Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 246871, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/246871
Research Article

Cloning, Expression, Purification, and Characterization of Glutaredoxin from Antarctic Sea-Ice Bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. AN178

1School of Marine and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai 264209, China
2Shandong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Marine Health Food (Taixiang Group), Rongcheng 264300, China
3Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Processing Technology of Frozen Prepared Food (Taixiang Group), Rongcheng 264300, China

Received 28 April 2014; Revised 22 June 2014; Accepted 24 June 2014; Published 7 July 2014

Academic Editor: Bo Zuo

Copyright © 2014 Quanfu Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Glutaredoxins (Grxs) are small ubiquitous redox enzymes that catalyze glutathione-dependent reactions to reduce protein disulfide. In this study, a full-length Grx gene (PsGrx) with 270 nucleotides was isolated from Antarctic sea-ice bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. AN178. It encoded deduced 89 amino acid residues with the molecular weight 9.8 kDa. Sequence analysis of the amino acid sequence revealed the catalytic motif CPYC. Recombinant PsGrx (rPsGrx) stably expressed in E. coli BL21 was purified to apparent homogeneity by Ni-affinity chromatography. rPsGrx exhibited optimal activity at 30°C and pH 8.0 and showed 25.5% of the activity at 0°C. It retained 65.0% of activity after incubation at 40°C for 20 min and still exhibited 37.0% activity in 1.0 M NaCl. These results indicated that rPsGrx was a typical cold active protein with low thermostability.

1. Introduction

Glutaredoxins (Grxs) are ubiquitous small disulfide oxidoreductases and members of the thioredoxin (Trx) fold superfamily. They catalyze the reduction of protein disulfides and of glutathione- (GSH-) protein mixed disulfides in a coupled system with GSH, NADPH, and glutathione reductase (GR) [1]. Grxs were first discovered in E. coli as a hydrogen donor for ribonucleotide reductase and regulated protein activity by reversibly reducing disulfide bonds in their targets to achieve their role in antioxidative response [2]. Subsequently, Grxs have been isolated and identified from different organisms, including E. coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Synechocystis PCC 6803, Oryza sativa, Populus trichocarpa, and human Homo sapiens [36]. For example, in yeast 8 members of Grxs have been found, named Grx1 to Grx8 in chronological order of identification [3, 5]. 31 members of Grxs in Arabidopsis, 4 members of Grxs in E. coli, and 3 Grxs members in humans were discovered and studied [7]. Grxs could participate in a variety of cellular functions, such as providing reduction of equivalents for ribonucleotide reductase, antioxidant defense, control of cellular redox state, and the redox control of transcription and signal transduction [8, 9]. Thus Grxs from different species, or even different strains of the same species, may differ in their structural, catalytic, and functional properties.

Antarctic sea-ice is considered the unique, mostly pristine, and extreme environment. Microbes living within the sea-ice have a high degree of biochemical and physiological adaptation to low temperature, high level of dissolved oxygen, and changeable salinity conditions [10]. Several studies have shown that such extreme environments can induce excessive accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which will damage macromolecules and thus change normal signal conduction in Antarctic microbes [11, 12]. To cope with such oxidative damage and insure normal signaling events, Antarctic microbes have developed complex and precisely controlled antioxidant systems by regulating cellular gene expression which enables organisms to maintain proteins and other cellular components as usual. Antarctic fungi Penicillium sp. could increase activities of antioxidant enzymes such as catalase and superoxide dismutase for adaptation to the high oxygen concentration [13]. Thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase from the Antarctic psychrophilic eubacterium Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis were investigated through the heterologous expression of their genes and the biochemical investigation on the recombinant proteins [14]. Our recent studies have suggested that glutathione S-transferase (GST) can play a major role in a coordinated protection mechanism against low temperature in Antarctic sea-ice bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. [15]. Glutaredoxins, as antioxidant proteins, were known to be involved in ROS elimination and cellular oxidative-reductive balance [16]. Thus, Antarctic sea-ice microorganisms would be the new and potential sources of oxidative stress-inducible enzymes. To our knowledge, Grxs from Antarctic bacteria have been not biochemically characterized. The present work reports the molecular cloning, expression, and characterization of a novel Grx from sea-ice bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. AN178.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacteria Cultivation and Collection

Strain AN178 was identified as Pseudoalteromonas sp. based on 16S rRNA gene sequence. It was isolated from Antarctic sea-ice (68°30′E, 65°00′S) and was used as a source of the gene encoding Grx. Vector pET-28a (+) and E. coli BL21(DE3) were used for Grx gene cloning and expression.

Strain Pseudoalteromonas sp. AN178 was inoculated in the 2216E medium (peptone 0.5%, yeast extract 0.1%, pH 7.5, made by natural sea water) with shaking at 120 rpm and 8°C. E. coli strains containing recombinant plasmids were cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium containing kanamycin (100 mg/L).

2.2. DNA Manipulation and Cloning of PsGrx

The genomic DNA was isolated by using a Genomic DNA Prep Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA purification was done using Gel DNA Purification Kit Ver.2.0 (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). One primer set (5′-AGGAATATRATGAGTAATGTTGTBTTAT-3′, 5′-ATTATAYTTAGTTAAATTTAAGCGTTBAGT-3′) was designed based on the nucleotide sequences immediately upstream and downstream the known coding sequences of Grx from the genera Pseudoalteromonas. PCR reaction was carried out with the following protocol: denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 47°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1.5 min, and a 10 min final extension at 72°C.

2.3. Sequence Analysis

The open reading frame (ORF) for the PsGrx gene was determined using ORF finder (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/) and translated into the corresponding amino acid sequence. Protein identity and amino acid sequence of PsGrx were determined by using the BLAST tool in the NCBI website and the conserved amino acids were also determined by using ClustalW program (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/clustalw2/index.html). Theoretical pI values and predicted molecular masses were calculated using Prot-Param tools (http://kr.expasy.org/tools/protparam.htm​l).

2.4. Expression and Purification of the PsGrx

The open reading frame of the DNA encoding PsGrx was amplified by PCR with the upstream primer 5′-CAGGGATCCATGAGTAATGTTGTTTT-3′ (the BamHI site was underlined) and the downstream primer 5′-TATAAGCTTAGCGTTTAGTGTGGCAT-3′ (the HindIII site was underlined). The PCR amplified fragment was digested with BamHI and HindIII and cloned into the expression vector pET-28a (+) to construct pETgrx. After checking the correct sequences, the recombinant vector was introduced into E. coli BL21(DE3).

Grx-fused protein was expressed in E. coli. Positive clones were screened on LB broth containing kanamycin (100 mg/L) and grown with shaking at 200 rpm for overnight at 37°C. IPTG (final concentration of 0.12 mg/mL) was added to the medium at the A600 value of 0.6–0.8. After additional cultivation at 37°C for 5 h, the cells were harvested by centrifugation (7500 ×g for 15 min at 4°C) and washed with an appropriate volume of sterile water.

Recombinant PsGrx (rPsGrx) was mainly expressed as inclusion bodies. After the cells were homogenized by ultrasonic treatment, the inclusion bodies were collected by centrifugation (12,000 ×g for 10 min at 4°C). Inclusion bodies were dissolved by the binding buffer (8 mM Urea, 5 mM imidazole, 500 mM NaCl, and 20 mM Tris-HCl) at 5 mL per gram wet weight. The cell suspension was stirred for 60 min at room temperature, and the soluble fraction was collected by centrifugation (12,000 ×g for 15 min at 4°C). The soluble fraction was loaded to the Ni-NTA resin affinity chromatography, following the manufacturer’s recommendations. The protein was eluted with an imidazole gradient (40, 100, and 250 mM) with five column volumes at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Purified protein was dialyzed by PBST containing gradient decreasing concentrations of 6, 4, 2, and 0 M urea. After a thorough dialysis the solution protein was collected and stored at 4°C. 12.5% SDS-PAGE was applied for confirmation of the expressed product. The protein concentration was measured by Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 method using bovine serum albumin as the standard.

2.5. Grx Activity Assay

Grx activity was performed as described by monitoring the consumption of NADPH at 340 nm during the GSH-dependent reduction of 8 mM β-hydroxyethyl disulfide (HED) using 1 mM GSH coupled with of 0.6 units of yeast GR (Sigma) [17]. One unit of Grx activity was defined as the amount required to oxidize 1 μM of NADPH per min at 25°C.

2.6. Biochemical Properties of rPsGrx

The optimal temperature for rPsGrx in the range of 0°C to 60°C was determined in Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) over 10 min using the standard assay method. The thermal stability for rPsGrx was measured by incubating the protein at 40°C and 50°C for 10, 20, 30, and 40 min in Tris-HCl (pH 7.0), respectively and then directly put into an ice water bath and the residual activity was measured as described by using the standard assay. The optimal pH for rPsGrx was determined at 25°C in the range of pH 5.0 to 10.0 by using the following buffers: sodium acetate/acetic acid (pH 5.0), NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4 (pH 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, and 8.0), and Tris-HCl (pH 8.0, 9.0, and 10.0). Effects of metal ions and various other agents on the Grx activity were also investigated in the standard assay, and the concentration of each reagent was indicated in Table 1. For this, the protein was incubated with various compounds in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) at 20°C for 1 h. Residual activity was determined under optimal protein assay conditions. Activity assayed in the absence of any additives was taken as 100%. The kinetic properties for the rPsGrx were determined at varying concentrations of HED (0.4 to 8 mM) with a fixed concentration of GSH (1 mM). Three independent experiments were performed at each substrate concentration, and the apparent and were calculated from Lineweaver-Burk plots.

tab1
Table 1: Effect of various compounds on the rPsGrx activity.

3. Results

3.1. Gene Cloning and Sequence Analysis

A full-length Grx gene (Genbank accession no: KF361316) from P. sp. AN178, designated PsGrx, was composed of 270 nucleotides encoding 89 amino acid residues. The calculated molecular weight and isoelectric point of PsGrx were 9.8 kDa and pH 5.2, respectively. In the amino acid sequence of PsGrx, the total number of negatively charged residues (Asp + Glu) was 10, while the total number of positively charged residues (Arg + Lys) was 8. Multiple sequence alignment revealed the conserved GSH binding site (G-site) (Lys9, Cys12, Pro13, Phe14, Gly50, Thr53, and Val54), and catalytic residues (Cys12 and Cys15) were identified in the sequence (Figure 1). The blast search in the NCBI GenBank using the deduced amino acid sequence of PsGrx revealed that it had high sequence similarity to Trx-superfamily. The amino acid sequence of PsGrx shared 85.6%, 74.4%, 74.4%, 72.2%, and 50.0% identity with P. haloplanktis TAC 125 Grx (YP_338909), P. agarivorans Grx (WP_004588615), P. haloplanktis Grx (WP_016708488), P. undina Grx (WP_010391834), and R. nanhaiensis Grx (WP_008217797), respectively. This indicated that PsGrx could be a novel Grx belonging to Trx-like superfamily.

246871.fig.001
Figure 1: Alignment of amino acid sequences of PsGrx with the sequences of other Grxs. The displayed sequences are Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis Grx (YP_338909), Pseudoalteromonas agarivorans Grx (WP_004588615), Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis Grx (WP_016708488), Pseudoalteromonas undina Grx (WP_010391834), and Rheinheimera nanhaiensis Grx (WP_008217797). The shaded boxes in same color indicate identical residues. Symbols: closed triangles, cysteines (C) in the active site; pentagrams, residues involved in glutathione-binding site.
3.2. Expression and Purification of the PsGrx

The recombinant vector pETgrx was constructed and transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3). rPsGrx was overexpressed by IPTG induction, and SDS-PAGE results showed a strong band approximately 15.0 kDa was found compared to uninduced cells (Figure 2). The purification process resulted in a 5.81-fold purification with 43.83% final recovery and 53.25 U/mg specific activity.

246871.fig.002
Figure 2: SDS-PAGE of the expression and purification of PsGrx in E. coli. lane 1: IPTG-induced E. coli BL21 (Grx); lane 2: a total cell lysate of IPTG-induced E. coli BL21 (Grx+); lane 3: purified PsGrx; lane 4: molecular weight protein marker.
3.3. Biochemical Properties of rPsGrx

Effects of temperatures on the rPsGrx activity were measured in temperature range of 0°C–60°C (Figure 3(a)). The optimal temperature for rPsGrx activity was 30°C. rPsGrx showed about 47.2% and 25.5% of its activity at 10°C and 0°C, respectively. As for the thermal stability assay, rPsGrx was evaluated by incubation at temperature 40°C and 50°C for 40 min (Figure 3(b)). rPsGrx showed 65.0% of its activity after incubation at 40°C for 20 min while lost almost all the activity after incubation at 50°C for 30 min. Effect of pH on the Grx activity was studied using different pH buffers. As shown in Figure 3(c), rPsGrx showed activity in a broad pH range of 5.0–9.0. The maximal activity was observed at pH 8.0. But it was completely inactive in buffer pH 10.0.

fig3
Figure 3: Biochemical properties of the rPsGrx. (a) Effect of temperatures on activity of the rPsGrx. (b) Effect of temperatures on the stability of the rPsGrx. The protein was incubated at 40°C closed triangles and 50°C closed circles for 10, 20, 30, and 40 min, respectively and then directly put into an ice water bath and the residual activity was measured in the standard assay. (c). Effect of pH on activity of the rPsGrx.

Results regarding the effect of various compounds on the rPsGrx activity were shown in Table 1. Mg2+, Zn2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, and Ca2+ strongly inhibited the activity of rPsGrx by 93.0, 94.2, 85.0, 83.0, and 82.8%, respectively. Addition of other metals, such as K+, Fe2+, Fe3+, and Mn2+, partially inhibited Grx activity. The presence of thiourea, DDT, Tween-80, SDS, and H2O2 decreased the activity, and EDTA kept Grx activity with 79.7%. It should be noted that 37.0% of the remaining activity was detected in the presence of high salt concentrations (1 M NaCl). Based on the Lineweaver-Burk plot, the and values of rPsGrx using HED as substrate were 0.46 mM and 14.3 nmol/mL/min, respectively.

4. Discussion

Based on the phylogeny, sequence, and domain structure, Grxs have been discovered and identified in various species. In the present study, a novel Grx gene from P. sp. AN178 was cloned and expressed in E. coli. The 270bp PsGrx gene with 89 amino acid (9.8 kDa) was similar to some of the other Grx genes such as Chlorella virus Grx (9.0 kDa) [18], Trypanosoma cruzi Grx (12.4 kDa) [19], Taiwanofungus camphorata Grx (11.0 kDa) [20], and Panax ginseng Grx (11.2 kDa) [21]. While larger molecular weight determination results to that of tomato SlGrx1 (32.1 kDa) [22] and E. coli Grx2 (24.3 kDa) [23] have been reported, Grxs from different species may differ in their structures. Classical Grxs are 10 kDa proteins with a CPYC active site (Grx1 and Grx3 in E. coli and Grx1 and Grx2 in yeast). A second group with a CGFS active site corresponds to yeast Grx3, Grx4, and Grx5 [24]. The third type, represented by E. coli Grx2, is structurally related to the GST [25]. In this study, PsGrx contains the N-terminal redox center C12 PFC15 sequence, which is typically CXXC motif present in Grx. Two cysteines in this motif were the source of reducing equivalents for substrate reduction. These residues formed reversible disulfide bond during catalysis and were shown to be the enzyme active site [1]. In addition, PsGrx also contains conserved C-terminal sequences involved in GSH binding, which exhibited highest homology to other Grxs. Multiple sequence alignment of the full-length PsGrx revealed that it shared the highest homologies with P. haloplanktis belonging to the TRX-like superfamily (Figure 1).

The optimum temperature for the rPsGrx was observed at 30°C (Figure 3(a)). It was lower than the optimum temperature of Chlorella virus Grx (37°C) [17]. The previous studies have shown that Grxs are ubiquitous small heat-stable proteins. Trypanosoma cruzi Grx retained approximately 50% of activity at 100°C for 8.5 min [19]; Brassica campestris Grx has no loss of activity at 95°C for 30 min [26], and Cryptococcus neoformans Grx was partially inactivated at 60°C or higher temperatures [27]. But rPsGrx activity still showed 65.0% of its activity after incubation at 40°C for 20 min (Figure 3(b)), which displayed low thermal stability. It was known that the common features of the cold active enzyme are high catalytic activities at low temperatures and low thermal stability. These results indicated that rPsGrx was a cold active protein. As shown in Figure 3(c), optimum activity was observed at pH 8.0. This result was consistent with Grx from Brassica campestris (pH 8.5) [26], Grx from Oryza sativa (pH 8.7) [28].

As shown in Table 1, 37.0% of its optimum activity was detectable at 1.0 M NaCl. This observation was found in other cold active enzymes from Antarctic sea-ice bacteria, such as 110.5, 96.7, and 81.4% of the GST, protease and lipase activity detected in the presence of 1.0 M concentrations, respectively [13, 29, 30]. It was sensitive to SDS and thiourea, indicating that hydrogen bonds played an important role in maintaining Grx activity. rPsGrx was very sensitive to H2O2, and the similar result was described in the Grx from Oryza sativa [28], which could oxidize the reduced sulfhydryl groups. The values of rPsGrx (0.46 mM) were much lower than that of Chlorella virus Grx (1.4–2.1 mM) [4], human Grx2 (1.68 mM) [23], and Cryptococcus neoformans Grx (1.03 mM) [27], indicating rPsGrx had a higher affinity for the substrate HED.

In conclusion, compared with other Grxs, rPsGrx displayed specific catalytic properties and was a typical cold active protein with low thermal stability. Further studies are undergoing to understand the physiological function of Grx in Antarctic sea-ice bacteria under environmental stresses.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31100037), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2011CM003 and ZR2009DQ023), and Natural Scientific Research Innovation Foundation in Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT-NSRIF201011).

References

  1. A. Holmgren, “Thioredoxin and glutaredoxin systems,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 264, no. 24, pp. 13963–13966, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. C. Laurent, E. C. Moore, and P. Reichard, “Enzymatic synthesis of deoxyribonucleotides,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 239, pp. 3436–3444, 1964. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. Herrero, G. Bellí, and C. Casas, “Structural and functional diversity of glutaredoxins in yeast,” Current Protein and Peptide Science, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 659–668, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Zaffagnini, L. Michelet, V. Massot, P. Trost, and S. D. Lemaire, “Biochemical characterization of glutaredoxins from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii reveals the unique properties of a chloroplastic CGFS-type glutaredoxin,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 14, pp. 8868–8876, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Luo, Y. Jiang, X. Ma et al., “Structural and biochemical characterization of yeast monothiol glutaredoxin Grx6,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 398, no. 4, pp. 614–622, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Ströher and A. H. Millar, “The biological roles of glutaredoxins,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 446, no. 3, pp. 333–348, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. Rouhier, J. Couturier, and J. Jacquot, “Genome-wide analysis of plant glutaredoxin systems,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1685–1696, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. Herrero and M. A. de La Torre-Ruiz, “Monothiol glutaredoxins: a common domain for multiple functions,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 1518–1530, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. H. Lillig, C. Berndt, and A. Holmgren, “Glutaredoxin systems,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1780, no. 11, pp. 1304–1317, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. J. Russell, “Psychrophilic bacteria—molecular adaptations of membrane lipids,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 489–493, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. G. Gocheva, S. Tosi, E. T. Krumova et al., “Temperature downshift induces antioxidant response in fungi isolated from Antarctica,” Extremophiles, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 273–281, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. K. Chattopadhyay, G. Raghu, Y. V. R. K. Sharma, A. R. Biju, M. V. Rajasekharan, and S. Shivaji, “Increase in oxidative stress at low temperature in an antarctic bacterium,” Current Microbiology, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 544–546, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Cotugno, M. Rosaria Ruocco, S. Marco et al., “Differential cold-adaptation among protein components of the thioredoxin system in the psychrophilic eubacterium Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAC 125,” Molecular BioSystems, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 519–528, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. G. Gocheva, E. T. Krumova, L. S. Slokoska, J. G. Miteva, S. V. Vassilev, and M. B. Angelova, “Cell response of Antarctic and temperate strains of Penicillium spp. to different growth temperature,” Mycological Research, vol. 110, no. 11, pp. 1347–1354, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y. L. Shi, Q. F. Wang, Y. H. Hou et al., “Molecular cloning, expression and enzymatic characterization of glutathione S-transferase from Antarctic sea-ice bacteria Pseudoalteromonas sp. ANT506,” Microbiological Research, vol. 169, pp. 179–184, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. Y. Meyer, B. B. Buchanan, F. Vignols, and J. P. Reichheld, “Thioredoxins and glutaredoxins: unifying elements in redox biology,” Annual Review of Genetics, vol. 43, pp. 335–367, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Holmgren and F. Aslund, “Glutaredoxin.,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 252, pp. 283–292, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. A. Fitzgerald, Y. Zhang, G. Lewis, and J. L. van Etten, “Characterization of a monothiol glutaredoxin encoded by Chlorella virus PBCV-1,” Virus Genes, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 418–426, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. V. E. Marquez, D. G. Arias, C. V. Piattoni, C. Robello, A. A. Iglesias, and S. A. Guerrero, “Cloning, expression, and characterization of a dithiol glutaredoxin from trypanosoma cruzi,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 787–792, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. F. Ken, C. Y. Lin, Y. C. Jiang, L. Wen, and C. T. Lin, “Cloning, expression, and characterization of an enzyme possessing both glutaredoxin and dehydroascorbate reductase activity from Taiwanofungus camphorata,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 21, pp. 10357–10362, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y.-J. Kim, J.-S. Shim, P. R. Krishna et al., “Isolation and characterization of a glutaredoxin gene from Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer,” Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 335–349, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. X. Yang and K. Ma, “Characterization of a thioredoxin-thioredoxin reductase system from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga maritima,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 192, no. 5, pp. 1370–1376, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. V. N. Gladyshev, A. Liu, S. V. Novoselov et al., “Identification and characterization of a new mammalian glutaredoxin ( thioltransferase ), Grx2,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 32, pp. 30374–30380, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. T. Rodríguez-Manzaneque, J. Ros, E. Cabiscol, A. Sorribas, and E. Herrero, “Grx5 glutaredoxin plays a central role in protection against protein oxidative damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 8180–8190, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. B. Xia, A. Vlamis-Gardikas, A. Holmgren, P. E. Wright, and H. J. Dyson, “Solution structure of Escherichia coli glutaredoxin-2 shows similarity to mammalian glutathione-S-transferases,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 310, no. 4, pp. 907–918, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Y. Cho, E. Park, and C. Lim, “Thioltransferase (glutaredoxin) from Chinese cabbage: purification and properties,” Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 377–383, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Sa, K. Kim, and C. Lim, “Purification and Characterization of Glutaredoxin from Cryptococcus neoformans,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 655–660, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. Sha, K. Minakuchi, N. Higaki et al., “Purification and characterization of glutaredoxin (thioltransferase) from rice (Oryza sativa L.),” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 842–848, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. Q. Wang, Y. Hou, Z. Xu, J. Miao, and G. Li, “Purification and properties of an extracellular cold-active protease from the psychrophilic bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. NJ276,” Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 362–368, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Q. Wang, Y. Hou, Y. Ding, and P. Yan, “Purification and biochemical characterization of a cold-active lipase from Antarctic sea ice bacteria Pseudoalteromonas sp. NJ 70,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 9233–9238, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus