A Novel Potentiometric Sensor for Determination of Neurotoxin β-N-Oxalyl-L-α, β-Diaminopropionic Acid

Isildak, Omer; Saymaz, Furkan; Karadag, Ahmet; Korkmaz, Nesrin Okumus; Attar, Azade

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/251653

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results and Discussion Conclusion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Environmental Toxicology in Addressing Public Health Challenges in East Asia

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 251653 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/251653

A Novel Potentiometric Sensor for Determination of Neurotoxin β-N-Oxalyl-L-α, β-Diaminopropionic Acid

Omer Isildak,¹Furkan Saymaz,¹Ahmet Karadag,¹Nesrin Okumus Korkmaz,¹and Azade Attar²

Academic Editor: Jochen Bundschuh

Received27 Feb 2014

Revised17 Apr 2014

Accepted01 May 2014

Published20 May 2014

Abstract

A novel potentiometric sensor based on ionophore (Cd(NH₂CH₂CH₂OCH₂CH₂OCH₂CH₂NH₂)Ag₃(CN)₅) for the determination of β-N-oxalyl-L-α, β-diaminopropionic acid (ODAP) is developed. The ODAP-selective membrane sensor demonstrates high sensitivity and short response time. The detection limit of the ODAP-selective membrane sensor is about mol and the response time is shorter than 6 s. The linear dynamic range of the ODAP-selective membrane sensor is between ODAP concentrations of and mol . The ODAP-selective membrane sensor exhibits good operational stability for at least one week in dry conditions at 4–6°C. It has a reproducible and stable response during continuous work for at least 10 h with a relative standard deviation of 0.28% ( = 18).

1. Introduction

Neurolathyrism is caused by a neuroexcitatory nonprotein amino acid, β-N-oxalyl-L-α, β-diaminopropionic acid (ODAP) [1–3]. This disease is characterized by a spastic paraplegia whose sporadic outbreaks have occurred at times due to the excessive consumption of the pulse Lathyrus sativus (grass pea, khesari dal, guaya, and chickling pea) especially under famine conditions in certain parts of Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Spain, Russia, and India [4–6]. The major toxic component of the pulse is ODAP, a neurotoxin amino acid [3, 4], which can potentially act as an agonist at certain glutamate receptors and [7, 8] inhibit specifically tyrosine aminotransferase [9] and chelates metals like zinc [10] that is also present in the longevity promoting Ginseng root [11]. However, the cultivation of the Lathyrus sativus, which contains high amount of ODAP, has been continuing in several parts of the world, and large populations still consume it in their daily diet [4]. Even under severe drought conditions when Lathyrus sativus has been consumed as the sole dietary source, the disease affects only less than 5% of the individuals and more than 95% always escape from any ill effects of the pulse [4, 12].

Recently, a few HPLC methods for detection of ODAP have been developed [1, 13–16]. Intensive research for developing low- or zero-neurotoxin ODAP of Lathyrus sativus seeds is continuing in several institutes focusing on agricultural reserves [13]. The most obvious option to achieve this goal entails plant breeding and postharvest analysing. This involves processing of a large number of samples, requiring a fast and selective method for monitoring ODAP.

9-Fluorenylmethyl chloroformate (FMOC) derivatization can be used for the detection and quantitative estimation of amounts of ODAP [17]. Euerby et al. separated the D and L isomers of ODAP with o-phthaldialdehyde chiral thiols by reversed-phase chromatography, using fluorescence detection, but the procedures are time consuming [18]. Khan et al. used precolumn derivatization with phenyl isothiocyanate (PITC) [19, 20]. The most common method utilizes the reaction of o-phthalaldehyde (OPA) with 2,3-diaminopropionic acid (DAP) formed on hydrolysis of both α- and β-isomers of ODAP, and the derivative is detected at 420 nm [1, 17]. However, the method cannot differentiate α- and β-ODAP and both are detected.

To the best of our knowledge, as alternatives to the present methods for ODAP determination, no previous work has been reported on the potentiometric ODAP-selective membrane sensor to date. Therefore, the present study reports the development of a potentiometric ODAP-selective membrane sensor based on the ionophore (cadmium(2-[2-(2-aminoethoxy)ethoxy]ethan-1-amine) pentacyano trisilver) which is shown in Figure 1. The main analytical characteristics of the sensor, such as pH behavior and the amount of the ionophore, were investigated with respect to the influence on sensitivity, selectivity, limit of detection, dynamic range, response time, operation, and storage stability.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Materials

All of the reagents used were analytical reagent grade and double distilled deionized water was used throughout. The α-ODAP and β-ODAP mixture was purified from Lathyrus sativus extracts as described previously [21] and used throughout the study as mixture. High molecular mass poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), o-nitrophenyloctylether (o-NPOE), potassium tetrakis (p-chlorophenyl) borate (KTpClPB), tetrahydrofuran (THF), and graphite were obtained from Fluka. Epoxy resin (Macroplast Su 2227) and hardener (Desmodur RFE) were obtained from Henkel and Bayer, respectively. Di-cyclo-hexyl 18-crown-6-NaI salt was synthesized according to Pedersen’s method [22]. ODAP-selective ionophore [Cd(NH₂CH₂CH₂OCH₂CH₂OCH₂CH₂NH₂)Ag₃(CN)₅] was synthesized in the laboratory [23]. Deionized water was obtained by means of a DI 800 Model deionized water system.

A stock ODAP solution (1.0 × 10⁻²mol L⁻¹) was prepared in distilled deionized water. The diluted solutions (1.0 × 10⁻² to 1.0 × 10⁻⁶mol L⁻¹) of ODAP were prepared by an appropriate dilution of the stock solution. All of the other reagents used were of analytical reagent grade. Twice-distilled deionized water was used throughout the study.

2.2. Synthesis of Ionophore

1 mmol of AgNO₃ and 2 mmol of KCN are dissolved in distilled water-alcohol mixture resulting formation of dicyanosilver anion. 1 mmol of CdSO₄8/3H₂O is added to this solution result a blurry solution and this solution was stirred and heated on a magnetic stirrer. And 2-[2-(2-aminoethoxy)ethoxy]ethan-1-amine alternatively named 2,2′-(ethylenedioxy)bis (ethylamine), H₂N(CH₂)₂O(CH₂)₂O(CH₂)₂NH₂ is added to this solution. Ethanol is added to this mixture and stirred at 60°C for 1 hour. The resulting mixture is filtered and the remaining solution is left at room temperature for crystal formation.

2.3. Apparatus

Potentiometric measurements were conducted at room temperature (20 ± 1°C) by using a multichannel potentiometric system (provided by Isedo medical instruments, Turkey) controlled by a computer and a homemade C-sharp programme was used. The potential values as steady-state responses of the ODAP-selective membrane sensor were performed for different concentrations of standard solutions of ODAP, respectively. Throughout the measurements, a microsized solid silver/silver chloride electrode (provided by Isedo medical instruments, Turkey) was used as reference electrode with the ODAP-selective membrane sensor. To investigate the potentiometric characteristics of the prepared ODAP-selective membrane sensor, measurements of the potential differences between two points which are the cause of electrical currents were taken in the following cell assembly: microsized solid silver/silver chloride reference electrode/test solution/ODAP-selective membrane sensor membrane/all solid-state contact material/Cu wire.

2.4. Design of All Solid-State Contact ODAP-Selective Membrane Sensor

The potentiometric all solid-state contact ODAP-selective membrane sensor was prepared as previously described in the literature [24]. The epoxy resin mixture used to bind the graphite in preparing the all solid-state contact of the sensor was made from epoxy and hardener in THF solvent in the proportions 1.0 : 0.5 w/w. The powdered graphite was mixed with the epoxy resin mixture in the proportions 1.0 : 1.0 w/w. After mixing, the solution was allowed to stand for 20–30 min in air. When the appropriate viscosity was attained, a shielded copper wire was dipped in the mixture several times to obtain solid-state contact uniformly coated and allowed to stand overnight in an oven at 40°C.

The ODAP-selective membrane solution which comprised ODAP ionophore (2.5%, w/w), di-cyclo-hexyl 18-crown-6-NaI (1.5%, w/w), o-NPOE (65.0%, w/w), KTpClPB (0.5%, w/w), and PVC (30.5%, w/w) was dissolved in 4 mL of THF. Di-cyclo-hexyl 18-crown-6-NaI salt was used within the membrane content to increase the ionic mobility of the membrane toward ODAP [25].

The solid-state contact was dipped into the ODAP-selective membrane solution at least three times and then the coated membrane was allowed to dry in the air for at least 3 hours. Finally, the prepared all solid-state contact ODAP-selective membrane sensor was soaked in a 0.01 M ODAP solution for at least 3 hours before use. The potentiometric performance characteristics of the all solid-state contact ODAP-selective membrane sensor were tested in steady-state conditions.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Potentiometric Performance of the All Solid-State Contact ODAP-Selective Membrane Sensor

As can be seen from results presented in Table 1, the all solid-state contact ODAP-selective membrane sensor based on (Cd(NH₂CH₂CH₂OCH₂CH₂OCH₂CH₂NH₂)Ag₃(CN)₅) (2.5%, w/w), di-cyclo-hexyl 18-crown-6-NaI (1.5%, w/w), together with other constituents, demonstrates very good selectivity towards ODAP over other ions tested. The potentiometric selectivity coefficients of all solid-state ODAP-selective membrane sensors were evaluated by the separate solutions method according to the IUPAC recommendation [26].

Potentiometric performance of the ODAP-selective membrane sensor was evaluated to optimize membrane composition. The potentiometric results obtained by evaluated ODAP-selective membrane compositions are summarized in Table 1. The performance of the potentiometric sensor, in terms of sensitivity and long-term stability, is strictly dependent on the amount of the ODAP-selective ionophore in membrane content. For the optimization of the amount of the ionophore in the membrane, different ionophore concentrations in the membrane solution were prepared. The highest sensitivity of potentiometric ODAP-sensor was observed when 2.5% (w/w) ionophore was loaded. The further increase in the amount of ionophore loading might lead to increase of the diffusion resistance for the ODAP to arrive to the electrode surface and then to the decrease in the sensor response. On the other hand, if the ionophore concentrations are lower than 1.0% (w/w), there is no enough ionophore involved in the reaction which leads only to a slight potential variation. As a result, the ionophore ratio of 2.5% (w/w) was used to obtain optimum membrane composition for further experiments.

Since ionophore activity is strongly affected by the pH of the solution, the effect of pH on the potentiometric ODAP-selective membrane sensor response was examined by using phosphate buffer systems (5 mM) at pH 5.00 and 9.00. At these pH solutions, the ODAP-selective membrane sensor exhibited almost no potential change in concentration range of 1.0 × 10⁻² to 1.0 × 10⁻⁶mol L⁻¹ of ODAP, respectively (Figure 2). From the obtained results we decided to use the potentiometric ODAP-selective membrane sensor at pH 7. Consequently neutral medium was prepared as much as possible as optimum working conditions for further experiments.

3.2. Analytical Characteristics of the All Solid-State Contact ODAP-Selective Membrane Sensor

Using the optimum conditions determined in the above studies, calibration curve of the ODAP-selective membrane sensor was obtained over an ODAP concentration range of 1.0 × 10⁻² to 1.0 × 10⁻⁶mol L⁻¹. As shown in Figure 3, the ODAP-selective membrane sensor exhibited a linear response, and the graph of the linear response was defined by the equation of with a correlation coefficient = 0.9981. The limit of detection for ODAP-selective membrane sensor calculated was about 1.2 × 10⁻⁶mol L⁻¹.

The response of the ODAP-selective membrane sensor was highly reproducible as shown in Figure 4. The novel ODAP-selective membrane sensor also exhibited good operational and storage stability. The potentiometric values obtained over an interval time of 15 minute showed that the ODAP-selective membrane sensor responses were reproducible and stable during continuous work at least for 10 h. Continuous and brakeless measurements could be done during this 10-hour period.

The relative standard deviation of ODAP-selective membrane sensor responses was approximately 0.28% () for ODAP concentration of 1.0 × 10⁻³mol L⁻¹. An investigation about long-term storage stability of ODAP-selective membrane sensor, kept in dry at 4–6°C, the calibration curve was recorded every day and the potentials were measured. The sensor demonstrated good storage stability for at least one week to standard ODAP concentration change. However, after one week there was a decrease of 20% from the initial potential. After 2 weeks, the decrease of the biosensor response was lower than 70% of its original response. These results indicate a less operational and storage stability of the ODAP-selective membrane sensor than those of potentiometric sensors in the studies [27–29]. The ODAP-selective membrane sensor reached a steady-state rapidly (Table 1), and its detection limit was 1.15 × 10⁻⁶mol L⁻¹ which is better than those in the literature [28, 30], as the lowest limit in the linear range was 8.0 × 10⁻⁶mol L⁻¹. The ODAP-selective membrane sensor presented in this work also exhibited a short response time less than 6 s better than those in the studies [28, 31], wider working concentration ranges 1.0 × 10⁻¹ to 8.0 × 10⁻⁶mol L⁻¹, and unfortunately short life span when compared to those of the sensors in other studies [29, 32, 33].

4. Conclusion

A novel all solid-state contact potentiometric ODAP-selective membrane sensor for the determination of ODAP is developed. All solid-state ODAP-selective membrane sensor presented here is cheap and easy to fabricate. Moreover, the sensor has a high sensitivity, short response time, wider linear range, and good operational stability but has worse long-term stability. The developed ODAP-selective membrane sensor could be a useful alternative for ODAP determination in real samples. Therefore, our studies will continue using developed potentiometric ODAP-selective membrane sensor for detection of ODAP in Lathyrus sativus and other real samples.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Scientific Research Commission of Gaziosmanpaşa University, Project no. 2011/111. Also, the complex used as ionophore was synthesized in the TUBİTAK Project (The Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey, Grant KBAG-112T696).

References

F. Wang, X. Chen, Q. Chen, X. Qin, and Z. Li, “Determination of neurotoxin 3-N-oxalyl-2,3-diaminopropionic acid and non-protein amino acids in Lathyrus sativus by precolumn derivatization with 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 883, no. 1-2, pp. 113–118, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Ressler, “Isolation and identification from common vetch of the neurotoxin β-cyano-l-alanine, a possible factor in neurolathyrism,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 237, pp. 733–735, 1962.
View at: Google Scholar
S. L. N. Rao, P. R. Adiga, and P. S. Sarma, “The isolation and characterization of β-N-oxalyl-l-α,β-diaminopropionic acid: a neurotoxin from the seeds of Lathyrus sativus,” Biochemistry, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 432–436, 1964.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. P. Rudra, M. R. Singh, M. A. Junaid, P. Jyothi, and S. L. N. Rao, “Metabolism of dietary ODAP in humans may be responsible for the low incidence of neurolathyrism,” Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 318–322, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Dwivedi, “The grass pea, treat and promise,” in Proceedings of the International Network for the Improvement of Lathyrus sativus and the Eradication of Lathyrism, pp. 1–26, Third World Medical Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
R. T. Haimanot, Y. Kidane, E. Wuhib et al., “Lathyrism in rural northwestern Ethiopia: a highly prevalent neurotoxic disorder,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 664–672, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
S. M. Ross, D. N. Roy, and P. S. Spencer, “β-N-oxalylamino-l-alanine action on glutamate receptors,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 710–715, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Pearson and P. B. Nunn, “The neurolathyrogen, β-N-oxalyl-l-α,β-diaminopropionic acid, is a potent agonist at glutamate preferring receptors in the frog spinal cord,” Brain Research, vol. 206, no. 1, pp. 178–182, 1981.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. S. Vardhan, M. P. P. Rudra, and S. L. N. Rao, “Inhibition of tyrosine aminotransferase by β-N-oxalyl-l-α, β-diaminopropionic acid, the Lathyrus sativus neurotoxin,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 2477–2484, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Lambein, R. Haque, J. K. Khan, N. Kebede, and Y.-H. Kuo, “From soil to brain: zinc deficiency increases the neurotoxicity of Lathyrus sativus and may affect the susceptibility for the motorneurone disease neurolathyrism,” Toxicon, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 461–466, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-H. Kuo, F. Ikegami, and F. Lambein, “Neuroactive and other free amino acids in seed and young plants of Panax ginseng,” Phytochemistry, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 1087–1091, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Getahun, F. Lambein, M. Vanhoorne, and P. van der Stuyft, “Pattern and associated factors of the neurolathyrism epidemic in Ethiopia,” The Lancet, vol. 354, pp. 306–307, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Zhao, X. Chen, Z. Hu, Q. Li, Q. Chen, and Z. Li, “Analysis of β-N-oxalyl-l-α,β-diaminopropionic acid and homoarginine in Lathyrus sativus by capillary zone electrophoresis,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 857, no. 1-2, pp. 295–302, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yigzaw, N. Larsson, L. Gorton, T. Ruzgas, and T. Solomon, “Liquid chromatographic determination of total and β-N-oxalyl-l-α,β-diaminopropionic acid in Lathyrus sativus seeds using both refractive index and bioelectrochemical detection,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 929, no. 1-2, pp. 13–21, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Thippeswamy, A. Martin, and L. R. Gowda, “A reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography method for analyzing of neurotoxin β-N-oxalyl-l-α,β-diaminopropanoic acid in legume seeds,” Food Chemistry, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 1290–1295, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z.-Y. Yan, P. S. Spencer, Z. Li et al., “Lathyrus sativus (grass pea) and its neurotoxin ODAP,” Phytochemistry, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 107–121, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. N. Rao, “A sensitive and specific colorimetric method for the determination of α,β-diaminopropionic acid and the Lathyrus sativus neurotoxin,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 14, article 387, 1978.
View at: Google Scholar
M. R. Euerby, P. B. Nunn, and L. Z. Partridge, “Resolution of neuroexcitatory non-protein amino acid enantiomers by high-performance liquid chromatography utilising pre-column derivatisation with o-phthaldialdehyde chiral thiols: applications to ω-N-oxalyl diamino acids,” Journal of Chromatography, vol. 466, pp. 407–414, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
J. K. Khan, N. Kebede, Y. H. Kuo, F. Lambein, and A. de Bruyn, “Analysis of the neurotoxin β-ODAP and its α-isomer by precolumn derivatization with phenylisothiocyanate,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 208, no. 2, pp. 237–240, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. K. Khan, Y.-H. Kuo, N. Kebede, and F. Lambein, “Determination of non-protein amino acids and toxins in Lathyrus by high-performance liquid chromatography with precolumn phenyl isothiocyanate derivatization,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 687, no. 1, pp. 113–119, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. L. Harrison, P. B. Nunn, and R. R. Hill, “Synthesis of α- and β-N-oxalyl-l-α,β-diaminopropionic acids and their isolation from seeds of Lathyrus sativus,” Phytochemistry, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1211–1215, 1977.
View at: Google Scholar
C. J. Pedersen, “Cyclic polyethers and their complexes with metal salts,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 89, no. 26, pp. 7017–7036, 1967.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Karadağ, N. Korkmaz, and Ş. Tekin, “Novel cyano-bridged heteronuclear coordination complexes and their use as pharmaceutical agents,” Data of Actual Completion of the Search no. 2012/08885, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
O. Cubuk, M. Altikatoglu, V. Erci, I. Isildak, and N. Tinkilic, “An all solid-state creatinine biosensor based on ammonium-selective PVC-NH₂ membrane electrode,” Sensor Letters, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 585–590, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Isildak, M. Yolcu, O. Isildak, N. Demirel, G. Topal, and H. Hosgoren, “All-solid-state PVC membrane Ag⁺-selective electrodes based on diaza-18-crown-6 compounds,” Microchimica Acta, vol. 144, no. 1–3, pp. 177–181, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Umezawa, P. Buhlmann, K. Umezawa, K. Tohda, and S. Amemiya, “Potentiometric selectivity coefficients of ion-selective electrodes,” Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 1851–2082, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
P. C. Pandey and A. P. Mishra, “Novel potentiometric sensing of creatinine,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 99, no. 2-3, pp. 230–235, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. H. Chou, J. C. Chou, T. P. Sun, and S. K. Hsiung, “All solid-state potentiometric biosensors for creatinine determination based on pH and ammonium electrodes,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 665–672, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ramanavicius, “Amperometric biosensor for the determination of creatine,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 387, no. 5, pp. 1899–1906, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Radomska, E. Bodenszac, S. Głab, and R. Koncki, “Creatinine biosensor based on ammonium ion selective electrode and its application in flow-injection analysis,” Talanta, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 603–608, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-J. Huang, J.-L. Lin, P.-H. Chen, M.-J. Syu, and G.-B. Lee, “A multi-functional electrochemical sensing system using microfluidic technology for the detection of urea and creatinine,” Electrophoresis, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 931–938, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Weber and A. P. van Zanten, “Interferences in current methods for measurements of creatinine,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 695–700, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Ramanavicius, “Amperometric biosensor for the determination of creatine,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 387, no. 5, pp. 1899–1906, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Omer Isildak et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1492

Downloads

957

Citations