Clinical Study
Clinical Outcome and Wound Healing following Carpal Tunnel Decompression: A Comparison of Two Common Suture Materials
Table 3
Summary of literature relating to suture materials in carpal tunnel surgery.
| Author | Number of patients | Materials | Outcome |
| Present study (2013) | 53 | Vicryl Rapide and Prolene | No difference at 2 or 6 weeks comparing VAS, QuickDASH, or Southampton wound score |
| Erel et al. (2001) [12] | 64 | Vicryl and Prolene | Significantly greater VAS pain scores at 10 days in Vicryl but no difference at 6 weeks including wound healing and complication rates |
| Theopold et al. (2012) [14] | 47 | Vicryl Rapide and Novafil | No difference in POSAS and numeric scores assessing wound appearance, pain, or satisfaction at 2 and 6 weeks after procedure |
| Menovsky et al. (2004) [15] | 61 | Nylon, Vicryl (subcuticular), and stainless steel | No differences in pain scores at 2 and 6 weeks. Increased number of complications with Vicryl |
|
|