An Alternative Approach to Protein Folding

Table 2

Comparison between KM and PSIPRED.

	KM	KM	KM	PSI	PSI	PSI
PDB	% all	% 𝛽	% 𝛼	% all	% 𝛽	% 𝛼
1hdn	73.8	78.5	82.26	89	88	93
1ubq	76.32	72.73	94.11	82	73	77
1vii	72.2	non	78.95	80	non	100
2nmq	64.18	65.38	non	60	54	non
1pba	74.04	non	73.33	68	non	70
1aps	84.7	80	90	80	83	87
1aey	67.3	77.8	non	44	35	non
1coa	45.31	71.05	61.53	81	60	92
1fkb	61.61	72.97	100	88	90	100
1mjc	71.01	80.64	non	69	70	non
1nyf	59.73	40	70	62	54	0
1pks	65	53.57	64.75	59	48	0
1shg	63.2	61.23	non	42	25	non
1srl	65.56	75	100	53	37	0
1ten	74.44	68	non	80	85	non
1ycc	63.4	58.58	60.01	51	0	53
2ci2	66.26	64.34	79.84	47	28	0
Avg	67.59	67.99	79.98	66.76	55.33	51.69

KM means the developed model and PSI means PSIPRED, which is developed by the University of London. Other names mean the percentage of prediction of total structure, alpha-helix, and beta-sheet with respect to two different methods. To compute prediction rate, NMR structure of each protein was used.