BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Actinomycetes: Role in Biotechnology and Medicine

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 835081 |

Thais D. Mendes, Warley S. Borges, Andre Rodrigues, Scott E. Solomon, Paulo C. Vieira, Marta C. T. Duarte, Fernando C. Pagnocca, "Anti-Candida Properties of Urauchimycins from Actinobacteria Associated with Trachymyrmex Ants", BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 835081, 8 pages, 2013.

Anti-Candida Properties of Urauchimycins from Actinobacteria Associated with Trachymyrmex Ants

Academic Editor: Manish Bodas
Received12 Nov 2012
Revised29 Jan 2013
Accepted02 Feb 2013
Published18 Mar 2013


After decades of intensive searching for antimicrobial compounds derived from actinobacteria, the frequency of isolation of new molecules has decreased. To cope with this concern, studies have focused on the exploitation of actinobacteria from unexplored environments and actinobacteria symbionts of plants and animals. In this study, twenty-four actinobacteria strains isolated from workers of Trachymyrmex ants were evaluated for antifungal activity towards a variety of Candida species. Results revealed that seven strains inhibited the tested Candida species. Streptomyces sp. TD025 presented potent and broad spectrum of inhibition of Candida and was selected for the isolation of bioactive molecules. From liquid shake culture of this bacterium, we isolated the rare antimycin urauchimycins A and B. For the first time, these molecules were evaluated for antifungal activity against medically important Candida species. Both antimycins showed antifungal activity, especially urauchimycin B. This compound inhibited the growth of all Candida species tested, with minimum inhibitory concentration values equivalent to the antifungal nystatin. Our results concur with the predictions that the attine ant-microbe symbiosis may be a source of bioactive metabolites for biotechnology and medical applications.

1. Introduction

The increased resistance of microorganisms to antibiotics is a problem of public health [1]. The increasing number of fungal species that can infect humans, particularly immunocompromised individuals, further reinforces this concern. A limited number of antifungal agents are commercially available when compared to antibacterial drugs. This scenario motivates the search for new bioactive compounds in various biological systems using several approaches, including metagenomics and microbial genome-mining.

Actinobacteria are widely known for their ability to produce bioactive secondary metabolites, especially compounds with antimicrobial activity. These bacteria are responsible for producing two-thirds of the commercially available antibiotics [2, 3]. Most actinobacteria species explored commercially were isolated from the soil. However, after decades of bioprospecting actinobacteria from this environment, it is becoming more difficult to obtain strains producing novel bioactive metabolites [4]. Thus, many companies have turned the search for microbial producers of novel antifungal compounds to other environments such as hydrothermal vents, marine environments, tropical rain forests, and microbial symbionts associated with plants and animals hosts [5, 6]. For example, the occurrence of actinobacteria associated with marine sponges and the fact that such strains produce compounds with antimicrobial activity confirms this potential [79]. In addition, endophytic actinobacteria are also explored for their capacity to produce antimicrobial compounds [1012].

Several studies have focused on the association between actinobacteria and insects from an ecological perspective [1325]. On the other hand, few studies have focused on the multitude of chemical compounds that are involved in such interactions [26]. The best studied example is the symbiosis between actinobacteria and fungus-growing ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: tribe Attini). In this association, the actinobacteria are found on the ants’ integument and produce antimicrobial compounds that help the ants to suppress the microfungus Escovopsis sp. [13, 14]. This fungus is considered a specialized parasite of the ant cultivar and causes negative impacts to the ant colony [27].

Actinobacteria isolated from the integument of attine ants are generally classified in the genus Pseudonocardia and Streptomyces. Bioactive molecules have already been isolated and characterized from actinobacteria isolated from several attine genera [26]. Pseudonocardia isolated from Acromyrmex octospinosus and Apterostigma dentigerum are known to produce several compounds like (i) dentigerumycin, a complex compound active against Candida albicans and Escovopsis [28]; (ii) a nystatin-like antifungal [29]; (iii) the novel quinone pseudonocardones A–C active against the malaria causal agent Plasmodium berghei [30]; (iv) the already known antibiotics 6-deoxy-8-O-methylrabelomycin and X-14 881, both active against Bacillus subtilis and P. berghei [30]. In addition to Pseudonocardia, actinobacteria in the genus Streptomyces are also found on the integument of Acromyrmex workers and were shown to produce (i) candicidin, active against Escovopsis sp. [29, 3134], (ii) antimycins active against Escovopsis sp. [3234], and (iii) actinomycin D, actinomycin X2 and valinomycin that are active against B. subtilis [32].

Poulsen [35] suggested that the attine ant-microbe association is little explored regarding the search for new antimicrobials. The author highlights the various symbiotic associations between attine ants and microorganisms as a promising source for drug discovery, especially those with antimicrobial activity. Here, we explored the antimicrobial potential of actinobacteria isolated from the integument of Trachymyrmex fungus-growing ants and demonstrate the action against different medically important Candida species. We also report two previously described urauchimycins from a Streptomyces strain and emphasize the newly discovered anti-Candida activity of these compounds.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Actinobacteria Isolation and Identification

Twelve Trachymyrmex colonies were collected in different Brazilian biomes (see Table S1 in Supplementary Material available online at Colonies were carefully excavated in order to reach the first fungus garden chamber. Fungus garden with the tending workers and brood was sampled using an alcohol-flamed spoon and stored in sterile plastic containers. All containers were kept in a cooler during transport to the laboratory where they were maintained at 25°C.

From each colony, we randomly selected four workers for actinobacteria isolation. Then, the propleural plates were scraped with a sterile needle under a low power stereomicroscope. All ants used in the present study had a visible, whitish covering on the propleural plates. Scrapings were plated on SCN agar (in g · L−1: 10.0 starch, 0.3 casein, 2.0 KNO3, 2.0 NaCl, 2.0 K2HPO4, 0.05 MgSO4 · 7 H2O, 0.02 CaCO3, 0.01 FeSO4 · 7H2O and 18.0 agar supplemented with 0.05 Nystatin) [36]. After scraping, the entire body of all workers was inoculated on SCN agar. All plates were incubated at 25°C for 30 days. From each sampled Trachymyrmex colony, one representative strain was selected from each morphotype obtained. The strains were subcultured in YMA (in g · L−1: 3.0 yeast extract, 3.0 malt extract, 5.0 peptone, 10.0 glucose, 18.0 agar) and stored at −80°C in 15% glycerol.

We used a molecular approach to provide taxonomic affiliation to actinobacteria strains. Genomic DNA was extracted following the method of Sampaio et al. [37]. We carried out 16S rDNA PCR with the universal primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCATGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-TACGGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) [38]. Reactions were conducted in a final volume of 25 μL and contained 1 μL of diluted DNA template (1 : 10), 2.0 μL of each primer (10 mM), 2.5 μL of 10X buffer, 1.0 μL of MgCl2 (50 mM), 4.0 μL of dNTPs (1.25 mM each), 0.2 μL of Taq polymerase (5 U/μL), and 12.3 μL of ultrapure water. Amplicons were cleaned up with GFX PCR DNA and Gel Band Purification Kit (GE Healthcare). Forward and reverse sequences were generated using the same primers, along with an internal primer U519F (5′-CAGCMGCCGCGGTAATWC-3′). Sequences were generated using BigDye Terminator v.3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Life Technologies) in an ABI 3130 sequencer and manually edited in BioEdit v. 7.1.3 [39]. Contigs were compared with those available in the databases NCBI-GenBank ( and Ribossomal Database Project (RDP, Sequences generated in the present study were deposited in NCBI-GenBank (accessions KC480554-KC480557).

A phylogenetic analysis was carried out in order to determine the taxonomic affiliation of strain TD025. Sequences of closest relatives were retrieved from the NCBI-GenBank and the RDP Project and aligned in ClustalW. Phylogenetic reconstruction was performed using the neighbor-joining algorithm implemented in PAUP v. 4.0 [40]. Genetic distances were calculated using the Kimura 2-parameter model of nucleotide substitution [41]. Robustness of the relationships was estimated from 1000 bootstrap pseudoreplicates.

2.2. Organic Extracts and Antifungal Assays

All actinobacteria were grown in Erlenmeyer flasks (250 mL) containing 50 mL of modified MPE medium (in g · L−1: 5.0 soy flour, 20.0 glucose, 5.0 of NaCl, 4.0 CaCO3) [42]. Each flask was inoculated with five mycelium disks (1 cm in diameter) cut from a previously grown culture and then incubated at 28°C for two days on an orbital shaker at 150 rpm. From this culture, 10 mL was inoculated in two Erlenmeyer flasks (250 mL) containing 100 mL of the same medium and incubated for five days on the same conditions. After incubation, the fermented broth was separated from the mycelium by centrifugation and partitioned three times with ethyl acetate (EtOAc). The organic solvent was evaporated under vacuum, and the EtOAc extracts were diluted in RPMI-1640 culture broth containing 10% DMSO and used in the antimicrobial assays.

The antimicrobial activity of the extracts was evaluated against the yeasts Candida albicans CBS 562, Candida dubliniensis CBS 7987, Candida glabrata CBS 138, Candida krusei CBS 573, Candida parapsilosis CBS 604, and Candida tropicalis CBS 94. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined using the microdilution method according to the M27-A2 standard of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [43].

2.3. Isolation and Characterization of the Bioactive Compounds of Strain TD025

The actinobacteria strain that exhibited both a broad antifungal spectrum and lower MIC values was strain TD025. In order to identify the compounds responsible for the observed results, the strain was cultured in 5 L of modified MPE medium and the extracts were obtained as described.

The fermented broth (5 L) was separated from the cells by centrifugation and portioned three times with ethyl acetate (EtOAc). The organic solvent was evaporated under vacuum. The crude extract, a dark green oil (1.40 g), was separated by means of column chromatography using silica gel 60 eluted with n-hexane/EtOAc as the elution gradient, yielding 8 fractions. All fractions were submitted to antimicrobial assays against C. albicans following the procedure described above. The most active fraction (67.5 mg) was subjected to preparative TLC (thin layer chromatography) eluted with n-hexane/EtOAc (7 : 3) two times, yielding 3 subfractions. The subfractions obtained were submitted to antimicrobial assays against C. albicans. The most active subfraction was submitted to semipreparative HPLC separations carried out in a Shimadzu (LC-6AD apparatus, Japan) multisolvent delivery system, Shimadzu SPD-M10Avp Photodiode Array Detector, and an Intel Celeron computer for analytical system control, data collection and processing (software Class-VP). The separation was carried out using VP 250/10 NUCLEOSIL 120-5 C18 column eluted with acetonitrile/water/acetic acid (50 : 50 : 0.01) at a flow rate of 3 mL · min−1, yielding compounds 1 and 2. The isolated molecules were characterized by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic experiments recorded on a BRUKER DRX-400 spectrometer with CDCl3 as solvent and TMS as internal standard.

2.4. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration and Minimum Fungicide Concentration of Bioactive Compounds

After isolation and determination of the structure of the targeted compounds, they were evaluated for antimicrobial activity following the method described previously. Besides the MIC determination, we also evaluated the minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC). The MFC was determined by inoculating Sabouraud dextrose medium with 10 μL of the contents of each of the wells where there was growth inhibition of yeast, the MFC was defined as the lowest concentration of the substance capable of preventing the onset of colony forming units.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Actinobacteria Isolation and Identification

Several actinobacteria colonies were observed after incubation of isolation plates. We selected just one morphotype of each per ant colony, rendering a total of 24 strains ouf of 12 Trachymyrmex spp. nests (Table  S1). Four actinobacteria genera were identified and Streptomyces was the most abundant taxon (Table 1), corresponding to 66.67% of the strains. It is assumed that the main actinobacteria associated with the integument of attine workers is the genus Pseudonocardia [1416, 20]. However, several authors have demonstrated the isolation of actinobacteria other than Pseudonocardia on the integument of attine ants [1719, 21, 22, 29, 31]. The prevalence of Streptomyces and absence of Pseudonocardia among our isolates may be due to the culture medium used [44]. The SCN medium is suitable for the isolation of fast-growing actinobacteria, but according to other authors [1316], the use of a low-nutrient medium, such as chitin agar, may provide the recovery of Pseudonocardia strains.

Isolate Idbp1NCBI-GenBank closest relativeCoverage%Accession #

TD0161251Nocardia neocaledoniensis DSM 44717100100JF797311
TD0171248Nocardia neocaledoniensis DSM 44717100100JF797311
TD0181184Streptomyces zaomyceticus NRLL B-203899100NR044144
TD0191342Streptomyces alivochromogenes NBRC 340499100AB184761
TD0201167Streptomyces sannanensis NBRC 142399999NR041160
TD0211250Streptomyces mauvecolor NBRC 1385410099NR041154
TD0221254Streptomyces lydicus CGMCC 4.1412100100JN566018
TD0231246Streptomyces sp. QZGY-A17100100JQ812074
TD0251333Streptomyces sp. QLS9210099JQ838121
Streptomyces cirratus 10099JQ222143
TD0271342Streptomyces alivochromogenes NBRC 340499100AB184761
TD0281353Actinoplanes ferrugineus 10099AB048221
TD0301255Streptomyces sp. CA1310099AB622252
TD0321263Streptomyces chartreusis NBRC 12753100100NR041216
TD0331278Streptomyces griseoplanus 99100HQ699516
TD0341283Amycolatopsis decaplanina DSM 44594100100NR025562
TD0351320Streptomyces atriruber NRLL B-2467610099FJ169330
TD0451183Amycolatopsis equina 10099HQ021204
TD0471173Amycolatopsis albidoflavus NBRC100337100100AB327251
TD0491260Streptomyces luteogriseus NBRC 1340210099NR041128
TD0501261Streptomyces rubiginosohelvolus NBRC 12912100100NR041093
TD0511173Amycolatopsis albidoflavus NBRC100337100100AB327251
TD0531265Streptomyces kunmingensis NBRC144639998AB184597
TD0551173Amycolatopsis albidoflavus NBRC100337100100AB327251
TD0581257Streptomyces globisporus KCTC 9026100100HQ995504

bp: base pair.

In eight out of 12 ant colonies, we obtained more than one actinobacteria morphotype (Table S1). From colony CTL080820-02, the two morphotypes isolated from two different workers were identified as the same actinobacteria species (Tables  S1 and 1). On the other hand, different actinobacteria species were isolated in the seven remaining colonies. We also observed the occurrence of different actinobacteria strains in a single worker (Tables S1 and 1). This result demonstrates the diversity of actinobacteria present on the integument of these ants (Table S1, nests SES080911-04 and SES080924-01).

The 16S rDNA sequence of strain TD025 showed 99% similarity with sequences of several species of the genus Streptomyces deposited in the databases. For a better characterization, we performed a phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1). The result suggests a differentiated phylogenetic position for strain TD025 when compared with the remaining sequences. This preliminary analysis allowed us to assign this strain as belonging to the genus Streptomyces, with S. cirratus as the closest relative strain (Figure 1). However, more refined phylogenetic analyses, along with morphological and physiological studies, are necessary to ensure the identification of TD025 to the species level.

3.2. Screening for Antifungal Activity

Our screening for antifungal activity revealed that seven out of 24 extracts (29.16%) inhibited the growth of at least one Candida species. C. albicans was the most sensitive yeast and was inhibited by seven extracts with MIC ranging between 10 and 1000 μg · mL−1 (Table 2). The yeasts C. glabrata and C. tropicalis were the most resistant strains, being inhibited by one and two actinobacteria extracts, respectively, with MIC values of 1000 μg · mL−1 (Table 2).

Isolate IDC. albicans  C. dubliniensis C. glabrata C. krusei C. parapsilosis C. tropicalis
CBS 562CBS 7987CBS 138CBS 573CBS 604CBS 94

TD016* ** * * *
TD017* ** * * *
TD018* ** * * *
TD020* ** * * *
TD021* ** * * *
TD022800*1000* * *

Minimum inhibitory concentration > 1000 μg mL−1.

Except for strain TD034 identified as Amycolatopsis decaplanina (Table 1), the other actinobacteria exhibiting antimicrobial activity were identified as belonging to the genus Streptomyces. This genus is recognized as the largest producer of antibiotics because from approximately 3,000 known antibiotics obtained from actinobacteria, the genus Streptomyces contributes with 90% of this total [45].

The extracts of Streptomyces sp. TD025 and Streptomyces crystallinus TD027 showed activity against all yeast strains except for C. glabrata. These extracts were effective against C. albicans and C. krusei and showed low activity against C. tropicalis (Table 2). More interestingly, both strains were isolated from the same colony but from independent workers (Table 1). Because lower MICs were obtained for the extract of Streptomyces sp. TD025, this strain was selected to verify the chemical compounds responsible for the antimicrobial activity.

3.3. Bioactive Compounds of Streptomyces sp. TD025

Chromatographic procedures revealed that EtOAc extract from TD025 contains two compounds (1 and 2, Figure 2). Compounds 1 and 2 exhibited typical NMR data of urauchimycins (Figures S1 and S2). Their NMR data are in agreement with those previously reported by Imamura et al. [46]. Although these urauchimycins (1 and 2) have already been isolated, they have never been tested on various species of Candida as carried out in the present study.

The 13C NMR spectrum of 1 showed 22 carbon signals: four carbonyls (δ 179.0, δ 170.6, δ 169.8, and δ 158.7), three quaternary sp2 carbons (δ 150.6, δ 127.4, and δ 112.8), three methine aromatic carbons (δ 124.8, δ 120.6, and δ 119.0), two sp3 methylene group (δ 35.6 and δ 30.5), three sp3 methine groups (δ 54.0, δ 50.1, and δ 32.4), three oxymethinic groups (δ 77.1, δ 76.3, and δ 70.9), and four methyl groups (δ 18.4, δ 18.4, δ 15.1, and δ 11.4). Two carboxylic carbons δ 170.6 and δ 173.9 showed correlations with different hydrogens of the structure, showing a dilactone system of nine members, typical of the antimycin class.

The 1H NMR spectrum showed a singlet at δ 8.50, assigned to a hydrogen bounded to a carbonyl group and three aromatic hydrogens at δ 8.55 (dd, J 8.1 and 1.2 Hz), δ 7.24 (dd, J 8.1 and 1.2 Hz), and d 6.92 (t, J 8.1 Hz), suggesting a 1,2,3 trisubstituted aromatic ring. The substance was identified as urauchimycin A by comparison with the literature data [46].

The 1H and 13C NMR spectram of 2 were very similar to those observed for compound 1. Differences were observed in chemical shifts of the hydrogen of the methyl and methylene groups of the side chain. Based on published data [46] compound 2 was identified as Urauchimycin B, an isomer of compound 1.

Urauchimycins belong to the antimycin class, a group of well-known antifungals. Antimycins act by inhibiting the electron flow in the mitochondrial respiratory chain [47]. Antimycins have been previously identified in Streptomyces isolated from the integument of attine ants [3234]. Schoenian and colleagues [32] detected the well-know antimycins A1–A4 in 50% of the actinobacteria identified as Streptomyces isolated from workers of several Acromyrmex species. These data along with the rare antimycins identified in the present study indicate that this chemical class is often produced by Streptomyces associated with attine ants. Compounds belonging to this class may have an important role in the attine ant-microbe association.

Another antifungal compound widely distributed in Streptomyces associated with attine ants is candicidin [3134], which was not detected in Streptomyces sp. TD025. It is possible that candicidin was lost in one of the purification steps of the AcOEt extract or it is not produced by this strain.

Urauchimycins A and B were previously isolated from Streptomyces sp. Ni-80 isolated from a marine sponge in Urauchicove, Irimore, Japan. These substances were the first antimycins having an odd number of carbons and a branching side chain [46]. Imamura et al. [46] suggested that such structures are the result of an evolution of actinobacteria in the marine environment, which could have resulted in a change in their secondary metabolism.

In 2006, two new urauchimycins were described: urauchimycin C, isolated from Streptomyces sp. B1751 from marine sediment, and urauchimycin D, isolated from Streptomyces sp. AdM21 from soil [48]. In the study by Imamura and coworkers [46], the urauchimycins A and B inhibited the morphological differentiation of C. albicans up to a concentration of 10 µg   mL−1. Urauchimycins C and D showed no inhibitory activity against C. albicans, Mucor miehei, and bacteria [48].

The study of antimicrobial activity of urauchimycins A and B was restricted to C. albicans in the work by Imamura and colleagues [46]. The reisolation of these molecules in the present study allowed a better evaluation of its spectrum of activity. The urauchimycins from Streptomyces sp. TD025 presented MIC values equivalent to the reference antifungal nystatin for C. albicans and C. glabrata (Table 3). Urauchimycin B showed inhibitory activity against all Candida strains evaluated, showing MIC similar to those provided by nystatin.

Candida speciesUrauchimycin AUrauchimycin BNystatin

C. albicans 1*1312
C. dubliniensis 800*2312
C. glabrata 215,62211
C. krusei 15,615,62323
C. parapsilosis **2212
C. tropicalis **2244

>1000 μg mL−1.

Urauchimycin B showed a broad spectrum of activity against Candida spp. with MIC values equivalent to the antifungal nystatin, which indicates the potential for medical use. For many years, antimycins were used for the treatment of human infections, but due to its mechanism of action and associated side effects, its use in human treatment was discontinued [47]. However, with the pressing need for new antifungal agents that complement or substitute for the scarce products available on the market, it is interesting and necessary to determine the toxicity presented by urauchimycin B, to assess whether it can be used as an antifungal agent for humans and animals. In addition, evaluation of the isolated compound against Candida species resistant to commercially available antifungal agents should be performed to confirm the potential of this relatively unexplored antifungal.

Here we show that Trachymyrmex ants, one attine genus understudied with respect to its microbial symbionts, harbor antimicrobial-producing actinobacteria. As observed by other authors [2833], the present study demonstrates that actinobacteria of attine ants are able to produce antifungal compounds active against other fungal species and not only against the specific fungal parasite Escovopsis.

Moreover, our study corroborates previous work [35] that suggests the attine ant-microbe association is a promising source of microorganisms that produce active metabolites. The few recent studies that focused on the chemical characterization of bioactive compounds produced by actinobacteria associated with attine ants support the potential isolation of novel molecules with biological activity [2832]. Thus, an exploration program of isolation of bioactive molecules from actinobacteria from attine ants certainly will result in the discovery of novel compounds with activity against microorganisms that are potentially pathogenic to humans.

4. Conclusion

As suggested by Poulsen [35], we found that the integument of Trachymrymex ants is a potential source for the isolation of actinobacteria that produce bioactive molecules. The isolation of Urauchimycins A and B enabled, for the first time, the evaluation of their activity against various Candida species. Urauchimycin B showed a broad spectrum of activity and MIC values equivalent to the reference antifungal nystatin. Toxicity studies and in vivo activity should be carried out in order to verify the potential use of this molecule in the treatment of fungal infections.


The authors thank FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo), CNPq/INCT (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), and NSF IRFP (United States National Science Foundation International Research Fellowship Program no. 07012333) for financial support. The authors also thank CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior) for providing a scholarship to the first author. This work was conducted under collecting permit number 14789-1 issued by the “Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis” (IBAMA) and the “Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade” (ICMBio). The authors also thank two anonymous referees for helpful comments on this paper.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1: Actinobacteria strains used in the present study.

Figure S1: 1H NMR of Urauchimycin A (CDCl3, 400 MHz).

Figure S2: 1H NMR of Urauchimycin B (CDCl3, 400 MHz).

  1. Supplementary Material


  1. J. Travis, “Reviving the antibiotic miracle?” Nature, vol. 264, no. 5157, pp. 360–362, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  2. S. Miyadoh, “Research on antibiotic screening in Japan over the last decade: a producing microorganism approach,” Actinomycetologica, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 100–106, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  3. G. L. Challis and D. A. Hopwood, “Synergy and contingency as driving forces for the evolution of multiple secondary metabolite production by Streptomyces species,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 24, pp. 14555–14561, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  4. M. Goodfellow and H. P. Fiedler, “A guide to successful bioprospecting: informed by actinobacterial systematics,” Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 119–142, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. C. W. Waugh and P. F. Long, “Prospects for generating new antibiotics,” Science Progress, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 73–88, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  6. J. Clardy, M. A. Fischbach, and C. T. Walsh, “New antibiotics from bacterial natural products,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1541–1550, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. T. K. Kim, A. K. Hewavitharana, P. N. Shaw, and J. A. Fuerst, “Discovery of a new source of rifamycin antibiotics in marine sponge actinobacteria by phylogenetic prediction,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 2118–2125, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. Gandhimathi, M. Arunkumar, J. Selvin et al., “Antimicrobial potential of sponge associated marine actinomycetes,” Journal de Mycologie Medicale, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 16–22, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. E. J. Choi, H. C. Kwon, J. Ham, and H. O. Yang, “6-Hydroxymethyl-1-phenazine-carboxamide and 1,6-phenazinedimethanol from a marine bacterium, Brevibacterium sp. KMD 003, associated with marine purple vase sponge,” Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 621–624, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. B. Bieber, J. Nuske, M. Ritzau, and U. Grafe, “Alnumycin a new naphthoquinone antibiotic produced by an endophytic Streptomyces sp.,” Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 381–382, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  11. U. F. Castillo, G. A. Strobel, E. J. Ford et al., “Munumbicins, wide-spectrum antibiotics produced by Streptomyces NRRL 30562, endophytic on Kennedia nigriscans,” Microbiology, vol. 148, no. 9, pp. 2675–2685, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  12. D. Ezra, U. F. Castillo, G. A. Strobel et al., “Coronamycins, peptide antibiotics produced by a verticillate Streptomyces sp. (MSU-2110) endophytic on Monstera sp.,” Microbiology, vol. 150, no. 4, pp. 785–793, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  13. C. R. Currie, J. A. Scottt, R. C. Summerbell, and D. Malloch, “Fungus-growing ants use antibiotic-producing bacteria to control garden parasites,” Nature, vol. 398, no. 6729, pp. 701–704, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C. R. Currie, J. A. Scott, R. C. Summerbell, and D. Malloch, “Corrigendum: fungus-growing ants use antibiotic-producing bacteria to control garden parasites,” Nature, vol. 423, no. 6938, p. 461, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  15. M. J. Cafaro, M. Poulsen, A. E. F. Little et al., “Specificity in the symbiotic association between fungus-growing ants and protective Pseudonocardia bacteria,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 278, no. 1713, pp. 1814–1822, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. J. Cafaro and C. R. Currie, “Phylogenetic analysis of mutualistic filamentous bacteria associated with fungus-growing ants,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 441–446, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. Kost, T. Lakatos, I. Böttcher, W. R. Arendholz, M. Redenbach, and R. Wirth, “Non-specific association between filamentous bacteria and fungus-growing ants,” Naturwissenschaften, vol. 94, no. 10, pp. 821–828, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. U. G. Mueller, D. Dash, C. Rabeling, and A. Rodrigues, “Coevolution between attine ants and actinomycete bacteria: a reevaluation,” Evolution, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 2894–2912, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. U. G. Mueller, “Symbiont recruitment versus ant-symbiont co-evolution in the attine ant-microbe symbiosis,” Current Opinion in Microbiology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 269–277, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  20. M. Poulsen, M. Cafaro, J. J. Boomsma, and C. R. Currie, “Specificity of the mutualistic association between actinomycete bacteria and two sympatric species of Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 3597–3604, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. D. Zucchi, A. S. Guidolin, and F. L. Cônsoli, “Isolation and characterization of actinobacteria ectosymbionts from Acromyrmex subterraneus brunneus (Hymenoptera, Formicidae),” Microbiological Research, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 68–76, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  22. R. Sen, H. D. Ishak, D. Estrada, S. E. Dowd, E. Hong, and U. G. Mueller, “Generalized antifungal activity and 454-screening of Pseudonocardia and Amycolatopsis bacteria in nests of fungus-growing ants,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 42, pp. 17805–17810, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Kaltenpoth, W. Göttler, G. Herzner, and E. Strohm, “Symbiotic bacteria protect wasp larvae from fungal infestation,” Current Biology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 475–479, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Kaltenpoth, W. Goettler, C. Dale et al., “Candidatus Streptomyces philanthi, an endosymbiotic streptomycete in the antennae of Philanthus digger wasps,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1403–1411, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. J. Scott, D. C. Oh, M. C. Yuceer, K. D. Klepzig, J. Clardy, and C. R. Currie, “Bacterial protection of beetle-fungus mutualism,” Science, vol. 322, no. 5898, p. 63, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. R. V. vander Meer, “Ant interactions with soil organisms and associated semiochemicals,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 728–745, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  27. C. R. Currie, “Prevalence and impact of a virulent parasite on a tripartite mutualism,” Oecologia, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 99–106, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. D. C. Oh, M. Poulsen, C. R. Currie et al., “Dentigerumycin: a bacterial mediator of an ant-fungus symbiosis,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 391–393, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  29. J. Barke, R. F. Seipke, S. Grüschow et al., “A mixed community of actinomycetes produce multiple antibiotics for the fungus farming ant Acromyrmex octospinosus,” BMC Biology, vol. 8, article 109, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. G. Carr, E. R. Derbyshire, E. Caldera et al., “Antibiotic and antimalarial quinones from fungus-growing ant-associated Pseudonocardia sp.,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 75, no. 10, pp. 1806–1809, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  31. S. Haeder, R. Wirth, H. Herz, and D. Spiteller, “Candicidin-producing Streptomyces support leaf-cutting ants to protect their fungus garden against the pathogenic fungus Escovopsis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 12, pp. 4742–4746, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. I. I. Schoenian, M. M. Spiteller, M. J. Manoj et al., “Chemical basis of the synergism and antagonism in microbial communities in the nests of leaf-cutting ants,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 1955–1960, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. R. F. Seipke, J. Barke, C. Brearley et al., “A single Streptomyces symbiont makes multiple antifungals to support the fungus farming ant Acromyrmex octospinosus,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 8, Article ID e22028, 8 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. F. R. Seipke, S. Gruschow, R. J. Goss, and M. I. Hutchings, “Isolating antifungals from fungus-growing ant symbionts using a genome-guided chemistry approach,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 517, pp. 47–70, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  35. M. Poulsen, “Biomedical exploitation of the fungus-growing ant symbiosis,” Drug News and Perspectives, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 203–210, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. E. Küster and S. T. Williams, “Selection of media for isolation of streptomycetes,” Nature, vol. 202, no. 4935, pp. 928–929, 1964. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. J. P. Sampaio, M. Gadanho, S. Santos et al., “Polyphasic taxonomy of the basidiomycetous yeast genus Rhodosporidium: Rhodosporidium kratochvilovae and related anamorphic species,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 687–697, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  38. D. J. Lane, “16S/23S RNAr sequencing,” in Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematic, E. Stackebrandt and M. Goodfellow, Eds., pp. 115–175, John Willey, New York, NY, USA, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  39. T. A. Hall, “BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/97/NT,” Nucleic Acids Symposium Series, vol. 41, pp. 95–98, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  40. D. L. Swofford, PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*: and other Methods), Version 4, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass, USA, 2002.
  41. M. Kimura, “A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 111–120, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  42. S. M. Bomfim, Isolamento de metabólitos antifúngicos de Streptomyces sp., UFPEDA, 3347, endófito de Momordica charantia L., (Curcubitaceae) [M.S. thesis], Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil, 2008.
  43. CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute), “Norma Aprovada M27-A2,” Método de referência para testes de diluição em caldo para determinação da sensibilidade de leveduras à terapia antifúngica, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  44. C. N. Seong, J. H. Choi, and K. S. Baik, “An improved selective isolation of rare Actinomycetes from forest soil,” Journal of Microbiology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  45. M. G. Watve, R. Tickoo, M. M. Jog, and B. D. Bhole, “How many antibiotics are produced by the genus Streptomyces?” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 176, no. 5, pp. 386–390, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. N. Imamura, M. Nishijima, K. Adachi, and H. Sano, “Novel antimycin antibiotics, urauchimycins A and B, produced by marine actinomycete,” Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 241–246, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  47. C. J. Barrow, J. J. Oleynek, H. H. Sun et al., “Antimycins, inhibitors of ATP-citrate lyase, from a Streptomyces sp.,” Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 729–733, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  48. C. B. F. Yao, M. Schiebel, E. Helmke, H. Anke, and H. Laatsch, “Prefluostatin and new urauchimycin derivatives produced by Streptomycete isolates,” Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung B, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 320–325, 2006. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Thais D. Mendes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.