Nanomaterials for Remediation of Environmental Pollutants

Roy, Arpita; Sharma, Apoorva; Yadav, Saanya; Jule, Leta Tesfaye; Krishnaraj, Ramaswamy

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1764647

Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications of Bioinorganic-Based Nanomaterials for Environmental Pollution Hazards

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 1764647 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1764647

Nanomaterials for Remediation of Environmental Pollutants

Arpita Roy,¹Apoorva Sharma,²Saanya Yadav,²Leta Tesfaye Jule,^3,4and Ramaswamy Krishnaraj^3,5

Academic Editor: Wilson Aruni

Received11 Oct 2021

Revised11 Dec 2021

Accepted14 Dec 2021

Published28 Dec 2021

Abstract

Today, environmental contamination is a big concern for both developing and developed countries. The primary sources of contamination of land, water, and air are extensive industrialization and intense agricultural activities. Various traditional methods are available for the treatment of different pollutants in the environment, but all have some limitations. Due to this, an alternative method is required which is effective and less toxic and provides better outcomes. Nanomaterials have attracted a lot of interest in terms of environmental remediation. Because of their huge surface area and related high reactivity, nanomaterials perform better in environmental clean-up than other conventional approaches. They can be modified for specific uses to provide novel features. Due to the large surface-area-to-volume ratio and the presence of a larger number of reactive sites, nanoscale materials can be extremely reactive. These characteristics allow for higher interaction with contaminants, leading to a quick reduction of contaminant concentration. In the present review, an overview of different nanomaterials that are potential in the remediation of environmental pollutants has been discussed.

1. Introduction

The world is on the edge of a major environmental calamity that will cost us our fortune. The current state of the present environment is forever deteriorating. Environmental issues are piling up across the globe, and we have to behave as in an emergency on our planet. We have to gain a new perspective and approach calamities beforehand with new concepts and strategies and with our full awareness and seriousness. Pollution in nature, such as in air, water, and soil, undergoes millions of years to eradicate. Industry and automobile exhaust emissions are the main contributing factors for most of the environmental pollution [1].

Air pollutants like NO(x), SO₂, highly reactive and toxic organic compounds, POPs like dioxins, and PAH (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) are all hazardous for mankind [2]. When inhaled in high quantities, carbon monoxide (CO) can harm by immediate poisoning. When certain heavy metals such as Pb are taken into a living organism, they can vandalize by either immediate poisoning or chronic poisoning, depending on the different levels of exposure [3].

Pulmonary issues such as COPD, asthma, and bronchiolitis, cancers, heart diseases, CNS dysfunctions, and skin disorders are among the ailments caused by the aforementioned chemicals [4]. For ages, methods like condensation, flocculation, froth floatation, sand filtration, and AC adsorption are being widely used. However, these have their own limitations, such as inefficiency in scarping metal ions, high-energy input, and production of nonreusable chemicals. To overcome these problems, nanotechnology seems like an emerging option [5].

Nanotechnology possesses a prospect to significantly bestow in the development of cleaner, greener technologies that have major environmental and health advantages [6]. Nanotechnology techniques are being investigated for their potential to provide solutions for pollution management and mitigation, as well as to improve the performance of traditional environmental clean-up methods [7]. Nanotechnology can help the environment by reducing energy uptake during the manufacturing and production pathways, allowing products to get recycled after their usage, and developing and using environmentally friendly materials [8]. Nanotechnology presently holds great promise for addressing sustainability issues, but at the same time, we should also take into account the harm to the environment and human health [9]. Therefore, in this review, the importance of various nanomaterials that are capable of removing pollutants has been discussed.

2. Different Types of Pollutants

Pollutants are particles that cause damage to the environment by polluting them. When exposed to these pollutants, life can be damaged, and consequences on humans and other organisms are well recognized. Pollutants can get into the environment in a number of different ways, both naturally and through humankind [10]. The different kinds of pollutants include dyes, heavy metals, pesticides, and poly aromatic hydrocarbons. (Figure 1).

2.1. Dyes

Dyes are a type of synthetic organic chemical that is used in a variety of industries, including textiles. As a result, during their manufacture and later during fabric dyeing, they have become frequent industrial environmental contaminants [11]. Synthetic dyes in textile wastewater decrease light penetration into rivers, altering the photosynthetic efficiency of aquatic vegetation and, as a result, the food supply of aquatic creatures. The thin coating of released dyes that might build on the receiving waters’ surfaces reduces the quantity of dissolved oxygen, which has a serious impact on aquatic life. Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) is increased by dye-containing industrial effluents. Dyes are basically persistent organic pollutants (POPs) that exist in the environment, and it has been a concern that these man-made chemicals are xenobiotic [12]. Dyes like Azure-B if introduced can affect the helical structure of an organism’s DNA and duplex RNA. Disperse Red 1 and Disperse Orange 1 dyes are mutagenic in nature. Dyes such as Sudan I Dye (now banned), Basic Red 9 Dye, and Crystal Violet dye (induces tumor in fish) are carcinogenic in nature [13].

2.2. Heavy Metals

Heavy metal pollution is becoming more of an issue and a source of concern owing to the negative consequences it is causing all over the world [14]. Because of the rapidly increasing agriculture and metallurgy industries, inappropriate waste management, fertilizers, and pesticides, these come under inorganic pollutants and are being dumped in our waterways, land (soil), and the air (environment). Some of the most common heavy metals causing pollution are titanium (Ti)), iron (Fe), vanadium (V), chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), arsenic (As), molybdenum (Mo), nickel (Ni), cadmium (Cd), silver (Ag), tin (Sn), platinum (Pt), gold (Au), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb) [14]. Heavy metals are classified as such because of their high gram atomic weight or higher densities. Heavy metals are now used to refer to poisonous synthetic metallic atoms or molecules and metalloids that are harmful to the environment and humans [15]. These toxic heavy metals are naturally available on the Earth’s surface in their native state. The massive growth in their usage has resulted in an imminent influx of these metallic compounds in both the land and water natural resources. Heavy metal pollution has become an important component of anthropogenic activity, primarily due to metal mining, steelmaking, activities such as foundries and other metal-dependent industries, as well as metal leaching for extraction from various sources such as dumped landfills, excretion, domesticated poultry and chicken manure fertilizers, water runoffs, automobile industry, and road repair [16].

2.3. Pesticides

Pesticides are employed in agriculture for decades to safeguard crops and animals against insect infestations and to prevent the decrease in production. Pesticides are chemicals that are used to destroy unwanted organisms in gardens, agricultural farms, and other public locations. Pesticides, despite their use, may represent a threat to food safety, the environment, and all living things [17]. According to a survey conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO), around 1 million people are acutely poisoned as a result of pesticide exposure. Pesticides have a role in a variety of organic micropollutants with harmful environmental consequences. Biomagnification and bioconcentration are the two primary pollution processes [18]. Major interactions (receptor) in the human body for many pesticides are adipose fat tissue, causing these toxins to gather in lipids. DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) is an example of such a pesticide. If any human ingests any aquatic animal that has taken DDT with any food, it accumulates in the human body as DDT is lipophilic and dissolves in adipose tissues [19]. Inhibition or inability to reproduce, hormonal system disturbances, suppression of the immune system, animal and fish tumors death, malignancies, effects on intergenerational impacts of teratogens, DNA, cell damage, and significant muck on fish gills and crusts, indicative of poor fish health, and other physiological impacts including the weakening of the eggshell are some of the problems caused by pesticides pollutants [20].

2.4. Poly Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Due to their toxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic potential, poly aromatic hydrocarbons are a category of persistent and widespread environmental contaminants that are also hazardous to people. With the rise in demand for petroleum goods, their emissions have grown. Contributors include combustion in lack of oxygen of organic products, for example, coal and firewood [21]. Thermally, poly aromatic hydrocarbons are extremely stable and resistant to decomposition. The melting and boiling temperatures of these aromatic compounds are quite high. Poly aromatic hydrocarbons with a lower molecular weight are typically water soluble, but their hydrophobicity and aqueous insolubility increase with each additional ring [22]. The US Environmental Protection Agency has identified naphthalene, phenanthrene (C₄H₁₀), anthracene (C₆H₄CH)₂, fluoranthene (C₁₆H₁₀), pyrene (C₁₆H₁₀), chrysene (C₁₈H₁₂), benzo anthracene (C₁₈H₁₂), and benzo fluoranthene (C₂₀H₁₂) as pollutants that need to be kept in low concentration by constant monitoring.

3. Environmental and Health Consequences of Pollutants

Trace pollutants have been detected and analyzed during the recent decades with the establishment of refined techniques. However, subsequently with that emerging environmental concerns are to be reasoned with. The toxicological information regarding the majority of chemicals used is incomplete; long-term usage information or low-level exposure still lacks making the environmental challenges hidden. The path for identification of various sustainable as well as long-lasting techniques to counterattack the challenges of new emerging and identified pollutants with a detailed study of their consequences will be fruitful for human generations.

3.1. Environmental Consequences

3.1.1. Aquatic

One of the largest sources of aquatic pollution by environmental pollutants is Cultural Eutrophication. The increased rate of food production and population size has resulted in the discharge of nitrogen and phosphorus-rich compounds in water bodies [23]. This in turn has led to the expansion of harmful algal blooms toxic to the native aquatic plant and animal species and dysregulation of the biogeochemical cycle of persistently present organic pollutants in the natural environment [24]. Eutrophication has undesirably caused restriction of water use by fisheries, industries, and consumption as potable water because of decreased oxygen percentages and high ratios of poisonous compounds [25]. Another problem characterized by persistent organic pollutants is biomagnification, that is, the accumulation of poorly metabolizable, moderate to highly hydrophobic substances that are circulated in food webs [26]. The major effect caused due to these is a significant reduction in the numbers of biologically important local and native species which play an important role in the ecosystem.

The anthropogenic pollutants have threatened marine integrity; elevated carbon dioxide and trace metal levels have caused the imbalance of acid base homeostasis in organisms, thereby affecting their chance of survival and performance often also called Ocean Acidification [27]. It has caused an untimely calcification of coral reefs, microorganisms like zooplanktons, and shellfishes [28]. The aquatic toxicology reveals the presence of mixed toxicities including heavy metals [29] and persistent organic pollutants (POPs), including perfluoro alkylated acids (PFAS) worldwide [30]. Water is one of the most vulnerable and essential components of the environment and its pollution is a matter of great concern [31].

3.1.2. Terrestrial

The major contributors to environmental pollution are industries. The unauthorized dumping of pollutants such as aromatic hydrocarbons, plasticizers, and various xenobiotic compounds is a threat to the terrestrial ecosystem [32]. They are holders of mutagenic and carcinogenic properties and have decreased agricultural land production due to the accumulation of toxic compounds that have an impact on seed dormancy. The increased pollutant levels in the terrestrial domain by municipal sewage and extensive farm fertilization have led to the vulnerable quality of ground water by leaching of pollutants like heavy metals (zinc, cadmium, lead), chemical pesticides, fertilizers, and other micropollutants [33]. Nutrient secretion in land areas can lead to water nutrient enrichment through processes like eutrophication. Recent instances show the increasing risk of forest fires in zones contaminated with radioactive pollutants [34]. Increased deforestation due to various pollutants has directly or indirectly affected the increasing soil erosion rates and has displaced sediments and nutrient-rich soil surface causing loose soil [35] and thus promoting the events of flash floods.

3.1.3. Aerial

Air pollution is a threat to the whole human civilization and is the sixth leading cause of death in the world. Aerial pollutants like carbon dioxide, fuel soot particles, methane, halocarbons, ozone, and nitrous oxides have contributed to causing one of the biggest environmental challenges, i.e., global warming [36]. Global warming leads to ocean acidity, increased sea levels due to melting glaciers and snow, enhanced tropical calamities such as storms, loss of viable agricultural grounds and animal habitats, and dysregulated water supply [37]. Some pollutants like nitrogenous and sulfur oxides produced by combustion interact with the atmosphere and result in acid deposition in the form of rain, fog, or snow. It is known to destroy the stability of the ecosystem, threaten food reserves, and can be speculated to cause a socioeconomic implication at a larger level socioeconomic implication [38]. The levels of air pollutants are increasing substantially in urban and periurban areas in developing countries like India. They in turn have affected the adjacent agricultural areas and have caused a threat to the crop production rates [39]. High particulate matter concentration can cause emission changes and physical, chemical changes in the atmosphere. The emissions of volatile organic compounds will be altered in the near future, which may further impact secondary organic aerosols [40].

3.2. Health Consequences

Air pollutants like oxides, particulate matter, and ground-level ozone are one of the most common health threats. Oxides such as CO (carbon monoxide) decrease oxygen delivery to body organs, impair vision, and at extreme concentrations are fatal. Sulfur oxides have been reported to be carcinogenic in nature if exposed for a long duration [41]. These pollutants have contributed significantly to problems such as cough, increased difficulty in breathing /decreased lung function, irritation in respiratory pathways, triggering asthma, and inflammation of bronchi and bronchioles. Besides adults, children also have been adversely affected; there have been increased cases of infant mortality, perinatal effects, allergy, cardiovascular and mental disorders, endothelial dysfunction, among them [42].

Traffic-Related Air Pollution. A mixture class of air pollutants can contribute to the generation of reactive oxygen species, creating an imbalance in free radical concentration that causes oxidative stress and initiates a risk of cancer development [43]. Increased oxidative stress and poor cardiovascular circulation cause inflammation in organs, which can cause mental health problems. Nitrogenous oxides and particulate fine and ultrafine matter have the capability to cross the blood-brain barrier and reach the brain, thus modulating Vaso regulation and even triggering neural inflammation and thus being a stepping stone for future neural dysregulations [44].

New pollutants are emerging and entering aquatic bodies: pesticides, chemically synthesized fertilizers, compounds such as dyes, detergents, and heavy metals have the potential to affect human health [45]. Eutrophic waters can cause skin-eye irritation, gastric inflammation, and vomiting in individuals. If high nitrogen levels are persistent, they may be a risk to infants <6 months of age, causing Blue Baby syndrome (decrease in the oxygen-carrying capacity of hemoglobin) [46]. Major pollutants even observed in drinking water, such as heavy metals—arsenic, lead, mercury, phthalates—have endocrine-disrupting properties. They can mimic, block, or interfere with the action of hormones present in the human body producing neurological or reproductive adverse developments. PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), another type of pollutant, has been linked with infertility, thyroid dysfunction, cancer, and obesity [47]. Contaminants are known to cause problems like diarrhea, cholera, typhoid, malaria, and other congenital problems [48].

4. Traditional Methods of Removing Pollutants and Their Side Effects

Traditional methods like coagulation, adsorption, and advanced oxidation processes combined with electrochemical and biological processes (Table 1) have been used before the revealment of nanobiotechnology.

Coagulation and flocculation are traditional methods for the treatment of polluted water. They are used as a pretreatment of biological treatment, improving the biodegradability of waste and removing macropollutants [58]. Compounds like ferric chloride and polymers are added which destabilize the colloidal materials and small particles to agglomerate in large flocs that are settleable. It is a physiochemical approach to treat metal pollutants in industrial wastewater and remove soluble compounds by forming flocs [59]. It also aids in the elimination of suspended solids (SS) and organic material. Coagulation accompanied by ozonation has been used for waste sanitary landfill leachates [60]. The coagulation-flocculation process is also known to remove nutrient pollutants like P and nitrogen [61]. In comparison to this, adsorption is a surface phenomenon of organic as well as inorganic pollutant removal. It can be achieved through its subtypes like membrane adsorption where the contaminants are adsorbed to the membranes while the pollutant carrying source flows through it. Chromium(VI), zinc (II), and lead (II) are known to be successfully removed by polymer membrane-based adsorption methods and membrane-based adsorption methods, especially polypyrrole [62]. Activated carbon adsorption, as listed by the USEPA (Environmental Protection Agency), is one of the best control technologies for the removal of organic dyes and discharges from pharmaceutical companies [63]. Adsorption processes involving activated carbon have long been regarded as conventional treatment processes which can remove a multitude of pollutants [64]. Zeolite Adsorption. Natural zeolites known to exhibit high selectivity for heavy metals (cadmium, copper, zinc) and high abundance as compared to other chemicals synthesized for pollutant removal [64] have a high surface, large pores, thermally stable, cheap, chemically inert, and easily modified surface functional group that enables it to have excellent selectivity against pollutants [50]. Biosorption. Adsorbents are either prepared naturally or engineered artificially, giving them several advantages such as low cost, abundant raw material, high selectivity with regenerative ability, and performance comparable to conventional techniques. It can be used for the treatment of secondary and tertiary effluent pollutants [65].

Complete degradation of organic pollutants with mineralization can be achieved by advanced oxidation processes. Processes like ozonation, Fenton reaction, UV irradiation, peroxide handling, and their combination are being included in it. Polyphenols can be treated by Fenton and solar photo- Fentons. Photo-Fenton can also treat reoccurring organic compounds. AOP can aid in chemical oxygen demand and poly phenol removals up to 90 percent [66]. Pollutants such as toxic cyanide can be removed using a combination of NaClO and hydrogen peroxide forming singlet oxygen and hydroxide ions [67]. AOPs tend to produce highly biodegradable and less toxic products [54]. Photolysis, i.e., degradation by light (photons) combined with hydrogen peroxide, can be used for the degradation of pesticides with the assistance of solvents like trichloromethane and carbon tetrachloride [68, 69].

Heterogenous photocatalysis by semiconductors such as titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, ferric oxide, copper sulfide, and cadmium sulfide can be efficient in degrading the pollutants into biodegradable compounds with a less toxic footprint as well as inorganic and halide ions [51], with additional benefits of low cost, easily crystallizable forms, phytochemical stable nature, and nontoxic behavior [55]. Ozonation based on the oxidation and/or degradation of pesticides (belonging to the classes organochlorine, organophosphorus, and triazine) allows for high reductions in chemical oxygen demand and significant removal of aromatic compounds [70]. Electrochemical processes have been also used as traditional methods for pollutant removal. Electrocoagulation uses a metal sacrificial anode which doses water. It has advantages in providing cations without increasing the saline nature of the solution, is easily operatable, has rapid sedimentation rates, reduced sludge production, and has less amount of coagulant ions required for treatment [56, 71]. Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Processes have enabled the removal of pollutants and their complete mineralization with an environment-friendly approach. Extensive hydroxyl ions are produced even under optimal conditions of current and catalyst [72]. The current usage promises complete automation of the process on a large scale [49]. Electrokinetic remediation is a potential technique used for the separation and remediation of areas contaminated with organic and inorganic pollutants, for clean-up of low permeable matrices. It uses mechanisms like electromigration, electroosmosis, and electrophoresis combined with or without electrolysis [53, 73]. Electro Fenton is an electrochemical-based oxidation method [57]. The oxidation of organic compounds occurs via hydroxyl radical generated by electrochemical oxidation indirectly, and both hydrogen peroxide and ferrous ions can be electrogenerated under in situ conditions [74]. Electrochemical oxidation is a widely used popular technique for removing organic pollutants [75]. The oxidation is direct or indirect [76]. However, the direct oxidation process is in general not in use due to its ineffective nature in the degradation of organic pollutants, but its powerful oxidating agents produced could be used in indirect oxidation processes [57]. Biological methods have been adopted for pollutant removal due to their low cost and green nature [52]. They are widespread and conventional in nature, cost-effective, and well studied and can be modified according to the local needs [49]. They can be combined with other processes like wet air oxidation, ozonation for their increased efficiency, and better removal of pollutants that are toxic and refractory in nature [77].

5. Role of Nanotechnology and Nanomaterials for Remediation of Pollutants

Nanotechnology is a branch of science and engineering that is creating “materials” on the scale of atoms and molecules. Conventional principles of physical and chemical sciences do not apply to these sizes. The appearance, toughness, conductivity, and sensitivity of materials change drastically between the nano- and macroscales. For instance, carbon “nanotubes” are hundredfold stronger than steel, as well as sixfold lighter [78]. Various types of nanoparticles, their characterization mechanism, and how they can be applied in various sectors ranging from the health industry to the removal of environmental pollutants have been elucidated in this review.

For the elimination of environmental pollutants, the environmental remediation process employs a variety of methods (e.g., surface assimilation, absorption, synthetic reactions, catalysis using light, and filtering) [79]. Nanomaterials possess a high ratio of their surface-area-to-volume, frequently resulting in greater biogeological and chemical reactivity compared to other macroscale materials. Their improved characteristics and efficacy make them particularly appropriate for carrying out such operations [80]. Nanoscale materials are being used in a wide array of fields, including science, the environment, industry, and medicine.

Over the last few years, an increase in the number of nanoscale products with environmental remedial applications has been created and deployed. Nanomaterials, for example, have been utilized to clean up contaminated soil and groundwater at various hazardous waste sites like those damaged by chlorinated solvents or in oil spills. Manufactured nanoparticles have physicochemical, surface, and optical-electronic characteristics that answer issues that were previously difficult to tackle with traditional methods. It can design unique ways for creating new methodologies, replacing current tools, and producing new materials and chemicals with high performance and low energy usage [81].

6. Different Methods for Nanoparticle Synthesis

Science and innovations have made rapid advances in the production of nanomaterials to obtain unique characteristics that differ from those of bulk materials. Nanoparticles can be prepared by chemical, physical, and biological methods (Figure 2).

6.1. Chemical Methods

6.1.1. Using Polyols for Synthesis of Nanoparticles

Polyols have numerous hydroxyl groups attached to any organic compound. Nonaqueous liquid (in which the solvent is any other than water),falling under polyols is used as a solvent and reducing agent in this technique. The use of nonaqueous solvents in this technique has the benefit of reducing surface oxidation and assemblage [82]. If the synthesis is carried out at a somewhat elevated temperature with precise particle growth control, the polyol process can be used as a sol-gel technique in the production of oxide [83]. Oxide-based nanoparticles of vanadium, yttrium, manganese, cobalt, tin, lead, and titanium can be produced by this method. Because of its unique properties of high reducing ability and high boiling point, ethylene glycol is the most broadly adopted solvent in the polyol technique in metal oxide nanoparticles manufacturing [84]. Bimetallic alloys and core-shell nanoparticles can also be produced by this method [85].

6.1.2. Reduction in Solution (Colloidal Method)

The use of reducing agents such as Na₃C₆H₅O₇ is one of the most essential ways. Turkevich suggested this method for the first time for the manufacture of Au monodisperse colloidal solutions in 1951. This approach allows for the creation of spherical nanoparticles. Later, the same approach was utilized to make silver nanoparticles, and the spread of these particles was bigger, ranging from 60 to 200 nm. In this method, a metal salt gives nanoparticles as residues upon reduction in a liquid solution. This method is generally used for the synthesis of gold, iron, molybdenum, and silver nanoparticles. For gold, a solution of chloroauric acid is heated to a boil. Trisodium citrate is used as a reducing agent. After mixing and stirring for 10 mins, seed crystals changed to gold nanoparticles.

6.1.3. Electrochemical Synthesis

The capacity to precisely tune the chosen potential and the rejection of the potentially wasteful alternative half-reaction are the key advantages of this technology over a conventional chemical reaction [86]. The electrochemical production of Ag nanoparticles has received a lot of attention lately. The electrochemical process employed consisted of dissolving a metallic anode in an aprotic liquid [87]. Adding electrons to oxidize the positive electrode of the cell for solvable silver ions in acetonitrile containing tetra butyl ammonium yields Ag nanoparticles ranging in size from 2 to 7 nm. By adjusting the current density, the particle size can be determined. The electrochemical production of styrene-stabilized red luminous Si nanoparticles is also commercialized. Under UV stimulation, Si nanoparticles glow, which is useful in optics [88]. Platinum nanoparticles can also be synthesized by the electrochemical method. The desired Pt nanoparticles are deposited on the surface of the electrode with a size of about 10 nm [89].

6.2. Physical Methods

6.2.1. Plasma Method

Another approach for producing nanoparticles is the plasma process. Radiofrequency (RF) heating coils create the plasma. The first metal is placed in a pestle, which is then placed in an evacuated chamber. High-voltage RF coils are wrapped around the evacuated chamber; then, the metal is heated above its evaporation point [90]. Helium is the gas employed in the technique, which after flowing into the system generates a high-temperature plasma in the region of the coils. Metal vapor forms on helium gas atoms and diffuses up to a cold collecting rod, where nanoparticles are collected and passivated by oxygen gas [86].

6.2.2. Microwave Irradiation

There is the usage of microwaves to heat samples, which reduces reaction time and requires fewer materials. Furthermore, the use of microwaves allows for better control of reaction processes. The higher the effectiveness of nanoparticles with greater applicability, whether as ferrofluid, cell separation, or pollution removal, the closer they are to the spherical form and the more homogeneity between the forms [91]. Microwave-assisted irradiation can be used to make ZnS nanoparticles. XRD, SEM, and UV-Vis spectroscopy were used to analyze the generated ZnS nanoparticles. According to the XRD spectrum, the average size of the nanocrystallites was measured using the Debye-Scherrer formula, and they were determined to be around 6 nm [84].

6.2.3. Radiation Dependent

Gamma radiation is repeatable, can control particle shape, yields monodisperse metallic nanoparticles, is simple, is inexpensive, and uses fewer toxins as a precursor: it uses the fewest reagents, uses a reaction temperature close to room temperature with as few synthetic steps as possible, and minimizes the amount of generated by-products and waste [92]. The radiolytic reduction has been shown to be an effective method for producing monosized and widely distributed metallic clusters [93]. The excitation and ionization of the solvent are the major consequences of high-energy gamma rays interacting with a solution of metal ions [94].

6.3. Biological Method

Green synthesis is necessary to avoid the creation of undesired or hazardous by-products by developing dependable, long-term, and environmentally friendly manufacturing processes. To attain this aim, suitable solvent systems and natural resources are required. To accommodate diverse biological components, green production of metallic nanoparticles is being used.

6.3.1. Plant

Plant leaf extracts contain important elements to be used in the process of synthesis of nanoparticles. At various experimental parameters, the plant extract is combined with metal precursor solutions [95]. The parameters that determine the settings of plant leaf extracts are acknowledged to affect the pace of nanoparticle production, as well as the output and stability of the particles [96]. Flavones, terpenoids, sugars, ketones, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, and amides are the major phytochemicals involved in nanoparticle bioreduction [97]. The enol-to-keto-transformation regulates the generation of biogenic Ag nanoparticles in sweet basil extracts [98]. Sugars found in plant extracts, such as glucose and fructose, also have a role in the creation of metallic nanoparticles [99]. Plant extracts are biomolecules composed of carbohydrates and proteins that function as a reducing agent in the synthesis of metallic nanoparticles [100]. Geranium leaf extract contains terpenoids that actively participate in the conversion of Ag ions into nanoparticles [101]. Eugenol is a major terpenoid found in cinnamon extracts and is required for the bioreduction of the metal ions HAuCl₄ and AgNO₃ [102].

6.3.2. Bacteria

Commercial biotechnological applications such as environmental remediation, genetic manipulation, and biosorption have all made use of bacterial species [103]. Bacteria have the ability to decrease metal ions and are important candidates in the creation of nanoparticles [104]. Due to its economic potential and viability, green synthesis technology delivers a clean, nontoxic, and environmentally acceptable technique for the production of metallic nanoparticles [105]. Bacteria like Delftia acidovorans can synthesize pure Au nanoparticles [106]. Delftibactin is considered a nonribosomal peptide (NRP) that has been linked to the production of Au nanoparticles due to its ability to induce resistance to toxic Au ions. Due to the formation of inert gold nanoparticles bound to delftibactin, the transition metal gold had no toxicity toward bacteria [107]. Bacillus licheniformis is said to have produced Ag nanoparticles within its cells [108].

6.3.3. Fungi

Green synthesis of metal/metal-oxide nanomaterials by fungi is also a very rapid method. Because they include a range of enzymes, they are better green means for the synthesis of metal-based nanoparticles [109]. In comparison to bacteria, the competent fungus can generate greater volumes of nanoparticles [110]. Trichoderma reesei has an advantage over other fungi in that it is a well-studied organism that can be controlled to produce a large number of enzymes and may aid in increasing the rate of nanoparticle synthesis [111]. The fungus Neurospora crassa can be used in the biological manufacture of platinum nanoparticles. Single PtNPs with diameters ranging from 4 to 35 nm were generated intracellularly [112].

6.3.4. Algae

Heavy metals are thought to accumulate in algae, which could be used in the biogenic manufacture of metallic nanoparticles [113]. The dried unicellular alga Chlorella vulgaris could produce tetrahedral, decahedral, and icosahedral nanoparticles that aggregated near the surface. The proteins in the algal extract serve as a stabilizing agent, a reducing agent, and a shape-control modifier, among other things [114]. Sargassum wightii, a marine alga, has the ability to produce extracellular Ag and Au nanoparticles [115]. The gold nanoparticles created are of real yield since they are made from living Euglena gracilis microalga cells that have been cultivated under either mixotrophic or autotrophic conditions [116].

7. Types of Nanoparticles and Their Characterization Methods

Nanoparticles can be divided further into many subtypes according to broader categories like material type, dimensions, or 3D structure and origin.

7.1. Basis of Origin

Nanoparticles can be either natural in origin or engineering (synthetic). Natural nanoparticles are produced in nature by biological processes and organisms or induced by human activity [117]. Synthetic or engineered nanoparticles as their name describes are nanomaterials produced by mechanical processes, exhaustive mechanisms, or chemical, biological, and physical processes individually or in combination [118].

7.2. Basis of 3D Structure

On the basis of structure, they can be classified into three categories: one dimension, two dimensions, and three dimensions. In zero D, the electrons cannot move in any axis; i.e., they are dimensionless; in 1 D, they can move along a single axis followed on by 2 D and 3 D where they can move in two and three axes, respectively, which is irrespective of the axis combination [119]. One-dimension nanoparticles are thin films of sizes ranging from 1 to 100 nm. Two-dimension nanoparticles generally include nanotubes, e.g., carbon nanotubes. Three-dimension nanoparticles consist of dendrimers, quantum dots, and fullerenes (like carbon 60) [120].

7.3. Based on Material Type

Nanomaterials can be subclassified according to the material they are made of such as inorganic, organic, carbon-containing, or composite substances. Inorganic-based nanomaterials are made of metals or their oxides, e.g., gold, silver [121], titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, or silicon-based compounds, etc. [119]. Organic nanomaterials are obtained from organic matter excluding carbon-based or inorganic-based sources; they are present in forms like micelles, liposomes, and polymeric particles. Composite nanoparticles are multiphasic in nature such that one of their phases can combine with other similar or dissimilar nanoparticles in bulk, complex formations, e.g., a gold nanoparticle in composition with ceramic or a polymer. Carbon-based nanoparticles consist of fullerenes, nanotubes, and nanofibers found in generally two-dimensional morphological structures [122–124].

7.4. Characterization

Various techniques (Figure 3) have been used for characterization, including UV-visible spectroscopy, that is, based on the principle of surface plaque resonance (SPR) [125]. Another technique is X-ray diffraction (XRD) to determine the crystalline phase [126–128]. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy helps to identify the functional groups present in the sample. Characterization of nanoparticles based on size, morphology, and surface charge was performed using atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy [129–131]. Dynamic light scattering is used to measure nanoparticles size.

8. Different Application of Nanoparticles

The usage of nanoparticles/materials has shown tremendous growth worldwide from medical grafts to sensing tools. They have revolutionized how various techniques happen. Green synthesized particles especially silver nanoparticles have antibiotic activities; they have been used for medical implantations as silicone artificial heart valves, catheters, bone prosthetics, dental sets, and bandages [132]. The key ability of particles at the nanoscale has promoted the formation of biosensors for the easier diagnosis of diseases, checking the progression of the problem, as well as tracking the progress of the given therapy [133]. Green synthesized biodegradable nanoscale particles can have a sustained drug release for a long period of time without reporting the risk of infections [134]. Many studies have reported the multifactorial antimicrobial property of green nanoparticles. Generally, nanoparticles either function extracellularly or intracellularly to alter the bacterial growth rates such as inhibition of cytological transport and signaling [135]. Antibiotic activities of NP antifungal properties have also been reported. These particles can degrade cell walls and have been found to be as effective as 87% in studies with concentrations as low as 6 mg/ml [136].

Through the usage of gold nanoclusters and in vivo studies, carcinogenic cells were bioimaged with the help of fluorescent objects in cell lines such as hepatocarcinoma cell lines and leukemia cell lines. These nanoparticles are in clustered form with fluorescence activity [137]. Huang et al. created nanoparticles of carbon which were negligibly cytotoxic and highly biocompatible with hydrophilic nature and compatible nature. The blue photoluminescence cells were used to stain human HeLa cells and green fluoresced imaging [138]. Through recent advances in technology, antineoplastic traits of synthesized nanoparticles, which can have much lower side effects, have been the topic of research. These nanoparticles are very effective, provide a small amount of negative impact and target tumorigenic cell lines, and can also be used in combination with high-dose drugs to achieve the correct therapy [139]. Target therapies with a combination of anticarcinogenic nanomaterials use carriers like polymeric micelles, dendrimers, and liposomes. Inorganic metallic NM including metals and metal oxides is a promising approach for the future in cell imaging, using it as sensors, and drug delivery [140].

9. Nanomaterials in Remediation of Soil

Soil contamination and degradation continue to be a significant environmental problem, with remediation becoming a worldwide challenge. Degrading soil reservoirs throughout the world have a great influence on agricultural production and food safety; therefore, this needs to be addressed right away [141]. Heavy metals (remains that become toxins), herbicides, and POPs-persistent organic pollutants contaminate soil, adding to the issue. Because of biomagnification, soil contaminated with these chemicals provides an increased chance of intoxication of the food chain. Both the urgent production to feed more people and the difficulty of avoiding additional land deterioration have a significant impact on agricultural production [141]. The immobilization or adsorption procedure is one of the most commonly utilized treatment techniques. The effectiveness, low cost, and environmentally favorable approach for removing metal pollutants from soils are some of the most prominent benefits connected with this sort of remediation technology [142]. Carbon-based nanomaterials, for example, carbon nanotubes, oxides of metal (ferric oxide and titanium oxide), and various nanocomposites are some of the engineered nanomaterials that have been utilized to immobilize soil pollutants [143]. For example, ferric oxide nanoparticles have an extraordinary potential to absorb and immobilize heavy metals such as Cd and As from various media samples [144]. Oily sewage is an adverse problem affecting the aquatic local life [145]. Iron nanoparticles are successful in removal of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPHs) from water with enhanced results of 88.34% [146]. Thus, nanotechnology-based treatments are able to provide high-performance treated water which has less impurities and toxic substances combined with the removal of heavy metals. Nanoscience’s can be combined with biological treatments for reducing the hazards of environmental substances. Organic dyes can be efficiently decolorized through industrial mechanisms backboned by nanoparticles [147]. Gold and silver nanoparticles are very successful catalyst in dye degradation, the basic process being two stepped; first the accumulation of electrons on particle surface and second the diffusion of dye for a reduction reaction [148].

Magnetic nanoparticles have an extended range of use within adsorption and catalytic pollution treatment [149]. Polyacrylamide-modified magnetite nanomaterials can be used, as they provide soil erosion and arsenate leaching [150]. On-site immobilization of pollutants has received a lot of attention as a feasible and economical method of remediating polluted soils. Various NM-based full form modifications have been studied, to find a relevant apt material that takes into account low cost, high efficiency, better stability, least harmful environmental effect, and maximum reusability. By reducing the exchangeable percentage of metals in polluted sediments and soils, nanohydroxyapatite particles successfully immobilized metal concentrations in pore water [151]. This research stated that utilizing sodium carboxymethyl cellulose-stabilized nZVI, they were able to remove 80 percent of soil-bound Cr (VI). Redox-sensitive elements as pollutants can be treated by abiotic reductive reactions directly impacting their mobility and toxicity in soil alone or in combination with immobilization techniques. The addition of nZVI to pyrene-adulterated soil, for example, led to strong reducing conditions, allowing pyrene to be removed through reduction. Nanomaterials are also used in advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) that employ various oxidants for the breakdown of organic contaminants in polluted soil [152]. Highly reactive radicals (water radical, sulfur dioxide radical) can be generated by combining hydrogen peroxide or persulfate with soluble Fe (II) for the efficient oxidative breakdown of organic contaminants. However, acidic pH (which is necessary to avoid Fe (II) precipitation) and related drawbacks, such as the expense of early acidification and negative impacts on soil quality and microorganisms, restrict these activities. As a result, solid iron phases have been proposed instead of soluble Fe (II) to allow chemical oxidation without pH alteration. Iron particles when used with chelating ligands act as an enhancement in the process [153]. Green nanoparticles have a very large scope for providing solutions against environmental pollutants and provide scope for the treatment of localized environments contaminated with metal ions toxic in nature. These materials can be useful in remediation and cleaning waste sites. Ferrous NP can be applied for disinfection of heavy metal contaminated water as well as heavy metal-containing soil, additionally being effective eco-friendly fertilizers. These nanofertilizers can synchronize plant nutrient uptake while decreasing groundwater contamination as they are immobilized and will not change into permanent chemical or gaseous forms that are unattainable for the growing plant [154]. Magnetite (Fe₃O₄) andgreigite (Fe₃S₄) with siliceous material produced using bacteria have been used in optical coatings for solar energy applications [155].

10. Nanomaterials in Remediation of Water Pollution

Wastewater discharge from commercial and industrial factories, as well as untreated residential sludge and synthetic contaminants influx to aquatic resources, is extremely harmful to humans as well as for the ecosystem. Heavy metal ions, organic compounds, and oils are the primary water pollutants in this regard, and they can render any water stream unfit for consumption [156]. Through the advancement of nanotechnology, a wide spectrum of novel nanomaterial-based technologies has emerged. Nanomaterials, as adsorbent systems, have a huge surface area for reactions at a very smaller relative weight, are manufactured at a lower price than activated carbon, and can effectively withdraw contaminants. A wide array of nanomaterial-based adsorbents in various shapes and parameters like dimensionalities have been studied in this respect, including zero-dimensional nanoparticles, one-dimensional nanofibers and nanotubes, two-dimensional nanosheets, and three-dimensional nanoflowers [157]. In terms of composition, there is a lot of variety, and various carbon-based and noncarbon-based nanomaterials can assist in cleansing aquatic bodies. The segregation process depends on the contaminant’s chemical/physical interaction with the surface of the nanomaterial. Nanomaterials can also function as a major manufacturing component of the permeable segregator unit as a nanocomposite supreme filtration membrane, or as a thin film addition to enhancing the hydrophilicity and thermomechanical characteristics of the membrane [158]. Zinc and titanium oxides, ceramic, nanowire, and polymeric membranes, carbon nanotubes, and submicron particles are used in various remediation ways such as lysis, filtration, adsorption, and oxidation [159].

Dye pollutants are deadly because of their carcinogenic nature. Dyes have been used in textiles, paintings, pigments, and other products for thousands of years. Around 0.1 million different synthetic dyes are manufactured on an industrial level today. Talking about yearly usage, roughly 1.6 million tonnes of dyes are utilized. During usage, fifteen percent of the total is squandered [160]. Crocein orange G and acid green 25 adsorption capability is high in chitosan sugar-coated magnetite nanoparticles. A magnetic field, interestingly, could easily recover the adsorbent nanoparticles [161]. Fe₃O₄/activated carbon nanoparticles capable of separating 138 mg/g and 166.6 mg/g dyes (methylene blue and brilliant green) have been produced based on this idea [162]. In removing methylene blue dye from water, electrospun polyether sulfone nanofibers having vanadium nanoparticles are used. Because the nanofibers have a low isoelectric point, they develop a large, highly hydroxylated surface area in an alkaline medium, which promotes the adsorption of cationic methylene blue molecules [163]. Adsorption has the disadvantage of not being able to totally “eliminate” or “neutralize” dye contaminants. Instead, it collects and gathers dye constituents exclusively by moving them at different molecular phases. This functionality may be difficult to implement since the dye-based sewage is difficult to remove and is adsorbed on the rarely reused membrane [158]. A number of progressive oxidation processes that release hydroxyl radicals (O̊H) hold promise for the process of removing colors from textile effluents in this respect. Hydroxyl radical is highly reactive and oxidizes refractory organic contaminants due to its unpaired electrons. The increasing rate of photoreaction, which is photocatalysis, has become one of the most investigated advanced oxidative remediation methods and is regarded as a realistic destructive method for dyes (organic) and pesticides due to less cost. Metal oxides that have properties of semiconductors such as zinc oxide and titanium oxide demonstrated impressive photodecomposition capability when used to degrade dye contaminants [164]. Despite semiconductors’ significant potential for decomposition in presence of the light of different dyes (organic) contaminants, industries with affiliated visible light photocatalysts have low steadiness or efficiency when exposed to light semiconductors having their energy gaps falling in the visible light spectrum that belongs to groups II–VI that have been offered as majestic, feasible options to address such issues [165].

11. Nanomaterials in Remediation of Air Pollution

Nanotechnology can help to clean up the air in a variety of ways. For gaseous reactions, one method is to use nanocatalysts with a larger surface area. Catalysts accelerate chemical processes that convert hazardous vapors from automobiles and industrial facilities into innocuous gases. The removal of air waste to the ground is ineffective; therefore, the filtered chemicals posed a difficulty for disposal [166]. Filters are beneficial in the case of air pollution. A filter has a small porous construction that allows gas to flow through while particles stay trapped inside. The membrane of the filter treats toxins using three mechanisms: filter structure surface contact, inertial force applied while moving the direction of gas, and electric charge generated by particle and filter construction [167]. The primary flaw of filters is that they cause a pressure drop, which necessitates a lot of energy usage. Nanofilters are more efficient than traditional filters, as their pores range from 1 to 10 nm, thereby efficiently removing a variety of microorganisms and organic pollutants. Carbon nanotube-based membranes have a better capability for separating CO₂ from other gases [168]. Carbon nanotubes can capture gases at a pace that is 100-fold faster than current gas separation techniques. As a result, they are suitable for large-scale applications [169]. There seems to be a reverse connection between the efficiency of the gas separation process and the related volume flowing through traditional layers, but carbon-based nanotube membranes cover this. Nanomembrane technology may be utilized to separate and purify gases and pollutant vapors in a variety of sectors, as well as to prevent their discharge into the environment [170]. Nanosensors are a cutting-edge device which can identify and take action for a detectable physical change on such a nanometre scale. Nanoparticles, which are small 3D circular substances, are used as sensors and provide information when a toxin is present in a space [171]. One of the hazards in the commercial sector is the risk of obnoxious and hazardous spillage. Sensors used mostly at commercial levels have recently discovered small amounts of these gases. This requires the use of technical advancements in the creation of faster and more accurate sensors. This type of biosensor consists of single or multimembrane nanotubes that can capture dangerous gas molecules. Smart dust is a new kind of nanosensor. The ultimate goal is to develop a series of advanced sensors in the form of ultralight nanocomputers. Such silicon-based ultrafine particles have a structure that permits them to wirelessly transfer data collected to the main server. The crucial data transportation rate with this sort of sensor is about 1 kbps or more. These solar-powered nanosensors can easily stay hung in the air for hours. Smart dust can convey information such as climate conditions, humidity, and amount of pollutants for up to 20 kilometers and can provide conditions to continuously manage air pollution in a given area [171].

12. Conclusion and Future Prospects

Nanoparticles have revolutionized the future approach for litigation of environment with biotechnology. With the increased progress of humans, industrialization and consumption of reserves are present in nature. There is an urgent requirement for the removal of these pollutants with the least possible side effects to the Earth, though not lamenting the side effects of earlier existing processes like Fenton, coagulation, adsorption, advanced oxidation etc. and their combinations as well. A more sustainable, holistic approach to the tackling of this grave issue can be nanoparticles that may be active while working on both small- and large-scale levels. Diversified nanoparticles have become handy for removing specified pollutants in their native area like sewage spills, landmines, etc. Moreover, they cause a minimum toxic effect during production rates and thus can be well researched forward so that they are more compatible in the future with decreased production costs.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

A. S. Adeleye, J. R. Conway, K. Garner, Y. Huang, Y. Su, and A. A. Keller, “Engineered nanomaterials for water treatment and remediation: costs, benefits, and applicability,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 286, pp. 640–662, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
S. E. Mancebo and S. Q. Wang, “Recognizing the impact of ambient air pollution on skin health,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 2326–2332, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Roy and N. Bharadvaja, “Efficient removal of heavy metals from artificial wastewater using biochar,” Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management, vol. 16, Article ID 100602, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Manisalidis, E. Stavropoulou, A. Stavropoulos, and E. Bezirtzoglou, “Environmental and health impacts of air pollution: a review,” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 8, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Roy, A. Elzaki, V. Tirth et al., “Biological synthesis of nanocatalysts and their applications,” Catalysts, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 1494, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Ahmed, A. Roy, M. Wahab et al., “Applications of nanomaterials in agrifood and pharmaceutical industry,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2021, Article ID 1472096, 10 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Marlon, M. T. Ballew, C. Roser-Renouf, A. Leiserowitz, and E. Maibach, “How hope and doubt affect climate change mobilization,” Frontiers in Communication, vol. 4, p. 20, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kaur and A. Roy, “Bioremediation of heavy metals from wastewater using nanomaterials,” Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 9617–9640, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Khan, “Green nanotechnology for the environment and sustainable development,” Green Materials for Wastewater Treatment, vol. 13, pp. 13–46, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Seewagen, “The threat of global mercury pollution to bird migration: potential mechanisms and current evidence,” Ecotoxicology, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1254–1267, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Kant, “Textile dyeing industry an environmental hazard,” Natural Science, vol. 04, no. 01, pp. 22–26, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Pereira and M. Alves, “Dyes—environmental impact and remediation,” in Environmental Protection Strategies for Sustainable Development, pp. 111–162, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Lellis, C. Z. Fávaro-Polonio, J. A. Pamphile, and J. C. Polonio, “Effects of textile dyes on health and the environment and bioremediation potential of living organisms,” Biotechnology Research and Innovation, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 275–290, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Briffa, E. Sinagra, and R. Blundell, “Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 9, Article ID e04691, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
P. B. Tchounwou, C. G. Yedjou, A. K. Patlolla, and D. J. Sutton, “Heavy metal toxicity and the environment,” Experientia Supplementum, vol. 101, pp. 133–164, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. K. Gautam, R. K. Gautam, M. C. Chattopadhyaya, S. Banerjee, M. C. Chattopadhyaya, and J. D. Pandey, “Heavy metals in the environment: fate, transport, toxicity and remediation technologies,” Nova Science Publishers, vol. 60, pp. 101–130, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
M. A. Hassaan and A. El Nemr, “Pesticides pollution: classifications, human health impact, extraction and treatment techniques,” The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 207–220, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhen, L. Liu, X. Wang, G. Zhong, and J. Tang, “Fates and ecological effects of current-use pesticides (CUPs) in a typical river-estuarine system of Laizhou Bay, North China,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 252, pp. 573–579, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z.-Q. Jia, Y.-C. Zhang, Q.-T. Huang, A. K. Jones, Z.-J. Han, and C.-Q. Zhao, “Acute toxicity, bioconcentration, elimination, action mode and detoxification metabolism of broflanilide in zebrafish, Danio rerio,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 394, Article ID 122521, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-I. Hwang, A. R. Zimmerman, and J.-E. Kim, “Bioconcentration factor-based management of soil pesticide residues: endosulfan uptake by carrot and potato plants,” The Science of the Total Environment, vol. 627, pp. 514–522, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Pandey, F. Masood, H. P. Singh, and D. R. Batish, “Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as environmental pollutants: a review,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 6, pp. 1361–1369, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Masih, A. Masih, A. Kulshrestha, R. Singhvi, and A. Taneja, “Characteristics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in indoor and outdoor atmosphere in the North central part of India,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 177, no. 1–3, pp. 190–198, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Tilley, E. V. Orlova, R. J. C. Gilbert, P. W. Andrew, and H. R. Saibil, “Structural basis of pore formation by the bacterial toxin pneumolysin,” Cell, vol. 121, no. 2, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Dachs, S. J. Eisenreich, and R. M. Hoff, “Influence of eutrophication on air-water exchange, vertical fluxes, and phytoplankton concentrations of persistent organic pollutants,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1095–1102, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. N. Khan and F. Mohammad, in Eutrophication: Challenges and Solutions BT - Eutrophication: Causes, Consequences and Control, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site
B. C. Kelly, M. G. Ikonomou, J. D. Blair, A. E. Morin, and F. A. P. C. Gobas, “Food web–specific biomagnification of persistent organic pollutants,” Science, vol. 317, no. 5835, pp. 236–239, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. V. Ivanina and I. M. Sokolova, “Interactive effects of metal pollution and ocean acidification on physiology of marine organisms,” Current Zoology, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 653–668, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Billé, R. Kelly, A. Biastoch et al., “Taking action against Ocean Acidification: a review of management and policy options,” Environmental Management, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 761–779, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Altenburger, W. Boedeker, M. Faust, and L. H. Grimme, “Regulations for combined effects of pollutants: consequences from risk assessment in aquatic toxicology,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 34, no. 11-12, pp. 1155–1157, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Groffen, “Preliminary study on the distribution of metals and persistent organic pollutants (POPs), including perfluoroalkylated acids (PFAS), in the aquatic environment near Morogoro, Tanzania, and the potential health risks for humans,” Environmental Research: Anthropology and Aesthetics, vol. 192, Article ID 110299, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. C. Vasilachi, D. M. Asiminicesei, D. I. Fertu, and M. Gavrilescu, “Occurrence and fate of emerging pollutants in water environment and options for their removal,” Water, vol. 13, no. 2, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. S. Phale, A. Sharma, and K. Gautam, “Microbial degradation of xenobiotics like aromatic pollutants from the terrestrial environments,” Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products: Waste Management and Treatment Technology, pp. 259–278, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Waldman and Y. Shevah, “Biodegradation and leaching of pollutants: monitoring aspects (technical report),” Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 1595–1603, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Álvarez, E. Valero, R. M. Santos, S. G. P. Varandas, L. S. Fernandes, and F. A. L. Pacheco, “Anthropogenic nutrients and eutrophication in multiple land use watersheds: Best management practices and policies for the protection of water resources,” Land Use Policy, vol. 69, pp. 1–11, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. F. Artiola, J. L. Walworth, S. A. Musil, and M. A. Crimmins, “Soil and land pollution,” in Environmental and Pollution Science, pp. 219–235, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Michaelis, “Global warming: efficient policies in the case of multiple pollutants,” Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 61–77, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Z. Jacobson, “Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 148–173, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Singh and M. Agrawal, “Acid rain and its ecological consequences,” Journal of Environmental Biology, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 15, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Agrawal, B. Singh, M. Rajput, F. Marshall, and J. N. B. Bell, “Effect of air pollution on peri-urban agriculture: a case study,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 323–329, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Orru, K. L. Ebi, and B. Forsberg, “The interplay of climate change and air pollution on health,” Current Environmental Health Reports, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 504–513, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Kelishadi and P. Poursafa, “Air pollution and non-respiratory health hazards for children,” Archives of Medical Science, vol. 4, pp. 483–495, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Siddique, M. R. Ray, and T. Lahiri, “Effects of air pollution on the respiratory health of children: a study in the capital city of India,” Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 95–102, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. N. Ismail, J. Jalaludin, S. A. Bakar, N. H. Hisamuddin, and N. F. Suhaimi, “Association of traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) with DNA damage and respiratory health symptoms among primary school children in selangor,” Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment, vol. 13, no. 2, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Roberts, “Exploration of NO₂ and PM2.5 air pollution and mental health problems using high-resolution data in London-based children from a UK longitudinal cohort study,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 272, pp. 8–17, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Jayaswal, V. Sahu, and B. R. Gurjar, “Water pollution, human health and remediation,” in Energy, Environment, and Sustainability, S. Bhattacharya, A. B. Gupta, A. Gupta, and A. Pandey, Eds., pp. 11–27, Springer, Singapore, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Ghangrekar and P. Chatterjee, “Water pollutants classification and its effects on environment,” in Carbon Nanostructures, pp. 11–26, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Quinete and R. A. Hauser-Davis, “Drinking water pollutants may affect the immune system: concerns regarding COVID-19 health effects,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1235–1246, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Qadri and M. A. Faiq, “Freshwater pollution: effects on aquatic life and human health,” in Fresh Water Pollution Dynamics and Remediation, pp. 15–26, Springer, Singapore, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Ganzenko, D. Huguenot, E. D. van Hullebusch, G. Esposito, and M. A. Oturan, “Electrochemical advanced oxidation and biological processes for wastewater treatment: a review of the combined approaches,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 21, no. 14, pp. 8493–8524, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. N. E. Diagboya and E. D. Dikio, “Silica-based mesoporous materials; emerging designer adsorbents for aqueous pollutants removal and water treatment,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 266, pp. 252–267, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Pi, “Adsorptive and photocatalytic removal of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in water by metal-organic frameworks (MOFs),” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 337, pp. 351–371, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zhang, Y. Li, H. Shen, and D. Shuai, “Simultaneous coupling of photocatalytic and biological processes: a promising synergistic alternative for enhancing decontamination of recalcitrant compounds in water,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 403, Article ID 126365, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Wen, R. Fu, and Q. Li, “Removal of inorganic contaminants in soil by electrokinetic remediation technologies: a review,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 401, Article ID 123345, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Ribeiro, O. C. Nunes, M. F. R. Pereira, and A. M. T. Silva, “An overview on the advanced oxidation processes applied for the treatment of water pollutants defined in the recently launched Directive 2013/39/EU,” Environment, vol. 75, pp. 33–51, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Dewil, D. Mantzavinos, I. Poulios, and M. A. Rodrigo, “New perspectives for advanced oxidation processes,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 195, pp. 93–99, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Holt, G. Barton, and C. Mitchell, “Electrocoagulation as a wastewater treatment,” Environmental Engineering Research, vol. 1000, pp. 41–46, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Fernandes, M. J. Pacheco, L. Ciríaco, and A. Lopes, “Review on the electrochemical processes for the treatment of sanitary landfill leachates: present and future,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 176-177, pp. 183–200, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. S. Amuda and I. A. Amoo, “Coagulation/flocculation process and sludge conditioning in beverage industrial wastewater treatment,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 778–783, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. O. Iwuozor, “Prospects and challenges of using coagulation-flocculation method in the treatment of effluents,” Advanced Journal of Chemistry-Section A, vol. 2, pp. 105–127, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Poznyak, G. L. Bautista, I. Chaírez, R. I. Córdova, and L. E. Ríos, “Decomposition of toxic pollutants in landfill leachate by ozone after coagulation treatment,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 1108–1114, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Aguilar, J. Sáez, M. Lloréns, A. Soler, and J. F. Ortuño, “Nutrient removal and sludge production in the coagulation-flocculation process,” Water Research, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2910–2919, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. C. Khulbe and T. Matsuura, “Removal of heavy metals and pollutants by membrane adsorption techniques,” Applied Water Science, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 19, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zambianchi, M. Durso, A. Liscio et al., “Graphene oxide doped polysulfone membrane adsorbers for the removal of organic contaminants from water,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 326, pp. 130–140, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. El-Geundi, “Adsorbents for industrial pollution control,” Adsorption Science and Technology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 777–787, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Chaukura, W. Gwenzi, N. Tavengwa, and M. M. Manyuchi, “Biosorbents for the removal of synthetic organics and emerging pollutants: opportunities and challenges for developing countries,” Environmental Development, vol. 19, pp. 84–89, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. C. Lindholm-Lehto, J. S. Knuutinen, H. S. J. Ahkola, and S. H. Herve, “Refractory organic pollutants and toxicity in pulp and paper mill wastewaters,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 6473–6499, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Suty, C. De Traversay, and M. Cost, “Applications of advanced oxidation processes: present and future,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 227–233, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. P. James, E. Germain, and S. Judd, “Micropollutant removal by advanced oxidation of microfiltered secondary effluent for water reuse,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 127, pp. 77–83, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. G. De Oliveira, J. P. Ribeiro, J. T. De Oliveira, D. De Keukeleire, M. S. Duarte, and R. F. Do Nascimento, “Degradation of the pesticide chlorpyrifos in aqueous solutions with UV/H₂O₂: optimization and effect of interfering anions,” Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 133–138, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
O. Chedeville, M. Debacq, and C. Porte, “Removal of phenolic compounds present in olive mill wastewaters by ozonation,” Desalination, vol. 249, no. 2, pp. 865–869, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Elazzouzi, K. Haboubi, and M. S. Elyoubi, “Electrocoagulation flocculation as a low-cost process for pollutants removal from urban wastewater,” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 117, pp. 614–626, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Dirany, I. Sirés, N. Oturan, A. Özcan, and M. A. Oturan, “Electrochemical treatment of the antibiotic sulfachloropyridazine: kinetics, reaction pathways, and toxicity evolution,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 4074–4082, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Hassan, E. Mohamedelhassan, and E. K. Yanful, “Solar powered electrokinetic remediation of Cu polluted soil using a novel anode configuration,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 181, pp. 58–67, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Martínez-Huitle and M. Panizza, “Electrochemical oxidation of organic pollutants for wastewater treatment,” Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, vol. 11, pp. 62–71, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
C. A. Martínez-Huitle and S. Ferro, “Electrochemical oxidation of organic pollutants for the wastewater treatment: direct and indirect processes,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1324–1340, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Panizza and G. Cerisola, “Application of diamond electrodes to electrochemical processes,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 191–199, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Jeworski and E. Heinzle, “Combined chemical-biological treatment of wastewater containing refractory pollutants,” Biotechnology Annual Review, vol. 6, pp. 163–196, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Janas and K. K. Koziol, “Carbon nanotube fibers and films: synthesis, applications and perspectives of the direct-spinning method,” Nanoscale, vol. 8, no. 47, pp. 19475–19490, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Jiang, G. Zeng, D. Huang et al., “Remediation of contaminated soils by enhanced nanoscale zero valent iron,” Environmental Research, vol. 163, pp. 217–227, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Guerra, M. Attia, D. Whitehead, and F. Alexis, “Nanotechnology for environmental remediation: materials and applications,” Molecules, vol. 23, no. 7, p. 1760, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. F. Mohamed, “Nanotechnology: future of environmental air pollution control,” Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 429, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Luxa, J. Hartman, T. Antonatos, N. Shaban, P. Oparin, and Z. Sofer, “Non-aqueous solution-processed phosphorene by controlled low-potential electrochemical exfoliation and thin film preparation,” Nanoscale, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 2638–2647, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Quievryn, S. Bernard, and P. Miele, “Polyol-based synthesis of praseodymium oxide nanoparticles,” Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology, vol. 4, p. 7, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Cele, “Preparation of nanoparticles,” in Engineered Nanomaterials - Health and Safety, IntechOpen, London, UK, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
D. I. Garcia-Gutierrez, C. E. Gutierrez-Wing, L. Giovanetti, J. M. Ramallo-López, F. G. Requejo, and M. Jose-Yacaman, “Temperature effect on the synthesis of Au-Pt bimetallic nanoparticles,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 9, pp. 3813–3821, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. D. Cavaliere, A. Perrone, and A. Silvello, “Water electrolysis for the production of hydrogen to be employed in the ironmaking and steelmaking industry,” Metals, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 1816, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Rodríguez-Sánchez, M. C. Blanco, and M. A. López-Quintela, “Electrochemical synthesis of silver nanoparticles,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 104, no. 41, pp. 9683–9688, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Choi, K. Kim, H.-S. Han, M. P. Hwang, and K. H. Lee, “Electrochemical synthesis of red fluorescent silicon nanoparticles,” Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 35–38, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Islam and M. S. Islam, “Electro-deposition method for platinum nano-particles synthesis,” Electro-deposition Method for Platinum Nano-Particles Synthesis, vol. 1, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. P. Kafle, “Introduction to nanomaterials and application of UV-Visible spectroscopy for their characterization,” in Chemical Analysis and Material Characterization by Spectrophotometry, pp. 147–198, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wang, J. Z. Xu, J. J. Zhu, and H. Y. Chen, “Preparation of CuO nanoparticles by microwave irradiation,” Journal of crystal growth, vol. 244, no. 1, pp. 88–94, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. N. Rao, D. Banerjee, A. Datta, S. K. Das, R. Guin, and A. Saha, “Gamma irradiation route to synthesis of highly re-dispersible natural polymer capped silver nanoparticles,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 79, no. 12, pp. 1240–1246, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Marignier, J. Belloni, M. O. Delcourt, and J. P. Chevalier, “Microaggregates of non-noble metals and bimetallic alloys prepared by radiation-induced reduction,” Nature, vol. 317, no. 6035, pp. 344-345, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Abidi and H. Remita, “Gold based nanoparticles generated by radiolytic and photolytic methods,” Recent Patents on Engineering, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 170–188, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Mittal, Y. Chisti, and U. C. Banerjee, “Synthesis of metallic nanoparticles using plant extracts,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 346–356, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. D. Dwivedi and K. Gopal, “Biosynthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles using Chenopodium album leaf extract,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 369, no. 1–3, pp. 27–33, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Mathew, N. Chandrasekaran, and A. Mukherjee, “Biomimetic synthesis of nanoparticles: science, technology & applicability,” in Biomimetics Learning from Nature, InTech, London, UK, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Ahmad, S. Sharma, M. K. Alam et al., “Rapid synthesis of silver nanoparticles using dried medicinal plant of basil,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 81–86, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Panigrahi, S. Kundu, S. Ghosh, S. Nath, and T. Pal, “General method of synthesis for metal nanoparticles,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 411–414, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Iravani, “Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles using plants,” Green Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 10, p. 2638, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Shankar, A. Ahmad, R. Pasricha, and M. Sastry, “Bioreduction of chloroaurate ions by geranium leaves and its endophytic fungus yields gold nanoparticles of different shapes,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 1822, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Singh, M. Talat, D. P. Singh, and O. N. Srivastava, “Biosynthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles by natural precursor clove and their functionalization with amine group,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1667–1675, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gericke and A. Pinches, “Microbial production of gold nanoparticles,” Gold Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Iravani, “Bacteria in nanoparticle synthesis: current status and future prospects,” International Scholarly Research Notices, vol. 2014, Article ID 359316, 18 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Zhang, X. Ma, Y. Gu, H. Huang, and G. Zhang, “Green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles and their potential applications to treat cancer,” Frontiers in Inside Cosmetics, vol. 8, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. W. Johnston, M. A. Wyatt, X. Li et al., “Gold biomineralization by a metallophore from a gold-associated microbe,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 241–243, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Pantidos, “Biological synthesis of metallic nanoparticles by bacteria, fungi and plants,” Journal of Nanomedicine and Nanotechnology, vol. 05, no. 05, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Kalimuthu, R. Suresh Babu, D. Venkataraman, M. Bilal, and S. Gurunathan, “Biosynthesis of silver nanocrystals by Bacillus licheniformis,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 150–153, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-L. Chen, H.-Y. Tuan, C.-W. Tien, W.-H. Lo, H.-C. Liang, and Y.-C. Hu, “Augmented biosynthesis of cadmium sulfide nanoparticles by genetically engineered Escherichia coli,” Biotechnology Progress, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1260–1266, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Mohanpuria, N. K. Rana, and S. K. Yadav, “Biosynthesis of nanoparticles: technological concepts and future applications,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 507–517, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Vahabi, G. A. Mansoori, and S. Karimi, “Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles by fungus trichoderma reesei (a route for large-scale production of AgNPs),” Insciences Journal, vol. 1, pp. 65–79, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Castro, M. L. Blázquez, J. A. Muñoz, F. González, and A. Ballester, “Biological synthesis of metallic nanoparticles using algae,” IET Nanobiotechnology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 109–116, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Luangpipat, I. R. Beattie, Y. Chisti, and R. G. Haverkamp, “Gold nanoparticles produced in a microalga,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 6439–6445, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Kahzad and A. Salehzadeh, “Green synthesis of CuFe₂O₄@Ag nanocomposite using the Chlorella vulgaris and evaluation of its effect on the expression of norA efflux pump gene among Staphylococcus aureus StrainsCuFe₂O₄@Ag nanocomposite using the Chlorella vulgaris and evaluation of its effect on the expression of norA efflux pump gene among Staphylococcus aureus strains,” Biological Trace Element Research, vol. 198, no. 1, pp. 359–370, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Govindaraju, V. Kiruthiga, V. G. Kumar, and G. Singaravelu, “Extracellular synthesis of silver nanoparticles by a marine alga, sargassum wightii grevilli and their antibacterial effects,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 5497–5501, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Dahoumane, C. Yéprémian, C. Djédiat et al., “Improvement of kinetics, yield, and colloidal stability of biogenic gold nanoparticles using living cells of Euglena gracilis microalga,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 79, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. F. Hochella, M. G. Spencer, and K. L. Jones, “Nanotechnology: nature’s gift or scientists’ brainchild?” Environmental Sciences: Nano, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 114–119, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wagner, A. Gondikas, E. Neubauer, T. Hofmann, and F. von der Kammer, “Spot the difference: engineered and natural nanoparticles in the environment—release, behavior, and fate,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 53, no. 46, pp. 12398–12419, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Jeevanandam, A. Barhoum, Y. S. Chan, A. Dufresne, and M. K. Danquah, “Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: history, sources, toxicity and regulations,” Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, vol. 9, pp. 1050–1074, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bhatia, “Nanoparticles types, classification, characterization, fabrication methods and drug delivery applications,” in Natural Polymer Drug Delivery Systems, pp. 33–93, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hasan, “A review on nanoparticles: their synthesis and types,” Research Journal of Recent Sciences, vol. 2277, p. 2502, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Kumar and S. Kumbhat, “Carbon-based nanomaterials,” Essentials in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, pp. 189–236, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Magenheim, M. Y. Levy, and S. Benita, “A new in vitro technique for the evaluation of drug release profile from colloidal carriers-ultrafiltration technique at low pressure,” International Journal of Pharmacy Times, vol. 94, no. 1–3, pp. 115–123, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Nagore, S. Ghotekar, K. Mane, A. Ghoti, M. Bilal, and A. Roy, “Structural properties and antimicrobial activities of polyalthia longifolia leaf extract-mediated CuO nanoparticles,” BioNanoScience, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 579–589, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Roy, “Plant derived silver nanoparticles and their therapeutic applications,” Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 14, pp. 1834–1847, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Raina, A. Roy, and N. Bharadvaja, “Degradation of dyes using biologically synthesized silver and copper nanoparticles,” Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management, vol. 13, Article ID 100278, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Mittal and A. Roy, “Fungus and plant-mediated synthesis of metallic nanoparticles and their application in degradation of dyes,” in Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes, pp. 287–308, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Verma, A. Roy, and N. Bharadvaja, “Remediation of heavy metals using nanophytoremediation,” in Advanced Oxidation Processes for Effluent Treatment Plants, pp. 273–296, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Roy and N. Bharadvaja, “Silver nanoparticle synthesis from Plumbago zeylanica and its dye degradation activity,” Bioinspired, Biomimetic and Nanobiomaterials, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 130–140, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Roy and N. Bharadvaja, “Silver nanoparticles synthesis from a pharmaceutically important medicinal plant Plumbago zeylanica,” MOJ Bioequivalence & Bioavailability, vol. 3, no. 5, p. 46, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Roy and N. Bharadvaja, “Qualitative analysis of phytocompounds and synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Centella asiatica,” Innovative Techniques in Agriculture, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 88–95, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Rafique, I. Sadaf, M. S. Rafique, and M. B. Tahir, “A review on green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their applications,” Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1272–1291, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Marchiol, “Synthesis of metal nanoparticles in living plants,” Italian Journal of Agronomy, vol. 7, no. 3, p. e37, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Parveen, V. Banse, and L. Ledwani, “Green synthesis of nanoparticles: their advantages and disadvantages,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1724, no. 1, Article ID 20048, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Banasiuk, M. Krychowiak, D. Swigon et al., “Carnivorous plants used for green synthesis of silver nanoparticles with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity,” Arabian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1415–1428, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Alam, R. A. A. Khan, A. Ali, H. Sher, Z. Ullah, and M. Ali, “Biogenic synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles via Skimmia laureola and their antibacterial efficacy against bacterial wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 98, pp. 101–108, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-G. Wang, S.-S. Jang, D. S.-H. Wong, S.-S. Shieh, and C.-W. Wu, “Soft-sensor development with adaptive variable selection using nonnegative garrote,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1157–1164, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Huang, Y. Xu, C.-J. Tang, J.-R. Chen, A.-J. Wang, and J.-J. Feng, “Facile and green synthesis of photoluminescent carbon nanoparticles for cellular imaging,” New Journal of Chemistry, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 784–789, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. S. Tourinho, C. A. M. Van Gestel, S. Lofts, C. Svendsen, A. M. V. M. Soares, and S. Loureiro, “Metal-based nanoparticles in soil: fate, behavior, and effects on soil invertebrates,” Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1679–1692, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Sanaeimehr, I. Javadi, and F. Namvar, “Antiangiogenic and antiapoptotic effects of green-synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles using Sargassum muticum algae extraction,” Cancer Nanotechnology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Bakshi and P. C. Abhilash, “Nanotechnology for soil remediation: revitalizing the tarnished resource,” in Nano-Materials as Photocatalysts for Degradation of Environmental Pollutants, pp. 345–370, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Bhadouria, D. Mishra, V. K. Singh et al., “Nanocatalyst types and their potential impacts in agroecosystems: an overview,” in Nano-Materials as Photocatalysts for Degradation of Environmental Pollutants, pp. 323–344, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Arif, N. K. Sethy, L. Kumari, P. K. Mishra, and S. N. Upadhyay, “Recent advances in functionalized polymer-based composite photocatalysts for wastewater treatment,” in Nano-Materials as Photocatalysts for Degradation of Environmental Pollutants, pp. 39–64, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Gaur, G. Flora, M. Yadav, and A. Tiwari, “A review with recent advancements on bioremediation-based abolition of heavy metals,” Environmental Sciences: Processes Impacts, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 180–193, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Peng, Y. Liu, J. Dai, L. Cao, and X. Liu, “A sustainable strategy for remediation of oily sewage: clean and safe,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 240, Article ID 116592, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Murgueitio, L. Cumbal, M. Abril, A. Izquierdo, A. Debut, and O. Tinoco, “Green synthesis of iron nanoparticles: application on the removal of petroleum oil from contaminated water and soils,” Journal of Nanotechnology, vol. 2018, Article ID 4184769, 8 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Sharma, G. Singh, G. Singh, M. Kumar, and V. Bhalla, “Silver nanoparticles: facile synthesis and their catalytic application for the degradation of dyes,” RSC Advances, vol. 5, no. 33, pp. 25781–25788, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. G. Bastús, F. Merkoçi, J. Piella, and V. Puntes, “Synthesis of highly monodisperse citrate-stabilized silver nanoparticles of up to 200 nm: kinetic control and catalytic properties,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 2836–2846, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Ajmal, A. Muhmood, M. Usman et al., “Phosphate removal from aqueous solution using iron oxides: adsorption, desorption and regeneration characteristics,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 528, pp. 145–155, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zheng, “Simultaneous control of soil erosion and arsenic leaching at disturbed land using polyacrylamide modified magnetite nanoparticles,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 702, Article ID 134997, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, Z. Fang, B. Liang, and E. P. Tsang, “Remediation of hexavalent chromium contaminated soil by stabilized nanoscale zero-valent iron prepared from steel pickling waste liquor,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 247, pp. 283–290, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Usman, M. Farooq, A. Wakeel et al., “Nanotechnology in agriculture: current status, challenges and future opportunities,” The Science of the Total Environment, vol. 721, Article ID 137778, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Fu, Y. Yang, R. Zhu et al., “Superior adsorption of phosphate by ferrihydrite-coated and lanthanum-decorated magnetite,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 530, pp. 704–713, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Prasad, V. K. Jain, and A. Varma, “Role of nanomaterials in symbiotic fungus growth enhancement,” Current Science, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 1189–1191, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Hussain, N. B. Singh, A. Singh, H. Singh, and S. C. Singh, “Green synthesis of nanoparticles and its potential application,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 545–560, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Lu, J. Wang, M. Stoller, T. Wang, Y. Bao, and H. Hao, “An overview of nanomaterials for water and wastewater treatment,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 4964828, 10 pages, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Homaeigohar, “The nanosized dye adsorbents for water treatment,” Nanomater (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 10, no. 2, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Bansal, G. R. Chaudhary, and S. K. Mehta, “Comparative study of catalytic activity of ZrO₂ nanoparticles for sonocatalytic and photocatalytic degradation of cationic and anionic dyes,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 280, pp. 475–485, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. K. T. R. Singh, S. Vats, D. Kumar, and S. Tyagi, “Nanomaterials use in wastewater treatment,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Nanotechnology and Chemical Engineering, vol. 21, Bangkuk, Thailand, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
K. B. Tan, M. Vakili, B. A. Horri, P. E. Poh, A. Z. Abdullah, and B. Salamatinia, “Adsorption of dyes by nanomaterials: recent developments and adsorption mechanisms,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 150, pp. 229–242, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-C. Chang and D.-H. Chen, “Adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics of acid dyes on a carboxymethylated chitosan-conjugated magnetic nano-adsorbent,” Macromolecular Bioscience, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 254–261, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Joshi and V. K. Garg, “Applications of Fe₃O₄@AC nanoparticles for dye removal from simulated wastewater,” Chemosphere, vol. 236, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Homaeigohar, A. Zillohu, R. Abdelaziz, M. Hedayati, and M. Elbahri, “A novel nanohybrid nanofibrous adsorbent for water purification from dye pollutants,” Materials, vol. 9, no. 10, p. 848, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Li, T. Zhao, M. Li et al., “One-step construction of Pickering emulsion via commercial TiO₂ nanoparticles for photocatalytic dye degradation,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 249, pp. 1–8, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ghadimi, S. Zangenehtabar, and S. Homaeigohar, “An overview of the water remediation potential of nanomaterials and their ecotoxicological impacts,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 4, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. D. Singh, “Technological options for the removal of arsenic with special reference to South East Asia,” Journal of environmental management, vol. 107, pp. 1–18, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Shao, W. Xiong, R. Zhang, and C. Huang, “Electrospun nanofibers membranes for effective air filtration,” Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, vol. 302, no. 1, Article ID 1600353, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
A. I. Skoulidas, D. S. Sholl, and J. K. Johnson, “Adsorption and diffusion of carbon dioxide and nitrogen through single-walled carbon nanotube membranes,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 124, no. 5, Article ID 054708, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chaturvedi, P. N. Dave, and N. K. Shah, “Applications of nano-catalyst in new era,” Journal of Saudi Chemical Society, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 307–325, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhang, B. Zhao, C. Jiang, J. Yang, and G. Zheng, “Preparation and transport performances of high-density, aligned carbon nanotube membranes,” Nanoscale Research Letters, vol. 101, no. 10, pp. 1–8, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Peng, Y. Su, Y. Zhong, C. Fan, S.-T. Lee, and Y. He, “Silicon nanomaterials platform for bioimaging, biosensing, and cancer therapy,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 612–623, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Arpita Roy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

7267

Downloads

2216

Citations