BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

BIODESERT: Exploring and Exploiting the Microbial Resource of Hot and Cold Deserts

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 439197 |

Atef Jaouani, Mohamed Neifar, Valeria Prigione, Amani Ayari, Imed Sbissi, Sonia Ben Amor, Seifeddine Ben Tekaya, Giovanna Cristina Varese, Ameur Cherif, Maher Gtari, "Diversity and Enzymatic Profiling of Halotolerant Micromycetes from Sebkha El Melah, a Saharan Salt Flat in Southern Tunisia", BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 439197, 11 pages, 2014.

Diversity and Enzymatic Profiling of Halotolerant Micromycetes from Sebkha El Melah, a Saharan Salt Flat in Southern Tunisia

Academic Editor: Sara Borin
Received02 May 2014
Accepted28 Jun 2014
Published16 Jul 2014


Twenty-one moderately halotolerant fungi have been isolated from sample ashes collected from Sebkha El Melah, a Saharan salt flat located in southern Tunisia. Based on morphology and sequence inference from the internal transcribed spacer regions, 28S rRNA gene and other specific genes such as β-tubulin, actin, calmodulin, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, the isolates were found to be distributed over 15 taxa belonging to 6 genera of Ascomycetes: Cladosporium (), Alternaria (), Aspergillus (), Penicillium (), Ulocladium (), and Engyodontium (). Their tolerance to different concentrations of salt in solid and liquid media was examined. Excepting Cladosporium cladosporioides JA18, all isolates were considered as alkali-halotolerant since they were able to grow in media containing 10% of salt with an initial pH 10. All isolates were resistant to oxidative stresses and low temperature whereas 5 strains belonging to Alternaria, Ulocladium, and Aspergillus genera were able to grow at 45°C. The screening of fungal strains for sets of enzyme production, namely, cellulase (CMCase), amylase, protease, lipase, and laccase, in presence of 10% NaCl, showed a variety of extracellular hydrolytic and oxidative profiles. Protease was the most abundant enzyme produced whereas laccase producers were members of the genus Cladosporium.

1. Introduction

Sebkhas are salt flats occurring on arid coastline in North Africa, Arabia, Baja California, and Shark Bay Australia [1]. They are considered among the most poikilotopic environments and characterized by extreme salt concentrations and electromagnetic radiation exposure together with low water and nutrient availabilities [2]. Regarded as detrimental to “normal subsistence,” organisms copying such conditions to survive and thrive are designed extremophiles [3]. Beside halophytes plants and algae, the mostly diverse dwellers of sebkhas being unveiled are members of bacterial, archaeal, and fungal ranks [48]. Members of fungi kingdom recovered from extreme environments such as sebkhas’ have shed light on two promising viewpoints: first, as model for deciphering stress adaptation mechanisms in eukaryotes [9] and secondary, as novel and largely unexplored materials for the screening of novel bioactive natural products [10]. Over the past decade, there is an increased awareness for new hydrolytic enzymes useful under nonconventional conditions [11].

Sebkha El Melah, a Saharan salt flat of southern Tunisia, has an area of approximately 150 km² and the level is slightly below the sea. Fluvial basin excavation of Sebkha El Melah appeared at the beginning of the Würmian Quaternary period [12]. Around 40,000 BP the lagoon was highly desalinated by freshwater arrivals. At the upper Würm, seawater withdrew and the basin evolves to a temporary lake or continental sebkha. More recently, around 8000 years BP, the lagoon evolved into an evaporite basin. The sebkha sediments are composed of several saliferous layers of rock salt and gypsum (calcium sulfate) and/or polyhalite (sulfate of potassium, calcium, and magnesium) [12]. Here we report the isolation of moderately halotolerant fungi from Sebkha El Melah. Strains have been identified based on morphological and molecular markers and their resistance to salt, thermal, alkaline, and oxidative stresses was assessed. Their ability to produce different hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes under salt stress was also evaluated.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Sampling Site Description and Fungal Isolation

Three locations from the Sebkha El Melah margins (L1: 33°23′01.1′′N 10°54′56.8′′E; L2: 33°21′42.1′′N 10°55′05.5′′E; and L3: 33°23′37.7′′N 10°53′40.2′′E) were chosen for sampling (Figure 1). From each location, a composite sample was prepared aseptically from five subsamples (1–10 cm deep) and collected from the arms and center of an X (each arm was 1 m in length) [13]. One cm soil from the ground surface was firstly removed to avoid contamination during sampling procedure. Samples were then transported to the laboratory in a cool box and stored at 4°C prior to processing.

Fungi were isolated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) containing 10% of NaCl and 0.05% of chloramphenicol using the soil plate method where few milligrams of sample were directly spread on the agar medium. This method has a slight edge over the dilution plate method since it allows higher total number of isolates and limits invasion by species which sporulate heavily [14].

2.2. Morphological and Molecular Identification

Isolated fungi were identified conventionally according to their macroscopic and microscopic features. After determination of their genera [1517], they were transferred to the media recommended of selected genus monographs for species identification.

DNA extraction was achieved as described by Liu et al. [18]; the amplification of the internal transcribed spacer regions (nuclear-encoded 18S rRNA-ITS1-5.8S rRNA-ITS2-28S rRNA) was performed using the couple of universal primers ITS1 (5′-TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC-3′) [19] and the thermal cycler conditions according to Luo and Mitchell [20]. PCR was carried out in 25 μL volumes containing 2.5 μL of 1X PCR reaction buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM KCl, pH 8.3), 1.5 μL MgCl2, 0.2 μmol/L (each) primer, 0.2 μmol/L (each) dNTP, and 2.5 units of Taq polymerase (Dream Taq, Fermentas) and 1 μL of DNA template. Depending on the fungus genus, different gene sequences were amplified. For the Aspergillus flavus group, the calmodulin gene was amplified using the primers CL1 (5′-GARTWCAAGGAGGCCTTCTC-3′) and CL2A (5′-TTTTGCATCATGAGTTGGAC-3′) according to Rodrigues et al. [21]; for the Cladosporium genus, the actin gene was amplified using the primers ACT-512F (5′-ATGTGCAAGGCCGGTTTCGC-3′) and ACT-783R (5′-TACGAGTCCTTCTGGCCCAT-3′) according to Bensch et al. [22]; for Alternaria genus, the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene was amplified using the primers GPD1 (5′-CAACGGCTTCGGTCGCATTG-3′) and GPD2 (5′-GCCAAGCAGTTGGTTGTGC-3′) according to Berbee et al. [23]; for Penicillium and Aspergillus genera, the β-tubulin gene was amplified using the primers Bt2a (5′-GGTAACCAAATCGGTGCTGCTTTC-3′) and Bt2B (5′-ACCCTCAGTGTAGTGACCCTTGGC-3′) according to Glass and Donaldson [24].

The PCR products were purified with QIAquick Wizard PCR purification Kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the sequences were determined by cycle sequencing using the Taq Dye Deoxy Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, HTDS, Tunisia) and fragment separation in an ABI PrismTM 3130 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, HTDS, Tunisia). The sequences obtained were compared reference sequences in the NCBI GenBank database using the BLASTN search option [25].

2.3. Effect of pH, Salinity, Temperature, and Oxidative Stress

PDA medium was used to study the effect of different stresses on solid media. For oxidative stresses, H2O2 or paraquat was filter sterilized and added separately to melted PDA medium previously autoclaved. Paraquat is a redox-cycling agent widely used to generate reactive oxygen species and induce oxidative stress in bacteria [26] and fungi [27]. For pH stress, PDA medium was buffered with 100 mM Glycine-NaOH to pH 10 before autoclaving. Salt stress in solid media was studied in PDA medium containing different concentrations of salts. The inoculated plates with 3 mm cylindrical mycelial plugs were then incubated at 30°C for oxidative, salt, and pH stresses and at 4°C and 45°C for thermal stresses, and radial growth was measured daily. Results were expressed as relative growth of fungal strains under different stresses as follows: (Colony diameter under stress/colony diameter without stress after 7 days incubation) 100.

The effect of salinity in liquid medium was carried out in Biolog system, a commercially redox based test (Biolog Inc., Hayward, CA). Malt extracts (2%) containing 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% of salt were inoculated by a suspension of spores and fragmented mycelium according to the supplier’s instructions in 96-well microtiter plates. After 15 days incubation at 30°C, the numeric results were extracted using PM Data Analysis 1.3 software. The fungal growth was assimilated to the reduction of the redox indicator. The ability of the fungus to grow in the presence of salt was expressed as the ratio of kinetic curve surface under stress versus without stress.

2.4. Extracellular Enzymes Production Profiling

The capacity of fungal isolates to produce extracellular enzymes, namely, amylase, cellulase, protease, laccase and lipase, was assayed in the presence of 10% of NaCl. Inoculation was made by transferring 3 mm of cylindrical mycelial plugs on the corresponding media. Amylase production was assayed on PDA containing 1% soluble starch. Enzyme production is shown by the presence of clear halo when iodine was poured onto the plates. Cellulase production was tested on PDA medium containing 1% of carboxymethylcellulose. The presence of activity is reflected by a clear halo on red background after flooding the plates with 0.2% Congo red for 30 min. Protease production was revealed on skim milk agar by the appearance of a clear zone corresponding to casein hydrolysis/solubilization surrounding the microbial colony. The laccase production was detected on PDA medium containing 5 mM of 2,6 dimethoxyphenol (DMP). Oxidation of the substrate is indicated by the appearance of brown color. Lipase production was tested on PDA medium containing 10 mL/L of Tween 20 and 0.1 g/L of CaCl2. Positive reaction is accompanied by the presence of precipitates around the fungal colony. The enzymes production was expressed as activity ratio (PR) which corresponds to the activity diameter (halo of enzymatic reaction) divided by the colony diameter after 7 days incubation at 30°C.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The data presented are the average of the results of at least three replicates with a standard error of less than 10%.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation and Identification of Halotolerant Fungi

Twenty-one fungal isolates were obtained on halophilic medium containing 10% NaCl and subjected to morphological and molecular identification. Seventeen strains were identified at genus level based on 28S rRNA gene sequences, while four were identified based on ITS regions. Final assignment was based on combination of morphological and β-tubulin, actin, calmodulin, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase genes sequencing (Table 1). The 21 strains have been identified as Cladosporium cladosporioides (), Cladosporium halotolerans (), Cladosporium sphaerospermum (), Alternaria tenuissima (), Aspergillus flavus (), Aspergillus fumigatiaffinis (), Aspergillus fumigatus (), Penicillium canescens (), Penicillium chrysogenum (), Penicillium sp. (), Alternaria alternata (), Ulocladium consortiale (), Ulocladium sp. (), Engyodontium album (), and Embellisia phragmospora () species. All the strains have been deposited at the Mycotheca Universitatis Taurinensis (MUT) in the University of Turin.

Strain code28S identificationITS identificationIdentification based on specific primersMorphological identificationFinal identification and accession number in NCBI

JA1Penicillium Penicillium flavigenum JX997105 (100%) 
P. confertum JX997081 (100%) 
P. dipodomyis JX997080 (100%) 
P. commune KC333882 (100%) 
P. chrysogenum KC009827 (100%) 
P. griseofulvum JQ781833 (100%)
Penicillium  chrysogenum
Penicillium  chrysogenum Penicillium  chrysogenum Thom 
28S KF417559
ITS KF417577

JA2Cladosporium Cladosporium sp. GU017498 (100%) 
Hyalodendron sp. AM176721 (100%) 
C. sphaerospermum AB572902 (99%) 
C. cladosporioides EF568045 (99%)
Cladosporium  sphaerospermum (Actin)nd Cladosporium sphaerospermum Penzig 
28S: KF417560
ITS: KF417578

JA3Penicillium chrysogenum Penicillium canescens HQ607858(99%)Penicillium  chrysogenum
Penicillium  chrysogenum Penicillium  chrysogenum Thom 
28S: KF417561
ITS: KF417579

JA4Aspergillus Aspergillus aureofulgens EF669617 (100%)Aspergillus flavus
nd Aspergillus flavus Link
28S: KF417562
ITS: KF417580

JA5 nd Penicillium desertorum JX997039 (100%) 
P. chrysogenum KC009826 (99%)
Penicillium canescens group
(β-tubulin and calmodulin)
nd Penicillium canescens Sopp 
ITS: KF417581

JA6Alternaria Alternaria triticimaculans JN867470 (100%) 
A. tenuissima JN867469 (100%) 
A. mali JN867468 (100%) 
A. alternata JQ690087 (100%)
Alternaria tenuissima
Alternaria alternata Alternaria tenuissima (Nees)  
28S: KF417563
ITS: KF417582

JA7nd Engyodontium album HM214540 (100%)Engyodontium  album Engyodontium album (Limber) de Hoog 
ITS: KF417583

JA8Cladosporium Cladosporium cladosporioides EF568045 (100%) 
C. sphaerospermum AM176719 (100%) 
C. halotolerans JX535318 (99%)
Cladosporium halotolerans
Cladosporium  cladosporioides/halotolerans Cladosporium halotolerans Zalar, de Hoog, and Gunde-Cimerman 
28S: KF417564
ITS: KF417584

JA9Embellisia/Chalastospora Embellisia phragmospora JN383493 (100%)Alternaria tenuissima similarity
Alternaria arborescens
Alternaria alternata (GPD)
Embellisia  phragmospora Embellisia phragmospora (Emden) E.G.  
28S: KF417565
ITS: KF417585

JA10Aspergillus Aspergillus lentulus JN943567 (99%) 
A. aff. fumigatus JN246066 (99%) 
A. fumigatiaffinis HF545316 (99%) 
A. novofumigatus FR733874 (99%)
Aspergillus fumigatus
Aspergillus fumigatiaffinis Aspergillus fumigatus Fresenius 
28S: KF417566
ITS: KF417586

JA11nd Aspergillus aff. fumigatus JN246066 (100%) 
A. fumigatiaffinis KC253955 (99%)
Aspergillus fumigatiaffinis
nd Aspergillus fumigatiaffinis Hong, Frisvad, and Samson 
ITS: KF417587

JA12Ulocladium Ulocladium consortiale JQ585682 (100%) 
Alternaria radicina HM204457 (99%)
Ulocladium consortiale (GPD)Ulocladium tuberculatum/consortiale Ulocladium consortiale (Thümen) E.G. Simmons 
28S: KF417567
ITS: KF417588

JA13Cladosporium Cladosporium cladosporioides JX868638 (99%) 
C. sphaerospermum HM999943 (99%)
Cladosporium  sphaerospermum group 
Cladosporium  sphaerospermum Cladosporium sphaerospermum Penzig 
28S: KF417568
ITS: KF417589

JA14Cladosporium/Davidiella Cladosporium cladosporioides KC009539 (99%) 
Davidiella tassiana GU248332 (98%)
nd nd Cladosporium cladosporioides (Fresenius) G.A. de Vries 
28S: KF417569
ITS: KF417590

JA15Penicillium Penicillium spinulosum KC167852 (100%) 
P. glabrum KC009784 (100%)
nd Penicillium glabrum Penicillium sp.  
28S: KF417570
ITS: KF417591

JA17Ulocladium Ulocladium consortiale JQ585682 (100%) 
U. chartarum JN942881 (99%)
nd Ulocladium sp.Ulocladium sp.  
28S: KF417572
ITS: KF417593

JA18Cladosporium Cladosporium cladosporioides HQ380770 (100%)nd Cladosporium cladosporioides Cladosporium cladosporioides (Fresenius) G.A. de Vries 
28S: KF417573
ITS: KF417594

JA19Alternaria Alternaria sp. KC139473 (100%) 
A. arborescens JQ781762 (100%) 
A. alternata JN107734 (100%)
Alternaria tenuissima
Alternaria arborescens
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata Alternaria alternata Keissler 
28S: KF417574
ITS: KF417595

JA20Alternaria Alternaria brassicae JX290150 (100%) 
A. porri HQ821479 (100%)
Alternaria tenuissima
Alternaria arborescens
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata Alternaria alternata Keissler 
28S: KF417575
ITS: KF417596

JA22Penicillium Penicillium chrysogenum KC341721 (99%) 
P. dipodomyicola JX232278 (99%) 
P. rubens JX003126 (99%) 
P. commune JN676122 (99%)
Penicillium  chrysogenum
Penicillium  chrysogenum Penicillium  chrysogenum Thom 
28S: KF417576
ITS: KF417597

JA23nd Alternaria alternata JQ809324 (100%) 
A. quercus KC329620 (100%) 
A. tenuissima KC329619 (100%) 
A. atrans KC329618 (100%)
Alternaria tenuissima
Alternaria arborescens
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata Alternaria alternata Keissler 
ITS: KF417598

3.2. Salt Tolerance of Fungal Isolates

Salt tolerance of the fungal isolates was assessed on solid and liquid media for NaCl content ranging from 5 to 20%. In solid media, salt tolerance was estimated as relative growth represented by the ratio of colony diameter under salt stress to that without salt stress. As illustrated in Table 2, all the isolated strains succeeded to grow in the presence of 10% of salt. While 19 isolates remain able to grow under 15% NaCl, only 7 isolates tolerated 20% NaCl: Penicillium chrysogenum JA1 and JA22, Cladosporium halotolerans JA8, Cladosporium sphaerospermum JA2, Cladosporium cladosporioides JA18, Aspergillus flavus JA4, and Engyodontium album JA7.

Strain codeStrainSolid media (1)Liquid media (2)
5% NaCl10% NaCl15% NaCl20% NaCl5% NaCl10% NaCl15% NaCl20% NaCl

JA1Penicillium  chrysogenum 747260188354100
JA3Penicillium  chrysogenum 100723709646110
JA22Penicillium  chrysogenum 100824125904600
AJ5Penicillium canescens 7030200794400
JA15Penicillium sp. 8370340531800
JA8Cladosporium halotolerans 8068321830000
JA2Cladosporium  sphaerospermum 766434224719110
JA13Cladosporium sphaerospermum 100492508179120
JA14Cladosporium cladosporioides 40301000000
JA18Cladosporium cladosporioides 5840248636140
JA4Aspergillus flavus 90804826561600
JA10Aspergillus fumigatus 1007635010057110
JA11Aspergillus fumigatiaffinis 100462505230120
JA19Alternaria alternata 523824057900
JA20Alternaria alternata 604000372400
JA23Alternaria alternata 10068200651200
JA6Alternaria tenuissima 100602208055170
JA9Embellisia phragmospora 9450100782600
JA12Ulocladium consortiale 722800321000
JA17Ulocladium sp.10070280672000
JA7Engyodontium album 56361410431000

(1) Relative growth on solid media after 7 days incubation = (⌀ colony under salt stress/⌀ colony without salt stress) × 100. (2) Relative growth in liquid media after 7 days incubation = (kinetic curve surface under salt stress/kinetic curve surface without salt stress) × 100.

When liquid cultures were used, fungal isolates seemed to become more sensitive to salt stress. Indeed, none of the strains was able to grow in the presence of 20% NaCl, whereas only 8 strains and 19 strains tolerated 15% and 10% NaCl, respectively (Table 2).

3.3. Alkaline, Temperature, and Oxidative Stress

Excepting Cladosporium cladosporioides JA18, all tested strains were able to grow at pH 10. All isolates were able to grow at 4°C while only five strains Aspergillus fumigatus JA10, Aspergillus fumigatiaffinis JA11, Alternaria alternata JA23, Ulocladium consortiale JA12, and Ulocladium sp. JA17 showed a significant growth at 45°C. All 21 strains tolerated oxidative stress generated by 10 mM H2O2 and 500 μM paraquat (Table 3).

Strain codeStrainAlkaline stress (1)Thermal stress (2)Oxidative stress (3)
pH 104°C45°CH2O2   10 mM Paraquat 500 µM

JA1Penicillium  chrysogenum 43396674
JA3Penicillium  chrysogenum 42508471
JA22Penicillium  chrysogenum 47456853
JA5Penicillium canescens 26285963
JA15Penicillium sp. 43100100100
JA8Cladosporium halotolerans 34264440
JA2Cladosporium  sphaerospermum 21245248
JA13Cladosporium sphaerospermum 21435544
JA14Cladosporium cladosporioides 34382031
JA18Cladosporium cladosporioides 411816
JA4Aspergillus flavus 46224739
JA10Aspergillus fumigatus 894161100100
JA11Aspergillus fumigatiaffinis 9426100100100
JA19Alternaria alternata 49356989
JA20Alternaria alternata 5848100100
JA23Alternaria alternata 10083405752
JA6Alternaria tenuissima 573081100
JA9Embellisia phragmospora 5867100100
JA12Ulocladium consortiale 44373656100
JA17Ulocladium sp. 932810081100
JA7Engyodontium album 34186653

Relative growth of fungal strains under different stresses after 7 days incubation was expressed as follows: (1) (⌀ colony at pH 10/⌀ colony at pH 5) × 100; (2) (⌀ colony at 45°C or 4°C/⌀ colony at 30°C) × 100; (3) (⌀ colony with H2O2 or paraquat/⌀ colony without stress) × 100. —: not significant growth.
3.4. Enzymatic Profiling of Isolates

Among the 21 strains tested, 13 strains displayed at least one of the five-screened activities: protease, amylase, cellulase, lipase, and laccase, in the presence of 10% NaCl (Table 4). Protease and amylase were the most abundant activities shown by 9 and 6 strains, respectively. Four strains belonging to Cladosporium and Penicillium genera produced laccase while Cladosporium sphaerospermum JA2, Aspergillus flavus JA4, and Engyodontium album JA7 were able to produce lipase. Cellulase activity was detected only in Penicillium sp. JA15.

Strain codeStrainProteaseAmylaseCellulaseLipaseLaccase

JA1Penicillium  chrysogenum +++
JA3Penicillium  chrysogenum ++
JA22Penicillium  chrysogenum ++
AJ5Penicillium canescens +
JA15Penicillium sp. +
JA8Cladosporium halotolerans ++
JA2Cladosporium  sphaerospermum +++++
JA13Cladosporium sphaerospermum ++
JA14Cladosporium cladosporioides ++
JA18Cladosporium cladosporioides
JA4Aspergillus flavus ++
JA10Aspergillus fumigatus
JA11Aspergillus fumigatiaffinis
JA19Alternaria alternata
JA20Alternaria alternata +
JA23Alternaria alternata
JA6Alternaria tenuissima +
JA9Embellisia phragmospora
JA12Ulocladium consortiale
JA17Ulocladium sp.
JA7Engyodontium album ++++

AR: activity ratio = (⌀ activity/⌀ colony). −: no activity; +: AR < 1; ++: 1 < AR < 2; +++: 2 < AR < 3.

4. Discussion

With regard to bacteria that have been well explored in southern desert region of Tunisia [2831], data related to fungi are scarce and are limited to truffle and mycorrhiza, so far considered as real specialists of desert environments [32, 33]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the isolation and characterization of fungi from Tunisian desert and particularly from salt flat. A collection of 21 fungi isolates have been established from samples ashes collected from Sebkha El Melah. These alkalihalotolerant fungi have been assigned to 15 taxa belonging to 6 genera of Ascomycetes. Several studies showed that fungi belonging to Cladosporium, Alternaria, and Ulocladium genera were clearly predominant under desert and salty environments [34, 35]. These fungi have in common thick-walled and strongly melanized spores which are important for UV, radiation, and desiccation tolerance [10]. On the other hand, Molitoris et al. [36] reported that other halotolerant and halophilic fungi such as Aspergillus and Cladosporium spp. are predominant in saline desert soil of Dead Sea. Many Aspergillus species have been also reported to constitute dominant fungi in desert of Saudi Arabia and Libya [37, 38], and halotolerant species, including Aspergillus spp., Penicillium spp., and Cladosporium sphaerospermum, have been consistently isolated from hypersaline environments around the globe [39]. In this study, contrary to many reports on hypersaline environments, no species belonging to the genera Eurotium, Thrimmatostroma, Emericella, and Phaeotheca [9] have been obtained, probably because of the initial alkaline pH of the Sebkha El Melah salt lake. Actually, the effect of pH on the fungal diversity is controversial. Misra [40] observed that fungal diversity varies with the pH while other investigators found no significant effect of pH values of water and soil habitats on fungal occurrence [41]. It is more likely that the number of the isolated fungi is directly correlated to the organic matter content of water, mud, and soil samples [42].

Beside the identification of the recovered fungal isolates from Sebkha El Melah, the second goal of the current study was the detection of some of their physiological and biochemical features. This allows understanding ecological adaptation to extreme environment and predicts some biotechnological usage. The 21 strains have been screened for tolerance to extreme NaCl concentrations, basic pH, temperature, and oxidative stress and for the production of important enzymatic activities in presence of 10% NaCl.

Excepting Cladosporium cladosporioides JA18, all isolates obtained in this study can be considered as moderately haloalkaliphilic fungi as deduced from their ability to grow at pH 10 and 10% of NaCl. However, the isolates were able to grow when salt was not added to their growing media. Excepting some Wallemia ichthyophaga the most strictly halophilic fungus [43], all other fungal strains known to date are able to grow without salt, a fact confirmed in our study. However, gradual decrease in fungal growth was observed with the increasing of salt concentration in the culture medium. Nineteen strains remain able to grow under 15% of NaCl, whereas 7 strains were able to tolerate 20% of NaCl. This result was confirmed by salt tolerance assay in liquid media as estimated by Biolog system. It is noteworthy that fungi were more sensitive to salt stress in liquid media than in solid media. This could be explained by the alteration of the osmotic gradient, forcing the fungi to expend more energy in the osmoregulatory processes, resulting in slower growth [44]. Moreover, at higher salt concentration death occurs.

Regarding the stress of pH, the capacity of the majority of isolates to growth at pH 10 implies firstly that some habitats in the salt lake may have a varying pH and secondly that fungi can tolerate a wide pH range. Prima facie, the overall results in solid and liquid media showed that Penicillium chrysogenum JA1 and JA3, Cladosporium sphaerospermum JA2 and JA13, Cladosporium cladosporioides JA18, Aspergillus fumigatus JA10, Aspergillus fumigatiaffinis JA11, and Alternaria tenuissima JA6 are the most alkalihalotolerant isolates in this study.

The tolerance of the strains to extreme 45°C was tested and results indicated that Aspergillus fumigatus JA10, Alternaria alternata JA23, Ulocladium sp. JA17, and Aspergillus fumigatiaffinis JA11 were able to grow. Of particular interest, the latter two strains retained 100% of the growth rate and biomass production as estimated by colony diameter. Moreover, their ability to grow at low temperature may allow them to better adapt to the big temperature fluctuation in desert environments. Additionally, exposure to substrates generating oxidative stress such as H2O2 at 10 mM and paraquat at 500 μM did not alter significantly the growth of almost tested strains demonstrating their ability to tolerate oxidative stress. These findings may explain their presence in desert regions that are considered amongst the most stressful environments on Earth because of the high UV radiation, desiccation, increased salinity, low nutrient availability, seasonal and daily temperature variation, and solar irradiation [6, 10].

It has been postulated that microorganisms sharing a rich and particular extracellular enzymatic activities are common in harsh conditions characterizing their ecological habitat including high level of aridity, temperature, ionic strength, and particularly the low nutrient availability [31]. This implies the need by microorganisms for an effective utilization of each possible available organic compound [45]. Moreover, fungal isolates from hot desert were revealed to play an important role in seeds germination by breaking dormancy and increasing water uptake [46]. In the present study, the capacity of fungal isolates to produce extracellular enzymes was assayed in the presence of 10% of NaCl. Enzymes tested were the following: amylase for degradation of starch, abundant carbohydrate polymer in many plant tissues; protease for degradation of plant and animal proteins; cellulase which hydrolyses the cellulose, the main component of wood, ubiquitous substrate for fungi; and finally the laccase involved in plant material delignification and in the synthesis of the melanin and related compounds to protect fungi against radiation. Thirteen strains displayed high productions at least for one of the five-screened activities while no clear correlation of enzyme production profile with fungal systematic groups was noted. The abundance of protease activity is in line with previous data on fungal isolates from extreme environments showing high caseinase activities with little effect of salinity and temperature on enzyme production [36]. The relative limited number of isolates displaying cellulase, amylase, lipase, and laccase activities suggests that high concentration of salt may have an adverse effect on enzyme production and/or activity. Their energy was probably oriented to avoid salt stress due to 10% NaCl rather than the production of bioactive extrolites [47]. However, not detecting the enzyme is not absolute confirmation of an isolate inability to produce it. It could also mean that the enzyme was not released from the mycelium or that the medium is inadequate for its detection [48]. Laccase production in the presence of 10% of salt by the Cladosporium group may be of biotechnological interest, for example, in mycoremediation of high salty environments contaminated by organic pollutants.

In conclusion, fungal community described in this study was similar to those reported in inhospitable habitats characterized by limitation of nutrients, moisture deficit, and exposure to high solar radiation. Further studies are needed in order to elucidate their biogeochemical roles in such an extreme environment and to exploit their promising potential to produce new biomolecules such as enzymes and protective agents against oxidative stress.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors acknowledge the financial support from the European Union in the ambit of the Project BIODESERT (EU FP7-CSA-SA REGPOT-2008-2, Grant agreement no. 245746) and the Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in the ambit of the laboratory Project LR MBA20. Atef Jaouani wants to thank the Tunisian Society for Microbial Ecology (ATEM) for supporting publication fees of this work.


  1. J. K. Warren, “Sabkhas, saline mudflats and pans,” in Evaporites: Sediments, Resources and Hydrocarbons, pp. 139–220, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. A. Gorbushina and W. E. Krumbein, “Rock dwelling fungal communities: diversity of life styles and colony structure,” in Journey to Diverse Microbial Worlds, J. Seckbach, Ed., pp. 317–334, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  3. L. J. Rothschild and R. L. Mancinelli, “Life in extreme environments,” Nature, vol. 409, no. 6823, pp. 1092–1101, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. B. Humayoun, N. Bano, and J. T. Hollibaugh, “Depth distribution of microbial diversity in mono lake, a meromictic soda lake in California,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 1030–1042, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. Demergasso, E. O. Casamayor, G. Chong, P. Galleguillos, L. Escudero, and C. Pedrós-Alió, “Distribution of prokaryotic genetic diversity in athalassohaline lakes of the Atacama Desert, Northern Chile,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 57–69, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. N. Gunde-Cimerman, A. Oren, and A. Plemenitaš, “Adaptation to life in high salt concentrations,” in Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya, p. 576, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  7. L. Maturrano, F. Santos, R. Rosselló-Mora, and J. Antón, “Microbial diversity in Maras salterns, a hypersaline environment in the Peruvian Andes,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 3887–3895, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Q. Wu, G. Zwart, M. Schauer, M. Kamst-van Agterveld, and M. Hahn, “Bacterioplankton community composition along a salinity gradient of sixteen high-mountain lakes located on the Tibetan Plateau, China,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 5478–5485, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Gostinčar, M. Grube, S. De Hoog, P. Zalar, and N. Gunde-Cimerman, “Extremotolerance in fungi: evolution on the edge,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 2–11, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Sterflinger, D. Tesei, and K. Zakharova, “Fungi in hot and cold deserts with particular reference to microcolonial fungi,” Fungal Ecology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 453–462, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. J. Liszka, M. E. Clark, E. Schneider, and D. S. Clark, “Nature versus nurture: developing enzymes that function under extreme conditions,” Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 77–102, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. P. Perthuisot, La Sebkha El Melah de Zarzis: genèse et évolution d'un bassin salin paralique; Les gisements néolithiques des abords de la Sebkha el Melah, vol. 9 of de Travaux du Laboratoire de géologie/École normale supérieure, École Normale Supérieure, 1975.
  13. I. cLellan, A. Varela, M. Blahgen et al., “Harmonisation of physical and chemical methods for soil management in Cork Oak forests—lessons from collaborative investigations,” African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 386–401, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  14. J. H. Warcup, “The soil-plate method for isolation of fungi from soil,” Nature, vol. 166, no. 4211, pp. 117–118, 1950. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. H. Domsch, W. Gams, and T. H. Anderson, Compendium of Soil Fungi, Academic Press, London, UK, 1980.
  16. J. A. von Arx, The Genera of Fungi Sporulating in Pure Culture, J. Cramer, Vaduz, Germany, 1981.
  17. E. Kiffer and M. Morelet, Les deutéromycètes: Classification et clés d'identification gènérique, INRA Editions, Paris, France, 1997.
  18. D. Liu, S. Coloe, R. Baird, and J. Pedersen, “Rapid mini-preparation of fungal DNA for PCR,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 38, no. 1, article 471, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  19. T. J. White, T. Bruns, S. Lee, and J. Talor, “Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics,” in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, M. A. Innes, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White, Eds., pp. 315–322, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  20. G. Luo and T. G. Mitchell, “Rapid identification of pathogenic fungi directly from cultures by using multiplex PCR,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 2860–2865, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. Rodrigues, C. Santos, A. Venâncio, and N. Lima, “Species identification of Aspergillus section Flavi isolates from Portuguese almonds using phenotypic, including MALDI-TOF ICMS, and molecular approaches,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 877–892, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. K. Bensch, U. Braun, J. Z. Groenewald, and P. W. Crous, “The genus cladosporium,” Studies in Mycology, vol. 72, pp. 1–401, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. L. Berbee, M. Pirseyedi, and S. Hubbard, “Cochliobolus phylogenetics and the origin of known, highly virulent pathogens, inferred from ITS and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene sequences,” Mycologia, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 964–977, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. N. L. Glass and G. C. Donaldson, “Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous Ascomycetes,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1323–1330, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  25. S. F. Altschul, W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman, “Basic local alignment search tool,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 215, no. 3, pp. 403–410, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. H. M. Hassan and I. Fridovich, “Paraquat and Escherichia coli. Mechanism of production of extracellular superoxide radical,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 254, no. 21, pp. 10846–10852, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  27. M. B. Angelova, S. B. Pashova, B. K. Spasova, S. V. Vassilev, and L. S. Slokoska, “Oxidative stress response of filamentous fungi induced by hydrogen peroxide and paraquat,” Mycological Research, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 150–158, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. de Groot, V. Chapon, P. Servant et al., “Deinococcus deserti sp. nov., a gamma-radiation-tolerant bacterium isolated from the Sahara Desert,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2441–2446, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. Chanal, V. Chapon, K. Benzerara et al., “The desert of Tataouine: an extreme environment that hosts a wide diversity of microorganisms and radiotolerant bacteria,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 514–525, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. Gtari, D. Daffonchio, and A. Boudabous, “Assessment of the genetic diversity of Frankia microsymbionts of Elaeagnus angustifolia L. plants growing in a Tunisian date-palm oasis by analysis of PCR amplified nifD-K intergenic spacer,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 440–445, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. I. Essoussi, F. Ghodhbane-Gtari, H. Amairi et al., “Esterase as an enzymatic signature of Geodermatophilaceae adaptability to Sahara desert stones and monuments,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 1723–1732, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. I. Sbissi, M. Neffati, A. Boudabous, C. Murat, and M. Gtari, “Phylogenetic affiliation of the desert truffles Picoa juniperi and Picoa lefebvrei,” Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 429–436, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. I. Sbissi, F. Ghodhbane-Gtari, M. Neffati, H. Ouzari, A. Boudabous, and M. Gtari, “Diversity of the desert truffle Terfezia boudieri chatin in southern Tunisia,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 599–605, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. C. A. Conley, G. Ishkhanova, C. P. McKay, and K. Cullings, “A preliminary survey of non-lichenized fungi cultured from the hyperarid Atacama Desert of Chile,” Astrobiology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 521–526, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. E. V. Smolyanyuk and E. N. Bilanenko, “Communities of halotolerant micromycetes from the areas of natural salinity,” Microbiology, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 877–883, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. H. P. Molitoris, A. S. Buchalo, I. Kurchenko et al., “Physiological diversity of the fIrst fIlamentous fungi isolated from the hypersaline Dead Sea,” in Aquatic Mycology Across the Millennium, K. D. Hyde, W. H. Ho, and S. B. Pointing, Eds., vol. 5, pp. 55–70, Fungal Diversity Press, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  37. S. I. I. Abdel-Hafez, “Survey of the mycoflora of desert soils in Saudi Arabia,” Mycopathologia, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 3–8, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. H. M. El-Said and A. Saleem, “Ecological and physiological studies on soil fungi at Western Region, Libya,” Mycobiology, vol. 36, pp. 1–9, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  39. P. Zalar, G. S. de Hoog, H.-J. Schroers, P. W. Crous, J. Z. Groenewald, and N. Gunde-Cimerman, “Phylogeny and ecology of the ubiquitous saprobe Cladosporium sphaerospermum, with descriptions of seven new species from hypersaline environments,” Studies in Mycology, vol. 58, pp. 157–183, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. K. Misra, “Occurrence, distribution and seasonality of aquatic fungi as affected by chemical factors in six alkaline ponds of India,” Hydrobiologia, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 185–191, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. F. T. El-Hissy, S. A. El-Zayat, A. M. Khallil, and M. S. Massoud, “Aquatic fungi from the submerged mud of Aswan High Dam Lake,” Microbiological Research, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. M. Khallil, F. T. El-Hissy, and E. H. Ali, “Seasonal fluctuations of aquatic fungi recovered from Egyptian soil (Delta Region),” Journal of Basic Microbiology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 93–102, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. P. B. Matheny, J. A. Gossmann, P. Zalar, T. K. A. Kumar, and D. S. Hibbett, “Resolving the phylogenetic position of the Wallemiomycetes: an enigmatic major lineage of Basidiomycota,” Canadian Journal of Botany, vol. 84, no. 12, pp. 1794–1805, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. A. Blomberg and L. Adler, “Tolerence of fungi to NaCl,” in Stress Tolerance of Fungi, D. Jennings, Ed., pp. 209–231, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  45. A. Oren, “Bioenergetic aspects of halophilism,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 334–348, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  46. P. Delgado-Sánchez, M. A. Ortega-Amaro, J. F. Jiménez-Bremont, and J. Flores, “Are fungi important for breaking seed dormancy in desert species? Experimental evidence in Opuntia streptacantha (Cactaceae),” Plant Biology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 154–159, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. J. C. Frisvad, “Halotolerant and halophilic fungi and their extrolite production,” in Adaptation to Life at High Salt Concentrations in Archaea , Bacteria and Eukarya, N. Gunde-Cimerman, A. Oren, and A. Plemenitaš, Eds., pp. 426–440, Springer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  48. A. Abdel-Raheem and C. A. Shearer, “Extracellular enzyme production by freshwater ascomycetes,” Fungal Diversity, vol. 11, pp. 1–19, 2002. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Atef Jaouani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.