Advances in Virology

Advances in Virology / 2012 / Article
Special Issue

Virus Variability and Its Impact on HIV and Hepatitis Therapy

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 123605 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/123605

Luna Li, Satinder Dahiya, Sandhya Kortagere, Benjamas Aiamkitsumrit, David Cunningham, Vanessa Pirrone, Michael R. Nonnemacher, Brian Wigdahl, "Impact of Tat Genetic Variation on HIV-1 Disease", Advances in Virology, vol. 2012, Article ID 123605, 28 pages, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/123605

Impact of Tat Genetic Variation on HIV-1 Disease

Academic Editor: Nicola Coppola
Received22 Feb 2012
Accepted14 May 2012
Published30 Jul 2012

Abstract

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) promoter or long-terminal repeat (LTR) regulates viral gene expression by interacting with multiple viral and host factors. The viral transactivator protein Tat plays an important role in transcriptional activation of HIV-1 gene expression. Functional domains of Tat and its interaction with transactivation response element RNA and cellular transcription factors have been examined. Genetic variation within tat of different HIV-1 subtypes has been shown to affect the interaction of the viral transactivator with cellular and/or viral proteins, influencing the overall level of transcriptional activation as well as its action as a neurotoxic protein. Consequently, the genetic variability within tat may impact the molecular architecture of functional domains of the Tat protein that may impact HIV pathogenesis and disease. Tat as a therapeutic target for anti-HIV drugs has also been discussed.

1. Introduction

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is the causative agent of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The HIV-1 genome is about 9.8 kb in length, including two viral long-terminal repeats (LTRs) located at both ends when integrated into the host genome. The genome also includes genes that encode for the structural proteins ([Gag], [Pol], and [Env]), regulatory proteins (Tat and [Rev]), and accessory proteins ([Vpu], [Vpr], [Vif], and [Nef]). The HIV-1 transactivator of transcription (Tat) protein is an early regulatory protein containing from 86 to 106 amino acids in length with a molecular weight of approximately 14 to 16 kDa. Tat is a multifunctional protein that has been proposed to contribute to several pathological consequences of HIV-1 infection. Tat not only plays an important role in viral transcription and replication, it is also capable of inducing the expression of a variety of cellular genes as well as acting as a neurotoxic protein. In this review, the functions of Tat and molecular diversity in Tat are addressed. Moreover, the interaction of Tat with the viral LTR and cellular factors are documented and discussed. Because of its pivotal role in viral replication and disease pathogenesis, Tat and the cellular pathways targeted by Tat could be potential targets for new anti-HIV drugs. Therapeutic strategies that have focused on this topic are also reviewed.

2. Functional Domains of the Transactivator Protein Tat

Tat is a 14 to 16 kDa nuclear protein. It is a multifunctional protein, which is essential for the productive and processive transcription driven from the HIV-1 LTR promoter, and is required for overall productive viral replication [1, 2]. It is a 101-amino acid protein encoded by two exons: the first exon encodes amino acids 1 to 72; the second encodes residues from 73 to 101 (Figure 1) [3]. Most clinical HIV-1 isolates of Tat include 101 amino acids, whereas a few isolates contain from 86 to 106 amino acids, with the second exon coding from 14 to 34 residues at the C terminus of the protein [4]. The HIV-1 IIIB Tat used in many in vitro experiments contains 86 amino acids, corresponding to HIV-1 (strain BRU) or a closely related sequence from the HXB2 HIV-1 infectious molecular clone [5, 6]. This 86-amino acid configuration of Tat is the most frequently used form for laboratory investigations; however, it must be noted that it represents a truncated protein when compared to Tat from many clinical isolates. Several studies have established that HIV-1 Tat maintains the 101-amino acid composition as previously reviewed [7]. The more truncated 86-amino acid version of Tat appears to be functional [4], but functions like modulation of host cell cytoskeleton modifications [8] and perhaps optimal replication in cells of the monocyte-macrophage lineage have been attributed to the second exon. Also, the fact that most clinical isolates preserve the full 101-amino acid form is indicative of the functional relevance of the second exon in an in vivo setting.

Tat has been divided into six different functional domains (Figure 1) [3, 4, 9]. The N-terminal domain (residues 1–21, also known as the acidic domain) is a proline-rich region containing a conserved tryptophan residue and a number of acidic amino acids. This region is able to form an -helix and is tolerant of numerous single-residue changes without severe compromise in protein function. The second domain (residues 21–37, also referred to as the cysteine-rich domain) contains a highly conserved cysteine-rich tract including seven cysteines at positions 22, 25, 27, 30, 31, 34, and 37, four of which are responsible for the formation of disulfide bridges; changes in any one of six of the seven cysteines significantly affect Tat function [10]. The third domain (residues 38–48) has a hydrophobic core sequence: 43LGISYG48. The first three domains (amino acid 1–48) comprise the minimal region for Tat transactivation capability. Within this region, genetic variation resulting in changes in amino acids from 1 to 21 is typically tolerated; however, changes in residues from 22 to 40 are deleterious with respect to transactivation. The fourth domain (residues 49–57, the basic domain) is a positively charged region composed of a well-conserved 49RKKRRQRRR57 motif, also known as the arginine-rich motif, or transactivation response element- (TAR) binding domain. This region is necessary for Tat nuclear localization, binding to the HIV-1 leader RNA TAR [1113], and uptaken by other cells [14, 15]. Studies have also demonstrated that Tat utilizes the basic domain residues from 48 to 60 for the functional internalization into cells [16, 17]. The fifth domain (residues 58–72) is a glutamine-rich region shown to exhibit the greatest degree of genetic variability. The fourth and fifth domains together (residues 49–72) are referred to as the basic region. The sixth domain (amino acid 73–101) encoded by the second exon has been less well characterized but may contribute to viral infectivity and binding to cell-surface integrins [1820]. Two short motifs have been identified in the C terminus of Tat: the RGD (arg-gly-asp) motif, which is a ligand for several integrins, and the highly conserved ESKKKVE motif, which may be related to optimal HIV-1 replication in vivo [18, 21]. Although the transactivation domain has been localized to Tat exon I, Tat exon II also plays a role in kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cell-(NF-κB) dependent control of HIV-1 transcription in T cells [22]. The glutamic acid residues 92, 94, and 96 or lysine residues 88, 89, and 90 within the Tat exon II exhibit a critical role in activating NF-κB, transactivating the HIV-1 LTR, and enhancing HIV-1 replication in T cells.

3. Basal and Stimulated Transactivation Driven by the HIV-1 LTR

The HIV-1 LTRs are generated during the process of reverse transcription and located on each end of the proviral DNA when the provirus is integrated into the host genome. The LTR is approximately 640 base pairs in length and divided into the unique 5′ (U5) and 3′ (U3) regions as well as the repeat region (Figure 2). LTR sequences include four functional regulatory regions with respect to the control of HIV-1 transcription: TAR element, core promoter, enhancer region, and modulatory region [47]. A multitude of HIV-1 promoter regulatory elements are located within the U3 region of the 5′ LTR and drive the production of HIV-1 mRNA that codes for proteins involved in regulating viral replication as well as the assembly and release of infectious progeny virus. The core region of the LTR is composed of the TATAA box, which is located 29–24 nucleotides upstream of the transcriptional start site, and specificity protein (Sp) binding sites, which are three tandem GC-rich binding sites (−45 to −77) interacting with transcription factors Sp1 through Sp4. The TATAA box binds TATAA-binding protein in association with a number of other proteins that comprise the RNA polymerase II (pol II) transcription complex for transcription initiation and elongation [4850]. The enhancer element is primarily composed of two copies of 10-base pair binding sites for NF- Bs and related proteins [51]. The modulatory region, which is in the 5′ end of the U3 region, contains binding sites for many factors, including CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) factors [52], activating transcription factor/cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (ATF/CREB) [53], nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) [54], and a number of other proteins, depending on cell phenotype, differentiation status, and state of activation (Figure 2) [5558].

The integrated proviral DNA interfaces with the normal molecular architecture of the host chromatin, which is assembled into nucleosomes. Each nucleosome contains a protein core made of eight histone molecules (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) and 146 nucleotide-long double-stranded DNA wrapped around it [59]. Independent of the integration site, two nucleosomes (designated nuc-0 and nuc-1) are precisely organized on the HIV-1 viral promoter DNA (Figure 2) [60, 61]. In a transcriptionally quiescent state, nuc-0 is positioned at nucleotide from −405 to −245 relative to the transcriptional start site, and nuc-1 is positioned at nucleotide from +20 to +165 relative to the transcriptional start site (Figure 2). These wrapped regions define two open nucleosome-free regions in the viral DNA, extending from −244 to +19 and +166 to +256 relative to the transcription start site (Figure 2). These open regions include the HIV-1 LTR modulatory, enhancer/core region, transcription factor-binding sites for AP3-L, Sp1 [60], and upstream regulatory factor (USF) [62], and a region overlapping the primer-binding site immediately downstream of the 5′ LTR [63]. It has been proposed and shown that displacement of nuc-1 is a prerequisite for HIV-1 transcription as observed in response to T cell activation stimuli [60]. Conformation of the nucleosomes is modulated in two ways: (1) posttranslational modifications of N-terminal tails of histones, namely acetylation, phosphorylation, and methylation through factors like histone acetyl transferases (HATs), histone deacetylases (HDACs), histone methyltransferases (HMTs), and kinases and (2) ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes such as P300/CBP-associated factor (PCAF) and the SWI/SNF family [64].

Acetylation of specific lysine residues within the N-termini of selective core histones by HATs neutralizes positive charges on these amino acids, thereby weakening histone-DNA interactions and making the DNA more “open” or accessible to the transcriptional machinery [65, 66]. In contrast, recruitment of HDACs results in transcriptional repression. For example, recruitment of histone deacetylase-1 (HDAC1) by NF-κB p50 was found to constitutively maintain nuc-0 and nuc-1 in a deacetylated state, thus keeping the chromatin in a condensed state, impairing RNA pol II recruitment and transcriptional initiation (Figure 3) [67]. The importance of HDAC1 has been shown by studies that have proposed a dynamic model for LTR regulation in T cells by two cellular transcriptional regulators YY1 and LSF [68]. They form a trimeric complex with HDAC1 at a region-spanning nucleotides from −10 to +27 of the HIV-1 LTR. Whereas LSF-1 binds to DNA, YY1 serves as an intermolecular bridge to anchor HDAC1 to this region [68].

Histone methylation can also have a number of effects on transcription. For example, methylation of lysine-9 (K9) on histone-3 (H3) by HMTs has been shown to be linked with transcriptional silencing, just as methylation of K4 that is associated with activation [69]. Accordingly, maintenance of the heterochromatic state at the integrated HIV-1 promoter has been shown to be mediated by the methyltransferase Suv39H1, which specifically mediates H3-K9 trimethylation, and the heterochromatin protein-1γ, which has been shown to recruit HMT [7072]. Apart from methylation of histone, hypermethylation of CpG sites found within the HIV-1 LTR has also been shown to repress basal and activation-induced promoter activity, thereby inducing a state of latency [73].

Activation of HIV-1 transcription is mediated by host cell transcription factors and viral proteins via interactions with the cis-regulating elements in the LTR, along with protein-protein interactions in the regulatory pathway(s) [3]. LTR-basal transcription is driven primarily through cellular transcription factors such as Sp1 and NF-κB, which help recruit the RNA pol II complex to the transcriptional start site. This process can be enhanced during cell activation stimulated by a number of cytokines [74]. The availability of host cell transcription factors and viral proteins regulates HIV-1 gene expression in the context of specific cell types, cell-cycle regulation, cellular differentiation, and cellular activation [75]. Sequestration of two critical transcription factors, NF-κB and NFAT, in the cytoplasm of resting CD4+ T cells contributes to the repressive state of the HIV-1 LTR in these cells [76]. The paucity of these factors within the nucleus is reversed in response to activation signals. T cell receptor (TCR) cross-linking, cytokine stimulation (e.g., TNF- , IL-7), or mitogens (e.g., protein kinase C activators like the phorbol ester PMA and prostratin) lead to nuclear translocation of these molecules and subsequent binding to overlapping cognate sites in the HIV-1 LTR, thereby upregulating basal as well as Tat-mediated promoter activity (Figure 3). TCR ligation also induces transcription and heterodimerization of the c-jun/c-fos complex AP-1, which is absent in resting T cells [77] and synergizes with NFAT and NF-κB to promote HIV-1 gene expression. Basal and stimulated transcription produces predominantly short RNA as a result of the hypophosphorylated state of RNA pol II. However, an increasing number of longer transcripts encode for a pool of viral regulatory proteins, especially Tat, that eventually feedback to enhance the next stage of viral transcription, designated Tat-mediated transcription.

4. Tat-Mediated Transactivation of the HIV-1 LTR through Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 9 and Cyclin T1

HIV-1 transcription involves an early, Tat-independent phase and a late, Tat-dependent phase, and transactivation of the viral genome is a critical step in the viral replication cycle [3, 78]. In the presence of Tat, LTR-mediated transcriptional activity can be enhanced tens or hundreds of fold [7982], whereas viral replication falls to nearly undetectable levels in the absence of Tat, and short transcripts (30–50 nucleotides) predominate [8385]. Tat is a unique transcription factor in that it binds to the “UCU” bulge of the TAR, a cis-acting RNA enhancer element within the 5′ end of all viral transcripts. The TAR is located immediately downstream of the transcriptional start site in the HIV-1 LTR, encompassing nucleotides from +1 to +59 [86, 87], and is required for the function of the viral transactivator protein Tat. The Tat-TAR interaction acts to tether Tat and allow its interaction with the basal transcriptional machinery, thus increasing viral transcription and elongation [88, 89]. In a mature transcript, TAR adopts a hairpin structure including a six-nucleotide loop, a trinucleotide pyrimidine bulge, and an extensive duplex structure [86]. U23, in the bulge, is critical for Tat binding [2, 13, 90]; the other two neighboring residues C24 and U25 can be replaced by other nucleotides without affecting Tat binding. Another two regions above the bulge (G26-C39 and A27-U38) and one region below (A22-U40) also contribute to Tat binding [2, 13, 90]. Although the loop structure does not appear to be required for Tat binding, the residues in the loop have been shown to be required for Tat transactivation activity [90].

Specifically, HIV-1 Tat has been shown to associate with the P-TEFb, which is composed of cyclin T1 and cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) [24, 91, 92]. This association occurs in a sequential manner. Once bound, CDK9 has been shown to phosphorylate the carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA pol II and promote transcription elongation [24, 91, 93]. Therefore, the lack of HIV-1 gene expression in latently infected cells might not only arise due to the absence of Tat but also as a result of extremely low levels of CDK9 and cyclin T1, as observed in resting CD4+ T cells [94]. In addition, mutations in the tat gene, the Tat-responsive element itself, might also contribute to the latent phenotype, as is evident from experiments performed in the U1 [95] and ACH-2 [96] cell lines, respectively. The cyclin T1 subunit of P-TEFb has been shown to interact with the activation domain of Tat and to bind to the central loop (+30 to +35) of TAR [92]. Once cyclin T1 binds to Tat, the CycT1-Tat complex has been shown to bind both the bulge and the loop regions of TAR with a higher affinity than Tat alone and to subsequently form the CycT1-Tat-TAR ternary complex [92, 97, 98].

With respect to sequence variation within the TAR region, different subtypes have been shown to have distinct TAR motifs, with most of the sequence variation occurring in the stem region [99]. Subtypes A/E and A contain a nucleotide deletion (T25) in the TAR bulge region (T23C24T25) leading to the formation of a two-nucleotide bulge [100104]. This sequence alteration does not affect subtype B Tat binding to the subtype E TAR region. However, the studies concerning matched subtype A, A/E, or E TAR and Tat have not been reported [105]. A C-to-T change at position 24 in the bulge has been identified in subtypes C, D, F, most of G bulges, and 50% of subtype A bulges examined [104]. Additionally, a T-to-C change at position 2 of the loop structure has been consistently observed in subtype C [106]. Additional functional studies need to be performed to determine the impact of structural differences that may be important in the Tat-TAR-cyclin T1 interactions. Recent investigations have expanded the understanding of Tat-TAR-cycT1 interactions and have implicated the role of Tat acetylation in modulation of transcriptional elongation [107]. Moreover, mutation analysis of the N terminal of CycT1 [108] that impairs the transcriptional activity via compromising Tat-TAR-cycT1 interactions has laid the foundation for utilizing this aspect of HIV-1 transcriptional activation in novel therapeutic intervention strategies. These studies also add new aspects that extend our understanding of HIV-1-latency; however, adaptability of HIV-1 has hampered the use of these studies to any productive end. Another major issue is that most studies tend to examine these functional aspects of HIV-1 transcription in a subtype-specific manner and studies that encompass these variables are limited. Analyzing large databases of sequence information is still a tedious process, and development of more organized tools will encourage researchers to make better progress in this area.

5. Interaction of Tat with Other Proteins Involved in Transcription

The hypophosphorylated form of RNA pol II leads to the production of short RNA molecules (30–50 nucleotides in length including the entire length of the TAR sequence) as a result of premature termination of transcription. However, phosphorylation of the CTD of RNA pol II has been shown to prevent premature termination and promote the efficient elongation and production of full-length HIV-1 RNA transcripts [109]. Phosphorylation of the CTD of RNA pol II has also been shown to be important for the clearance of mediators from RNA pol II [110] (Figure 3). Transcription factor II H (TFIIH) is a part of the preinitiation complex involved in transcription, and a number of studies have shown that there are combinatorial networks of transcription factors and cofactors, such as P-TEFb, utilized by Tat to activate and repress gene expression [107, 111]. Tat and P-TEFb are recruited to viral preinitiation complexes prior to RNA transcription and are subsequently transferred to nascent RNA after initiation. In addition to regulating HIV-1 gene expression, Tat is known to be involved in dysregulating cellular function and altering cellular gene expression profiles; however, the mechanism by which Tat affects infected cells continues to be explored.

Tat also functions as a coactivator to recruit histone acetyltransferases, including CBP/p300 and PCAF to the LTR [112]. Tat-recruited HATs presumably acetylate histones in LTR-proximal nucleosomes, remodeling nuc-1, and potentiating transcription [60, 113]. In addition, Tat itself has been shown to be a substrate for the HAT enzyme activity associated with CBP/p300 and PCAF [114118]. The HAT activity of CBP/p300 can also influence the activity of the NF- B p50 subunit. The increased acetylation of p50 leads to an increase in p50 DNA binding and the concomitant transcriptional activation of the HIV-1 promoter [119].

The SWI/SNF complex is another family of proteins that interacts with Tat and plays a role in the regulation of the HIV-1 promoter. The SWI/SNF proteins are integral components of the RNA pol II holoenzyme [120] and have the ability to disrupt DNA-histone contacts and allow access to transcriptional activators [120, 121]. In the context of HIV-1 transcription, SWI/SNF proteins are required for the transactivation ability of Tat and generation of mature full-length transcripts. Physical interaction between Tat and the remodeling subunits INI1 and Brm has also been observed [122, 123]. T cell activation by mitogenic stimuli induces recruitment of SWI/SNF complex subunits Jun-3, BRG-1, and ATF-3 [124]. In particular, BRG-1 has been shown to be recruited to the Ap1-III site located at the 3′ boundary of nuc-1 [124]. T cell activation also enhances the endogenous pools of inositol phosphate, increasing the activity of SWI/SNF by a yet-unexplained mechanism [125127].

Tat has also been shown to facilitate enhanced transcriptional initiation through protein-protein interactions with Sp1 [128] (Figure 3). Tat residues 30–55 contact Sp1 and impact DNA-PK-mediated phosphorylation of Sp1, which increases gene expression driven by the HIV-1 LTR (Figure 3) [129]. Amino acids 56–101 of Tat contain the DNA-PK-binding domain. TFIIH has been shown to be able to bind the transactivation domain of Tat and phosphorylate the CTD of RNA pol II although a number of investigative groups have shown that different subunits of TFIIH may mediate Tat binding [130]. Interestingly, the ability of TFIIH to phosphorylate RNA pol II has been shown to be significantly increased after it was bound to Tat; in turn, the transactivation ability of Tat was enhanced in the presence of TFIIH [84]. Tat has been shown to be specifically associated with Tat-associated kinase, which corresponds to the Drosophila P-TEFb, composed of cyclin T1 and CDK9. Cyclin T1 interacts directly with the activation domain of Tat and has been shown to mediate high affinity and specific binding of Tat to TAR. After Tat binding to cyclin T1, CDK9 is recruited, and then CDK9 phosphorylates CTD of RNA pol II and promotes transcription elongation. Tat is able to effectively antagonize HIV-1 latency and promote active transcription by liberating P-TEFb from an inactive 7SK RNP complex. Moreover, Tat is proposed to engage in formation of a “super elongation complex” with elongation factors like ELL2, ENL, AFF4, PAF1, and others as previously reviewed [131] (Figure 3). Meanwhile, efficient transcription elongation of the HIV-1 genome in response to Tat has been shown to lead to more Tat synthesis and generate a Tat-dependent positive feedback loop. However, mouse cyclin T1 has a cysteine-to-tyrosine substitution at position 261 that may lead to weak binding of mouse cyclin T1 to Tat, resulting in Tat losing the ability to interact with TAR, which results in low transactivation levels. However, changing the tyrosine residue back to cysteine at position 261 renders mouse cyclin T1 fully functional in Tat transactivation, demonstrating the importance of this residue in the transactivation process [132].

It has been reported that Tat is also able to interact physically with C/EBPβin vitro and in vivo [133]. Tat amino acid residues from 47 to 67 are critical for interaction with C/EBPβ, and specifically Tat increases the distribution of nuclear levels of C/EBPβ. Moreover, Tat can activate C/EBPβ in human U-373MG astroglial cells in a dose-dependent manner [134]. Recently, coexpression of Tat and C/EBPβ has been shown to enhance C/EBPβ binding to the HIV-1 LTR [135]. The N terminus of HIV-1 Tat (residues 1–26) has also been shown to bind to the transactivation domain (amino acids 1–96) within NFAT1 [136]. HIV-1 Tat enhances NFAT1-driven transcription in Jurkat T cells through a direct protein-protein interaction between the two proteins.

Tat is a robust transactivating protein that induces a number of effects by modulating the expression of many cellular and viral genes. Tat was recently shown to be associated with the promoters of PTEN and PP2A subunits, and these interactions result in activation of apoptotic pathways in HIV-1-infected CD4+ T cells [137]. These studies reinforce the fact that Tat, besides regulating the HIV-1 promoter, also affects cellular promoters. In addition to all of these interactions, Tat also interacts with a wide array of proteins, which have been summarized in Table 1. As shown here, there are a number of proteins with which Tat has been shown to interact. However, very little is known concerning a majority of these interactions and how they may or may not contribute to HIV-1 pathogenesis. This may be one reason why Tat inhibitors, discussed below, have universally failed to date to be effective in the therapeutic arena. In fact, given the large numbers of proteins already identified, future studies will undoubtedly need to take into account the interactome that Tat has with respect to the various proteins involved to truly begin to design inhibitors to attack these interactions. However, modeling this concept will be a future area that will need addressing.


Human proteinType of activity with Tat

2-5-Oligoadenylate synthetase 2 isoform 1Interacts
2-5-Oligoadenylate synthetase 3Interacts
2,3-Cyclic nucleotide 3 phosphodiesteraseActivates
2,5-Oligoadenylate synthetase 1 isoform 2Interacts
8-Oxoguanine DNA glycosylase isoform 1aUpregulates
Actin, gamma 1 propeptideInduces rearrangement of
Activated RNA polymerase II transcription cofactor 4Binds
Adaptor-related protein complex 2, alpha 1, 2 beta-1, mu-1, and sigma-1Interacts
Adenosine A2a receptorInhibited by
Adenylate cyclase 2–9Inhibits
AFF4Involved in transcription
Albumin precursorInduces release
Alpha 1 actin precursorInduces rearrangement
Alpha 1 type-I collagen preproproteinInhibits
Alpha 2 actinInduces rearrangement
Alpha 2 type-I collagenInhibits
Alpha isoform of regulatory subunit A, B55, protein phosphatase 2Modulated by
Alpha-2-macroglobulin precursorInhibits
AMP-activated protein kinase gamma 2 subunit isoform aActivates
AMP-activated protein kinase, noncatalytic gamma-1 subunit isoform 1Activates
Amyloid beta A4 protein precursor, isoform aInhibits
Annexin A2 isoform 2Downregulates
Apolipoprotein E precursorInhibited by
ATP-binding cassette subfamily B, C member 1Upregulates
ATP-dependent DNA helicase IIInteracts
ATP-dependent DNA helicase II, 70 kDa subunitInteracts
Autoantigen LaInteracts
B-cell CLL/lymphoma 11B isoform 1Binds
B-cell lymphoma 6 proteinUpregulates
B-cell lymphoma protein 2 alpha isoformInteracts
Baculoviral IAP repeat-containing protein 3Upregulates
BCL2-antagonist of cell death proteinInduces phosphorylation
BCL2-associated athanogene isoform 1LUpregulates
BCL2-associated X protein isoform betaInteracts
BCL2-like 1 isoform 1Upregulates
BCL2-like 11 isoform 6Interacts
Beta actinInduces rearrangement
Beta isoform of regulatory subunit A, B55 and B56, protein phosphatase 2 isoform aModulated by
Beta tubulin 1, class VIBinds
Beta-2-microglobulin precursorDownregulates
Bone-morphogenetic protein 1, 2 isoform 1, precursorUpregulates
Bone-morphogenetic protein receptor type-II precursorDownregulates
Brain adenylate cyclase 1Inhibits
Breast cancer antiestrogen resistance 1Induces phosphorylation
BTAF1 RNA polymerase II, B-TFIID transcription factor-associated, 170 kDaInteracts with
c-Src tyrosine kinaseActivates
Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IDownregulates
Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IIA, IIB isoform 1Inhibits
cAMP-responsive element-binding protein 1 isoform AActivates
cAMP-responsive element modulator isoform vActivates
cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit beta isoform 1Activates
cAMP-dependent protein kinase, regulatory subunit alpha 1 and beta 2Activates
cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase 4DActivates
Cardiac muscle alpha actin 1 proproteinInduces rearrangement
Caspase 3 preproproteinActivates
Caspase 8 isoform A precursorUpregulates
CC chemokine receptor 3Binds
CCAAT/enhancer binding proteinBinds
CCAAT/enhancer binding protein betaBinds
CD180 antigenDownregulates
CD28 antigenInteracts
CD3D antigen, delta polypeptide isoform A precursorInteracts
CD3E antigen, epsilon polypeptide (TiT3 complex)Interacts
CD3G gamma precursorInteracts
CD4 antigen precursorUpregulates
CD40 antigen isoform 1 precursorUpregulates
Cell division cycle 2 protein isoform 1Interacts
Cell division cycle 20 and 25C proteinDownregulates
Cell division cycle 37 proteinRegulated by
Cell division cycle 6 proteinInteracts
Chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 4 (delta)Interacts
Chemokine (C motif) ligand 1, 3, 7Upregulates
Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 1Modulates
Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2 isoform BBinds
Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 4Upregulated by
Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5Upregulates
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 12 (stromal cell-derived factor 1) isoform betaInteracts
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 3Inhibits
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 isoform bBinds
Chemokine (C-X3-C motif) ligand 1Inhibited by
Chemokine C-C motif ligand 4 isoform 1 precursorUpregulates
Chromobox homolog 5 (HP1 alpha homolog, Drosophila)Inactivates
Class II transactivatorInhibits
Claudin 1Downregulates
Claudin 5Downregulates
Cleavage and polyadenylation specific factor 3, 73 kDaUpregulates
Cofactor of BRCA1Associates with
Cofilin 1 (nonmuscle)Downregulates
Cofilin 2 (muscle)Downregulates
Collagen, type-III, alpha 1 preproproteinUpregulates
Colony-stimulating factor 2 precursorUpregulates
Complement component 1 inhibitor precursorUpregulates
Complement component 1, q subcomponent-binding protein precursorBinds
Core histone macro-H2A2.2Binds
CREB-binding protein isoform aBinds
CREB3: cAMP-responsive element binding protein 3 (luman)Inhibited by
CTD (carboxy-terminal domain, RNA polymerase II, polypeptide A) phosphatase, subunit 1 isoform FCP1aBinds
CXCL16Interacts
Cyclin A, A1, E1Interacts
Cyclin B1Upregulates
Cyclin C isoform aInteracts
Cyclin D1Downregulates
Cyclin D3Interacts
Cyclin HBinds
Cyclin T1Binds
Cyclin T2 isoform aBinds
Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 isoform 1Enhances
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4Interacts
Cyclin-dependent kinase 5Downregulates
Cyclin-dependent kinase 7Binds
Cyclin-dependent kinase 8Interacts
Cyclin-dependent kinase 9Binds
Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1AActivates
Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1BInteracts
Cytochrome cInduces release of
Cytoplasmic nuclear factor of activated T cells 3 isoform 1Activates
Cytoplasmic nuclear factor of activated T cells 4Activates
Delta isoform of regulatory subunit B56, protein phosphatase 2A isoform 1Modulated by
Dicer1Interacts
Dipeptidyl peptidase IVInhibits
DiubiquitinUbiquitinated by
DNA-dependent protein kinaseModulates HIV gene expression
DNA-directed RNA polymerase II polypeptidesInteracts
DNA polymerase epsilon catalytic subunitInteracts
DNA-damage-inducible transcript 3Enhanced by
DNA-directed RNA polymerase III 39 kDa polypeptide FActivates
Dopamine transporterInhibits
Downregulator of transcription 1Inhibits
E1A-binding protein p300Complexes with
E2F transcription factor 1Inhibited by
E2F transcription factor 4Recruits
Early growth response 1, 2, 3Binds
Egr-1 in astrocytesTat-mediated toxicity in astrocytes
Elongation factor RNA polymerase IIInteracts
Elongin B isoform aInteracts
Endonuclease G precursorActivates
Endothelial differentiation-related factor 1 isoform alphaDownregulates
Endothelin 1Upregulates
Enolase 1Inhibits
EP300Binds
Epidermal growth factor (beta urogastrone)Interacts
Epsilon isoform of regulatory subunit B56, protein phosphatase 2AModulated by
Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1, 2Interacts
Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2-alpha kinase 2Interacts
Excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 2 proteinBinds
Excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 3Binds
Fas ligandInteracts
Fc fragment of IgG, low affinity IIIa, receptor for (CD16)Inhibits
Fibroblast growth factor 1 (acidic) isoform 1 precursorUpregulates
Fibronectin 1 isoform 3 preproproteinCompetes with
Fms-related tyrosine kinase 1 (vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor receptor) Binds
Furin preproproteinCleaved by
Galectin 3Upregulates
Gamma isoform of regulatory subunit B55, protein phosphatase 2 isoform aRegulated by
Gastrointestinal glutathione peroxidase 2Modulates
GATA-binding protein 2Synergizes with
GCN5 general control of amino-acid synthesis 5-like 2Binds
Gelsolin isoform a precursorDownregulates
General transcription factor iib, e, f, and hInteracts
General transcription factor IIIC, polypeptide 1, alpha 220 kDaActivates
GLI-Kruppel family member GLI2Synergizes with
Glial fibrillary acidic proteinUpregulates
Glucocerebrosidase precursorInteracts
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase isoform aActivates
Glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl-D-aspartate 3A, 3BActivates
Glutamate receptor, metabotropic 1Activates
Glutathione peroxidase 1 isoform 1, 4, 5, 6, 7Downregulates
Glutathione synthetaseModulates
Glycogen synthase kinase 3 betaActivates
Glycophorin A precursorDownregulates
Granulin precursorBinds
Grb2Binds through SH3 domains
Growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 isoform 1Recruits
Growth hormone 1 isoform 1Inhibited by
H2A histone family membersBinds
H2B histone family membersBinds
H3 histone family membersBinds
H4 histone family membersBinds
Heat shock 70 kDa proteinsRegulated by
Heparan sulfate proteoglycan 2Interacts
HeparanaseInteracts
Hexamethylene bis-acetamide inducible 1, 2Inhibited by
Histone 1, h2adBinds
Histone 2, H4Binds
Histone deacetylase 1Inhibited by
Histone h2aBinds
Histone H2ABinds
Histone H2BBinds
Histone H4Binds
HIV TAT specific factor 1Stimulated by
HIV-1 Tat interactive protein 2, 30 kDaStimulates
HIV-1 Tat interactive protein, 60 kDa isoform 1Binds
HMT1 hnRNP methyltransferase-like 6Methylated by
Human immunodeficiency virus type-I enhancer binding protein 1Enhanced by
Inhibitor of DNA-binding 1 isoform aUpregulates
Ini1/hSNF5Interacts
Inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor, type 1, 2, 3Interacts
Insulin-like growth factor 1 (somatomedin C)Inhibited by
Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 4 precursorBinds
Integrin alpha 3 isoform a precursorActivates
Integrin alpha 5 precursorBinds
Integrin alpha L precursorInhibits
Integrin beta 1 isoform 1A precursorInteracts
Integrin beta 4 isoform 1 precursorInteracts
Integrin beta chain, beta 3 precursorInteracts
Integrin, beta 2 precursorInhibits
Integrin, beta 5Interacts
Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 precursorInteracts
Interferon regulatory factor 1Binds
Interferon regulatory factor 7 isoform aUpregulates
Interferon-stimulated gene 20 kDaUpregulates
Interferon-induced protein 35Upregulates
Interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 3Upregulates
Interferon-induced, hepatitis C-associated microtubular aggregate proteinUpregulates
Interferon, alpha 1Interacts
Interferon, alpha-inducible protein (clone IFI-15 K)Upregulates
Interferon, alpha-inducible protein 27Upregulates
Interferon, beta 1, fibroblastInteracts
Interferon, gammaInhibited by
Interferon, gamma-inducible protein 16Upregulates
Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist isoform 2Upregulates
Interleukin 1 receptor, type I precursorUpregulates
Interleukin 1, alpha proproteinDownregulates
Interleukin 1, beta proproteinDownregulates
Interleukin 10 precursorInhibited by
Interleukin 12A precursorDownregulates
Interleukin 12B precursorDownregulates
Interleukin 13 precursorInduces release of
Interleukin 16 isoform 1 precursorInhibited by
Interleukin 19 isoform 1 precursorUpregulates
Interleukin 2 precursorDownregulates
Interleukin 2 receptor beta precursorDownregulates
Interleukin 2 receptor, alpha chain precursorUpregulates
Interleukin 20 precursorUpregulates
Interleukin 3 precursorUpregulates
Interleukin 4 isoform 1 precursorInteracts
Interleukin 6 (interferon, beta 2)Activated by
Interleukin 6 receptor isoform 1 precursorUpregulates
Interleukin 7 precursorInhibits
Interleukin 7 receptor precursorInhibits
Interleukin 8 precursorDownregulates
Jun oncogeneBinds
Karyopherin beta 1Binds
Kinase insert domain receptor (a type-III receptor tyrosine kinase)Interacts with
Kinesin family member 2CDownregulates
Kruppel-like factor 9Enhanced by
Lactate dehydrogenase ADownregulates
Lactate dehydrogenase BDownregulates
Lamin A/C isoform 1 precursorBinds
Lamin B1Binds
Lamin B2Binds
Laminin alpha 5Upregulates
Laminin subunit beta 3 precursorUpregulates
Laminin, alpha 1 precursorUpregulates
Laminin, alpha 4 precursorUpregulates
Laminin, beta 1 precursorUpregulates
Laminin, beta 2 precursorUpregulates
Laminin, beta 4Upregulates
Laminin, gamma 1 precursorUpregulates
Laminin, gamma 2 isoform a precursorUpregulates
Laminin, gamma 3 precursorUpregulates
Low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III-B precursorInhibits
Low-density lipoprotein-related protein 1Binds
LSD1/KDM1Modulates transcription
Lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase precursorActivates
Lymphotoxin alpha precursorUpregulates
MAD, mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 6Downregulates
Major histocompatibility complex, class IDownregulates
Major histocompatibility complex, class IIDownregulates
Manganese superoxide dismutase isoform A precursorDownregulates
Mannose receptor C type-1 precursorDownregulates
Mannose receptor C type 2Downregulates
Matrix metalloproteinaseActivates
Menage a trois 1 (CAK assembly factor)Binds
MetallothioneinsUpregulates
Methyltransferase-like protein 1 isoform aDownregulates
Microtubule-associated deacetylase HDAC6Tat acetylation and transactivation
Mitogen-activated protein kinasesActivates
Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 3Inhibited by
Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4Inhibited by
Mouse double minute 2 homolog isoform MDM2Regulated by
Myc protooncogene proteinUpregulates
MyoD family inhibitor domain containing isoform p40Binds
Myxovirus resistance protein 1Upregulates
Nasal embryonic LHRH factorAssociates with
Nerve growth factor, beta polypeptide precursorInhibits
Neutrophil cytosolic factor 1Interacts
Nitric oxide synthase 2A isoform 1Inhibits
Nitric oxide synthase 3 (endothelial cell)Upregulates
NMDA receptor 1 isoformsActivates
Notch 2 preproproteinInteracts
Nrf2 transcription factorFusion to Tat
Nuclear factor I/C isoform 1Synergizes with
Nuclear factor kappa-B, subunit 1Interacts
Nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytosolic component 1 isoform AActivates
Nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 2 isoform BBinds
Nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B cellsActivates
Nuclear receptor coactivator 1 isoform 1Stimulates
Nuclear receptor coactivator 2Stimulates
Nuclear receptor coactivator 3 isoform aEnhanced by
Nuclear receptor subfamily 2, group F, member 1Interacts
Nuclease-sensitive element binding protein 1Binds
Nucleophosmin 1 isoform 1Binds
Nucleosome assembly protein 1Interacts
P-TEFbBinds
p21-activated kinase 1Interacts
p300/CBP-associated factorInteracts
p65Binds
Paired mesoderm homeobox 1 isoform pmx-1aDownregulates
Pancreas-enriched phospholipase CActivates
PaxillinInduces phosphorylation of
Phorbolin 1Upregulates
Phosphatase and tensin homologDownregulates
PhosphodiesterasesActivates
Phosphoinositide-3-kinasesInteracts with
Phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C beta 1 isoform aActivates
Phospholipase C isoformsActivates
Plasma glutathione peroxidase 3 precursorDownregulates
Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1Modulates
Platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase, isoform Ib, alpha subunit (45kDa)Interacts
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family, member 1Regulates
Poly(A) polymerase alphaRegulates
Poly(A) polymerase beta (testis specific)Regulates
Poly(A) polymerase gammaRegulates
Polymerase (DNA directed), betaUpregulates
Polymerase (RNA) III (DNA directed) polypeptidesActivates
Polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 2Interacts
Polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1 isoform aInteracts
POU domain, class 2, transcription factor 1Binds
PRF1: perforin 1 (pore forming protein)Downregulates
Prion protein preproproteinUpregulates
PRKC, apoptosis, WT1, regulatorUpregulates
Programmed cell death 11Modulated by
Proliferating cell nuclear antigenInteracts
Promyelocytic leukemia protein isoform 1Regulated by
Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 precursorUpregulates
Proteasome (prosome, macropain) 26S subunit, non-ATPase, 6Interacts
Proteasome (prosome, macropain) activator subunit 4Interacts
Proteasome 26S ATPase subunitsInteracts
Proteasome 26S non-ATPase subunitsInteracts
Proteasome activator subunitsInteracts
Proteasome alpha subunitsInteracts
Proteasome beta subunitsInteracts
Proteasome inhibitor subunit 1 isoform 1Interacts
Protein kinase CActivates
Protein kinase DRegulated by
Protein kinase, camp dependentActivates
Protein kinase, DNA-activated, catalytic polypeptideBinds
Protein phosphatase 1Through Cdk9 phosphorylation
Protein phosphatase 1 regulatory inhibitor subunit 8 isoform alphaBinds
Protein phosphatase 1, catalytic subunitsBinds
Protein phosphatase 2, catalytic subunitsModulated by
Protein phosphatase 3, catalytic subunitsActivates
Protein tyrosine phosphatase, nonreceptor type 23Upregulates
Protooncogene tyrosine-protein kinase SRCActivates
PTK2 protein tyrosine kinase 2 isoform aActivates
PTK2B protein tyrosine kinase 2 beta isoform aInduces phosphorylation
Purine-rich element-binding protein ABinds
RAD51 homolog protein isoform 1Interacts
RAN-binding protein 5Binds
Ras homolog gene family, member AActivates
Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 isoform Rac1Activates
Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 2Activates
RD RNA-binding proteinAssociates
RelBThrough inhibition of tnfα
Replication factor C2 (40 kDa) isoform 1Interacts
Replication factor C3 isoform 1Interacts
Replication factor C4Interacts
Replication factor C5 isoform 1Interacts
Replication factor C large subunitInteracts
Replication protein A1, 70 kDaInteracts
Reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homolog BInteracts
Retinoblastoma 1Inhibited by
Retinoblastoma-like 2 (p130)Binds
Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI) alphaDownregulates
Ribosomal protein L3 isoform aInteracts
RNA guanylyltransferase and 5-phosphataseBinds
RNA polymerase II, polypeptide HActivates
S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 isoform 1Enhanced by
Secretoglobin, family 2A, member 2Upregulates
Selectin E precursorUpregulates
Semaphorin 4DUpregulates
SHC (Src homology 2 domain containing) transforming protein 1 isoform p52ShcInduces phosphorylation of
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 isoform alphaUpregulates
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 isoform 2Activates
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 6Interacts
Single-stranded DNA-binding protein 1Upregulates
Sirtuin 1Regulated by
SKI-interacting proteinAssociates
SKIPInteracts through c-Myc and Menin
Small GTPase protein E-RasActivates
Small inducible cytokine precursorsInhibits
Small inducible cytokine subfamily E, member 1Upregulates
Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptideStimulated by
Solute carrier family 22, member 1 isoform aRegulated by
Solute carrier family 5 (sodium/glucose cotransporter), member 1Inhibits
Solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter, dopamine), member 3Downregulates
Sp1 transcription factorInteracts
SP110 nuclear body protein isoform aUpregulates
Sp3 transcription factor isoform 1Interacts
Sp4 transcription factorInteracts
Spermidine/spermine N1 acetyltransferaseUpregulates
Splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 1 isoform 1Inhibits
Splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 7Inhibits
Squamous cell carcinoma antigen recognized by T cells 3Regulated by
SRB7 suppressor of RNA polymerase B homologInteracts
Src homology 2 domain containing transforming protein C3Induces phosphorylation
Succinate dehydrogenase complex, subunit B, iron sulfur (Ip)Binds
Superoxide dismutase 1, solubleDownregulates
Superoxide dismutase 3, extracellular precursorDownregulates
Suppressor of Ty 4 homolog 1Activated by
Suppressor of Ty 5 homologStimulated by
SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, and actin-dependent regulator of chromatinBinds
Syndecan 1–4 precursorsBinds
T-box 21Upregulates
T-cell receptor zeta chain isoform 1 precursorInteracts
TAF12 RNA polymerase II, TATA box-binding protein (TBP)-associated factor, 20 kDaInteracts
TAF9 RNA polymerase II isoform aInteracts
TAR DNA-binding proteinInhibited by
TAR RNA-binding protein 1Regulates
TAR RNA-binding protein 2 isoform aSynergizes
TAT-interactive protein, 72 kDaBinds
TATA box-binding proteinInteracts
TATA box-binding protein-associated factor 2FInteracts
TBP-1 interacting protein isoform 2Inhibited by
TBP-associated factorsInteracts
Telomerase reverse transcriptase isoform 1Downregulates
Testis-specific histone H2BBinds
TFIIA alpha, p55 isoform 1Stabilizes
TH1-like proteinAssociates
Thrombospondin 1 precursorBinds
Thyroid hormone receptor, alpha isoform 2Binds
Tight junction protein 2 (zona occludens 2) isoform 1Downregulates
Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 precursorInteracts
Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 precursorInteracts
TNF receptor-associated factor 4Inhibited by
Transcription elongation factor A (SII), 3Interacts
Transcription elongation factor A1 isoform 1Interacts
Transcription elongation factor A protein 2 isoform aInteracts
Transcription elongation regulator 1 isoform 1Associates with
Transcription factor 3Regulated by
Transcription factor 4 isoform bInhibits
Transcription factor 7-like 2 (T-cell specific, HMG-box)Regulated by
Transcription factor AP-4 (activating enhancer binding protein 4)Regulated by
Transcription factor CP2Inhibited by
Transforming growth factor, alphaUpregulates
Transforming growth factor, beta 1Inhibited by
Transforming growth factor, beta 2Upregulates
Transporter 1, ATP-binding cassette, subfamily BUpregulates
Transportin 1Binds
Tripartite motif-containing 22Inhibited by
TUBB4Q: tubulin, beta polypeptide 4, member QDownregulates
Tubulin alpha 6Binds
Tubulin, alpha 1Binds
Tubulin, alpha 1aBinds
Tubulin, alpha 2 isoform 1Binds
Tubulin, alpha 4Binds
Tubulin, alpha 8Binds
Tubulin, alpha, ubiquitousBinds
Tubulin, betaDownregulates
Tubulin, beta 2Binds
Tubulin, beta 2BDownregulates
Tubulin, beta 4Binds
Tubulin, beta 6Binds
Tubulin, beta 8Binds
Tubulin, beta, 2Binds
Tubulin, beta, 4Binds
Tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 10Inhibits
Tumor necrosis factor alphaInteracts
Tumor necrosis factor receptorsUpregulates
Tumor protein p53Binds
Tumor protein p73Binds
Tyrosine hydroxylase isoform bDownregulates
Ubiquitin B precursorUbiquitinated by
Ubiquitin CUbiquitinated by
Ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1Ubiquitinated by
Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2D 1Ubiquitinated by
Upstream-binding protein 1 (LBP-1a)Inhibits
Urokinase plasminogen activator preproproteinUpregulates
V-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 2Activates
V-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 3 isoform 1Activates
V-fos FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homologInteracts
V-Ha-ras Harvey rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog isofrom 1Activates
V-rel reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homologInteracts
Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 isoform a precursorUpregulates
Vascular endothelial growth factor A isoform b precursorCooperates with
Vitronectin precursorCompetes with
Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome candidate 2 proteinDownregulates
YY1 transcription factorInhibited by
Zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7ABinds

6. Molecular Diversity in Tat

The high level of HIV sequence diversity generated during the course of HIV disease is, for the most part, due to the error-prone nature and low fidelity of reverse transcriptase, poor proofreading by the polymerase, and selective pressures exerted by the host immune response, combination antiretroviral chemotherapy, and perhaps other physiological pressures [3, 102, 138]. The HIV-1 genotypic variants and resultant phenotypes occur as important variables of viral replication during the course of the disease [139]. It has been reported that Tat can tolerate 38% sequence variation without any change in its transactivation potential [140].

Both blood-derived and brain-derived HIV-1 viruses show immense molecular heterogeneity between patients and HIV-1 subtypes [53]. The LTR and several HIV-1 genes including [tat], [env] (gp120 and gp41), [nef], and [vpr] have been linked to the pathogenesis of HIV-related neurologic disease [141]. The molecular diversity of HIV-1 Tat protein isolated from brains of patients infected with different HIV-1 subtypes has been examined. Recent studies examining Tat proteins representative of HIV-1 subtype B, C, and BF recombinants have demonstrated important structural and functional differences [142, 143]. BF recombinant HIV-1 isolates from Argentina appear to have a replicative advantage over subtype B isolates, possibly due to the differential ability of Tat to interact with the LTR. Subtype C Tat has been shown to be more highly ordered than subtype B Tat. In addition, subtype C Tat protein has been demonstrated to be consistently inferior to subtype B Tat in biological assays with respect to its ability to promote viral proliferation, induce TNF- and IL-6 expression, and upregulate chemokine coreceptor expression [142]. However, studies have also shown that HIV-1 subtype C Tat exhibits greater transcriptional activity in the Jurkat CD4+ T cell line compared with subtypes B and E and that this higher level of transactivation is not LTR sequence dependent but rather because of variations in the C-Tat sequence at amino acid residues 57 (Arg in B and E, and Ser in C) and 63 (Glu in B, E, and C), which are within and close to the basic domain, respectively [144]. In addition, in HIV-1 subtype C Tat, a serine residue replaces a cysteine at position 31. This variation affects the biological function of Tat, resulting in a deficient chemoattractant activity, low ability to bind to chemokine receptor 2, and reduced ability to stimulate TNF- production [142, 145, 146] without affecting Tat transactivation. More recently, signature pattern analysis identified five amino acid positions in Tat (21A, 24N, 29K, 40K, and 60Q) that contained signature residues unique for Indian HIV-1C [147]. Interestingly in the eight patients analyzed to date in the DREXELMED HIV/AIDS Genetic Analysis Cohort [148], which contains mostly subtype B-infected patients, all of the Tat sequences analyzed contain these important cysteines (data not shown). Some length variation in exon 2 and the absence of a critical cysteine in the cysteine-rich domain have also been found in subtype C Tat [106]. When one compares the structural and functional differences between subtypes B and C Tat proteins [142], subtype C Tat may have a relatively higher ordered structure and be less flexible than subtype B Tat. Analysis of subtype D Tat sequences revealed an in-frame stop codon in exon 2, which results in removal of the 13–16 amino acids from the C terminus of Tat [103, 149, 150]. Thus, emerging data encompassing the structure and function of the Tat protein across different subtypes have enabled us to better understand Tat-mediated effects. However, additional studies need to be performed to truly delineate the complexity of Tat. To accomplish this more sequencing data for all subtypes will have to be obtained to allow an even deeper understanding of how and why genetic variation evolves and what are the driving forces in this evolution especially on genes like tat that are not directly affected by antiretroviral therapy and therefore have direct selective pressures. The power of having large data sets can be demonstrated in a recent study which has identified two residues in Tat, positions 35 and 39, which appear to be coevolved. These residues, however, have two distinct functions with respect to the transactivation of the HIV-1 LTR-binding P-TEFb and promoting P-TEFb phosphorylation of the C-terminal domain in RNAPII, respectively [151]. In addition, understanding the genetic diversity of Tat in multiple subtypes has become and will continue to be increasingly important as vaccines in development will need to account for immunity to all of these variations.

7. Tat Genetic Variation and HIV-1-Associated Neurological Disorders

In addition to transactivation of the viral LTR, Tat exhibits a range of biological properties relative to HIV-1 pathogenesis [152], including the intracellular regulation of host gene expression to facilitate viral production as well as the extracellular detrimental effects on the cells of the immune and nervous systems. HIV-1 induces pathological consequences in a number of end organs including the brain [7, 153]. More than 30% of AIDS patients suffer from some form of HIV-1-induced neurological impairment including HIV-1-associated dementia (HAD) as well as other more subtle minor neurocognitive disorders [154, 155]. Despite the widespread use of highly active antiretroviral therapy and the resultant decrease in the incidence of HAD, the prevalence of HAD and other milder forms of HIV-related neurological disease has become increasingly common problems with respect to the clinical management of HIV/AIDS [156]. In particular, Tat has been implicated in the pathogenesis of HIV-associated neurological disease including HAD via a variety of mechanisms [157]. The neurotoxicity of Tat is further supported by the observation that the mRNA levels for Tat are elevated in brain extracts of patients with HAD [158]. Tat has been shown to act as an intracellular and extracellular mediator of neurotoxicity and to play a critical role in contributing to neurological injury in HAD [159]. Tat protein is secreted by HIV-1-infected cells and acts by diffusing through the cell membrane. It appears to act as a secreted, soluble neurotoxin and induces HIV-1-infected macrophages and microglia to release neurotoxic substances [160162]. Some Tat variants have been reported to be dysfunctional with respect to LTR transactivation and may contribute to viral latency under certain conditions while still being able to stimulate the transcription of a number of cytokine genes [95]. Tat can also cooperate with cellular factors to enhance the neurotoxic effects on host cells [163]. Tat and cytokines IFN-γ and TNF-α have also been demonstrated to synergistically increase expression of CXCL10 in human astrocytes, which provide an important reservoir for the generation of inflammatory mediators, for instance, CXCL10 as a neurotoxin and a chemoattractant [164].

Phylogenetic analyses of Tat sequences from patients with and without HAD have shown clustering of sequences with respect to clinical diagnosis of neurological impairment as well as tissue of origin [165, 166]. Comparisons of matched brain and spleen-derived Tat sequences have suggested that greater sequence homology exists among brain-derived Tat clones than that observed between brain and spleen-derived clones [166]. Another study also showed sequence variations within patients segregated as CNS and non-CNS tat genes [167]. Additionally, significant sequence heterogeneity exists within brain-derived Tat in domains associated with viral replication and intracellular transport [166]. Nonsynonymous versus synonymous mutation rates among brain-derived Tat sequences isolated from patients with neurocognitive impairment were shown to be significantly greater than those isolated from patients without clinical evidence of neurological disease [165]. Importantly, most of the mutations present in the HAD-associated Tat sequences were located in the augmenting region (residues 57–78 amino acids), which affects viral replication. Interestingly, in these studies, variations at position 74 and 100 were correlated to Tat sequences isolated from brain-derived sequences. Collectively, results from these studies suggest that differing selective pressures act on individual HIV-1 genes within the CNS and that this differential selective pressure may influence both the development and subsequent severity of neurocognitive impairment.

Participants in a current longitudinal study of patients in the DREXELMED HIV/AIDS Genetic Analysis Cohort have had their LTR and their env and tat genes and proteins, where appropriate, analyzed from peripehral blood. The LTR was analyzed as a result of previous studies that identified the potential for single nucleotide polymorphisms in the LTR to be predictive of neurocognitive impairment [168170]. Patients within the DREXELMED HIV/AIDS Genetic Analysis Cohort are followed longitudinally, with scheduled visits every 6 months. At each visit, patients are interviewed for clinical and social history, a blood sample is collected, and neurocognitive status is evaluated with a minineurological exam [171]. Recently, eight patients were analyzed with respect to Tat genetic variation. Longitudinal analyses of these 8 patients showed 7 of the patients had exhibited NI at some point in their clinical history; of these 7 patients, 3 patients had current NI and all 3 had Tat containing a change at amino acid position 100 (amino acid 100). Of the remaining 4 patients, 2 had the change at amino acid 100 with their following visit showing NI; the final 2 did not have a change at amino acid 100; however, these patients were lost to follow up for 23–36 months, at which time they presented with NI. The one patient without NI did not have a change at amino acid 100. Given the previous studies, which have identified this amino acid position as indicative of brain-derived sequences, this observation may point to the fact that a change at this amino acid position may occur in the periphery in patients before the onset of NI (perhaps in the HIV-1-infected monocyte-macrophage compartment).

The genetic variation observed within Tat has also been shown to alter the function of this protein and relate to pathogenesis. Importantly, HIV-1 Tat derived from HAD patients has been associated with greater neuronal death both in vitro and in vivo compared with Tat from non-HAD patients. This characteristic has been attributed, in part, to enhanced MMP-2 expression induced by brain-derived HIV-1 Tat variants [172]. Interestingly, however, these same brain-derived Tat isolates also appear to be limited in their ability to enhance viral gene expression despite the increased activation of host transcriptional machinery [173]. This observation differs from other reported studies, which showed that a subset of patients demonstrated reduced transactivation capacity of CNS-derived Tat proteins compared to those from matched lymphoid tissues; however, overall Tat proteins from the CNS, when compared to lymphoid compartments, maintained similar levels of transactivation function [167]. However, one must remember that these viral gene activation studies were all performed with a viral regulatory region derived from a non-CNS tissue source and may therefore not be naturally compatible with respect to optimal LTR activation by a Tat protein selected for CNS replication. This observation is of particular importance because previous studies [168, 174, 175] have demonstrated that LTRs derived from the CNS are likely to be structurally and functionally different from LTRs derived from other tissue sources. In fact, a current study has shown that Tat transactivates the corresponding HIV-1-infected patient-derived colinear LTR better than a non-co-linear Tat protein. These Tat clones were shown to have nonconsensus variations compared with IIIB or the consensus B sequence of Tat that might contribute to the alteration in their function [171]. Taken together, these reports point to the notion that genetic diversity of HIV-1 Tat likely contributes to the establishment and severity of HIV-1-associated neurological disease. However, additional studies of this nature are warranted. For instance, are there certain Tat residues that induce increased Tat secretion from cells both in the periphery as well as in the CNS? Are there variations that induce more neurotoxic effects? Are the Tat variants isolated from vRNA versus integrated DNA similar or different?

8. HIV-1 Tat as a Therapeutic Target

The HIV-1 Tat protein has long remained an attractive target for therapeutic intervention owing to its essential role in viral gene expression and activation of the HIV-1 LTR. As discussed before, Tat and the P-TEFb complex bind to TAR to promote efficient transcription of the full-length HIV genome. The expanding knowledge of Tat functional properties and its interactions with other cellular and viral partners has led to the identification of a varied range of compounds that can inhibit different Tat functions. The Tat and HIV-1 transactivation inhibitors fall broadly into the following categories: (1) inhibitors targeting TAR RNA (2), inhibitors targeting Tat protein, and (3) Tat-P-TEFb interaction inhibitors. In this section, we review the current status of the development of therapeutic strategies that target Tat and its functional interactions in the process of HIV-1 transcription (Table 2).


Compound/classMechanism of actionReference(s)

DRBPurine nucleoside analog; inhibits cyclin-dependent kinases[23]
Flavopiridol (flavonoids)Inhibits cyclin-dependent kinases[24]
SeliciclibInhibits cyclin-dependent kinases[25]
2-O-Methyl/LNA oligoribonucleotidesBinds TAR[26]
Phosphodiester/phophothiote oligonucleotidesBinds TAR[27]
PNA-(TAR-16)Polyamide nucleotide analog; binds TAR[28]
AcetylpromazineBinds 5 bulge of TAR[29]
O,O-Bismyristoyl thiamine disulfideInhibits nuclear translocation of Tan and NF-κB, via interaction with cysteine region[30]
Cyclic peptidesMimics basic region and binds TAR[31]
Tat 9-K-biotin peptideBinds TAR[32]
CGP64222Peptoid/peptide similar to Tat-basic domain; binds TAR[33]
CGP40336A (polyamine-acridine based)Binds TAR[34]
Aminoglycoside-arginine conjugatesBinds TAR in the major groove of the bulge and upper portion of the stem[35]
Transdominant Tat mutantsBinds TAR[36]
Biscationic diphenylfuran derivativesBinds TAR[35]
Neomycin (aminoglycoside)Binds TAR, CXCR4, and other Tat targets[37]
D-penicillamineBinds Tat stably through cysteine residues[38]
Stilbene (CGA137053)Binds Tat directly[39]
Suramin and derivativesCompetes with heparin/heparin sulfate for binding to the basic region of Tat; inhibits extracellular functions of Tat[40]
Benzodiazepine derivativesGeneral inhibition of HIV-1 transcription and Tat transactivation[41, 42]
Benzothiophene derivatives[43]
Temacrazine (bistriazolonoacridones)[44]
Fluoroquinolone derivatives[45, 46]

Compounds against the TAR RNA are the most numerous because they would block the primary functional interaction of Tat in the process of HIV-1 transcription. In this category, the compounds can be broadly divided into three classes: (1) peptide based, (2) oligonucleotide based, and (3) small-molecule based (for more detailed information refer to a previously published review [176]). It is well established that the arginine-rich motif of the Tat protein is required for it to bind to the TAR RNA trinucleotide bulge region [15, 90, 177]. Peptides corresponding to this region were found to compete for Tat binding and were shown to inhibit HIV-1 replication [32, 178]. Compounds directly binding to the three-base bulge of TAR RNA include 6-aminoquinolone [179, 180], quinoxaline-2, 3-diones [181], pyridine oxide derivatives such as JPL-32 [182, 183], and acridine derivatives such as CGP64222 and CGP40336A [33, 34]. All of these compounds exhibit strong inhibition of the Tat-TAR interaction by binding to the three-base bulge of TAR RNA. The peptide CGP64222 was later shown also to interact with CXCR4 [184], the chemokine receptor that acts as a coreceptor for the X4 or dual tropic HIV-1 strains. Other drugs that specifically interact with the bulge in TAR RNA include biscationic diphenylfuran derivatives and a new class of polyamine-acridine-based compounds [34, 185]. Aminoglycoside antibiotics such as neomycin and streptomycin and neamine and its derivatives have been shown to specifically bind RNA molecules and to block the conformation of the Tat-TAR complex by targeting the structure of TAR RNA [181, 186, 187]. Besides the aforementioned Tat-TAR inhibition strategies, the developments in the field of RNA interference have yet to be applied in full force for achieving a more targeted inhibition [188, 189].

Compounds binding directly to the Tat protein could inhibit HIV-1 replication. To achieve this goal, targeting the basic domain of Tat would be relevant because this very domain is required for nuclear localization, transactivation through TAR binding, and also for extracellular release and cellular uptake [190, 191]. It has been shown that, in the extracellular compartment, the basic domain of Tat can be targeted by several polyanions [192] such as heparin and heparan sulfates [40], thrombospondin [193], polysulfonated distamycin A derivatives [194], and sulfated polysaccharides [195], thereby blocking its internalization and also its extracellular activities. Another compound targeting Tat is the negatively charged polyacrylic acid, which could inhibit the Tat-TAR interaction with high affinity to Tat peptide, thereby blocking HIV-1 replication [196]. Negatively charged small molecules, such as the stilbene derivative, CGA-137053, was shown to inhibit HIV-1 replication by directly binding to Tat and inhibiting the formation of the Tat-TAR complex at low nanomolar concentrations [39]. One important aspect, which must be considered, is that most of these interactions are largely due to electrostatic interactions with limited sequence specificity. Therefore, it would be highly relevant to evaluate their specificity in a relevant model system before they can be exploited in any therapeutic intervention strategy. Some transdominant-negative Tat mutants have also been shown to be potential antiviral therapeutics because they could inhibit the transactivation function of Tat, thereby inducing latency during viral infection [197200]. Moreover, various biopolymeric drugs and anti-Tat antibodies have been demonstrated to be effective in inhibiting the extracellular activity and cellular uptake of Tat protein [176, 201]. Thus, targeting specific, conserved conformational epitopes on Tat might prove to be more beneficial. This approach can be aided tremendously by the emerging structural data on Tat. Some insights have already been provided by ab initio molecular dynamic studies on the Tat NMR structure and structural conformations of TAR [202, 203]. It would also be relevant to evaluate combination drug formulations to achieve an inhibition of the functional interactions of Tat at several levels [204]. This combination approach may also facilitate strategies that use relatively lower concentrations of these compounds that might improve overall toxicity levels. It might also be useful in targeting the small pool of latently infected cells that may hinder clearing the virus from the system.

The third approach is to use the understanding of the Tat-P-TEFb interaction to develop interventions to disrupt this interaction or to reduce the stability of this complex. P-TEFb (CDK9/cyclin T1) is an essential cofactor for Tat-mediated transactivation, and selective inhibition blocks HIV-1 replication without affecting cellular transcription, thus making it a potential target for anti-HIV-1 therapy. To this end, P-TEFb inhibitors such as 5,6-dichlororibofuranosylbenzimidazole, a purine nucleoside analogue; flavopiridol, a small molecular cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor [23, 24]; Seliciclib, an inhibitior of CDK2/cyclin E and/or P-TEFb [25] have been evaluated in various in vitro studies and have been shown to effectively reduce HIV-1 replication. However, long-term HIV-1 replication studies showed that these inhibitors were more cytotoxic and less efficacious against HIV-1 in the primary cell cultures [205]. The failure of these known kinase inhibitors in providing anti-HIV efficacy has prompted studies to revisit the Tat-P-TEFb complex for small molecule inhibitors. In this study, molecular dynamics simulations are being utilized to understand the nature of interactions of Tat with CDK9 and Cyclin-T1 in a dynamic mode. These interactions are further mapped on to a pharmacophore-based screening paradigm to design small molecule inhibitors that show potent HIV-1 efficacy and low toxicity (Kortagere and Wigdahl, unpublished results).

In alternative approaches, promising results were demonstrated using anti-CycT1 human single-chain antibodies that targeted the cyclin domain and the TAR recognition motif, using transiently transfected cell lines [132] and stably transfected cells [206]. Protein chimeras like fusion of a truncated human CycT1 and a mutant CDK9 protein that lacked autophosphorylation activity have demonstrated the inhibition of Tat-mediated transactivation and HIV-1 gene expression [207]. Intracellular proteins that inhibit P-TEFb-like HEXIM1 have been evaluated to suppress HIV-1 replication [208, 209]. Moreover, the inhibition of a transcriptional coactivator like PCAF has been evaluated using antibodies against the bromodomain of PCAF [210]. These studies establish a therapeutic rationale, but more specificity is desired because targeting proteins involved in cellular homeostasis and activation pathways may have detrimental effects on the cells. The same complexity applies to studies that propose targeting specific posttranslation modifications on Tat such as phosphorylation [211] and acetylation [107]. Moreover, most of these studies are done in irrelevant cell types that dilute their therapeutic promise. Another aspect that gets overlooked is that it is extremely difficult to evaluate this effect since any such intervention will have an impact on normal cellular pathways. This underscores the value of in-depth analysis of the functional interactions in the HIV-1 replication paradigm because it would yield more specific targets with minimal host toxicity. Another aspect that has not been investigated in detail is the genetic variations observed within the Tat-coding sequences and how they might impact the structure and function of this vital transactivator. Efforts in our laboratory and others have indicated variation in the transactivation potential of different Tat sequences from HIV-1-infected patients (unpublished observations). Moreover, it has been established that sequence variation within specific domains of Tat was associated with increased viral replication and TNF- production [141, 166, 212, 213]. These observations along with results that have shown that some Tat sequences exhibit minimal transactivation potential but have an ability to activate host gene expression [173] provide new directions where this aspect of Tat sequence variability can be included in strategies directed against Tat. The ideal outcome would be to achieve a competitive inhibition by using defective Tat mutants to inhibit Tat function, but a thorough understanding selected aspects of Tat function is a prerequisite to this line of investigation. These efforts again will be aided immensely by incorporating testing that includes Tat sequence and functional information across subtypes.

9. Conclusions

More than two decades of investigations have established the central role of Tat in the activation of HIV-1 LTR. Genetic- and structure/function-based studies have enabled us to understand the functional intricacies of Tat-dependent functions. All of these studies have motivated a number of researchers to use Tat as an important target in combination antiretroviral therapies, but to date none of these have materialized into clinically effective antiviral agents. One crippling factor has been the inability to assess the functions of Tat in relevant systems at a concentration that would be closer to that encountered in vivo. Concentrating efforts in a direction to elucidate the protein-protein interactome established by Tat will go a long way toward targeting specific breakpoints in HIV-1 pathogenesis. Isolation of mutant sequences of Tat from sites like the brain can also be used to identify tissue-specific functions of Tat that may have great bearing on long-term use of Tat inhibitors. Moreover, it would be an important effort to consolidate studies concerning the structural information and functional interactions of Tat across different HIV subtypes and use this information to increase the spectrum of subtypes susceptible to Tat-based therapeutic inhibitors. Eradicating latent reservoirs by the elimination of integrated HIV-1 provirus or irreversibly blocking LTR activation or Tat transactivation activity will provide the next major step forward in controlling the HIV-1 pandemic.

Authors’ Contribution

Luna Li and Satinder Dahiya contributed equally in the preparation of this paper.

Acknowledgments

M. Nonnemacher, V. Pirrone, and B. Wigdahl are supported in part by funds from the Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health through grants from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NS32092 and NS46263 (B. Wigdahl, Principal Investigator), and the National Institute of Drug Abuse, DA19807 (B. Wigdahl, Principal Investigator). Drs. M. Nonnemacher and S. Kortagere are supported by research developmental funds provided by the Department of Microbiology and Immunology and the Institute for Molecular Medicine and Infectious Disease, Drexel University College of Medicine. The authors would also like to acknowledge the editorial assistance of Pamela Fried in Academic Publishing Services of the Drexel University College of Medicine.

References

  1. J. A. Garcia, D. Harrich, E. Soultanakis, F. Wu, R. Mitsuyasu, and R. B. Gaynor, “Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 LTR TATA and TAR region sequences required for transcriptional regulation,” EMBO Journal, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 765–778, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  2. T. M. Rana and K. T. Jeang, “Biochemical and functional interactions between HIV-1 Tat protein and TAR RNA,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 365, no. 2, pp. 175–185, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley, Fields' Virology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 5th edition, 2007.
  4. K. T. Jeang, H. Xiao, and E. A. Rich, “Multifaceted activities of the HIV-1 transactivator of transcription, tat,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 41, pp. 28837–28840, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. F. Barre-Sinoussi, J. C. Chermann, and F. Rey, “Isolation of a T-lymphotropic retrovirus from a patient at risk for acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS),” Science, vol. 220, no. 4599, pp. 868–871, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  6. C. A. Rosen, J. G. Sodroski, and W. C. Goh, “Post-transcriptional regulation accounts for the trans-activation of the human T-lymphotropic virus type III,” Nature, vol. 319, no. 6054, pp. 555–559, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  7. M. Strazza, V. Pirrone, B. Wigdahl, and M. R. Nonnemacher, “Breaking down the barrier: the effects of HIV-1 on the blood-brain barrier,” Brain Research, vol. 1399, pp. 96–115, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. R. López-Huertas, S. Callejas, D. Abia et al., “Modifications in host cell cytoskeleton structure and function mediated by intracellular HIV-1 Tat protein are greatly dependent on the second coding exon,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 3287–3307, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Kuppuswamy, T. Subramanian, A. Srinivasan, and G. Chinnadurai, “Multiple functional domains of tat, the trans-activator of HIV-1, defined by mutational analysis,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 3551–3561, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  10. P. Kalantari, V. Narayan, S. K. Natarajan et al., “Thioredoxin reductase-1 negatively regulates HIV-1 transactivating protein Tat-dependent transcription in human macrophages,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 48, pp. 33183–33190, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. Dingwall, I. Ernberg, M. J. Gait et al., “Human immunodeficiency virus 1 Tat protein binds trans-activation-responsive region (TAR) RNA in vitro,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 86, no. 18, pp. 6925–6929, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  12. S. Roy, U. Delling, C. H. Chen, C. A. Rosen, and N. Sonenberg, “A bulge structure in HIV-1 TAR RNA is required for Tat binding and Tat-mediated trans-activation,” Genes and Development, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 1365–1373, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  13. K. M. Weeks and D. M. Crothers, “RNA recognition by Tat-derived peptides: interaction in the major groove?” Cell, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 577–588, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  14. S. Ruben, A. Perkins, R. Purcell et al., “Structural and functional characterization of human immunodeficiency virus Tat protein,” Journal of Virology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  15. J. Hauber, M. H. Malim, and B. R. Cullen, “Mutational analysis of the conserved basic domain of human immunodeficiency virus Tat protein,” Journal of Virology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 1181–1187, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  16. S. R. Schwarze, K. A. Hruska, and S. F. Dowdy, “Protein transduction: unrestricted delivery into all cells?” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 290–295, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. R. Schwarze and S. F. Dowdy, “In vivo protein transduction: intracellular delivery of biologically active proteins, compounds and DNA,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 45–48, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. M. Smith, S. Pentlicky, Z. Klase et al., “An in vivo replication-important function in the second coding exon of Tat is constrained against mutation despite cytotoxic T lymphocyte selection,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 45, pp. 44816–44825, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. V. Fiorelli, G. Barillari, E. Toschi et al., “IFN-γ induces endothelial cells to proliferate and to invade the extracellular matrix in response to the HIV-1 Tat protein: implications for AIDS-Kaposi's sarcoma pathogenesis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 1165–1170, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  20. G. Barillari, C. Sgadari, V. Fiorelli et al., “The Tat protein of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 promotes vascular cell growth and locomotion by engaging the α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins and by mobilizing sequestered basic fibroblast growth factor,” Blood, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 663–672, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  21. C. Neuveut, R. M. Scoggins, D. Camerini, R. B. Markham, and K. T. Jeang, “Requirement for the second coding exon of Tat in the optimal replication of macrophage-tropic HIV-1,” Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 10, no. 6, part 1, pp. 651–660, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. U. Mahlknecht, I. Dichamp, A. Varin, C. van Lint, and G. Herbein, “NF-κB-dependent control of HIV-1 transcription by the second coding exon of Tat in T cells,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 718–727, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. H. Chao, K. Fujinaga, J. E. Marion et al., “Flavopiridol inhibits P-TEFb and blocks HIV-1 replication,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 37, pp. 28345–28348, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  24. H. S. Y. Mancebo, G. Lee, J. Flygare et al., “P-TEFb kinase is required for HIV Tat transcriptional activation in vivo and in vitro,” Genes and Development, vol. 11, no. 20, pp. 2633–2644, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  25. C. Benson, J. White, J. de Bono et al., “A phase I trial of the selective oral cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor seliciclib (CYC202; R-Roscovitine), administered twice daily for 7 days every 21 days,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Arzumanov, A. P. Walsh, V. K. Rajwanshi, R. Kumar, J. Wengel, and M. J. Gait, “Inhibition of HIV-1 Tat-dependent trans activation by steric block chimeric 2'-O-methyl/LNA oligoribonucleotides,” Biochemistry, vol. 40, no. 48, pp. 14645–14654, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. T. Vickers, B. F. Baker, P. D. Cook et al., “Inhibition of HIV-LTR gene expression by oligonucleotides targeted to the TAR element,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 3359–3368, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  28. N. Kaushik, A. Basu, and V. N. Pandey, “Inhibition of HIV-1 replication by anti-trans-activation responsive polyamide nucleotide analog,” Antiviral Research, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 13–27, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. K. E. Lind, Z. Du, K. Fujinaga, B. M. Peterlin, and T. L. James, “Structure-based computational database screening, in vitro assay, and NMR assessment of compounds that target TAR RNA,” Chemistry and Biology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 185–193, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Shoji, K. Furuishi, A. Ogata et al., “An allosteric drug, o,o'-bismyristoyl thiamine disulfide, suppresses HIV-1 replication through prevention of nuclear translocation of both HIV-1 Tat and NF-κB,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 249, no. 3, pp. 745–753, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. Friedler, D. Friedler, N. W. Luedtke, Y. Tor, A. Loyter, and C. Gilon, “Development of a functional backbone cyclic mimetic of the HIV-1 Tat arginine-rich motif,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 31, pp. 23783–23789, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. I. Choudhury, J. Wang, A. B. Rabson et al., “Inhibition of HIV-1 replication by a Tat RNA-binding domain peptide analog,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 104–111, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  33. F. Hamy, E. R. Felder, G. Heizmann et al., “An inhibitor of the Tat/TAR RNA interaction that effectively suppresses HIV-1 replication,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 3548–3553, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. F. Hamy, V. Brondani, A. Flörsheimer, W. Stark, M. J. J. Blommers, and T. Klimkait, “A new class of HIV-1 Tat antagonist acting through Tat-TAR inhibition,” Biochemistry, vol. 37, no. 15, pp. 5086–5095, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. N. Gelus, C. Bailly, F. Hamy, T. Klimkait, W. D. Wilson, and D. W. Boykin, “Inhibition of HIV-1 Tat-TAR interaction by diphenylfuran derivatives: effects of the terminal basic side chains,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1089–1096, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. L. Pearson, J. Garcia, F. Wu, N. Modesti, J. Nelson, and R. Gaynor, “A transdominant Tat mutant that inhibits Tat-induced gene expression from the human immunodeficiency virus long terminal repeat,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 13, pp. 5079–5083, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Litovchick, A. Lapidot, M. Eisenstein, A. Kalinkovich, and G. Borkow, “Neomycin B-arginine conjugate, a novel HIV-1 Tat antagonist: synthesis and anti-HIV activities,” Biochemistry, vol. 40, no. 51, pp. 15612–15623, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. Chandra, I. Demirhan, S. K. Arya, and P. Chandra, “D-penicillamine inhibits transactivation of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) LTR by transactivator protein,” FEBS Letters, vol. 236, no. 2, pp. 282–286, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  39. F. Hamy, N. Gelus, M. Zeller, J. L. Lazdins, C. Bailly, and T. Klimkait, “Blocking HIV replication by targeting Tat protein,” Chemistry and Biology, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 669–676, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. Rusnati, G. Tulipano, D. Spillmann et al., “Multiple interactions of HIV-I Tat protein with size-defined heparin oligosaccharides,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 40, pp. 28198–28205, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. C. Hsu, U. Dhingra, J. V. Earley et al., “Inhibition of type 1 human immunodeficiency virus replication by a Tat antagonist to which the virus remains sensitive after prolonged exposure in vitro,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 14, pp. 6395–6399, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  42. M. C. Hsu, A. D. Schutt, M. Holly et al., “Inhibition of HIV replication in acute and chronic infections in vitro by a Tat antagonist,” Science, vol. 254, no. 5039, pp. 1799–1802, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  43. S. T. Butera, B. D. Roberts, J. W. Critchfield et al., “Compounds that target novel cellular components involved in HIV-1 transcription,” Molecular Medicine, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 758–767, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  44. J. A. Turpin, R. W. Buckheit, D. Derse et al., “Inhibition of acute-, latent-, and chronic-phase human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) replication by a bistriazoloacridone analog that selectively inhibits HIV-1 transcription,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 487–494, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  45. M. Baba, M. Okamoto, M. Makino et al., “Potent and selective inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcription by piperazinyloxoquinoline derivatives,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1250–1255, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  46. M. Baba, M. Okamoto, M. Kawamura et al., “Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication and cytokine production by fluoroquinoline derivatives,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1097–1103, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  47. L. A. Pereira, K. Bentley, A. Peeters, M. J. Churchill, and N. J. Deacon, “A compilation of cellular transcription factor interactions with the HIV-1 LTR promoter,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 663–668, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  48. C. M. Chiang, H. Ge, Z. Wang, A. Hoffman, and G. Roeder, “Unique TATA-binding protein-containing complexes and cofactors involved in transcription by RNA polymerases II and III,” EMBO Journal, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 2749–2762, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  49. J. R. Huh, J. M. Park, M. Kim, B. A. Carlson, D. L. Hatfield, and B. J. Lee, “Recruitment of TBP or TFIIB to a promoter proximal position leads to stimulation of RNA polymerase II transcription without activator proteins both in vivo and in vitro,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 256, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. Y. H. Ping and T. M. Rana, “DSIF and NELF interact with RNA polymerase II elongation complex and HIV-1 Tat stimulates P-TEFb-mediated phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II and DSIF during transcription elongation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 16, pp. 12951–12958, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. C. B. Phelps, L. L. Sengchanthalangsy, S. Malek, and G. Ghosh, “Mechanism of κB DNA binding by Rel/NF-κB dimers,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 32, pp. 24392–24399, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. Y. Liu, M. R. Nonnemacher, and B. Wigdahl, “CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins and the pathogenesis of retrovirus infection,” Future Microbiology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 299–321, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. H. L. Ross, S. Gartner, J. C. McArthur et al., “HIV-1 LTR C/EBP binding site sequence configurations preferenstially encountered in brain lead to enhanced C/EBP factor binding and increased LTR-specific activity,” Journal of NeuroVirology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 235–249, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. S. Ranjbar, A. V. Tsytsykova, S. K. Lee et al., “NFAT5 regulates HIV-1 in primary monocytes via a highly conserved long terminal repeat site,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 2, no. 12, article e130, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. A. J. Henderson and K. L. Calame, “CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) sites are required for HIV-1 replication in primary macrophages but not CD4+ T cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 16, pp. 8714–8719, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. E. M. Kilareski, S. Shah, M. R. Nonnemacher, and B. Wigdahl, “Regulation of HIV-1 transcription in cells of the monocyte-macrophage lineage,” Retrovirology, vol. 6, article 118, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. F. C. Krebs, M. M. Goodenow, and B. Wigdahl, “Neuroglial ATF/CREB factors interact with the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat,” Journal of NeuroVirology, vol. 3, supplement 1, pp. S28–S32, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  58. S. Shah, M. R. Nonnemacher, V. Pirrone, and B. Wigdahl, “Innate and adaptive factors regulating human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genomic activation,” Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 278–293, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. B. Alberts, A. Johnson, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts, and P. Walter, Molecular Biology of the Cell, 2002.
  60. E. Verdin, P. Paras Jr., and C. van Lint, “Chromatin disruption in the promoter of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 during transcriptional activation,” EMBO Journal, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 3249–3259, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  61. E. Verdin, “DNase I-hypersensitive sites are associated with both long terminal repeats and with the intragenic enhancer of integrated human immunodeficiency virus type 1,” Journal of Virology, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 6790–6799, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  62. K. A. Jones and B. M. Peterlin, “Control of RNA initiation and elongation at the HIV-1 promoter,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 63, pp. 717–743, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  63. C. van Lint, C. A. Amella, S. Emiliani, M. John, T. Jie, and E. Verdin, “Transcription factor binding sites downstream of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcription start site are important for virus infectivity,” Journal of Virology, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 6113–6127, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  64. A. Pumfery, L. Deng, A. Maddukuri et al., “Chromatin remodeling and modification during HIV-1 Tat-activated transcription,” Current HIV Research, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 343–362, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  65. S. L. Berger, “Histone modifications in transcriptional regulation,” Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 142–148, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. M. P. Cosma, “Ordered recruitment: gene-specific mechanism of transcription activation,” Molecular Cell, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 227–236, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. S. A. Williams, L. F. Chen, H. Kwon, C. M. Ruiz-Jarabo, E. Verdin, and W. C. Greene, “NF-κB p50 promotes HIV latency through HDAC recruitment and repression of transcriptional initiation,” EMBO Journal, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 139–149, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. J. J. Coull, F. Romerio, J. M. Sun et al., “The human factors YY1 and LSF repress the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat via recruitment of histone deacetylase 1,” Journal of Virology, vol. 74, no. 15, pp. 6790–6799, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. W. Fischle, S. Emiliani, M. J. Hendzel et al., “A new family of human histone deacetylases related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae HDA1p,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 17, pp. 11713–11720, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. A. J. Bannister, P. Zegerman, J. F. Partridge et al., “Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain,” Nature, vol. 410, no. 6824, pp. 120–124, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. T. Cheutin, A. J. McNairn, T. Jenuwein, D. M. Gilbert, P. B. Singh, and T. Misteli, “Maintenance of stable heterochromatin domains by dynamic HP1 binding,” Science, vol. 299, no. 5607, pp. 721–725, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. S. I. S. Grewal and D. Moazed, “Heterochromatin and epigenetic control of gene expression,” Science, vol. 301, no. 5634, pp. 798–802, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. T. Ishida, A. Hamano, T. Koiwa, and T. Watanabe, “5' long terminal repeat (LTR)-selective methylation of latently infected HIV-1 provirus that is demethylated by reactivation signals,” Retrovirology, vol. 3, article 69, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. K. F. T. Copeland, “Modulation of HIV-1 transcription by cytokines and chemokines,” Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 1093–1101, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  75. F. C. Krebs, S. R. Miller, B. J. Catalone et al., “Comparative in vitro sensitivities of human immune cell lines, vaginal and cervical epithelial cell lines, and primary cells to candidate microbicides nonoxynol 9, C31G, and sodium dodecyl sulfate,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 2292–2298, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. K. Lassen, Y. Han, Y. Zhou, J. Siliciano, and R. F. Siliciano, “The multifactorial nature of HIV-1 latency,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 525–531, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. J. O. Liu, “The yins of T cell activation,” Science's STKE, vol. 2005, no. 265, p. re1, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  78. J. Brady and F. Kashanchi, “Tat gets the “green” light on transcription initiation,” Retrovirology, vol. 2, article 69, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. A. I. Dayton, J. G. Sodroski, and C. A. Rosen, “The trans-activator gene of the human T cell lymphotropic virus type III is required for replication,” Cell, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 941–947, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  80. A. G. Fisher, M. B. Feinberg, and S. F. Josephs, “The trans-activator gene of HTLV-III is essential for virus replication,” Nature, vol. 320, no. 6060, pp. 367–371, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  81. M. F. Laspia, A. P. Rice, and M. B. Mathews, “Synergy between HIV-1 Tat and adenovirus E1A is principally due to stabilization of transcriptional elongation,” Genes and Development, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 2397–2408, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  82. S. Ghosh, M. J. Selby, and B. M. Peterlin, “Synergism between Tat and VP16 in trans-activation of HIV-1 LTR,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 234, no. 3, pp. 610–619, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. T. P. Cujec, H. Okamoto, K. Fujinaga et al., “The HIV transactivator Tat binds to the CDK-activating kinase and activates the phosphorylation of the carboxy-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II,” Genes and Development, vol. 11, no. 20, pp. 2645–2657, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  84. L. F. García-Martínez, G. Mavankal, J. M. Neveu, W. S. Lane, D. Ivanov, and R. B. Gaynor, “Purification of a Tat-associated kinase reveals a TFIIH complex that modulates HIV-1 transcription,” EMBO Journal, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 2836–2850, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. C. A. Parada and R. G. Roeder, “Enhanced processivity of RNA polymerase II triggered by Tat-induced phosphorylation of its carboxy-terminal domain,” Nature, vol. 384, no. 6607, pp. 375–378, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. B. Berkhout, R. H. Silverman, and K. T. Jeang, “Tat trans-activates the human immunodeficiency virus through a nascent RNA target,” Cell, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 273–282, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  87. M. A. Muesing, D. H. Smith, and D. J. Capon, “Regulation of mRNA accumulation by a human immunodeficiency virus trans-activator protein,” Cell, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 691–701, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  88. T. Raha, S. W. Cheng, and M. R. Green, “HIV-1 Tat stimulates transcription complex assembly through recruitment of TBP in the absence of TAFs,” PLoS Biology, vol. 3, no. 2, article e44, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  89. M. J. Selby, E. S. Bain, P. A. Luciw, and B. M. Peterlin, “Structure, sequence, and position of the stem-loop in tar determine transcriptional elongation by Tat through the HIV-1 long terminal repeat,” Genes & Development, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 547–558, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  90. M. J. Churcher, C. Lamont, F. Hamy et al., “High affinity binding of TAR RNA by the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 Tat protein requires base-pairs in the RNA stem and amino acid residues flanking the basic region,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 230, no. 1, pp. 90–110, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. Y. Zhu, T. Pe'ery, J. Peng et al., “Transcription elongation factor P-TEFb is required for HIV-1 Tat transactivation in vitro,” Genes and Development, vol. 11, no. 20, pp. 2622–2632, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  92. P. Wei, M. E. Garber, S. M. Fang, W. H. Fischer, and K. A. Jones, “A novel CDK9-associated C-type cyclin interacts directly with HIV-1 Tat and mediates its high-affinity, loop-specific binding to TAR RNA,” Cell, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 451–462, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. Q. Zhou, D. Chen, E. Pierstorff, and K. Luo, “Transcription elongation factor P-TEFb mediates Tat activation of HIV-1 transcription at multiple stages,” EMBO Journal, vol. 17, no. 13, pp. 3681–3691, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. R. Ghose, L. Y. Liou, C. H. Herrmann, and A. P. Rice, “Induction of TAK (cyclin T1/P-TEFb) in purified resting CD4+ T lymphocytes by combination of cytokines,” Journal of Virology, vol. 75, no. 23, pp. 11336–11343, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. S. Emiliani, W. Fischle, M. Ott, C. van Lint, C. A. Amella, and E. Verdin, “Mutations in the Tat gene are responsible for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 postintegration latency in the U1 cell line,” Journal of Virology, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 1666–1670, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  96. S. Emiliani, C. van Lint, W. Fischle et al., “A point mutation in the HIV-1 Tat responsive element is associated with postintegration latency,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 13, pp. 6377–6381, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. K. Yankulov and D. Bentley, “Transcriptional control: Tat cofactors and transcriptional elongation,” Current Biology, vol. 8, no. 13, pp. R447–R449, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  98. C. Das, S. P. Edgcomb, R. Peteranderl, L. Chen, and A. D. Frankel, “Evidence for conformational flexibility in the Tat-TAR recognition motif of cyclin T1,” Virology, vol. 318, no. 1, pp. 306–317, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. R. E. Jeeninga, M. Hoogenkamp, M. Armand-Ugon, M. de Baar, K. Verhoef, and B. Berkhout, “Functional differences between the long terminal repeat transcriptional promoters of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtypes A through G,” Journal of Virology, vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 3740–3751, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. T. Kurosu, T. Mukai, W. Auwanit, P. I. N. Ayuthaya, S. Saeng-Aroon, and K. Ikuta, “Variable sequences in the long terminal repeat and its downstream region of some of HIV type 1 CRF01_AE recently distributing among Thai carriers,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 863–866, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. J. K. Carr, M. O. Salminen, C. Koch et al., “Full-length sequence and mosaic structure of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolate from Thailand,” Journal of Virology, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 5935–5943, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  102. F. Gao, D. L. Robertson, S. G. Morrison et al., “The heterosexual human immunodeficiency virus type 1 epidemic in Thailand is caused by an intersubtype (A/E) recombinant of African origin,” Journal of Virology, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 7013–7029, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  103. M. A. Montano, V. A. Novitsky, J. T. Blackard, N. L. Cho, D. A. Katzenstein, and M. Essex, “Divergent transcriptional regulation among expanding human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtypes,” Journal of Virology, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 8657–8665, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  104. E. R. de Arellano, V. Soriano, and A. Holguin, “Genetic analysis of regulatory, promoter, and TAR regions of LTR sequences belonging to HIV type 1 non-B subtypes,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 949–954, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. M. A. Montano, C. P. Nixon, and M. Essex, “Dysregulation through the NF-κB enhancer and TATA box of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype E promoter,” Journal of Virology, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 8446–8452, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  106. T. J. Scriba, T. de Villiers, F. K. Treurnicht et al., “Characterization of the South African HIV type 1 subtype C complete 5' long terminal repeat, nef, and regulatory genes,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 149–159, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. I. D'Orso and A. D. Frankel, “Tat acetylation modulates assembly of a viral-host RNA-protein transcription complex,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 9, pp. 3101–3106, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. K. Asamitsu, Y. Hibi, K. Imai et al., “Functional characterization of human cyclin T1 N-terminal region for human immunodeficiency virus-1 Tat transcriptional activation,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 410, no. 5, pp. 887–895, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. M. E. Dahmus, “Phosphorylation of the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1261, no. 2, pp. 171–182, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. J. Q. Svejstrup, Y. Li, J. Fellows, A. Gnatt, S. Bjorklund, and R. D. Kornberg, “Evidence for a mediator cycle at the initiation of transcription,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 6075–6078, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  111. I. D'Orso, J. R. Grunwell, R. L. Nakamura, C. Das, and A. D. Frankel, “Targeting Tat inhibitors in the assembly of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcription complexes,” Journal of Virology, vol. 82, no. 19, pp. 9492–9504, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. G. Marzio, M. Tyagi, M. I. Gutierrez, and M. Giacca, “HIV-1 Tat transactivator recruits p300 and CREB-binding protein histone acetyltransferases to the viral promoter,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 23, pp. 13519–13524, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. A. E. L. Kharroubi and M. A. Martin, “cis-acting sequences located downstream of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 promoter affect its chromatin structure and transcriptional activity,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 2958–2966, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  114. L. Deng, C. de la Fuente, P. Fu et al., “Acetylation of HIV-1 Tat by CBP/P300 increases transcription of integrated HIV-1 genome and enhances binding to core histones,” Virology, vol. 277, no. 2, pp. 278–295, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. M. Benkirane, R. F. Chun, H. Xiao et al., “Activation of integrated provirus requires histone acetyltransferase: p300 and P/CAF are coactivators for HIV-1 tat,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 38, pp. 24898–24905, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. V. Brès, R. Kiernan, S. Emiliani, and M. Benkirane, “Tat acetyl-acceptor lysines are important for human immunodeficiency virus type-1 replication,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 25, pp. 22215–22221, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. V. Brès, H. Tagami, J. M. Péloponèse et al., “Differential acetylation of Tat coordinates its interaction with the co-activators cyclin T1 and PCAF,” EMBO Journal, vol. 21, no. 24, pp. 6811–6819, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. C. van Lint, S. Emiliani, M. Ott, and E. Verdin, “Transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling of the HIV-1 promoter in response to histone acetylation,” EMBO Journal, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1112–1120, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  119. B. Furia, L. Deng, K. Wu et al., “Enhancement of nuclear factor-κB acetylation by coactivator p300 and HIV-1 Tat proteins,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 7, pp. 4973–4980, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. C. J. Wilson, D. M. Chao, A. N. Imbalzano, G. R. Schnitzler, R. E. Kingston, and R. A. Young, “RNA polymerase II holoenzyme contains SWI/SNF regulators involved in chromatin remodeling,” Cell, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 235–244, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. C. L. Peterson and J. W. Tamkun, “The SWI-SNF complex: a chromatin remodeling machine,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 143–146, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. C. Tréand, I. Du Chéné, V. Brès et al., “Requirement for SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex in Tat-mediated activation of the HIV-1 promoter,” EMBO Journal, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1690–1699, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. T. Mahmoudi, M. Parra, R. G. J. Vries et al., “The SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex is a cofactor for Tat transactivation of the HIV promoter,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 29, pp. 19960–19968, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. A. Henderson, A. Holloway, R. Reeves, and D. J. Tremethick, “Recruitment of SWI/SNF to the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 promoter,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 389–397, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. K. Zhao, W. Wang, O. J. Rando et al., “Rapid and phosphoinositol-dependent binding of the SWI/SNF-like BAF complex to chromatin after T lymphocyte receptor signaling,” Cell, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 625–636, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  126. X. Shen, H. Xiao, R. Ranallo, W. H. Wu, and C. Wu, “Modulation of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes by inositol polyphosphates,” Science, vol. 299, no. 5603, pp. 112–114, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. D. J. Steger, E. S. Haswell, A. L. Miller, S. R. Wente, and E. K. O'Shea, “Regulation of chromatin remodeling by inositol polyphosphates,” Science, vol. 299, no. 5603, pp. 114–116, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. K. T. Jeang, R. Chun, N. H. Lin, A. Gatignol, C. G. Glabe, and H. Fan, “In vitro and in vivo binding of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat protein and Sp1 transcription factor,” Journal of Virology, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 6224–6233, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  129. R. F. Chun, O. J. Semmes, C. Neuveut, and K. T. Jeang, “Modulation of Sp1 phosphorylation by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 tat,” Journal of Virology, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 2615–2629, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  130. D. Chen and Q. Zhou, “Tat activates human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcriptional elongation independent of TFIIH kinase,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 2863–2871, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  131. R. F. Siliciano and W. C. Greene, “HIV Latency,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, vol. 1, no. 1, atricle a007096, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  132. K. Fujinaga, R. Taube, J. Wimmer, T. P. Cujec, and B. M. Peterlin, “Interactions between human cyclin T, tat, and the transactivation response element (TAR) are disrupted by a cysteine to tyrosine substitution found in mouse cyclin T,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 1285–1290, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. C. Ambrosino, M. R. Ruocco, X. Chen et al., “HIV-1 Tat induces the expression of the interleukin-6 (IL6) gene by binding to the IL6 leader RNA and by interacting with CAAT enhancer-binding protein β (NF-IL6) transcription factors,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 23, pp. 14883–14892, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. X. Liu, M. Jana, S. Dasgupta et al., “Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Tat induces nitric-oxide synthase in human astroglia,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 42, pp. 39312–39319, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. R. Mukerjee, B. E. Sawaya, K. Khalili, and S. Amini, “Association of p65 and C/EBPβ with HIV-1 LTR modulates transcription of the viral promoter,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 1210–1216, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  136. F. Macián and A. Rao, “Reciprocal modulatory interaction between human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat and transcription factor NFAT1,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 3645–3653, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  137. N. Kim, S. Kukkonen, S. Gupta, and A. Aldovini, “Association of Tat with promoters of PTEN and PP2A subunits is key to transcriptional activation of apoptotic pathways in HIV-infected CD4+ T cells,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 6, no. 9, article e01103, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. B. N. Fields et al., Fields' Virology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 4th edition, 2001.
  139. T. Zhu, H. Mo, N. Wang et al., “Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of HIV-1 in patients with primary infection,” Science, vol. 261, no. 5125, pp. 1179–1181, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  140. S. Opi, J. M. Péloponèse, D. Esquieu et al., “Tat HIV-1 primary and tertiary structures critical to immune response against non-homologous variants,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 39, pp. 35915–35919, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  141. G. van Marle and C. Power, “Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genetic diversity in the nervous system: evolutionary epiphenomenon or disease determinant?” Journal of NeuroVirology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 107–128, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  142. N. B. Siddappa, M. Venkatramanan, P. Venkatesh et al., “Transactivation and signaling functions of Tat are not correlated: biological and immunological characterization of HIV-1 subtype-C Tat protein,” Retrovirology, vol. 3, article 53, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  143. G. Turk, M. Carobene, A. Monczor, A. E. Rubio, M. Gómez-Carrillo, and H. Salomón, “Higher transactivation activity associated with LTR and Tat elements from HIV-I BF intersubtype recombinant variants,” Retrovirology, vol. 3, article 14, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  144. T. Kurosu, T. Mukai, S. Komoto et al., “Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C exhibits higher transactivation activity of Tat than subtypes B and E,” Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 787–799, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  145. G. R. Campbell, J. D. Watkins, K. K. Singh, E. P. Loret, and S. A. Spector, “Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C Tat fails to induce intracellular calcium flux and induces reduced tumor necrosis factor production from monocytes,” Journal of Virology, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 5919–5928, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  146. U. Ranga, R. Shankarappa, N. B. Siddappa et al., “Tat protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C strains is a defective chemokine,” Journal of Virology, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 2586–2590, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  147. U. Neogi, S. Gupta, P. N. Sahoo et al., “Genetic characterization of 5 HIV-1 Tat exon 1 from a southern Indian clinical cohort: identification of unique epidemiological signature residues,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses. In press. View at: Google Scholar
  148. L. Li, B. Aiamkitsumrit, V. Pirrone et al., “Development of co-selected single nucleotide polymorphisms in the viral promoter precedes the onset of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-associated neurocognitive impairment,” Journal of NeuroVirology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 92–109, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  149. S. Spira, M. A. Wainberg, H. Loemba, D. Turner, and B. G. Brenner, “Impact of clade diversity on HIV-1 virulence, antiretroviral drug sensitivity and drug resistance,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 229–240, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  150. F. Gao, D. L. Robertson, C. D. Carruthers et al., “A comprehensive panel of near-full-length clones and reference sequences for non-subtype B isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1,” Journal of Virology, vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 5680–5698, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  151. S. S. Dey, Y. Xue, M. P. Joachimiak et al., “Mutual information analysis reveals coevolving residues in Tat that compensate for two distinct functions in HIV-1 gene expression,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 11, pp. 7945–7955, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  152. M. C. D. G. Huigen, W. Kamp, and H. S. L. M. Nottet, “Multiple effects of HIV-1 trans-activator protein on the pathogenesis of HIV-1 infection,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 57–66, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  153. A. Banerjee, M. Strazza, and B. Wigdahl, “Role of mu-opioids as cofactors in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 disease progression and neuropathogenesis,” Neurovirology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 291–302, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  154. I. L. Tan and J. C. McArthur, “HIV-associated neurological disorders: a guide to pharmacotherapy,” CNS Drugs, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 123–134, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  155. N. Z. Mothobi and B. J. Brew, “Neurocognitive dysfunction in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 4–9, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  156. C. Power, M. J. Gill, and R. T. Johnson, “Progress in clinical neurosciences: the neuropathogenesis of HIV infection: Host-virus interaction and the impact of therapy,” Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 19–32, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  157. S. L. Letendre, R. J. Ellis, B. M. Ances, and J. A. McCutchan, “Neurologic complications of HIV disease and their treatment,” Topics in HIV Medicine, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 45–55, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  158. L. Boven, F. Noorbakhsh, G. Bouma et al., “Brain-derived human immunodeficiency virus-1 Tat exerts differential effects on LTR transactivation and neuroimmune activation,” Journal of NeuroVirology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 173–184, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  159. K. Wong, A. Sharma, S. Awasthi et al., “HIV-1 Tat interactions with p300 and PCAF transcriptional coactivators inhibit histone acetylation and neurotrophin signaling through CREB,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 10, pp. 9390–9399, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  160. K. Conant, A. Garzino-Demo, A. Nath et al., “Induction of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in HIV-1 Tat-stimulated astrocytes and elevation in AIDS dementia,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 3117–3121, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  161. M. V. Aksenova, J. M. Silvers, M. Y. Aksenov et al., “HIV-1 Tat neurotoxicity in primary cultures of rat midbrain fetal neurons: changes in dopamine transporter binding and immunoreactivity,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 395, no. 3, pp. 235–239, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  162. L. Buscemi, D. Ramonet, and J. D. Geiger, “Human immunodeficiency virus type-1 protein Tat induces tumor necrosis factor-α-mediated neurotoxicity,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 661–670, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  163. O. Kutsch, J. W. Oh, A. Nath, and E. N. Benveniste, “Induction of the chemokines interleukin-8 and IP-10 by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat in astrocytes,” Journal of Virology, vol. 74, no. 19, pp. 9214–9221, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  164. R. Williams, H. Yao, N. K. Dhillon, and S. J. Buch, “HIV-1 Tat co-operates with IFN-γ and TNF-α to increase CXCL10 in human astrocytes,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 5, article e5709, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  165. A. C. Bratanich, C. Liu, J. C. McArthur et al., “Brain-derived HIV-1 Tat sequences from AIDS patients with dementia show increased molecular heterogeneity,” Journal of NeuroVirology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 387–393, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  166. M. Mayne, A. C. Bratanich, P. Chen, F. Rana, A. Nath, and C. Power, “HIV-1 Tat molecular diversity and induction of TNF-α: implications for HIV-induced neurological disease,” NeuroImmunoModulation, vol. 5, no. 3-4, pp. 184–192, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  167. D. Cowley, L. R. Gray, S. L. Wesselingh, P. R. Gorry, and M. J. Churchill, “Genetic and functional heterogeneity of CNS-derived Tat alleles from patients with HIV-associated dementia,” Journal of NeuroVirology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 70–81, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  168. T. H. Hogan, D. L. Stauff, F. C. Krebs, S. Gartner, S. J. Quiterio, and B. Wigdahl, “Structural and functional evolution of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat CCAAT/enhancer binding protein sites and their use as molecular markers for central nervous system disease progression,” Journal of NeuroVirology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 55–68, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  169. H. L. Ross, M. R. Nonnemacher, T. H. Hogan et al., “Interaction between CCAAT/enhancer binding protein and cyclic amp response element binding protein 1 regulates human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcription in cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage,” Journal of Virology, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 1842–1856, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  170. M. R. Nonnemacher, B. P. Irish, Y. Liu, D. Mauger, and B. Wigdahl, “Specific sequence configurations of HIV-1 LTR G/C box array result in altered recruitment of Sp isoforms and correlate with disease progression,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 157, no. 1-2, pp. 39–47, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  171. L. Li, B. Aiamkitsumrit, V. Pirrone et al., “Development of co-selected single nucleotide polymorphisms in the viral promoter precedes the onset of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-associated neurocognitive impairment,” Journal of NeuroVirology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 92–109, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  172. J. B. Johnston, K. Zhang, C. Silva et al., “HIV-1 Tat neurotoxicity is prevented by matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 230–241, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  173. C. Silva, K. Zhang, S. Tsutsui, J. K. Holden, M. J. Gill, and C. Power, “Growth hormone prevents human immunodeficiency virus-induced neuronal p53 expression,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 605–614, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  174. T. H. Burdo, S. Gartner, D. Mauger, and B. Wigdahl, “Region-specific distribution of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeats containing specific configurations of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein site II in brains derived from demented and nondemented patients,” Journal of NeuroVirology, vol. 10, supplement 1, pp. 7–14, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  175. T. H. Hogan, M. R. Nonnemacher, F. C. Krebs, A. Henderson, and B. Wigdahl, “HIV-1 Vpr binding to HIV-1 LTR C/EBP cis-acting elements and adjacent regions is sequence-specific,” Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  176. S. N. Richter and G. Palù, “Inhibitors of HIV-1 Tat-mediated transactivation,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1305–1315, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  177. H. Siomi, H. Shida, M. Maki, and M. Hatanaka, “Effects of a highly basic region of human immunodeficiency virus Tat protein on nucleolar localization,” Journal of Virology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1803–1807, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  178. I. Choudhury, J. Wang, S. Stein, A. Rabson, and M. J. Leibowitz, “Translational effects of peptide antagonists of Tat protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 80, part 3, pp. 777–782, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  179. V. Cecchetti, C. Parolin, S. Moro et al., “6-aminoquinolones as new potential anti-HIV agents,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 43, no. 20, pp. 3799–3802, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  180. S. Richter, C. Parolin, B. Gatto et al., “Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat-trans-activation-responsive region interaction by an antiviral quinolone derivative,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1895–1899, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  181. H. Y. Mei, M. Cui, A. Heldsinger et al., “Inhibitors of protein-RNA complexation that target the RNA: specific recognition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 TAR RNA by small organic molecules,” Biochemistry, vol. 37, no. 40, pp. 14204–14212, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  182. M. Stevens, C. Pannecouque, E. de Clercq, and J. Balzarini, “Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus by a new class of pyridine oxide derivatives,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 2951–2957, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  183. M. Stevens, C. Pannecouque, E. de Clercq, and J. Balzarini, “Novel human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) inhibitors that have a dual mode of anti-HIV action,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 3109–3116, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  184. E. de Clercq and D. Schols, “Inhibition of HIV infection by CXCR4 and CCR5 chemokine receptor antagonists,” Antiviral Chemistry and Chemotherapy, vol. 12, supplement 1, pp. 19–31, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  185. N. Gelus, F. Hamy, and C. Bailly, “Molecular basis of HIV-1 TAR RNA specific recognition by an acridine Tat-antagonist,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1075–1079, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  186. S. Wang, P. W. Huber, M. Cui, A. W. Czarnik, and H. Y. Mei, “Binding of neomycin to the TAR element of HIV-1 RNA induces dissociation of Tat protein by an allosteric mechanism,” Biochemistry, vol. 37, no. 16, pp. 5549–5557, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  187. K. Hamasaki and A. Ueno, “Aminoglycoside antibiotics, neamine and its derivatives as potent inhibitors for the RNA-protein interactions derived from HIV-1 activators,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 591–594, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  188. J. M. Jacque, K. Triques, and M. Stevenson, “Modulation of HIV-1 replication by RNA interference,” Nature, vol. 418, no. 6896, pp. 435–438, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  189. P. Corbeau, “Interfering RNA and HIV: reciprocal interferences,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 4, no. 9, article e1000162, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  190. A. J. Fulcher and D. A. Jans, “The HIV-1 Tat transactivator protein: a therapeutic target?” IUBMB Life, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 669–680, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  191. M. Giacca, “The HIV-1 Tat protein: a multifaceted target for novel therapeutic opportunities,” Current Drug Targets, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 277–285, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  192. V. Pirrone, B. Wigdahl, and F. C. Krebs, “The rise and fall of polyanionic inhibitors of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1,” Antiviral Research, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 168–182, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  193. M. Rusnati, G. Taraboletti, C. Urbinati et al., “Thrombospondin-1/HIV-1 Tat protein interaction: modulation of the biological activity of extracellular Tat,” FASEB Journal, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 1917–1930, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  194. A. Corallini, M. Betti, M. Rusnati et al., “Characterization of the effects of two polysulfonated distamycin A derivatives, PNU145156E and PNU153429, on HIV type 1 Tat protein,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 14, no. 17, pp. 1561–1571, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  195. K. Watson, N. J. Gooderham, D. S. Davies, and R. J. Edwards, “Interaction of the transactivating protein HIV-1 Tat with sulphated polysaccharides,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 775–783, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  196. H. Zhao, J. Li, and L. Jiang, “Inhibition of HIV-1 TAR RNA-Tat peptide complexation using poly(acrylic acid),” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 320, no. 1, pp. 95–99, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  197. L. W. Meredith, H. Sivakumaran, L. Major, A. Suhrbier, and D. Harrich, “Potent inhibition of HIV-1 replication by a Tat mutant,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 11, article e7769, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  198. C. Ulich, D. Harrich, P. Estes, and R. B. Gaynor, “Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication is enhanced by a combination of transdominant Tat and Rev proteins,” Journal of Virology, vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 4871–4876, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  199. C. Rossi, P. G. Balboni, M. Betti et al., “Inhibition of HIV-1 replication by a Tat transdominant negative mutant in human peripheral blood lymphocytes from healthy donors and HIV-1-infected patients,” Gene Therapy, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1261–1269, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  200. A. Caputo, M. P. Grossi, R. Bozzini et al., “Inhibition of HIV-1 replication and reactivation from latency by Tat transdominant negative mutants in the cysteine rich region,” Gene Therapy, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 235–245, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  201. G. Goldstein and J. J. Chicca II, “A universal anti-HIV-1 Tat epitope vaccine that is fully synthetic and self-adjuvanting,” Vaccine, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1008–1014, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  202. W. Huang, G. Varani, and G. P. Drobny, “13C/15N-19F intermolecular REDOR NMR study of the interaction of TAR RNA with Tat peptides,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 132, no. 50, pp. 17643–17645, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  203. A. Davidson, K. Patora-Komisarska, J. A. Robinson, and G. Varani, “Essential structural requirements for specific recognition of HIV TAR RNA by peptide mimetics of Tat protein,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 248–256, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  204. V. Pirrone, N. Thakkar, J. M. Jacobson, B. Wigdahl, and F. C. Krebs, “Combinatorial approaches to the prevention and treatment of HIV-1 infection,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1831–1842, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  205. S. Biglione, S. A. Byers, J. P. Price et al., “Inhibition of HIV-1 replication by P-TEFb inhibitors DRB, seliciclib and flavopiridol correlates with release of free P-TEFb from the large, inactive form of the complex,” Retrovirology, vol. 4, article 47, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  206. J. Bai, J. Sui, R. Y. Zhu et al., “Inhibition of Tat-mediated transactivation and HIV-1 replication by human anti-hCyclinT1 intrabodies,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 3, pp. 1433–1442, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  207. K. Fujinaga, D. Irwin, M. Geyer, and B. M. Peterlin, “Optimized chimeras between kinase-inactive mutant Cdk9 and truncated cyclin T1 proteins efficiently inhibit Tat transactivation and human immunodeficiency virus gene expression,” Journal of Virology, vol. 76, no. 21, pp. 10873–10881, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  208. J. H. N. Yik, R. Chen, R. Nishimura, J. L. Jennings, A. J. Link, and Q. Zhou, “Inhibition of P-TEFb (CDK9/cyclin T) kinase and RNA polymerase II transcription by the coordinated actions of HEXIM1 and 7SK snRNA,” Molecular Cell, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 971–982, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  209. J. H. N. Yik, R. Chen, A. C. Pezda, C. S. Samford, and Q. Zhou, “A human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat-like arginine-rich RNA-binding domain is essential for HEXIM1 to inhibit RNA polymerase II transcription through 7SK snRNA-mediated inactivation of P-TEFb,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 5094–5105, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  210. A. Dorr, V. Kiermer, A. Pedal et al., “Transcriptional synergy between Tat and PCAF is dependent on the binding of acetylated Tat to the PCAF bromodomain,” EMBO Journal, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 2715–2723, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  211. T. Ammosova, R. Berro, M. Jerebtsova et al., “Phosphorylation of HIV-1 Tat by CDK2 in HIV-1 transcription,” Retrovirology, vol. 3, article 78, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  212. C. Chiao, T. Bader, J. E. Stenger, W. Baldwin, J. Brady, and J. C. Barrett, “HIV type 1 Tat inhibits tumor necrosis factor α-induced repression of tumor necrosis factor receptor p55 and amplifies tumor necrosis factor α activity in stably Tat-transfected HeLa cells,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1125–1132, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  213. M. A. Munoz-Fernandez, J. Navarro, E. Obregon et al., “Immunological and virological markers of disease progression in HIV- infected children,” Acta Paediatrica, vol. 421, pp. 46–51, 1997. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Luna Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

2766 Views | 1050 Downloads | 18 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.