. Kiguchi, M. Yamamoto, K. Konishi et al., “1A1-A11 Development of Laparoscopic Surgery Simulators-Dynamic Properties of Operated Forceps during the Laparoscopic Surgery,” Nippon Kikai Gakkai Robotikusu, Mekatoronikusu Koenkai Koen Ronbunshu (CD-ROM), 2006.
  24. C. Sarkissian, G. S. Marchini, and M. Monga, “Endoscopic forceps for ureteroscopy: a comparative in vitro analysis,” Urology, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 690–695, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus