Review Article
Current Stem Cell Delivery Methods for Myocardial Repair
Table 1
Surgical direct myocardial injection studies.
| Study | No. of patients | Cell type | No. of cells | Outcome |
|
Hamano et al. (2001) [85] | 5/0 | ABMMNC | 5 × 107–1 × 108 | 3/5 showed improvement in coronary perfusion | Patel et al. (2005) [81] | 10/10 | CD34 + BMC | 2.2 × 107 | Significant improvement in cardiac function | Gavira et al. (2006) [89] | 12/14 | SMB | 2.21 × 108 | Increased global and regional LVEF improvement in viability, and perfusion of cardiac tissue | Mocini et al. (2006) [90] | 18/18 | ABMMNC | 2.92 × 108 | Improvement in LVEF and wall motion score index | Klein et al. (2007) [91] | 10/0 | CD133 + BMC | 1.5 × 106–9.7 × 106 | Improvement in LVEF | Ahmadi et al. (2007) [92] | 18/9 | CD133 + BMC | N/A | Improvement in wall motion score index and perfusion of cardiac tissue | Stamm et al. (2007) [93] | 20/20 | CD133 + BMC | 5 × 106 | Improvement in LVEF and perfusion of cardiac tissue | Pompilio et al. (2008) [82] | 5/0 | CD133 + BMC | 4 × 106–12 × 106 | Improvement in perfusion but no significant improvement in LVEF | Zhao et al. (2008) [94] | 18/18 | ABMMNC | 6.59 × 108 | Improvement in LVEF, wall motion score index, and perfusion of cardiac tissue |
Menasché et al. (2008) [56] | 33/34/30 | SMB | 4 × 108/8 × 108 | No improvement in regional or global LVEF | Akar et al. (2009) [95] | 25/25 | ABMMNC | 1.29 × 109 | Improvement in LVEF, perfusion, and contractility | Viswanathan et al. (2010) [96] | 15/15 | ABMMNC | 3 × 106–2.6 × 107 | Improvement in perfusion but no significant improvement in LVEF |
Nasseri (2012) [88] | 30/30 | CD133 + BMC | 5.6 × 106 | No improvement in LVEF |
|
|
ABMMNC: autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells; BMC: bone marrow cells; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; SMB: skeletal myoblast.
|