BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2009 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2009 |Article ID 680160 |

Gopaljee Jha, Karnika Thakur, Priyanka Thakur, "The Venturia Apple Pathosystem: Pathogenicity Mechanisms and Plant Defense Responses", BioMed Research International, vol. 2009, Article ID 680160, 10 pages, 2009.

The Venturia Apple Pathosystem: Pathogenicity Mechanisms and Plant Defense Responses

Academic Editor: Sudhir Kumar Sopory
Received27 Mar 2009
Revised10 Aug 2009
Accepted29 Oct 2009
Published28 Jan 2010


Venturia inaequalis is the causal agent of apple scab, a devastating disease of apple. We outline several unique features of this pathogen which are useful for molecular genetics studies intended to understand plant-pathogen interactions. The pathogenicity mechanisms of the pathogen and overview of apple defense responses, monogenic and polygenic resistance, and their utilization in scab resistance breeding programs are also reviewed.

1. Introduction

Apple scab also known as black spot, caused by Venturia inaequalis (Cke.) Wint. is one of the most serious diseases of apple reported from almost all apple producing countries and causes huge economic losses (up to 70% reduction in apple production) [1, 2]. Scab infection leads to deformation in shape and size of the fruits, premature leaf and fruit fall, and enhances susceptibility of tree to chilling and freezing injuries. The oldest available report of scab is in the year 1819 by a Swedish scientist, Fries, however, apples showing scab symptoms are depicted in paintings of sixteenth century, suggesting existence of the disease at that time [3]. The pathogen has been placed into genus Venturia by Winter in 1880. These historical accounts and its taxonomy have been reviewed by MacHardy [2]. V. inaequalis is a heterothallic fungus and contains seven haploid chromosomes [4]. Fusicladium dendriticum and Spilocaea pomi are its anamorphs. Alike other obligate parasites, it generally infects and lives in association with living tissues. However, an ability to be cultured on laboratory medium, possibility of in vitro mating, existence of extensive population diversity, uninucleate conidia, genetically uniform progenies, stability of genotype and phenotype of the progeny even after multiple rounds of subculturing, and availability of standardized protocol for genetic manipulation, and so forth, make it a useful model to study the pathogenesis of obligate fungal pathogens which are generally not culturable. The ease of isolation of ascospores produced by a single meiotic event and their presence in a specific order in which they are produced [4] are the useful features for segregation analysis, centromere mapping, and understanding the processes of fungal meiosis. Furthermore, V. inaequalis and Apple provide an interesting system to study the molecular interactions of a fungal pathogen and a woody host. During the course of co-evolution, V. inaequalis has accumulated various pathogenic attributes (genes) that play a crucial role in invasion without causing much damage to apple [3]. Similarly, apple has evolved mechanisms to prevent severity of the disease. In this review, we summarize the recent literature about the life cycle, pathogenicity mechanisms, nutritional requirements, and hypervariability amongst races of V. inaequalis. The apple defense/resistance mechanisms and their prospects in scab resistance breeding are also discussed.

1.1. V. inaequalis Life Cycle and Pathogenicity

V. inaequalis primarily causes disease on apple cultivars, however, it also infects Malus (Crabapple), Cotoneaster integerrima, Crataegus oxycantha (Hawthorn), Loquat, Pyracantha (Firethorn), Sarcocephalus esculantus, Sorbus (Mountain Ash), and Viburnum. The characteristic disease symptoms on apple include circular olive green velvety, necrotic or chlorotic lesions single or scattered on leaf surface, olivaceous spots on infected sepals and pedicels, and dark colored sharply bordered brown and corky lesions on young fruits while small black spots termed as “pin-point scab” on the matured fruits. The disease symptoms on the fruit and leaf are depicted in Figure 1. Light brown blisters surrounded by whitish rings constitute the symptoms on infected twigs. However, sometimes during severe infections peeling of bark from the twigs occurs which is known as grind or scurf.

V. inaequalis produces sexual and asexual spores, both capable of infecting apple. The pathogenic phase of disease starts with germination of ascospores (sexual spore) which serve as primary source of inoculum. Conidia, the asexual spores, are smooth, 0-1 septate, obpyriform to obclavate in structure, pale to mid-olivaceous brown in color, generally disseminated by wind or splashing rain, and serve as source of secondary infections [2]. Several cycles of conidia production and secondary infections take place within a single growing season of apple. At the beginning of winter, with the onset of leaf fall, the mycelium penetrates a bit deeper into leaf tissues and switches from vegetative to reproductive phase wherein the mycelia of two different mating types undergo sexual reproduction (mating). Following mating, a pseudothecium is produced which exhibits negative geotropism [5]. The asci of V. inaequalis are bitunicate, cylindrical, double walled, and loculus. The ascospore consists of two unequal sized cells having thin brittle outer wall and a thick elastic inner wall which assists persistence of the pathogen during winter [2]. The fungi primarily perenate on fallen leaves, however perenation on twigs and fruits is also reported but in such cases ascospores are not produced and the conidia serve as primary inoculum. The ascospores mature at the time of apple bud break during which host tissues are most susceptible. Once matured, the ascospores are released from the asci and get disseminated by rain and wind. Interestingly, the presence of light is required for optimal discharge of the ascospores [3, 6]. This and several other favorable pathogenic attributes of V. inaequalis are reviewed by MacHardy et al. [3].

In order to colonize and establish disease, the pathogen needs to adhere, germinate, and form infection structures to penetrate the host. The conidia/ascospores of V. inaequalis attach to wet hydrophobic surface of apple and germinate by producing germ tubes, generally formed from the apical end of conidia or any of the two cells of the ascospore. V. inaequalis enters the host through cuticle but not through stomata [2]. Upon contact with cuticle, germ tube gets differentiated into an appressorium and produces adhesive mucilaginous substances predicted to facilitate attachment to the host surface [7]. The mucilaginous substances are composed of proteins and carbohydrates such as -galactose and N-acetylglucosaminyl residues [8]. The presence of melanized ring at the base of growing appressorium is essential for successful pathogenesis [9]. However, Fitzgerald et al. [10] by silencing one of the melanin biosynthesis genes have observed that mutant exhibiting light brown phenotype is capable of infecting apple. Based upon the light brown phenotype associated with the mutant, it can be speculated that the mutant might still be producing melanin sufficient enough for successful pathogenesis. Application of mechanical pressure is not apparent during cuticle penetration [7]. It is hypothesized that the pathogen uses enzymatic hydrolysis to breach cuticle (Table 1). Extracellular cutinases are produced by germinating conidia and mycelium [11, 12]. The observations that treatment of a specific cutinase inhibitor could prevent subcuticular growth and penetration of cuticle by the pathogen further corroborate the role of cutinase in host entry [11]. Esterase-like activity has been reported transiently during germination of conidia, which possibly leads to softening of cutin making it easier for the pathogen to penetrate the cuticle [13]. After penetration, the infection hyphae get differentiated into primary hyphae which further grow to form subcuticular stroma giving rise to conidiophores which bear conidia that bulge out from the host cells by rupturing epidermis. The conidia and conidiophores, together, give a characteristic velvety appearance to the young lesions of scab. The conidia of Venturia are capable of adhesion and germination on nonhost plants such as Pyrus communis, however further development to establish infections occurs only on the host plants [14]. Kucheryava et al. [15] have observed that conidia can germinate, form appressorium and subcuticular hyphae-like structures when grown on a cellophane membrane placed over the PDA (Potato Dextrose Agar) plates, thus mimicking growth during infection process. The growth of Venturia on cellophane could be used to identify genes involved in fungal pathogenesis. By using this system, the authors could identify two genes (namely, Cin1 and Cin3, being cellophane induced) and further demonstrated that they are highly upregulated during apple infections. Studies are underway to establish the role of these genes during pathogenesis on apple.

Locus/GeneAssociated functionsReferences

Avirulence factors
avrVf (avrRvi6)Avirulent on apple cultivars containing Vf (Rvi6) [16]
avrVg (avrRvi1)Avirulent on apple cultivars containing Vg (Rvi1) [16, 17]
avrVm (avrRvi5)Avirulent on apple cultivars containing Vm (Rvi5) [18]
avrVh2 (avrRvi2)Avirulent on apple cultivars containing Vh2 (Vr2; Rvi2) [19]
avrVfh (avrRvi7)Avirulent on apple cultivars containing Vfh (Rvi7) [16]
avrVh8 (avrRvi8)Avirulent on apple cultivars containing Vh8 (Rvi8) [20]
avrVd (avrRvi13)Avirulent on apple cultivars containing Vd (Rvi13) [21]
Cell Wall Degrading enzymes (CWDEs)Promote pathogen entry into the host and facilitates nutrients uptake[22, 23]
Cellulase    ”[22]
-D-glucosidase    ”[22]
Polygalacturonase (endo-PG & Exo-PG)    ”[22, 23]
CutinaseAssists pathogen in cuticle penetration and sub-cuticular growth[11, 22]
EsteraseAssists pathogen in cuticle penetration by softening cutin[13]
MelanoproteinAssists in slow release of CWDEs and diverting the solute/nutrient flow towards the site of infections[24]
Cellophane induced
Cin1Induced during apple infections[15]
Cin3Induced during apple infections[15]

Several mutants of V. inaequalis, defective in biochemical requirements isolated by UV or nitrogen mustard-mediated mutagenesis, demonstrated differential pathogenicity on apple. The mutants demonstrating reduced/non-pathogenicity (auxotrophs of arginine, choline, histidine, methionine, proline, purines, pyrimidines, and riboflavin) might be unable to obtain the particular biochemical from host, whereas the mutants capable of pathogenicity (auxotrophs of nicotinic acid, biotin, reduced sulfur, inositol, and pantothenic acid) could derive the nutrients from the host. Both the pathogenic and non-pathogenic biochemical mutants were capable of host penetration and disease establishment. However, the non pathogenic mutants exhibited very limited growth and were unable to sporulate with the choline mutant as an exception. The growth and sporulation deficiency of non pathogenic mutants (adenine mutant being exception) were restored if the particular biochemicals were supplied on the host surfaces.

The most enigmatic feature of V. inaequalis is that it forms subcuticular stroma without significant damage to host tissues. It is hypothesized to use cell wall-degrading enzymes (CWDEs) to breach plant cell wall to derive nutrients without forming haustorium. However, that fact that no obvious damage to the host tissues is observed until pathogen starts conidiating suggests a minor role of these enzymes in nutrient uptake. The cellulolytic, cutinolytic, pectinolytic, and -D-glucosidase activities have been detected from the culture supernatant ([2], Table 1). The endo-polygalacturonase (PG) and exo-PG like activities are reported during in vitro growth of the pathogen [22, 23]. It is speculated that the CWDEs of Venturia might be tightly attached with its cell wall and are released in a controlled manner to degrade the host cell wall to facilitate nutrient uptake. In other plant-pathosystems, the CWDEs serve as important virulence factors. However, their action in degrading plant cell walls also serves as a mark of infection and results in induction of plant defense response [2527]. The controlled release of CWDEs might be a strategy of Venturia to prevent induction of host defense response which if successfully mounted would prevent growth of the pathogen. The role of CWDEs during pathogenicity on apple and their ability to induce defense responses are yet to be established. Melanin (generally present as melanoprotein) produced by V. inaequalis is speculated to tether CWDEs and facilitates their slow release [24]. The melanoprotein further assists in diverting the solute flow towards the site of infections, probably by altering the membrane permeability and solute transport system of apple to facilitate availability of nutrients for pathogen growth and development [2].

1.2. Hypervariability of V. inaequalis

The isolates of V. inaequalis are hypervariable and exhibit differential pathogenicity on apple cultivars (known as differential hosts). Based upon such differences, the pathogen has been categorized into eight physiological races [2, 16, 20]. The salient features of these races are summarized in Table 2. However, some of the isolates of Venturia are capable of growing on two different differential hosts and hence it is difficult to classify them to particular race. Recently, Bus et al. [28] have proposed a new nomenclature by reconsidering the differential host used in previous studies. They propose to replace the previously used differential host containing more than one R genes with new accession/selection which carries only one R gene. This system of nomenclature is robust, as per international standard, and has a feature to update the differential host each time a new R gene is discovered [28].

RacesPathological characteristics on apple cultivars

Race1Non sporulating lesion on Dolgo, R 12740-7A (a Russian cultivar) and Geneva
Race 2Sporulating lesions on Dolgo, Geneva and some progenies of R 12740-7A
Race 3Sporulating lesions on Geneva, and non sporulating lesion on Dolgo, R 12740-7A
Race 4Non sporulating lesion on Dolgo, Geneva and sporulating lesion on those progenies of R12740-7A on which race 2 isolates cannot sporulate
Race 5Sporulating lesions on Vm R gene containing cultivars
Race 6Sporulating lesions on Vf hybrids but cannot infect Malus floribunda 821 containing Vfh R gene
Race 7Can infect cultivars having Vf and Vfh R gene but cannot infect Golden delicious which contains Vg gene
Race 8 Can infect Golden delicious, Royal gala, and cultivars containing Vh8 R gene

References: Races 1 to 5: MacHardy, 1996 [2], races 6 and 7: Bénaouf and Parisi, 2000 [16], race 8: Bus et al., 2005 [20].

The variations in sequences of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the ribosomal DNA of V. inaequalis, presence of group one intron in this region [2932] and various molecular markers such as RAPD, PCR-RFLP [32, 33], AFLP [34, 35], and Microsatellites [32, 33, 35, 36] have been used to reveal genetic diversity amongst the isolates collected from different regions of the world. Gladieux et al. [35] using microsatellite markers have revealed maximum diversity amongst the isolates from Asia followed by Europe. The authors speculated that the pathogen might have originated in Asia and from there spread to Europe and recently to other apple growing countries. Hypervariability and evolution of strains that have overcome host resistance are attributed to the ability of Venturia to recombine its genetic material every year.

1.3. Apple Defense Responses

During the course of coevolution, apple has evolved mechanisms to prevent the severity of scab. The isolates of V. inaequalis provoke variable symptoms on different apple cultivars [2, 37, 38]. Based upon the extent of pathogen growth and nature of symptoms imparted by them on different apple cultivars, the responses are classified into class 0, 1, 2, 3a (syn. Class M), 3b (syn. Class3), and 4 (Table 3). The classes 0 to 3 are considered to be resistance responses while class 4 is a susceptible response. Several monogenic and polygenic loci capable of imparting scab resistance have been identified from wild cultivars of apple [2, 37, 39]. Interestingly, some of the susceptible cultivars also demonstrate variable extent of resistance against isolates of the pathogen [40]. The matured leaves of apple demonstrate ontogenic resistance because of which the pathogen growth is suppressed immediately after cuticle penetration and appearance of disease symptom gets delayed [2]. The strengthened cell wall and cuticular membrane along with sub-cuticular pH of such leaves are speculated to play a role in governing such resistance. A breakdown of ontogenic resistance revealed by restored growth of the pathogen is observed in the old senescing leaves of apple. Detailed studies are needed to elucidate the functionality of such resistance and understand its breakdown mechanism.

S.N.R-GeneSourc /hostLinkage groupResistance respons Molecular marker ( Distance from the gene in cM)Reference
Old nameNew name

1VaRvi10Antonovka Type PI 172623 Differential host: h10LG-1Class 1B398480 (16)[37]
2VbRvi12Hansen’s baccata #2 Differential host: h12LG-12 (Distal end)Class 2 to 3bHi02d05 (7.8) Hi07f01(13.7)[37]
3VbjRvi11Malus baccata jackii Differential host: h11LG-2 (Distal end)Class 0 to 3bCH05e03 (0.6) T6 (3.9)[37]
4VdRvi13Durello di Forli Differential host: h13LG-10 (Proximal end)Class 2OPAF07-880 (2.0) CH2b07 (9.0)[37]
5Vd31980-015-025LG1CH-Vf1 (1) 67005F17 (7)[63]
6VdgRvi9J34; Differential host: h9[64]
7Rvi14Dülmener Rosenapfel Differential host: h14LG-6 (Proximal end)Class 2HB09TC (5)[65]
8VfRvi6“Priscilla” Differential host: h6LG-1 (Distal end)Class 0 to 3bM18 (0.2) CH-Vf1 (0.0) AL07 (0.9)[37]
9VfhRvi7Malus floribunda 821 Differential host: h7LG-8Class 1[66]
10VgRvi1Golden Delicious Differential host: h1LG-12 (Distal end)Class 2MC105 (3.0) CH01D03 (0.5)[37]
11Vh2Rvi2Malus pumila R12740-7A (TSR34T15) Differential host: h2LG-2 (Distal end)Class 2OPL 19 433(1) Ch02b10 (8)[37]
12Vh3.1Rvi3Q71; Differential host: h3[64]
13Vh4/Vr1Rvi4Malus pumila R12740-7A (TSR33T239) Differential host: 4LG-2 (Distal end)Class 1S22 (4) CH02c02 (5)[37]
14Vh8Rvi8Malus sieversii W193B Differential host: 8LG-2 (Distal end)Class 2OPL19 (1.3)[37]
15VmRvi5Malus micromalus 245-38, Malus atrosanguinea 840 Differential host: h5LG-17 (Distal end)Class1OPB12 (6)[67]
16Vr2Rvi15GMAL 2473 Differential host: h15LG-2 (Proximal end)Class 0 to 2CH02c02a (0.0)[37]

The apple cultivar from where the gene has been isolated.
The characteristics of resistance response imparted by these R genes on apple against scab infection. Class 0: no symptoms; Class 1: pit type hypersensitive response like reactions; Class 2: irregular edged chlorotic lesions with slight necrotic center with no sporulation; Class 3a: chlorotic and necrotic lesions with rare sporulation; Class 3b: prominent sporulations with chlorotic and necrotic lesions.

Besides race specific and ontogenic resistance, apple employs diverse defense responses which provide resistance, albeit variable and suppress growth and spread of the pathogen. Ultrastructural studies have revealed that although conidia could germinate on apple leaves undergoing defense responses, formation of primary hyphae is delayed and growth of subcuticular stroma is suppressed resulting in reduced conidiation [2, 41]. Phenolics produced in response to V. inaequalis infections in apple are known to inhibit pathogen growth and are ascribed to be associated with defense mechanisms of scab resistant cultivars [2]. The inhibition of phenylalanine ammonia lyase (a key enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of phenolics) in scab resistant cultivar Sir Prize could render it susceptible to scab infections [42]. Phloridzin (a dihydrochalcone glycoside) produced by apple in response to Venturia, accumulated around the sites of infection, is postulated to get degraded into phloretin by pathogen and hinder its growth [2, 43]. Recently, efforts have been made to characterize genes involved in phloridzin biosynthesis in apple [44]. The treatment of yeast extract (a mimic of fungus infection) induces synthesis of six new compounds in the cell suspensions of apple cultivar Liberty but not in McIntosh [43]. The chemical structures of several of these compounds have been identified and they are speculated to function as phytoalexins [43, 45]. One of these compounds, named Malusfuran (2,4-methoxy-3-hydroxy-9-O- -D-glucosyloxydibenzofuran) and its aglycone and dibenzofuran derivatives can suppress the germination and growth of conidia/mycelium of V. inaequalis.

Several pathogenicity related (PR) proteins including -1,3-glucanase, chitinase, cysteine protease, osmotin-like protein, along with PR1 and thaumatin-like protein are constitutively expressed in the apoplast of resistant apple cultivar Remo and are induced by V. inaequalis in the susceptible cultivar Elstar [46]. Degenhardt et al. [47] have identified several defense-related genes and genes involved in cellular detoxification upregulated in the uninfected young leaves of Remo as compared to Elstar. The constitutive expression of these genes in Remo is speculated to constitute a part of apple defense response. Interestingly a large number of metallothioneins (involved in metal ion detoxifications) were constitutively expressed in Remo, while they get induced following V. inaequalis infections in Elster. The molecular basis of constitutive expression of these genes in the resistant cultivar and their pathogen inducibility in susceptible cultivar should be explored to fish out the key regulatory molecules. The identified key genes if used to raise transgenic apple under pathogen inducible promoters can upregulate defense-related genes upon contact with the pathogen and suppress disease. Two subclasses of PR-10 gene (APa and APb) are induced by acibenzolar-S-methyl, a salicylic acid (SA, a plant defense hormone) analog in apple leaves [48]. Significantly higher expression of APa is induced following Venturia infection during resistant interactions than during compatible interactions and the kinetics of its expression coincide with appearance of visible necrosis [49]. The transgenic apple expressing either the endo (ech42) or the exo (nag70) chitinase gene of Trichoderma harzianum (syn. T. atroviride) have been found to impart scab resistance in a susceptible cultivar McIntosh ([50, 51], Table 4). The transgenic lines containing both endo and exo-chitinase genes exhibit synergism in promoting scab resistance ([51], Table 4). The overexpression of these genes could impart resistance in another susceptible cultivar Galaxy and strengthen resistance in the Vf gene containing cultivar Ariane against race 6 ([52], Table 4). This study has initiated a direction to combine defense related genes along with resistance genes to enhance the durability and efficacy of apple resistance.

GeneGene sourceApple cultivar (s) used in studyInferenceReference

ech42 (Endo)Trichoderma atrovirideMcIntosh,Transgenic plants are resistant to mix of Races 1-5[50, 51]
nag70 (Exo)Trichoderma atrovirideMcIntoshTransgenic plants are resistant to mix of Races 1-5[50, 51]
ech42 (Endo) & nag70 (Exo)Trichoderma atrovirideMcIntoshExhibit Synergism in imparting scab resistance against mix of Races 1-5[51]
Galaxy, AraineTransgenic plants are resistant to Race 1 and 6[52]
Puriondoline B (PinB)WheatGalaxy, ArianeTransgenic plants are resistant to Race 6[53]
MpNPR1-1AppleGalaxyTransgenic plants are resistant to mix of Races 1-5[56]
LRPKm1AppleFlorina, Golden DeliciousUpregulated by SA treatment and during Venturia infections[75]

Puroindoline B (PinB), a cysteine rich antifungal protein of wheat (Table 4), can suppress the growth of V. inaequalis [53]. The PinB gene when constitutively expressed in the cultivars Galaxy (susceptible to race 1) and Ariane could impart significant but variable resistance against race 6 of the pathogen in transgenic lines of both the cultivars, however, the transgenic Galaxy lines were still susceptible to race 1 [54]. This suggests that physiological differences between the strains can govern the PinB mediated resistance. Combining antifungal proteins along with resistance/defense-related genes can be a good strategy to enhance durability and efficiency of scab resistance in apple.

The NPR1 (Non-expressor of PR) protein plays a key role in systemic acquired resistance (SAR) in Arabidopsis thaliana [55]. Three AtNPR1 orthologs (MpNPR1-1, 2, and 3) have been identified from apple ([56], Table 4). The transgenic lines overexpressing MpNPR1-1 (considered as true apple orthog of AtNPR1) exhibit broad spectrum resistance against fungal (V. inaequalis and Gymnosporangium juniperi-virginianae, causative of cedar apple rust disease) and bacterial (Erwinia amylovora, causative of fire blight disease) pathogens, probably due to enhanced expression of PR proteins.

1.4. Gene-for-Gene Interactions

Plants have evolved a set of genes to detect and mount resistance responses against pathogens. Such genes are known as resistance (R) genes, and the pathogenic factors which are detected by the products of these genes are called Avirulence (avr) factors because their presence renders the pathogen avirulent [57]. This type of interaction, popularly known as gene-for-gene interaction, is followed by Venturia-Apple pathosystem [2, 17]. Several R gene containing loci have been isolated from apple cultivars [2, 37] and efforts have been made to characterize the avr genes of V. inaequalis (Table 1). According to a new nomenclature proposed by Bus et al. [28], apple scab resistance genes are named as Rvik (R refers to resistance gene, vi refers to Venturia inaequalis, and k refers to differential host) and the corresponding avr genes of the pathogen are named as avrRvik. The new and the old names of the apple resistance genes along with their differential host are mentioned in Table 3. The avrVf (avrRvi6) and avrVg (avrRvi1) have been isolated as two independently segregating factors which could render the pathogen avirulent on the Vf (Rvi6) and Vg (Rvi1) R gene containing apple cultivars, respectively [16]. The position of the avrVg (avrRvi1) has been determined using molecular markers [58] and several cosegregating and flanking (both sides) molecular markers have been isolated for this gene [59]. A contig of 330 kb spanning avrVg (avrRvi1) has been identified following chromosome walking on a BAC library of V. inaequalis [59]. Experiments involving multiple approaches are in progress to identify, clone, and sequence the gene and analyze its functionality [59]. AvrVm (AvrRvi5) like activity (inducing resistance on Vm containing apple) has been identified from culture supernatant of race 1 isolate [18]. The activity is narrowed down to three proteins having low molecular weight and low isoelectric points, however further work is needed to identify and characterize the protein [18].

1.4.1. Vf(Rvi6) Gene

Vf (Rvi6) gene, isolated from wild crab apple Malus floribunda 821, is the most studied R gene of apple [2, 37]. The Vf (Rvi6) gene has been extensively used for breeding scab resistance [2, 37, 60, 61]. Races 6 and 7 of V. inaequalis have evolved to breach the Vf (Rvi6) resistance [33, 62], however, they exhibit lack of genetic diversity and are clonally propagated due to founder effect [34].

Extensive research has been made to characterise the Vf (Rvi6) gene, cumulation of which has led to the isolation and full length cloning of the gene [37]. The gene HcrVf2 (Homologs to C. fulvus R genes of the Vf  region; syn. Vfa2) is considered to be the true Vf (Rvi6) gene which is constitutively expressed in apple [6871]. Its expression under CaMV35S promoter into a susceptible cultivar Gala [68] or under its native promoter into the susceptible cultivars Gala [71, 72] and Elstar [71] has been found to impart scab resistance comparable to that of Vf cultivars. Variations in the length of HcrVf native promoter could influence the gene expression and level of imparted resistance [71]. Alike Vf (Rvi6) gene, the resistance imparted by HcrVf2 demonstrates race specificity being susceptible to race 6 and 7 of the pathogen [73]. Effort has been initiated to understand the molecular cascades triggered by pathogen attack in HcrVf2 transgenic lines. In order to identify the genetic network involved in downstream signaling imparted by HcrVf2 in the transgenic apple cultivar Gala upon pathogen attack, a cDNA-AFLP protocol has been optimized by Paris et al. [74].

Beside HcrVf2, several Vf paralogs have been identified from apple, and gene duplication events seem to have played a role in their evolution [37]. These paralogs are thought to be reservoirs which apple might use following somatic recombination to develop resistance against rapidly evolving strains of the pathogen [76]. Recently, Malnoy et al. have raised transgenics of susceptible cultivars Galaxy and McIntosh expressing Vf (Rvi6) gene (Vfa2; syn. HcrVf2) and their paralogs Vfa1 (syn. HcrVf1) and Vfa4 under their respective promoters [77]. The Vfa1 and Vfa2 genes but not the Vfa4 gene imparted scab resistance in transgenic plants. The resistance imparted by Vfa2 expressed with its own promoter was less than that observed when the gene is expressed by CaMV35 or that exhibited by the Vf (Rvi6) cultivars obtained following classical breeding. The high level of expression by CaMV35 promoter and copresence of Vfa1 and Vfa2 genes in the Vf (Rvi6) introgressed cultivars are speculated to be a cause of observed variations. The cotransformation of Vfa1 and Vfa2 genes in apple should shed lights on synergism between them in imparting scab resistance.

1.5. Other Venturia Resistance Genes of Apple

Besides the Vf (Rvi6) gene, several R genes have been isolated which impart variable degrees of resistance ranging from class 0 to class 3b in apple. They are Va (Rvi10), Vb (Rvi12), Vbj (Rvi11), Vd (Rvi13), Vdg (Rvi9), Vfh (Rvi7), Vg (Rvi1), Vm(Rvi5), Vh2 (Rvi2), Vh3.1(Rvi3), Vh4 (Rvi4), Vh8 (Rvi8), Vr2 (Rvi15), and Rvi14 (Table 3). Recently, Vd3 resistance gene has been identified on LG1, close to Vf (Rvi6) locus between CH-Vf1 and 67105F17 markers [63]. Almost all the characterized plant R genes contain Leucine-rich repeats [57]. An apple Leucine-rich repeat (LRR) receptor-like protein kinase, LRPKm1, having domain architecture atypical of LRR receptor is speculated to be associated with apple defense against Venturia infection ([75], Table 4). The gene exhibits rapid and early induction during resistance interactions whereas a slow but steady increase even after 72 hours of infection is observed during susceptible interactions.

Beside monogenic R genes, several polygenic sources of scab resistance are known. Several quantitative trait loci (QTLs) imparting scab resistance and a number of resistance gene analogs (RGA; containing LRR and Nuclotide Binding Site domains) have been identified from different apple cultivars [37, 65]. Interestingly, quite a few of these R genes map to the same locus. The colocalization of the RGAs, QTLs, and R genes is a useful feature which should be utilized in apple breeding programs to cotransfer them into susceptible varieties. Since the pathogen has rendered several of the monogenic R genes ineffective, it will be useful to pyramid several such genes or there combination with other source of resistance for imparting effective and durable scab resistance as evolving resistance against the cocktail of these genes might be a difficult task for the pathogen. The availability of closely linked molecular markers for most of the known monogenic resistance genes and several other resistance related genes will facilitate work in this direction. In order to strategize breeding programmes, international effort “Monitoring of Venturia inaequalis virulences” has been initiated to analyse whether a particular apple R gene is breached by a particular race of pathogen and to what extent that race is spread ([64], Furthermore, it has been proposed to standardize reporting of molecular markers associated in coupling with the new and previously reported R genes in relation with apple cultivars “Gala”, “Golden Delicious”, “Fiesta”, and “Prima” as standard.

2. Future Prospects

It might be evident from this review that V. inaequalis is an important plant pathogen because it causes huge economic losses and also has a very interesting lifestyle. It is an appropriate time to sequence whole genome of the pathogen. The availability of genome sequence will not only stimulate research in the field of Venturia-apple interactions and contribute to the basic understanding of this pathosystem but can also revolutionize the understanding of pathogenesis of other obligate pathogens. The genome sequence will help in identification of targets for development of new fungicides that are needed as the rapidly evolving pathogen has overcome most of the commonly used fungicides. Understanding the mechanisms of Venturia pathogenesis and intricacies of its interaction with apple should provide important insights for developing new strategies to combat the disease. The whole genome mutagenesis screen should be initiated to identify key virulence factors. The availability of standardized transformation methodologies in V. inaequalis will facilitate such efforts. The mechanism involved in break down of R gene mediated resistance by the pathogen should be explored. Understanding defense response associated signal transduction pathway of apple and characterizing key genes involved in imparting resistance will be very useful in engineering scab resistant apple. Availability of microarray platform for apple could trigger research to characterize the defense response associated transcriptome. The proteomics approach can be an alternative for this purpose. Pyramiding different resistance and defense related genes into a single cultivar seems to be helpful in imparting effective and durable resistance. Conventional breeding might take years to achieve the goal; however, using transgenic approach the goal can be achieved in a lesser span of time. Apple promoters that are induced upon Venturia infection should be identified to use them in a transgenic approach to express the key defense/resistance related genes. Expressing genes under apple promoters and generating marker-free plants can enhance the acceptability of the transgenic/cisgenic apple amongst the consumers.


Karnika Thakur and Priyanka Thakur are supported by a research fellowship from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) and University Grant Commission (UGC), Government of India, respectively. The authors acknowledge the inputs and suggestions given by Dr PS Ahuja and Shammi Bhatti during manuscript preparation. The work has been supported by research funding from CSIR. They acknowledge that, due to space constraints, they have not been able to cite the valuable work of several researchers in this review. IHBT publication number: 0876.


  1. A. R. Biggs, “Apple scab,” in Compendium of Apple and Pear Diseases, A. L. Jones and H. S. Aldwinckle, Eds., pp. 6–9, APS, St. Paul, Minn, USA, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  2. W. E. MacHardy, Apple Scab, Biology, Epidemiology, and Management, APS, St. Paul, Minn, USA, 1996.
  3. W. E. MacHardy, D. M. Gadoury, and C. Gessler, “Parasitic and biological fitness of Venturia inaequalis: relationship to disease management strategies,” Plant Disease, vol. 85, no. 10, pp. 1036–1051, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  4. P. R. Day, D. M. Boone, and G. W. Keitt, “Venturia inaequalis (Cke.) Wint. XI. The chromosome number,” American Journal of Botany, vol. 43, pp. 835–838, 1956. View at: Google Scholar
  5. D. M. Gadoury and W. E. MacHardy, “Negative geotropism in Venturia inaequalis,” Phytopathology, vol. 75, pp. 856–859, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  6. A. Stensvand, H. Eikemo, R. C. Seem, and D. M. Gadoury, “Ascospore release by Venturia inaequalis during periods of extended daylight and low temperature at Nordic latitudes,” European Journal of Plant Pathology, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 173–178, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K. J. Smereka, W. E. MacHardy, and A. P. Kausch, “Cellular differentiation in Venturia inaequalis ascospores during germination and penetration of apple leaves,” Canadian Journal of Botany, vol. 65, pp. 2549–2561, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  8. C. F. A. Schumacher, U. Steiner, H.-W. Dehne, and E.-C. Oerke, “Localized adhesion of nongerminated Venturia inaequalis conidia to leaves and artificial surfaces,” Phytopathology, vol. 98, no. 7, pp. 760–768, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. U. Steiner and E.-C. Oerke, “Localized melanization of appressoria is required for pathogenicity of Venturia inaequalis,” Phytopathology, vol. 97, no. 10, pp. 1222–1230, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. Fitzgerald, J. A. L. van Kan, and K. M. Plummer, “Simultaneous silencing of multiple genes in the apple scab fungus, Venturia inaequalis, by expression of RNA with chimeric inverted repeats,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 963–971, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. W. Köller, D. M. Parker, and C. M. Becker, “Role of cutinase in the penetration of apple leaves by Venturia inaequalis,” Phytopathology, vol. 81, pp. 1375–1379, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  12. W. Köller and D. M. Parker, “Purification and characterization of cutinase from Venturia inaequalis,” Phytopathology, vol. 79, pp. 278–283, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  13. R. L. Nicholson, J. Kuc, and E. B. Williams, “Histochemical demonstration of transitory esterase activity in Venturia inaequalis,” Phytopathology, vol. 62, pp. 1242–1247, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  14. M. Chevalier, C. Bernard, M. Tellier et al., “Host and non-host interaction of Venturia inaequalis and Venturia pirina on Pyrus communis and Malus x domestica,” Acta Horticulturae, vol. 663, pp. 205–208, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  15. N. Kucheryava, J. K. Bowen, P. W. Sutherland et al., “Two novel Venturia inaequalis genes induced upon morphogenetic differentiation during infection and in vitro growth on cellophane,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 1329–1339, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. G. Bénaouf and L. Parisi, “Genetics of host-pathogen relationships between Venturia inaequalis races 6 and 7 and Malus species,” Phytopathology, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 236–242, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  17. D. M. Boone, “Genetics of Venturia inaequalis,” Annual Review of Phytopathology, vol. 9, pp. 297–318, 1971. View at: Google Scholar
  18. J. Win, D. R. Greenwood, and K. M. Plummer, “Characterisation of a protein from Venturia inaequalis that induces necrosis in Malus carrying the Vm resistance gene,” Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 193–202, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. V. G. M. Bus, E. H. A. Rikkerink, W. E. van de Weg et al., “The Vh2 and Vh4 scab resistance genes in two differential hosts derived from Russian apple R12740-7A map to the same linkage group of apple,” Molecular Breeding, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 103–116, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. V. G. M. Bus, F. N. D. Laurens, W. E. van de Weg et al., “The Vh8 locus of a new gene-for-gene interaction between Venturia inaequalis and the wild apple Malus sieversii is closely linked to the Vh2 locus in Malus pumila R12740-7A,” New Phytologist, vol. 166, no. 3, pp. 1035–1049, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. L. Parisi, V. Fouillet, H. J. Schouten et al., “Variability of the pathogenicity of Venturia inaequalis in Europe,” Acta Horticulturae, vol. 663, pp. 107–113, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  22. A. Kollar, “Characterization of an endopolygalacturonase produced by the apple scab fungus, Venturia inaequalis,” Mycological Research, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 313–319, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. Valsangiacomo and C. Gessler, “Purification and characterization of an exo-polygalacturonase produced by Venturia inaequalis, the causal agent of apple scab,” Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 63–77, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  24. E. S. Jacobson, “Pathogenic roles for fungal melanins,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 708–717, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. G. Jha, R. Rajeshwari, and R. V. Sonti, “Bacterial type two secretion system secreted proteins: double-edged swords for plant pathogens,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 891–898, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. A. Ryan and E. E. Farmer, “Oligosaccharide signals in plants: a current assessment,” Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 651–674, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  27. G. Jha, R. Rajeshwari, and R. V. Sonti, “Functional interplay between two Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae secretion systems in modulating virulence on rice,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. V. Bus, E. Rikkerink, H. S. Aldwinckle et al., “A proposal for the nomenclature of Venturia inaequalis races,” Acta Horticulturae, vol. 814, pp. 739–746, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  29. B. Le Cam, L. Parisi, and L. Arene, “Evidence of two formae speciales in Venturia inaequalis, responsible for apple and Pyracantha scab,” Phytopathology, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 314–320, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  30. G. Schnabel, E. L. Schnabel, and A. L. Jones, “Characterization of ribosomal DNA from Venturia inaequalis and its phylogenetic relationship to rDNA from other tree-fruit Venturia species,” Phytopathology, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 100–108, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  31. I. Tenzer and C. Gessler, “Subdivision and genetic structure of four populations of Venturia inaequalis in Switzerland,” European Journal of Plant Pathology, vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 565–571, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. I. Tenzer and C. Gessler, “Genetic diversity of Venturia inaequalis across Europe,” European Journal of Plant Pathology, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 545–552, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. F. Guérin and B. Le Cam, “Breakdown of the scab resistance gene Vf in apple leads to a founder effect in populations of the fungal pathogen Venturia inaequalis,” Phytopathology, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 364–369, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  34. X. Xu, J. Yang, V. Thakur, A. Roberts, and D. J. Barbara, “Population variation of apple scab (Venturia inaequalis) isolates from Asia and Europe,” Plant Disease, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 247–252, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. P. Gladieux, X.-G. Zhang, D. Afoufa-Bastien, R.-M. V. Sanhueza, M. Sbaghi, and B. Le Cam, “On the origin and spread of the scab disease of apple: out of central Asia,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 1, article e1455, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. F. Guérin, P. Franck, A. Loiseau, M. Devaux, and B. Le Cam, “Isolation of 21 new polymorphic microsatellite loci in the phytopathogenic fungus Venturia inaequalis,” Molecular Ecology Notes, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 268–270, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. C. Gessler, A. Patocchi, S. Sansavini, S. Tartarini, and L. Gianfranceschi, “Venturia inaequalis resistance in apple,” Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 473–503, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. Chevalier, Y. Lespinasse, and S. Renaudin, “A microscopic study of different classes of symptoms coded by the Vf gene in apple for resistance to scab (Venturia ineaqualis),” Plant Pathology, vol. 40, pp. 249–256, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  39. E. B. Williams and J. Kuc, “Resistance in Malus to Venturia inaequalis,” Annual Review of Phytopathology, vol. 7, pp. 223–246, 1969. View at: Google Scholar
  40. H. Sierotzki, M. Eggenschwiler, O. Boillat, J. M. McDermott, and C. Gessler, “Detection of variation in virulence toward susceptible apple cultivars in natural populations of Venturia inaequalis,” Phytopathology, vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 1005–1009, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  41. F. Ortega, U. Steiner, and H.-W. Dehne, “Induced resistance to apple scab: microscopic studies on the infection cycle of Venturia inaequalis (Cke.) Wint,” Journal of Phytopathology, vol. 146, no. 8-9, pp. 399–405, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  42. U. Mayr, S. Michalek, D. Treutter, and W. Feucht, “Phenolic compounds of apple and their relationship to scab resistance,” Journal of Phytopathology, vol. 145, no. 2-3, pp. 69–75, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  43. G. Hrazdina, W. Borejsza-Wysocki, and C. Lester, “Phytoalexin production in an apple cultivar resistant to Venturia inaequalis,” Phytopathology, vol. 87, no. 8, pp. 868–876, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  44. C. Gosch, H. Halbwirth, J. Kuhn, S. Miosic, and K. Stich, “Biosynthesis of phloridzin in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.),” Plant Science, vol. 176, no. 2, pp. 223–231, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. G. Hrazdina, “Response of scab-susceptible (McIntosh) and scab-resistant (Liberty) apple tissues to treatment with yeast extract and Venturia inaequalis,” Phytochemistry, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 485–492, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. A. E. Gau, M. Koutb, M. Piotrowski, and K. Kloppstech, “Accumulation of pathogenesis-related proteins in the apoplast of a susceptible cultivar of apple (Malus domestica cv. Elstar) after infection by Venturia inaequalis and constitutive expression of PR genes in the resistant cultivar Remo,” European Journal of Plant Pathology, vol. 110, no. 7, pp. 703–711, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. J. Degenhardt, A. N. Al-Masri, S. Kürkcüoglu, I. Szankowski, and A. E. Gau, “Characterization by suppression subtractive hybridization of transcripts that are differentially expressed in leaves of apple scab-resistant and susceptible cultivars of Malus domestica,” Molecular Genetics and Genomics, vol. 273, no. 4, pp. 326–335, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. S. Ziadi, P. Poupard, M.-N. Brisset, J.-P. Paulin, and P. Simoneau, “Characterization in apple leaves of two subclasses of PR-10 transcripts inducible by acibenzolar-S-methyl, a functional analogue of salicylic acid,” Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 33–43, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. P. Poupard, L. Parisi, C. Campion, S. Ziadi, and P. Simoneau, “A wound- and ethephon-inducible PR10 gene subclass from apple is differentially expressed during infection with a compatible and an incompatible race of Venturia inaequalis,” Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. J. P. Bolar, J. L. Norelli, K.-W. Wong, C. K. Hayes, G. E. Harman, and H. S. Aldwinckle, “Expression of endochitinase from Trichoderma harzianum in transgenic apple increases resistance to apple scab and reduces vigor,” Phytopathology, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 72–77, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  51. J. P. Bolar, J. L. Norelli, G. E. Harman, S. K. Brown, and H. S. Aldwinckle, “Synergistic activity of endochitinase and exochitinase from Trichoderma atroviride (T. harzianum) against the pathogenic fungus (Venturia inaequalis) in transgenic apple plants,” Transgenic Research, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 533–543, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. Faize, M. Malnoy, F. Dupuis, M. Chevalier, L. Parisi, and E. Chevreau, “Chitinases of Trichoderma atroviride induce scab resistance and some metabolic changes in two cultivars of apple,” Phytopathology, vol. 93, no. 12, pp. 1496–1504, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  53. E. Chevreau, F. Dupuis, C. Ortolan et al., “Transformation of apple for durable scab resistance, expression of a puroindoline gene in a susceptible and resistant (Vf) genotype,” Acta Horticulturae, vol. 560, pp. 323–326, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  54. M. Faize, S. Sourice, F. Dupuis, L. Parisi, M. F. Gautier, and E. Chevreau, “Expression of wheat puroindoline-b reduces scab susceptibility in transgenic apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.),” Plant Science, vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 347–354, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. H. Cao, J. Glazebrook, J. D. Clarke, S. Volko, and X. Dong, “The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene that controls systemic acquired resistance encodes a novel protein containing ankyrin repeats,” Cell, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 57–63, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  56. M. Malnoy, Q. Jin, E. E. Borejsza-Wysocka, S. Y. He, and H. S. Aldwinckle, “Overexpression of the apple MpNPR1 gene confers increased disease resistance in Malus x domestica,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1568–1580, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. J. L. Dangl and J. D. G. Jones, “Plant pathogens and integrated defense responses,” Nature, vol. 411, pp. 826–833, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  58. B. Le Cam, L. Parisi, M. Devaux et al., “Identification and characterization of molecular markers linked to the avirulence avrVg of Venturia inaequalis,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  59. G. A. L. Broggini, B. Le Cam, L. Parisi et al., “Construction of a contig of BAC clones spanning the region of the apple scab avirulence gene AvrVg,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 44–51, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. J. A. Crosby, J. Janick, P. C. Pecknold et al., “Breeding apples for scab resistance: 1945–1990,” Fruit Variety Journal, vol. 46, pp. 145–166, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  61. G. J. King, S. Tartarini, L. Brown, F. Gennari, and S. Sansavini, “Introgression of the Vf source of scab resistance and distribution of linked marker alleles within the Malus gene pool,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 1039–1046, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. L. Parisi, Y. Lespinasse, J. Guillaumes et al., “A new race of Venturia inaequalis virulent to apples with resistance due to the Vf gene,” Phytopathology, vol. 83, pp. 533–537, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  63. J. M. Soriano, S. G. Joshi, M. van Kaauwen et al., “Identification and mapping of the novel apple scab resistance gene Vd3,” Tree Genetics and Genomes, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 475–482, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. A. Patocchi, A. Frei, J. E. Frey, and M. Kellerhals, “Towards improvement of marker assisted selection of apple scab resistant cultivars: Venturia inaequalis virulence surveys and standardization of molecular marker alleles associated with resistance genes,” Molecular Breeding, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 337–347, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. V. Soufflet-Freslon, L. Gianfranceschi, A. Patocchi, and C.-E. Durel, “Inheritance studies of apple scab resistance and identification of Rvi14, a new major gene that acts together with other broad-spectrum QTL,” Genome, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 657–667, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. C.-E. Durel, “Genetic localisation of new major and minor pest and disease factors in the apple genome,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Rosaceae Genomics Conference, Napier, New Zealand, March 2006, abstract OP5. View at: Google Scholar
  67. F. S. Cheng, N. F. Weeden, S. K. Brown et al., “Development of a DNA marker for Vm, a gene conferring resistance to apple scab,” Genome, vol. 41, pp. 208–214, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  68. E. Belfanti, E. Silfverberg-Dilworth, S. Tartarini et al., “The HcrVf2 gene from a wild apple confers scab resistance to a transgenic cultivated variety,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 886–890, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. M. Xu and S. S. Korban, “A cluster of four receptor-like genes resides in the Vf locus that confers resistance to apple scab disease,” Genetics, vol. 162, no. 4, pp. 1995–2006, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  70. B. A. Vinatzer, A. Patocchi, L. Gianfranceschi et al., “Apple contains receptor-like genes homologous to the Cladosporium fulvum resistance gene family of tomato with a cluster of genes cosegregating with Vf apple scab resistance,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 508–515, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  71. I. Szankowski, S. Waidmann, J. Degenhardt et al., “Highly scab-resistant transgenic apple lines achieved by introgression of HcrVf2 controlled by different native promoter lengths,” Tree Genetics and Genomes, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 349–358, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. S. G. Joshi, J. M. Soriano, A. Kortstee et al., “Development of cisgenic apples with durable resistance to apple scab,” Acta Horticulturae, vol. 839, pp. 403–406, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  73. E. Silfverberg-Dilworth, A. Patocchi, E. Belfanti et al., “HcrVf2 introduced into Gala confers race-specific scab resistance,” in Proceedings of the Plant and Animal Genome XIII Conference, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2005, abstract P501. View at: Google Scholar
  74. R. Paris, L. Dondini, S. Tartarini, D. Bastia, V. Mantovani, and S. Sansavini, “An optimized cDNA-AFLP protocol for the identification of TDFs involved in the Malus-Venturia inaequalis interaction,” Acta Horticulturae, vol. 814, pp. 841–844, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  75. M. Komjanc, S. Festi, L. Rizzotti, L. Cattivelli, F. Cervone, and G. De Lorenzo, “A leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein kinase (LRPKm1) gene is induced in Malus x domestica by Venturia inaequalis infection and salicylic acid treatment,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 945–957, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. M. Xu and S. S. Korban, “Somatic variation plays a key role in the evolution of the Vf gene family residing in the Vf locus that confers resistance to apple scab disease,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 57–65, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. M. Malnoy, M. Xu, E. Borejsza-Wysocka, S. S. Korban, and H. S. Aldwinckle, “Two receptor-like genes, Vfa1 and Vfa2, confer resistance to the fungal pathogen Venturia inaequalis inciting apple scab disease,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 448–458, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2009 Gopaljee Jha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.