Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
Volume 2011, Article ID 312457, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/312457
Research Article

Culture Environment-Induced Pluripotency of SACK-Expanded Tissue Stem Cells

The Adult Stem Cell Technology Center and Programs in Regenerative Biology and Cancer Biology, Boston Biomedical Research Institute, 64 Grove Street, Watertown, MA 02472, USA

Received 13 July 2011; Accepted 7 September 2011

Academic Editor: Brad Upham

Copyright © 2011 Jean-François Paré and James L. Sherley. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. H. Hanna, K. Saha, and R. Jaenisch, “Pluripotency and cellular reprogramming: facts, hypotheses, unresolved issues,” Cell, vol. 143, no. 4, pp. 508–525, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. Takahashi and S. Yamanaka, “Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors,” Cell, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 663–676, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. Okita, T. Ichisaka, and S. Yamanaka, “Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells,” Nature, vol. 448, no. 7151, pp. 313–317, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Wernig, A. Meissner, R. Foreman et al., “In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state,” Nature, vol. 448, no. 7151, pp. 318–324, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Wernig, A. Meissner, J. P. Cassady, and R. Jaenisch, “c-Myc is dispensable for direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10–12, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Yu, M. A. Vodyanik, K. Smuga-Otto et al., “Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells,” Science, vol. 318, no. 5858, pp. 1917–1920, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. C. Heng, B. Feng, J. Han et al., “The nuclear receptor Nr5a2 can replace Oct4 in the reprogramming of murine somatic cells to pluripotent cells,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 167–174, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. Feng, J. Jiang, P. Kraus et al., “Reprogramming of fibroblasts into induced pluripotent stem cells with orphan nuclear receptor Esrrb,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 197–203, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. Warren, P. D. Manos, T. Ahfeldt et al., “Highly efficient reprogramming to pluripotency and directed differentiation of human cells with synthetic modified mRNA,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 618–630, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Zhou, S. Wu, J. Y. Joo et al., “Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells using recombinant proteins,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 381–384, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Kim, C. H. Kim, J. I. Moon et al., “Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by direct delivery of reprogramming proteins,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 472–476, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. Huangfu, K. Osafune, R. Maehr et al., “Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1269–1275, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. Feng, J. H. Ng, J. C. Heng, and H. H. Ng, “Molecules that promote or enhance reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 301–312, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. K. Ichida, J. Blanchard, K. Lam et al., “A small-molecule inhibitor of Tgf-β signaling replaces Sox2 in reprogramming by inducing nanog,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 491–503, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Yamanaka, “Elite and stochastic models for induced pluripotent stem cell generation,” Nature, vol. 460, no. 7251, pp. 49–52, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. B. Kim, H. Zaehres, G. Wu et al., “Pluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factors,” Nature, vol. 454, no. 7204, pp. 646–650, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. B. Kim, V. Sebastiano, G. Wu et al., “Oct4-induced pluripotency in adult neural stem cells,” Cell, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 411–419, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. J. B. Kim, B. Greber, M. J. Arazo-Bravo et al., “Direct reprogramming of human neural stem cells by Oct4,” Nature, vol. 461, no. 7264, pp. 649–653, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. L. Sherley, “Asymmetric cell kinetics genes: the key to expansion of adult stem cells in culture,” Stem Cells, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 561–572, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. F. Paré and J. L. Sherley, “Biological principles for ex vivo adult stem cell expansion,” Current Topics in Developmental Biology, vol. 73, pp. 141–171, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. S. Lee, G. G. Crane, J. R. Merok et al., “Clonal expansion of adult rat hepatic stem cell lines by suppression of asymmetric cell kinetics (SACK),” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 760–771, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. X. Ai, A. T. Do, M. Kusche-Gullberg, P. A. Labosky, and C. P. Emerson Jr., “SULF1 and SULF2 regulate heparan sulfate-mediated GDNF signaling for esophageal innervation,” Development, vol. 134, no. 18, pp. 3327–3338, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. L. Sherley, “Guanine nucleotide biosynthesis is regulated by the cellular p53 concentration,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 266, no. 36, pp. 24815–24828, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. L. Sherley, P. B. Stadler, and D. R. Johnson, “Expression of the wild-type p53 antioncogene induces guanine nucleotide- dependent stem cell division kinetics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 136–140, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y. Liu, S. A. Bohn, and J. L. Sherley, “Inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase is a rate-determining factor for p53-dependent growth regulation,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 15–28, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Jardim, S. E. Bergeson, S. Shih et al., “Xanthine phosphoribosyltransferase from Leishmania donovani. Molecular cloning, biochemical characterization, and genetic analysis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 48, pp. 34403–34410, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Ramalho-Santos, S. Yoon, Y. Matsuzaki, R. C. Mulligan, and D. A. Melton, “Stemness: transcriptional profiling of embryonic and adult stem cells,” Science, vol. 298, no. 5593, pp. 597–600, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. N. B. Ivanova, J. T. Dimos, C. Schaniel, J. A. Hackney, K. A. Moore, and I. R. Lemischka, “A stem cell molecutar signature,” Science, vol. 298, no. 5593, pp. 601–604, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. Hong, K. Takahashi, T. Ichisaka et al., “Suppression of induced pluripotent stem cell generation by the p53-p21 pathway,” Nature, vol. 460, no. 7259, pp. 1132–1135, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. Kawamura, J. Suzuki, Y. V. Wang et al., “Linking the p53 tumour suppressor pathway to somatic cell reprogramming,” Nature, vol. 460, no. 7259, pp. 1140–1144, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Utikal, J. M. Polo, M. Stadtfeld et al., “Immortalization eliminates a roadblock during cellular reprogramming into iPS cells,” Nature, vol. 460, no. 7259, pp. 1145–1148, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. M. Marión, K. Strati, H. Li et al., “A p53-mediated DNA damage response limits reprogramming to ensure iPS cell genomic integrity,” Nature, vol. 460, no. 7259, pp. 1149–1153, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. Pease, P. Braghetta, D. Gearing, D. Grail, and R. L. Williams, “Isolation of embryonic stem (ES) cells in media supplemented with recombinant leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF),” Developmental Biology, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 344–352, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. H. Ohlsson, K. Karlsson, and T. Edlund, “IPF1, a homeodomain-containing transactivator of the insulin gene,” EMBO Journal, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 4251–4259, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. E. Szabo, S. Rampalli, R. M. Risueño et al., “Direct conversion of human fibroblasts to multilineage blood progenitors,” Nature, vol. 468, no. 7323, pp. 521–526, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J. A. Efe, S. Hilcove, J. Kim et al., “Conversion of mouse fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes using a direct reprogramming strategy,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 215–222, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. S. Yamanaka, “Strategies and new developments in the generation of patient-specific pluripotent stem cells,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–49, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. L. Sherley, “Guanine nucleotide biosynthesis is regulated by the cellular p53 concentration,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 266, no. 36, pp. 24815–24828, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. E. Baker, N. J. Harrison, E. Maltby et al., “Adaptation to culture of human embryonic stem cells and oncogenesis in vivo,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 207–215, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. Maitra, D. E. Arking, N. Shivapurkar et al., “Genomic alterations in cultured human embryonic stem cells,” Nature Genetics, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1099–1103, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. Y. Mayshar, U. Ben-David, N. Lavon et al., “Identification and classification of chromosomal aberrations in human induced pluripotent stem cells,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 521–531, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. L. C. Laurent, I. Ulitsky, I. Slavin et al., “Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 106–118, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar