Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 135013, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/135013
Clinical Study

CT Perfusion in the Characterisation of Renal Lesions: An Added Value to Multiphasic CT

1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Viale Bracci 10, 53100 Siena, Italy
2Department of Medical, Surgical and Neuro Sciences, Diagnostic Imaging, University of Siena, Viale Bracci 10, 53100 Siena, Italy
3Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Via Aldo Moro 2, 53100 Siena, Italy
4Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Section of Pathology, University of Siena, Viale Bracci 10, 53100 Siena, Italy
5Department of Medical, Surgical and Neuro Sciences, Section of Pathology, University of Siena, Viale Bracci 10, 53100 Siena, Italy

Received 25 April 2014; Accepted 16 June 2014; Published 13 August 2014

Academic Editor: Lorenzo Preda

Copyright © 2014 Francesco Giuseppe Mazzei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Siegel, D. Naishadham, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2013,” CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 11–30, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Kovacs, M. Akhtar, B. J. Beckwith et al., “The Heidelberg classification of renal cell tumours,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 183, no. 2, pp. 131–133, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. Kuroda and A. Tanaka, “Recent classification of renal epithelial tumors,” Medical Molecular Morphology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 68–75, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Jemal, F. Bray, M. M. Center, J. Ferlay, E. Ward, and D. Forman, “Global cancer statistics,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 69–90, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. I. S. Gill, M. Aron, D. A. Gervais, and M. A. Jewett, “Clinical practice: small renal mass,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, pp. 624–634, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  6. C. B. Dechet, H. Zincke, T. J. Sebo et al., “Prospective analysis of computerized tomography and needle biopsy with permanent sectioning to determine the nature of solid renal masses in adults,” Journal of Urology, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 71–74, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Choudhary, A. Rajesh, N. J. Mayer, K. A. Mulcahy, and A. Haroon, “Renal oncocytoma: CT features cannot reliably distinguish oncocytoma from other renal neoplasms,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 517–522, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. E. Maturen, H. V. Nghiem, E. M. Caoili, E. G. Higgins, J. S. Wolf Jr., and D. P. Wood Jr., “Renal mass core biopsy: accuracy and impact on clinical management,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 188, no. 2, pp. 563–570, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. V. A. Sahni and S. G. Silverman, “Biopsy of renal masses: when and why,” Cancer Imaging, vol. 9, pp. 44–55, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Chen, Q. Liu, Q. Hao et al., “Study of 320-slice dynamic volume CT perfusion in different pathologic types of kidney tumor: preliminary results,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 1, Article ID e85522, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. M. A. Mazzei, N. C. Squitieri, E. Sani et al., “Differences in perfusion CT parameter values with commercial software upgrades: a preliminary report about algorithm consistency and stability,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 54, pp. 805–811, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Scialpi, A. di Maggio, M. Midiri, A. Loperfido, G. Angelelli, and A. Rotondo, “Small renal masses: assessment of lesion characterization and vascularity on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with fat suppression,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 175, no. 3, pp. 751–757, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. Weidner, J. P. Semple, W. R. Welch, and J. Folkman, “Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis—correlation in invasive breast carcinoma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 324, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. Weidner, J. Folkman, F. Pozza et al., “Tumor angiogenesis: a new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 84, no. 24, pp. 1875–1887, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. R. Prasad, P. A. Humphrey, J. R. Catena et al., “Common and uncommon histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma: imaging spectrum with pathologic correlation,” Radiographics, vol. 26, pp. 1795–1806, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  16. J. Zhang, R. A. Lefkowitz, N. M. Ishill et al., “Solid renal cortical tumors: differentiation with CT,” Radiology, vol. 244, no. 2, pp. 494–504, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. R. Young, D. Margolis, S. Sauk, A. J. Pantuck, J. Sayre, and S. S. Raman, “Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: discrimination from other renal cell carcinoma subtypes and oncocytoma at multiphasic multidetector CT,” Radiology, vol. 267, no. 2, pp. 444–453, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. P. M. Pierorazio, E. S. Hyams, S. Tsai et al., “Multiphasic enhancement patterns of small renal masses (≤4 cm) on preoperative computed tomography: Utility for distinguishing subtypes of renal cell carcinoma, angiomyolipoma, and oncocytoma,” Urology, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 1265–1271, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. Gakis, U. Kramer, D. Schilling, S. Kruck, A. Stenzl, and H. Schlemmer, “Small renal Oncocytomas: differentiation with multiphase CT,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 274–278, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. V. G. Bird, P. Kanagarajah, G. Morillo et al., “Differentiation of oncocytoma and renal cell carcinoma in small renal masses (< 4 cm): The role of 4-phase computerized tomography,” World Journal of Urology, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 787–792, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F. G. Mazzei, L. Volterrani, S. Guerrini et al., “Reduced time CT perfusion acquisitions are sufficient to measure the permeability surface area product with a deconvolution method,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 573268, 6 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. C. S. Reiner, R. Goetti, D. Eberli et al., “CT perfusion of renal cell carcinoma: Impact of volume coverage on quantitative analysis,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Y. Chen, J. Zhang, J. Dai, X. Feng, H. Lu, and C. Zhou, “Angiogenesis of renal cell carcinoma: perfusion CT findings,” Abdominal Imaging, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 622–628, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. S. Reiner, M. Roessle, T. Thiesler et al., “Computed tomography perfusion imaging of renal cell carcinoma: systematic comparison with histopathological angiogenic and prognostic markers,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 183–191, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. E. C. Hwang, H. S. Yu, and D. D. Kwon, “Small renal masses: surgery or surveillance,” Korean Journal of Urology, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 283–288, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  26. R. Vikram, C. S. Ng, P. Tamboli et al., “Papillary renal cell carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation and spectrum of disease,” Radiographics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 741–754, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. Volterrani, M. A. Mazzei, M. Fedi, and M. Scialpi, “Computed tomography perfusion using first pass methods for lung nodule characterization: limits and implications in radiologic practice,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 44, no. 2, p. 124, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus