Research Article | Open Access
Tomoko Nakanishi, Rumiko Saito, Makoto Taniguchi, Haruka Oda, Atsumi Soma, Mayu Yasunaga, Mariko Yamane, Kenzo Sato, "In Vivo Determination of Vitamin D Function Using Transgenic Mice Carrying a Human Osteocalcin Luciferase Reporter Gene", BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 895706, 6 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/895706
In Vivo Determination of Vitamin D Function Using Transgenic Mice Carrying a Human Osteocalcin Luciferase Reporter Gene
Vitamin D is an essential factor for ossification, and its deficiency causes rickets. Osteocalcin, which is a noncollagenous protein found in bone matrix and involved in mineralization and calcium ion homeostasis, is one of the major bone morphogenetic markers and is used in the evaluation of osteoblast maturation and osteogenic activation. We established transgenic mouse line expressing luciferase under the control of a 10-kb osteocalcin enhancer/promoter sequence. Using these transgenic mice, we evaluated the active forms of vitamins D2 and D3 for their bone morphogenetic function by in vivo bioluminescence. As the result, strong activity for ossification was observed with 1α,25-hydroxyvitamin D3. Our mouse system can offer a feasible detection method for assessment of osteogenic activity in the development of functional foods and medicines by noninvasive screening.
Vitamin D is an essential factor for ossification, including activation of calcium absorption in the intestine, inhibition of calcium release in the kidney, and promotion of osteogenesis in bone. Indeed, vitamin D deficiency is well known to induce bone-softening diseases, such as rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults [1, 2]. Vitamin D is generated as previtamin D from 7-dehydrocholesterol by ultraviolet light irradiation of the mammalian skin and absorbed from various foods . Animal foods contain vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), while vegetable foods are enriched in vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol). The active form of vitamin D, 1α,25-hydroxyvitamin D [1α,25(OH)2D], is converted from previtamin D in the liver followed by the kidney [4, 5].
Osteocalcin, which is a noncollagenous protein found in bone matrix and involved in mineralization and calcium ion homeostasis, is one of the major bone morphogenetic markers and is used in the evaluation of osteoblast maturation and osteogenic activation [6–8]. The osteocalcin gene is regulated by various growth factors, hormones, cytokines, and vitamins. Basic fibroblast growth factor , bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 [10, 11], and parathyroid hormone  are the major positive regulatory factors for osteocalcin gene expression, as well as vitamin D. The promoter region of the osteocalcin gene contains some transcriptional regulatory elements, such as the AP-1/VDRE (AV) element composed of a vitamin D-responsive element (VDRE), retinoic acid-responsive element (RE), and Jun-Fos-responsive AP-1 , as well as osteoblast-specific factor-binding elements (OSE1 and OSE2) . The vitamin D receptor activated by association of vitamin D promotes transcription of the osteocalcin gene through interaction with a VDRE in the promoter of the gene .
Previously, we produced a transgenic mouse line expressing luciferase under the control of a 10-kb human osteocalcin enhancer/promoter sequence. This mouse line was backcrossed with a hairless mouse line to enable us to monitor bone formation during growth, fracture repair, and aging using in vivo imaging, without sacrificing the mice . Using this system, we evaluated vitamin D function using osteocalcin gene expression as an indicator.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ethics Statement
All of the animal experiments described were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tottori University (Permission nos. 18-2-42 and 09-Y-64). All the mice received humane care in compliance with Tottori University’s guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals in research.
2.2. Cell Culture and Reporter Assays
MG-63 human osteosarcoma cells and HeLa cells were cultured in Eagle’s minimal essential medium and Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA), 100 U/mL penicillin (Meiji Seika Pharma Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin (Meiji Seika Pharma Co. Ltd.) at 37°C under 5% CO2 in air. For luciferase reporter assays, 2 g of pOC-Luc (luciferase gene with the human osteocalcin enhancer/promoter) or pΔOC-Luc (luciferase gene without the osteocalcin enhancer/promoter) was cotransfected into MG-63 or HeLa cells () using TransIT-LT1 (Mirus Bio LLC, Madison, WI) with 0.1 g of pRL-TK (TOYO B-Net, Tokyo, Japan), a plasmid carrying the Renilla luciferase gene driven by the thymidine kinase minimal promoter as an internal control. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) as the vehicle or 1 nM of previtamin D2 (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), previtamin D3 (Sigma-Aldrich), 1α,25(OH)2D2 (Sigma-Aldrich), and 1 nM 1α,25(OH)2D3 (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) in DMSO (0.01% final DMSO concentration) were added at the same time as the transfection. At 24 h after the transfection, the cells were solubilized and the luciferase activities were measured using a Pikkagene Dual Luciferase Assay System (TOYO B-Net). The firefly luciferase activity was normalized by the Renilla luciferase activity in the same sample.
2.3. In Vivo Luminescence Imaging
Hairless human osteocalcin enhancer/promoter-luciferase transgenic mice (OC-Luc Tg mice)  were anesthetized with isoflurane (DS Pharma Animal Health Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan) at 8–11 months of age and then injected subcutaneously with luciferin (Promega, Madison, WI) at a dose of 160 mg/kg body weight (40 mg/mL luciferin). After 8 min, the mice were placed on their ventral surface, and images of the luciferase activity were continuously acquired every 3 min until the maximal activity was detected using an IVIS Lumina Imaging System (Xenogen Corp., Alameda, CA). The luciferase activity tended to reach its peak at around 15 min. To analyze the responsiveness to previtamin D3 (Sigma-Aldrich Co.), previtamin D2 (Sigma-Aldrich Co.), 1α,25(OH)2D3 (Merck KGaA), and 1α,25(OH)2D2 (Sigma-Aldrich Co.), the luciferase activity was measured at 0, 6, 9, and 24 h after oral administration of each agent at a dose of 2 ng/g body weight. The acquired images were analyzed using Live Image 2.6 software (Xenogen Corp.) to quantify the luciferase activity.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using StatView (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). The Student’s -test was used to analyze the difference between the study and control groups.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Response of the Human Osteocalcin Enhancer/Promoter-Luciferase Construct to 1α,25(OH)2D3 In Vitro
We previously constructed a plasmid expressing luciferase under the control of a 10-kb human osteocalcin enhancer/promoter sequence (pOC-Luc) (Figure 1(a)) . Osteocalcin is a gene that is predominantly expressed in bone-associated tissues. The fragment contains a VDRE, a GAGA DNA motif, which is suggested to control the 1α,25(OH)2D3 responsiveness of the rat osteocalcin gene [17, 18], as well as a TATA box. The osteocalcin translation start codon, ATG, was fused to the ATG of the luciferase gene. To insulate the transgenes from chromosomal position effects in the transgenic mice, two copies of the 1.2-kb chicken -globin 5′-HS4 element were inserted at both ends.
The regulation of pOC-Luc was monitored by its luciferase activity following transfection into MG-63 cells. The MG-63 cell line is a well-characterized human osteoblast-like cell line that shows 1α,25(OH)2D3-dependent stimulation of osteocalcin production [16, 19]. The luciferase activity of pOC-Luc was high compared with that of pOCΔ-Luc, containing approximately 60 bp of the 5′-untranslated sequence. When the transfected cells were treated with 1α,25(OH)2D3 and 1α,25(OH)2D2, the luciferase activity of pOC-Luc was stimulated by approximately 10- and 2-fold, respectively (Figure 1(b)). On the other hand, there was no stimulation by previtamin D3 and D2 treatment. In HeLa cells, the pOC-Luc activity and the induction by 1α,25(OH)2D3 and 1α,25(OH)2D2 was less compared to MG-63 cells (Figure 1(b)). These findings suggest that pOC-Luc would be a useful tool for measuring bone-specific 1α,25(OH)2D3 induction of the human osteocalcin gene.
3.2. Effects of Oral Administration of Vitamins D3 and D2 on Osteocalcin Gene Expression in OC-Luc Tg Mice
We previously established a transgenic mouse line, OC-Luc Tg, harboring the human osteocalcin enhancer/promoter-luciferase gene derived from pOC-Luc . When the OC-Luc Tg mouse line was backcrossed to a hairless mouse line, bioluminescence was observed along the bones after luciferin administration by in vivo imaging . Consistent with the response of MG-63 cells to 1α,25(OH)2D3, the bioluminescence of the whole body of OC-Luc Tg mice after intraperitoneal injection of 1α,25(OH)2D3 was more than twice that measured in mice treated with vehicle .
To compare the effects of 1α,25(OH)2D3, previtamin D3, 1α,25(OH)2D2, and previtamin D2 on the bone formation activity, we aimed to measure the alterations in human osteocalcin expression after oral administration of these agents to OC-Luc Tg mice. The bioluminescence of the whole body of OC-Luc Tg mice at 6 h after oral administration of 1α,25(OH)2D3 was more than twice those measured in mice treated with previtamin D3 or vehicle (Figure 2(a)). When the bioluminescence was measured at 6 h after oral administration of 1α,25(OH)2D2, weak induction was observed, similar to the case for mice treated with previtamin D2 or vehicle (Figure 2(a)). As shown in Figure 2(b), the increase in bioluminescence induced by 1α,25(OH)2D3 reached its maximum level at 6–9 h after oral administration and returned to the control levels by 24 h, as previously reported [16, 20], whereas weak induction was observed within 24 h after 1α,25(OH)2D2 administration. These findings indicate that only 1α,25(OH)2D3 is effective for increasing the bone formation activity after a single oral administration to OC-Luc Tg mice, compared with 1α,25(OH)2D2, previtamin D3, and previtamin D2.
The bone-mobilizing activity of 1α,25(OH)2D2 was reported to be lower than expected from its vitamin D receptor (VDR) affinity, which is only 3 times less than that of 1α,25(OH)2D3 . Differential metabolism is a potential mechanism for the analog selectivity. Therefore, it is possible that 1α,25(OH)2D2 may be catabolized more rapidly in bone. Another possible explanation for the difference in action between 1α,25(OH)2D3 and 1α,25(OH)2D2 is that 1α,25(OH)2D2 does not mimic 1α,25(OH)2D3 in upregulating the VDR. In addition, there is a lack of clarity in the literature as to whether there is a definitive difference between the effects of vitamins D2 and D3 on raising the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in humans . The precise processes that increase the bone formation activity through vitamins D3 and D2 currently remain unclear. It may be important to evaluate the differences between vitamins D3 and D2 utilizing an indicator related to a specific biological process.
In the transgenic mice harboring human osteocalcin enhancer/promoter luciferase reporter gene, strong osteogenic activity was observed by 1α,25(OH)2D3 administration, compared with 1α,25(OH)2D2, as well as previtamins D2 and D3. Our mouse system would offer a feasible detection method for assessing osteogenic activity in the development of functional foods and medicines by noninvasive screening.
The authors wish to thank Dr. Naohiro Hori and their laboratory members for technical assistance and valuable discussions. This study was supported in part by a City Area Program (basic stage), a Regional Innovation Cluster Program from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT).
- M. F. Holick, “Vitamin D deficiency,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 357, no. 3, pp. 266–281, 2007.
- D. D. Bikle, “Vitamin D and bone,” Current Osteoporosis Reports, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 151–159, 2012.
- M. F. Holick, J. A. MacLaughlin, and M. B. Clark, “Photosynthesis of previtamin D3 in human skin and the physiologic consequences,” Science, vol. 210, no. 4466, pp. 203–205, 1980.
- M. F. Holick, “Resurrection of vitamin D deficiency and rickets,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 116, no. 8, pp. 2062–2072, 2006.
- M. F. Holick and M. Garabedian, “Vitamin D: photobiology, metabolism, mechanism of action, and clinical applications,” in Primer on the Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism, M. J. Favus, Ed., pp. 129–137, American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, Washington, DC, USA, 6th edition, 2006.
- R. M. Locklin, R. O. C. Oreffo, and J. T. Triffitt, “Modulation of osteogenic differentiation in human skeletal cells in vitro by 5-azacytidine,” Cell Biology International, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 207–215, 1998.
- J. Lemonnier, C. Ghayor, J. Guicheux, and J. Caverzasio, “Protein kinase C-independent activation of protein kinase D is involved in BMP-2-induced activation of stress mitogen-activated protein kinases JNK and p38 and osteoblastic cell differentiation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 1, pp. 259–264, 2004.
- S. L. Ferrari, L. Ahn-Luong, P. Garnero, S. E. Humphries, and S. L. Greenspan, “Two promoter polymorphisms regulating interleukin-6 gene expression are associated with circulating levels of C-reactive protein and markers of bone resorption in postmenopausal women,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 255–259, 2003.
- M. Bodo, C. Lilli, C. Bellucci et al., “Basic fibroblast growth factor autocrine loop controls human osteosarcoma phenotyping and differentiation,” Molecular Medicine, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 393–404, 2002.
- A. Yamaguchi, T. Ishizuya, N. Kintou et al., “Effects of BMP-2, BMP-4, and BMP-6 on osteoblastic differentiation of bone marrow-derived stromal cell lines, ST2 and MC3T3-G2/PA6,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 220, no. 2, pp. 366–371, 1996.
- A. Yamaguchi, T. Komori, and T. Suda, “Regulation of osteoblast differentiation mediated by bone morphogenetic proteins, hedgehogs, and Cbfa1,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 393–411, 2000.
- X. P. Yu and S. Chandrasekhar, “Parathyroid hormone (PTH 1-34) regulation of rat osteocalcin gene transcription,” Endocrinology, vol. 138, no. 8, pp. 3085–3092, 1997.
- R. Schüle, K. Umesono, D. J. Mangelsdorf, J. Bolado, J. W. Pike, and R. M. Evans, “Jun-Fos and receptors for vitamins A and D recognize a common response element in the human osteocalcin gene,” Cell, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 497–504, 1990.
- F. Yeung, W. K. Law, C. H. Yeh et al., “Regulation of human osteocalcin promoter in hormone-independent human prostate cancer cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 4, pp. 2468–2476, 2002.
- K. Ozono, J. Liao, S. A. Kerner, R. A. Scott, and J. W. Pike, “The vitamin D-responsive element in the human osteocalcin gene. Association with a nuclear proto-oncogene enhancer,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 265, no. 35, pp. 21881–21888, 1990.
- T. Nakanishi, K. Kokubun, H. Oda et al., “Bioluminescence imaging of bone formation using hairless osteocalcin-luciferase transgenic mice,” Bone, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 369–375, 2012.
- N. A. Morrison, J. Shine, J. C. Fragonas, V. Verkest, M. L. McMenemy, and J. A. Eisman, “1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D-responsive element and glucocorticoid repression in the osteocalcin gene,” Science, vol. 246, no. 4934, pp. 1158–1161, 1989.
- K. Yoon, S. J. C. Rutledge, R. F. Buenaga, and G. A. Rodan, “Characterization of the rat osteocalcin gene: stimulation of promoter activity by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3,” Biochemistry, vol. 27, no. 23, pp. 8521–8526, 1988.
- L. F. Bonewald, M. B. Kester, Z. Schwartz et al., “Effects of combining transforming growth factor β and 1,25- dihydroxyvitamin D3 on differentiation of a human osteosarcoma (MG-63),” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 267, no. 13, pp. 8943–8949, 1992.
- N. A. Sims, C. P. White, K. L. Sunn et al., “Human and murine osteocalcin gene expression: conserved tissue restricted expression and divergent responses to 1,25- dihydroxyvitamin D3 in vivo,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1695–1708, 1997.
- J. L. Finch, A. J. Brown, and E. Slatopolsky, “Differential effects of 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D3 and 19-nor-1,25- dihydroxy-vitamin D2 on calcium and phosphorus resorption in bone,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 980–985, 1999.
- L. Tripkovic, H. Lambert, K. Hart et al., “Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 1357–1364, 2012.
Copyright © 2013 Tomoko Nakanishi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.