Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 326532, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/326532
Research Article

Evaluating the Therapeutic Dose Distribution of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image: A Methodological Study

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dong Feng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China

Received 4 June 2014; Accepted 9 July 2014; Published 17 August 2014

Academic Editor: An Liu

Copyright © 2014 Guang-shun Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. X. Q. Jiang, S. Bai, R. M. Zhong et al., “Relationships between cone beam CT value and physical density in image guided radiation therapy,” Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 372–376, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  2. S. Yoo and F. F. Yin, “Feasibility of Cone-beam CT based treatment planning,” in World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2006, vol. 14 of IFMBE Proceedings, pp. 1831–1834, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. M. van Zijtveld, M. Dirkx, and B. Heijmen, “Correction of conebeam CT values using a planning CT for derivation of the ‘dose of the day’,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 195–200, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. I. Fotina, J. Hopfgartner, M. Stock, T. Steininger, C. Lütgendorf-Caucig, and D. Georg, “Feasibility of CBCT-based dose calculation: comparative analysis of HU adjustment techniques,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 249–256, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. C. H. Chu, B. Ni, R. Kriz, and V. Amod Saxena, “Applications of simulator computed tomography number for photon dose calculations during radiotherapy treatment planning,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 65–73, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Rong, J. Smilowitz, D. Tewatia, W. A. Tomé, and B. Paliwal, “Dose calculation on KV cone beam CT images: an investigation of the hu-density conversion stability and dose accuracy using the site-specific calibration,” Medical Dosimetry, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 195–207, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Boggula, F. Lorenz, Y. Abo-Madyan et al., “A new strategy for online adaptive prostate radiotherapy based on cone-beam CT,” Journal of Medical Physics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 264–276, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Y. Chi, Q. Wu, and D. Yan, “Dose Calculation on Cone Beam CT,” Medical Physics, vol. 34, no. 6, p. 2438, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  9. S. F. Petit, W. Elmpt, P. Lambin, and A. L. Dekker, “Dose recalculation in megavoltage cone-beam CT for treatment evaluation: removal of cupping and truncation artefacts in scans of the thorax and abdomen,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 359–366, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Yoo and F. Yin, “Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CT-based treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 1553–1561, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Richter, Q. Hu, D. Steglich et al., “Investigation of the usability of conebeam CT data sets for dose calculation,” Radiation Oncology, vol. 3, no. 1, article 42, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Z. Wang, W. G. Hu, and G. Cai, “Using corrected Cone-Beam CT image foraccelerated partial breast irradiation treatment dose verification: the preliminary experience,” Radiation Oncology, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 214, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  13. L. Xing, J. Siebers, and P. Keall, “Computational challenges for image-guided radiation therapy: framework and current research,” Seminars in Radiation Oncology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 245–257, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Y. Tsuji, A. H. Hwang, V. W. Weinberg, S. S. Yom, J. M. Quivey, and P. Xia, “Dosimetric evaluation of automatic segmentation for adaptive IMRT for head-and-neck cancer,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 707–714, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Veiga, J. McClelland, S. Moinuddin et al., “Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: feasible study on using CT-to-CBCT deformable registration for “dose of day” calculations,” Medical Physics, vol. 41, no. 3, Article ID 031703, 2014. View at Google Scholar