Review Article

Comparison of Different Invasive Devices for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy

Table 1

36 prospective clinical trials included in the analysis: main characteristics of the trials.

AuthorYearStudy typeNo. of patientsTreatment group (A, B, C, D, and E)Device usedTotal complication rate (%)Severe complication rate (%)

Suzuki et al. [10]2012PT4BGynemesh bone anchored sling62.0%0%
Suzuki et al. [10]2012PT4BProlenemesh bone anchored sling62.0%0%
Migliari et al. [11]2006PT49BPolypropylene sling96.0%0%
Bauer et al. [31]2016PT115BAdvance XP sling6.0%3.5%
Bauer et al. [30]2010PT137BAdvance sling13, 9%2.2%
Migliari et al. [37]2003PT9BPolypropylene sling55, 5%0%
Bauer et al. [12]2009PT124BAdvance sling12, 9%0, 8%
Ferro et al. [28]2016PT29BVIRTUE transobturator sling58, 6%0%
Galiano et al. [27]2016PT52BTOMS transobturator sling13, 5%0%
Leruth et al. [23]2012PT173BTOMS transobturator sling25, 4%0%
Zaragoza et al. [22]2005PT4BINVANCE sling0%0%
John et al. [21]2005PT16BPorcine skin collagen + polypropylene sling25.0%0%
Collado et al. [15]2018PT94BAdvance + advance XP sling23.4%0%
Collado et al. [14]2009PT27BInvance sling26.0%0%
Trigo Rocha et al. [36]2008PT40DAMS 800 artificial sphincter10.0%0%
Correia Lima et al. [32]2018PT15DBR—SL—AS—904 artificial sphincter0%0%
Lai et al. [24]2009PT129DAMS 800 artificial sphincter
Trigo Rocha et al. [20]2006PT25EProACT17.3%0%
Bauer et al. [41]2011PT24BAdvance sling16.7%0%
Noordhof et al. [35]2017PT143EPRO-ACT9.8%2.1%
Seweryn et al. [34]2012PT38CATOMS readjustable transobturator sling52, 6%0%
Kim et al. [33]2016PT64CMRS readjustable sling9, 4%4, 7%
Renè Yiou et al. [25]2014PT20EPRO-ACT10.0%0%
Renè Yiou et al. [29]2016PT40BTOMS transobturator sling17, 5%0%
Hoda et al. [26]2012PT124CATMOS readjustable transobturator sling60, 5%4.0%
Hoda et al. [26]2012PT99CATMOS readjustable transobturator sling68, 7%4.0%
Martens et al. [19]2009PT29EPRO-ACT68.0%44, 8%
Introini et al. [18]2012PT66CSilimed periurethral constrictor adjustable sling4, 5%0%
Le Portz et al. [17]2016PT93BSurgimesh M-SLING2, 1%0%
Dikranian et al. [16]2004PT20APorcine dermal Collagene5.0%5.0%
Dikranian et al. [16]2004PT16BSilicone mesh sling12.0%0%
Gregori et al. [13]2008PT11EProAct0%0%
Cestari et al. [9]2017RT120BAutologous sling (6 branches versus 2 branches)6.7%5.0%
Van Uhm et al. [38]2018PT10AOpsys bulking agent (polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer40.0%0%
Cestari et al. [39]2015PT60BAutologous sling10.0%0%
Stephen J et al. [40]2005PT15BSling polyglactin mesh0%0%
Crivellaro et al. [21]2008PT46EPro-ACT12.3%4%
Crivellaro et al. [21]2008PT38BBAMS polypropylene bulbourethral sling19.4%10.9%
Queissert F et al. [43]2022PT12CATMOS readjustable transobturator sling

Note. PT = prospective nonrandomized trial. RT = randomized trial. Treatment group: A = bulking agent, B = fixed sling, C = adjustable sling, D = artificial sphincter, E = ProACT.