Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2013, Article ID 485103, 8 pages
Review Article

From the Mediterranean to the Sea of Japan: The Transcontinental Odyssey of Autoinflammatory Diseases

1Institute of Pediatrics, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
2Research Center of Systemic Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Diseases, Rheumatology Unit, Policlinico Le Scotte, University of Siena, Viale Bracci 1, 53100 Siena, Italy

Received 14 May 2013; Revised 23 June 2013; Accepted 25 June 2013

Academic Editor: Ruben Queiro-Silva

Copyright © 2013 Donato Rigante et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Autoinflammatory diseases are comprehensively caused by aberrant production of proinflammatory cytokines and are revealed by cyclically and spontaneously occurring inflammatory events. Over the last decade, there has been a revolution in the understanding of periodic fever syndromes, cryopyrinopathies, and skin disorders with pyogenic, granulomatous, or dystrophic features, which have been recognized across different countries spanning from the Mediterranean basin to the Japanese archipelago. Many children and adults with autoinflammatory diseases continue to elude diagnosis, and the diagnostic delay of many years puts these patients at risk of long-term severe complications, such as amyloidosis. Any hint of suspicion of autoinflammatory disease thus needs to be highlighted in various medical specialties, and this review examines their frequencies around the world, trying to match them with geographic location, ethnic and genetic data, in an attempt to realize a geoepidemiologic map for most of these conditions.

1. Introduction

Inflammation is traditionally classified among the nonspecific defense mechanisms of the human body: this is partly true for acute inflammation, which can be fatal in vital districts such as the brain and heart and completely untrue for chronic inflammation, which represents the largest sector of human pathology and is a central component of the specific immune response, involving several cell types and hundreds of different molecules with innumerable interactions among one another. Autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs) were so named in 1999 to characterize a group of hereditable monogenic conditions, defined by recurrent episodes of systemic and organ-specific sterile inflammation caused by mutations in proteins involved in the innate immune response [1]: these include cytokine receptors, receptor antagonists, and components of the inflammasome, that is, a set of intracellular protein complexes that enable the autocatalytic activation of inflammatory caspases, driving the release of interleukin-1 (IL-1)/IL-1 family members into the blood stream [2]. By specifically blocking IL-1, we have learned a great deal about the role of this cytokine in inflammation and the central role of caspase activation in the pathogenesis of various AIDs, which have been recognized across different countries spanning from the Mediterranean sea to East Asia [3].

2. Familial Mediterranean Fever

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is the most common AID, predominating in people living around the Eastern Mediterranean basin [4] and is caused by loss-of-function mutations within the MEFV gene: pyrin is the product of MEFV and is an intracellular regulator of IL-1 production [5]. In Sephardic Jews, Turks, Arabs, and Armenians, the carrier rate for a mutant MEFV allele ranges from 1 : 3 (Armenia) to 1 : 6, the highest rates reported for an autosomal recessive disorder [6]. Despite the high frequency of these recessive alleles, the prevalence of patients with a definite diagnosis of FMF is much lower than expected, and the spectrum of clinical symptoms may differ considerably from one patient to another, depending on specific mutations, with a variegated risk of secondary renal amyloidosis [7]. This surprisingly increased normal carrier rate cannot be explained by intense inbreeding or elevated genetic drift alone, and the presence of recurrent mutations in MEFV suggests a common ancestral origin, implying a strong selection pressure. FMF is classically described as autosomal recessive, but many patients have only one mutated allele justifying a dominant pattern of inheritance, which might confer an evolutionary advantage in resisting an endemic pathogen [8]. MEFV mutations probably arose in pre-Biblical times and were disseminated into various populations, where they are still found today, with nonuniform distribution: Jews, being genetically isolated, might represent the most likely candidate population for the greatest number of founder effects in MEFV [9]. Jalkh et al. estimated the ages of the most recent common ancestor for the MEFV mutations M694V, M694I, V726A, M680I, and E148Q to be 7000, 8500, 15000, 23000, and 30000 years B.C., respectively [10]. However, FMF can be seen in other ethnic groups as well, as in the Japanese population, albeit at a much lower frequency [11]. The hypothesis that other genetic systems affect the expression of FMF is supported by evidence that clinical symptoms of FMF-affected migrants living in Germany resemble those observed in their home country [12]. In addition, country of origin is the key risk factor for amyloidosis in FMF, and a patient’s country should be considered in addition to MEFV genotype as an indication for prophylactic colchicine, an alkaloid extracted from lily plants, which is the most efficacious drug in FMF [13].

Table 1 lists the general details of FMF. Patients with the disease suffer lifelong self-limited recurrent bouts of fever and pain in the serosal and synovial membranes [14], with a periodicity varying from weekly to quarterly [15]. Diagnosis of FMF remains clinical and requires information about ethnic background, family history, and response to colchicine, since specific laboratory tests are not available [16]; genetic diagnosis can be confirmed by the presence of two mutations in the MEFV gene in at least 70% of patients with overt FMF, but heterozygous mutation carriers can also suffer from incomplete or even typical disease [17]. Colchicine’s inhibitory effect on IL-1 release and its prophylactic role in preventing the recurrence of FMF attacks were discovered serendipitously [18]; however, alternative medications such as IL-1 blockers have been shown to be highly effective in poor responders to colchicine [19].

Table 1: The clinical features of familial Mediterranean fever.

3. Mevalonate Kinase Deficiency

Mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD) is due to mutations in the MVK gene, encoding the second enzyme of mevalonate pathway, which results in abnormal enzymatic activity and subsequent shortage of downstream compounds, as serum cholesterol [20]. The disease was initially recognized in the Netherlands, then in people from different countries of northwestern Europe, in whom there is a carriage rate of 1 : 350 for the V377I MVK mutation [21]. Vuch et al. have hypothesized a selective advantage for heterozygote carriers of the most frequent MVK mutations in those countries where the diet is characterized by high consumption of saturated animal fats, rich in cholesterol [22]. MKD usually starts in childhood with abrupt febrile flares, skin or joint symptoms, and severe gastrointestinal complaints, sometimes induced by vaccinations or viral infections [23]. Highly characteristic of MKD are systemic antibiotic-resistant inflammation, elevated serum IgD in any phase of the disease, increased circulating IgMIgD+ B lymphocytes, and increased urinary excretion of mevalonic acid during febrile flares [24]. General details of MKD are described in Table 2. Diagnosis of MKD is clinical, though genetic confirmation is required, mostly when serum IgD level is within the normal range. Treatment may require nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids during attacks, but great attention is now being given to IL-1 antagonists [25, 26], due also to the increasing evidence that IL-1 overproduction is fundamentally involved in the pathophysiology of this condition [27].

Table 2: The clinical features of mevalonate kinase deficiency.

4. Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Periodic Syndrome

Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) was originally described in a family of Irish and Scottish pedigree and initially thought to be a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-mediated disease, resulting from the failure of the TNF receptor to insert itself into cell membrane [28]. This is the most common dominant form of AID in Europe, historically known as “familial Hibernian fever,” from the ancient Latin name “Hibernia” given to Ireland: different mechanisms, from TNF receptor misfolding to abnormal trafficking, have been reported to explain TRAPS at a pathogenic level, leading to mutated TNF receptor accumulation inside cells and causing increased activation of reactive oxygen species and subsequent IL-1 release [29]. In TRAPS patients, the interpretation of TNFRSF1A mutations might be challenging: for instance, P46L substitution occurs in up to 20% of clinically asymptomatic West African individuals, which suggests that it represents a polymorphism rather than a disease-causing mutation, and R92Q substitution, relatively common in the Caucasian population, is a low-penetrance variant, which could have a weak contribution to disease expression. Moreover, TNFRSF1A mutations affecting TNF receptor shedding from cell membranes might potentially generate a selective advantage related to an increased antibacterial capacity [30].

The clinical picture is protean, characterized by long-lasting febrile episodes, differently from other AIDs and troublesome for both patients and clinicians [31]. General details are listed in Table 3. Genotype analysis is required for diagnosis of TRAPS, while prognosis is mainly determined by the risk of renal amyloidosis, which can be observed in 25% of patients with peculiar TNFRSF1A mutations [32]. Treatment with corticosteroids alleviates the inflammatory symptoms of TRAPS, but does not affect the frequency of attacks. The antitumor necrosis factor inhibitor etanercept has been used with some nonspecific benefit [33], while treatment with IL-1 blockers prevents disease relapse if administered for at least two weeks at the onset of fever [34].

Table 3: The clinical features of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic fever syndrome.

5. NLRP-Related Diseases

The cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS) encompass three diseases which represent a phenotypic spectrum, with mutations in the same NLRP3 gene encoding cryopyrin, the master controller of caspase activation following numerous triggers, including invading pathogens and genotoxic stress. There is no apparent selective advantage demonstrated for CAPS.  Mutated cryopyrins can be found in at least 60% of patients, leading to the constitutive activation of the inflammasome and subsequent dysregulated IL-1 overproduction: excessive IL-1 signaling appears to be a constant feature in the background of CAPS, driven by gain-of-function NLRP3 mutations [35]. Familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome, Muckle-Wells syndrome, and neonatal onset multisystem inflammatory disorder (NOMID) have a significant symptom overlap, including fatigue, fever, and inflammation of the skin, eyes, bones, joints, and meninges, which might even reduce life expectancy [36]. Although rare, NOMID has been reported across the world and is the most severe expression of CAPS, with typical hypertrophic arthropathy involving both epiphyses of long bones and kneecaps, aseptic chronic meningitis, elevated intracranial pressure, deafness, and growth retardation [37]. General details of NLRP-related diseases, including the recently identified NLRP12-associated autoinflammatory disorder, are summarized in Table 4. Treatment had been quite disappointing until the impressive clinical results obtained with IL-1 antagonists, linking all CAPS specifically to IL-1 secretion and instituting IL-1 blockage as the gold standard treatment [38]. Anakinra, the recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist, was the first biologic designed for the selective blockage of IL-1 [39], while canakinumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-IL-1beta antibody, has recently been registered for patients with CAPS, though the optimal administration schedule in terms of dosage and frequency of injections is still undetermined [40].

Table 4: The clinical features of NLRP-related diseases.

6. Skin Autoinflammatory Disorders

Different AIDs can be encountered in a dermatological setting, and several syndromes display a combination of recurrent early-onset fevers, multisystem inflammation, and cutaneous lesions, for which a skin biopsy might provide diagnostic insight [41]. Table 5 lists these conditions. Among pyogenic disorders, PAPA syndrome is defined by the triad of “pyogenic arthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum, and cystic acne”, arising from mutations in the PSTPIP1 gene encoding a protein called “CD2 binding protein 1” and leading to disrupted interaction with pyrin and the inflammasome [42]: the first description of PAPA syndrome dates back to the 1997 report of an extended family with 10 affected members in three generations, although no geographical restriction was noted in the following reports. Potential treatment methods for patients with PAPA syndrome are corticosteroids, IL-1 antagonists, and tumor necrosis factor blocking agents, with varying results in terms of clinical effectiveness [43].

Table 5: Dermal pathology of skin autoinflammatory disorders.

The deficiency of the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, caused by loss-of-function mutations in the IL1RN gene, leads to unopposed proinflammatory IL-1 signaling and is revealed by pustular skin eruption and multifocal osteomyelitis, which occur in the neonatal period and respond excellently to anakinra. The first report describing this condition concerned 9 cases from the Netherlands, Canada, Lebanon, and Puerto Rico [44].

In 1985, Blau described the presence of a peculiar phenotype in 11 family members spanning four generations, characterized by asymptomatic ichthyosiform rash, deforming polyarthritides with boggy synovial effusions or cysts, and severe recurrent panuveitis: the disease was then called Blau syndrome and related to gain-of-function mutations in the NOD2 gene, inherited in an autosomal dominant manner [45]. Systemic corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy, but steroid-sparing agents such as methotrexate, tumor necrosis factor-inhibitors, or IL-1 antagonists have frequently been used [46].

Despite demonstration of the great efficacy of IL-1 blocking therapy in many AIDs, revealing innate immune system workings and the key role of IL-1 in autoinflammatory attacks, new AIDs have recently been recognized as unresponsive to IL-1 antagonists, including the proteasome-related “chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatitis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperature” syndrome, or CANDLE syndrome, which was initially described in different areas of Japan and named Nakajo-Nishimura syndrome [47]. The disease starts in the first year of life  with a skin eruption evolving to lipomuscular atrophy in the upper body, associated with periodic high fevers and has been recognized in different countries around the world, not only in the area of Japan. Joint contractures, muscle atrophy, and panniculitis-induced lipodystrophy have also been listed as crucial signs, and the disease is now included in the group of proteasome disability syndromes, a new category of AID caused by mutations in the PSMB8 gene, encoding the β5i subunit of the immunoproteasome, the protease complex specialized for the degradation of polyubiquitinated proteins [48]. Interferon-gamma and interleukin-6 are the basic mediators of systemic inflammation observed in these patients, urging the continuation of research to characterize alternative subverted innate immune pathways in clinical medicine.

The up-to-date enhancement of genetic tools has led to the recognition of an increasing number of patients with AIDs and to a better description of multiple disease phenotypes. Genes involved in the regulation of the inflammatory response may also participate to the pathogenesis of different rare diseases with no precise etiology, which cannot be defined as AIDs, characterized by relapsing attacks: that is, intermittent hydrarthrosis, characterized by periodic episodes of painless joint swelling, unexpectedly associated with high frequency of heterozygous mutations in the MEFV gene [49], systemic capillary leak syndrome, in which spontaneous capillary leakage and shift of plasma from the intravascular to the extravascular space occur [50], and palindromic rheumatism, with idiopathic sudden-onset episodes of recurrent arthritis [51].

Recently, a European AID registry, the “Eurofever registry”, has shown that a considerable number of patients with AIDs are of European ancestry [52], and many mutation profiles show differences when analyzed for distinct populations; that is, the MEFV E148Q mutation is frequently found in Europe, while the double heterozygosis E148Q/M694I is mainly observed in Japan [53]. FMF can provide an example of historical positive selection pressure, favouring heterozygosity of MEFV mutations: their extensive spread in an ideal “odyssey” through Arab conquests, the dispersal of the Armenian nation, the Jewish Diaspora, and the East-to-West European migration of recent years might reflect a better response to intracellular pathogens or a potential protection against still unknown diseases (Figure 1). A number of questions remain regarding the biologic basis of the heterozygote advantage for recessively inherited AID-related genes or the natural selection of mutated genes related to dominantly-inherited AID. Nevertheless, our final impression is that AIDs can be recognized across multiple ethnicities without any geographical restriction, and therefore, clinicians’ awareness of AIDs must be reinforced across various medical specialties. Further research is ongoing with the aim of strengthening our comprehension of the genetics behind these heterogeneous conditions, personalizing therapies with anti-inflammatory cytokines or at least mitigating the intensity of the inflammatory cascade, and improving the destiny of children and adults with AIDs.

Figure 1: The migration of M694V, V726A, E148Q, and M694I MEFV mutations from Eastern Mediterranean areas may ideally explain some ethnically restricted prevalence data for familial Mediterranean fever.

7. Conclusive Remarks

The study of AIDs, characterized by lifelong recurrent and seemingly unprovoked episodes of inflammation and fever, has revealed that specific conditions like FMF, MKD, TRAPS, NLRP-related diseases, and skin autoinflammatory disorders have distinct features and specific therapeutic options, emphasizing the need for a precise diagnostic identification in each case. Obtaining a family history is an essential part of the evaluation protocol of these patients, and priority is to examine proband’s clinical and laboratory data both in the acute inflammatory phase and in the intercritical phase, in order to confirm the presence of a subclinical inflammation between attacks and exclude a host of chronic diseases of infectious, autoimmune, and even neoplastic nature. A substantial contribution to the diagnosis derives from both the consideration of ethnicity and genotype analysis related to MEFV, MVK, TNFRSF1A, NLRP3, NLRP12, PSTPIP1, IL1RN, CARD15/NOD2, and PSMB8, which are the genes responsible for the syndromes collectively termed AIDs. However, the diagnostic path for many of these patients remains often long and requires high-level expertise: the creation of international registries is highly needed to standardize guidelines about the role of genetics in the diagnosis and expedite the definition of the best treatment protocols.


The authors thank Theresa Davis for her language assistance and Adele Compagnone for her graphics assistance in the figure.


  1. P. J. Hashkes and O. Toker, “Autoinflammatory syndromes,” Pediatric Clinics of North America, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 447–470, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Lamkanfi and V. M. Dixit, “Inflammasomes and their roles in health and disease,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 28, pp. 137–161, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. D. Rigante, “The fresco of autoinflammatory diseases from the pediatric perspective,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 348–356, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. Ben-Chetrit and I. Touitou, “Familial Mediterranean fever in the world,” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 1447–1453, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Guz, M. Kanbay, and M. A. Ozturk, “Current perspectives on familial Mediterranean fever,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 309–315, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Ben-Chetrit and M. Levy, “Familial Mediterranean fever,” The Lancet, vol. 351, no. 9103, pp. 659–664, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Rigante, I. La Torraca, V. Ansuini, A. Compagnone, A. Sallì, and A. Stabile, “The multi-face expression of familial Mediterranean fever in the child,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 163–171, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Cattan, “Familial Mediterranean fever: is low mortality from tuberculosis a specific advantage for MEFV mutations carriers? Mortality from tuberculosis among Muslims, Jewish, French, Italian and Maltese patients in Tunis (Tunisia) in the first half of the 20th century,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 21, supplement 30, pp. S53–S54, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  9. V. P. Papadopoulos, S. Giaglis, I. Mitroulis, and K. Ritis, “The population genetics of familial Mediterranean fever: a meta-analysis study,” Annals of Human Genetics, vol. 72, part 6, pp. 752–761, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Jalkh, E. Génin, E. Chouery et al., “Familial Mediterranean fever in Lebanon: founder effects for different MEFV mutations,” Annals of Human Genetics, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Tsuchiya-Suzuki, M. Yazaki, A. Nakamura et al., “Clinical and genetic features of familial Mediterranean fever in Japan,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1671–1676, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. Ebrahimi-Fakhari, S. O. Schِnland, U. Hegenbart et al., “Familial Mediterranean fever in Germany: clinical presentation and amyloidosis risk,” Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 52–58, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. I. Touitou, T. Sarkisian, M. Medlej-Hashim et al., “Country as the primary risk factor for renal amyloidosis in familial Mediterranean fever,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1706–1712, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. Sohar, J. Gafni, M. Pras, and H. Heller, “Familial Mediterranean fever. A survey of 470 cases and review of the literature,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 227–253, 1967. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Samuels, I. Aksentijevich, Y. Torosyan et al., “Familial Mediterranean fever at the millennium clinical spectrum, ancient mutations, and a survey of 100 American referrals to the national institutes of health,” Medicine, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 268–297, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Livneh, P. Langevitz, D. Zemer et al., “Criteria for the diagnosis of familial Mediterranean fever,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1879–1885, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Soriano and R. Manna, “Familial Mediterranean fever: new phenotypes,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. D. Rigante, I. La Torraca, L. Avallone, A. L. Pugliese, S. Gaspari, and A. Stabile, “The pharmacologic basis of treatment with colchicine in children with familial Mediterranean fever,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 173–178, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. Roldan, A. M. Ruiz, M. D. Miranda, and E. Collantes, “Anakinra: new therapeutic approach in children with familial Mediterranean fever resistant to colchicine,” Joint Bone Spine, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 504–505, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. W. M. van der Meer, J. M. Vossen, J. Radl et al., “Hyperimmunoglobulinemia D and periodic fever: a new syndrome,” The Lancet, vol. 1, no. 8386, pp. 1087–1090, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. J. Lachmann, “Clinical immunology review series: an approach to the patient with a periodic fever syndrome,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 301–309, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Vuch, A. Marcuzzi, A. M. Bianco, A. Tommasini, V. Zanin, and S. Crovella, “Evolutionary hypothesis of the mevalonate kinase deficiency,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 67–69, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. J. P. H. Drenth, C. J. Haagsma, J. W. M. van der Meer et al., “Hyperimmunoglobulinemia D and periodic fever syndrome. The clinical spectrum in a series of 50 patients,” Medicine, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 133–144, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. W. Ammouri, L. Cuisset, S. Rouaghe et al., “Diagnostic value of serum immunoglobulinaemia D level in patients with a clinical suspicion of hyper IgD syndrome,” Rheumatology, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1597–1600, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. Rigante, V. Ansuini, B. Bertoni et al., “Treatment with anakinra in the hyperimmunoglobulinemia D/periodic fever syndrome,” Rheumatology International, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 97–100, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. E. J. Bodar, L. M. Kuijk, J. P. H. Drenth, J. W. M. van der Meer, A. Simon, and J. Frenkel, “On-demand anakinra treatment is effective in mevalonate kinase deficiency,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 2155–2158, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. P. H. Drenth, M. van Deuren, J. van der Ven-Jongekrijg, C. G. Schalkwijk, and J. W. M. van der Meer, “Cytokine activation during attacks of the hyperimmunoglobulinemia D and periodic fever syndrome,” Blood, vol. 85, no. 12, pp. 3586–3593, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. I. Aksentijevich, J. Galon, M. Soares et al., “The tumor-necrosis-factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome: new mutations in TNFRSF1A, ancestral origins, genotype-phenotype studies, and evidence for further genetic heterogeneity of periodic fevers,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 301–314, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. B. Nedjai, G. A. Hitman, L. D. Church et al., “Differential cytokine secretion results from p65 and c-Rel NF-κB subunit signaling in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of TNF receptor-associated periodic syndrome patients,” Cellular Immunology, vol. 268, no. 2, pp. 55–59, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. G. Ryan and R. Goldbach-Mansky, “The spectrum of autoinflammatory diseases: recent bench to bedside observations,” Current Opinion in Rheumatology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 66–75, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Stojanov and M. F. McDermott, “The tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome: current concepts,” Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine, vol. 7, no. 22, pp. 1–18, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. Dinc, H. Erdem, D. Rowczenio et al., “Autosomal dominant periodic fever with AA amyloidosis: tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) in a Turkish family,” Journal of Nephrology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 626–629, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. L. Cantarini, D. Rigante, O. M. Lucherini et al., “Role of etanercept in the treatment of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome: personal experience and review of the literature,” International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 701–707, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Gattorno, M. A. Pelagatti, A. Meini et al., “Persistent efficacy of anakinra in patients with tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1516–1520, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. L. Cantarini, O. M. Lucherini, B. Frediani et al., “Bridging the gap between the clinician and the patient with cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes,” International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 827–836, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. Maksimovic, J. Stirnemann, F. Caux et al., “New CIAS1 mutation and anakinra efficacy in overlapping of Muckle-Wells and familial cold autoinflammatory syndromes,” Rheumatology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 309–310, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. I. Aksentijevich, C. D. Putnam, E. F. Remmers et al., “The clinical continuum of cryopyrinopathies: novel CIAS1 mutations in North American patients and a new cryopyrin model,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1273–1285, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. R. Yu and K. S. Leslie, “Cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome: an update on diagnosis and treatment response,” Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. Rigante, A. Leone, R. Marrocco, M. E. Laino, and A. Stabile, “Long-term response after 6-year treatment with anakinra and onset of focal bone erosion in neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease (NOMID/CINCA),” Rheumatology International, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 1661–1664, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. H. J. Lachmann, I. Kone-Paut, J. B. Kuemmerle-Deschner et al., “Use of canakinumab in the cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 360, no. 23, pp. 2416–2425, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. D. Rigante and L. Cantarini, “Monogenic autoinflammatory syndromes at a dermatological level,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 303, no. 6, pp. 375–380, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. B. Tallon and M. Corkill, “Peculiarities of PAPA syndrome,” Rheumatology, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1140–1143, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. A. P. Demidowich, A. F. Freeman, D. B. Kuhns et al., “Brief report: genotype, phenotype, and clinical course in five patients with PAPA syndrome (pyogenic sterile arthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum, and acne),” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2022–2027, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. I. Aksentijevich, S. L. Masters, P. J. Ferguson et al., “An autoinflammatory disease with deficiency of the interleukin-1-receptor antagonist,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 360, pp. 2426–2437, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. E. B. Blau, “Familial granulomatous arthritis, iritis, and rash,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 107, no. 5, pp. 689–693, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. P. Sfriso, F. Caso, S. Tognon, P. Galozzi, A. Gava, and L. Punzi, “Blau syndrome, clinical and genetic aspects,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 44–51, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. N. Kanazawa, “Nakajo-Nishimura syndrome: an autoinflammatory disorder showing pernio-like rashes and progressive partial lipodystrophy,” Allergology International, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 197–206, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. A. Torrelo, S. Patel, I. Colmenero et al., “Chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperature (CANDLE) syndrome,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 489–495, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. D. Cañete, J. I. Aróstegui, R. Queiró et al., “Association of intermittent hydrarthrosis with MEFV gene mutations,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 2334–2335, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  50. M. Piastra, D. Pietrini, G. Conti, G. de Rosa, and D. Rigante, “Sudden shock from capillary leak,” The Lancet, vol. 379, no. 9819, p. 976, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. D. Cañete, J. I. Arostegui, R. Queiró et al., “An unexpectedly high frequency of MEFV mutations in patients with anti-citrullinated protein antibody-negative palindromic rheumatism,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 2784–2788, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. N. T. Haar, H. Lachmann, S. Ozen et al., “Treatment of autoinflammatory diseases: results from the eurofever registry and a literature review,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 678–685, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. K. Migita, R. Uehara, Y. Nakamura et al., “Familial Mediterranean fever in Japan,” Medicine, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 337–343, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar