Clinical Study

Posttransplant Allosensitization in Low Immunological Risk Kidney and Kidney-Pancreas Graft Recipients

Table 3

Predictors of censored kidney graft loss by Cox proportional hazard analysis.

Hazard ratio95% IC -value

Univariable analysis
 Recipient age1.051.01–1.080.01
 Male (versus female) recipient0.580.23–1.460.26
 Living (versus deceased) donor0.040.01–5.870.20
 Donor age1.030.99–1.070.07
 Male (versus female) donor0.480.19–1.250.13
 Delayed graft function5.852.30–14.85<0.01
 ATG use0.300.07–1.290.10
 ABDR HLA mismatches >39.391.25–70.600.03
 Time on dialysis ≥48 (versus <48) mo2.050.79–5.280.14
 Acute rejection
  No episodeReference
  Steroid-sensitive1.170.15–8.830.88
  Steroid-insensitive2.020.46–8.860.35
 Kidney-pancreas recipient 0.620.14–2.720.53
 Anti-HLA antibodies at 6 mo after transplant
  NegativeReference
  Class I0.710.09–5.460.74
  Class II4.791.07–21.400.04
  Class I + II10.953.08–38.96<0.01
Multivariable analysis*
 Recipient age1.020.98–1.070.29
 Donor age1.020.98–1.060.45
 ATG use0.440.09–2.060.30
 Delayed graft function6.112.21–16.92<0.01
 ABDR HLA mismatches >310.171.32–78.550.03
 Anti-HLA antibodies at 6 mo after transplant
  NegativeReference
  Class I1.230.15–10.110.85
  Class II5.121.07–24.530.04
  Class I + II13.793.41–55.77<0.01

Variables included in the model are ATG use, recipient age, donor age, delayed graft function, ABDR mismatches, and anti-HLA antibodies screen.
IC: confidence interval; ATG: antithymocyte globulin; mo: months; HLA: human leukocyte antigen.