Authors, year Study type Questionnaire
Follow-up (months) Urethroplasty Age (median) Results Singh et al., 2010 [32 ] 150 R BMSFI >3 AU 40 Mean preop BMSFI Ej: 4,7; postop: 6,3 < 0,001, improved Sharma et al., 2011 [27 ] 34 P BMSFI 3 AU 34,6 Mean preop BMSFI Ej: 4,68; postop: 6,71 = 0,00, improved
Erickson et al., 2007 [33 ] 52 R BMSFI 4 AU 41,7 Mean preop BMSFI Ej: 5,3; postop: 6,2 < 0,04, improved
Barbagli et al., 2008 [3 ] 60 R N. Valid. 68 AU 39 23% ejaculatory dysfunction
Erickson et al., 2010 [61 ] 43 P MSHQ 6,8 AU 40,4 Mean preop MSHQ Ej: 25,54; postop: 26,94 = 0,17, NSD overall  70% no change 19% improved 11% decreased
El-Assmy et al., 2015 [62 ] 58 R MSHQ 61,3 PU 31,6 8,6 ejaculatory dysfunction
Anger et al., 2008 [63 ] 32 R N. Valid. 58,8 PU 38,6 100% antegrade ejaculation 15,6% decreased volume