Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Virology
Volume 2017, Article ID 6807964, 16 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6807964
Review Article

Global Status of Porcine circovirus Type 2 and Its Associated Diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa

1SAMRC Microbial Water Quality Monitoring Centre, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, Eastern Cape, South Africa
2Applied and Environmental Microbiology Research Group (AEMREG), Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, Eastern Cape, South Africa
3Academic and Research Division, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice, Eastern Cape, South Africa

Correspondence should be addressed to Kayode O. Afolabi; moc.liamg@ibalofaakniyaloedoyak

Received 16 November 2016; Revised 13 February 2017; Accepted 23 February 2017; Published 12 March 2017

Academic Editor: Trudy Morrison

Copyright © 2017 Kayode O. Afolabi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Globally, Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) is a recognized viral pathogen of great economic value in pig farming. It is the major cause of ravaging postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) and many other disease syndromes generally regarded as Porcine circovirus associated diseases (PCVAD) in Europe. PCV2 infections, specifically PMWS, had impacted huge economic loss on swine production at different regions of the world. It has been studied and reported at different parts of the globe including: North and South America, Europe, Asia, Oceania, Middle East, and the Caribbean. However, till date, this virus and its associated diseases have been grossly understudied in sub-Sahara African region and the entire continent at large. Two out of forty-nine, representing just about 4% of countries that make up sub-Sahara Africa presently, have limited records on reported cases and occurrence of the viral pathogen despite the ubiquitous nature of the virus. This review presents an overview of the discovery of Porcine circovirus and its associated diseases in global pig herds and emphasizes the latest trends in PCV2 vaccines and antiviral drugs development and the information gaps that exist on the occurrence of this important viral pathogen in swine herds of sub-Saharan Africa countries. This will serve as wake-up call for immediate and relevant actions by stakeholders in the region.

1. Introduction

Pig rearing is one of the fastest growing livestock sector worldwide [1] as it is a valuable source of animal protein globally and the industry contributes largely to the economy of many countries [2]. Despite the huge economic potentials of piggery business, many farms are faced with myriads of problems orchestrated by diseases that have the capacity to decimate herds. In as much as many opportunities abound in pig rearing especially for small scale farmers, their efforts to improve on their production capacity are hampered by great loss of animals to diseases [3]. Furthermore, the problem becomes more complicated by limited information on the relative frequency of occurrence of the different diseases and their detrimental effects on pig production, most especially in developing countries of Africa [4]. Swine diseases of economic importance range between bacterial, viral, fungal, and protozoan origins. According to Vidigal et al. [5], swine infectious pathogens have greatly caught the attention of researchers from early 1990s when a lot of pig-producing countries experienced very huge economic losses as a result of emerging viral disease-causing agents such as Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2).

PCV2 has been known as a u niversal viral pathogen because of its presence in most, if not all the swine herds [6]. Its global prevalence and status have brought about its seropositivity rate of 20–80% in pigs coupled with very high incidence rate of 60% that is accompanied by general mortality rate of 3–10% and culling rate of 40% in seriously affected pig farms [7]. PCV2 is the main etiologic entity implicated in postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) with other remaining Porcine circovirus associated diseases (PCVADs) [8]. It has also been established to be a necessary agent in the pathogenesis of PCVADs, but not a sufficient cause of the diseases that are known to be of great economic importance in pigs production worldwide [9, 10].

2. Historical Background, Classification, and Genomic Organization of Porcine circovirus

2.1. Overview of Initial Discovery and Subsequent Retrospective Studies of Porcine circovirus in Global Swine Herds

The initial discovery of Porcine circovirus (PCV) in Germany occurred in a continuous pig kidney cell line (PK-15 ATCC-CCL31) as a picornavirus-like contaminant and without any cytopathic effect, with initial assumption of having an RNA genome [11]. However, subsequent observations led to its description as a minute, nonenveloped, and icosahedral shaped virus possessing a genome with circular single-stranded DNA [12]. Experimentally, the PCV obtained from the PK-15 cell line did not produce any ailment in pigs [13, 14]. Subsequently in 1991 at Saskatchewan, Canada, another PCV emerged in a sporadic disease called PMWS which was characterized by weight loss, breathing discomfort, jaundice, and peculiar microscopic lesions in lymphoid tissues of infected pigs [15, 16].

Ellis [17] expressed the initial bias view of some investigators with “hope” of discovering a novel porcine lentivirus from the diseased pigs since they presented an AIDS-like syndrome. They hypothesized that a lentivirus caused the immunosuppression and allowed an observable, disease-causing proliferation of an endemically infectious agent proposed to be “new” circovirus [18]. However, the disease condition was further investigated by its first discoverers: Dr. John Harding, a swine consultant veterinarian in a private practice, and Dr. Edward Clark, a veterinary pathologist at University of Saskatchewan, Canada. Subsequently, a new DNA-virus with similar morphology to the PK-15 originated PCV was discovered from PMWS-affected pigs not only in North America but also in European countries [1921] and has virtually been described in all continents of the world. Further examination of PMWS-associated PCV showed notable variations when compared with initially defined PCV [22, 23], and in a bid to differentiate the nonpathogenic PCV from pathogenic PMWS-associated PCV, the nonpathogenic strain was called Porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV1), while the latter was named Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) [24].

Through PCV2 serological studies, it was observed that PCV2 infection is present globally, whereas the prevalence of its associated diseases is much lower; hence, the commonest form of PCV2 manifestation is the subclinical infection [25, 26]. However through various retrospective studies, the pathogenic PCV2 was observed to be in existence in swine herds from different regions of the world earlier before the PMWS outbreak in 1998 [27]. Jacobsen et al. [28] attempted to unravel the origin, spread, and pathogenesis of PCV2 and its diseases in northern Germany confirmed that the existence of PCV2 in pigs dated back to 1962 based on archived samples taken for necropsy within the period of 1961 and 1998 with the use of in situ hybridization techniques and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Furthermore, it was discovered that the relative incidence of detectable viral nucleic acid and existence of PCV2-related lesions was significantly different by the subsequent years.

Total incidence of PCV2 infection was actually minimal within the period of 1961 to 1984, ranging from 0 to 11.7% but increased between 1985 and 1998 within the range of 14.3–53.3%. Also, PCV2-associated diseases were first seen in 1985 archived samples, while sequence analyses of some selected PCV2 DNA segments also showed high homology with currently existing PCV2 strains [28]. This retrospective study by Jacobsen et al. [28] is the foremost report on the detection of PCV2 in pigs worldwide. Many other retrospective studies had also confirmed the existence of the virus in swine from different countries prior to its official detection in 1998 (Table 1). However, associated diseases like PMWS and porcine dermatitis and nephritis syndrome (PDNS) were not diagnosed in the archived samples prior to 1985, implying that PCV2 infection solely is insufficient to bring about the onset of PCV2-associated diseases.

Table 1: Retrospective studies on earlier occurrence of PCV2 in pigs from some countries of the world.

The overall epidemiological data so far thus shows PCV2 to have probably been in existence in the swine population across the universe for more than five decades [2729].

2.2. Classification of Circoviruses

Historically, family Circoviridae comprises two genera, namely, Gyrovirus and Circovirus based on their morphology and genomic organization [30, 31], as established in the last published (ninth) report of International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) of the year 2009 [32] with 11 species in the genus Circovirus which include Canary circovirus, Pigeon circovirus, Duck circovirus, Finch circovirus, Goose circovirus, Beak and feather disease virus, Gull circovirus, Starling circovirus, Swan circovirus, Porcine circovirus type 1, and Porcine circovirus type 2. Genus Gyrovirus consists of only Chicken anaemia virus, with different genome organizations compared to that of Circovirus. Due to the genomic organization and replication strategy of viruses listed in the genus Circovirus, they are known to have close relationship to the plant viruses called nanoviruses and geminiviruses, with characteristic stem loop structure situated at their origin of replication and the similarity of their replication proteins [33]. It had been asserted that circoviruses are the possible genetic intermediates between nanoviruses and geminiviruses [34].

However in a latest development, the taxonomy of Circoviridae has been revisited due to the discovery of new viruses and reevaluation of genomic features that characterize members of the family. In a current ratification by ICTV (2016), genus Gyrovirus has been reassigned to the family Anelloviridae while genus Circovirus and a new genus, Cyclovirus, were grouped together in family Circoviridae, consisting of twenty-seven (27) and forty-three (43) species, respectively [41]. Cycloviruses were discovered in 2010 as a group of viruses with very high relatedness to circoviruses, having genomic features that are closely related to them, and were tentatively named cycloviruses to differentiate them from the circoviruses [42, 43]. The establishment of the two groups in family Circoviridae becomes justifiable due to phylogenetic and genomic differences that exist between them vis-à-vis the host range differences [41].

2.3. Genomic Organization of Porcine circovirus

Presently, PCVs are the smallest viruses found in animals. The diameter of their virions ranges from 17 to 21 nanometres in size [12]. Their genomes consist of single-stranded DNA that is circular in nature with about 1759 (PCV1) and 1767-1768 (PCV2) nucleotides sequence [12, 44]. PCV1 has only one genome map (Figure 1), which consists of two main open reading frames (ORFs) coding for replication initiating proteins and the structural capsid protein. The locations of the promoters of the genes (Prep and Pcap) have been determined. The capsid gene promoter is situated within the rep open reading frame (ORF1) precisely nucleotide position 1328 to 1252, while the replicase gene promoter is located at the intergenic area towards upstream of the replicase gene at nucleotide position 640 to 796 and forms a kind of overlapping at the origin of replication of PCV1 [45].

Figure 1: Genome organization of Porcine circovirus (NB: map (a) is for PCV1, while maps (b), (c), and (d) are for PCV2a and 2e; PCV2b and PCV2c and 2d, resp.), adapted from Zhai et al. [46].

PCV2 genome organization is of three types: Maps 1 to 3 (Figure 1), corresponding to PCV2a and PCV2e; PCV2b; and PCV2c and PCV2d genotypes, respectively [46]. It also possesses three main ORFs: ORF1 (945 nucleotides at positions 51 to 995) which codes for replication proteins that controls replication process of the virus [47]; ORF-2 (702 or 705 nucleotides at positions 1734/1735 to 1030/1033/1034) which codes for the immunogenic structural protein (Cap) that determines the virus antigenicity [48]; and ORF3 (315 nucleotides at positions 671 to 357) which was reported to encode PCV2 protein that causes apoptosis in vitro and also involved in the pathogenicity of the virus in mice during an in vivo study [49, 50]. Furthermore, through a latest study by [51], a novel insight that gives deeper understanding of the biological function of PCV2 ORF3 was obtained when a nuclear export sequence (NES) was localized at the N-terminus of ORF3 that codes for protein which plays critical role in nuclear export activity. In another relatively recent study, a newly discovered viral protein from ORF4 (with 180 nucleotides on positions 386 to 565) was reported. The open reading frame is not really essential for PCV2 replication; however, according to He et al. [52], it has a function of bringing down caspase activity and also helps in CD4 (+) and CD8 (+) T-lymphocytes’ regulation at the time of PCV2 infection.

3. Porcine circovirus Type 2 (PCV2)

3.1. Genotypic Classification of Porcine circovirus Type 2

According to Ojok et al. [53], no virulence specific DNA polymorphism has been recognized in PCV2; however, characterization of the virus is important for epidemiological purposes. Based on phylogenetic studies and polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), a prototype for classifying PCV2 was given that earlier divided the strains of the virus into five genogroups, namely, PCV2a to 2e [54]. However, through phylogenetic analysis that was based on cap gene and complete genome of PCV2 (Figure 2), the virus has been classified into four different genotypes which are PCV2a with five clusters, PCV2b with three clusters, PCV2c, and PCV2d [5557]. PCV2a and 2b are known to have worldwide distribution, with PCV2b being the predominant genotype detected since 2003. The third type, PCV2c, was first reported in Denmark from an archived material [58] and, recently, it was discovered from live feral pigs in Brazil [59] and also from various field samples obtained from sick pigs in China [60]. The fourth genotype, PCV2d, was reported from China [56]; more recently it has been found dominating in most cases of PCV2 infections in the United State [61], South Korean pig population [62], and globally [63].

Figure 2: Four main genotypes of PCV2 as shown by phylogenetic tree that was constructed based on neighbor-joining method for complete genomes of some PCV2 sequences obtained from NCBI Genbank; genotypes of the virus were written on the main branches of the tree and PCV1 was used as outgroup (NB: the tree was constructed using Geneious 9.1.5, Biomatters Ltd. Boostrap values obtained from 1000 replicates are shown at the major nodes).

Based on latest argument of Chae [64], the classification of PCV2d is not in agreement with the standardized nomenclature rules for new PCV2 genogroups as stipulated by the European Union consortium on PCV-AD [57]. Classification of novel PCV2 genotypes is expected to fulfill two main requirements which are (a) having cut-off value on pairwise sequence comparisons (PASC) analysis of ≥0.0351 and (b) p-distance cut-off value of ≥0.035 [57, 65]. The p-distance that was obtained between PCV2b and PCV2d was 0.057 while the PASC value was just 0.020; hence, PCV2d according to Chae [64] does not meet up with the criteria by which it should be classified as a different genotype. As a result of this, it was proposed that PCV2d should be renamed as mutant Porcine circovirus type 2b (mPCV2b) on the account of the naming system laid down by the European Union consortium which serves to prevent any possible scientific confusion as regarding the PCV2 genotype names [64]. However, based on the p-distance value of between PCV2d and PCV2b that is greater than the earlier stated PCV2 genotype definition cut-off of 0.035, Xiao et al. [63] in a similar investigation, supported classification of PCV2d as an independent genotype without putting PASC cut-off value into consideration.

3.2. PCV2 Genotypes and Their Pathogenicity

It has been confirmed that both PCV2a and PCV2b are causing swine diseases with different levels of severity [66, 67], whereas PCV2c was discovered in Denmark from healthy pigs [58]. Earlier on before 2003, both PCV2a and 2b were usually prevalent in Europe and China, while in Canada and the United States, only PCV2a was common [68]. However, an observable spontaneous shift in the prevalence of PCV2a compared to PCV2b in commercial swine populations has occurred globally since 2003 with simultaneous increment in the severity of clinical PCVAD according to many available research findings [6972]. Irrespective of the notable shift, however, there has not been any remarkable difference in pathogenicity observed between PCV2a and 2b experimentally [73] as their study using conventional specific-pathogen-free (SPF) pig model observed no appreciable difference in the virulence of the two viruses in pigs that were experimentally infected with them.

Also in a similar study conducted by Lager et al. [74] using germ-free experimental pigs that were infected with PCV2a or PCV2b infectious clone, it was reported that the pathological manifestations and viral antigen load observed in the two treatments were not really different, even though the pigs that were infected with PCV2b had quicker onset of diseases and higher overall morbidity/mortality of 100% than those infected with PCV2a which was just 25%. Similarly, in a meta-analysis experiment which focused on determining the contributory factors that culminate in development of PMWS experimentally, it was observed that inoculating the pigs with PCV2b among four other factors favoured more successful reproduction of PMWS in the pigs [75]. However, the fact remains that the disease had been successfully induced in healthy pigs using either PCV2a or 2b, though, there is possibility for the observable difference in virulence between the two main genogroups, to be a function of one among several other potential factors that influence the development of the PCVADs [70].

Notwithstanding several arguments and counterarguments on virulence potentials between the two major genotypes, series of findings have shown that there is no similarity in the antigenic composition of the two genotypes [76, 77]. Sequences disparities that exist between them are usually seen at the viral structural capsid gene as well as a specific signature sequence motif that differentiates the two were observed in the genomes of the two major genotypes of the virus [78, 79]. Furthermore, reported isolation of more virulent recombinant PCV2b strains (mPCV2b) from cases of vaccine failure from countries like China [56, 80] and United States of America [81, 82] and recently from Republic of South Korea [83], Brazil [84], Uruguay [85], and Germany [86] has become a serious cause for concern due to the corresponding increase in virulence and very fast spread. Series of latest findings on the escalation of genetic differences in PCV2 according to Constans et al. [69] and subsequently confirmed by Reiner et al. [87] suggests that current vaccines that are based on PCV2a may be the driving force behind the viral selection and evolution with resultant emergence of more virulent PCV2b strains as reported in cases from fields.

3.3. Pathology, Concurrent Infections with Other Pathogens, and Transmission Modes of PCV2 and Its Associated Diseases
3.3.1. Clinical Pathology of PCV2 and Its Associated Diseases

PCV2 and its associated diseases primarily affect pigs in their late nursery stage and growers, ranging between 7 and 16 weeks old due to presumed protective influence of maternal antibody in younger piglets [88]. Clinicopathological manifestations of PCV2 infection are wasting (i.e., loss of weight), unthriftiness, skin paleness, jaundice, enlarged lymph nodes, and diarrhoea [25, 89, 90]. PCV2 majorly has predilection for the immune system of pigs by preferentially targeting the lymphoid tissues, leading to its depletion and histiocytic replacement in them which are the observable typical histological lesions [26, 91]. Pathological conditions could be exacerbated by immunostimulation or coinfections with other pathogens which occur as a result of immunosuppression and immunity reduction in the affected pigs [7, 90].

According to Segalés [26], the PCV2 infection’s clinical scope and pathology have greatly increased over the years. Apart from the most popular and ravaging PMWS, other disease conditions and disorders which include reproductive failures which is usually characterized by abortions or stillbirths with foetuses having an observable necrotizing myocarditis have been observed in the field cases of PCV2 infection and have been reproduced experimentally [92, 93]. Moreover, a respiratory disease which is termed porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC) which is known with respiratory distress has also been discovered in pigs infected with PCV2, with observable bronchiolitis with mononuclear infiltration of the lungs and interstitial pneumonia [94, 95]. The pathogen has equally been observed to be in connection with PDNS which is a disease that causes formation of skin lesions of red to purple colour in affected pigs. It is also characterized by glomerular and interstitial nephritis and vasculitis [96, 97], although it has not been experimentally reproduced in pigs infected by PCV2 [90]. The list also includes enteritis and proliferative and necrotizing pneumonia (PNP) [25, 98]. Another disease condition in which PCV2 was initially implicated is congenital tremor type A2 [99], which some subsequent research findings later exonerated from being the culprit etiologic agent [100, 101]. Nevertheless, in a latest research work, PCV2 antigen was again found in the brain tissue of newly born piglets having congenital tremor [102].

3.3.2. Multifactorial Status of PCVADs

Though PCV2 had been confirmed to be the primary pathogen implicated in PCVAD, under experimental conditions, it has been established that infection with PCV2 solely in most cases does not cause overt clinical disease. Based on available information, it has been shown that several infectious cofactors and noninfectious conditions such as concurrent infection with other pathogens [103, 104], host genetic make-up [105], and management practices [106] are crucial for disease progression to PCVAD. Consequently, infections with PCV2 have been regarded as multifactorial at the instances of other underlying cofactors that exacerbate infection with the viral pathogens resulting in the clinical disease manifestations. Infectious cofactors that have been extensively studied till date consist of Porcine parvovirus, PPV [107109], Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, PRRS [110], Swine influenza virus SIV [111], Torque teno virus [71], Swine hepatitis E virus, HEV [112], M. hyopneumoniae [111, 113], Salmonella spp. [114], E. coli [115], and Metastrongylus elongatus [116]. The noninfectious cofactors include the genetic background of the pig, high stocking density, and prevailing environmental conditions such as temperature fluctuation within the pen [106].

3.3.3. Transmission Modes of PCV2 Infection

PCV2 is a pathogen with multidimensional spreading potentials. The rate at which the viral pathogen spreads brought about the analogy: “spreading like a wildfire” according to Meng [117] in a Guest Editorial Review. The spread of PCV2 can be viewed within the scope of international transmission through trading of pigs and pig products and also transmission among local herds. PCV2 has been confirmed to be transmitted through trading of live pigs with subclinical infection due to the subtle nature of the disease, which invariably calls for a more critical diagnostic check on imported animals or their products [5, 118]. There have been reported cases of transmission through selection of boars for breeding purposes and the importation of semen for the purpose of artificial insemination [119121].

Spreading of PCV2 among local herds has been reported in various dimensions ranging from pig to pig [122, 123], man to pig [124], rodents to pig [125], insects to pig [126, 127], and pen environment to pig [128]. This becomes possible due to numerous routes of shedding the virus in cases of systemic infections, as observed in both natural and experimental conditions including oronasal secretions, faeces, urine, colostrum, milk, and semen from infected boar as earlier mentioned [129132].

3.4. Diagnosis, Prevention, Control, and Treatment of PCV2 and Its Associated Diseases
3.4.1. General Diagnosis of PCV2

As a complex disease of diverse clinical signs, accurate diagnosis of PCV2 infections is highly important in order to implement appropriate intervention strategy on affected herds [66]. Diagnosis of PCV2 infections could be done basically in two major ways. Firstly, on the basis of clinical disease manifestations, which could be regarded as tentative, and, secondly, based on the confirmatory detection of PCV2 antigen in lymphoid tissues and organs such as the liver, lungs, kidney, or intestine of an infected animal [89]. According to Gillespie et al. [89], for a farm to be tagged as experiencing PCVAD disease, percentages of clinical signs could be seen as follows: loss of weight (98.1%), diarrhea (77.2%), lymphadenopathy (44.8%), dyspnea (75.1%), central neurologic signs (39.6%), inappetence (90.4%), jaundice (37.1%), and death (96.8%). However, in a situation whereby a farm is experiencing subclinical infection, true status of such herd as regarded to PCV2 infection could be mistaken if based on clinical signs manifestation. This is because majority of clinically healthy pigs could be seropositive meaning subclinical infections [89].

PCV2 antigen or nucleic acid detection in samples from a swine herd is known as the golden standard suitable for the confirmatory diagnosis of PCVAD. This has been effectively achieved through PCR, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and in situ hybridization (ISH) [66, 133]. Other diagnostic tests that have been developed and used in PCV2 detection in infected pigs include enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, immunofluorescence assay, IgM immune-peroxidase monolayer assay, serum virus neutralization assays, virus isolation, and electron microscopy [66, 134, 135].

3.4.2. Prevention, Control, and Treatment of PCV2 till Date

As a multifactorial disease which has been linked to both infectious and noninfectious factors, effective control of PCVAD can be solely achieved not only by vaccine applications but also by preventing triggering factors through improved swine management, control of coinfection, and change of genetic background of pigs through careful selection of boar for breeding. Though vaccination is traditionally considered as the most effective method for preventing viral diseases, it had been established that the protection period of vaccine against the disease is limited and that complete eradication of the virus has not be achieved through vaccination [136].

However, the currently available commercial PCV2 vaccines (Table 2), all of which are either an inactivated whole virus vaccine or subunit vaccine designed base on the immunogenic Cap protein of PCV2a, have shown effectiveness against clinical disease expression and enhanced major production parameters (mortality and average daily gain) in swine herds with PCV2 occurrence. While vaccine applications did not outrightly prevent infection with PCV2 nor restrict its spread, a reasonable reduction in the systemic viral loads and shedding had been observed, which invariably help in decreasing the load of the virus in the environment [137139]. Although, animals under vaccination could still be infected with the virus, they generally do have lower viral loads compared to those not vaccinated. Thus, currently available vaccines applied most especially as a single-dose protocol do not give sterilizing immunity in swine herds [140].

Table 2: Available commercial PCV2 vaccines and some of their features.

Moreover, the introduction of the PCV2a vaccines has been observed to cause a corresponding world-wide shift in the prevalence of genotypes from PCV2a to 2b with attendant severe clinical manifestations in vaccinated herds [141]. Also, some reports on PCVAD cases have shown that a new variant named mutant PCV2b (mPCV2b) was found in diseased pigs despite their prior vaccinations [142]. This has brought about serious concerns on possible emergence of PCV2 vaccine escape strains; however, it was observed that one of the current vaccines was effective against mPCV2b infection under experimental setup [143]. Nevertheless, it has been asserted that series of recent research findings concerning the increased PCV2 genetic diversity connotes that the available vaccines which are based on PCV2a may be inducing the observable selection pressure and possibly be the driving force behind the viral evolution [69], being pivoted on observable high nucleotide substitution rate earlier suggested for the continuous evolution of PCV2 and the emergence of novel PCV2 strains [144].

According to Constans et al. [69], some immune cells epitopes that were known to elicit immune response in the vaccine strain were not seen in the field strains, showing that there is a silent change in the antigenic profile of the strains as many nonconserved epitopes have been predicted to have immune cells functions. Furthermore, the substitutions in the epitopes have been ascertained to affect the immune response greatly, thereby causing immune escape [69]. Hence, many calls and recent research findings have raised support for a rational development of PCV2 vaccines to target evolving genotypes in order to increase the current threshold of protection against PCV2 and its associated diseases [69, 142, 145].

Based on recent laboratory findings of Peng et al. [146] there is a future possibility of producing effective commercial PCV2 antibodies and vaccines that could be based on nonvariable rep protein compared to the presently available ones that are based on variable cap protein of the virus. From the study, it was observed that the recombinant plasmids of rep gene that was constructed shows an efficient expression in the prokaryotic system and also the engineered proteins were immunogenic. Furthermore, the characterized polyclonal antiserum made with rep protein shown good reactivity and displayed considerable specificity against PCV2 in PK-15 cell line. Hence, the Rep protein seems to be having future potentials in PCV2 antibody and vaccine development [146].

The utility of commercially available PCV2 vaccines (both inactivated and subunit vaccines based on PCV2a genotype) has been proven over the years as they have shown effectiveness in decreasing mortality and increasing growth parameters in commercial swine herds [67]. There are unquestionable evidences from accumulated field data that confirms the efficacy of the commercial vaccines when production parameters such as average daily weight gain and economic gains in vaccinated pigs were compared with the unvaccinated pigs. In fact, cross-protection against other coinfecting agents is an additional advantage in the use of PCV2 vaccines [67, 147]. The good news is that, in countries where vaccination has been grossly employed, there has been an appreciable declination in the prevalence of PCV2 with good vaccination practices.

However, despite the huge successes recorded so far on PCV2 vaccines, it has been asserted that the protection period of a PCV2 vaccine against the disease is limited and that the virus could not be eradicated by a mass vaccination procedure when applied for a period of one year. This was because, after some months of stopping the intensive vaccination programme, there was a reemergence of PCV2 infection [136]. Although vaccination is recommended for healthy pigs, it is ineffective for pigs that are already infected with PCV2 [148]. In addition, the inherent potentials of vaccines to cause viral evolution [149], coupled with ineffectiveness of vaccines to prevent the multifactorial disease such as PCVAD, have necessitated urgent discovery and development of safe drugs as alternatives in a bid to eradicate or control PCV2 [150].

3.4.3. Promising Efforts on Ethnobotanicals

Recently, research efforts have been focused on developing antiviral drugs from natural compounds with promising outcomes. In a recent study in which twenty natural compounds isolated from traditional Chinese plants were evaluated for their antiviral activities against PCV2 in vitro, it was observed that Matrine (an alkaloid compound purified from the dried roots of Sophora flavescens Ait) and Scutellarin (a flavonoid compound from Scutellaria barbata D. Don) showed appreciable inhibition rates of 57 and 72.69%, respectively, against the virus out of all the tested compounds [148]. Furthermore, in a more recent study aimed at exploring the antiviral potential of Matrine against PRRSV and PCV2 concurrent infection in a porcine alveolar microphages (PAM) cell model, it was observed that the use of Matrine abated the proliferation of PRRSV and PCV2 effectively at twelve-hour postinfection period. This finding further necessitates the need for immediate exploration of natural products such as Matrine as antiviral agent against PCV2 in clinical settings [150].

In another related study which is aimed at investigating the antiviral activity of a phenylpropanoid dibenzylbutyrolactone lignan called Arctigenin (ACT), extracted from another Chinese traditional herb named Arctium lappa L. against PCV2 in vitro and in vivo, another promising result was obtained. It was observed that dosage of 15.6–62.5 μg/mL of ACT efficiently inhibit the thriving of PCV2 in PK-15 cells, while the intraperitoneal injection of 200 μg/kg of ACT into PCV2-challenged mice significantly inhibited PCV2 proliferation in the lungs, spleens, and inguinal lymph nodes of the mice, showing similar effect to ribavirin, an antiviral drug that was used as positive control, thereby demonstrating the effectiveness of ACT as an antiviral agent against PCV2 both in vitro and in vivo [151].

4. Global Status of PCV2 and Its Associated Diseases: Sub-Saharan Africa Scenario

4.1. PCV2 and Its PMWS: Is the Global Disease a Global Concern?

Sequel to the first known outbreak and description of porcine multisystemic wasting syndrome, an important PCVAD in a very healthy, farrow-to-finish swine farm situated in Northeastern Saskatchewan, Western Canada, North America, in early 1990s [15, 152, 153], PMWS and other PCVADs have been subsequently seen in all regions of the world including many European countries such as Spain [21], France [154], Hungary [155], and United Kingdom [19, 36]; South America countries such as Brazil [156] and Uruguay [157]; Asian countries such as Korea [158] and China [159]; Oceania, Australia [160]; Caribbean, Cuba [161]; Middle East, Israel [162]; and African countries such as South Africa [119] and, recently, Uganda [53]. The ubiquitous status of Porcine circovirus and its numerous associated diseases has been said to be linked to the marketing of subclinically infected pigs vis-á-vis the choosing of such pigs for breeding programmes as the virus is known to be spread through semen from boars [5, 163].

Vidigal et al. [5] reported significant link between the routes of dispersal of PCV2 and international marketing of live pigs from obtained data, thereby showing how important the movements of livestock around the globe could be in the emergence and spread of new pathogens. Therefore, increase in the global trade of livestock and their products and increase in global livestock production as a result of the use of intensive animal rearing system have arguably contribute to the spread of infectious pathogens globally [5, 149, 164]. In addition to those mentioned facts and the multiple transmission routes earlier described for PCV2 coupled with the long-lasting viral life, the significance of world-wide proliferation of PCV2 in influencing the PMWS epidemics is indicated [27, 144, 165].

4.2. Incidence of Porcine circovirus Type 2 in Swine-Producing Countries of Sub-Saharan Africa
4.2.1. First Emergence of PCV2 in South African Swine Herds

Drew et al. [119] reported what seemed to be the first cases of PCV2 associated diseases in the region, which occurred in Gauteng Province, South Africa. The cases occurred in June 2001 on a large, well-managed breeding unit which serves as supplier of breeding stock to three member farms, separated by distances 100 and 500 km apart. The initial clinical manifestation observed in the pigs was PDNS which affects young pigs of two to three months old. In no distant time, the expression of clinical signs associated with PMWS became more evident, to the extent that by November 2001, the morbidity due to PMWS had increased to about 30 to 40% with mortality remaining below 10% [119].

Moreover, clinical manifestations of PMWS were also seen in approximately the same percentage of pigs of the same ages bred on one of the member farms, specifically, the one situated about 100 km away from the main farm after the introduction of pigs from the main farm, on which the disease had first been noticed. However, tissues were collected from just two affected animals of about 12 to 15 weeks of age from each of the two premises and were submitted for histological, immunohistological, and molecular analysis. Tissues sections from the spleen, liver, brain, and heart of the four pigs did not show significant histopathology. It was observed that the lesions indicative of PMWS were concentrated in the precapsular, bronchial, and gastrohepatic lymph nodes. Also in many subcapsular areas in the lymph nodes, there were widespread areas of diffuse lymphocyte depletion with presence of multinucleate giant cells as evidence occasionally [119].

Furthermore, the molecular analysis of a 501-nucleotide fragments of the viral genome amplified from tissues samples of the reported cases revealed that they were identical to a PCV2 isolate from Iowa, USA, with GenBank Ascension number AF264039 [166], having just only two nucleotide substitutions from the USA isolate. The sequence obtained from a lymph node of a piglet from the main farm yielded the complete PCV2 genome (1768 base pairs) and was designated SAI, this is the only isolate deposited so far in the GenBank with ascension number AY325495 from South Africa and virtually in the entire sub-Saharan Africa. In their conclusion, Drew et al. [119] recommended for further molecular epidemiological studies to investigate PCV2 at other sites in South Africa. However till this time, little or no work has been done to that effect in South African pig population.

This assertion is further confirmed by more recent research work of Mokoele et al. [167] in which it was categorically stated that “though PCV2 may be an economically important disease in South Africa, to date, no specific surveillance has been conducted to validate the current status because the disease is thought to be ubiquitous in most countries.” However, seeming negligence to know the health status of swine herds of the country as regarding the ubiquitous viral pathogen could pose a serious problem for the industry in a nearest future due to a recent observation during a field trip which was part of our ongoing research work that is focused on determining the occurrence of some RNA and DNA viruses in swine herds of Eastern Cape Province South Africa; pigs with typical clinical manifestations of PMWS were seen (Figure 3), showing likelihood of existence of the viral pathogen in pig herds of the country.

Figure 3: Wasting appearance of a pig with a notable respiratory distress within a herd of the same age at a farm in Lukhanji Local Municipality, Chris-Hani District, Eastern Cape, South Africa (Picture taken in April, 2016 during a sampling exercise).

In another study by An et al. [168], nucleotide sequences of 197 PCV2 strains submitted to GenBank nucleotide database at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) from all over the world and 36 PCV2 strains obtained from PMWS and PDNS cases in Korean pigs over an 8-year period were used in grouping PCV2 into two groups (1 and 2) by phylogenetic tree analysis and multiple alignments of nucleotide sequences. In their study, it was observed that three countries, namely, South Africa, United Kingdom, and Thailand, were having just one PCV2 complete genome sequence each on GenBank as far back as then, indicating dearth of information on PCV2 from the three countries. They recommended further studies on PCV2 from the countries so that accurate documentation of PCV2 strains circulating in the three countries could be done. However till date, nothing has been done in South Africa as regarding the clarion call.

4.2.2. PCV2 in Ugandan Pigs

Recently, Ojok et al. [53] also reported on the molecular detection and characterization of PCV2 from pigs in Uganda, however with limitation of using a relatively small sample size () like that of Drew et al. [119]. Only three cases of PCV2 were found in their study and they also recommended that further studies be conducted so as to fully understand the true prevalence of the virus in swine population of Uganda as well as their genetic diversity. The three PCV2 sequences in their study were observed to cluster with PCV2b genotype which was originally referred to as the European cluster or PCV2 group 1 in contrast to the South African strain which clustered with the PCV2a previously referred to as the North American strains or PCV2 group 2.

In a similar unpublished study conducted by Jonsson [169] aimed at investigating the disease transmission patterns in the livestock-wildlife interface in Uganda, being part of the Emerging Infectious Diseases (EID) surveillance programme conducted to study the prevalence of PCV2 in domestic pigs in Uganda, ninety-one domestic pigs around Murchison Falls national park were sampled and analysed. The sampled domestic pigs were all negative for PCV2a, while for PCV2b which is known to be genogroup mostly associated with PMWS, a point prevalence of 77% was reported. This is in support of the findings of Ojok et al. [53] that reported the presence of PCV2b genotype in a separate study on Ugandan pigs. The point prevalence of 77% for PCV2b in the study cannot be generalised to all of Ugandan pigs; this is because the sample selection was too small to arrive at such conclusion. As a result of this, more extensive studies were recommended by Jonsson [169], so as to obtain more accurate data on the prevalence of the PCV2b in Ugandan pigs.

4.2.3. PCV2 till Date in Cameroonian Pigs

The study of Ndze et al. [170] is another recent effort aimed at describing the occurrence and genetic diversity of selected DNA viruses belonging to different families, namely, Adenoviridae, Circoviridae, Anelloviridae, and Parvoviridae in Cameroonian pigs. However, only viruses belonging to the family Parvoviridae were detected, most especially those within the bocaviruses. In their remarks, they attributed their failure to detect other groups of viruses including Circovirus which is known to be ubiquitous to several possible factors including but not limited to short sampling period and low study sample number.

5. Conclusion

So far, the status of porcine circovirus type 2 is practically unknown in pigs of many swine-producing countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Moreover, countries where some research works have been done till date are having insufficient data that could enhance the detailed characterization of the viral genogroup that may likely be in circulation in swine herds of many countries within the region. There is, therefore, an urgent need for large scale molecular epidemiological studies on the virus and its associated diseases in the region, including origins of observed genogroups. This will help in facilitating adequate preventive and control measures against the pathogen through the establishment of effective vaccination regime that could help in combating this globally important and emerging porcine viral pathogen with huge economic implications in the global pig industry.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the National Research Foundation (NRF), South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), and Govan Mbeki Research and Development Centre (GMRDC) of University of Fort Hare for their financial supports.

References

  1. FAO, Pig Sector Kenya. FAO Animal Production and Health Livestock Country Reviews, No. 3, FAO, Rome, Italy, 2012.
  2. S. Uddin Khan, K. R. Atanasova, W. S. Krueger, A. Ramirez, and G. C. Gray, “Epidemiology, geographical distribution, and economic consequences of swine zoonoses: a narrative review,” Emerging Microbes and Infections, vol. 2, article e92, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. K. Ndyomugyenyi and J. Kyasimire, “Pig production in Kichwamba Sub-county, Rubirizi district, Uganda,” Livestock Research for Rural Development, vol. 27, no. 10, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. M. Dione, E. A. Ouma, K. Roesel, J. Kungu, P. Lule, and D. Pezo, “Participatory assessment of animal health and husbandry practices in smallholder pig production systems in three high poverty districts in Uganda,” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 117, no. 3-4, pp. 565–576, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. M. P. Vidigal, C. L. Mafra, F. M. F. Silva, J. L. R. Fietto, A. Silva Júnior, and M. R. Almeida, “Tripping over emerging pathogens around the world: a phylogeographical approach for determining the epidemiology of Porcine circovirus-2 (PCV-2), considering global trading,” Virus Research, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 320–327, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. Baekbo, C. S. Kristensen, and L. E. Larsen, “Porcine circovirus diseases: a review of PMWS,” Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 60–67, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. X. Wang, K. He, W. Wang et al., “Genetic variation of porcine circovirus type 2 isolate 201105ZJ,” Agricultural Science and Technology, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1860–1864, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  8. C. Chae, “A review of porcine circovirus 2-associated syndromes and diseases,” Veterinary Journal, vol. 169, no. 3, pp. 326–336, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. M. Allan, S. Kennedy, F. McNeilly et al., “Experimental reproduction of severe wasting disease by co-infection of pigs with porcine circovirus and porcine parvovirus,” Journal of Comparative Pathology, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. Anoopraj, T. K. Rajkhowa, S. Cherian et al., “Genetic characterisation and phylogenetic analysis of PCV2 isolates from India: indications for emergence of natural inter-genotypic recombinants,” Infection, Genetics and Evolution, vol. 31, pp. 25–32, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. I. Tischer, R. Rasch, and G. Tochtermann, “Characterization of papovavirus-and picornavirus-like particles in permanent pig kidney cell lines,” ZBL.BAKT.REIHE A, vol. 226, no. 2, pp. 153–167, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. I. Tischer, H. Gelderblom, W. Vettermann, and M. A. Koch, “A very small porcine virus with circular single-stranded DNA,” Nature, vol. 295, no. 5844, pp. 64–66, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. M. Allan, F. McNeilly, J. P. Cassidy et al., “Pathogenesis of porcine circovirus; experimental infections of colostrum deprived piglets and examination of pig foetal material,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 49–64, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. I. Tischer, W. Mields, D. Wolff, M. Vagt, and W. Griem, “Studies on epidemiology and pathogenicity of porcine circovirus,” Archives of Virology, vol. 91, no. 3-4, pp. 271–276, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. G. Clark, “Post-weaning multisystemic syndrome,” in Proceedings of the Western Canadian Association of Swine Practitioners Conference, pp. 22–25, 1996.
  16. J. Harding, “Post-weaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS): preliminary epidemiology and clinical presentation,” in Proceedings of the Western Canadian Association of Swine Practitioners, p. 21, 1996.
  17. J. Ellis, “Porcine circovirus: a historical perspective,” Veterinary Pathology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 315–327, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Bratanich, M. Lairmore, W. Heneine et al., “Lack of evidence of conserved lentiviral sequences in pigs with post weaning multisystemic wasting syndrome,” Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 207–211, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. M. Allan, F. McNeilly, S. Kennedy et al., “Isolation of porcine circovirus-like viruses from pigs with a wasting disease in the USA and Europe,” Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3–10, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. C. S. Harding, E. G. Clark, J. H. Strokappe, P. I. Willson, and J. A. Ellis, “Postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome: epidemiology and clinical presentation,” Journal of Swine Health and Production, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 249–254, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Segalés, M. Sitjar, M. Domingo et al., “First report of post-weaning multisystemic wasting syndrome in pigs in Spain,” Veterinary Record, vol. 141, no. 23, pp. 600–601, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. Allan, B. Meehan, D. Todd et al., “Novel porcine circoviruses from pigs with wasting disease syndromes,” The Veterinary Record, vol. 142, no. 17, pp. 467–468, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. B. M. Meehan, F. McNeilly, D. Todd et al., “Characterization of novel circovirus DNAs associated with wasting syndromes in pigs,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 79, no. 9, pp. 2171–2179, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. G. M. Allan, F. Mc Neilly, B. M. Meehan et al., “Isolation and characterisation of circoviruses from pigs with wasting syndromes in Spain, Denmark and Northern Ireland,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 115–123, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Segalés, G. M. Allan, and M. Domingo, “Porcine circovirus diseases,” Animal health research reviews / Conference of Research Workers in Animal Diseases, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 119–142, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Segalés, “Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) infections: clinical signs, pathology and laboratory diagnosis,” Virus Research, vol. 164, no. 1-2, pp. 10–19, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. N. Rose, T. Opriessnig, B. Grasland, and A. Jestin, “Epidemiology and transmission of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2),” Virus Research, vol. 164, no. 1-2, pp. 78–89, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. B. Jacobsen, L. Krueger, F. Seeliger, M. Bruegmann, J. Segalés, and W. Baumgaertner, “Retrospective study on the occurrence of porcine circovirus 2 infection and associated entities in Northern Germany,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 138, no. 1-2, pp. 27–33, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. Grau-Roma, L. Fraile, and J. Segalés, “Recent advances in the epidemiology, diagnosis and control of diseases caused by porcine circovirus type 2,” Veterinary Journal, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. R. Pringle, “Virus taxonomy at the XIth International Congress of Virology, Sydney, Australia,” Archives of Virology, vol. 144, no. 10, pp. 2065–2070, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. McNulty, J. Dale, P. Lukert, A. Mankertz, J. Randles, and D. Todd, “Circoviridae,” in Seventh Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, M. H. V. van Regenmortel, C. M. Fauquet, D. H. L. Bishop et al., Eds., pp. 299–303, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  32. P. Biagini, M. Bendinelli, S. Hino et al., “Family circoviridae,” in Virus Taxonomy: Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses: Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, A. M. Q. King, M. J. Adams, E. B. Carstens, and E. J. Lefkowitz, Eds., pp. 343–349, Academic Press, London, UK, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  33. B. M. Meehan, J. L. Creelan, M. Stewart McNulty, and D. Todd, “Sequence of porcine circovirus DNA: affinities with plant circoviruses,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 78, pp. 221–227, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. F. D. Niagro, A. N. Forsthoefel, R. P. Lawther et al., “Beak and feather disease virus and porcine circovirus genomes: intermediates between the geminiviruses and plant circoviruses,” Archives of Virology, vol. 143, no. 9, pp. 1723–1744, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. R. Sanchez, H. Nauwynck, and M. Pensaert, “Serological survey of porcine circovirus 2 antibodies in domestic and feral pig populations in Belgium,” in Proceedings of the Conference on ssDNA Viruses of Plants, Birds, Pigs and Primates Meeting, p. 122, 2000.
  36. S. S. Grierson, D. P. King, T. Sandvik et al., “Detection and genetic typing of type 2 porcine circoviruses in archived pig tissues from the UK,” Archives of Virology, vol. 149, no. 6, pp. 1171–1183, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. Krakowka, G. Allan, J. Ellis et al., “A nine-base nucleotide sequence in the porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) nucleocapsid gene determines viral replication and virulence,” Virus Research, vol. 164, no. 1-2, pp. 90–99, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. I. W. Walker, C. A. Konoby, V. A. Jewhurst et al., “Development and application of a competitive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of serum antibodies to porcine circovirus type 2,” Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 400–405, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. R. Magar, P. Müller, and R. Larochelle, “Retrospective serological survey of antibodies to porcine circovirus type 1 and type 2,” Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 184–186, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. G. M. Rodríguez-Arrioja, J. Segalés, C. Rosell et al., “Retrospective study on porcine circovirus type 2 infection in pigs from 1985 to 1997 in Spain,” Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 99–101, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. K. Rosario, M. Breitbart, B. Harrach et al., “Revisiting the taxonomy of the family Circoviridae: establishment of the genus Cyclovirus and removal of the genus Gyrovirus,” Archives of Virology, pp. 1–17, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. E. Delwart and L. Li, “Rapidly expanding genetic diversity and host range of the Circoviridae viral family and other Rep encoding small circular ssDNA genomes,” Virus Research, vol. 164, no. 1-2, pp. 114–121, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. L. Li, A. Kapoor, B. Slikas et al., “Multiple diverse circoviruses infect farm animals and are commonly found in human and chimpanzee feces,” Journal of Virology, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 1674–1682, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. I. Morozov, T. Sirinarumitr, S. D. Sorden et al., “Detection of a novel strain of porcine circovirus in pigs with postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 2535–2541, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. Mankertz and B. Hillenbrand, “Analysis of transcription of porcine circovirus type 1,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 2743–2751, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. S.-L. Zhai, S.-N. Chen, Z.-H. Xu et al., “Porcine circovirus type 2 in China: an update on and insights to its prevalence and control,” Virology Journal, vol. 11, article 88, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. A. Mankertz, J. Mankertz, K. Wolf, and H.-J. Buhk, “Identification of a protein essential for replication of porcine circovirus,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 381–384, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. P. Nawagitgul, I. Morozov, S. R. Bolin, P. A. Harms, S. D. Sorden, and P. S. Paul, “Open reading frame 2 of porcine circovirus type 2 encodes a major capsid protein,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 2281–2287, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. Liu, I. Chen, and J. Kwang, “Characterization of a previously unidentified viral protein in porcine circovirus type 2-infected cells and its role in virus-induced apoptosis,” Journal of Virology, vol. 79, no. 13, pp. 8262–8274, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. Liu, I. Chen, Q. Du, H. Chua, and J. Kwang, “The ORF3 protein of porcine circovirus type 2 is involved in viral pathogenesis in vivo,” Journal of Virology, vol. 80, no. 10, pp. 5065–5073, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. Gu, L. Wang, Y. Jin et al., “Characterization of specific antigenic epitopes and the nuclear export signal of the Porcine circovirus 2 ORF3 protein,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 184, pp. 40–50, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. J. He, J. Cao, N. Zhou, Y. Jin, J. Wu, and J. Zhou, “Identification and functional analysis of the novel ORF4 protein encoded by porcine circovirus type 2,” Journal of Virology, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 1420–1429, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. L. Ojok, J. B. Okuni, C. Hohloch, W. Hecht, and M. Reinacher, “Detection and characterisation of porcine circovirus 2 from Ugandan pigs,” Indian Journal of Veterinary Pathology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 77–80, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  54. A. L. Hamel, L. L. Lin, C. Sachvie, E. Grudeski, and G. P. Nayar, “PCR detection and characterization of type-2 porcine circovirus,” Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 44–52, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. G. Franzo, M. Cortey, A. Olvera et al., “Revisiting the taxonomical classification of Porcine Circovirus type 2 (PCV2): still a real challenge,” Virology Journal, vol. 12, article 131, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. L. J. Guo, Y. H. Lu, Y. W. Wei, L. P. Huang, and C. M. Liu, “Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2): genetic variation and newly emerging genotypes in China,” Virology Journal, vol. 7, article 273, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. J. Segalés, A. Olvera, L. Grau-Roma et al., “PCV-2 genotype definition and nomenclature,” Veterinary Record, vol. 162, no. 26, pp. 867–868, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. K. Dupont, E. O. Nielsen, P. Baekbo, and L. E. Larsen, “Genomic analysis of PCV2 isolates from Danish archives and a current PMWS case-control study supports a shift in genotypes with time,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 128, no. 1-2, pp. 56–64, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. G. Franzo, M. Cortey, A. M. M. G. D. Castro et al., “Genetic characterisation of Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) strains from feral pigs in the Brazilian Pantanal: an opportunity to reconstruct the history of PCV2 evolution,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 178, no. 1-2, pp. 158–162, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. X. Liu, F.-X. Wang, H.-W. Zhu, N. Sun, and H. Wu, “Phylogenetic analysis of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) isolates from China with high homology to PCV2c,” Archives of Virology, vol. 161, no. 6, pp. 1591–1599, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. C. Xiao, K. M. Harmon, P. G. Halbur, and T. Opriessnig, “PCV2d-2 is the predominant type of PCV2 DNA in pig samples collected in the U.S. during 2014–2016,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 197, pp. 72–77, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. T. Kwon, D. Lee, S. J. Yoo, S. H. Je, J. Y. Shin, and Y. S. Lyoo, “Genotypic diversity of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) and genotype shift to PCV2d in Korean pig population,” Virus Research, vol. 228, pp. 24–29, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. C.-T. Xiao, P. G. Halbur, and T. Opriessnig, “Global molecular genetic analysis of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) sequences confirms the presence of four main PCV2 genotypes and reveals a rapid increase of PCV2d,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 96, no. 7, pp. 1830–1841, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. C. Chae, “An emerging porcine circovirus type 2b mutant (mPCV2b) originally known as PCV2d,” Veterinary Journal, vol. 203, no. 1, pp. 6–9, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. M. Cortey, A. Olvera, L. Grau-Roma, and J. Segalés, “Further comments on porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) genotype definition and nomenclature,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 149, no. 3-4, pp. 522–523, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. T. Opriessnig, X. J. Meng, and P. G. Halbur, “Porcine circovirus type 2-associated disease: update on current terminology, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and intervention strategies,” Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 591–615, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. N. M. Beach and X.-J. Meng, “Efficacy and future prospects of commercially available and experimental vaccines against porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2),” Virus Research, vol. 164, no. 1-2, pp. 33–42, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. G. M. Allan, F. McNeilly, M. McMenamy et al., “Temporal distribution of porcine circovirus 2 genogroups recovered from postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome-affected and -nonaffected farms in Ireland and Northern Ireland,” Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 668–673, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. M. Constans, M. Ssemadaali, O. Kolyvushko, and S. Ramamoorthy, “Antigenic determinants of possible vaccine escape by porcine circovirus subtype 2b viruses,” Bioinformatics and Biology Insights, vol. 9, pp. 1–12, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. M. Cortey, E. Pileri, M. Sibila et al., “Genotypic shift of porcine circovirus type 2 from PCV-2a to PCV-2b in Spain from 1985 to 2008,” Veterinary Journal, vol. 187, no. 3, pp. 363–368, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. C. A. Gagnon, D. Tremblay, P. Tijssen, M.-H. Venne, A. Houde, and S. M. Elahi, “The emergence of porcine circovirus 2b genotype (PCV-2b) in swine in Canada,” Canadian Veterinary Journal, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 811–819, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. L. Huang, Y. Wang, Y. Wei et al., “Capsid proteins from PCV2a genotype confer greater protection against a PCV2b strain than those from PCV2b genotype in pigs: evidence for PCV2b strains becoming more predominant than PCV2a strains from 2000 to 2010s,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 100, no. 13, pp. 5933–5943, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. T. Opriessnig, S. Ramamoorthy, D. M. Madson et al., “Differences in virulence among porcine circovirus type 2 isolates are unrelated to cluster type 2a or 2b and prior infection provides heterologous protection,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 2482–2491, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. K. M. Lager, P. C. Gauger, A. L. Vincent, T. Opriessnig, M. E. Kehrli Jr., and A. K. Cheung, “Mortality in pigs given porcine circovirus type 2 subgroup 1 and 2 viruses derived from DNA clones,” Veterinary Record, vol. 161, no. 12, pp. 428–429, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. A. Tomás, L. T. Fernandes, O. Valero, and J. Segalés, “A meta-analysis on experimental infections with porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2),” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 132, no. 3-4, pp. 260–273, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. D. J. Lefebvre, S. Costers, J. Van Doorsselaere, G. Misinzo, P. L. Delputte, and H. J. Nauwynck, “Antigenic differences among porcine circovirus type 2 strains, as demonstrated by the use of monoclonal antibodies,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 177–187, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. S.-B. Shang, Y.-L. Jin, X.-T. Jiang et al., “Fine mapping of antigenic epitopes on capsid proteins of porcine circovirus, and antigenic phenotype of porcine circovirus Type 2,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 327–334, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. A. K. Cheung, K. M. Lager, O. I. Kohutyuk et al., “Detection of two porcine circovirus type 2 genotypic groups in United States swine herds,” Archives of Virology, vol. 152, no. 5, pp. 1035–1044, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. A. Olvera, M. Cortey, and J. Segalés, “Molecular evolution of porcine circovirus type 2 genomes: phylogeny and clonality,” Virology, vol. 357, no. 2, pp. 175–185, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. L. Guo, Y. Fu, Y. Wang et al., “A porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) mutant with 234 amino acids in Capsid protein showed more virulence in vivo, compared with classical PCV2a/b strain,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 7, Article ID e41463, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. T. Opriessnig, C.-T. Xiao, P. F. Gerber, and P. G. Halbur, “Emergence of a novel mutant PCV2b variant associated with clinical PCVAD in two vaccinated pig farms in the U.S. concurrently infected with PPV2,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 163, no. 1-2, pp. 177–183, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. C.-T. Xiao, P. G. Halbur, and T. Opriessnig, “Complete genome sequence of a novel porcine circovirus type 2b variant present in cases of vaccine failures in the United States,” Journal of Virology, vol. 86, no. 22, pp. 12469–12469, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. H. W. Seo, J. Lee, K. Han, C. Park, and C. Chae, “Comparative analyses of humoral and cell-mediated immune responses upon vaccination with different commercially available single-dose porcine circovirus type 2 vaccines,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 38–42, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. R. L. Salgado, P. M. Vidigal, L. F. de Souza et al., “Identification of an emergent porcine circovirus-2 in vaccinated pigs from a brazilian farm during a postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome outbreak,” Genome Announcements, vol. 2, no. 2, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. N. Ramos, S. Mirazo, G. Castro, and J. Arbiza, “First identification of Porcine Circovirus Type 2b mutant in pigs from Uruguay,” Infection, Genetics and Evolution, vol. 33, pp. 320–323, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. M. Eddicks, R. Fux, F. Szikora et al., “Detection of a new cluster of porcine circovirus type 2b strains in domestic pigs in Germany,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 176, no. 3-4, pp. 337–343, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. G. Reiner, R. Hofmeister, and H. Willems, “Genetic variability of porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) field isolates from vaccinated and non-vaccinated pig herds in Germany,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 180, no. 1-2, pp. 41–48, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. N. E. McKeown, T. Opriessnig, P. Thomas et al., “Effects of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) maternal antibodies on experimental infection of piglets with PCV2,” Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1347–1351, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. J. Gillespie, T. Opriessnig, X. J. Meng, K. Pelzer, and V. Buechner-Maxwell, “Porcine circovirus type 2 and porcine circovirus-associated disease,” Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1151–1163, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. X.-J. Meng, “Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2): pathogenesis and interaction with the immune system,” Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, vol. 1, pp. 43–64, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. C. Chae, “Porcine circovirus type 2 and its associated diseases in Korea,” Virus Research, vol. 164, no. 1-2, pp. 107–113, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. J.-S. Park, J. Kim, Y. Ha et al., “Birth abnormalities in pregnant sows infected intranasally with porcine circovirus 2,” Journal of Comparative Pathology, vol. 132, no. 2-3, pp. 139–144, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. C. Salogni, M. Lazzaro, E. Giacomini et al., “Infectious agents identified in aborted swine fetuses in a high-density breeding area: A Three-Year Study,” Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 550–554, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. P. A. Harms, S. D. Sorden, P. G. Halbur et al., “Experimental reproduction of severe disease in CD/CD pigs concurrently infected with type 2 porcine circovirus and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus,” Veterinary Pathology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 528–539, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. J. Kim, H.-K. Chung, and C. Chae, “Association of porcine circovirus 2 with porcine respiratory disease complex,” Veterinary Journal, vol. 166, no. 3, pp. 251–256, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. C. Rosell, J. Segalés, J. A. Ramos-Vara et al., “Identification of porcine circovirus in tissues of pigs with porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome,” Veterinary Record, vol. 146, no. 2, pp. 40–43, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. G. J. Wellenberg, N. Stockhofe-Zurwieden, M. F. De Jong, W. J. A. Boersma, and A. R. W. Elbers, “Excessive porcine circovirus type 2 antibody titres may trigger the development of porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome: A Case-Control Study,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 99, no. 3-4, pp. 203–214, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. J. Kim, Y. Ha, K. Jung, C. Choi, and C. Chae, “Enteritis associated with porcine circovirus 2 in pigs,” Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 218–221, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. G. W. Stevenson, M. Kiupel, S. K. Mittal, J. Choi, K. S. Latimer, and C. L. Kanitz, “Tissue distribution and genetic typing of porcine circoviruses in pigs with naturally occurring congenital tremors,” Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 57–62, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. Y. Ha, K. Jung, and C. Chae, “Lack of evidence of porcine circovirus type 1 and type 2 infection in piglets with congenital tremors in Korea,” Veterinary Record, vol. 156, no. 12, pp. 383–384, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. S. Kennedy, J. Segalés, A. Rovira et al., “Absence of evidence of porcine circovirus infection in piglets with congenital tremors,” Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 151–156, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. P. Tummaruk and P. Pearodwong, “Porcine circovirus type 2 expression in the brain of neonatal piglets with congenital tremor,” Comparative Clinical Pathology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 727–732, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. F. Hasslung, P. Wallgren, A.-S. Ladekjær-Hansen et al., “Experimental reproduction of postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) in pigs in Sweden and Denmark with a Swedish isolate of porcine circovirus type 2,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 106, no. 1-2, pp. 49–60, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. T. Opriessnig and P. G. Halbur, “Concurrent infections are important for expression of porcine circovirus associated disease,” Virus Research, vol. 164, no. 1-2, pp. 20–32, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. Y. Li, H. Liu, P. Wang et al., “RNA-seq analysis reveals genes underlying different disease responses to porcine circovirus type 2 in pigs,” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 5, Article ID e0155502, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. R. Patterson, A. Nevel, A. V. Diaz et al., “Exposure to environmental stressors result in increased viral load and further reduction of production parameters in pigs experimentally infected with PCV2b,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 177, no. 3-4, pp. 261–269, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. S. Kennedy, D. Moffett, F. McNeilly et al., “Reproduction of lesions of postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome by infection of conventional pigs with porcine circovirus type 2 alone or in combination with porcine parvovirus,” Journal of Comparative Pathology, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 9–24, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. B. Lukač, A. Knežević, N. Milić et al., “Molecular detection of PCV2 and PPV in pigs in Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina,” Acta Veterinaria, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. J. Sun, L. Huang, Y. Wei et al., “Prevalence of emerging porcine parvoviruses and their co-infections with porcine circovirus type 2 in China,” Archives of Virology, vol. 160, no. 5, pp. 1339–1344, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. G. M. Allan, F. McNeilly, J. Ellis et al., “Experimental infection of colostrum deprived piglets with porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) potentiates PCV2 replication,” Archives of Virology, vol. 145, no. 11, pp. 2421–2429, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. P. M. Dorr, R. B. Baker, G. W. Almond, S. R. Wayne, and W. A. Gebreyes, “Epidemiologic assessment of porcine circovirus type 2 coinfection with other pathogens in swine,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, vol. 230, no. 2, pp. 244–250, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. Y. Yang, R. Shi, R. She et al., “Fatal disease associated with Swine Hepatitis E virus and Porcine circovirus 2 co-infection in four weaned pigs in China,” BMC Veterinary Research, vol. 11, no. 1, article 77, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. T. Opriessnig, E. L. Thacker, S. Yu, M. Fenaux, X.-J. Meng, and P. G. Halbur, “Experimental reproduction of postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome in pigs by dual infection with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus type 2,” Veterinary Pathology, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 624–640, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. Y. Ha, K. Jung, K. Kim, C. Choi, and C. Chae, “Outbreak of salmonellosis in pigs with postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome,” Veterinary Record, vol. 156, no. 18, pp. 583–584, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. C. E. Dewey, W. T. Johnston, L. Gould, and T. L. Whiting, “Postweaning mortality in Manitoba swine,” Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 161–167, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. G. Marruchella, B. Paoletti, R. Speranza, and G. Di Guardo, “Fatal bronchopneumonia in a Metastrongylus elongatus and Porcine circovirus type 2 co-infected pig,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 310–312, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. X.-J. Meng, “Spread like a wildfire—the omnipresence of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) and its ever-expanding association with diseases in pigs,” Virus Research, vol. 164, no. 1-2, pp. 1–3, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. G. Franzo, C. M. Tucciarone, G. Dotto, A. Gigli, L. Ceglie, and M. Drigo, “International trades, local spread and viral evolution: the case of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) strains heterogeneity in Italy,” Infection, Genetics and Evolution, vol. 32, pp. 409–415, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. T. W. Drew, S. S. Grierson, D. P. King et al., “Genetic similarity between porcine circovirus type 2 isolated from the first reported case of PMWS in South Africa and North American isolates,” Veterinary Record, vol. 155, no. 5, pp. 149–151, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. V. R. Monger, J. A. Stegeman, G. Koop, K. Dukpa, T. Tenzin, and W. L. A. Loeffen, “Seroprevalence and associated risk factors of important pig viral diseases in Bhutan,” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 222–232, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. N. Rose, G. Larour, G. Le Diguerher et al., “Risk factors for porcine post-weaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) in 149 French farrow-to-finish herds,” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 209–225, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. K. Dupont, C. K. Hjulsager, C. S. Kristensen, P. Baekbo, and L. E. Larsen, “Transmission of different variants of PCV2 and viral dynamics in a research facility with pigs mingled from PMWS-affected herds and non-affected herds,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 139, no. 3-4, pp. 219–226, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. H. Shen, C. Wang, D. M. Madson, and T. Opriessnig, “High prevalence of porcine circovirus viremia in newborn piglets in five clinically normal swine breeding herds in North America,” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 97, no. 3-4, pp. 228–236, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. P. Alarcon, M. Velasova, A. Mastin, A. Nevel, K. D. C. Stärk, and B. Wieland, “Farm level risk factors associated with severity of post-weaning multi-systemic wasting syndrome,” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 101, no. 3-4, pp. 182–191, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. M. Lőrincz, Á. Cságola, I. Biksi, L. Szeredi, Á. Dán, and T. Tuboly, “Detection of porcine circovirus in rodents—short communication,” Acta Veterinaria Hungarica, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 265–268, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. R. Blunt, S. McOrist, J. McKillen, I. McNair, T. Jiang, and K. Mellits, “House fly vector for porcine circovirus 2b on commercial pig farms,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 149, no. 3-4, pp. 452–455, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. X. Yang, L. Hou, J. Ye, Q. He, and S. Cao, “Detection of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) in mosquitoes from pig farms by PCR,” Pakistan Veterinary Journal, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 134–135, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. D. Verreault, V. Létourneau, L. Gendron, D. Massé, C. A. Gagnon, and C. Duchaine, “Airborne porcine circovirus in Canadian swine confinement buildings,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 141, no. 3-4, pp. 224–230, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. M.-T. Chiou, C.-Y. Yang, T.-C. Chang, C. Chen, C.-F. Lin, and L.-J. Ye, “Shedding pattern and serological profile of porcine circovirus type 2 infection in cesarean-derived, colostrum-deprived and farm-raised pigs,” Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 521–525, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. A. R. Patterson, D. M. Madson, P. G. Halbur, and T. Opriessnig, “Shedding and infection dynamics of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) after natural exposure,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 149, no. 1-2, pp. 225–229, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. A. R. Patterson, S. Ramamoorthy, D. M. Madson, X. J. Meng, P. G. Halbur, and T. Opriessnig, “Shedding and infection dynamics of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) after experimental infection,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 149, no. 1-2, pp. 91–98, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. J. Segalés, M. Calsamiglia, A. Olvera, M. Sibila, L. Badiella, and M. Domingo, “Quantification of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) DNA in serum and tonsillar, nasal, tracheo-bronchial, urinary and faecal swabs of pigs with and without postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS),” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 111, no. 3-4, pp. 223–229, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. I. Shibata, Y. Okuda, S. Yazawa et al., “PCR detection of Porcine circovirus type 2 DNA in whole blood, serum, oropharyngeal swab, nasal swab, and feces from experimentally infected pigs and field cases,” Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 405–408, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. C. Liu, T. Ihara, T. Nunoya, and S. Ueda, “Development of an ELISA based on the baculovirus-expressed capsid protein of porcine circovirus type 2 as antigen,” Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 237–242, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. M. Sibila, M. Calsamiglia, J. Segales et al., “Use of a polymerase chain reaction assay and an ELISA to monitor porcine circovirus type 2 infection in pigs from farms with and without postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome,” American Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 88–92, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. H. Feng, G. Blanco, J. Segalés, and M. Sibila, “Can Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) infection be eradicated by mass vaccination?” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 172, no. 1-2, pp. 92–99, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. L. Fraile, M. Sibila, M. Nofrarías et al., “Effect of sow and piglet porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) vaccination on piglet mortality, viraemia, antibody titre and production parameters,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 161, no. 1-2, pp. 229–234, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. P. F. Gerber, F. M. Garrocho, Â. M. Q. Lana, and Z. I. P. Lobato, “Serum antibodies and shedding of infectious porcine circovirus 2 into colostrum and milk of vaccinated and unvaccinated naturally infected sows,” Veterinary Journal, vol. 188, no. 2, pp. 240–242, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. J. Segalés, A. Urniza, A. Alegre et al., “A genetically engineered chimeric vaccine against porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) improves clinical, pathological and virological outcomes in postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome affected farms,” Vaccine, vol. 27, no. 52, pp. 7313–7321, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. T. Kekarainen, K. McCullough, M. Fort, C. Fossum, J. Segalés, and G. M. Allan, “Immune responses and vaccine-induced immunity against Porcine circovirus type 2,” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 136, no. 3-4, pp. 185–193, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. S. Carman, H. Y. Cai, J. DeLay et al., “The emergence of a new strain of porcine circovirus-2 in Ontario and Quebec swine and its association with severe porcine circovirus associated disease—2004–2006,” Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 259–268, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. T. Opriessnig, K. O'Neill, P. F. Gerber et al., “A PCV2 vaccine based on genotype 2b is more effective than a 2a-based vaccine to protect against PCV2b or combined PCV2a/2b viremia in pigs with concurrent PCV2, PRRSV and PPV infection,” Vaccine, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 487–494, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. T. Opriessnig, C. T. Xiao, P. F. Gerber, and P. G. Halbur, “Identification of recently described porcine parvoviruses in archived North American samples from 1996 and association with porcine circovirus associated disease,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 173, no. 1-2, pp. 9–16, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. C. Firth, M. A. Charleston, S. Duffy, B. Shapiro, and E. C. Holmes, “Insights into the evolutionary history of an emerging livestock pathogen: porcine circovirus 2,” Journal of Virology, vol. 83, no. 24, pp. 12813–12821, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. M. A. Ssemadaali, M. Ilha, and S. Ramamoorthy, “Genetic diversity of porcine circovirus type 2 and implications for detection and control,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 103, pp. 179–186, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. Z. Peng, T. Ma, D. Pang et al., “Expression, purification and antibody preparation of PCV2 Rep and ORF3 proteins,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 86, pp. 277–281, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. Z. Afghah, B. Webb, X. Meng, and S. Ramamoorthy, “Ten years of PCV2 vaccines and vaccination: is eradication a possibility?” Veterinary Microbiology, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  148. N. Sun, T. Yu, J.-X. Zhao et al., “Antiviral activities of natural compounds derived from traditional chinese medicines against porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2),” Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 180–187, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  149. J. Segalés, T. Kekarainen, and M. Cortey, “The natural history of porcine circovirus type 2: from an inoffensive virus to a devastating swine disease?” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 165, no. 1-2, pp. 13–20, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  150. N. Sun, P. Sun, H. Lv et al., “Matrine displayed antiviral activity in porcine alveolar macrophages co-infected by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and porcine circovirus type 2,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, Article ID 24401, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  151. J. Chen, W. Li, E. Jin et al., “The antiviral activity of arctigenin in traditional Chinese medicine on porcine circovirus type 2,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 106, pp. 159–164, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  152. J. Ellis, L. Hassard, E. Clark et al., “Isolation of circovirus from lesions of pigs with postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome,” Canadian Veterinary Journal, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 44–51, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  153. J. C. Harding and E. Clark, “Recognizing and diagnosing postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS),” Journal of Swine Health Production, vol. 5, pp. 201–203, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  154. P. LeCann, E. Albina, F. Madec, R. Cariolet, and A. Jestin, “Piglet wasting disease,” The Veterinary Record, vol. 141, no. 25, p. 660, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  155. Á. Dán, T. Molnár, I. Biksi, R. Glávits, M. Shaheim, and B. Harrach, “Characterisation of Hungarian porcine circovirus 2 genomes associated with PMWS and PDNS cases,” Acta Veterinaria Hungarica, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 551–562, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  156. A. M. Martins Gomes De Castro, A. Cortez, M. B. Heinemann, P. E. Brandão, and L. J. Richtzenhain, “Genetic diversity of Brazilian strains of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV-2) revealed by analysis of the cap gene (ORF-2),” Archives of Virology, vol. 152, no. 8, pp. 1435–1445, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  157. N. Ramos, S. Mirazo, G. Castro, and J. Arbiza, “Detection and molecular characterization of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) from piglets with exudative epidermitis in Uruguay,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 1042–1045, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  158. K.-S. Choi and J.-S. Chae, “Genetic characterization of porcine circovirus type 2 in Republic of Korea,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 497–501, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  159. Z.-Z. Yang, J.-B. Shuai, X.-J. Dai, and W.-H. Fang, “A survey on porcine circovirus type 2 infection and phylogenetic analysis of its ORF2 gene in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China,” Journal of Zhejiang University: Science B, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 148–153, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  160. W. R. Raye, An investigation into the status of porcine circovirus in Australia [Ph.D. thesis], Murdoch University, Perth, Australia, 2004.
  161. L. J. Pérez, H. Díaz de Arce, M. I. Percedo, P. Domínguez, and M. T. Frías, “First report of porcine circovirus type 2 infections in Cuba,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 528–530, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  162. S. P. Pozzi, H. Yadin, J. Lavi, M. Pacciarini, and L. Alborali, “Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) infection of pigs in Israel: clinical presentation, diagnosis and virus identification,” Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 122–125, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  163. F. Schmoll, C. Lang, A. S. Steinrigl, K. Schulze, and J. Kauffold, “Prevalence of PCV2 in Austrian and German boars and semen used for artificial insemination,” Theriogenology, vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 814–821, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  164. D. Tilman, K. G. Cassman, P. A. Matson, R. Naylor, and S. Polasky, “Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices,” Nature, vol. 418, no. 6898, pp. 671–677, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  165. A. R. Patterson and T. Opriessnig, “Epidemiology and horizontal transmission of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2),” Animal Health Research Reviews / Conference of Research Workers in Animal Diseases, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 217–234, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  166. M. Fenaux, P. G. Halbur, M. Gill, T. E. Toth, and X.-J. Meng, “Genetic characterization of type 2 porcine circovirus (PCV-2) from pigs with postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome in different geographic regions of North America and development of a differential PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay to detect and differentiate between infections with PCV-1 and PCV-2,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 2494–2503, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  167. J. M. Mokoele, L. Janse van Rensburg, S. van Lochem et al., “Overview of the perceived risk of transboundary pig diseases in South Africa,” Journal of the South African Veterinary Association, vol. 86, no. 1, article 1197, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  168. D.-J. An, I.-S. Roh, D.-S. Song, C.-K. Park, and B.-K. Park, “Phylogenetic characterization of porcine circovirus type 2 in PMWS and PDNS Korean pigs between 1999 and 2006,” Virus Research, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 115–122, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  169. L. Jonsson, Emerging infectious diseases: using PCV2 as a model of disease transmission dynamics at the livestock-wildlife interface in Uganda [Dissertation], Fakulteten för Veterinärmedicin och Husdjursvetenskap, Institutionen för Biomedicin och Veterinär Folkhälsovetenskap, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala, Sweden, 2013, http://stud.epsilon.slu.se/5278/7/jonsson_l_130130.pdf.
  170. V. N. Ndze, D. Cadar, A. Cságola et al., “Detection of novel porcine bocaviruses in fecal samples of asymptomatic pigs in Cameroon,” Infection, Genetics and Evolution, vol. 17, pp. 277–282, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus