BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 834598 |

Eva Van Meervenne, Els Van Coillie, Frederiek-Maarten Kerckhof, Frank Devlieghere, Lieve Herman, Leen S. P. De Gelder, Eva M. Top, Nico Boon, "Strain-Specific Transfer of Antibiotic Resistance from an Environmental Plasmid to Foodborne Pathogens", BioMed Research International, vol. 2012, Article ID 834598, 8 pages, 2012.

Strain-Specific Transfer of Antibiotic Resistance from an Environmental Plasmid to Foodborne Pathogens

Academic Editor: Jozef Anné
Received22 Feb 2012
Accepted19 Apr 2012
Published27 Jun 2012


Pathogens resistant to multiple antibiotics are rapidly emerging, entailing important consequences for human health. This study investigated if the broad-host-range multiresistance plasmid pB10, isolated from a wastewater treatment plant, harbouring amoxicillin, streptomycin, sulfonamide, and tetracycline resistance genes, was transferable to the foodborne pathogens Salmonella spp. or E. coli O157:H7 and how this transfer alters the phenotype of the recipients. The transfer ratio was determined by both plating and flow cytometry. Antibiotic resistance profiles were determined for both recipients and transconjugants using the disk diffusion method. For 14 of the 15 recipient strains, transconjugants were detected. Based on plating, transfer ratios were between 6 . 8 × 1 0 9 and 3 . 0 × 1 0 2 while using flow cytometry, transfer ratios were between < 1 . 0 × 1 0 5 and 1 . 9 × 1 0 2 . With a few exceptions, the transconjugants showed phenotypically increased resistance, indicating that most of the transferred resistance genes were expressed. In summary, we showed that an environmental plasmid can be transferred into foodborne pathogenic bacteria at high transfer ratios. However, the transfer ratio seemed to be recipient strain dependent. Moreover, the newly acquired resistance genes could turn antibiotic susceptible strains into resistant ones, paving the way to compromise human health.

1. Introduction

The extensive use of antibiotics in human and veterinary medicine and its prophylactic and growth promoting use in agriculture and aquaculture have lead to a huge rise of antibiotic resistant bacteria [13] and an increase of antibiotic resistant genes in the horizontal gene pool.

Antibiotic resistance in bacteria can be intrinsic or acquired. In the case of intrinsic resistance, bacterial strains are inherently resistant to a certain compound and the resistance cannot be transferred horizontally [4]. Acquired resistance occurs by mutation and/or horizontal gene transfer events. The main mechanisms of horizontal gene transfer are conjugation (mobile genetic elements are being transferred from a donor to a recipient cell), transformation (uptake of naked DNA), and transduction (bacteriophages as transporters of genetic information). Conjugation is considered as the principal mode for antibiotic resistance transfer since many antibiotic resistance genes are situated on mobile elements, such as plasmids and conjugative transposons. Conjugation of broad-host-range plasmids enables DNA to be transferred over genus and species borders, whereas transformation and transduction are usually more limited to the same species [5]. When considering a medical point of view, the transfer of antibiotic resistance determinants from environmental bacteria to pathogens is of utmost importance, and it is clear that environmental bacteria should not be seen as devoid of antibiotic resistance determinants because of the physical distance between these bacteria and clinical settings [6]. A recent study suggests that infected patients might enhance the spread of plasmid-encoded fitness, virulence and antibiotic resistance determinants as inflammation elicits concomitant Salmonella and E. coli blooms, which can strongly raise donor and acceptor densities in the gut, thereby boosting horizontal gene transfer [7].

The aim of this study was to investigate if an environmental multiresistance plasmid can be transferred to two model Gram-negative foodborne pathogens, that are, Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli O157:H7. It is generally agreed that Gram-negative bacteria pose the greatest risk to public health as the increase in resistance of Gram-negative bacteria is faster than in Gram-positive bacteria and as there are fewer new and developmental antibiotics active against Gram-negative bacteria [8].

To determine the transfer ratio, the transconjugants were analysed by both plating and flow cytometry (gfp as the reporter gene) [911]. Furthermore, the extent to which their phenotype was influenced was analysed by determining the antibiotic resistance profiles against five antibiotics for the recipients and the transconjugants.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains, Plasmid, and Growth Conditions

The plasmid donor strain was Pseudomonas putida strain SM1443, a KT2442 (SM1315) strain with the mini-Tn5- 𝑙 𝑎 𝑐 𝐼 q cassette inserted into the chromosome [12]. The 𝑙 𝑎 𝑐 𝐼 q repressor cassette prevented the expression of the gfp gene in the donor.

The plasmid used in this study was the broad-host-range plasmid pB10. This plasmid, belonging to the IncP-1 𝛽 subgroup, was isolated from a wastewater treatment plant and contains resistance to the antibiotic agents amoxicillin, streptomycin, sulfonamides, and tetracycline and to inorganic mercury ions [13]. To mark the plasmid with a gfp gene and a kanamycin resistance gene (Km), insertion of the mini-Tn5-Km- P A 1 - 0 4 / 0 3 ::gfp cassette was performed in two steps. First, a triparental mating was performed in which the helper plasmid RK600 [14], present in Escherichia coli HB101, mobilised the delivery plasmid pJBA120, containing the mini-Tn5 cassette, from the donor E. coli MV1190( 𝜆 -pir) [15], into the rifampicin-resistant recipient Pseudomonas putida UWC1 harbouring pB10. P. putida UWC1 derivatives with the mini-Tn5-Km- P A 1 - 0 4 / 0 3 ::gfp cassette inserted either in the chromosome or in pB10 were obtained by selection in Luria Bertani (LB) broth (10 g tryptone, 5 g yeast extract, and 5 g NaCl per litre) with 10  𝜇 g tetracycline mL−1, 50  𝜇 g kanamycin mL−1, and 100  𝜇 g rifampicin mL−1. In the second step, gfp-marked plasmids were obtained by mating the P. putida UWC1 derivatives with Ralstonia eutropha JMP228n [16]. Selection on LB agar plates with 10  𝜇 g tetracycline mL−1, 50  𝜇 g kanamycin mL−1, and 100  𝜇 g nalidixic acid mL−1 resulted in JMP228n clones carrying pB10 containing a randomly inserted mini-Tn5-Km- P A 1 - 0 4 / 0 3 ::gfp cassette. Subsequently, one clone, designated JMP228n (pB10::gfp), was mated with E. coli K12 to obtain E. coli K12 (pB10::gfp) after selection on LB agar plates with 10  𝜇 g tetracycline mL−1 and 50  𝜇 g kanamycin mL−1 at 43°C. Ultimately, this strain was mated with P. putida SM1443 to obtain the donor strain for the experiments, P. putida SM1443 (pB10::gfp), after selection on LB agar plates with 10  𝜇 g tetracycline mL−1, 100  𝜇 g rifampicin mL−1, and 50  𝜇 g kanamycin mL−1 at 28°C.

The recipient strains were 10 Salmonella spp. and five E. coli O157:H7 strains (Table 1). The tested Salmonella serovars belong to the most frequently occurring Salmonella serotypes in human salmonellosis in Europe, with Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium being the most frequent [17]. None of the five E. coli O157:H7 strains carried stx1 and stx2 genes. For one strain (LFMFP 476), no additional information on the presence of other virulence genes was available, but the four other strains all carried the eae and ehx genes (data not shown).


MB 1139SalmonellaEnteritidisPoultry
MB 1410SalmonellaEnteritidisEgg
MB 1561SalmonellaEnteritidisPoultry (transport)
MB 2264SalmonellaTyphimuriumHuman
MB 2265SalmonellaTyphimuriumHuman
MB 2272SalmonellaTyphimuriumHuman
MB 2292SalmonellaTyphimuriumHuman
MB 1641SalmonellaHadarPoultry (cecal drop)
KS 1-1SalmonellaInfantisPoultry (house)
KS 87SalmonellaVirchowPoultry (house)
MB 3885Escherichia coliO157:H7Beef (carpaccio)
MB 3890Escherichia coliO157:H7Human
MB 4021Escherichia coliO157:H7Bovine (carcass)
MB 4260Escherichia coliO157:H7Nonhuman
LFMFP 476Escherichia coliO157:H7Bovine (faeces)

The recipient strains were first tested on their inability to grow on kanamycin (50  𝜇 g mL−1) containing plates as this antibiotic was used as selective marker to detect transconjugants harbouring pB10::gfp.

Donor and recipient strains were all grown in LB broth. For all solid media, 1.5% agar was added. P. putida was incubated at 28°C, Salmonella spp. and E. coli at 37°C. To maintain the plasmid in the donor and the transconjugants 50  𝜇 g kanamycin mL−1 was added to the medium.

2.2. Filter Mating

Mating experiments were conducted in triplicate on 0.22 μm polycarbonate filters (25 mm diameter) (Whatman, UK). The donor and recipient cultures were grown overnight and washed twice with sterile saline (0.85% NaCl) to remove antibiotics. The OD610 nm was adjusted to 0.25–0.35 (approximately 108 cells mL−1) for both donor and recipient strains. Seventy-five 𝜇 L of both donor and recipient was diluted in 2 mL of sterile saline and distributed evenly over the filter using a Swinnex device (Millipore, USA). The filters were transferred to LB agar plates and incubated overnight at 28°C. Afterwards, the filters were submerged in 5 mL sterile saline and vortexed twice for 1 min. The suspended bacteria were analysed by plate counting and by flow cytometry. For the plate counting, LB plates, which contained kanamycin, were incubated at 42°C. The presence of the antibiotic counter selected for the recipient strain, while the high temperature counter selected for the donor strain. The transfer ratio was determined as the number of transconjugant CFU per total cell count (donor, recipient and transconjugant cells), as determined by flow cytometry.

2.3. Flow Cytometry Analysis

Diluted bacteria were detected and quantified with a Cyan ADP Flow Cytometer (Dako, Denmark), using the 488 nm laser. The dilution factor ranged from 1000 to 2500. Dilutions were made with filter sterilized Evian water. Each sample consisted of 980  𝜇 L of the diluted sample, 10  𝜇 L Na2EDTA (500 mM, pH8), and 10  𝜇 L Dako Cytocount beads. These beads were used to determine the cell concentration. FL1 fluorescence emission was collected with a photomultiplier tube using a 530/40 emission filter, for FL2 fluorescence a 575/25 emission filter was used and side scatter light (SSC) was collected using a 488/10 emission filter. The sheath fluid consisted of Milli-Q water. The threshold trigger was set to SSC. The analysis of a sample was done by collecting data for 100 000 events in threefold. Summit v4.3 software was used to process the results. Pure cultures of donor, recipient, and transconjugant were analysed by flow cytometry to set the gates that distinguish between the transconjugant population and the donor and recipient population on a FL1 versus FL2 plot. When the transconjugants of a specific filter mating sample could not clearly be visually detected on the plot, their number was considered to be below the detection limit (< 1 × 1 0 5 transconjugants per total cells). The transfer ratio was determined as the number of transconjugant cells per total cell count.

2.4. Antibiotic Susceptibility Screening

The antibiotic susceptibility of the recipients and transconjugants was determined by using the disk diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines for five antibiotics (amoxicillin, kanamycin, streptomycin, sulfonamides, and tetracycline) [18]. The visual turbidity of the bacterial isolates was adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland standard in sterile saline. The suspension was plated on a Mueller-Hinton agar plate (Oxoid, UK) and antibiotic disks (Oxoid) were applied on the plate. Inhibition zone diameters were measured after incubating the plates during 16–18 h at 37°C. Classification as “susceptible”, “intermediate resistant” or “resistant” was based on the inhibition zone diameters according to CLSI guidelines. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as quality control strain to monitor the performance of the susceptibility testing.

2.5. Molecular Confirmation of Plasmid Transfer

Transfer of the plasmid pB10::gfp was confirmed by PCR. DNA from the recipient and transconjugant strains was obtained by an alkaline lysis method. For each strain, a few bacterial colonies were suspended in 1 mL Ringer solution. After centrifuging the sample for two minutes at 14000  𝑔 , 100  𝜇 L sterile water was added to the pellet. The samples were incubated for 15 minutes at 90°C and subsequently centrifuged for one minute at 14000  𝑔 . Fifty 𝜇 L of the supernatant was kept at −20°C.

The PCR reaction was performed with the primers trfA_fw and trfA_rev to amplify a 281 bp fragment of the replication initiation gene trfA, encoded by the plasmid, as previously described [19]. These primers are specific for plasmids belonging to the IncP-1 𝛼 , 𝛽 , 𝜀 subgroups. The PCR amplification products were detected by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel in TAE buffer and visualised by ethidium bromide staining.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of the Recipient Strains

Before starting the conjugation experiments, the antibiotic susceptibility profiles of the recipient strains and presence of IncP-1 𝛼 , 𝛽 , 𝜀 plasmids were determined (Table 2). The three Salmonella Enteritidis strains were susceptible to the tested antibiotics, except one (MB 1139), which displayed an intermediate resistance to kanamycin. There was much more variation in the antibiotic susceptibility profiles of the Salmonella Typhimurium strains. The Salmonella Typhimurium strain MB 2264 was resistant to the four antibiotics which are indigenous to the plasmid but susceptible to kanamycin, while Salmonella Typhimurium strain MB 2265 was susceptible to all the antibiotics. The two other Salmonella Typhimurium strains (MB 2272 and MB 2292) showed resistance to, respectively, one (amoxicillin) and two antibiotics (amoxicillin and sulfonamides). The Salmonella Hadar strain MB 1641 was susceptible to kanamycin and sulfonamides. The strains of Salmonella Infantis KS 1-1 and Salmonella Virchow KS 87 were susceptible to all five antibiotics. All the recipient E. coli strains were susceptible to the antibiotics tested, except strain MB 3890 which was intermediate resistant to streptomycin.


Salmonella Enteritidis (MB 1139)17*28*15*20*23*
Salmonella Enteritidis (MB 1410)20<7207171320<721<7
Salmonella Enteritidis (MB 1561)21<7277181322<722<7
Salmonella Typhimurium
(MB 2264)
Salmonella Typhimurium
(MB 2265)
Salmonella Typhimurium
(MB 2272)
Salmonella Typhimurium
(MB 2292)
Salmonella Hadar (MB 1641)18*<7*9*21*<7*
Salmonella Infantis (KS 1-1)19<7257151219<719<7
Salmonella Virchow (KS 87)19<7267151221<720<7
E. coli O157:H7 (MB 3885)21<7227161324<722<7
E. coli O157:H7 (MB 3890)18<7217141424<720<7
E. coli O157:H7 (MB 4021)21<7217181524<721<7
E. coli O157:H7 (MB 4260)19<7207151324<720<7
E. coli O157:H7 (LFMFP 476)19<72211151424<721<7

Bold: considered as resistant according to CLSI guidelines.
Italic: considered as intermediate resistant according to CLSI guidelines.
*: no transconjugants obtained.

The absence of IncP-1 𝛼 , 𝛽 , 𝜀 plasmids in the recipient strains was confirmed by PCR as in none of the 15 recipient strains a PCR fragment of 281 bp, specific for IncP-1 𝛼 , 𝛽 , 𝜀 plasmids, was detected (data not shown).

3.2. Plasmid Transfer Analysed by Plating

Suspensions, obtained after filter mating, were plated on LB plates supplemented with kanamycin and incubated at 42°C. Transconjugants were obtained for 13 of the 15 tested strains (Figure 1). The strains that did not yield transconjugants were Salmonella Enteritidis MB 1139 and Salmonella Hadar MB 1641. Repetition of the conjugation experiments confirmed these results (data not shown). The other Salmonella spp. strains resulted in transfer ratios ranging from 3 . 7 × 1 0 7 to 3 . 0 × 1 0 2 transconjugants per total cell count. The highest transfer ratios were found for the two remaining Salmonella Enteritidis strains (MB 1561: 3 . 0 × 1 0 2 ; MB 1410: 9 . 1 × 1 0 4 ), followed by Salmonella Virchow KS 87 ( 7 . 2 × 1 0 4 ) and Salmonella Infantis KS 1-1 ( 9 . 2 × 1 0 5 ) , while the lowest transfer ratios were observed for the Salmonella Typhimurium strains, with transfer ratios in the order of 10−7. For MB 2265 a transfer ratio of 1.9 × 10−5 was observed, which was the fifth highest transfer ratio found for the Salmonella spp. strains tested. One of the E. coli strains (MB 3890) had a similar transfer ratio as some Salmonella spp. strains (2.2 × 10−5), while the other four E. coli strains had much lower transfer ratios (10−8–10−9).

3.3. Plasmid Transfer Analysed by Flow Cytometry

The conjugation efficiency was also assessed by flow cytometry, because this method allowed a rapid and culture-independent screening of the individual transconjugant and parental cells. Using the same mating mixtures as described above, transconjugants could be detected for only 5 of the 15 tested strains, due to the rather poor detection limit (Figure 1). These strains were all Salmonella spp., more specifically Salmonella Enteritidis (MB 1561: 1.9 × 10−2; MB 1139: 2.5 × 10−4, MB 1410: 1.9 × 10−4), Salmonella Virchow (1.5 × 10−4), and Salmonella Infantis (1.2 × 10−4). No transconjugants could be obtained by plating for Salmonella Enteritidis MB 1139, while the four other strains showed the highest transfer ratio determined by plating. For the 10 other strains the transfer ratio was below the detection limit (<1 × 10−5 transconjugants per total cell count). This is consistent with the low transfer ratios obtained by plating (10−5–10−9).

3.4. Characterization of the Transconjugants

To confirm that plasmid transfer had occurred and to analyse which effect this transfer had on the phenotype, the presence of the plasmid in the transconjugants and the antibiotic resistance profiles of the transconjugants were examined. Transconjugants were obtained for 13 of the 15 tested strains by plating (Table 2). As expected, the transconjugants were all resistant to kanamycin (inhibition zone diameter <7 mm). The inhibition zone diameter of sulfonamides and tetracycline was less than 7 mm for all the transconjugants, meaning that they were all completely resistant to these compounds. For amoxicillin the inhibition zone diameter was 7 mm or less, except for E. coli LFMFP 476 for which the inhibition zone diameter was 11 mm. This value is still considered as resistant according to CLSI guidelines. The decrease in inhibition zone diameter was less pronounced for streptomycin. According to the CLSI guidelines 11 of the transconjugant strains are considered to be intermediate resistant to streptomycin, one E. coli strain (MB 4021) remained susceptible. Salmonella Typhimurium MB 2264 was already resistant to amoxicillin, streptomycin, sulfonamides, and tetracycline before conjugation. Phenotypically, this strain gained only the resistance to kanamycin upon conjugation.

The presence of the pB10 plasmid in the transconjugants was confirmed by PCR. While none of the recipient strains contained the fragment (see above), the transconjugant strains all showed a clear band of the expected size after gel electrophoresis (data not shown).

4. Discussion

This study demonstrated that the broad-host-range plasmid pB10, carrying multiple resistance genes, could be transferred to foodborne pathogens under laboratory conditions and that this event made the recipient strains antibiotic resistant. The results show that the antibiotic resistance genes present in the general horizontal gene pool can be transferred from environmental strains to pathogenic organisms, but that the transfer ratio is dependent on the recipient strain. The role of natural environments in the evolution of resistance traits in pathogenic bacteria has recently been reviewed [20]. Other studies examined the conjugation between food related (pathogenic) bacteria [2124], but to our knowledge there are fewer studies describing the transfer from environmental strains to (foodborne) pathogens [2527].

In this study high transfer ratios were encountered with the highest transfer ratio in the Salmonella Enteritidis strain MB 1561 (order of magnitude of 10−2). The plasmid used in this study, pB10, is a broad-host-range plasmid that could be transferred between laboratory strains of Pseudomonas and E. coli, and from Pseudomonas to Sinorhizobium meliloti at high transfer ratios with an order of magnitude of 10−1 transconjugants per recipient cells [13]. Four out of five E. coli 0157:H7 recipient strains showed lower transfer ratios than those observed for the Salmonella spp. strains. Recently, a study was published describing the dissemination of NDM-1-positive bacteria in the New Delhi environment and its implications for human health [27]. NDM-1-positive isolates containing the 𝑏 𝑙 𝑎 N D M - 1 gene were circulating in New Delhi as early as 2006 and plasmids carrying the gene can have up to 14 other antibiotic resistance determinants. These authors found the presence of the 𝑏 𝑙 𝑎 N D M - 1 gene in nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria, like P. putida, which were not previously reported to carry this gene. The transfer of 𝑏 𝑙 𝑎 N D M - 1 was examined from bacteria, isolated from waste seepage, to the nonpathogenic E. coli J53 and to clinical strains of Salmonella Enteritidis and Shigella sonnei. Transfer into the Salmonella Enteritidis and Shigella sonnei recipients was 10 to 1000 times less efficient than into the E. coli J53 lab strain. In our study, transfer was more efficient in the Salmonella spp. strains than in the E. coli strains. It has been demonstrated that the donor affects the host range of pB10 in an activated-sludge microbial community [16], and it has been posed that in general all conditions influencing the host, including the genetic background of the host, might also influence the frequency of plasmid transfer by conjugation [28].

For all strains, except for Salmonella Hadar, transconjugants could be detected by plating and/or by flow cytometry. Other studies also showed that Salmonella Hadar is less receptive for mobile genetic elements than other Salmonella serovars [29, 30]. It could be that in Salmonella Hadar a yet unexplained mechanism blocks the acquisition of plasmid DNA by conjugation [30].

Two methods were used in this study for the detection of transconjugants: a cultivation-dependent (plating) and a cultivation-independent method (flow cytometry). The most important advantages of flow cytometry are that it provides a rapid screening of bacterial cultures, takes into account the nonculturable fraction of the bacteria, and is less labour intensive than plating. Other studies used flow cytometry in combination with evolutionary algorithms to determine the optimal parameters for transconjugant formation [9] or in combination with automated cell sorting of green fluorescent transconjugant cells [31]. This approach allowed them to identify the transconjugants [31]. However, in our study the detection limit was rather high, so rare events could not be observed. For five of the 15 analysed strains transconjugants could be detected by flow cytometry. With plating, transconjugants were detected for 13 of the 15 analysed strains. There was one strain (Salmonella Enteritidis MB 1139) for which transconjugants only could be detected by flow cytometry and not by plating, even after repeated conjugation experiments. In some cases transconjugants cannot be detected by cultivation because the cells enter into a viable-but-nonculturable (VBNC) state [9]. In a previous study, a strain-dependent influence of temperature on the VBNC state was found [32]. These authors found a different temperature influence for plasmid-bearing cells and plasmid-free cells of two Pseudomonas strains, which was not seen in an E. coli strain. Whenever no transconjugants were detected by flow cytometry in our study, the transfer ratios determined by plating were lower than or just around 10−5. These findings indicate that although flow cytometry offers many advantages, it is not always the method of choice due to its high detection limit.

In the last step of this study, the antibiotic resistance profiles of the transconjugants were determined to verify whether the recipient phenotype was altered by receiving the plasmid. Transconjugants were obtained for 13 of the 15 analysed strains. All these transconjugants showed a decrease in inhibition zone diameter for kanamycin, indicating that they all expressed the kanamycin resistance gene. For the plasmid-encoded antibiotic resistances, the strains showed complete resistance against amoxicillin, sulfonamides, and tetracycline. For streptomycin, only slight or no decreases in inhibition zone diameter were observed, resulting in intermediate resistant strains. E. coli MB 4021 remained susceptible according to CLSI guidelines although there was a decrease in inhibition zone diameter. Even though there can be a fair to almost perfect agreement between the measurement of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and the assessment of resistance genes, situations occur in which susceptible isolates carry the corresponding resistance genes [33]. These resistance genes may not be expressed if they are distant from the promoter or if they are associated with a weak promoter in an integron. The same occurs with free gene cassettes which are not incorporated into an integron and lack the integron promoter which is required for expression [33]. An alternative explanation could be a low MIC test sensitivity as is known with aadA genes and streptomycin resistance [33, 34]. A poor agreement was found between genotypes and phenotypes for streptomycin (66% agreement) in a previous study [35]. In the majority of cases, this disagreement was due to the presence of an aadA gene in isolates classified as susceptible to streptomycin. The streptomycin resistance in pB10 is situated on a truncated Tn5393c streptomycin resistance transposon. This transposon contains the strA and strB genes, which encode the two different streptomycin-resistance proteins aminoglycoside-3′-phosphotransferase and aminoglycoside-6-phosphotransferase [36]. The association of strA and strB normally leads to high-level expression of streptomycin resistance [35, 37]. At the moment, it is not clear to us why the streptomycin resistance was not fully expressed.

5. Conclusion

In this paper, we demonstrate that an environmental plasmid was transferred to foodborne pathogens (Salmonella spp. and E. coli O157:H7) under laboratory conditions. The detection of transconjugants was done by flow cytometry and by plating. Not only does this transfer occur at rather high transfer ratios (order of magnitude 10−2), but the acquisition of the plasmid also makes the pathogens resistant to multiple antibiotics. In worst case scenarios, infections with these plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistant pathogens can lead to exacerbation of the patient’s condition, treatment failure and thus compromise human health. Therefore, it is important to know if these plasmids can be transferred to potential pathogens and if these antibiotic resistance genes can be expressed in the new hosts.


This study was funded by the Federal Public Service of Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment (Contract RF 6219). E. M. Top was in part supported by NIH Grant R01AI084918 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The authors thank Siska Maertens and Tim Lacoere for the technical assistance. The authors thank Karen De Roy, Sam Van Nevel and Massimo Marzorati for their detailed review of the paper.


  1. D. H. Hamer and C. J. Gill, “From the farm to the kitchen table: the negative impact of antimicrobial use in animals on humans,” Nutrition Reviews, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 261–264, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. F. C. Cabello, “Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: a growing problem for human and animal health and for the environment,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1137–1144, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. Walsh and S. Fanning, “Antimicrobial resistance in foodborne pathogens—a cause for concern?” Current Drug Targets, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 808–815, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. Fajardo, N. Martínez-Martín, M. Mercadillo et al., “The neglected intrinsic resistome of bacterial pathogens,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 2, Article ID e1619, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Mathur and R. Singh, “Antibiotic resistance in food lactic acid bacteria—a review,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 281–295, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. E. Moore, J. R. Rao, P. J. A. Moore et al., “Determination of total antibiotic resistance in waterborne bacteria in rivers and streams in Northern Ireland: can antibiotic-resistant bacteria be an indicator of ecological change?” Aquatic Ecology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 349–358, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. B. Stecher, R. Denzler, L. Maier et al., “Gut inflammation can boost horizontal gene transfer between pathogenic and commensal Enterobacteriaceae,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 1269–1274, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. K. K. Kumarasamy, M. A. Toleman, T. R. Walsh et al., “Emergence of a new antibiotic resistance mechanism in India, Pakistan, and the UK: a molecular, biological, and epidemiological study,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 597–602, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. N. Boon, S. Depuydt, and W. Verstraete, “Evolutionary algorithms and flow cytometry to examine the parameters influencing transconjugant formation,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 17–27, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. J. Sørensen, A. H. Sørensen, L. H. Hansen, G. Oregaard, and D. Veal, “Direct detection and quantification of horizontal gene transfer by using flow cytometry and gfp as a reporter gene,” Current Microbiology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 129–133, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. J. Sørensen, M. Bailey, L. H. Hansen, N. Kroer, and S. Wuertz, “Studying plasmid horizontal transfer in situ: a critical review,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 700–710, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. A. J. Haagensen, S. K. Hansen, T. Johansen, and S. Molin, “In situ detection of horizontal transfer of mobile genetic elements,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 261–268, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Dröge, A. Pühler, and W. Selbitschka, “Phenotypic and molecular characterization of conjugative antibiotic resistance plasmids isolated from bacterial communities of activated sludge,” Molecular and General Genetics, vol. 263, no. 3, pp. 471–482, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. B. Kessler, V. de Lorenzo, and K. N. Timmis, “A general system to integrate lacZ fusions into the chromosomes of gram-negative eubacteria: regulation of the Pm promoter of the TOL plasmid studied with all controlling elements in monocopy,” Molecular and General Genetics, vol. 233, no. 1-2, pp. 293–301, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. B. Andersen, C. Sternberg, L. K. Poulsen, S. P. Bjørn, M. Givskov, and S. Molin, “New unstable variants of green fluorescent protein for studies of transient gene expression in bacteria,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2240–2246, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  16. L. De Gelder, F. P. J. Vandecasteele, C. J. Brown, L. J. Forney, and E. M. Top, “Plasmid donor affects host range of promiscuous IncP-1β plasmid pB10 in an activated-sludge microbial community,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 5309–5317, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), “The Community Summary Report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in the European Union in 2008,” EFSA Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 410, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), “Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing,” CLSI document M02-A10, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pa, USA, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  19. M. I. Bahl, M. Burmølle, A. Meisner, L. H. Hansen, and S. J. Sørensen, “All IncP-1 plasmid subgroups, including the novel ε subgroup, are prevalent in the influent of a Danish wastewater treatment plant,” Plasmid, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 134–139, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. L. Martinez, “The role of natural environments in the evolution of resistance traits in pathogenic bacteria,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 276, no. 1667, pp. 2521–2530, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Pourshaban, A. M. Ferrini, V. Mannoni, B. Oliva, and P. Aureli, “Transferable tetracycline resistance in Listeria monocytogenes from food in Italy,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 564–566, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  22. D. Gevers, G. Huys, and J. Swings, “In vitro conjugal transfer of tetracycline resistance from Lactobacillus isolates to other Gram-positive bacteria,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 225, no. 1, pp. 125–130, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. A. S. Mc Mahon, I. S. Blair, J. E. Moore, and D. A. Mc Dowell, “The rate of horizontal transmission of antibiotic resistance plasmids is increased in food preservation-stressed bacteria,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 1883–1888, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. N. Toomey, A. Monaghan, S. Fanning, and D. J. Bolton, “Assessment of antimicrobial resistance transfer between lactic acid bacteria and potential foodborne pathogens using in vitro methods and mating in a food matrix,” Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 925–933, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. S. Bruun, A. S. Schmidt, I. Dalsgaard, and J. L. Larsen, “Conjugal transfer of large plasmids conferring oxytetracycline (OTC) resistance: transfer between environmental aeromonads, fish-pathogenic bacteria, and Escherichia coli,” Journal of Aquatic Animal Health, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 69–79, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. V. M. D'Costa, K. M. McGrann, D. W. Hughes, and G. D. Wright, “Sampling the antibiotic resistome,” Science, vol. 311, no. 5759, pp. 374–377, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. T. R. Walsh, J. Weeks, D. M. Livermore, and M. A. Toleman, “Dissemination of NDM-1 positive bacteria in the New Delhi environment and its implications for human health: an environmental point prevalence study,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 355–362, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. G. Koraimann, “Bacterial conjugation: cell-cell contact-dependent horizontal gene spread,” in Microbial Evolution: Gene Establishment, Survival, and Exchange, R. V. Miller and M. J. Day, Eds., pp. 111–124, ASM Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  29. R. Franiczek, B. Krzyżanowska, I. Dolna, and G. Mokracka-Latajka, “Conjugative transfer of plasmid-mediated CTX-M-type β-lactamases from clinical strains of Enterobacteriaceae to Salmonella enterica serovars,” Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 313–322, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  30. J. Sarowska, Z. Drulis-Kawa, K. Guz, S. Jankowski, and D. Wojnicz, “Conjugative transfer of plasmid encoding extended-spectrum beta-lactamase to recipient Salmonella strains,” Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 63–70, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  31. S. Musovic, G. Oregaard, N. Kroer, and S. J. Sørensen, “Cultivation-independent examination of horizontal transfer and host range of an IncP-1 plasmid among gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria indigenous to the barley rhizosphere,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 6687–6692, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. D. Oliver, D. McDougald, T. Barrett, L. A. Glover, and J. I. Prosser, “Effect of temperature and plasmid carriage on nonculturability in organisms targeted for release,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 229–237, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. L. B. Rosengren, C. L. Waldner, and R. J. Reid-Smith, “Associations between antimicrobial resistance phenotypes, antimicrobial resistance genes, and virulence genes of fecal Escherichia coli isolates from healthy grow-finish pigs,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 1373–1380, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Sunde and M. Norström, “The genetic background for streptomycin resistance in Escherichia coli influences the distribution of MICs,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 87–90, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. P. Boerlin, R. Travis, C. L. Gyles et al., “Antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes of Escherichia coli isolates from swine in Ontario,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 6753–6761, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. Schlüter, H. Heuer, R. Szczepanowski et al., “The 64 508 bp IncP-1 β antibiotic multiresistance plasmid pB10 isolated from a waste-water treatment plant provides evidence for recombination between members of different branches of the IncP-1 β group,” Microbiology, vol. 149, no. 11, pp. 3139–3153, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  37. C. S. Chiou and A. L. Jones, “Expression and identification of the strA-strB gene pair from streptomycin-resistant Erwinia amylovora,” Gene, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 47–51, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Eva Van Meervenne et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.