Research Article
An Efficient Ensemble Learning Method for Gene Microarray Classification
Table 4
Mean classification accuracy of each classification method against 8 different gene datasets.
| Dataset | ICA-based RotBoost | Single Tree | Rotation Forest | AdaBoost | Bagging | SVMs |
| Colon | 96.10 ± 0.59 | 93.80 ± 0.82• | 95.21 ± 0.43• | 94.97 ± 0.63• | 94.92 ± 0.50• | 96.13 ± 0.12 | CNS | 95.00 ± 0.28 | 89.92 ± 0.61• | 92.37 ± 0.83• | 95.09 ± 0.64 | 93.50 ± 0.79• | 93.34 ± 0.10• | Leukemia | 98.77 ± 0.03 | 96.60 ± 00.46• | 97.97 ± 0.38• | 98.22 ± 0.55• | 97.47 ± 0.51• | 95.64 ± 0.49• | Breast | 97.88 ± 0.45 | 88.50 ± 0.72• | 98.60 ± 0.63o | 98.89 ± 0.47o | 92.74 ± 0.45• | 96.84 ± 0.02• | Lung | 99.54 ± 0.11 | 94.36 ± 0.42• | 97.56 ± 0.23• | 96.30 ± 0.39• | 97.08 ± 0.37• | 95.56 ± 0.55• | Ovarian | 99.40 ± 0.26 | 99.37 ± 0.12 | 99.77 ± 0.07o | 99.57 ± 0.11 | 99.76 ± 0.08o | 98.66 ± 0.35• | MLL | 99.31 ± 0.55 | 96.03 ± 0.59• | 97.61 ± 0.31• | 97.63 ± 0.45• | 97.11 ± 0.55• | 96.80 ± 0.31• | SRBCT | 99.59 ± 0.16 | 93.96 ± 0.59• | 97.44 ± 0.41• | 98.16 ± 0.39• | 96.46 ± 0.58• | 97.23 ± 0.44• | Win Tie Loss | | 7/1/0 | 6/0/2 | 5/2/1 | 7/0/1 | 7/1/0 |
|
|
Specifies that RotBoost is significantly better, and opoints out that RotBoost is notably worse at the significance level α = 0.05.
|