Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 270137, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/270137
Clinical Study

Clinical Outcome and Wound Healing following Carpal Tunnel Decompression: A Comparison of Two Common Suture Materials

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Macclesfield District General Hospital, East Cheshire NHS Trust, Victoria Road, Macclesfield SK10 3BL, UK

Received 28 February 2014; Accepted 17 June 2014; Published 7 August 2014

Academic Editor: Francesco Doglietto

Copyright © 2014 Robert J. MacFarlane et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. Atroshi, C. Gummesson, R. Johnsson, E. Ornstein, J. Ranstam, and I. Rosén, “Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 282, no. 2, pp. 153–158, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. S. Prime, J. Palmer, W. S. Khan, and N. J. Goddard, “Is there light at the end of the tunnel? Controversies in the diagnosis and management of carpal tunnel syndrome,” Hand, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 354–360, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. C. Amadio, “The first carpal tunnel release?” Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 40–41, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Thurston and N. Lam, “Results of open carpal tunnel release: a comprehensive, retrospective study of 188 hands,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 283–288, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. I. Okutsu, S. Ninomiya, Y. Takatori, and Y. Ugawa, “Endoscopic management of carpal tunnel syndrome,” Arthroscopy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. I. Atroshi, G. Larsson, E. Ornstein, M. Hofer, R. Johnsson, and J. Ranstam, “Outcomes of endoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome among employed patients: randomised controlled trial,” The British Medical Journal, vol. 332, no. 7556, pp. 1473–1476, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. F. Jimenez, S. R. Gibbs, and A. T. Clapper, “Endoscopic treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a critical review,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 817–826, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. J. Scholten, A. Mink van der Molen, B. M. Uitdehaag, L. M. Bouter, and H. C. de Vet, “Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, Article ID CD003905, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. B. Niessen, P. H. M. Spauwen, and M. Kon, “The role of suture material in hypertrophic scar formation: monocryl vs. vicryl-rapide,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 254–260, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. M. Anderson, A. Rodriguez, and D. T. Chang, “Foreign body reaction to biomaterials,” Seminars in Immunology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 86–100, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. W. Postlethwait, D. A. Willigan, and A. W. Ulin, “Human tissue reaction to sutures,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 181, no. 2, pp. 144–150, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. Erel, P. I. Pleasance, O. Ahmed, and N. B. Hart, “Absorbable versus non-absorbable suture in carpal tunnel decompression,” Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 157–158, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. Kharwadkar, S. Naique, and P. J. A. Molitor, “Prospective randomized trial comparing absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in open carpal tunnel release,” Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 92–95, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. Theopold, S. Potter, M. Dempsey, and M. O'Shaughnessy, “A randomised controlled trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after open carpal tunnel release,” Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 350–353, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  15. T. Menovsky, R. H. M. A. Bartels, E. L. van Lindert, and J. A. Grotenhuis, “Skin closure in carpal tunnel surgery: a prospective comparative study between nylon, polyglactin 910 and stainless steel sutures,” Hand Surgery, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 35–38, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. V. Quinn, “Clinical wound evaluation,” Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 298–299, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. J. Jeray, “Acute midshaft clavicular fracture,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 239–248, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. B. Guyuron and C. Vaughan, “A comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable suture materials for skin repair,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 234–236, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Howard, A. J. M. Simison, A. Morris, and V. Bhalaik, “A prospective randomised trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for wound closure after fasciectomy for Dupuytren's contracture,” Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 618–620, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus