BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 202398 | 10 pages |

Negative Effects of a Nonhost Proteinase Inhibitor of ~19.8 kDa from Madhuca indica Seeds on Developmental Physiology of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)

Academic Editor: Sudhir Sopory
Received09 Feb 2014
Revised06 Jul 2014
Accepted10 Jul 2014
Published14 Sep 2014


An affinity purified trypsin inhibitor from the seed flour extracts of Madhuca indica (MiTI) on denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis showed that MiTI consisted of a single polypeptide chain with molecular mass of ~19.8 kDa. MiTI inhibited the total proteolytic and trypsin-like activities of the midgut proteinases of Helicoverpa armigera larvae by 87.51% and 76.12%, respectively, at concentration of 5 µg/mL with an IC50 of 1.75 µg/mL against trypsin like midgut proteinases. The enzyme kinetic studies demonstrated that MiTI is a competitive inhibitor with a value of −10 M for Helicoverpa trypsin like midgut proteinases. In vivo experiments with different concentrations of MiTI in artificial diet (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5% w/w) showed an effective downfall in the larval body weight and an increase in larval mortality. The concentration of MiTI in the artificial diet to cause 50% mortality (LD50) of larvae was 1.5% w/w and that to cause reduction in mass of larvae by 50% (ED50) was 1.0% w/w. Nutritional indices observations suggest the toxic and adverse effects of MiTI on the growth and development of H. armigera larvae. The results suggest a strong bioinsecticidal potential of affinity purified MiTI which can be exploited in insect pest management of crop plants.

1. Introduction

Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) commonly known as cotton bollworm or American bollworm is a major pest of many important crop plants (>180 plant hosts from >45 families) causing heavy crop losses every year to agricultural, horticultural, and ornamental crops [1]. It is a major polyphagous and cosmopolitan pest, widespread in central and southern Europe, temperate Asia, Africa, Australia, and Oceania, and has also recently been established successfully in Brazil [2]. Larvae of H. armigera are foliar feeders as early instars and later shift to the seeds and fruits, causing a drastic reduction in yield estimated to be greater than US$2 billion annually.

H. armigera frequently develops rapid resistance to insecticides as compared to some other polyphagous pests [3]. Both the host plant and herbivore struggle hard to overcome the defense of each other, and to survive ensuring a parallel coevolution among them [4, 5]. The digestive enzymes especially the proteolytic enzymes play important roles in insect growth, development, and reproduction processes [6] and therefore these enzymes demand attention as a target for insect pest management [7, 8].

Plants have evolved protease inhibitors (PIs) as one of the natural defensive strategies against insect pests. Although, natural PIs are distributed in all living organisms but they are commonly expressed in plants organs [9]. PIs are small regulatory proteins normally present at 5–15% of total protein concentration and the inhibitory activity of PIs is mostly carried out by different molecular interactions involved in stabilization of reactive site structure [10]. Serine proteinases are the main enzymes present in the midgut of lepidopterans [11] and they are responsible for about 95% of total proteinase activities [12]. Serine proteinase inhibitors have gained importance due to their ubiquitous distribution in the plant kingdom [7]. PIs have been extensively studied for development of resistance against insect pest. PIs also manifest as antinutritional agents, especially in insects where they inhibit midgut proteinases [7, 13, 14].

Madhuca indica (Mahua) belongs to the family Sapotaceae; an Indian tropical tree distributed in the central and north Indian plains and forests. The tree, its seeds and flowers have been very useful in Indian economy for a long time. The seeds are used for treatment of enlarged axillary gland, neurotic disorder, aphrodisiac in cough, and bronchitis, relief of pain in the muscle and joints to improve the texture, and curing of bleeding gums and ulcers. The present work describes the purification of a bioinsecticidal trypsin inhibitor from Madhuca indica seeds and its effect on developmental physiology of the polyphagous insect H. armigera through a series of in vitro and in vivo experiments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Seed Material and Insect Rearing

Madhuca indica mature and pale-yellow ripe seeds were collected from the trees available locally. H. armigera larvae for in vitro and in vivo studies were from a laboratory colony which was obtained from Narendra-Dev University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad, India. Insects were housed at 28 ± 2°C, 60% relative humidity with a photoperiod of 14 h light and 10 h dark. The composition of the artificial diet was similar to that followed by Singh et al. [13].

2.2. Chemicals

N-α-Benzoyl-DL-arginine-p-nitroanilide (BApNA), soybean trypsin inhibitor (SBTI), Bovine serum albumin (BSA), acrylamide, bis-acrylamide, and other electrophoretic reagents were procured from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo, USA). Sephadex G-75 was purchased from Amersham Biosciences (Uppsala, Sweden). Trypsin-Sepharose CL-4B, low molecular weight markers and azocasein were purchased from Sisco Research Limited (Mumbai, India). All other chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade.

2.3. Isolation and Purification of Trypsin Inhibitor from Madhuca indica Seeds

Madhuca indica trypsin inhibitor (MiTI) was purified as described earlier by our working group [13]. Dried seeds were ground to fine powder, depigmented, and defatted with several washes of chilled acetone and hexane. The clear supernatant was collected at 12,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C and three cuts of (NH4)2SO4 precipitations were done, 0–30% (), 30–65% (), and 65–95 (). The protein pellets of different fractions were dialyzed against 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.6) using a membrane with a cut off range 12 kDa (Sigma grade) and lyophilized. Of the three pooled fractions, (30–65%) showing the maximum trypsin inhibition activity was preferred for gel-filtration chromatography on Sephadex G-75 column (100 × 2 cm) equilibrated with equilibration buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.6). The fractions exhibiting highest trypsin inhibition activity were pooled, dialyzed, and lyophilized. The active fractions eluted from gel-filtration column were applied onto a Trypsin-Sepharose CL-4B column (25 × 1.5 cm) preequilibrated with 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.6), 5 mM CaCl2, and 0.1 M NaCl. The bound proteins were retrieved at an initial flow rate of 30 mL/h using 100 mM HCl solution. The fractions of antitryptic peak were pooled and lyophilized for further analysis. Proteinase inhibitory activity [15] and protein content [16] in the aliquot were determined.

2.4. Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis

Sodium dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was carried out at 12% as described by Laemmli [17] at room temperature in the absence and presence of β-mercaptoethanol (0.1 M). In the wells, 30 μL (50 μg) of affinity purified sample and 20 μL (as such) of marker (using low molecular weight standard protein markers) was loaded. Molecular weight of unknown protein was calculated from the Genei gel-doc fire-reader software.

2.5. Extraction of Midgut Proteinases from Larvae of H. armigera

To assess the potency of MiTI on proteinases of H. armigera,actively feeding fourth instar larvae of H. armigera were cold immobilized and killed by decapitation to collect the midguts along with its content [13]. Replicated sets of five guts were maintained and each gut was transferred into chilled polycarbonate tube and homogenized in 0.1 M glycine-NaOH buffer (pH 10.0) followed by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. It was ensured that the inhibitory assay was performed in a buffer capable of neutralizing the acid. Supernatant used as the crude enzymes extract and was stored at −20°C until utilized in inhibition assays.

2.6. In Vitro Proteinase and Proteinase Inhibitory Assay

Total gut proteinase activity was measured by azo-caseinolytic assay [18]. Trypsin-like activities were estimated using the chromogenic substrate BApNA [15]. BApNA is specific for the determination of trypsin activity [19]. For the inhibitory assays, different concentrations of affinity purified inhibitor and soybean trypsin inhibitor (SBTI) were added to the HGP extract (40 μL) and incubated at room temperature (27°C) for 15 min. The residual proteinase activity was determined spectrophotometrically at 410 nm. Inhibitor activity was calculated by the amount of purified sample required to inhibit 50% of trypsin activity, which is considered as one unit of trypsin inhibition and expressed as trypsin inhibitor units per mg seed protein. Results were expressed as % inhibition relative to controls without inhibitor. Increasing concentrations of MiTI were incubated with 40 μL HGP, and enzyme assay was performed. Percentage of inhibition for each inhibitor concentration was used to create a titration curve. IC50 value was determined by the help of titration curve. All in vitro assays were carried out in triplicates.

2.7. Effect of pH and Temperature on Stability of MiTI against HGP

Thermostability of purified inhibitor was determined at different temperatures (10–100°C). In this assay 5 μg/mL of MiTI was mixed with 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.6) and incubated at various temperatures for 30 min. The stability of inhibitor was also determined at different pHs (2–12) [13]. After incubation at various temperatures and pH, samples were centrifuged and remaining proteinase inhibitor activity was measured against trypsin like midgut proteinases. BApNA was used as a substrate for inhibition activities.

2.8. Determination of Kinetic Parameters

In order to determine the inhibition constant (), data was plotted according to Dixon [20]. The inhibition constant was determined for trypsin like midgut proteinases, by preincubating the enzyme with concentrations of MiTI (3, 5, 7, and 10 nM). Two BApNA concentrations (0.005 and 0.01 mM) were used. The velocity of enzymatic reaction was expressed as 1/v (OD410 mM/min/mL)−1 and value was determined by intersection of the two lines for each substrate concentration. To determine the inhibition mechanism of MiTI against trypsin like midgut proteinases, the inhibition kinetic data were analyzed by Lineweaver-Burk double-reciprocal plots.

2.9. In Vivo Activity of MiTI against H. armigera

For in vivo studies, MiTI was incorporated into the artificial diet at different concentrations (0.5, 1.0 and 1.5% w/w) as suggested by Giri and Kachole [21], while diet without MiTI was used as control. Larval weight was taken on an interval of two days until pupation. 45 larvae were used for each treatment. All the experiments were performed at 28 ± 2°C and 60% relative humidity and the food was changed at every alternate day to minimize the microbial contamination. The effect of MiTI was evaluated at the larval stage on different parameters like weight, growth, mortality and duration of the larval stages. At the pupal stage, we recorded the pupal development duration and malformed pupae; while for the adult stage, the percentage of deformations and fecundity was recorded in every parallel time interval.

Relative growth rate was calculated by using formulae of Farrar et al. [22]. Relative growth rate = [change in body weight/(initial dry weight of larvae × feeding period duration)]. The relative growth rate of larvae in each treatment was calculated for every two days interval. Mean fecundity was determined by the method reported by Singh et al. [13]. Fecundity (%) = [egg numbers of MiTI treated/egg numbers of control] × 100.

2.10. Calculation of LD50 and ED50 Values of MiTI against H. Armigera Larvae

Different dosages of MiTI were used to determine LD50 (effective dose to kill 50% H. armigera larvae) and ED50 (effective dose to cause a 50% reduction in larval weight) dosages.

Each treatment had 45 larvae per replication, and there were three replications in a completely randomized design. Observations were recorded on larval mortality and weight of the surviving larvae after three days of maintaining on the artificial diet treated with various dosages of the MiTI. One set of larvae maintained on untreated artificial diet represented control. The mortality and weights of H. armigera larvae maintained on control diet were considered as the basis on which the LD50 and ED50 values were calculated for the larvae maintained with MiTI incorporated diets. The LD50 and ED50 values were calculated using the log dose-probit analysis [23].

3. Nutritional Parameters

Nutritional indices were measured on dry weight basis. After measuring the weight of the fourth and fifth instar larvae, they were exposed to either the MiTI-supplemented diet or the control diet, and the weights of the larvae were recorded at every alternate day until they reached the prepupal stage. The initial fresh diet as well as the diet and feces remaining at the end of each experiment were weighted. The quantity of food ingested was determined by subtracting the diet remaining at the end of each experiment from the total weight of diet provided.

The following formulae were used as reported elsewhere [22] to calculate CI (consumption index), AD (approximate digestibility), ECI (efficiency of conversion of ingested food), and ECD (efficiency of conversion of digested food): ECI = () × 100; ECD= [)] × 100; CI = () × 100 and AD [(] × 100, where = weight of food consumed, = mean weight of insect over unit time, = change in body weight and = weight of feces produced during the feeding period. The metabolic cost (MC) was calculated as 100-ECD.

4. Statistical Treatment of Data

Statistical analyses were carried out using Graph Pad Prism 4 (Graph Pad software version 4.0, San Diego, CA, USA). To detect significant differences in mean larval weights, the pooled treatment data was subjected to two way repeated measures ANOVA (SAS 1999). Comparisons were made for all parameters within the amounts of inhibitor used as well as the different days of larval development. Simple comparisons, where ever appropriate was made using unpaired -tests. Results with were considered to be statistically significant. For all bioassays, means and standard errors (SE) of the insect were calculated for each treatment.

5. Results

5.1. Evaluation of MiTI Purity (with Each Purity Level)

The specific activity, yield performance, and inhibitory activity with each purity level of MiTI have been detailed in Table 1 (Supplementary data available online at During each step of purification the specific activity and percent inhibition of MiTI increased with the decrease in its total yield. The protein eluted on gel filtration represented inhibition (~64%) of midgut trypsin-like activities was loaded on trypsin affinity column (Figure 1(a), Supplementary data). The protein eluted from affinity column represented a considerable inhibition (~76%) against trypsin like midgut proteinases, was pooled and lyophilized (Figure 1(b), Supplementary data). A purification of 3.66-fold with a 15.73% yield was achieved (Table 1, Supplementary data). SDS-PAGE in the presence or absence of β-mercaptoethanol showed that MiTI consisted of a single polypeptide chain with a molecular mass of about 19.8 kDa (Figure 1).

5.2. Inhibition Assay of HGP by MiTI

Inhibition assays of HGP extract using purified proteinase inhibitor from Madhuca indica (MiTI) demonstrated inhibition of HGP. MiTI showed high inhibitory activity towards both trypsin like HGP and total gut proteolytic activity (Figure 2). MiTI (5 μg/mL) inhibited approximately 76% trypsin like and 87.51% total gut proteolytic activity of H. armigera. Percent inhibition of trypsin-like HGP activity by standard SBTI was ~92% greater than MiTI activity (Figure 2). The calculated IC50 value of MiTI for midgut trypsin like proteinases was 1.75 μg/mL (Figure 3).

5.3. In Vitro Stability of MiTI at Various pHs and Temperatures

Stability of the inhibitor at different pH (2–12) was determined. MiTI exhibited stability at a pH of 6.0 to 11.0, with maximum stability in a pH range 7 to 8 (Figure 4(a)). Temperature stability at an extensive range of temperatures (10–100°C) was also measured. Results showed that inhibitor was stable up to 60°C. The effectiveness of inhibitor decreased significantly following rise of temperature above 70°C (Figure 4(b)).

5.4. Kinetic Determination

Various concentrations of MiTI were assayed in order to determine the mechanism and inhibition constant towards trypsin like midgut proteinases by using various BApNA concentrations as substrate according to Singh et al. [13]. The inhibition kinetic data was analyzed by Dixon and Lineweaver-Burk plots. The kinetic analysis showed that MiTI inhibition of trypsin like midgut proteinases was competitive (Figure 5(b)) with a value of 4.1 × 10−10 M (Figure 5(a)).

5.5. Antimetabolic Effect of MiTI on Developmental Physiology of H. armigera

To estimate the in vivo effects of MiTI on growth and development of H. armigera larvae, feeding trials were conducted with appropriate controls. Three different doses of inhibitor were incorporated into an artificial diet at levels of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 (% w/w). These three concentrations were chosen because the effects of MiTI at these concentrations on larval survival were considered appropriate for in vivo experiments. Food intake was drastically reduced in the larvae showing growth retardation. During 0–6 larval development days there was no significant change among various treatments, whereas the reduction in larval weight varied remarkably among different treatment groups during their remaining growth period (Figure 6(a)). Maximum growth retardation was observed in 12–14 larval development days as compared to control. From the above results, it is suggested that the inhibitor concentration of MiTI used in the diet was sufficient to inhibit the growth of larvae.

The LD50 of MiTI to H. armigera was estimated to be 1.5% w/w and the ED50 value of MiTI was 1.0% w/w diet (Figure 6(b)). The estimated LD50 and ED50 concentrations of MiTI were used to assess the effects on survival, development, and fecundity of the H. armigera larvae.

The potential insecticidal effects of MiTI towards the relative growth rate of H. armigera larvae were assessed by incorporating different concentrations of the inhibitor in the larval base diet. Relative growth rate was significantly more in the larvae reared on control diet compared to those reared on the test diet. Relative growth rate of H. armigera (12–14 development day) larvae on MiTI containing diet has been reported to be significantly lower than in the larvae of other development days. The slowest relative growth rate (0.56) was observed for larvae maintained with 1.5% w/w MiTI concentration against the control (Figure 6(c)).

There was a marked reduction in body weight of larvae maintained on MiTI containing diet, whereas larvae on base diet showed better development (Figure 7(a)). Furthermore, duration of the larval development, pupation, and pupal development duration was also delayed and marked by stunted growth (Figure 7(c)). The mean duration of the larval stage on control diet was 16 days and diet containing MiTI (1.5% w/w) was 22.8 days. The mean duration of the pupal stage were 2.5 days in the control diet and 5.2 days in the diet included with MiTI (1.5% w/w).

The pupation rate, adult emergence, deformities and fecundity were also recorded. The MiTI (1.5% w/w) treatment significantly reduced pupation rate and emergence of H. armigera larvae. Pupation rate was lowest (67.2%) in larvae reared on diet supplemented with 1.5% w/w MiTI; whereas adult emergence from 1.5% w/w MiTI treated larvae decreased (38.7%) as compared to control larvae. The MiTI containing diets enhanced percent deformities and slowed down the fecundity of H. armigera. Among the treated, high percent deformities in pupae and adult insects were observed in larvae reared on diet impregnated with 0.5% w/w (25.8%), 1.0% w/w (37.1%) and 1.5% w/w (52.3%) as compared to control (5.3%) (Table 2 Supplementary data). It is interesting to observe that the mean fecundity was drastically affected in moths emerging from diet containing 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5% w/w MiTI diet (Table 2 Supplementary data). The downfall in mean fecundity was dose dependent. The reduction observed was 62.5% and 49.4% at MiTI concentrations of 1.0 and 1.5% w/w, respectively.

5.6. Nutritional Indices

Nutritional indices of fourth and fifth instar larvae of H. armigera are provided in Table 3 (Supplementary data). The MiTI fed fourth instar larvae showed higher values of CI (67.87), MC (84.32%), and AD (61.26%), and lower values of ECD (15.68%), and ECI (9.6%) as compared to control diet. CI (58.36%), AD (42.52%), ECI (7.79%), and MC (81.51%) of fifth instar larvae reared on inhibitor containing diet showed lower values as compared to fourth instar larvae. ECD of fourth instar larvae was lower than the fifth instars larvae.

6. Discussion

The purification of MiTI was carried out using ammonium sulfate precipitation, subsequent dialysis, gel filtration, and affinity chromatography. In each step specific activity increased with the fold purification. During each step of purification the recovered protein exhibited an increase in inhibitory activity. Purification and inhibitory potential of nonhost proteinase inhibitors have also been reported from various other plants [2426].

After subsequent assays with MiTI the presence of trypsin inhibitor was confirmed and measured in each purity level. BApNA and azocasein substrates were used to assess the presence and absence of inhibitors in Madhuca indica seed extract. Fourth instar larvae were used for in vitro experiments because this larval stage exhibits maximum proteinase activity and maximum numbers of proteinase isoforms [27, 28]. As the digestive gut proteinases of lepidopteran insects are optimally active in alkaline medium therefore inhibition assays using HGP extract with MiTI were studied in the basic pH range [29].

Different concentrations of inhibitor extract were used to evaluate the potential of MiTI for inhibiting HGP activity. Standard SBTI used as positive control was highly effective as compared to MiTI against gut enzymes at the equal inhibitor concentration. These findings were also in concurrence with the findings of some other research groups [19, 30]. The results indicated that total inhibitory activity of HGP was more than trypsin like inhibitory activity; suggesting the presence of different proteinases in the gut of H. armigera. This higher percent inhibition towards total HGP is possibly an outcome of inhibition of proteinases, other than those which possess trypsin-like activity [31]. Thus, this higher inhibitory activity towards general proteolysis with a nonhost PI would be more attractive in plant defense due to more diverse and detrimental effects on larval growth and physiology [32]. Larval diet containing MiTI showed decreased proteolytic activities of the midgut. The toxic effect of the inhibitor slows down larval midgut proteinase activity by blocking the enzymes engaged in the process of digestion. Inhibitors extracted from chickpea (P-256) inhibited 66% H. armigera midgut trypsin activity [33]. Inhibition of more than 80% of H. armigera proteinase activity has also been reported with nonhost PIs from bitter gourd [34]. Similarly inhibitors isolated from the seeds of Prosophis juliflora exhibited 83% inhibition against H. armigera midgut trypsin-like activity [35]. The IC50 of MiTI for trypsin like midgut proteinases was 1.75 μg/mL, which was less effective than standard SBTI (0.13 μg/mL) [31, 32].

Affinity purified MiTI was stable in a broad range of temperature and pH. Inhibitory activity of MiTI exposed to different pH, was stable predominantly in alkaline conditions (pH 6.0–11). The optimal pH for digestive proteases in most lepidopteran larvae falls in alkaline condition with a maximal pH of 10 and 11 [36]. Trypsin inhibitor isolated from pigeon pea and jack fruit seeds were also stable over a wider range of pH from 7–10 and 3–12 respectively [37].

MiTI was also stable over a wide range of temperature (20–60°C) but at higher temperatures the inhibitory activity decreased remarkably. Trypsin inhibitors isolated from oat was stable in a wide range of temperatures from 0 to 100°C [38]. A high stability of PIs is an outcome of hydrophobic interactions of short stretches of hydrogen bonded sheets [39]/disulfide linkages minimizing their conformational entropy and consequently enhances their stability [40].

Serine proteinase inhibitors are capable of high affinity inhibition by competitive or noncompetitive mechanisms [39, 41]. The inhibition constant of MiTI for trypsin like midgut proteinases was 4.1 × 10−10 M, suggesting a high affinity of the MiTI for trypsin like midgut proteinases. Similar values were reported for other trypsin inhibitors from Caesalpinia bonduc seeds (2.75 × 10−10 M) [42], Derris trifoliate (1.7 × 10−10 M) [39], Dimorphandra mollis (5.3 × 10−10 M) [43], and Putranjiva roxburghii (1.4 × 10−11 M) [44]. Kinetic studies have also shown competitive inhibition of trypsin by MiTI. H. armigera larvae maintained on MiTI dosage inhibited the larval growth and development. Feeding studies demonstrated that MiTI inhibited the growth of H. armigera larvae. Starvation and added stress on gut proteinase expression system to synthesize new and higher amounts of proteinases could be the possible reasons for arrested growth and mortality of H. armigera larvae [13, 44]. The inhibitors from chickpea, mungbean, and jambul also showed significant reduction in larval growth of H. armigera [13, 45]. MiTI delays larval and pupal developmental periods and causes several deformities in neonates. The duration of pupation increased due to interference of MiTI in the moulting process; consequently the larvae were not able to go into further developmental stages of their life cycle. In general, prolonged pupation times directly affected the survival of pupae.

Deformities of neonatal adults reared on different MiTI containing artificial diets were examined. Low survival rate and reduction in fecundity (number of eggs laid down per female) were observed in MiTI treated larvae. The MiTI was strongly effective in reduction of fertility and fecundity which persisted for successive generations. The fecundity of lepidopteran adults is the most commonly used parameter for determining the effect of larval diet on the adult stage. In vivo study suggested that quality of diet influences the effectiveness of the inhibitor [46]. Fecundity of H. armigera was severely affected by 0.33% concentration of winged bean PI diet [47]. Telang et al. [34] reported a similar effect on H. armigera and S. litura by using PI from nonhost source such as bitter gourd in the diet. The tomato PIs also cause dose dependent adverse effects on various developmental parameters of H. armigera, most notably on fecundity [28].

Nutritional indices study revealed the antinutritional property of MiTI. ECI is generally a measure of an insect’s capability to exploit the food ingested for growth [48]. Along with nutritional indices, ECI may vary with the digestibility of food and the proportional amount of the digestible portion of food, which is converted to body mass and metabolized for energy essential for vital activities [48]. In the present study change in ECD also indicates the increased/decreased proportion of digested food metabolized for energy [49]. A nearby or no change in ECI and ECD values as compared to control point out that ingested biochemicals such as PIs do not exhibit any chronic toxicity [50]. However the nutritional indices of the fourth and fifth instar larvae of H. armigera were significantly different as compared to control. Therefore the data obtained for the fourth and fifth instar larvae are not dependable on each other. This fact describes that the nutritional requirements of an insect changes during development and such changes are dependent on food consumption and feeding behavior [51]. The higher ECI value of H. armigera for fourth instar larvae as compared to control suggests that they were more capable to convert the ingested food into biomass. As compared to fifth instar larvae, fourth instar larvae had lower value of ECD; implying that they were incapable to turn the digested food into biomass. An increased AD value observed for MiTI-fed larvae was most likely a result of the lower fecal output by treated larvae relative to the control group. This fact was also observed by Mordue and Blackwell [52] and Rayapuram and Baldwin [53].

These results from both in vivo and in vitro studies clearly showed that the MiTI isolated from the seeds of Madhuca indica is a strong and effective proteinase inhibitor against the growth and development of H. armigera. Further, this inhibitor protein could be exploited in insect-pest management of food crops.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The investigation was supported by a Grant to the corresponding author (Farrukh Jamal) from Council of Science and Technology, U.P., India (CST/SERPD/D-1136).

Supplementary Materials

The data available here is about the inhibitor purification from Madhuca indica (MiTI) based on trypsin-like activity of H. armigera midgut proteinases. Sephadex G-75 gel filtration chromatography follows trypsin-sepharose affinity column. The nutritional indices of Helicoverpa armigera larvae reared on MiTI supplemented diet is also tabulated.

  1. Supplementary Material


  1. N. S. Talekar, R. T. Opeña, and P. Hanson, “Helicoverpa armigera management: a review of AVRDC's research on host plant resistance in tomato,” Crop Protection, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 461–467, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. W. T. Tay, M. F. Soria, T. Walsh et al., “A brave new world for an old world pest: Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, article 11, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  3. Y. Yang, Y. Li, and Y. Wu, “Current status of insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera after 15 years of Bt cotton planting in China,” Journal of Economic Entomology, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 375–381, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. A. Gatehouse, “Plant resistance towards insect herbivores: a dynamic interaction,” New Phytologist, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 145–169, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. O. Mello and M. C. Silva-Filho, “Plant-insect interactions: an evolutionary arms race between two distinct defense mechanisms,” Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 71–81, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  6. W. R. Terra and C. Ferreira, “Insect digestive enzymes: properties, compartmentalization and function,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B: Comparative Biochemistry, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 1–62, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. F. Jamal, P. K. Pandey, D. Singh, and M. Y. Khan, “Serine protease inhibitors in plants: nature's arsenal crafted for insect predators,” Phytochemistry Reviews, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–34, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. T. Christeller, W. A. Laing, N. P. Markwick, and E. P. J. Burgess, “Midgut protease activities in 12 phytophagous lepidopteran larvae: dietary and protease inhibitor interactions,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 735–746, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. L. S. Lopes, N. F. Valadares, D. I. Moraes, J. C. Rosa, H. S. S. Araújo, and L. M. Beltramini, “Physico-chemical and antifungal properties of protease inhibitors from Acacia plumosa,” Phytochemistry, vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 871–879, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Iwanaga, N. Yamasaki, M. Kimura, and Y. Kouzuma, “Contribution of conserved Asn residues to the inhibitory activities of Kunitz-type protease inhibitors from plants,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 220–223, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. V. D. Parde, H. C. Sharma, and M. S. Kachole, “In vivo inhibition of Helicoverpa armigera gut pro-proteinase activation by non-host plant protease inhibitors,” Journal of Insect Physiology, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 1315–1324, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. P. Chougule, E. Doyle, E. Fitches, and J. A. Gatehouse, “Biochemical characterization of midgut digestive proteases from Mamestra brassicae (cabbage moth; Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and effect of soybean Kunitz inhibitor (SKTI) in feeding assays,” Journal of Insect Physiology, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 563–572, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. D. Singh, F. Jamal, and P. K. Pandey, “Kinetic assessment and effect on developmental physiology of a trypsin inhibitor from Eugenia jambolana (Jambul) seeds on Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner),” Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 94–113, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. K. Pandey and F. Jamal, “Identification and evaluation of trypsin inhibitor in the seed extracts of Butea monosperma (Flame of forest),” International Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 6, pp. 513–520, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  15. B. F. Erlanger, N. Kokowsky, and W. Cohen, “The preparation and properties of two new chromogenic substrates of trypsin,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 271–278, 1961. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. M. Bradford, “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 1-2, pp. 248–254, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. U. K. Laemmli, “Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4,” Nature, vol. 227, no. 5259, pp. 680–685, 1970. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. R. M. Brock, C. W. Forsberg, and J. G. Buchanan-Smith, “Proteolytic activity of rumen microorganisms and effects of proteinase inhibitors,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 561–569, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  19. K. A. Johnston, M. J. Lee, C. Brough, V. A. Hilder, A. M. R. Gatehouse, and J. A. Gatehouse, “Protease activities in the larval midgut of Heliothis virescens: evidence for trypsin and chymotrypsin-like enzymes,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 375–383, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Dixon, “The determination of enzyme inhibitor constants,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 170–171, 1953. View at: Google Scholar
  21. A. P. Giri and M. S. Kachole, “Amylase inhibitors of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) seeds,” Phytochemistry, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 197–202, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. R. Farrar, J. D. Barbour, and G. G. Kenedy, “Quantifying food consumption and growth in insects,” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 82, pp. 593–598, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  23. H. Chi, Computer Program for the Probit analysis, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, 1997.
  24. A. M. Harsulkar, A. P. Giri, A. G. Patankar et al., “Successive use of non-host plant proteinase inhibitors required for effective inhibition of Helicoverpa armigera gut proteinases and larval growth,” Plant Physiology, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 497–506, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. C. Lawrence and S. Suzanne Nielsen, “Partial isolation and characterization of a cysteine proteinase inhibitor from lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus),” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 1020–1025, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. P. K. Pandey, D. Singh, S. Singh, M. Y. Khan, and F. Jamal, “A nonhost peptidase inhibitor of ~14 kDa from Butea monosperma (Lam.) Taub. seeds affects negatively the growth and developmental physiology of Helicoverpa armigera,” Biochemistry Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 361821, 11 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. G. Patankar, A. P. Giri, A. M. Harsulkar et al., “Complexity in specificities and expression of Helicoverpa armigera gut proteinases explains polyphagous nature of the insect pest,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 31, no. 4-5, pp. 453–464, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. S. Damle, A. P. Giri, M. N. Sainani, and V. S. Gupta, “Higher accumulation of proteinase inhibitors in flowers than leaves and fruits as a possible basis for differential feeding preference of Helicoverpa armigera on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill, Cv. Dhanashree),” Phytochemistry, vol. 66, no. 22, pp. 2659–2667, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. M. Harsulkar, A. P. Giri, V. S. Gupta et al., “Characterization of Helicoverpa armigera gut proteinases and their interaction with proteinase inhibitors using gel X-ray film contact print technique,” Electrophoresis, vol. 19, no. 8-9, pp. 1397–1402, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Z. Ahmad, M. Saleemuddin, and M. Siddi, “Purification and characterization of three alkaline proteases from the gut of the larva of army worm, Spodoptera litura,” Insect Biochemistry, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 667–673, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. R. Babu and B. Subrahmanyam, “Bio-potency of serine proteinase inhibitors from Acacia senegal seeds on digestive proteinases, larval growth and development of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner),” Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 349–358, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. Srinivasan, A. P. Giri, A. M. Harsulkar, J. A. Gatehouse, and V. S. Gupta, “A Kunitz trypsin inhibitor from chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) that exerts anti-metabolic effect on podborer (Helicoverpa armigera) larvae,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 359–374, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. R. Kansal, R. N. Gupta, K. R. Koundal et al., “Purification and characterization of trypsin inhibitor from Cicer arietinum L. and its efficacy against Helicoverpa armigera,” Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 313–322, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  34. M. Telang, A. Srinivasan, A. Patankar et al., “Bitter gourd proteinase inhibitors: potential growth inhibitors of Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera litura,” Phytochemistry, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 643–652, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. Sivakumar, O. L. Franco, P. D. Tagliari, C. Bloch Jr., M. Mohan, and B. Thayumanavan, “Screening and purification of a novel trypsin inhibitor from Prosopis juliflora seeds with activity toward pest digestive enzymes,” Protein and Peptide Letters, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 561–565, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K. A. Johnston, M. J. Lee, J. A. Gatehouse, and J. H. Anstee, “The partial purification and characterisation of serine protease activity in midgut of larval Helicoverpa armigera,” Insect Biochemistry, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 389–397, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  37. S. S. Annapurna, C. S. Ramadoss, and D. S. Prasad, “Characterization of a trypsin/chymotrypsin inhibitor from jack fruit (Artocarpus integrifolia) seeds,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 54, pp. 605–618, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  38. M. Mikola and A. Mikkonen, “Occurrence and stabilities of oat trypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitors,” Journal of Cereal Science, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 227–235, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  39. A. Bhattacharyya and C. R. Babu, “Purification and biochemical characterization of a serine proteinase inhibitor from Derris trifoliata Lour. seeds: insight into structural and antimalarial features,” Phytochemistry, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 703–712, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. P. R. Ramasarma, A. G. Appu Rao, and D. R. Rao, “Role of disulfide linkages in structure and activity of proteinase inhibitor from horsegram (Dolichos biflorus),” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1248, no. 1, pp. 35–42, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. L. R. Macedo, C. M. de Sá, M. D. G. M. Freire, and J. R. P. Parra, “A Kunitz-Type Inhibitor of Coleopteran Proteases, Isolated from Adenanthera pavonina L. Seeds and Its Effect on Callosobruchus maculatus,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 2533–2540, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. Bhattacharyya, S. Rai, and C. R. Babu, “A trypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitor from Caesalpinia bonduc seeds: isolation, partial characterization and insecticidal properties,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 45, no. 3-4, pp. 169–177, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. L. R. Macedo, D. G. G. de Matos, O. L. T. Machado, S. Marangoni, and J. C. Novello, “Trypsin inhibitor from Dimorphandra mollis seeds: purification and properties,” Phytochemistry, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 553–558, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. P. J. Sarate, V. A. Tamhane, H. M. Kotkar et al., “Developmental and digestive flexibilities in the midgut of a polyphagous pest, the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera,” Journal of Insect Science, vol. 12, article 42, pp. 1–16, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. K. Sudheendra and V. H. Mulimani, “Effect of feeding legume proteinase inhibitors on Helicoverpa armigera gut proteinase activity,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology (ICPN '02), vol. 9, pp. 51–53, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  46. P. Pompermayer, M. C. Falco, J. R. P. Parra, and M. C. Silva-Filho, “Coupling diet quality and Bowman-Birk and Kunitz-type soybean proteinase inhibitor effectiveness to Diatraea saccharalis development and mortality,” Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 217–224, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. G. P. Gupta, P. K. Ranjekar, A. Birah, S. Rani, V. Gupta, and M. N. Sainani, “Effective inhibition of Helicoverpa armigera by non-host plant proteinase inhibitors,” ICAR News, vol. 8, pp. 1–2, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  48. H. R. Abdel-Rahman and R. N. Al-Mozini, “Antifeedant and toxic activity of some plant extracts against larvae of cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae),” Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 10, no. 24, pp. 4467–4472, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. S. Nathan, P. G. Chung, and K. Murugan, “Effect of biopesticides applied separately or together on nutritional indices of the rice leaffolder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis,” Phytoparasitica, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 187–195, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. O. Koul, W. M. Daniewski, J. S. Multani, M. Gumulka, and G. Singh, “Antifeedant effects of the limonoids from Entandrophragma candolei (Meliaceae) on the Gram Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae),” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 25, pp. 7271–7275, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. B. L. Browne, “Ontogenetic changes in feeding behavior,” in Regulatory Mechanisms in Insect Feeding, R. F. Chapman and G. de Boer, Eds., pp. 307–342, Chapman & Hall, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  52. A. J. Mordue and A. Blackwell, “Azadirachtin: an update,” Journal of Insect Physiology, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 903–924, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  53. C. Rayapuram and I. T. Baldwin, “Using nutritional indices to study LOX3-dependent insect resistance,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1585–1594, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Farrukh Jamal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1104 Views | 460 Downloads | 9 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.