Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 194076, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/194076
Clinical Study

Acetabular Reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider Antiprotrusio Cage and Bulk Allografts: Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up Results

Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Integrated University Hospital, Piazzale A Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy

Received 14 February 2014; Accepted 23 April 2014; Published 21 May 2014

Academic Editor: Akihiro Sudo

Copyright © 2014 Dario Regis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. P. Jones and P. F. Lachiewicz, “Factors influencing the longer-term survival of uncemented acetabular components used in total hip revisions,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery A, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 342–347, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. H. Weeden and W. G. Paprosky, “Porous-ingrowth revision acetabular implants secured with peripheral screws: a minimum twelve-year follow-up,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery A, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 1266–1271, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. H. Pollock and L. A. Whiteside, “The fate of massive allografts in total hip acetabular revision surgery,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 271–276, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. P. Hooten Jr., C. A. Engh Jr., and C. A. Engh, “Failure of structural acetabular allografts in cementless revision hip arthroplasty,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery B, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 419–422, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Garbuz, E. Morsi, and A. E. Gross, “Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft: study with a minimum five-year follow-up,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery A, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 693–697, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. A. Shinar and W. H. Harris, “Bulk structural autogenous grafts and allografts for reconstruction of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty: sixteen-year-average follow-up,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery A, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 159–168, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Schelfaut, S. Cool, and M. Mulier, “The use of structural periacetabular allografts in acetabular revision surgery: 2.5–5 years follow-up,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 455–461, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Garbuz, E. Morsi, N. Mohamed, and A. E. Gross, “Classification and reconstruction in revision acetabular arthroplasty with bone stock deficiency,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 323, pp. 98–107, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Schatzker and M. K. Wong, “Acetabular revision: the role of rings and cages,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 369, pp. 187–197, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. L. Nelson, “Management of severe acetabular bone loss during revision total hip arthroplasty: role of acetabular reconstruction cages,” Seminars in Arthroplasty, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 60–69, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. J. Berry, “Antiprotrusio cages for acetabular revision,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 420, pp. 106–112, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. E. Gross and S. Goodman, “The current role of structural grafts and cages in revision arthroplasty of the hip,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 429, pp. 193–200, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. R. O'Rourke, W. G. Paprosky, and A. G. Rosenberg, “Use of structural allografts in acetabular revision surgery,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 420, pp. 113–121, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. J. Gill, J. B. Sledge, and M. E. Müller, “The management of severe acetabular bone loss using structural allograft and acetabular reinforcement devices,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. J. Saleh, G. Jaroszynski, I. Woodgate, L. Saleh, and A. E. Gross, “Revision total hip arthroplasty with the use of structural acetabular allograft and reconstruction ring: a case series with a 10-year average follow-up,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 951–958, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. W. Wachtl, M. Jung, R. P. Jakob, and E. Gautier, “The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery: a mean follow-up of 12 years,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 959–963, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. van der Linde and A. Tonino, “Acetabular revision with impacted grafting and a reinforcement ring: 42 Patients followed for a mean of 10 years,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 221–227, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Winter, M. Piert, R. Volkmann et al., “Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery A, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 862–867, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Gallo, Z. Rozkydal, and M. Sklenský, “Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects using Burch-Schneider cage,” Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 157–163, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. A. Carroll, D. A. Hoad-Reddick, R. M. Kerry, and I. Stockley, “The survival of support rings in complex acetabular revision surgery,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery B, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 574–578, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. Regis, B. Magnan, A. Sandri, and P. Bartolozzi, “Long-term results of anti-protrusio cage and massive allografts for the management of periprosthetic acetabular bone loss,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 826–832, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. P. Symeonides, G. E. Petsatodes, J. D. Pournaras, G. A. Kapetanos, A. G. Christodoulou, and D. J. Marougiannis, “The effectiveness of the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular bone deficiency. Five to twenty-one years' follow-up,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 168–174, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Cuscujuela-Maña, F. Angles, C. Tramunt, and X. Casanova, “Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular revision: a 5- to 13-year follow-up study,” Hip International, vol. 20, supplement 7, pp. 112–118, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. L. Jones, G. Grammatopoulos, and G. Singer, “The Burch-Schneider cage: 9-year survival in Paprosky type 3 acetabular defects. Clinical and radiological follow-up,” Hip International, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 28–34, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  25. W. G. Paprosky, P. G. Perona, and J. M. Lawrence, “Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: a 6-year follow-up evaluation,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 33–44, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. Bartolozzi and D. Regis, “Preoperative angiography of the iliofemoral vessels in hip revision surgery of massive acetabular bone defects,” Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 47–50, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. W. H. Harris, “Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery A, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 737–755, 1969. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. T. J. Gill, J. B. Sledge, and M. E. Müller, “The Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty. Indications, principles and long-term results,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery B, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 946–953, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. E. Gross, “Revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum with restoration of bone stock,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 369, pp. 198–207, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. F. Brooker, J. W. Bowerman, R. A. Robinson, and L. H. Riley Jr., “Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery A, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1629–1632, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Le, Applied Survival Analysis, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
  32. K. Trieb, “Unterschiedliche pfannenrevisions-implantate im ververgleich,” Der Orthopäde, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 704–710, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. J. Rosson and J. Schatzker, “The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabula,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery B, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 716–720, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. R. P. Pitto, G. V. di Muria, and D. Hohmann, “Impaction grafting and acetabular reinforcement in revision hip replacement,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 161–164, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Starker, F. Kandziora, A. Jäger, and F. Kershbaumer, “Pfannenrekonstruktion mit pfannenstützschalen,” Der Orthopäde, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 366–374, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  36. P. Böhm and S. Banzhaf, “Acetabular revision with allograft bone. 103 revisions with 3 reconstruction alternatives, followed for 0.3–13 years,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 240–249, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. F. Bonnomet, P. Clavert, P. Gicquel, Y. Lefèbvre, and J. F. Kempf, “Reconstruction par greffe et anneau de soutien des descellements acétabularies avec perte de substance osseuse severe. Analyse actuarielle sur 10 ans,” Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Réparatrice de l'Appareil Moteur, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 135–146, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  38. D. Regis, E. Dorigo, M. Modena, F. Corallo, and P. Bartolozzi, “Acetabular reinforcement rings and bone allografts in the reconstructive treatment of periprosthetic bone loss,” La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 217–224, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. P. J. Boscainos, C. F. Kellett, A. C. Maury, D. Backstein, and A. E. Gross, “Management of periacetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 465, pp. 159–165, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. U. J. Schlegel, R. G. Bitsch, M. Pritsch, P. R. Aldinger, H. Mau, and S. J. Breush, “Abstützschalen in der revisionsendoprothetik der hüfte. Mittelfristige ergebnisse von 298 implantaten,” Der Orthopäde, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 906–913, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  41. J. N. Sembrano and E. Y. Cheng, “Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 466, no. 7, pp. 1657–1665, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. D. J. Berry and M. E. Müller, “Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery B, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 711–715, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. P. Symeonides, G. Petsatodes, J. Pournaras, G. Kapetanos, A. Christodoulou, and P. Papadopoulos, “Replacement of deficient acetabulum using Burch-Schneider cages. 22 patients followed for 2–10 years,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 68, supplement 275, pp. 30–32, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. C. Perka and R. Ludwig, “Reconstruction of segmental defects during revision procedures of the acetabulum with the Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 568–574, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. Blacha and J. Gagala, “The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in revision hip arthroplasty with acetabular bone defect,” Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 631–637, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  46. F. S. Haddad, N. Shergill, and S. K. Muirhead-Allwood, “Acetabular reconstruction with morcellized allograft and ring support: a medium-term review,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 788–795, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. P. Udomkiat, L. D. Dorr, Y.-Y. Won, D. Longjohn, and Z. Wan, “Technical factors for success with metal ring acetabular reconstruction,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 961–969, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. A. J. van Koeveringe and P. E. Ochsner, “Revision cup arthroplasty using Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 291–295, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. H. Pieringer, V. Auersperg, and N. Böhler, “Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone-deficiency. The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 489–496, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. C. L. Peters, M. Curtain, and K. M. Samuelson, “Acetabular revision with the Burch-Schnieder antiprotrusio cage and cancellous allograft bone,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 307–312, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. T. Ilchmann, J. P. Gelzer, E. Winter, and K. Weise, “Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider ring: an EBRA analysis of 40 cup revisions,” Acta Orthopaedica, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 79–86, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. S. Goodman, H. Saastamoinen, N. Shasha, and A. Gross, “Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 436–446, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. W. G. Paprosky, S. S. Sporer, and B. P. Murphy, “Addressing severe bone deficiency. What a cage will not do,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 22, no. 4, supplement 1, pp. 111–115, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. D. Regis, A. Sandri, I. Bonetti, O. Bortolami, and P. Bartolozzi, “A minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1057–1063, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. R. P. Pitto, “Primary stability of acetabular reinforcement implants in revision surgery,” La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 211–219, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. K. Kawanabe, H. Akiyama, K. Goto, S. Maeno, and T. Nakamura, “Load dispersion effects of acetabular reinforcement devices used in revision total hip arthroplasty. A simulation study using finite element analysis,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1061–1066, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. C. J. Lavernia, C. C. Cook, R. A. Hernandez, R. J. Sierra, and M. D. Rossi, “Neurovascular injuries in acetabular reconstruction cage surgery. An anatomical study,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 124–132, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. M. P. Bostrom, A. P. Lehman, R. L. Buly, S. Lyman, and B. J. Nestor, “Acetabular revision with the contour antiprotrusio cage: 2- to 5-year follow-up,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 453, pp. 188–194, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M. J. Christie, S. A. Barrington, M. F. Brinson, M. E. Ruhling, and D. K. DeBoer, “Bridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2- to 9-year results,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 393, pp. 216–227, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. C. L. Peters, M. Miller, J. Erickson, P. Hall, and K. Samuelson, “Acetabular revision with a modular anti-protrusio acetabular component,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 19, no. 7, supplement 2, pp. 67–72, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. E. Hansen, D. Shearer, and M. D. Ries, “Does a cemented cage improve revision THA for severe acetabular defects?” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 469, no. 2, pp. 494–502, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. J. Gallo and A. V. Florschutz, “Burch-Schneider cage fracture: a case report,” Biomedical Papers of the Medical Faculty of Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 281–284, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. D. Regis, A. Sandri, A. Rizzo, and P. Bartolozzi, “Late fracture of a Burch-Schneider acetabular cage: rare occurrence following polyethylene cup wear,” BMJ Case Report, vol. 2009, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. F. Mittag and T. Kluba, “Aneurysm of the femoral artery caused by aseptic loosening and migration of a Burch-Schneider cage,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 159.e9–159.e12, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. J.-B. Zhang, B.-C. Chen, F. Wang, R. Sun, and B.-H. Zhao, “The anatomical study of safe zones of the screw fixations in acetabular revision surgery,” Zhongua Wai Ke Za Zhi, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 693–696, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. L. Gauthier, D. Allen, and P. Kim, “Late transection of the sciatic nerve in association with an acetabular reconstruction cage,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 333.e21–333.e24, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. W. M. Hussain, H. M. Hussain, M. S. Hussain, and D. W. Manning, “A late vascular complication due to component migration after revision total hip arthroplasty,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 976.e7–976.e10, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. G. K. Deirmengian, B. Zmistowski, J. T. O'Neil, and W. J. Hozack, “Management of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery A, vol. 93, no. 19, pp. 1842–1852, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. N. A. Beckmann, S. Weiss, M. C. Klotz, M. Gondan, S. Jaeger, and R. G. Bitsch, “Loosening after acetabular revision: comparison of trabecular metal and reinforcement rings. A systematic review,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 229–235, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar