Review Article

Pharmacological Strategies to Prevent Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury

Table 9

Clinical trials comparing theophylline with placebo and other agents for prophylaxis of contrast-induced AKI after angiography.

AuthorsYearType of procedure and contrast mediaNumber of patients
Intervention versus control
Study protocolIntravascular volume expansion and NAC protocolCI-AKI definitionMean GFR
Intervention versus control (mL/min/1.73 m2)
Incidence of CI-AKIRRT requirement
Intervention versus control (%)
InterventionControlIntervention versus control (%) value

Huber et al. [107]2002CAG/PAG
Iomeprol
50 versus
50
Theophylline 200 mg IV 30 minutes beforePlaceboND↑Cr ≥0.5/2 days *Cr 2.07 versus
1.92
4 versus
16
0.042ND

Huber et al. [108]2003CAG
Imeron
50 versus
50
Theophylline 200 mg IV 30 minutes beforePlaceboND↑Cr ≥0.5/2 days *Cr 1.65 versus
1.72
4 versus
20
0.0138ND

Dussol et al. [33]2006Various procedures
Ioxaglate, iobitriodol and iopromide
80 versus
76 versus 77 versus 79
Theophylline 5 mg/kg 1 hour before(1) NaCl 0.1 g/kg po 2 days
(2) NSS 15 ml/kg IV 6 hours
(3) (2) NSS 15 mL/kg IV 6 hours and
Furosemide 3 mg/kg IV
ND↑Cr ≥0.5/2 days33 versus
38 versus 33 versus 34
7.5 versus
6.6 versus 5.2 versus 15.2
ND0 versus
0 versus 0 versus 0

Huber et al. [109]2006Various procedures
Imeron
51 versus
50 versus 49
Theophylline 200 mg IV 30 minutes before(1) NAC 600 mg IV bid
(2) Combination
According to underlying disease↑Cr ≥0.5/2 days *Cr 1.25 versus
1.25 versus 1.28
2 versus
12 versus 4
0.047
0.53**
2.7

Baskurt et al. [110]2009CAG
Ioversol
72 versus
72 versus 73
Theophylline200 mg +
NAC 600 mg po bid
(1) None
(2) NAC 600 mg po bid
NSS 1 mL/kg/h 12 hours before and after↑Cr ≥0.5/2 days *Cr 1.47 versus
1.3 versus 1.39
0 versus
6.9 versus 9.6
0.0330 versus
0

Kinbara et al. [111]2010CAG
Iopamidol
15 versus 15Theophylline 250 mg IV 30 minutes before(1) None
(2) NAC 704 mg po bid
NSS 1 mL/kg/h 30 minutes before and
10 hours after
↑Cr ≥0.5/2 days63.4 versus
63.7 versus 62.4
0 versus
26.7 versus 0
0.01090 versus
0

Bilasy et al. [112]2012CAG
Iopamidol
30 versus
30
Theophylline 200 mg in NSS 100 mL IV 30 minutes before and
NAC 600 mg po bid
Placebo and
NAC 600 mg po bid
NSS 1 mL/kg/h 12 hours before and after
(In case of CHF
NSS 0.5 mL/kg/h)
↑Cr ≥25%/3 days or
↑Cr ≥0.5/3 days
58.6 versus
61.8
0 versus
20
0.01ND

Abizaid et al. [101]1999CAG
Hexabrix
20 versus
20 versus 20
Aminophylline IV 4 mg/kg then 0.4 mg/kg/h 2 hours before(1) None
(2) Dopamine 2.5 mcg/kg/h 2 hours before
N/2 1 mL/kg/h 12 hours before and after↑Cr≥ 25%/2 days *Cr 1.9 versus
2.3 versus 1.9
35 versus
30 versus 50
0.605 versus
0 versus 0

 *Mean GFR data is not available. Data is shown as mean serum creatinine in mg/dL.
** value of intervention group compare to combination group.
bid: twice daily; CAG: coronary angiography; CHF: congestive heart failure; CI-AKI: contrast-induced acute kidney injury; Cr: creatinine; g: gram; D5W: 5% dextrose solution; h: hour; IV: intravenous; kg: kilogram body weight; mg: milligram; mL: milliliter; NAC: N-acetylcysteine; ND: no data; NSS: normal saline solution; N/2: 0.45% NaCl; po: per oral route; q12h: every 12 hours; RRT: renal replacement therapy.