BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Immunology and Cell Biology of Parasitic Diseases 2013

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 952416 |

Yan Cao, Bin Zhao, Yanhui Han, Juan Zhang, Xuezhen Li, Chunhui Qiu, Xiujuan Wu, Yang Hong, Dezhou Ai, Jiaojiao Lin, Zhiqiang Fu, "Gene Gun Bombardment with DNA-Coated Golden Particles Enhanced the Protective Effect of a DNA Vaccine Based on Thioredoxin Glutathione Reductase of Schistosoma japonicum", BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 952416, 10 pages, 2013.

Gene Gun Bombardment with DNA-Coated Golden Particles Enhanced the Protective Effect of a DNA Vaccine Based on Thioredoxin Glutathione Reductase of Schistosoma japonicum

Academic Editor: Luis I. Terrazas
Received18 Jun 2012
Revised19 Aug 2012
Accepted09 Sep 2012
Published31 Dec 2012


Schistosomiasis, caused by infection with Schistosoma species, remains an important parasitic zoonosis. Thioredoxin glutathione reductase of Schistosoma japonicum (SjTGR) plays an important role in the development of the parasite and for its survival. Here we present a recombinant plasmid DNA vaccine, pVAX1/SjTGR, to estimate its protection against S. japonicum in BALB/c mice. The DNA vaccine administrated by particle bombardment induced higher protection than by intramuscular injection. All animals vaccinated with pVAX1/SjTGR developed significant specific anti-SjTGR antibodies than control groups. Moreover, animals immunized by gene gun exhibited a splenocyte proliferative response, with an increase in IFN-γ and IL-4. The recombinant plasmid administrated by gene gun achieved a medium protective efficacy of 27.83–38.83% () of worm reduction and 40.38–44.51% () of liver egg count reduction. It suggests that different modes of administering a DNA vaccine can influence the protective efficacy induced by the vaccine. Interestingly, from the enzymatic activity results, we found that worms obtained from pVAX1/SjTGR-vaccinated animals expressed lower enzymatic activity than the control group and the antibodies weakened the enzymatic activity of SjTGR in vitro, too. It implies that the high-level antibodies may contribute to the protective effects.

1. Introduction

Schistosomiasis is an important disease distributed in many parts of the world, most of which are the places with poor sanitation or irrigation areas, and it is estimated that 779 million people are at risk of schistosomiasis [1]. S. japonicum is the most difficult form of schistosomiasis to control among the 5 Schistosoma species which infect humans [24]. Schistosomiasis is a chronic and debilitating disease [5, 6] which is always accompanied by emaciation and anemia, and even death.

Over the past decades of years, the Chinese government has implemented several control programs, including community-based praziquantel chemotherapy [7], health education, improved sanitation, environmental modification, and snail control. However, schistosomiasis remains an important public health concern in China. As snail control [8] is always difficult to achieve, and praziquantel has no effect on reinfection [9, 10], the disease is difficult to control. Therefore, a complementary approach to integrate chemotherapy, vaccination for example, is needed.

Since the 20th century, scientists have been trying to develop an effect vaccine against S. japonicum for field use [1113], mainly for yellow cattle and water buffalos. Through decades of efforts, several kinds of vaccines have been developed, including cercariae-attenuated vaccines [14], natural or recombinant protein vaccines, nucleic acid vaccines, and multivalent affiliate vaccines. Currently, DNA vaccines have received increased attention and are considered advantageous compared to other vaccine preparations [15, 16], for low cost and easy preparation. However, the mode of delivering a DNA vaccine can influence the effect induced by the vaccine [17].

The schistosome tegument is a single syncytium that covers the surface of the parasite body [18]. Although there remains many unresolved questions in relation to the structure and function of the tegument, the dynamic host-interactive layer tegument is believed to involve in nutrient uptake, immune evasion and modulation, sensory reception, and signal transduction, and is important from a vaccine perspective [1922]. A number of described vaccine candidates are membrane proteins [23, 24], muscle proteins [25], and enzymes [2628]. Thioredoxin glutathione reductase of S. japonicum (SjTGR) is also a tegument antigen mainly distributed in the tegument of adult worms [29]. Adult schistosome worms, which reside in the hepatic portal system, are exposed to reactive oxygen compounds from metabolism and the host immune response. In eukaryocyte, two major systems, the thioredoxin (Trx) system and the glutathione (GSH) system, exist to detoxify reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, it has been proved that there are no separate Trx reductase and GSH reductase enzymes in S. japonicum, instead of the linked thioredoxin-glutathione system (TGR) [30]. As such, this union enzyme, thioredoxin glutathione reductase, is thought to be an attractive vaccine antigen candidate.

In this paper, a recombinant DNA plasmid was constructed containing a complete open reading fragment of SjTGR and immunized with two different modes, particle bombardment, and needle inoculation to evaluate the ability to protect BALB/c mice against S. japonicum challenge and explore the conceivable immune protective mechanism.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Experimental Mice and Parasites

Male BALB/c mice, 6–8 weeks old, were purchased from Slac Animal Laboratory (Shanghai, China). The freshwater snail, Oncomelania hupensis, was maintained in the Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Cercariae were collected by exposing infected snails to light and the number and viability of cercariae were determined under a light microscope before challenge. Animal care and all procedures involving animals were conducted according to the principles of Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Specific anti-SjTGR serum was collected from BALB/c mice thrice immunized with recombinant protein SjTGR.

2.2. Construction of Recombinant Plasmid DNA

The eukaryotic expression plasmid, pVAX1, which contains the strong cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter and bovine growth hormone (BGH) polyadenylation signal, was used as the vector. The entire SjTGR open reading fragment was amplified from the S. japonicum adult worm cDNA library, with primers: 5′-CGCGGATCCATGCCTCCGATTGAT-3′ and 5′-GCCTCGAGTCAGCAACCGGTTACC-3′ and subcloned into cleaved pVAX1 to construct the recombinant expression plasmid, pVAX1/SjTGR.

The recombinant plasmid was sequenced to ensure the insert sequence was cloned correctly. Then, the expression plasmid was transferred into DH5, a type of competent cell, for large-scale preparation and purification using a Qiagen Plasmid Maxi Kit (Qiagen), followed by the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.3. Expression in 293T Cells

Transfections of plasmid (pVAX1/SjTGR, pVAX1) were done by Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol to detect gene expression in 293T cells. One day before transfection, cells were plated into a 6-well plate in 2 mL/well of growth medium without antibiotics so that the cells will be 90%–95% confluent when transfection was performed. For each well, 5 L Lipofectamine 2000 and 10 g DNA were mixed gently and incubated for 20 min at room temperature. Then, the complex was volume to 2 mL with Opti-MEM and added to the monolayer of cells in each well.

After incubating cells at 37°C in a 5% incubator for 48 h, the monolayer cells were fixed with 80% ethanol, and thrice washed with PBS-0.05%/Tween-20 (PBST). Specific anti-SjTGR serum was added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 2 h, then thrice washed with PBST. After that, Cy3-labeled goat anti-mouse antibodies (Beyotime) were used as secondary antibodies at a dilution of 1 : 5000 and added to each well. After 1 h incubation at 37°C keeping in dark, the plates were thrice washed again. Finally, the potential protein in the cells was detected using a converted fluorescence microscope. The tests were assayed in triplicate.

2.4. Immunization with the Helios Gene Gun System

Cartridges were prepared prior to the day of the experiments, followed by general methods [31]. First, the amount of DNA and gold required for each transformation was calculated. The DNA loading ratio (DLR) used was 5 g DNA/mg gold, and the microcarrier loading quantity (MLQ) was 0.5 mg/cartridge. For the duration of producing bullets, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) (Sigma) served as an adhesive. At higher discharge pressures from the nitrogen source, DNA mixed with nanolevel gold particle was coated in the walls of the tubes (BioRad) and is referred to as bullet. Similarly, at higher discharge pressures from the helium source, murine abdominal epidermis was bombarded with the Helios gene gun system (BioRad). The optimum pressure for mice was determined to occur at 600 psi.

2.5. Immunization Schedule and Challenge Infection

Two mice vaccinations were carried out in this study. In trail 1, fifty-male BALB/c mice were randomly divided into 5 groups (10 each group, pVAX1/i.m., pVAX1/SjTGR/i.m., pVAX1/g.g., pVAX1/SjTGR/g.g., PBS). All mice were given 2 intramuscular immunizations 3 weeks apart called prime-boost inoculation by two different modes, particle bombardment and needle inoculation. In trail 2, forty-five male BALB/c mice were randomly divided into 3 groups (15 each group, pVAX1/g.g., pVAX1/SjTGR/g.g., and PBS) and immunized with a gene gun with the same schedule. Ten days after each immunization in the trail 2, blood from each animal was collected. Serums were separated and stored at −20°C for antibody assays and cytokine detections. Two weeks later, mice in each group of the two trails were infected with   S. japonicum cercaria and sacrificed 6 weeks after challenge and blood was collected. The total worm and liver egg burden was determined (Figure 1).

2.6. Detection of Specific Antibodies in Serum by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

In trail 2, the levels of specific IgG antibodies against SjTGR were detected by ELISA following standard methods [32]. A 96-well flat-bottomed plate was coated with recombinant protein SjTGR at 4°C overnight (1 g/well), thrice washed with PBS-0.05%/Tween-20 (PBST), blocked with 150 L/well of PBST-1.5% (m/v) normal bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 2 h at room temperature (25°C), then thrice washed with PBST. The serum samples collected in the previous section were diluted with PBST in 1 : 100, added to the plate (100 L/well), incubated at 37°C for 2 h, and thrice washed again with PBST. Horseradish peroxidase labeled goat anti-mouse IgG, IgG1, and IgG2a (BD Pharmingen) were used as secondary antibodies at a dilution of 1 : 5000 and added at 100 L/well. After a 1 h incubation at 37°C, the plates were thrice washed and the substrate, 3,3′5,5′-tetramethyl benzidine dihydrochloride (TMB), was added (100 L/well). The plates were incubated for 10 min at room temperature in the dark and the reaction was stopped using 2 M (50 L/well). All of the samples were assayed in triplicate. The results were detected in a microplate reader (BioTek) and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm.

2.7. Calculation of the Percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ Cells and Cytokine Determination by Flow Cytometry

Five mice in each group in trail 2 were sacrificed 2 weeks after the booster immunization and splenocytes were collected. 1 mL RPMI 1640 medium (Gbico) with 10% FBS was added to each spleen and grinded. After grinding, 1.5 mL FACS lysing solution (BD Pharmingen) was added to the cells, and thrice washed by centrifuging at 3000 g for 5 min at 4°C. The cells were adjusted to 107/mL and cultured overnight and the next day stimulated with 2.5 L (1 L/mL) PMA (Sigma) 2 L (1 g/mL) Ionomycin (Sigma) and 3.4 L Monensin (eBioscience), for 6 h at 37°C in a 5%   incubator. Then, 0.25 g PE-labeled Cy5 CD3 and 0.25 g PE-labeled Cy7 CD8 (BD Pharmingen) were added to each sample, and incubated at 25°C for 20 min at dark, thrice washed as usual. Then 1 mL dyeing buffer was used to wash the cells for three times as usual. After that, 0.5 mL cell-fixed liquid was added to each sample for 20 min and washed thrice as usual. Cells were resuspended with 100 L permeabilization for another 20 min. Then for each sample, 0.25 g PE-labeled anti-IL-4 antibodies and 0.25 g FITC-labeled anti-IFN- antibodies (BioLegend) were added and thrice washed as usual. Finally, 0.6 mL cell staining buffer was added to resuspend the cells, and a flow cytometry system (Beckman) was used to detect the interferon-gamma (IFN-) and interleukin (IL)-4 levels. The criteria for this study were set according to the blank measurement. The ratio of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in total cells was examined and the rates of T cells producing IFN- or IL-4 were reported.

2.8. Count of Worm and Liver Egg Burden

Forty-two days after challenge, all mice (10 in each group) were euthanized in the two independent trails, and worms were collected by perfusion from the hepatic portal system then counted.

To determine the liver egg burden, each mouse liver were weighed, homogenized, and digested for approximately 1 h at 56°C with 10 mL 10% NaOH. The suspensions were agitated, and 1-mL aliquots, collected from the middle of each tube, were transferred into 1.5-mL Eppendorf tubes and spun at a low speed to sediment the particles. Pellets were then resuspended in 200 L of PBS and the egg counts were determined under a microscopy.

Reductions in the parasite burden were calculated as follows: worm reduction rate (%) = ((average number of recovered worms of control group-average number of recovered worms of experimental group)/average number of recovered worms of control group) 100; and egg reduction rate (%) ((average number of eggs/g liver in control group-average number of eggs/g liver in experimental group)/average number of eggs/g liver of control group) 100.

2.9. Enzyme Activity Analysis by Thioredoxin Reductase Assay Kit

The enzyme activity analysis was referenced to Han [29]. Six-week-old worms were collected in trail 2 and stored at −80°C with Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline and protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma) at a ratio of 1 : 1000. Then, all of the worms (50 worms in each group) were grinded with Ready Prep Mini Grinders (BioRad) on ice and all the samples were cracked thoroughly by freezing and thawing three times. The thawed lysates were centrifuged at 10000 ×g for 20 min at 4°C and the supernatants containing thioredoxin glutathione reductase were used to detect the enzymatic activity in each individual group.

The enzyme activity was assessed using a Thioredoxin Reductase Assay Kit (Sigma) for an easy and simple colorimetric assay [33]. It is based on the reduction of 5,5′-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic) acid (DTNB) with NADPH to 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoic acid (TNB), which produces a strong yellow color that is measured at 412 nm. Components were added to a cuvette with a final volume of 1 mL, and 30 L of DTNB in DMSO (100 mM) was added immediately before detection with a Thermo NanoDrop ND-2000C (Thermo). The enzymatic kinetic program was set as follows using the spectrophotometer: delay = 120 sec, interval = 10 sec, and number of readings = 6. During the test, an inhibitor solution for specific inhibition of mammalian thioredoxin reductase contained in the kit was used, to determine the reduction of DTNB due only to thioredoxin reductase activity of SjTGR. All of the samples were detected in triplicate independently. And the data was calculated as the following computational formula: where, /min (thioredoxine reductase) = [/min (sample) − /min (sample + inhibitors)], dil = sample dilution factor, vol = volume of reaction in mL, and enzol = volume of enzyme in mL.

An in vitro test was carried out to evaluate the weakened effect of specific anti-SjTGR serum to thioredoxin reductase. Forty-two-day-old worms were carefully collected and soluble adult worm antigen preparations (SWAPs) were extracted using the above methods. Anti-SjTGR and normal mouse sera were added to SWAPs (1 mg/mL) at a ratio of 1 : 1, and both of the mixtures were incubated at room temperature for 2 h. The enzymatic activity of SjTGR was then detected with the methods described above.

2.10. Statistical Analysis by SPSS

All data were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student’s -test using SPSS v.12.0 software. values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Transient Expression of Recombinant Plasmid in 293T Cells

The SjTGR entire open reading frame amplified by PCR with special primers was subcloned into the plasmid pVAX1 with T4 DNA ligase and was confirmed correct by restriction enzyme digestion and sequencing. Then, the recombinant plasmids were transiently transfected into 293T cells.

Forty-eight hours after transfection of recombinant plasmid pVAX1/SjTGR, the cells were fixed to detect the expression of the protein of interest. Red fluorescence was observed on the cells transferred with pVAX1/SjTGR (Figure 2(a)), but not on those transferred with pVAX1 vector DNA alone (Figure 2(b)).

3.2. Evaluation of Protective Efficacy Induced by pVAX1/SjTGR

The total worm burden and eggs per gram (EPG) in each group, as well as the percent reduction in the worm burden and EPG in the vaccinated group compared with PBS control group are summarized in Table 1. In trail 1, animals administrated with particle bombardment induced better protective efficacy. Mice vaccinated with pVAX1/SjTGR by bombarding murine epidermis with the Helios gene gun system resulted in a significant worm burden reduction of 27.83% () and 38.83% () compared to the PBS control group in two independent trails, respectively. And no protection was observed in pVAX1/SjTGR/i.m. group as well as in two pVAX1 vaccinated groups. Mice in the vaccinated group by gene gun resulted in a significant liver egg burden reduction of 40.38% () and 44.51% () to the blank control group, in trail 1 and 2, respectively. Significant egg reduction also observed in pVAX1/SjTGR/i.m. group, but not in pVAX1 vaccinated groups.

GroupsWorm reductionEgg reduction
Worm burden  
(mean ± SE)
Percent reduction in worm burden (%)aLiver egg per gram (EPG) (mean ± SE)Percent reduction in liver egg count (%)b

Trail 1
 pVAX1/SjTGR/g.g. ( )c * 27.83 * 40.38
 pVAX1/g.g. ( ) −8.03 18.86
 pVAX1/SjTGR/i.m. ( ) −14.12 * 51.77
 pVAX1/i.m. ( ) −8.09 −8.86
 PBS ( )

Trail 2
 pVAX1/SjTGR/g.g. ( ) * 38.83 * 44.51
 pVAX1/g.g. ( ) −4.85 −9.79
 PBS ( )

Differences were significant at (*); data was presented in 95% confidence interval.
aPercent reduction was determined using total worms in immunized group compared to PBS group.
bPercent reduction was calculated using liver egg burden in immunized group compared to PBS group.
cThe number of animals in each group when perfusion.
3.3. Antibody Assay

Total IgG antibodies and its subtypes of IgG1 and IgG2a were detected by ELISA in trail 2, as described. SjTGR-specific IgG antibody was detected 10 days after immunization, significantly increased after boost vaccination, in the pVAX1/SjTGR immunized mice, and the specific antibody had no obvious change in mice that received pVAX1 vector DNA or PBS only (Figure 3(a)).

Both SjTGR-specific IgG1 (Figure 3(b)) and IgG2a antibodies (Figure 3(c)) increased significantly after the booster immunization with pVAX1/SjTGR, and the level of IgG1 was higher than IgG2a; the IgG1/IgG2a ratio was significantly increased after boost immunization (Figure 3(d)). No significant changes were noted in the two control groups in specific IgG1 and IgG2a antibody levels. We also found that different inoculation modes can induce different levels of antibodies, and the level of specific IgG antibody induced by recombinant plasmids pVAX1/SjTGR is significantly higher when delivered by gene gun than that by i.m. (Figure 4).

3.4. T Cell Subsets and Cytokine Determination

After the last immunization, the splenic lymphocytes of animals from each group in trail 2 were collected. Grinded cells were cultured, stimulated, stained by fluorescent-labeled antibodies, and detected with a flow cytometry system (FMC). In this paper, particle bombardment immunization pushs T cells forward to CD4+ T cells (Table 2). And the percent of cells producing IL-4 (Figure 5) or IFN- (Figure 6) in the pVAX1/SjTGR-vaccinated group were significantly increased compared to those in pVAX1 or PBS group.

GroupsT cell subsets Description (ratio)
CD4+ T cells (%)CD8+ T cells (%)

pVAX1/SjTGR20.497.402.77 : 1 : 1
20.847.492.78 : 1

pVAX114.237.301.95 : 1
16.197.542.15 : 1
14.787.262.04 : 1

PBS13.927.891.74 : 1
16.428.721.88 : 1

3.5. Activation Changes of Enzyme

SWAPs were extracted from worms in each individual group and enzymatic activity was detected. The detectable products of substrate were increased with incubation time. With same amount of SWAPs, the thioredoxin reductase (TR) enzymatic activity in the worms from pVAX1/SjTGR-immunized group expressed much lower enzymatic activity than that of the pVAX1 or PBS control groups (Figure 7).

Furthermore, SWAPs treated with anti-SjTGR antibodies expressed a lower TR enzymatic activity than untreated SWAPs, and the enzyme activity was not affected after incubating with normal mouse serum, indicating that anti-SjTGR antibodies influenced the thioredoxin reductase activity of SjTGR to catalyze DNTB into NTB, which can be measured at 412 nm (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

Thioredoxin glutathione reductase of Schistosome japonicum is a membrane protein of about 65 kDa, which is considered as a promising vaccine candidate antigen based on its immunogenicity [29] and its important role in parasite metabolism as a vital enzyme to balance redox equilibrium [34]. In the current study, we focused on evaluation of a recombinant plasmid pVAX1/SjTGR as a DNA vaccine based on SjTGR against schistosomiasis japonicum with two different modes. And pVAX1 was chosen as the vaccination regimen because it is mentioned by FDA before (

The main methods of delivery plasmid DNA into animals include intramuscular injection and intradermal delivery into skin by a gene gun system [35]. And the administration mode of delivering a DNA vaccine can influence the type of immune response [17] and somehow influence the result of immunoprotective efficacy. In this study, mice vaccinated with pVAX1/SjTGR by bombarding murine epidermis with the Helios gene gun system (BioRad) elicited a much stronger IgG antibody response specific for SjTGR by ELISA (Figure 3(a)), and achieved a prominent reduction of worm (27.83%, 38.83%, , Table 1) and liver EPG (40.38%, 44.51%, , Table 1), which was considered as a high-efficiency method for less cost (2.5 μg/mouse), compared with needle injection (20 g/mouse). Yoshida et al. compared the two methods in reproducible induction of specific immune responses and found that gene gun DNA delivery appeared to bring about highly reproducible and reliable results while the results obtained by intramuscular inoculation vary significantly [36]. They also thought that intramuscular injection appears to favor Th1 responses, while gene gun prefers to promote Th2 responses. And our results are like theirs to some extent.

The DNA vaccine transferred into cells by gene gun bombardment with golden particles under a special-high pressure (600 psi) will be assimilated by professional antigen-presenting cells or some other cells, which can induce humoral and cellular immunity [37]. DNA-coated golden particles delivery by gene gun predominantly produces IgG1 and induces Th2-type responses [17]. In our experiment, the dose of DNA plasmid that used in particle bombardment is 8-fold less than needle injection. But the former received much better protection. And it is considered that the CpG motif provided by the vector pVAX1 can influence the immune response, too [38].

In this paper, mice immunized pVAX1/SjTGR by particle delivery induced both anti-IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies increasing. The antibodies induced by SjTGR DNA constructs were dominantly IgG1 type which is proved to be efficient in complement fixation and with cytophilic property in antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity [39], and the result is the same with Da’dara et al. [40], who stated that gene gun immunization resulted in significantly higher levels of IgG1. And from the FMC results, we found that the ratio of CD4+ T cells/CD8+ T cells was promoted after boost immunization by gene gun, from the normal ratio (2 : 1) to about 2.7 : 1 (Table 2). The cell surface antigen CD4 is the receptor of major histocompatibility complex-II (MHCII), which is located on the surface of antigen presenting cells (APCs), such as dendritic cells (DCs). The activated CD4+ T cells work as three different subsets depending on their different functions. One of them is helper T cell (Th), which induced humoral and cellular immune responses by means of two kinds of Th cells. The Th1 cells mediate cytokine producing with the signal of IFN- level increasing, known as Th1 response, while the Th2 cells secrete IL-4 and other cytokines, named Th2 response [37, 41]. On the other hand, Th cells can activate B cells and regulate their differentiation and antibody producing. IL-4 can activate B lymphocytes to produce IgG1 subtype antibodies, which is beneficial to transform between antibody subtypes and enhances Th2-type immune responses [41, 42]. And mice immunized with the recombinant plasmid by gene gun elicited both Th1-type cytokine IFN- and Th2-type cytokine IL-4 secreting augment, suggesting that mice-inoculated pVAX1/SjTGR plasmid induced mixed Th1/Th2 immune responses. Sawant [43] suggested that IL-4 may be more appropriate as a genetic adjuvant than IFN- for ND (Newcastle) DNA vaccine. One strategy to improve DNA vaccine-induced immune responses is the utility of cytokine cDNA as a molecular adjuvant [44]. Coimmunization of these cytokine molecular cassettes is an effective method to modulate the direction of the immune responses (humoral or cellular immune response).

In addition, SWAPs were prepared to determine SjTGR thioredoxin reductase activity in vitro. SWAPs of worms from immunized animals expressed a much lower enzymatic activity in catalyzing DTNB into TNB (Figure  7) and SWAPs treated with specific anti-SjTGR serum displayed lower enzyme activity compared to untreated SWAP (Figure  8). This may be an important evidence to explain reduction of worms and eggs. We speculate that the complex of specific anti-SjTGR antibodies and the interest enzyme lead to the changes of spatial structure of SjTGR, which may be a good competitive inhibitor of interaction between the enzyme and substrate. Consequently, the development progress of worms may be blocked partially, which is responsible for the protective effect against schistosomiasis. On the other hand, the DNA vaccine inoculated by golden-particle bombardment induced much higher antibody level (Figure 4), which is probably beneficial to the protection.

In this study we investigated the protective ability of pVAX1/SjTGR as a DNA vaccine by inoculating with a gene gun system. We found that animals immunized with pVAX1/SjTGR induced both humoral and cellular immunity. And the enzymatic activity of SjTGR was weakened to some extent by high-titer antibodies. Based on our work, SjTGR may be considered as a prospective vaccine candidate antigen against schistosomiasis in a BALB/c mouse model.


The authors thank Yaojun Shi, Ke Lu, Jinming Liu, Chuangang Zhu, Hao Li, and Meifu Tang from the Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, for technical assistance with parasite collection. This study received financial support from Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (no. 200903036) and State-level public welfare scientific research courtyard basic scientific research operation cost (2010JB10).


  1. H. Zeng, X. Yang, S. Meng et al., “Awareness and knowledge of schistosomiasis infection and prevention in the, “Three Gorges Dam” reservoir area: a cross-sectional study on local residents and health personnel,” Acta Tropica, vol. 120, pp. 238–244, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. Fenwick and J. P. Webster, “Schistosomiasis: challenges for control, treatment and drug resistance,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 577–582, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Y. X. He, B. Salafsky, and K. Ramaswamy, “Host-parasite relationships of Schistosoma japonicum in mammalian hosts,” Trends in Parasitology, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 320–324, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. Zhou, Y. Li, and X. Yang, “Schistosomiasis control in China,” World Health Forum, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 387–389, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  5. D. M. Renquist, A. J. Johnson, J. C. Lewis, and D. J. Johnson, “A natural case of Schistosoma mansoni in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes versus),” Laboratory Animal Science, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 763–768, 1975. View at: Google Scholar
  6. C. V. Yason and M. N. Novilla, “Clinical and pathologic features of experimental Schistosoma japonicum infection in pigs,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 47–64, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. D. J. Gray, G. M. Williams, Y. Li, and D. P. McManus, “Transmission dynamics of Schistosoma japonicum in the lakes and marshlands of China,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 12, Article ID e4058, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Z. S. Wu, T. G. Wang, X. S. Zhang et al., “Snail control by using soil pasting mixed with niclosamide,” Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 569–573, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  9. M. Doenhoff, Q. Bickle, J. Bain, G. Webbe, and G. Nelson, “Factors affecting the acquisition of resistance against Schistosoma mansoni in the mouse. V. Reduction in the degree of resistance to reinfection after chemotherapeutic elimination of recently patent primary infections,” Journal of Helminthology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  10. E. S. Reda, A. Ouhtit, S. H. Abdeen, and E. A. El-Shabasy, “Structural changes of Schistosoma mansoni adult worms recovered from C57BL/6 mice treated with radiation-attenuated vaccine and/or praziquantel against infection,” Parasitology Research, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 979–992, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. P. McManus and J. P. Dalton, “Vaccines against the zoonotic trematodes Schistosoma japonicum, Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica,” Parasitology, vol. 133, supplement, pp. S43–S61, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. C. Oliveira, C. T. Fonseca, F. C. Cardoso, L. P. Farias, and L. C. C. Leite, “Recent advances in vaccine research against schistosomiasis in Brazil,” Acta Tropica, vol. 108, no. 2-3, pp. 256–262, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. P. Wang, X. C. Chen, and D. M. Gao, “Research progress on schistosome vaccine and prospect of its application in China,” Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 402–411, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  14. A. El Amir, “Effect of mouse strain on humoral responses to Schistosoma mansoni irradiated cercariae vaccine,” The Egyptian Journal of Immunology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 51–63, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  15. A. A. Da'Dara, P. J. Skelly, M. Wang, and D. A. Harn, “Immunization with plasmid DNA encoding the integral membrane protein, Sm23, elicits a protective immune response against schistosome infection in mice,” Vaccine, vol. 20, no. 3-4, pp. 359–369, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Y. Zhu, J. Ren, A. Da'dara et al., “The protective effect of a Schistosoma japonicum Chinese strain 23 kDa plasmid DNA vaccine in pigs is enhanced with IL-12,” Vaccine, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 78–83, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. R. Weiss, S. Scheiblhofer, J. Freund, F. Ferreira, I. Livey, and J. Thalhamer, “Gene gun bombardment with gold particles displays a particular Th2-promoting signal that over-rules the Th1-inducing effect of immunostimulatory CpG motifs in DNA vaccines,” Vaccine, vol. 20, no. 25-26, pp. 3148–3154, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. K. Jones, “Structure and diversity of cestode epithelia,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 913–923, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. K. Jones, G. N. Gobert, L. Zhang, P. Sunderland, and D. P. McManus, “The cytoskeleton and motor proteins of human schistosomes and their roles in surface maintenance and host-parasite interactions,” BioEssays, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 752–765, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. Loukas, M. Tran, and M. S. Pearson, “Schistosome membrane proteins as vaccines,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 37, no. 3-4, pp. 257–263, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. H. Tran, M. S. Pearson, J. M. Bethony et al., “Tetraspanins on the surface of Schistosoma mansoni are protective antigens against schistosomiasis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 835–840, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. J. Van Hellemond, K. Retra, J. F. H. M. Brouwers et al., “Functions of the tegument of schistosomes: clues from the proteome and lipidome,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 691–699, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Zhang, Y. Han, Z. Zhu et al., “Cloning, expression, and characterization of Schistosoma japonicum tegument protein phosphodiesterase-5,” Parasitology Research, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 775–786, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. P. Zhang, W. N. Zhang, C. P. Ren, M. Liu, and J. J. Shen, “Construction of DNA vaccine pcDNA3.1(+)/tetraspanin 2-A against Schistosoma japonicum and its immune-protective effect in mice,” Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 534–536, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  25. S. Liu, J. Cheng, C. Tang et al., “Construction and expression of DNA vaccine pIRES-Sj97-Sj14-Sj26 and its immunogenicity in mice,” Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 625–629, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Kasny, L. Mikes, K. Doleckova et al., “Cathepsins B1 and B2 of Trichobilharzia SPP., bird schistosomes causing cercarial dermatitis,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 712, pp. 136–154, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  27. X. H. Li, J. P. Cao, L. H. Tang et al., “Protective efficacy induced by dendritic cells pulsed with GST in combination with CpG oligodeoxynucleotide against Schistosoma japonicum infection,” Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 185–189, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  28. Y. Zhu, F. Lu, Y. Dai et al., “Synergistic enhancement of immunogenicity and protection in mice against Schistosoma japonicum with codon optimization and electroporation delivery of SjTPI DNA vaccines,” Vaccine, vol. 28, no. 32, pp. 5347–5355, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Y. Han, “Characterization of thioredoxin glutathione reductase in Schiotosoma japonicum,” Parasitology International, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 475–480, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  30. L. Song, J. Li, S. Xie et al., “Thioredoxin glutathione reductase as a novel drug target: evidence from Schistosoma japonicum,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, Article ID e31456, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  31. M. O. Diniz and L. C. S. Ferreira, “Enhanced anti-tumor effect of a gene gun-delivered DNA vaccine encoding the human papillomavirus type 16 oncoproteins genetically fused to the herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 421–427, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. G. Ahmad, W. Zhang, W. Torben et al., “Protective and antifecundity effects of Sm-p80-based DNA vaccine formulation against Schistosoma mansoni in a nonhuman primate model,” Vaccine, vol. 27, no. 21, pp. 2830–2837, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. N. Kuntz, E. Davioud-Charvet, A. A. Sayed et al., “Thioredoxin glutathione reductase from Schistosoma mansoni: an essential parasite enzyme and a key drug target,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 4, no. 6, article 206, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. W. A. Lea, A. Jadhav, G. Rai et al., “A 1,536-well-based kinetic HTS assay for inhibitors of Schistosoma mansoni thioredoxin glutathione reductase,” Assay and Drug Development Technologies, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 551–555, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. P. Šíma, M. Šmahel, F. Jelínek, and V. Vonka, “DNA vaccine against friend erythroleukaemia virus,” Folia Biologica, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 43–50, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  36. A. Yoshida, T. Nagata, M. Uchijima, T. Higashi, and Y. Koide, “Advantage of gene gun-mediated over intramuscular inoculation of plasmid DNA vaccine in reproducible induction of specific immune responses,” Vaccine, vol. 18, no. 17, pp. 1725–1729, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. Gurunathan, C. Y. Wu, B. L. Freidag, and R. A. Seder, “DNA vaccines: a key for inducing long-term cellular immunity,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 442–447, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. R. Aldridge, E. C. Johnson, and R. E. Kuhn, “CpG stimulates protective immunity in Balb/cJ mice infected with larval Taenia crassiceps,” Journal of Parasitology, vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 920–928, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. Stewart, G. Thom, M. Levens et al., “A variant human IgG1-Fc mediates improved ADCC,” Protein Engineering, Design & Selection, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 671–678, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  40. A. A. Da'dara, P. J. Skelly, M. Fatakdawala, S. Visovatti, E. Eriksson, and D. A. Harn, “Comparative efficacy of the Schistosoma mansoni nucleic acid vaccine, Sm23, following microseeding or gene gun delivery,” Parasite Immunology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 179–187, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. J. Kim, J. S. Yang, L. Montaner, D. J. Lee, A. A. Chalian, and D. B. Weiner, “Coimmunization with IFN-γ or IL-2, but not IL-13 or IL-4 cDNA can enhance Th1-type DNA vaccine-induced immune responses in vivo,” Journal of Interferon and Cytokine Research, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 311–319, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. T. Tanaka, J. Hu-Li, R. A. Seder, B. F. D. S. Groth, and W. E. Paul, “Interleukin 4 suppresses interleukin 2 and interferon γ production by naive T cells stimulated by accessory cell-dependent receptor engagement,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 13, pp. 5914–5918, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  43. P. M. Sawant, P. C. Verma, P. K. Subudhi et al., “Immunomodulation of bivalent Newcastle disease DNA vaccine induced immune response by co-delivery of chicken IFN-γ and IL-4 genes,” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 144, pp. 36–44, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. K. J. Ishii, W. R. Weiss, M. Ichino, D. Verthelyi, and D. M. Klinman, “Activity and safety of DNA plasmids encoding IL-4 and IFN gamma,” Gene Therapy, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 237–244, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Yan Cao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles