Research Article

Investigation of Antimicrobial Activity and Statistical Optimization of Bacillus subtilis SPB1 Biosurfactant Production in Solid-State Fermentation

Table 3

Antibacterial, antifungal, and antiyeast activities of the crude biosurfactant at different concentrations (0.5–2 g/L).

MicroorganismsZone of inhibition diameter (mm)
0.5 g/L1 g/L2 g/L

Bacteria
 Staphylococcus aureus f19 ± 123 ± 228 ± 2
 Escherichia coli d12 ± 115 ± 119 ± 1
 Salmonella typhimirium a08 ± 111 ± 213 ± 2
 Pseudomonas aeruginosa a08 ± 110 ± 112 ± 1
 Enterococcus faecalis e14 ± 218 ± 120 ± 2
 Klebsiella pneumoniae c,d12 ± 115 ± 118 ± 1
 Enterobacter cloacae b,c11 ± 113 ± 115 ± 1
 Enterobacter faecium b10 ± 113 ± 115 ± 1
 Brevibacterium flavum b,c,d11 ± 113 ± 116 ± 1
 Pseudomonas stutzeri a07 ± 209 ± 212 ± 2
 Staphylococcus xyloxus e16 ± 1219 ± 223 ± 2
 Penicillium notatum 09 ± 114 ± 119 ± 1

Fungi
 Alternaria alternata
 Penicillium italicum11 ± 115 ± 120 ± 1
 Puccinia allii
 Peronospora destructor
 Aspergillus oryzae03 ± 206 ± 209 ± 2
 Aspergillus niger10 ± 1214 ± 218 ± 2
 Rhizopus oryzae04 ± 107 ± 109 ± 2
 Candida albicans18 ± 221 ± 225 ± 2

— = no inhibition.
Different letters indicates the difference between two means is statistically significant ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 ).