Research Article

Association of CILP2 and ACE Gene Polymorphisms with Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Slovak Midlife Women

Table 3

Bonferonni pairwise comparisons between CILP2 genotypes and lipid levels.

ParameterCILP2 genotypeEstimated marginal meanSE95% CIMean difference SE 95% CI for difference

HDL-CGT/TT1.740.071.601.88GT/TT versus GG0.200.070.0070.060.35
GG1.540.021.491.58
LDL-CGT/TT2.840.182.493.19GT/TT versus GG 0.190.016
GG3.290.063.173.40
apoBGT/TT0.810.050.720.90GT/TT versus GG 0.050.004
GG0.950.010.920.98
apoB-to-apoA1GT/TT0.470.030.410.53GT/TT versus GG 0.030.002
GG0.580.010.560.60
TC-to-HDL-CGT/TT3.180.202.793.56GT/TT versus GG 0.030.002
GG3.760.063.643.88
non-HDL-CGT/TT3.390.193.013.77GT/TT versus GG 0.200.009
GG3.920.063.804.04
LDL-C-to-HDL-CGT/TT1.810.171.482.14GT/TT versus GG 0.170.006
GG2.29 0.052.192.40

Based on estimated marginal means.
Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Bonferroni.