BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 415651 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/415651

Fibrinogen Alpha Chain Precursor and Apolipoprotein A-I in Urine as Biomarkers for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Calcium Oxalate Nephrolithiasis: A Proteomics Study

Academic Editor: Tomohito Gohda
Received17 Feb 2014
Revised08 Apr 2014
Accepted04 Jul 2014
Published23 Jul 2014

Abstract

Calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis is the most common urological disease, but noninvasive and convenient methods of diagnosis are rarely available. Objective. The present study aimed to identify potential urine biomarkers for noninvasive diagnosis of CaOx nephrolithiasis. Methodology. Urine samples from 72 patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis and 30 healthy controls were collected and proteomics analysis was performed using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometer (MALDI-TOF-MS). Results. Thirteen proteins/peptides displayed statistically significant differences. The peptides of m/z 1207.23 and 2773.86 were selected by the genetic algorithm (GA) to build a possible diagnostic model. The area under the curve of m/z 1207.23 and 2773.86 was 0.936 and 0.987, respectively. The diagnostic model in distinguishing patients and healthy subjects showed 100% sensitivity and specificity. The peak at m/z 2773.86 was identified as fibrinogen alpha chain (FGA) with the sequence G.EGDFLAEGGGVR.G, and the peak at m/z 2773.86 was identified as apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) with the sequence L.PVLESFKVSFLSALEEYTKKLNTQ. Conclusion. The study results strongly suggested that urinary FGA and apoA-I are highly sensitive and specific biomarkers for noninvasive diagnosis of CaOx nephrolithiasis.

1. Introduction

Nephrolithiasis is a global problem spanning all geographies with an estimated annual incidence of 4% in China and 1-2% in United States of America (USA) [1, 2]. The lifetime risk of nephrolithiasis varies from 1 to 5% in Asia, 10 to 15% in USA, and 5 to 9% in Europe [3]. In addition, recent evidence reveals that renal calculi are becoming more common [4]. According to data from the Urological Diseases in America project, the total annual cost of nephrolithiasis in the USA in the year 2000 was about $5.3 billion. In spite of that, posttreatment recurrence rates are high, and the recurrence rate of nephrolithiasis is expected to exceed 30% within 10 years of an initial stone event [5]. Recent studies showed nephrolithiasis and related obstruction as risk factors to chronic kidney disease (CKD), and CKD was twofold higher among individuals with history of kidney stones [6, 7]. Until now, nephrolithiasis could only be diagnosed by imaging examinations, however, the use of which becomes less when the stone is <5 mm. About 70–80% are calcium-containing stones, which include calcium oxalate (CaOx) and calcium phosphate [8]. CaOx stone may be considered as a complex condition having multiple mechanisms, which have not been clearly understood. Even though a noninvasive diagnostic test for detecting nephrolithiasis has been suggested, there are still few reliable biomarkers that could be used to aid clinicians to diagnose this condition.

In recent years, progress in mass spectrometry and its hyphenation with the separation techniques has made these tools essential in life sciences. MS is a sensitive analytical technique, which is able to quantify analysis and identify unknown molecules. Urine is one of the most important biofluids in clinical proteomics, since it is easily accessible in a large quantity without the use of invasive procedures [9]. In addition, pathophysiologic changes in the urinary tract and kidneys are reflected by changes in the urinary proteome [10]. Coon et al. determined that the human urinary proteome apparently contains over 100,000 different peptides, of which at least 5000 have high frequency [11]. Recent reports have advocated employing the MS approach for determining specific patterns that are indicative of renal, bladder, and prostate cancers [1214]. Urine is a rich noninvasive source of potential biomarkers of disease that awaits exploration.

The present study aimed to identify potential urine biomarkers for noninvasive diagnosis of CaOx nephrolithiasis by differentiating urinary proteome features between patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis and healthy subjects matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometer and linear trap quadrupole.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

Patients with nephrolithiasis (; male = 44 and female = 28), who were hospitalized at the Department of Urological Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, between January 2013 and September 2013, were prospectively enrolled in the study. Nephrolithiasis was preoperatively diagnosed in all patients by imaging examination, and they underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and their stone samples were analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (Bruker tensor 27, Bruker Germany). Patients with calculi other than CaOx and other diseases such as diabetic nephropathy, CKD, and acute kidney injury were excluded. Thirty healthy medical staff from the institution, who did not have any evidence of nephrolithiasis or other related diseases, were also enrolled as controls. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the hospital’s ethics committee.

2.2. Samples Collection

After obtaining informed consent, morning midstream spot urine samples of patients were obtained immediately on the second day after admission and were collected in 50 mL urine cups. Within 4 h, samples were centrifuged at 10000 g for 10 min at room temperature. Aliquots of 800 μL were stored at −80°C until further use. All samples were collected and processed using the same procedure to minimize preanalytical bias.

2.3. Proteomics Analysis for the Urine Peptides Differences

MALDI-TOF-MS analysis was performed as recommended in the manufacturer’s protocol (Bruker Daltonics, Leipzig, Germany). MALDI-TOF MS samples were processed using a magnetic bead-based weak cation exchanger (WCX, Bruker Daltonics, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Samples (20 μL each) were diluted with 20 μL binding solution and added to the bead slurry (5 μL) in a 200 μL polypropylene tube, which was mixed thoroughly and incubated in the tube for 10 min. After magnetic bead separation and washings, samples were purified through the following three steps: binding, washing, and elution. The processed samples were analyzed using a linear MALDI-TOF-MS (Ultra-flex; Bruker Daltonics, Leipzig, Germany) equipped with a pulsed ion extraction source. The MALDI-TOF-MS system was controlled by Flex Control software v.2.0 (Bruker Daltonics, Leipzig, Germany). Each spectrum was detected in linear positive mode and was externally calibrated using a mixture of peptide/protein standards between 1000 and 10000 Da.

2.4. Identification of Protein Biomarkers by Nanoliquid Chromatography (LC)/Electrospray Ionization- (ESI-) MS/MS

The sequences of differential expression peptides between patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis and controls were identified using a nano-LC/ESI-tandem MS system consisting of an Aquity ultra performance LC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, USA) and LTQ Obitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a nano-ESI source (Michrom Bioresources, Auburn, USA). MS/MS experimental protocol involved the following steps. Peptides were resuspended with 20 μL solvent A (5% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid in water). 10 μL peptide solution was loaded onto the Captrap Peptide column (2 mm × 0.5 mm, Michrom Bioresources, Auburn, USA) at a 20 μL/min flow rate of solvent A for 5 min and then was separated on a Magic C18AQ reverse phase column (100 μm id × 15 cm, Michrom Bioresources, Auburn, USA) with a three-step linear gradient: starting from 5% B (90% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid in water) to 45% B (in other words, from 95% A to 55% A) in 100 min and increased to 80% B in 3 min and then to 5% B in 2 min. The column was reequilibrated at initial conditions for 15 min. The column flow rate was maintained at 500 nL/min, and column temperature was maintained at 35°C. The electrospray voltage of 1.8 kV against the inlet of MS was used. The MS instrument was operated in a data-dependent model. The range of full scan was 400–10,000 m/z. The eight most intense monoisotope ions were the precursors for collision-induced dissociation. MS/MS spectra were limited to two consecutive scans per precursor ion, followed by 60 s of dynamic exclusion.

The mass spectra were searched using ClinProt Tools software 2.2 (Bruker Daltonik, Leipzig, Germany). Human International Protein Index (IPI) database (IPI human v3.68 fasta with 87061 entries) and National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) protein-protein BLAST database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) were used to search. The searching parameters were set as no enzyme, and oxidation on methionine was set as variable modification. The peptide mass tolerance was 10 ppm, and the fragment ion tolerance was 1.0 Da. Peptides with a confidence level score of >95% were accepted as correct matches.

2.5. Diagnostic Model for CaOx Nephrolithiasis

Establishment of model in the training set: the urine peptide profiles of 18 patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis and 6 healthy controls in the training set were analyzed. The reproducibility of mass spectral generation was determined by the mean relative peak intensities. All the spectra obtained from the urine samples in the training set were analyzed using ClinProt Tools to subtract baseline, normalize spectra (using total ion current), and determine peak m/z values and intensities in the mass range of 1000 to 10000 Da. The signal-to-noise ratio should be higher than five. To align the spectra, a mass shift of <0.1% was determined. The peak area was used as quantitative standardization. Comparison of relative peak intensity levels between two groups was also calculated within the software suite.

2.6. Statistical Methods and Evaluation of Assay Precision

To evaluate the precision of the assay, within- and between-run variations were determined using multiple analyses of bead fractionation and MS for the two urinary samples. For the within- and between-run variations, three peaks with various intensities were examined. Within-run imprecision was determined by evaluating the coefficient of variation (CV) for each sample using eight assays within a run and between-run imprecision by performing eight assays for 7 d was then determined.

Data obtained by measurements were given as mean ± standard deviation. SPSS (version 17.0, SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL) was used for the analysis of clinical characteristics of patients with nephrolithiasis and healthy subjects using test or -test. Student’s -test was used for analysis of normally distributed continuous data, while Wilcoxon test was used for nonnormally distributed continuous data. Chi-square test was used for categorical data analysis. was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Reproducibility, Precision, and Accuracy

For the precision and accuracy of the proteomic data in the present analyses, the six within-run and six between-run assays reproducibility of the two samples were performed using MALDI-TOF-MS analysis. In each profile, three peaks with different molecular masses were selected to evaluate the precision of the assay. The peak CVs were all <3% in the within-run and <10% in the between-run assays. These values were consistent with the reproducibility data for the protein biology system reported by the manufacturer.

3.2. Discovery Screening of Differences between Patients with Nephrolithiasis and Healthy Subjects

To screen urine peptides of interest to diagnose CaOx nephrolithiasis, urinary samples of training set from 54 patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis and 24 healthy controls were analyzed by MALDI-TOF-MS with WCX-MB (Table 1). Samples were randomly distributed during processing and analysis. A total of 56 distinct m/z values were resolved in the 1000 to 10000 Da range (Figure 1). Differences in peak positions and intensities were observed, and two-tailed -test was used to obtain a value for each peak and rank the peaks with value (Figure 2). The result of -test showed that 13 proteins/peptides (including 8 downregulated and 5 upregulated proteins/peptides) displayed statistically significant differences () between patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis and healthy subjects (Table 2).


CharacteristicsTraining set Test setTotal

Nephrolithiasis
 Number of cases ( )541872
 Gender (M/F)32/2212/644/28
 Mean age (years)33.5 ± 4.930.4 ± 5.332.9 ± 5.0
 Stone size (length × width × height/mm)18 ± 6 × 10 ± 1.5 × 14 ± 611 ± 3 × 7 ± 1 × 10 ± 2a15 ± 4 × 9 ± 1 × 12 ± 4
 Grade of hydronephrosis
  I19423
  II30636
  III10313
 Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)5.5 ± 1.24.9 ± 0.9a5.2 ± 1.4
 Serum creatinine ( mol/L)87.19 ± 7.9879.41 ± 9.16a84.74 ± 6.98
Volunteers
 Number of cases ( )24630
 Gender (M/F)17/74/221/9
 Mean age (years)25.6 ± 3.727.2 ± 1.826.1 ± 2.5
 Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)4.8 ± 0.44.2 ± 1.5b4.5 ± 0.9
 Serum creatinine ( mol/L)66.91 ± 5.4962.43 ± 4.17b64.89 ± 4.88

, test set compared with training set in nephrolithiasis
, test set compared with training set in healthy volunteers.
Standard BUN 1.8–7.1 mmol/L, standard SCr 59–104 mmol/L.

MRI (SD)b in nephrolithiasisMRI (SD)b in healthy controlRegulation in nephrolithiasis valuec

1207.233.64 (1.82)7.85 (1.12)0.00856
2773.8683.95 (28.39)27.53 (15.98)0.00867
6182.87144.19 (66.93)38.66 (17.53)0.00878
2847.8693.37 (67.89)517.79 (105.24)0.0012
6295.88112.66 (79.63)647 (152.98)0.00168
4754.38202.07 (169.92)603.03 (148.77)0.00216
6131.8349.73 (22.97)202.03 (46.99)0.00216
6083.7015.22 (5.15)53.19 (12.59)0.00302
6069.5615.7 (5.36)48.95 (11.46)0.00302
2830.1854.1 (23.42)22.1 (9.66)0.00325
6327.866.39 (2.26)20.96 (5.87)0.00642
2757.24389.82 (183.01)172.63 (111.86)0.0279
2726.0134.08 (12.71)19.42 (7.81)0.0314

, average mass.
bMRI, mean relative intensity.
value calculated with -test. Statistical significance was considered at .

3.3. Selection of Urinary Biomarker and Assessment of Diagnostic Efficacy

A class prediction model set up by genetic algorithm (GA) in ClinProTools was utilized to generate diagnostic models to discriminate patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis from the healthy controls in training set. Among the differentially expressed proteins/peptides, m/z 1207.23 and m/z 2773.86 were selected by the GA to build a possible diagnostic model. The peptide of m/z 1207.03 was observed to be significantly downregulated in patients with nephrolithiasis (). On the contrary, the peptide of m/z 2773.86 was observed to be remarkably upregulated in the patients ().

The accuracy of the established GA classification model in the testing was verified, which included 18 patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis and six healthy volunteers. The diagnostic capability of each peak was determined by the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. When the peptide of m/z 1207.03 was used to distinguish patients from the healthy subjects, the area under the curve (AUC) of m/z 1207.03 was 0.936 (a sensitivity of 94.4% and specificity of 83.3%, 95% CI: 0.909 to 0.962), and the AUC of m/z 2773.86 was 0.987 (a sensitivity of 94.4% and specificity of 100%, 95% CI: 0.925 to 0.996) (Figure 3, Tables 3 and 4). The GA model established with the two peaks defining correct which classified the nephrolithiasis samples as positive and healthy samples as negative provided both 100% sensitivity and specificity in the testing.


GroupTestSensitivity (94.4%)Specificity (83.3%)

Nephrolithiasis1817/18
Healthy control65/6


GroupTestSensitivity (94.4%)Specificity (100%)

Nephrolithiasis1817/18
Healthy control66/6

3.4. Identification of Markers

The potential protein peptides at m/z 1207.03 and m/z 2773.86 could distinguish patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis from the healthy subjects. With LTQ-Orbitrap-MS detection, 6 peptides (including m/z 1207.03 and m/z 2773.86 Da) among the total 13 peptides of differential expression were identified successfully, and others were uncharacterized (Table 5). The MS data was subjected to IPI human v3.68 fasta with 87061 entries for peptide sequencing and NCBI database for protein identification. The peptide of m/z 1207.03 was identified as fibrinogen alpha chain precursor with the sequence G.EGDFLAEGGGVR.G (IPI00021885, gene symbol = FGA) (Figure 4(a)). The peak at m/z 2773.86 was identified as apolipoprotein A-I precursor with the sequence L.PVLESFKVSFLSALEEYTKKLNTQ.-(IPI00021841, gene symbol = apoA-I) (Figure 4(b)).


Peptide namePeptide sequences

1207.23FGA isoform 1 of fibrinogen alpha chain precursorG.EGDFLAEGGGVR.G
2773.86apoA-1 apolipoprotein A-I precursorL.PVLESFKVSFLSALEEYTKKLNTQ.-
6182.87Uncharacterized peptide
2847.86FGA isoform 1 of fibrinogen alpha chain precursorS.SSYSKQFTSSTSYNRGDSTFESKSY.K
6295.88Uncharacterized peptide
4754.38Uncharacterized peptide
6131.83Uncharacterized peptide
6083.70Uncharacterized peptide
6069.56Uncharacterized peptide
2830.18TMSL3 thymosin beta-4-like protein 3K.KTETQEKNPLPSKETIEQEKQAGES.-
6327.86Uncharacterized peptide
2757.24F13A1 coagulation factor XIII A chain precursorR.RAVPPNNSNAAEDDLPTVELQGVVPR.G
2726.01COPA coatomer subunit alphaR.FWVLAAHPNLNLFAAGHDGGMIVFK.L

, average mass.

4. Discussion

Urolithiasis is a relevant clinical problem with a subsequent burden for one’s health. With its complex etiology and high rate of recurrences, urinary tract stone disease possesses a medical challenge. Calcium containing stones are the most common, constituting about 75% of all urinary calculi. Under normal examinations such as blood and urinary tests, urologists could not make precise diagnosis until the identification of renal function injury and inflammation. On the contrary, the imaging tests such as X-ray and computed tomography scan are widely used to diagnose calculi of even a small size. However, the radiographical examinations are not suitable for children, teenagers, and pregnant women due to chances for the development of radiation-induced injury. Application of noninvasive and convenience methods to diagnose and assess renal stone disease is still a challenge to clinicians.

Many proteins present in stone and some proteins normally present in urine, but their role in urolithiasis remains unknown. Developments in proteomics have successfully been applied to meet the demands. Proteomic analyses based on MS technique provided us the innovative ways to identify the components of urinary protein complexes. Proteomic profiling is based on the fact that proteins represent the dynamic state of the cells, reflecting earlier pathological and physiological changes in the disease more accurately than genomic sequencing [15]. Numerous studies have widely recognized the value of proteomics as a diagnostic and predicting tool in various diseases [16, 17]. Urine is both easily available in large quantities without invasive procedures and also stable enough for proteome analysis [18]. Urinary proteomic analysis has shown that several renal diseases can be detected by the presence of specific polypeptides in the urine [19, 20]. The recent proteomic studies of nephrolithiasis have revealed the components of stone. Aggarwal et al. [21] identified three antilithiatic cationic proteins such as histone-lysine N-methyltransferase, inward rectifier K channel, and protein Wnt-2 by MALDI-TOF-MS in CaOx stones. However, only few studies have focused on the difference in urinary proteome between the patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis and healthy subjects.

In this study, a case-control comparative analysis was designed between patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis and healthy subjects, and the difference in the urinary proteome was analyzed. The protein profiling was performed by MALDI-TOF-MS after proteome fractionation with magnetic beads, and it acts as the precise and rapid technique for investigation of complex urine samples. The urine samples of patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis showed 13 significantly differentiated proteins/peptides, including 8 downregulated and 5 upregulated proteins/peptides. The most two significantly differentiated peptides, which are obtained at m/z 1207.03 and m/z 2773.86, were developed as diagnosis model by the GA analysis. The diagnosis model achieved recognition capacity and cross validation close to 100% to discriminate patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis from the healthy subjects. The AUC of peak at m/z 1207.03 and m/z 2773.86 Da determined by the ROC curve were 0.936 and 0.986. Further, m/z 1207.03 and m/z 2773.86 Da were identified as fibrinogen alpha chain precursor (FGA) and apolipoprotein A-I precursor (apoA-I) by LTQ Obitrap XL.

FGA fragments were observed at m/z 1207.23 and m/z 2847.86, respectively, and the m/z 1207.23 suggested high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating the patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis and healthy subjects. FGA has been identified in urine to assist diagnosis and evaluate prognosis in many diseases such as urinary tract infection [22], bladder cancer [23], and kidney ischemia/reperfusion injury [24]. FGA is a protein, which is encoded in human by the FGA gene, and it is the component of fibrinogen (FG), a major blood protein that consists of pairs of three different polypeptide chains such as , , and , joined by disulfide bonds to form a symmetric dimeric structure. Fibrinogen can be digested either by plasmin or by thrombin, and the activities of plasmin and thrombin are regulated or progressively activated by calcium ions; therefore, the changes in the calcium ion channels in the CaOx calculi may affect the fibrinolytic system. In addition, Drew et al. [25] found that fibrinogen plays an important role in the progress of tissue repair. Fg-deficient (Fg−/−) mice were studied in a cutaneous wound healing model, and the results revealed an abnormal pattern of tissue repair including misguided epithelium, delayed wound closure, and reduced tensile strength. In the present study, FGA was downregulated in patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis, which suggested that the low level of FGA might lead to abnormal nephron repair and stone formation.

The results of the present study have suggested that a high level of urine apoA-I may be associated with CaOx nephrolithiasis. ApoA-I constitutes approximately 70% of the apolipoprotein content of high-density lipoprotein particles, and several studies have reported the apoA-I changes in kidney diseases. Sethi et al. [26] analyzed the renal biopsy and nephrectomy specimens of renal amyloidosis and identified the expression of apoA-I in the amyloid deposits. Lopez-Hellin et al. [27] reported that apoA-I was remarkably increased in the urine of patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The kidney cortex appears to be an important site of apoA-I catabolism. This uptake has been thought to be the result of glomerular filtration, tubular reabsorption, and intracellular degradation of lipid-poor apoA-I [28]; and the progress is caused by the binding of apoA-I to cubilin, functioning in line with megalin. Cubilin has been shown to form a functional receptor complex with the protein [29]. Kozyraki et al. found apoA-I loss in the urine of humans with defective cubilin and cubilin-amnionless function [30]. Hence, it could be speculated that the aopA-I upregulation in urine of patients with CaOx may be because of the reason that calculi affect the normal function of glomerular and break the balance of cubilin-amnionless. However, the association of changes in aopA-I levels and differences in the lipoprotein-related proteome between the urine of patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis and healthy controls remains unclear and warrants further in-depth investigation.

The FGA and apoA-I proteins/peptides could serve as diagnosis-associated biomarkers for patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis. Moreover, they may contribute to the establishment of a novel noninvasive diagnostic method and may facilitate personalized medical therapy for patients with CaOx nephrolithiasis. Further proteomics researches are recommended to identify the diagnostic difference of peptide fragments used in detecting different sorts of calculi.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declared no potential conflict of interests with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Wei Zhu, Min Liu, and Jun-Hua Zheng conceived and designed the experiments. Wei Zhu, Jun-Hua Zheng and Qing-Wei Ma performed the experiments. Guang-Chun Wang and Bo Peng analyzed the data. Bo Peng, Yang Yan, Jian-Ping Che, Qing-Wei Ma, Xu-Dong Yao, and Jun-Hua Zheng contributed by reagents/materials/analysis tools. Wei Zhu, Min Liu, and Jun-Hua Zheng wrote the paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Zi-Meng Zhang and Dr. Yan Li of Bioyong Technologies Inc., for their expertise in protein identification.

References

  1. J. M. Soucie, M. J. Thun, R. J. Coates, W. McClellan, W. Mcclellan, and H. Austin, “Demographic and geographic variability of kidney stones in the United States,” Kidney International, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 893–899, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Q. Zeng and Y. He, “Age-specific prevalence of kidney stones in Chinese urban inhabitants,” Urolithiasis, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 91–93, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. Bartoletti, T. Cai, N. Mondaini et al., “Epidemiology and risk factors in urolithiasis,” Urologia Internationalis, vol. 79, supplement 1, pp. 3–7, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. D. Scales Jr., A. C. Smith, J. M. Hanley, C. S. Saigal, and Urologic Diseases in America Project, “Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States,” European Urology, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 160–165, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  5. A. Trinchieri, F. Ostini, R. Nespoli, F. Rovera, E. Montanari, and G. Zanetti, “A prospective study of recurrence rate and risk factors for recurrence after a first renal stone,” Journal of Urology, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 27–30, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Hippisley-Cox and C. Coupland, “Predicting the risk of chronic kidney disease in men and women in England and Wales: prospective derivation and external validation of the QKidney® Scores,” BMC Family Practice, vol. 11, article 49, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. Vupputuri, J. M. Soucie, W. McClellan, and D. P. Sandler, “History of kidney stones as a possible risk factor for chronic kidney disease,” Annals of Epidemiology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 222–228, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Daudon, J. C. Doré, P. Jungers, and B. Lacour, “Changes in stone composition according to age and gender of patients: a multivariate epidemiological approach,” Urological Research, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 241–247, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  9. S. Decramer, A. G. de Peredo, B. Breuil et al., “Urine in clinical proteomics,” Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 1850–1862, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. Fliser, J. Novak, V. Thongboonkerd et al., “Advances in urinary proteome analysis and biomarker discovery,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1057–1071, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. J. Coon, P. Zürbig, M. Dakna et al., “CE-MS analysis of the human urinary proteome for biomarker discovery and disease diagnostics,” Proteomics-Clinical Applications, vol. 2, no. 7-8, pp. 964–973, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. D. Theodorescu, E. Schiffer, H. W. Bauer et al., “Discovery and validation of urinary biomarkers for prostate cancer,” Proteomics—Clinical Applications, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 556–570, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Saito, M. Kimoto, T. Araki et al., “Proteome analysis of gelatin-bound urinary proteins from patients with bladder cancers,” European Urology, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 865–871, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. A. Rogers, P. Clarke, J. Noble et al., “Proteomic profiling of urinary proteins in renal cancer by surface enhanced laser desorption ionization and neural-network analysis: identification of key issues affecting potential clinical utility,” Cancer Research, vol. 63, no. 20, pp. 6971–6983, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  15. P. Hudler, M. Gorsic, and R. Komel, “Proteomic strategies and challenges in tumor metastasis research,” Clinical and Experimental Metastasis, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 441–451, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. B. Zethelius, L. Berglund, J. Sundström et al., “Use of multiple biomarkers to improve the prediction of death from cardiovascular causes,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 20, pp. 2107–2116, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. E. F. Petricoin, A. M. Ardekani, B. A. Hitt et al., “Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer,” The Lancet, vol. 359, no. 9306, pp. 572–577, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  18. D. Theodorescu, S. Wittke, M. M. Ross et al., “Discovery and validation of new protein biomarkers for urothelial cancer: a prospective analysis,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 230–240, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. V. Thongboonkerd, N. Songtawee, and S. Sritippayawan, “Urinary proteome profiling using microfluidic technology on a chip,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 2011–2018, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Haubitz, S. Wittke, E. M. Weissinger et al., “Urine protein patterns can serve as diagnostic tools in patients with IgA nephropathy,” Kidney International, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 2313–2320, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. P. Aggarwal, S. Tandon, P. K. Naik, S. K. Singh, and C. Tandon, “Novel antilithiatic cationic proteins from human calcium oxalate renal stone matrix identified by MALDI-TOF-MS endowed with cytoprotective potential: an insight into the molecular mechanism of urolithiasis,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 415, pp. 181–190, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. T. Pacchiarotta, P. J. Hensbergen, M. Wuhrer et al., “Fibrinogen alpha chain O-glycopeptides as possible markers of urinary tract infection,” Journal of Proteomics, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 1067–1073, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. Lei, X. Zhao, S. Jin, Q. Meng, H. Zhou, and M. Zhang, “Discovery of potential bladder cancer biomarkers by comparative urine proteomics and analysis,” Clinical Genitourinary Cancer, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 56–62, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. Krishnamoorthy, A. K. Ajay, D. Hoffmann et al., “Fibrinogen β-derived Bβ15-42 peptide protects against kidney ischemia/reperfusion injury,” Blood, vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 1934–1942, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. F. Drew, H. Liu, J. M. Davidson, C. C. Daugherty, and J. L. Degen, “Wound-healing defects in mice lacking fibrinogen,” Blood, vol. 97, no. 12, pp. 3691–3698, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Sethi, J. A. Vrana, J. D. Theis et al., “Laser microdissection and mass spectrometry-based proteomics aids the diagnosis and typing of renal amyloidosis,” Kidney International, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 226–234, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. Lopez-Hellin, C. Cantarell, L. Jimeno et al., “A form of apolipoprotein a-I is found specifically in relapses of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis following transplantation,” The American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 493–500, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. Glass, R. C. Pittman, M. Civen, and D. Steinberg, “Uptake of high-density lipoprotein-associated apoprotein A-I and cholesterol esters by 16 tissues of the rat in vivo and by adrenal cells and hepatocytes in vitro,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 260, no. 2, pp. 744–750, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  29. S. M. Hammad, J. L. Barth, C. Knaak, and W. S. Argraves, “Megalin acts in concert with cubilin to mediate endocytosis of high density lipoproteins,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 16, pp. 12003–12008, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. R. Kozyraki, J. Fyfe, M. Kristiansen et al., “The intrinsic factor-vitamin B12 receptor, cubilin, is a high-affinity apolipoprotein A-I receptor facilitating endocytosis of high-density lipoprotein,” Nature Medicine, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 656–661, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Wei Zhu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

914 Views | 452 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.