BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

BIODESERT: Exploring and Exploiting the Microbial Resource of Hot and Cold Deserts

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 296472 | 9 pages |

Pentachlorophenol Degradation by Janibacter sp., a New Actinobacterium Isolated from Saline Sediment of Arid Land

Academic Editor: George Tsiamis
Received01 May 2014
Accepted17 Aug 2014
Published17 Sep 2014


Many pentachlorophenol- (PCP-) contaminated environments are characterized by low or elevated temperatures, acidic or alkaline pH, and high salt concentrations. PCP-degrading microorganisms, adapted to grow and prosper in these environments, play an important role in the biological treatment of polluted extreme habitats. A PCP-degrading bacterium was isolated and characterized from arid and saline soil in southern Tunisia and was enriched in mineral salts medium supplemented with PCP as source of carbon and energy. Based on 16S rRNA coding gene sequence analysis, the strain FAS23 was identified as Janibacter sp. As revealed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis, FAS23 strain was found to be efficient for PCP removal in the presence of 1% of glucose. The conditions of growth and PCP removal by FAS23 strain were found to be optimal in neutral pH and at a temperature of 30°C. Moreover, this strain was found to be halotolerant at a range of 1–10% of NaCl and able to degrade PCP at a concentration up to 300 mg/L, while the addition of nonionic surfactant (Tween 80) enhanced the PCP removal capacity.

1. Introduction

The polyorganochlorophenolic (POP) compounds have been extensively used as wide spectrum biocides in industry and agriculture [1]. The toxicity of these compounds tends to increase according to their degree of chlorination [2]. Among chlorinated phenols, pentachlorophenol (PCP) has been widely used as wood and leather preservative, owing to its toxicity toward bacteria, mould, algae, and fungi [3]. However, PCP is also toxic to all forms of life since it is an inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation [4]. The extensive exposure to PCP could cause cancer, acute pancreatitis, immunodeficiency, and neurological disorders [5]. Consequently, this compound is listed among the priority pollutants of the US Environmental Protection Agency [6]. Moreover, it is recalcitrant to degradation because of its stable aromatic ring and high chloride contents, thus persisting in the environment [7]. Although contamination of soils and waters with chemically synthesized PCP is a serious environmental problem, their remediation may be possible using physical, chemical, and biological methods [8]. Bioremediation represents a choice process, thanks to its low costs and reduction of toxic residue generated in the environment. The biodegradation of PCP has been studied in both aerobic and anaerobic systems. Aerobic degradation of PCP especially has been extensively studied and several bacterial isolates were found to degrade and use PCP as a sole source of carbon and energy. The most studied aerobic PCP-degrading microorganisms included Mycobacterium chlorophenolicum [9], Alcaligenes sp. [10], Rhodococcus chlorophenolicus [11], Flavobacterium [12], Novosphingobium lentum [13] and Sphingomonas chlorophenolica [14], Bacillus [15], Pseudomonas [16], and Acinetobacter [17], as well as some fungi species. Saline and arid environments are found in a wide variety of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. A low taxonomic biodiversity is observed in all these saline environments [18], most probably due to the high salt concentrations prevailing in these environments. Moreover, the biodegradation process is difficult to perform under saline conditions [19]. Besides these metabolical and physiological features, halophilic and halotolerant microorganisms are known to play important roles in transforming and degrading waste and organic pollutants in saline and arid environment [20]. These microorganisms, particularly actinobacteria, are frequently isolated from extreme environments such as Sabkha, Chott, and Sahara which are known to have a great metabolic diversity and biotechnological potential. The occurrence of actinobacteria in saline environment and their tolerance to high salt concentrations were thus described [21]. However, few actinobacteria genera, such as Arthrobacter [22] and Kocuria [23], were reported for PCP-degradation process. The genus Janibacter which is recognized by Martin et al. [24] belongs to the family Intrasporangiaceae in the Actinomycetales order and included five major species, J. limosus [24], J. terrae [25], J. melonis [26], J. corallicola [27], and J. anophelis [28]. Interestingly, most of these species were reported for their ability to degrade a large spectrum of aromatic and/or chlorinated compounds including polychlorinated biphenyls [29], monochlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin [30], dibenzofuran [31], anthracene, phenanthrene [32], dibenzo-p-dioxin, carbazole, diphenyl ether, fluorene [33], and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [34]. However, no data reporting PCP degradation by Janibacter members was described. PCP and other POP compounds shared many physical properties, which limited biodegradation processes, and one of these properties was their lower solubility and therefore low bioavailability to the degrading bacteria. Nevertheless, the use of surfactants such as Tween 80 has the potential to increase the biodegradation rates of hydrophobic organic compounds by increasing the total aqueous solubility of these pesticides [35]. In this study, we evaluated for the first time the PCP removal potential, under different physicochemical conditions, by Janibacter sp., a halotolerant actinobacterium member isolated from arid and saline land in southern Tunisia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Solvents

PCP (MW 266.34 and >99% purity) and acetonitrile (HPLC grade) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (USA). All other inorganic chemicals used to prepare the different media are commercially available with highest purity and are used without further purification.

2.2. Sample Collection and PCP-Degrading Bacterium Isolation

The sediment samples were collected in March 2011 from arid and saline ecosystems belonging to the site “Sebkha El Naouel” with GPS coordinates: N 34°26′951′′ E 09°54′102′′ altitude 150 ft/46 m, in southern Tunisia. Bacterial isolation was performed as described by Rösch et al. [36] with some modifications: 10 g of soil sample was suspended in 100 mL of phosphate-buffered salt solution (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, and 2 mM KH2PO4) and stirred vigorously for 30 min. The soil suspension was diluted and 0.1 mL sample was spread on the surface of yeast extract-mannitol medium (YEM). YEM medium contained the following components at the specified concentrations (in g/L): mannitol, 5; yeast extract, 0.5; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.2; NaCl, 0.1; K2HPO4, 0.5; Na gluconate, 5; agar, 15; pH = 6, 8. After sterilization for 20 min at 120°C, 1 mL of 16.6% CaCl2 solution was added to 1 liter of YEM medium (1 : 1000). The plates were then incubated at 30°C for 7 days. Pure cultures of the isolates were obtained by streaking a single colony on the same medium.

2.3. 16S rRNA Gene Amplification and Sequence Analysis

For DNA extraction, the FAS23 strain was grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB) containing (in g/L) casein peptone, 17; soya peptone, 3; glucose, 2.5; sodium chloride, 5; dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, 4. DNA extraction was performed using CTAB/NaCl method as described by Wilson [37] and modified by using lysozyme (1 mg/mL) for cell wall digestion. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using universal primers SD-Bact-0008-a-S-20 (5′-AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG-′3) and S-D-Bact-1495-a-A-20 (5′-CTA CGG CTA CCT TGT TAC GA-′3) [38]. PCR was performed in a final volume of 25 μL containing 1 μL of the template DNA; 0.5 μM of each primer; 0.5 μM of deoxynucleotide triphosphate (dNTP); 2.5 μL 10X PCR buffer for Taq polymerase; MgCl2 1.5 mM; 1 UI of Taq polymerase. The amplification cycle was as follows: denaturation step at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles (45 sec at 94°C, 1 min at 55°C, and 2 min at 72°C) plus one additional cycle at 72°C for 7 min as a final elongation step. The 16S rDNA PCR amplicons were purified with Exonuclease-I and Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase (Exo-Sap, Fermentas, Life Sciences) following the manufacturer’s standard protocol. Sequence analyses of the purified DNAs were performed using a Big Dye Terminator cycle sequencing kit V3.1 (Applied Biosystems) and an Applied Biosystems 3130XL Capillary DNA Sequencer machine. Sequence similarities were found by BLAST analysis [39] using the GenBank DNA databases ( and the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP). Phylogenetic analyses of the 16S rRNA gene sequences were conducted with Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software, version 5 [40]. Trees were constructed by using neighbor-joining method [41]. The sequence was deposited in GenBank database under the accession number KC959984.

2.4. Degradation of PCP by Isolated Strain

The kinetics of the PCP removal under different conditions were conducted in 500 mL flasks, sealed with cotton stoppers, containing 100 mL of mineral salt medium (MSM) adjusted to pH 6.9, supplemented with 1% glucose and inoculated with 1% of 106 CFU/mL of the strain FAS23. The MSM contained the following components at the specified concentrations (in g/L): KH2PO4, 0.8; Na2HP4, 0.8; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.2; CaCl2·2H2O, 0.01; NH4Cl, 0.5, plus 1 mL of trace metal solution which includes (in mg/L) FeSO4·7H2O, 5; ZnSO4·7H2O, 4; MnSO4·4H2O, 0.2; NiCl·6H2O, 0.1; H3BO3, 0.15; CoCl2·6H2O, 0.5; ZnCl2 0.25; and EDTA, 2.5. PCP was added to the medium after autoclaving [19]. When necessary, solid MSM plates were prepared by adding 15 g/L bacteriological grade agar. The inoculum was prepared as follows: overnight culture was centrifuged and the pellet was rinsed twice with fresh MSM. PCP removal was monitored during 144 h of incubation by varying different parameters: (i) initial pH; (ii) initial PCP concentrations: 20, 50, 100, 200, and 300 mg/L corresponding to 0.075 mM, 0.19 mM, 0.37, 0.75 mM, and 1.14 mM, respectively; (iii) temperature of incubation: 25, 30, and 37°C; (iv) NaCl concentrations: 10 g/L, 30 g/L, 60 g/L, and 100 g/L; (v) the addition of nonionic surfactant Tween 80 (40 mg/L). Bacterial cell growth was evaluated by measuring the optical density at 600 nm using UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Spectro UVS-2700 Dual Beam Labomed, Inc) every 24 h of the incubation. Three controls were used: PCP-free MSM, uninoculated PCP containing MSM, and PCP containing MSM inoculated with heated inactivated cells. The cell suspension was centrifuged (5 min, 8000 rpm) and the supernatant was filtered through 0.22 μm filters [16]. Samples of 100 μL were applied to C18 reverse phase column (LiChrospher 100 RP-18 endcapped column, 250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., and particle size of 5 μm) at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. The retained molecules were eluted over 35 min using the following gradient: 1% (v/v) phosphoric acid in water for 4 min, followed by an increase to 100% (v/v) acetonitrile within 21 min which was kept constant for 5 min and then decreased back to initial concentration and kept constant for another 5 min. PCP was quantified using external standards method. Percent removal was estimated using the following formula: removal (%) = area − area/area [42].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data were subjected to analysis of variance using SPSS software (version 14.0) and the mean differences were compared by Student-Newman-Keuls comparison test. A value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant (test at ). Three replicates were prepared for each treatment.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation, Identification of FAS23 Strain, and 16S rDNA Sequence Based Phylogenetic Analysis

The bacterial strain FAS23 was isolated from the saline and arid sediment. The morphological aspect of FAS23 strain culture on the isolation medium YEM showed opaque, pale, cream, and convex colonies with glistening surface. Cells were Gram-positive, rod-shaped, and positive for catalase and oxidase tests. No growth under anaerobic conditions and no spore formation were recorded. The optimal growth conditions of FAS23 strain were pH of 7.0–8.5 and a temperature range of 28–30°C. The strain was able to grow at a range of salt concentrations from 1 to 100 g/L of NaCl. 16S rDNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis allowed the assignment of FAS23 strain to Janibacter sp. (Figure 1).

3.2. The Optimum Growth Conditions of Janibacter sp. Strain

The effect of physiological and biochemical variations (glucose supplement, temperature, pH, PCP concentration, and presence of biosurfactant) on bacterial growth of Janibacter sp. FAS23 and PCP removal was studied.

3.2.1. Effect of Glucose on the Growth of Janibacter sp. and PCP Removal

The effect of glucose as cosubstrate on the growth of Janibacter sp. strain and PCP removal was studied in MSM. The result showed that the growth of the strain was possible only after the addition of glucose (Figure 2(a)). As well, the PCP was efficiently removed in the presence of glucose, and 71.84% of PCP was degraded within 24 hours and more than 90% after 72 h (Figure 2(b)). The obtained results indicated the phenomenon of cometabolism in which microorganisms do not obtain energy from the transformation reaction; they rather require another substrate for growth [43].

3.2.2. Effect of pH and Temperature on the Growth of the Strain and PCP Removal

The effect of pH variations (4.0, 6.9, and 9.0) on the growth and PCP removal was assessed (Figure 3). At both pH 4.0 and 9.0, a low rate of growth and PCP removal was observed after 24 and 48 h of incubation. However, after 144 h of incubation, the rate of PCP removal has reached values of 44.80% and 70.22% at pH 4.0 and pH 9.0, respectively. The optimum growth and PCP removal were however observed at pH 6.9, as we noted a significant removal of PCP of 71.84%, 84.47%, and 99.06% after 24, 48, and 144 h of incubation, respectively. The strain FAS23 was able to grow in the temperature range of 25–37°C, with an optimum at 30°C. At 25 and 37°C, the growth of the bacterial strain, as well as PCP removal, was affected (Figure 4). However, at 25°C, the strain showed a better growth and PCP removal compared to temperature of 37°C. Likewise, the PCP removal was optimal at 30°C reaching 71.84% and 99.06% after 24 h and 144 h of incubation, respectively.

3.2.3. Effect of PCP Amount on the Growth and PCP Removal by Janibacter

Variation of PCP amount in the medium showed that the growth of the strain, as well as PCP removal, decreased with the increase of PCP concentration (Figure 5). At low concentrations (20 and 50 mg/L), the bacterial strain was able to remove the majority of PCP after 72 h of incubation time. Up to 100 mg/L, 50% of PCP could be removed after 72 h of incubation. However, with higher concentrations (200 and 300 mg/L), equivalent level of PCP removal could be reached if the incubation time is extended.

3.2.4. Effect of Various NaCl Concentrations on the PCP Removal

The strain was tested for its ability to remove PCP (20 mg/L) at different NaCl concentrations (0%, 1%, 3%, 6%, and 10%). The best rate of growth and PCP removal was recorded at 1% of NaCl (more than 92% after 144 h of incubation). The growth and thus the capacity of PCP removal were inhibited when the concentration of sodium chloride was increased (Figure 6). At 3% NaCl, the PCP removal was 72% after 144 h of incubation. When the NaCl concentration was increased to 6% and 10%, PCP removal falls to 46.53% and 17.62%, respectively.

3.2.5. Effect of Nonionic Surfactant Tween 80 on the Biodegradation of PCP

In this study, the nonionic surfactant Tween 80 was found to enhance the growth and PCP-biodegradation process (Figure 7). Interestingly, removal of high amount of PCP (300 mg/mL) was improved by 30% after 72 h of incubation, compared to the control (Figure 7(b)).

4. Discussion

The strain FAS23 isolated from saline sediment collected from Tunisian arid ecosystems was identified as an actinobacterium belonging to the genus Janibacter sp., with respect to morphological and biochemical tests and 16S rRNA gene sequence. Despite their known high potential in recalcitrant compounds biodegradation [29, 33], bacteria of the genus Janibacter, described in this study, are reported for the first time for their ability to degrade PCP. In biodegradation process, glucose is commonly used as an additional source of carbon and energy and is the most metabolizable sugar which supported a maximum growth [44]. In this context, our results are in agreement with those of Singh et al. [45] and Singh et al. [15] who reported the enhancement of bacterial growth and PCP-degradation process using MSM supplemented with 1% of glucose [43]. This effect can be explained by the connection of the two substrates metabolism. In fact, the NADH provided by glucose metabolism may increase the biomass and thus increase the total activity for PCP metabolizing [46].

In the present study, PCP removal is affected by pH variation. As it was reported by Premalatha and Rajakumar [43], Wolski et al. [47], Barbeau et al. [48], and Edgehill [22] for Arthrobacter and different Pseudomonas species, the neutral pH was found to be optimal for PCP degradation. However, for other bacterial species, such as Sphingomonas chlorophenolica, PCP degradation was more important at pH 9.2 [49].

Temperature is another important environmental factor that can influence the rate of pollutants degradation [48]. The optimal temperature for the PCP removal was recorded at 30°C, but lower temperatures (25°C) allowed significant removal than the upper values. These results were in accordance with those of Wittmann et al. [9] and Crawford and Mohn [50]. Overall, deviation in pH and temperature from the optimum results in alteration of microbial growth and metabolism, as well as the pollutants properties [51, 52].

The effect of different concentrations of PCP on growth of the strain proved that the PCP removal was more efficient at low concentrations (20 mg/L). This result was coherent with data of Webb et al. [53] reporting that all strains tested were able to degrade up to 90% of the PCP, when the concentration was 10 mg/L. Moreover, as it was revealed by Karn et al. [16], the ability of PCP removal of Janibacter sp. decreases when PCP concentration was increased. Furthermore, we found that the removal ability by Janibacter sp. has reached 40% after 144 h of incubation, when PCP concentration of 300 mg/L was used. These results are in accordance with those of Chandra et al. [54] for Bacillus cereus strain and may suggest that these bacteria may tolerate and remove high concentrations of PCP if we increase the incubation time. On the contrary, Kao et al. [55] reported that no PCP removal was detected with PCP concentrations of 320 mg/L even after 20 days of incubation.

As for bioremediation, the strain should possess not only the high removal efficiency for the target compounds but also the strong abilities of adapting some conditions such as pH, temperature, and salinity fluctuations. In this study, it was shown that Janibacter sp. was able to remove PCP even with salinity fluctuations (less than 10%). These results were in accordance with those of Gayathri and Vasudevan [56] suggesting that the reduction in phenolic components removal efficiency above 10% NaCl may be due to increase in salinity. These results indicated that Janibacter sp. strain has an inherent flexibility to adapt to salinity fluctuations.

The use of surfactants has the potential to increase the biodegradation rate of hydrophobic organic compounds in contaminated environments. Nonionic surfactants are usually used in the bioavailability studies due to their relatively low toxicity compared to ionic surfactants [57]. The enhanced biodegradation in the micelles solution can be attributable to the increased solubility, dissolution, and bioavailability of compound to bacteria [58] and the surfactant enhanced substrate transport through the microbial cell wall [59]. The effects of the surfactants on PCP removal have been invariably attributed to the increased solubility and dissolution of PCP or enhancement of mass transport in the presence of surfactants. In this context, at high concentration of PCP (300 mg/L), Tween 80 increases the removal rate of PCP when the Tween 80 concentration is 40 mg/L. The enhancement of PCP removal was slightly detected when the concentration of PCP is 20 mg/L. These results can be confirmed with the study of Cort et al. [60] when the biodegradation rate of PCP was enhanced for the concentration of PCP at 140 and 220 mg/L but it was inhibited for the concentration of PCP at 100 and 50 mg/L. Consequently, successful integration of PCP and Tween 80 degradation was achieved by Janibacter sp. strain.

5. Conclusion

In this study, a novel efficient PCP-degrading actinobacterium (Janibacter sp.) was isolated from saline soil of arid land and investigated for its physiological characteristics. Janibacter was able to remove high concentration of PCP and to tolerate fluctuation of NaCl. This removal potential was moreover accelerated by the addition of Tween 80. This study suggested that strain Janibacter sp. could be widely used for PCP bioremediation of polluted arid/extreme environments.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work was financially supported by the NATO Project SFP (ESP.MD.FFP981674) 0073 “Preventive and Remediation Strategies for Continuous Elimination of Poly-Chlorinated Phenols from Forest Soils and Groundwater.” It was in part further supported by the European Union in the ambit of the Project ULIXES (European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme, KBBE-2010-4 under Grant Agreement no. 266473).


  1. A. Vallecillo, P. A. Garcia-Encina, and M. Peña, “Anaerobic biodegradability and toxicity of chlorophenols,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 161–168, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Fetzner and F. Lingens, “Bacterial dehalogenases: biochemistry, genetics, and biotechnological applications,” Microbiological Reviews, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 641–685, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  3. C. M. Kao, C. T. Chai, J. K. Liu, T. Y. Yeh, K. F. Chen, and S. C. Chen, “Evaluation of natural and enhanced PCP biodegradation at a former pesticide manufacturing plant,” Water Research, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 663–672, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D.-S. Shen, X.-W. Liu, and H.-J. Feng, “Effect of easily degradable substrate on anaerobic degradation of pentachlorophenol in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 119, no. 1–3, pp. 239–243, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. Sai, K. S. Kang, A. Hirose, R. Hasegawa, J. E. Trosko, and T. Inoue, “Inhibition of apoptosis by pentachlorophenol in v-myc-transfected rat liver epithelial cells: relation to down-regulation of gap junctional intercellular communication,” Cancer Letters, vol. 173, no. 2, pp. 163–174, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. EPA, “Final determination and indent to cancel and deny applications for registrations of pesticide products containing pentachlorophenol (including but not limited to its salts and esters) for non-wood uses,” US Environmental Protection Agency. Federal Register, vol. 52, pp. 2282–2293, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  7. S. D. Copley, “Evolution of a metabolic pathway for degradation of a toxic xenobiotic: the patchwork approach,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 261–265, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. Errampalli, J. T. Trevors, H. Lee et al., “Bioremediation: a perspective,” Journal of Soil Contamination, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 207–218, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Wittmann, A. P. Zeng, and W. D. Deckwer, “Physiological characterization and cultivation strategies of the pentachlorophenol-degrading bacteria Sphingomonas chlorophenolica RA2 and Mycobacterium chlorophenolicum PCP-1,” Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 315–321, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. I. S. Thakur, R. Sharma, S. Shukla, and A. H. Ahmed, “Enumeration and enrichment of pentachlorophenol degrading bacterial of pulp and paper miller in the chemostat,” in Proceedings of the AMI Conference, vol. 159, pp. 25–27, Jaipur, India, November 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  11. J. H. A. Apajalahti, P. Karpanoja, and M. S. Salkinoja-Salonen, “Rhodococcus chlorophenolicus sp. nov., a chlorophenol-mineralizing actinomycete,” International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 246–251, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. F. Gonzalez and W. S. Hu, “Effect of glutamate on the degradation of pentachlorophenol by Flavobacterium sp,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 100–110, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. I. Dams, G. I. Paton, and K. Killham, “Rhizoremediation of pentachlorophenol by Sphingobium chlorophenolicum ATCC 39723,” Chemosphere, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 864–870, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C.-F. Yang, C.-M. Lee, and C.-C. Wang, “Isolation and physiological characterization of the pentachlorophenol degrading bacterium Sphingomonas chlorophenolica,” Chemosphere, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 709–714, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Singh, B. B. Singh, R. Chandra, D. K. Patel, and V. Rai, “Synergistic biodegradation of pentachlorophenol by Bacillus cereus (DQ002384), Serratia marcescens (AY927692) and Serratia marcescens (DQ002385),” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1821–1828, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. K. Karn, S. K. Chakrabarty, and M. S. Reddy, “Pentachlorophenol degradation by Pseudomonas stutzeri CL7 in the secondary sludge of pulp and paper mill,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1608–1612, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Sharma, I. S. Thakur, and P. Dureja, “Enrichment, isolation and characterization of pentachlorophenol degrading bacterium Acinetobacter sp. ISTPCP-3 from effluent discharge site,” Biodegradation, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 643–650, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Kamekura, “Diversity of extremely halophilic bacteria,” Extremophiles, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 289–295, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. R. Margesin and F. Schinner, “Potential of halotolerant and halophilic microorganisms for biotechnology,” Extremophiles, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 73–83, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. W. D. Grant, R. T. Gemmell, and T. J. McGenity, “Halophiles,” in Extremophiles: Microbial Life in Extreme Environments, K. Horikoshi and W. D. Grant, Eds., pp. 93–132, Wiley-Liss, New York, NY, USA, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  21. C. K. Okoro, R. Brown, A. L. Jones et al., “Diversity of culturable actinomycetes in hyper-arid soils of the Atacama Desert, Chile,” Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 121–133, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. U. Edgehill, “Pentachlorophenol removal from slightly acidic mineral salts, commercial sand, and clay soil by recovered Arthrobacter strain ATCC 33790,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 142–148, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. K. Karn, S. K. Chakrabarti, and M. S. Reddy, “Degradation of pentachlorophenol by Kocuria sp. CL2 isolated from secondary sludge of pulp and paper mill,” Biodegradation, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 63–69, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. K. Martin, P. Schumann, F. A. Rainey, B. Schuetze, and I. Groth, “Janibacter limosus gen. nov., sp. nov., a new actinomycete with meso- diaminopimelic acid in the cell wall,” International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 529–534, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J.-H. Yoon, K.-C. Lee, S.-S. Kang, Y.-H. Kho, K.-H. Kang, and Y.-H. Park, “Janibacter terrae sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from soil around a wastewater treatment plant,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1821–1827, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  26. J.-H. Yoon, H. B. Lee, S.-H. Yeo, and J.-E. Choi, “Janibacter melonis sp. nov., isolated from abnormally spoiled oriental melon in Korea,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1975–1980, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. Kageyama, Y. Takahashi, M. Yasumoto-Hirose, H. Kasai, Y. Shizuri, and S. Omura, “Janibacter corallicola sp. nov., isolated from coral in Palau,” Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 185–189, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. P. Kämpfer, O. Terenius, J. M. Lindh, and I. Faye, “Janibacter anophelis sp. nov., isolated from the midgut of Anopheles arabiensis,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 389–392, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. I. Sierra, J. L. Valera, M. L. Marina, and F. Laborda, “Study of the biodegradation process of polychlorinated biphenyls in liquid medium and soil by a new isolated aerobic bacterium (Janibacter sp.),” Chemosphere, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 609–618, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Iwai, A. Yamazoe, R. Takahashi, F. Kurisu, and O. Yagi, “Degradation of monochlorinated dibeno -p-Dioxins by Janibacter sp. strain YA isolated from river sediment,” Current Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 353–358, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Jin, T. Zhu, X. Xu, and Y. Xu, “Biodegradation of dibenzofuran by Janibacter terrae strain XJ-1,” Current Microbiology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 30–36, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. Yamazoe, O. Yagi, and H. Oyaizu, “Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by a newly isolated dibenzofuran-utilizing Janibacter sp. strain YY-1,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 211–218, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  33. A. Yamazoe, O. Yagi, and H. Oyaizu, “Biotransformation of fluorene, diphenyl ether, dibenzo-p-dioxin and carbazole by Janibacter sp,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 479–486, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. G.-Y. Zhang, J.-Y. Ling, H.-B. Sun, J. Luo, Y.-Y. Fan, and Z.-J. Cui, “Isolation and characterization of a newly isolated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons-degrading Janibacter anophelis strain JY11,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 172, no. 2-3, pp. 580–586, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. D. A. Edwards, R. G. Luthy, and Z. Liu, “Solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in micellar nonionic surfactant solutions,” Envirenmental Science and Technology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 127–133, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. C. Rösch, A. Mergel, and H. Bothe, “Biodiversity of denitrifying and dinitrogen-fixing bacteria in an acid forest soil,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 3818–3829, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. K. Wilson, “Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria,” in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, F. M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R. E. Kingston et al., Eds., pp. 241–245, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  38. D. Daffonchio, S. Borin, G. Frova, P. L. Manachini, and C. Sorlini, “PCR fingerprinting of whole genomes: the spacers between the 16s and 23S rRNA genes and of intergenic tRNA gene regions reveal a different intraspecific genomic variability of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus licheniformis,” International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 107–116, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. F. Altschul, W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman, “Basic local alignment search tool,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 215, no. 3, pp. 403–410, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. K. Tamura, D. Peterson, N. Peterson, G. Stecher, M. Nei, and S. Kumar, “MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2731–2739, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. N. Saitou and M. Nei, “The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.,” Molecular biology and evolution, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 406–425, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  42. I. S. Thakur, “Structural and functional characterization of a stable, 4-chlorosalicylic-acid-degrading, bacterial community in a chemostat,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 643–645, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. Premalatha and G. S. Rajakumar, “Pentachlorophenol degradation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 334–337, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. Tripathi and S. K. Garg, “Studies on selection of efficient bacterial strain simultaneously tolerant to hexavalent chromium and pentachlorophenol isolated from treated tannery effluent,” Research Journal of Microbiology, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 707–716, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. Singh, R. Chandra, D. K. Patel, and V. Rai, “Isolation and characterization of novel Serratia marcescens (AY927692) for pentachlorophenol degradation from pulp and paper mill waste,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 1747–1754, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. Cai and L. Xun, “Organization and regulation of pentachlorophenol-degrading genes in Sphingobium chlorophenolicum ATCC 39723,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 184, no. 17, pp. 4672–4680, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. E. A. Wolski, S. E. Murialdo, and J. F. Gonzalez, “Effect of pH and inoculum size on pentachlorophenol degradation by Pseudomonas sp,” Water SA, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 93–98, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  48. C. Barbeau, L. Deschênes, D. Karamanev, Y. Comeau, and R. Samson, “Bioremediation of pentachlorophenol-contaminated soil by bioaugmentation using activated soil,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 745–752, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. C.-F. Yang, C.-M. Lee, and C.-C. Wang, “Degradation of chlorophenols using pentachlorophenol-degrading bacteria Sphingomonas chlorophenolica in a batch reactor,” Current Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 156–160, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. R. L. Crawford and W. W. Mohn, “Microbiological removal of pentachlorophenol from soil using a Flavobacterium,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 617–620, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J. T. Trevors, “Effect of temperature on the degradation of pentachlorophenol by Pseudomonas species,” Chemosphere, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 471–475, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. A. Providenti, H. Lee, and J. T. Trevors, “Selected factors limiting the microbial degradation of recalcitrant compounds,” Journal of Industrial Microbiology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 379–395, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. D. Webb, G. Ewbank, J. Perkins, and A. J. McCarthy, “Metabolism of pentachlorophenol by Saccharomonospora viridis strains isolated from mushroom compost,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 33, no. 14, pp. 1903–1914, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. R. Chandra, A. Ghosh, R. K. Jain, and S. Singh, “Isolation and characterization of two potential pentachlorophenol degrading aerobic bacteria from pulp paper effluent sludge,” The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 125–130, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. C. M. Kao, J. K. Liu, Y. L. Chen, C. T. Chai, and S. C. Chen, “Factors affecting the biodegradation of PCP by Pseudomonas mendocina NSYSU,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 124, no. 1–3, pp. 68–73, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. K. V. Gayathri and N. Vasudevan, “Enrichment of phenol degrading moderately halophilic bacterial consortium from saline environment,” Journal of Bioremediation & Biodegradation, vol. 2011, article 104, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. D. H. Yeh, K. D. Pennell, and S. G. Pavlostathis, “Toxicity and biodegradability screening of nonionic surfactants using sediment-derived methanogenic consortia,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 55–62, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. F. Volkering, A. M. Breure, J. G. van Andel, and W. H. Rulkens, “Influence of nonionic surfactants on bioavailability and biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1699–1705, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  59. W. H. Noordman, J. H. J. Wachter, G. J. de Boer, and D. B. Janssen, “The enhancement by surfactants of hexadecane degradation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa varies with substrate availability,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 195–212, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. T. L. Cort, M.-S. Song, and A. R. Bielefeldt, “Nonionic surfactant effects on pentachlorophenol biodegradation,” Water Research, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1253–1261, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Amel Khessairi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1421 Views | 690 Downloads | 7 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.