Research Article | Open Access

Satoko Hayashi, Kentaro Yamane, Waro Nakanishi, "Fine Structures of 8-G-1-(-) (G = H, Cl, and Br) in Crystals and Solutions: Ethynyl Influence and Y- and G-Dependences", *Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications*, vol. 2009, Article ID 347359, 11 pages, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/347359

# Fine Structures of 8-G-1-(-) (G = H, Cl, and Br) in Crystals and Solutions: Ethynyl Influence and Y- and G-Dependences

**Academic Editor:**Govindasamy Mugesh

#### Abstract

Fine structures of 8-G-1-(-) [**1** (G = H) and **2** (G = Cl): Y = H (**a**), OMe (**b**), Me (**c**), F (**d**), Cl (**e**), CN (**f**), and (**g**)] are determined by the X-ray analysis. Structures of **1**, **2**, and **3** (G = Br) are called **A** if each Seâ bond is perpendicular to the naphthyl plane, whereas they are **B** when the bond is placed on the plane. Structures are observed as **A** for **1a**â**c** bearing Y of nonacceptors, whereas they are **B** for **1e**â**g** with Y of strong acceptors. The change in the structures of **1e**â**g** versus those of **1a**â**c** is called Y-dependence in **1**. The Y-dependence is very specific in **1** relative to 1-(-Se) (**4**) due to the ethynyl group: the Y-dependence in **1** is almost inverse to the case of **4** due to the ethynyl group. We call the specific effect â*Ethynyl Influence.*â Structures of **2** are observed as **B**: the **A**-type structure of **1b** changes dramatically to **B** of **2b** by G = Cl at the 8-position, which is called G-dependence. The structures of **2** and **3** are examined in solutions based on the NMR parameters.

#### 1. Introduction

We are much interested in extended hypervalent bonds [*m* centerâ*n* electron bonds () [1â11] higher than 3câ4e [1, 12â14]. The nature of 4câ6e [1â5] is demonstrated to be very different from that of 3câ4e [1, 12â18]. Our strategy to construct the extended hypervalent bonds is to employ the interactions caused by direct orbital overlaps between nonbonded atoms [1â11, 19â21]. Weak interactions control fine structures and create delicate functionalities of materials [15, 22â40]. Recently, extended hypervalent bonds are shown to play an important role in physical, chemical and biological properties of the compounds [41â50]. On the other hand, the ethynyl group and the derivatives are of great importance as building blocks in the material design of high functionality [51â64]. Indeed, the ethynyl and orbitals play an important role to appear specific properties in 8-G-1-() (G = OMe and ) [65], but the ethynyl and orbitals must also be of interest to originate the functionalities of materials. It will be great interest if the ethynyl group is joined to the extended hypervalent bonds constructed by the group 16 elements, such as **I** (Scheme â1).

As the first step to clarify the factors to control the fine structures of the ethynyl joined extended hypervalent compounds such as **I ^{1}**, the ethynyl influence and Y- and G-dependences as the factors to control fine structures of 8-G-1-(

*p*-) [

**1**(G = H) [66],

**2**(G = Cl) [67], and

**3**(G = Br) [67]: Y = H (

**a**), OMe (

**b**), Me (

**c**), F (

**d**), Cl (

**e**), CN (

**f**), and (

**g**)] are elucidated (Scheme 2). The Y- and G-dependences are also discussed for 8-G-1-(

*p*-) [

**4**(G = H) [22],

**5**(G = Cl) [16], and

**6**(G = Br) [16] for convenience of comparison.

**1**â

**3**are prepared and the structures of some compounds are determined by the X-ray crystallographic analysis.

Structures of the naphthalene system are well explained by the three types, **A**, **B**, and **C**, in our definition, where the bond is perpendicular to the naphthyl plane in **A**, it is placed on the plane in **B**, and **C** is intermediate between **A** and **B** [4, 15, 16, 22, 23, 68]. The **A**, **B**, and **C** notations are employed for the structures around the bonds in **1**â**6**. The planar (**pl**) and perpendicular (**pd**) notations are also used to specify the structures of **1**â**6**, where they specify the conformers around the (abbreviated ) bonds in **1**â**3** and those around in **4**â**6**. Scheme 3 illustrates plausible structures of **1**â**3**. Combined notations such as (**A**: **pl**) and (**B**: **pd**) are employed for the structures. The structures of **4** are **B** for Y of donating groups such as OMe, whereas they are **A** for Y of accepting groups such as [22]. We call the results Y-dependence. The magnitude of the p(Se)â(Ar/Nap) conjugation must be the origin of Y-dependence in **4**.

Here, we report the fine structures of **1** and **2** determined by the X-ray crystallographic analysis as a factor to control the fine structures. We call the factor â*Ethynyl Influence*â in **1** and the G-dependence arise from the nonbonded (G)() 3câ4e interaction or the G 5câ6e type interaction in **2** and **3**. The behaviors of **1**â**3** in solutions are also examined, containing the selective , -NOE difference spectroscopic measurements, to estimate the efficiency of the factors based on NMR parameters.

#### 2. Experimental

##### 2.1. Materials and Measurements

Manipulations were performed under an argon atmosphere with standard vacuum-line techniques. Glassware was dried at 130Â°C overnight. Solvents and reagents were purified by standard procedures as necessary.

Melting points were measured with a Yanaco-MP apparatus of uncollected. Flash column chromatography was performed on silica gel (Fujisilysia PSQ-100B), acidic and basic alumina (E. Merck). **1**â**3** were prepared by the methods described elsewhere [67, 68].

NMR spectra were recorded at 297âK on a JEOL AL-300âMHz spectrometer (^{1}H, 300âMHz; ^{77}Se, 57âMHz) on a JEOL ECP-400âMHz spectrometer (, 400âMHz; , 100âMHz) in chloroform-*d* solutions (0.050âM)^{2}. Chemical shifts are given in ppm relative to one of TMS for NMR spectra and relative to reference compound for NMR spectra.

##### 2.2. X-Ray Crystal Structure Determination

Single crystals of some of **1** and **2** were obtained by slow evaporation of dichloromethane-hexane and/or ethyl acetate solutions at room temperature. X-ray diffraction data were collected on a Rigaku/MSC Mercury CCD diffractometer equipped with a graphite-monochromated MoK radiation source () at 103(2) K. The structures were solved by direct methods (SIR97) [69] for **1a**â**c**, **1e**â**g**, and** 2e** and (SHELXS-97) [70] for **2b**, and (SIR2004) [71] for **2g** and refined by the full-matrix least squares method on for all reflections (SHELXL-97) [72]. All of the nonhydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. CCDC-666789 (**1a**), CCDC-666790 (**1b**), CCDC-666791 (**1c**), CCDC-666792 (**1e**), CCDC-666793 (**1f**), CCDC-666794 (**1g**), CCDC-687206 (**2b**), CCDC-687207 (**2e**), and CCDC-687208 (**2g**) are available. These data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html, or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: (+44) 1223-336-033; or e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk.

#### 3. Results and Discussion

##### 3.1. Structures of and in Crystals

Single crystals were obtained for **1a**â**c**, **1e**â**g**, **2b**, **2e**, and **2g** via slow evaporation of dichloromethane-hexane or ethyl acetate solutions. The X-ray crystallographic analyses were carried out for a suitable crystal of each compound. One type of structure corresponds to **1b**, **1c**, **1e**â**g**, **2b**, **2e**, and **2g** and two-type ones to **1a** in the crystals. The crystallographic data and the structures are reported elsewhere [66, 67]. Figure 1 summarizes structures of **1** and **2**, relative to **4**â**6**. Table 1 collects the selected interatomic distances, angles, and torsional angles, necessary for the discussion. The atomic numbering scheme is shown for **1b** in Figure 1, as an example.

| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

^{ (a) } The atomic numbering scheme is shown for 1b in Figure 1, as an example. ^{ (b) }r(Se2, C19). ^{ (c) }r(Se2, C29). ^{ (d) }â C19SeC29. ^{ (e) }â C20C19Se2. ^{ (f) }â C28C19Se2. ^{ (g) }â C28C19Se2C29. ^{ (h) }â C19Se2C31C32. ^{ (i) } Intermediate structure between (A: pd) and (A: pl). |

As shown in Figure 1 and Table 1, the structure of **1** is **A** for Y of nonacceptors (**1 **(**A**)) such as H (**a**), OMe (**b**), and Me (**c**), whereas that of **1** is **B** for Y of acceptors (**1 **(**B**)) such as Cl (**e**), CN (**f**), and (**g**) (Scheme 2). The results are quite a contrast to the case of **4**, where the structure of **4** is **B** with Y = OMe, and they are **A** when Y = Cl and . The ethynyl group interrupted between *p*- and Se changes the structures dramatically: (**B**: **pd**) of **4b** to (**A**: **pd**) of **1b**, (**A**: **pl**) of **4e** to (**B**: **pd**) of **1e**, and (**A**: **pl**) of **4** (Y = Et) to (**B**: **pl**) of **1g**, where Y = Et is employed in place of Y = for **4** [22]. The direction of Y-dependence in **1** is just the inverse to the case of **4**. We call the factor to determine the fine structure of **1** â*Ethynyl Influence*â.

The change in the structures of **1e**â**g** versus those of **1a**â**c** is called Y-dependence in **1**. The Y-dependence is very specific in **1** relative to **4** due to the ethynyl group: the Y-dependence in **1** is almost inverse to the case of **4** due to the ethynyl group. We call the specific effect â*Ethynyl Influence.*â

In the case of the structures of **2**, they are (**B**: **pd**) for **2b** and **2e** and (**B**: **pl**) for **2g**. The results exhibit that **1b** (**A**: **pd**) changes dramatically to **2b** (**B**: **pd**) by G = Cl at the 8-position in **2**. We call the effect G-dependence in **2**. The effect fixes the structure of **2** to **B**. While the variety of structures such as (**A**: **pd**), (**B**: **pd**), and (**B**: **pl**) are observed in **1**, the observed structure is only **B** in **2**. The observation is quite different from that in **1**, again. The observed structure of **1g** is substantially different from that of **6g**. Y-dependence in **2** must be very similar to that in **1**.

After explanation of the observed structures of **1** in crystals, the role of crystal packing forces is examined in relation to the fine structures of **1**.

##### 3.2. Crystal Packing Forces as Factor to Determine Fine Structure of

The structures of **1a**â**c** are observed as dimers. Figure 2 shows the dimer formed from **1a**, which contains **1a**_{A} and **1a**_{B}. Se atoms in the **1a** dimer are in short contact with C at the position of the partner molecule, and the Se1âC distance is 3.392 Ă
. Dimers of **1b** and **1c** are essentially the same as that of **1a**. An Se atom in the **1b** dimer is in short contact with C at the position of the partner molecule. The overlap between two naphthyl planes seems larger for the **1b** dimer relative to the **1a** dimer. The driving force of the dimer formation must be the energy lowering effect by the -stacking of the naphthyl groups. The () 3câ4e interaction must also contribute to stabilize the dimers. The dimer formation must stabilize the **A** structure for **1a**â**c**. It would be difficult to conclude whether the structures are **A** or **B** without such dimer formation. However, the **A** structure of **1a**â**c** would be suggested without the aid of the dimer formation by considering the electron affinity of naphthalene (NapH) and the evaluated values for *p*-CCH (Y = H, OMe, and Me), which are the components of **1**.

**(a)**

**(b)**

After the establishment of the structures of **1** and **2** in crystals, next extension is to examine the structures of **1**â**3** in solutions.

##### 3.3. Behavior of in Solutions Based on NMR Spectroscopy

9-(Arylselanyl)anthracenes [9-(*p*-Se): **7**] and 1-(arylselanyl)anthraquinones [9-(*p*-Se): **8**] with all Y shown in Scheme 2 are demonstrated to serve as the standards for the structures of (**A**: **pl**) and (**B**: **pd**) in solutions, respectively [73, 74]. Scheme 3 illustrates the structures of **7 **(**A**: **pl**) and **8 **(**B**: **pd**). Consequently, and NMR chemical shifts of **1**â**3** are also served as the standards to determine the (**A**: **pl**) and (**B**: **pd**) structures in solutions. The structures and the behaviors of **1**â**3** are investigated in solutions based on the NMR chemical shifts of **1**â**3** by comparing those of **7 **(**A**: **pl**) and **8 **(**B**: **pd**).

and NMR chemical shifts of **1**â**3** were measured in chloroform-*d* solutions (0.050âM) at 297âK.^{2} Table 2 collects the substituent induced , , and values for **1**â**3**. Table 2 also collects the values for **7 **(**A**: **pl**) and **8 **(**B**: **pd**). The values of **1**â**3 **change depending on Y, although the magnitudes are not so large. How are the changes in the chemical shifts depending on Y correlated to the structural changes in solutions? The changes in **1**â**3** are examined by comparing those in **7 **(**A**: **pl**) and **8 **(**B**: **pd**).

| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

^{ (a) } In CDCl_{3}. ^{ (b) } From TMS for (H) and from for . |

To organize the process for the analysis,(: **3**) and *ÎŽ*(Se: **3**) are plotted versus (: **2**) and* *: **2**), respectively. Figure 2 shows the plots. The correlations are given in Table 3 (entries 1 and 2, resp.). The correlations are very good (). The results show that the structure of each member in **3** is very close to that of **2**, in solutions. Therefore, the structures of **2** should be analyzed from the viewpoint of the orientational effect, together with those of **1**. The anisotropic effect of the bond in **3** (G = Br) might be stronger than that in **2 **(G = Cl), since () values of **3** (8.39â8.44) are observed slightly more downfield than those of **2** (8.30â8.38).

| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

^{(a)}The constants (a, b, r) are defined by y = ax + b (r: correlation coefficient). ^{(b)}ââY = OMe, Me, H, F, Cl, CN, and NO_{2}. ^{(c)} Y = OMe, Me, H, F, and Cl. |

As shown in Table 2, the values of **7 **(**A**: **pl**) and **8 **(**B**: **pd**) appear at 8.67â8.93 and 7.18â7.26, respectively, which should be the anisotropic effect of the phenyl group: the atom in **7 **(**A**: **pl**) exists on the in-plane area of the phenyl group, whereas it resides upside of the group in **8 **(**B**: **pd**). On the other hand, * * of **1 **appear at 7.78â7.86, whereas those of **2** are 8.30â8.38. We must be careful when the structures of **1**â**3** are considered based on , since H atoms above the bond is more deshielded which is just the inverse anisotropic effect by the phenyl group. The magnitudes of the former must be smaller than of the latter. Namely, the structures of **2** and **3** are expected to be **B** in solutions, although the slight equilibrium between **A** and **B** could not be neglected. The structures of **1** would be **A** in solutions, although **A** may equilibrate with **B** to some extent. Figure 4 shows the plots of (: **1** and **2**) versus (: **7**) and (: **8**). The plots appear from downfield to upfield in an order of (: **1**) * *(: **2**). The correlations are given in Table 3 (entries 3â6), which support above discussion.

**(a)**

**(b)**

(: **1**) and (Se: **1**) are plotted versus (: **7**) and (Se: **7**), respectively. Figure 5 shows the results. The correlations are shown in Table 3 (entries 7 and 8, resp.). The correlation of the former is good, which means that (**A**: **pl**) contributes predominantly to the structures of **1**, although the correlation constant is a negative value of â0.34. The negative value would be the reflection of the inverse anisotropic effect between the phenyl* * system and the ethynyl group. It is concluded that the structures of **1** in solutions are substantially (**A**: **pl**) with some contributions of (**B**: **pd**) and/or (**B**: **pl**) through the equilibrium. The correlation for the plot of (Se: **1**) versus (Se: **7**) also supports the conclusion, although **A** is suggested to equilibrate with **B** in solutions.

**(a)**

**(b)**

Indeed, the preferential contribution of **B** is predicted for **2**, but, the plots of (: **2**) versus (: **8**) do not give good correlations (Panel (b) of Figure 4 and entry 6 in Table 3). Although not shown, the plot of (Se: **2**) versus (Se: **8**) did not give good correlation either (entry 10 in Table 3). The plots of (Se: **2**) versus (Se: **7**) gave rather good correlation (entry 9 in Table 3). The discrepancy must come mainly from the equilibrium between (**B**: **pd**) and (**B**: **pl**). Namely, the structures of **2** are predominantly **B**, which are in equilibrium between (**B**: **pd**) and (**B**: **pl**) especially for Y of strong electron accepted groups (Scheme 5). The equilibrium with **A** would exist but the contribution must be small for most of Y.

The **B** structures of **2** and **3** in solutions are determined based on the large downfield shifts of (: **2**) and (: **3**) versus (: **1**). The reason for the structural determination in solutions will be discussed, next.

##### 3.4. Selective , -NOE Difference Spectroscopy for and in Solutions

**1e** (G = H, Y = Cl) and **2e** (G = Y = Cl) were employed for the selective , -NOE difference spectroscopy. NMR spectra were measured for **1e** and **2e** under the completely decoupling mode, the off-resonance decoupling mode, and the selective , -NOE difference mode at the () frequency: The atom numbers are shown in Scheme 2. Figure 6 shows the NMR spectra for **2e**. Panels (a)â(c) of Figure 6 correspond to the selective , -NOE difference spectroscopy, off-resonance decoupling spectroscopy, and completely decoupling spectroscopy, respectively. As shown in Panel (a) of Figure 6, the selective irradiation at the (H_{2}) frequency of **2e** enhances exclusively the NMR signals of C_{2} and C_{9} of **2e**, relative to others. On the other hand, only NMR signal of C_{2} of **1e** is enhanced relative to others, when the (H_{2}) frequency of **1e** is selectively irradiated, although not shown. The results must be the reflection of the expectation that H_{2} is very close to C_{9} in **2e** to arise the nuclear interaction resulting in the NOE enhancement, whereas such interaction does not appear between H_{2} and C_{9} in **1e** due to the long distance between them. Namely, structures of **1e** and **2e** are demonstrated to be **A** and **B**, respectively, in solutions on the basis of the homonuclear NOE difference spectroscopy. The structure of **3e** must also **B** in solutions on the analogy of the case in **2e**. The results strongly support above conclusion derived from the () values of **1**â**3**.

**(a)**

**(b)**

**(c)**

#### 4. Conclusions

The behavior of ethynylchalcogenyl groups is examined as the factor to control fine structures. Fine structures of 8-G-1-(*p*-) [**1** (G = H) and** 2** (G = Cl): Y = H (**a**), OMe (**b**), Me (**c**), F (**d**), Cl (**e**), CN (**f**), and (**g**)] are determined by the X-ray crystallographic analysis. Structures are (**A**: **pd**) or (**A**: **np**) for **1a**â**c** bearing Y of nonacceptors, it is (**B**: **pd**) for **1e** with Y = Cl, and they are (**B**: **pl**) for **1f** and **1g** having Y of strong acceptors of CN and . The Y-dependence observed in **1** is just the opposite to the case of 1-(*p*-Se) (**4**). The factor to control the fine structures of **1** is called â*Ethynyl Influence.*â The structures are determined by the X-ray crystallographic analysis for **2b**, **2e**, and **2g**. The structures are all **B** around the Seâ bonds, in our definition. The structures around the Seâ bonds are **pd** for **2b** and **2e** and **pl** for **2g**. The **1b** (**A**: **pd**) structure with Y = OMe changes dramatically to **2b** (**B**: **pd**) by G = Cl at the 8-position in **2**. The effect is called G-dependence. The G-dependence must arise from the energy lowering effect of the (Cl)(Seâ) 3câ4e interaction. The (Cl)(Nap)(Se)(C*âĄ*C) interaction may also contribute to stabilize the structure. The structures of **1**, **2**, and** 3** (G = Br) are also examined in solutions based on the NMR parameters for (**A**: **pl**) of 9-(arylselanyl)anthracenes (**7**) and (**B**: **pd**) of 1-(arylselanyl)anthraquinones (**8**). The results show that **2** and **3** behave very similarly in solutions, and the structures of **2** and **3** are predominantly **B** in solutions with some equilibrium between **pd** and **pl** for the aryl groups. The selective , -NOE difference spectroscopic measurements strongly support that the structures are **A** for **1** and **B** for **2** and **3** in solutions derived from the () values of **1**â**3**.

#### Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (nos. 16550038, 19550041, and 20550042) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan. The authors are grateful to Professor Norihiro Tokitoh and Dr. Takahiro Sasamori, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, for the X-ray analysis.

#### References

- W. Nakanishi, âHypervalent chalcogen compounds,â in
*Handbook of Chalcogen Chemistry: New Perspectives in Sulfur, Selenium and Tellurium*, F. A. Devillanova, Ed., chapter 10.3, Royal Society of Chemistry, London, UK, 2006. View at: Google Scholar - W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, and S. Toyota, âStructure of bis(8-(phenylselanyl)naphthyl)diselenide: first linear alignment of four Se atoms as a four-centre six-electron bond,â
*Chemical Communications*, no. 3, pp. 371â372, 1996. View at: Google Scholar - W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, and H. Yamaguchi,
*Chemistry Letters*, no. 25, pp. 947â948, 1996. - W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, and S. Toyota, âFour-center six-electron interaction versus lone pair-lone pair interaction between selenium atoms in naphthalene peri positions,â
*Journal of Organic Chemistry*, vol. 63, no. 24, pp. 8790â8800, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - S. Hayashi and W. Nakanishi, âNovel substituent effect on ${}^{77}\text{S}\text{e}$ NMR chemical shifts caused by 4câ6e versus 2câ4e and 3câ4e in naphthalene peri positions: spectroscopic and theoretical study,â
*Journal of Organic Chemistry*, vol. 64, no. 18, pp. 6688â6696, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, and T. Arai, âLinear alignment of four sulfur atoms in bis[(8-phenylthio)naphthyl] disulfide: contribution of linear ${\text{S}}_{4}$ hypervalent four-centre six-electron bond to the structure,â
*Chemical Communications*, no. 20, pp. 2416â2417, 2002. View at: Google Scholar - W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, and N. Itoh, âFirst linear alignment of five Câ$\text{Se}\xe2\x8b\u017b\text{O}\xe2\x8b\u017b$SeâC atoms in anthraquinone and 9-(methoxy)anthracene bearing phenylselanyl groups at 1,8-positions,â
*Chemical Communications*, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 124â125, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, and N. Itoh, âExtend hypervalent 5câ6e interactions: linear alignment of five Câ$\text{Se}\xe2\x8b\u017b\text{O}\xe2\x8b\u017b$SeâC atoms in anthraquinone and 9-methoxyanthracene bearing arylselanyl groups at the 1,8-positions,â
*Journal of Organic Chemistry*, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 1676â1684, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, T. Furuta et al., âExtended hypervalent 5câ6e interactions: linear alignment of five Câ$\text{Z}?\text{O}?\text{Z}$âC (Z = S, Se) atoms in anthraquinone and anthracene systems,â
*Phosphorus, Sulfur and Silicon and the Related Elements*, vol. 180, no. 5-6, pp. 1351â1355, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - W. Nakanishi, T. Nakamoto, S. Hayashi, T. Sasamori, and N. Tokitoh, âAtoms-in-molecules analysis of extended hypervalent five-center, six-electron (5câ6e) ${\text{C}}_{2}{\text{Z}}_{2}$O interactions at the 1,8,9-positions of anthraquinone and 9-methoxyanthracene systems,â
*Chemistry*, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 255â268, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, S. Yamaguchi, and K. Tamao, âFirst ${\text{Br}}_{4}$ four centre-six electron and ${\text{Se}}_{2}{\text{Br}}_{5}$ seven centre-ten electron bonds in nonionic bromine adducts of selenanthrene,â
*Chemical Communications*, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 140â141, 2004. View at: Google Scholar - G. C. Pimentel, âThe bonding of trihalide and bifluoride ions by the molecular orbital method,â
*The Journal of Chemical Physics*, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 446â448, 1951. View at: Google Scholar - J. I. Musher, âThe chemistry of hypervalent molecules,â
*Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English*, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 54â68, 1969. View at: Google Scholar - K.-Y. Akiba, Ed.,
*Chemistry of Hypervalent Compounds*, Wiley-VCH, New York, NY, USA, 1999. - W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, and T. Uehara, âSuccessive change in conformation caused by $p$-Y groups in 1-(MeSe)-8-(
*p*-${\text{YC}}_{6}{\text{H}}_{4}$Se)${\text{C}}_{10}{\text{H}}_{6}$: role of linear $\text{Se}\xe2\x8b\u017b\text{Se}$âC three-center-four-electron versus n(Se)$\xe2\x8b\u017b$n(Se) two-center-four-electron nonbonded interactions,â*Journal of Physical Chemistry A*, vol. 103, no. 48, pp. 9906â9912, 1999. View at: Google Scholar - W. Nakanishi and S. Hayashi, âStructure of 1-(arylselanyl)naphthalenes. 2. G dependence in 8-G-1-(
*p*-${\text{YC}}_{6}{\text{H}}_{4}$Se)${\text{C}}_{10}{\text{H}}_{6}$,â*Journal of Organic Chemistry*, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 38â48, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - R. A. Hayes and J. C. Martin, âSulfurane chemistry,â in
*Organic Sulfur Chemistry: Theoretical and Experimental Advances*, F. Bernardi, I. G. Csizmadia, and A. Mangini, Eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1985. View at: Google Scholar - W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, A. Sakaue, G. Ono, and Y. Kawada, âAttractive interaction caused by the linear $\text{F}\xe2\x8b\u017b\text{Se}$âC alignment in naphthalene peri positions,â
*Journal of the American Chemical Society*, vol. 120, no. 15, pp. 3635â3640, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - S. Scheiner, Ed.,
*Molecular Interactions. From van der Waals to Strongly Bound Complexes*, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1997. - K.-D. Asmus, âStabilization of oxidized sulfur centers in organic sulfides. Radical cations and odd-electron sulfur-sulfur bonds,â
*Accounts of Chemical Research*, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 436â442, 1979. View at: Google Scholar - W. K. Musker, âChemistry of aliphatic thioether cation radicals and dications,â
*Accounts of Chemical Research*, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 200â206, 1980. View at: Google Scholar - W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, and T. Uehara, âStructure of 1-(arylselanyl)naphthalenesâY dependence in 1-(
*p*-${\text{YC}}_{6}{\text{H}}_{4}$Se)${\text{C}}_{10}{\text{H}}_{7}$,â*European Journal of Organic Chemistry*, no. 20, pp. 3933â3943, 2001. View at: Google Scholar - S. Hayashi, H. Wada, T. Ueno, and W. Nakanishi, âStructures of 1-(arylseleninyl)naphthalenes: O, G, and Y dependences in 8-G-1-[
*p*-${\text{YC}}_{6}{\text{H}}_{4}$Se(O)]${\text{C}}_{10}{\text{H}}_{6}$,â*Journal of Organic Chemistry*, vol. 71, no. 15, pp. 5574â5585, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - A. Kucsman and I. Kapovits, âNonbonded sulfur-oxygen interaction,â in
*Organic Sulfur Chemistry: Theoretical and Experimental Advances*, F. Bernardi, I. G. Csizmadia, and A. Mangini, Eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1985. View at: Google Scholar - R. S. Glass, S. W. Andruski, and J. L. Broeker, âGeometric effects in sulfur lone pair interactions,â in
*Reviews on Hetaroacom Chemistry*, S. Oae, Ed., vol. 1, pp. 31â45, MYU, Tokyo, Japan, 1988. View at: Google Scholar - R. S. Glass, S. W. Andruski, J. L. Broeker, H. Firouzabadi, L. K. Steffen, and G. S. Wilson, âSulfur-sulfur lone pair and sulfur-naphthalene interactions in naphtho[1,8-
*b,c*]-1,5-dithiocin,â*Journal of the American Chemical Society*, vol. 111, no. 11, pp. 4036â4045, 1989. View at: Google Scholar - R. S. Glass, L. Adamowicz, and J. L. Broeker, âTheoretical studies on transannular $\text{S}\xe2\x8b\u017b\text{S}$ interactions in geometrically constrained 1,5-dithiocane derivatives,â
*Journal of the American Chemical Society*, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 1065â1072, 1991. View at: Google Scholar - N. Furukawa, âStudies on dichalcogena dications of 2-center-2-electron and 3-center-4-electron bonds: isolation and intermediary formation,â
*Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan*, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 2571â2591, 1997. View at: Google Scholar - N. Furukawa, K. Kobayashi, and S. Sato, âTransannular and intermolecular interactions between chalcogen atoms: syntheses and properties of dichalcogena dications and trichalcogena hypervalent dications,â
*Journal of Organometallic Chemistry*, vol. 611, no. 1-2, pp. 116â126, 2000. View at: Google Scholar - W. Nakanishi, âFacile CâSe and CâS bond cleavages in diorganyl selenides and sulfides by iodine,â
*Chemistry Letters*, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2121â2122, 1993. View at: Google Scholar - M. Iwaoka, S. Takemoto, M. Okada, and S. Tomoda, âStatistical characterization of nonbonded $\text{S}\xe2\x8b\u017b\text{O}$ interactions in proteins,â
*Chemistry Letters*, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 132â133, 2001. View at: Google Scholar - M. Iwaoka, S. Takemoto, M. Okada, and S. Tomoda, âWeak nonbonded $\text{S}\xe2\x8b\u017b\text{X}$ (X = O, N, and S) interactions in proteins. statistical and theoretical studies,â
*Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japa*, vol. 75, no. 7, pp. 1611â1625, 2002. View at: Google Scholar - G. R. Desiraju, âSupramolecular synthons in crystal engineeringâa new organic synthesis,â
*Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English*, vol. 34, no. 21, pp. 2311â2327, 1995. View at: Google Scholar - V. Lippolis and F. Isaia, âCharge-transfer (C.-T.) adducts and related compound,â in
*Handbook of Chalcogen Chemistry: New Perspectives in Sulfur, Selenium and Tellurium*, F. A. Devillanova, Ed., chapter 8.2, Royal Society of Chemistry, London, UK, 2006. View at: Google Scholar - C. RĂȘthorĂȘ, M. FourmiguĂȘ, and N. Avarvari, âTetrathiafulvalene based phosphino-oxazolines: a new family of redox active chiral ligands,â
*Chemical Communications*, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1384â1385, 2004. View at: Google Scholar - C. RĂȘthorĂȘ, M. FourmiguĂȘ, and N. Avarvari, âTetrathiafulvalene-hydroxyamides and -oxazolines: hydrogen bonding, chirality, and a radical cation salt,â
*Tetrahedron*, vol. 61, no. 46, pp. 10935â10942, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - C. RĂȘthorĂȘ, N. Avarvari, E. Canadell, P. Auban-Senzier, and M. FourmiguĂ©, âChiral molecular metals: syntheses, structures, and properties of the ${{\text{ASF}}_{6}}^{\xe2\x88\x92}$ salts of racemic (Â±)-, (R)-, and (S)-tetrathiafulvalene-oxazoline derivatives,â
*Journal of the American Chemical Society*, vol. 127, no. 16, pp. 5748â5749, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - T. Suzuki, H. Fujii, Y. Yamashita et al., âClathrate formation and molecular recognition by novel chalcogen-cyano interactions in tetracyanoquinodimethanes fused with thiadiazole and selenadiazole rings,â
*Journal of the American Chemical Society*, vol. 114, no. 8, pp. 3034â3043, 1992. View at: Google Scholar - M. Turbiez, P. FrĂȘre, M. Allain, C. Videlot, J. Ackermann, and J. Roncali, âDesign of organic semiconductors: tuning the electronic properties of $\mathrm{\xcf\x80}$-conjugated oligothiophenes with the 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) building block,â
*Chemistry: A European Journal*, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 3742â3752, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - A. F. Cozzolino, I. Vargas-Baca, S. Mansour, and A. H. Mahmoudkhani, âThe nature of the supramolecular association of 1,2,5-chalcogenadiazoles,â
*Journal of the American Chemical Society*, vol. 127, no. 9, pp. 3184â3190, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - G. Mugesh, A. Panda, H. B. Singh, N. S. Punekar, and R. J. Butcher, âDiferrocenyl diselenides: excellent thiol peroxidase-like antioxidants,â
*Chemical Communications*, no. 20, pp. 2227â2228, 1998. View at: Google Scholar - G. Mugesh, A. Panda, H. B. Singh, N. S. Punekar, and R. J. Butcher, âGlutathione peroxidase-like antioxidant activity of diaryl diselenides: a mechanistic study,â
*Journal of the American Chemical Society*, vol. 123, no. 5, pp. 839â850, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - J. E. Drake, M. B. Hursthouse, M. Kulcsar, M. E. Light, and A. Silvestru, âHypervalent tellurium compounds containing Te-N interactions. Mononuclear and polynuclear derivatives,â
*Phosphorus, Sulfur and Silicon and Related Elements*, vol. 168-169, no. 1, pp. 293â296, 2001. View at: Google Scholar - J. E. Drake, M. B. Hursthouse, M. Kulcsar, M. E. Light, and A. Silvestru, âHypervalent tellurium compounds containing $\text{N}\xe2\x86\x92\text{Te}$ intramolecular interactions,â
*Journal of Organometallic Chemistry*, vol. 623, no. 1-2, pp. 153â160, 2001. View at: Google Scholar - G. Mugesh, A. Panda, S. Kumar, S. D. Apte, H. B. Singh, and R. J. Butcher, âIntramolecularly coordinated diorganyl ditellurides: thiol peroxidase-like antioxidants,â
*Organometallics*, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 884â892, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - J. R. Anacona, J. GĂłmez, and D. LoroĂ±o, âTwo polymorphs of bis(2-bromophenyl) disulfide,â
*Acta Crystallographica Section C*, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. o277âo280, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - G. Mugesh, H. B. Singh, and R. J. Butcher, âSynthesis and structural characterization of monomeric zinc(II), cadmium(II), and mercury(II) arenethiolates with a chelating oxazoline ligand,â
*European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry*, no. 8, pp. 1229â1236, 1999. View at: Google Scholar - G. Mugesh, H. B. Singh, and R. J. Butcher, âSynthesis and characterization of monomeric tellurolato complexes of zinc and cadmium: crystal and molecular structure of bis[2-(4,4-dimethyl-2-oxazolinyl)phenyl]ditelluride,â
*Journal of Organometallic Chemistry*, vol. 577, no. 2, pp. 243â248, 1999. View at: Google Scholar - D. Shimizu, N. Takeda, and N. Tokitoh, âUnusual carbon-sulfur bond cleavage in the reaction of a new type of bulky hexathioether with a zerovalent palladium complex,â
*Chemical Communications*, no. 2, pp. 177â179, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, S. Morinaka, T. Sasamori, and N. Tokitoh, âExtended hypervalent ${\text{E}}^{\xe2\x80\u010c}\xe2\x8b\u017b\text{E}$â$\text{E}\xe2\x8b\u017b{\text{E}}^{\xe2\x80\u010c}$ 4câ6e (E, ${\text{E}}^{\xe2\x80\u010c}=\text{Se}$, S) interactions: structure, stability and reactivity of 1-(8-$\text{P}\text{h}{\text{E}}^{\xe2\x80\u010c}{\text{C}}_{10}{\text{H}}_{6}$)EE(${\text{C}}_{10}{\text{H}}_{6}{\text{E}}^{\xe2\x80\u010c}\text{Ph-}{8}^{\xe2\x80\u010c}$)-${1}^{\xe2\x80\u010c}$,â
*New Journal of Chemistry*, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1881â1889, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - P. J. Stang and F. Diederich, Eds.,
*Modern Acetylenic Chemistry*, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1995. - F. Diederich, P. J. Stang, and R. R. Tykwinski, Eds.,
*Acetylene Chemistry: Chemistry, Biology, and Material Science*, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2005. - A. J. Zucchero, J. N. Wilson, and U. H. F. Bunz, âCruciforms as functional fluorophores: response to protons and selected metal ions,â
*Journal of the American Chemical Society*, vol. 128, no. 36, pp. 11872â11881, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - E. L. Spitler, L. D. Shirtcliff, and M. M. Haley, âSystematic structure-property investigations and ion-sensing studies of pyridine-derivatized donor/acceptor tetrakis(arylethynyl)benzenes,â
*Journal of Organic Chemistry*, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 86â96, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - H. Hinrichs, A. J. Boydston, P. G. Jones et al., âPhane properties of [2.2]paracyclophane/dehydrobenzoannulene hybrids,â
*Chemistry: A European Journal*, vol. 12, no. 27, pp. 7103â7115, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - J. A. Marsden and M. M. Haley, âCarbon networks based on dehydrobenzoannulenes. 5. Extension of two-dimensional conjugation in graphdiyne nanoarchitectures,â
*Journal of Organic Chemistry*, vol. 70, no. 25, pp. 10213â10226, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - Y. Jiang, D. Perahia, Y. Wang, and U. H. F. Bunz, âSide chain vs main chain. Who dominates? A polyester-grafted poly(
*p*-phenyleneethynylene) with two different morphologies,â*Macromolecules*, vol. 39, no. 15, pp. 4941â4944, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - K. Tahara, S. Furukawa, H. Uji-i et al., âTwo-dimensional porous molecular networks of dehydrobenzo[12]annulene derivatives via alkyl chain interdigitation,â
*Journal of the American Chemical Society*, vol. 128, no. 51, pp. 16613â16625, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - A. Nomoto, M. Sonoda, Y. Yamaguchi, T. Ichikawa, K. Hirose, and Y. Tobe, âA clue to elusive macrocycles: unusually facile, spontaneous polymerization of a hexagonal diethynylbenzene macrocycle,â
*Journal of Organic Chemistry*, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 401â404, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - E. E. Nesterov, Z. Zhu, and T. M. Swager, âConjugation enhancement of intramolecular exciton migration in poly(p-phenylene ethynylene)s,â
*Journal of the American Chemical Society*, vol. 127, no. 28, pp. 10083â10088, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - A. Orita, T. Nakano, D. L. An, K. Tanikawa, K. Wakamatsu, and J. Otera, âMetal-assisted assembly of pyridine-containing arylene ethynylene strands to enantiopure double helicates,â
*Journal of the American Chemical Society*, vol. 126, no. 33, pp. 10389â10396, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - A. Orita, D. L. An, T. Nakano, J. Yaruva, N. Ma, and J. Otera, âSulfoximine version of double elimination protocol for synthesis of chiral acetylenic cyclophanes,â
*Chemistry: A European Journal*, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 2005â2010, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - D. B. Werz and R. Gleiter, âPolyalkynes capped by sulfur and selenium,â
*Journal of Organic Chemistry*, vol. 68, no. 24, pp. 9400â9405, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - S. Husebye, E. A. Meyers, R. A. Zingaro, A. L. Braga, J. V. Comasseto, and N. Petragnani, âThe structure of triphenyl[$\mathrm{\xce\pm}$-(phenylseleno)phenacylidene]phosphorane,â
*Acta Crystallographica Section C*, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 90â94, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - P. C. Bell, W. Skranc, X. Formosa, J. O'Leary, and J. D. Wallis, âInteractions between alkynes and methoxy or dimethylamino groups in peri-naphthalene systems,â
*Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2*, no. 5, pp. 878â886, 2002. View at: Google Scholar - K. Yamane, S. Hayashi, W. Nakanishi, T. Sasamori, and N. Tokitoh, âFine structures of 1-(arylethynylselanyl)naphthalenes: characteristic features brought by the ethynylselanyl group,â
*Polyhedron*, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 2478â2486, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - K. Yamane, S. Hayashi, W. Nakanishi, T. Sasamori, and N. Tokitoh, âFine structures of 8-G-1-(arylethynylselanyl)naphthalenes (G = H, Cl, Br): factors to control the linear alignment of five $\text{G}\xe2\x8b\u017b\text{Se\xe2\x80\x93C}$$\xe2\x89\u0104$Câ${\text{C}}_{\text{Ar}}$ atoms in crystals and the behavior in solution,â
*Polyhedron*, vol. 27, no. 18, pp. 3557â3566, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - W. Nakanishi and S. Hayashi, âOn the factors to determine ${}^{77}\text{S}\text{e}$
NMR chemical shifts of organic selenium compounds: application of GIAO magnetic schielding tensor to the ${}^{77}\text{S}\text{e}$ NMR spectroscopy,â
*Chemistry Letters*, no. 6, pp. 523â524, 1998. View at: Google Scholar - A. Altomare, M. C. Burla, M. Camalli et al., âSIR97: a new tool for crystal structure determination and refinement,â
*Journal of Applied Crystallography*, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 115â119, 1999. View at: Google Scholar - G. M. Sheldrick,
*SHELXS 97, Program for Solving Crystal Structures*, University of GĂ¶ttingen, GĂ¶ttingen, Germany, 1997. - M. C. Burla, R. Caliandro, M. Camalli et al., âSIR2004: an improved tool for crystal structure determination and refinement,â
*Journal of Applied Crystallography*, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 381â388, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - G. M. Sheldrick,
*SHELXL 97, Program for Structure Refinement*, University of GĂ¶ttingen, GĂ¶ttingen, Germany, 1997. - W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, D. Shimizu, and M. Hada, âOrientational effect of aryl groups on ${}^{77}\text{S}\text{e}$ NMR chemical shifts: experimental and theoretical investigations,â
*Chemistry: A European Journal*, vol. 12, no. 14, pp. 3829â3846, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - S. Hayashi, K. Yamane, and W. Nakanishi, âOrientational effect of aryl groups in aryl selenides: how can ${}^{1}\text{H}$ and ${}^{13}\text{C}$ NMR chemical shifts clarify the effect?â
*Journal of Organic Chemistry*, vol. 72, no. 20, pp. 7587â7596, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

#### Copyright

Copyright © 2009 Satoko Hayashi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.