Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 265658, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/265658
Clinical Study

Effects of Converting Tacrolimus Formulation from Twice-Daily to Once-Daily in Liver Transplantation Recipients

1Department of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang-Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
2Department of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Chang-Gung Transplantation Institute, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, 5 Fu-Hsing Street, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan, Taiwan

Received 10 March 2014; Accepted 3 June 2014; Published 14 July 2014

Academic Editor: Jaime Aranda-Michel

Copyright © 2014 Ashok Thorat et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. H. Wiesner and K. V. Narayanan Menon, “Late hepatic allograft dysfunction,” Liver Transplantation, vol. 7, pp. S60–S73, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. Burra, G. Germani, F. Gnoato et al., “Adherence in liver transplant recipients,” Liver Transplantation, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 760–770, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. Y. Calne, S. Thiru, D. J. G. White et al., “Cyclosporin A in patients receiving renal allografts from cadaver donors,” Lancet, vol. 2, no. 8104, pp. 1323–1327, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Encke, W. Uhl, W. Stremmel, and P. Sauer, “Immunosuppression and modulation in liver transplantation,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 19, supplement 4, pp. iv22–iv25, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. D. Kahan, “Forty years of publication of transplantation proceedings–the second decade: the cyclosporine revolution,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1423–1437, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. E. Starzl, J. Fung, R. Venkataramman, S. Todo, A. J. Demetris, and A. Jain, “FK 506 for liver, kidney, and pancreas transplantation,” Lancet, vol. 2, no. 8670, pp. 1000–1004, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. W. Busuttil and J. R. Lake, “Role of tacrolimus in the evolution of liver transplantation,” Transplantation, vol. 77, pp. S44–S51, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. L. Weng, A. K. Israni, M. M. Joffe et al., “Race and electronically measured adherence to immunosuppressive medications after deceased donor renal transplantation,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1839–1848, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. E. O’Carroll, L. M. McGredor, V. Swanson, G. Masterton, and P. C. Hayes, “Adherence to medication after liver transplantation in Scotland: a pilot study,” Liver Transplantation, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1862–1868, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Laederach-Hofmann and B. Bunzel, “Noncompliance in organ transplant recipients: a literature review,” General Hospital Psychiatry, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 412–424, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. J. Scott, K. McKeage, S. J. Keam, and G. L. Plosker, “Tacrolimus: a further update of its use in the management of organ transplantation,” Drugs, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 1247–1297, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. A. Barraclough, N. M. Isbel, D. W. Johnson, S. B. Campbell, and C. E. Staatz, “Once-versus twice-daily tacrolimus: are the formulations truly equivalent?” Drugs, vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 1561–1577, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. A. Cross and C. M. Perry, “Tacrolimus once-daily formulation: in the prophylaxis of transplant rejection in renal or liver allograft recipients,” Drugs, vol. 67, no. 13, pp. 1931–1943, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. Comuzzi, D. Lorenzin, A. Rossetto et al., “Safety of conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf) to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf) in stable liver transplant recipients,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1320–1321, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Perrakis, K. Schwarz, S. Yedibela, R. S. Croner, W. Hohenberger, and V. Mller, “Impact of the conversion of the immunosuppressive regimen from Prograf to Advagraf or to Sirolimus in long-term stable liver transplant recipients: Indications, safety, and outcome,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 3702–3707, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Meçule, L. Poli, I. Nofroni et al., “Once daily tacrolimus formulation: monitoring of plasma levels, graft function, and cardiovascular risk factors,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1317–1319, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. R. First, “First clinical experience with the new once-daily formulation of tacrolimus,” Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 159–166, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Kasahara, T. Kiuchi, K. Takakura et al., “Postoperative flow cytometry crossmatch in living donor liver transplantation: clinical significance of humoral immunity in acute rejection,” Transplantation, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 568–575, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. J. Wu, C. Y. Cheng, C. H. Chen et al., “Lower variability of tacrolimus trough concentration after conversion from prograf to advagraf in stable kidney transplant recipients,” Transplantation, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 648–652, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Crespo, M. Mir, M. Marin et al., “novo kidney transplant recipients need higher doses of Advagraf compared with Prograf to get therapeutic levels,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 2115–2117, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus