Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Urology
Volume 2016, Article ID 6841837, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6841837
Clinical Study

Does Leaving the Biopsy Needle in Povidone-Iodine Solution Reduce Infective Complications after Biopsy?

1Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey
2Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey
3Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey

Received 21 September 2016; Revised 23 November 2016; Accepted 27 November 2016

Academic Editor: Jason M. Hafron

Copyright © 2016 Erdal Benli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. Djavan, M. Waldert, A. Zlotta et al., “Safety and morbidity of first and repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies: results of a prospective European prostate cancer detection study,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 166, no. 3, pp. 856–860, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. L. Zani, O. A. C. Clark, and N. Rodrigues Netto Jr., “Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 5, Article ID CD006576, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Ghafoori, M. Shakiba, H. Seifmanesh, and K. Hoseini, “Decrease in infection rate following use of povidone-iodine during transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a double blind randomized clinical trial,” Iranian Journal of Radiology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 67–70, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Carignan, J.-F. Roussy, V. Lapointe, L. Valiquette, R. Sabbagh, and J. Pépin, “Increasing risk of infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: time to reassess antimicrobial prophylaxis?” European Urology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 453–459, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Batura, G. G. Rao, and P. B. Nielsen, “Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in intestinal flora of patients undergoing prostatic biopsy: implications for prophylaxis and treatment of infections after biopsy,” BJU International, vol. 106, no. 7, pp. 1017–1020, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. S. Jeon, S.-H. Woo, J.-H. Hyun, H. Y. Choi, and S. E. Chai, “Bisacodyl rectal preparation can decrease infectious complications of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy,” Urology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 461–466, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. Kanjanawongdeengam, W. Viseshsindh, P. Santanirand, P. Prathombutr, and S. Nilkulwattana, “Reduction in bacteremia rates after rectum sterilization before transrectal, ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a randomized controlled trial,” Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 1621–1626, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. O. M. Zaytoun, T. Anil, A. S. Moussa, L. Jianbo, K. Fareed, and J. S. Jones, “Morbidity of prostate biopsy after simplified versus complex preparation protocols: assessment of risk factors,” Urology, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 910–914, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. Bruyère, B. F. d'Arcier, J.-M. Boutin, and O. Haillot, “Is urine culture routinely necessary before prostate biopsy?” Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 260–262, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y.-C. Huang, D.-R. Ho, C.-F. Wu, J.-J. Shee, W.-Y. Lin, and C.-S. Chen, “Modified bowel preparation to reduce infection after prostate biopsy,” Chang Gung Medical Journal, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 395–400, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. American Cancer Society, http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/prostate.
  12. L. V. Rodríguez and M. K. Terris, “Risks and complications of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: a prospective study and review of the literature,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 160, no. 6, part 1, pp. 2115–2120, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. I.-N. Chiang, S.-J. Chang, Y.-S. Pu, K.-H. Huang, H.-J. Yu, and C.-Y. Huang, “Major complications and associated risk factors of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: a retrospective study of 1875 cases in Taiwan,” Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, vol. 106, no. 11, pp. 929–934, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. O. Kehinde, M. Al-Maghrebi, M. Sheikh, and J. T. Anim, “Combined ciprofloxacin and amikacin prophylaxis in the prevention of septicemia after transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 189, no. 3, pp. 911–915, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Puig, A. Darnell, P. Bermúdez et al., “Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary?” European Radiology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 939–943, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. I. Pinkhasov, Y.-K. Lin, R. Palmerola et al., “Complications following prostate needle biopsy requiring hospital admission or emergency department visits—experience from 1000 consecutive cases,” BJU International, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 369–374, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. M. Livermore, D. James, M. Reacher et al., “Trends in fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin) resistance in enterobacteriaceae from bacteremias, England and Wales, 1990–1999,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 473–478, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. O. M. Zaytoun, E. H. Vargo, R. Rajan, R. Berglund, S. Gordon, and J. S. Jones, “Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli as cause of postprostate biopsy infection: implications for prophylaxis and treatment,” Urology, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 1035–1041, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Feliciano, E. Teper, M. Ferrandino et al., “The incidence of fluoroquinolone resistant infections after prostate biopsy—are fluoroquinolones still effective prophylaxis?” The Journal of Urology, vol. 179, no. 3, pp. 952–955, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. A. Duplessis, M. Bavaro, M. P. Simons et al., “Rectal cultures before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy reduce post-prostatic biopsy infection rates,” Urology, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 556–561, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. K. Taylor, T. R. Zembower, R. B. Nadler et al., “Targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis using rectal swab cultures in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is associated with reduced incidence of postoperative infectious complications and cost of care,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 187, no. 4, pp. 1275–1279, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. J. Summers, D. P. Patel, B. D. Hamilton et al., “An antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol using rectal swab cultures for transrectal prostate biopsy,” World Journal of Urology, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 2001–2007, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. M. Carey and H. J. Korman, “Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate. Do enemas decrease clinically significant complications?” The Journal of Urology, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 82–85, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. S. Wolf Jr., C. J. Bennett, R. R. Dmochowski, B. K. Hollenbeck, M. S. Pearle, and A. J. Schaeffer, “Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 179, no. 4, pp. 1379–1390, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. R. Gyorfi, C. Otteni, K. Brown et al., “Peri-procedural povidone-iodine rectal preparation reduces microorganism counts and infectious complications following ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate,” World Journal of Urology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 905–909, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. S. Park, J. J. Oh, J. H. Lee, W. K. Jang, Y. K. Hong, and S. K. Hong, “Simple use of the suppository type povidone-iodine can prevent infectious complications in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy,” Advances in Urology, vol. 2009, Article ID 750598, 4 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Z. Abughosh, J. Margolick, S. L. Goldenberg et al., “A prospective randomized trial of povidone-iodine prophylactic cleansing of the rectum before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 189, no. 4, pp. 1326–1331, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. Koc, S. Un, D. N. Filiz, K. Akbay, and Y. Yilmaz, “Does washing the biopsy needle with povidone-iodine have an effect on infection rates after transrectal prostate needle biopsy?” Urologia Internationalis, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 147–151, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus