|
Genotyping | |
Quality of raw data | |
Lack of data legend | |
Lack of DNA variants detection | |
Correctness of the nomenclature | |
Completeness of technical information | |
Correctness/lack of detection rate | |
Problems with counting of triplets (X-Fra) | |
Lack of indication for advanced investigations when appropriate | |
Interpretation | |
Lack and/or inaccuracy of important information on the pathogenic role of mutation and/or reproductive risk (not for APC), and/or other important information. | |
Lack of information about test validity | |
Lack of genetic counseling indication if necessary | |
Reporting | |
General inadequacy of the report | |
Inadequate language | |
Lack of laboratory heading | |
Lack of identification of the patient | |
Clerical error in identification of the patient | |
Lack of gender indication | |
Lack of geographical origin of the patient where necessary | |
Lack of identification number of sample | |
Lack of report title | |
Lack of reason for testing | |
Lack of sample source | |
Lack of primary sample type | |
Lack of signature of the person releasing the report | |
Lack of date primary sample collection and release of the report | |
Lack of indication of certification/accreditation of laboratory | |
Lack of page numbering | |
|