Review Article

Current Stem Cell Delivery Methods for Myocardial Repair

Table 1

Surgical direct myocardial injection studies.

StudyNo. of patientsCell typeNo. of cells Outcome

Hamano et al. (2001) [85]5/0ABMMNC5 × 107–1 × 1083/5 showed improvement in coronary perfusion
Patel et al. (2005) [81]10/10CD34 + BMC2.2 × 107Significant improvement in cardiac function
Gavira et al. (2006) [89]12/14SMB2.21 × 108Increased global and regional LVEF improvement in viability, and perfusion of cardiac tissue
Mocini et al. (2006) [90]18/18ABMMNC2.92 × 108Improvement in LVEF and wall motion score index
Klein et al. (2007) [91]10/0CD133 + BMC1.5 × 106–9.7 × 106Improvement in LVEF
Ahmadi et al. (2007) [92]18/9CD133 + BMCN/AImprovement in wall motion score index and perfusion of cardiac tissue
Stamm et al. (2007) [93]20/20CD133 + BMC5 × 106Improvement in LVEF and perfusion of cardiac tissue
Pompilio et al. (2008) [82]5/0CD133 + BMC4 × 106–12 × 106Improvement in perfusion but no significant improvement in LVEF
Zhao et al. (2008) [94]18/18ABMMNC6.59 × 108Improvement in LVEF, wall motion score index, and perfusion of cardiac tissue
Menasché et al. (2008) [56]33/34/30SMB4 × 108/8 × 108No improvement in regional or global LVEF
Akar et al. (2009) [95]25/25ABMMNC1.29 × 109Improvement in LVEF, perfusion, and contractility
Viswanathan et al. (2010) [96]15/15ABMMNC3 × 106–2.6 × 107Improvement in perfusion but no significant improvement in LVEF
Nasseri (2012) [88]30/30CD133 + BMC5.6 × 106No improvement in LVEF

ABMMNC: autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells; BMC: bone marrow cells; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; SMB: skeletal myoblast.