Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Bone Marrow Research
Volume 2012, Article ID 873695, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/873695
Clinical Study

Both Optimal Matching and Procedure Duration Influence Survival of Patients after Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

1Division of the National Bone Marrow Donor Registry, Lower Silesian Center for Cellular Transplantation, Grabiszynska 105, 53-439 Wroclaw, Poland
2Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, 53-114 Wroclaw, Poland

Received 28 June 2012; Accepted 16 September 2012

Academic Editor: Colette Raffoux

Copyright © 2012 Sylwia Mizia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. http://www.bmdw.org/.
  2. K. Hirv, K. Bloch, M. Fischer et al., “Prediction of duration and success rate of unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donor searches based on the patient's HLA-DRB1 allele and DRB1-DQB1 haplotype frequencies,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 433–440, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. Pédron, V. Guérin-El Khourouj, J. H. Dalle et al., “Contribution of HLA-A/B/C/DRB1/DQB1 common haplotypes to donor search outcome in unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,” Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1612–1628, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. M. Tiercy, G. Nicoloso, J. Passweg et al., “The probability of identifying a 10/10 HLA allele-matched unrelated donor is highly predictable,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 515–522, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Lange, D. Dera-Joachimiak, S. Madej et al., “Activity of the National Polish Bone Marrow Donor Registry—analysis of the matching process successfully completed with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 3316–3318, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Lange, M. Polak, M. Dudkiewicz et al., “Activity of the National Polish Bone Marrow Donor Registry,” in Standardization of Donor-Recipient Matching in Transplantation, A. Lange, Ed., pp. 93–101, Nova Science Publishers, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Labopin and S. Iacobelli, “Statistical guidelines for EBMT,” 2003, http://www.ebmt.org/1WhatisEBMT/Op_Manual/OPMAN_StatGuidelines_oct2003.pdf.
  8. R. Szydlo, “Statistical evaluation of HSCT data,” in Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, The EBMT Handbook, pp. 328–339, 5th edition, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  9. A. Devergie, “Graft versus host disease,” in Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, The EBMT Handbook, pp. 218–235, 5th edition, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. M. Tiercy, “The role of HLA in HSCT,” in Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, The EBMT Handbook, pp. 46–65, 5th edition, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. B. Heemskerk, S. M. van Walraven, J. J. Cornelissen et al., “How to improve the search for an unrelated haematopoietic stem cell donor. Faster is better than more!,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 645–652, 2005. View at Google Scholar