Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 453707, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/453707
Research Article

Systemic Control of Cell Division and Endoreduplication by NAA and BAP by Modulating CDKs in Root Tip Cells of Allium cepa

Department of Biosciences, Centre for Advanced Studies in Plant Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Saurashtra University, Rajkot Gujarat 360 005, India

Received 7 February 2014; Revised 1 April 2014; Accepted 16 April 2014; Published 18 May 2014

Academic Editor: Eric W. Lam

Copyright © 2014 Jigna G. Tank and Vrinda S. Thaker. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Jasinski, C. Riou-Khamlichi, O. Roche, C. Perennes, C. Bergounioux, and N. Glab, “The CDK inhibitor NtKIS1a is involved in plant development, endoreduplication and restores normal development of cyclin D3;1-overexpressing plants,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 973–982, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Lammens, V. Boudolf, L. Kheibarshekan et al., “Atypical E2F activity restrains APC/CCCS52A2 function obligatory for endocycle onset,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 38, pp. 14721–14726, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. D. L. P. Sanchez, E. Caro, B. Desvoyes, E. Ramirez-Parra, and C. Gutierrez, “Chromatin dynamics during the plant cell cycle,” Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 537–546, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Nieuwland, S. Scofield, and J. A. H. Murray, “Control of division and differentiation of plant stem cells and their derivatives,” Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1134–1142, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. Tominaga, M. Iwata, R. Sano, K. Inoue, K. Okada, and T. Wada, “Arabidopsis CAPRICE-LIKE MYB 3 (CPL3) controls endoreduplication and flowering development in addition to trichome and root hair formation,” Development, vol. 135, no. 7, pp. 1335–1345, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. A. Larkins, B. P. Dilkes, R. A. Dante, C. M. Coelho, Y.-M. Woo, and Y. Liu, “Investigating the hows and whys of DNA endoreduplication,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 52, no. 355, pp. 183–192, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Jakoby and A. Schnittger, “Cell cycle and differentiation,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 661–669, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. O. Lee, J. M. Davidson, and R. J. Duronio, “Endoreplication: polyploidy with purpose,” Genes and Development, vol. 23, no. 21, pp. 2461–2477, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Gendreau, H. Höfte, O. Grandjean, S. Brown, and J. Traas, “Phytochrome controls the number of endoreduplication cycles in the Arabidopsis thaliana hypocotyl,” The Plant Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 221–230, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Hülskamp, S. Misera, and G. Jürgens :, “Genetic dissection of trichome development in Arabidopsis,” Cell, vol. 76, pp. 555–566, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J. E. Melaragno, B. Mehrotra, and A. W. Coleman, “Relationship between endopolyploidy and cell size in epidermal tissue of Arabidopsis,” The Plant Cell, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 1661–1668, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. V. Kowles, M. D. McMullen, G. Yerk, R. L. Phillips, S. Kraemer, and F. Srienc, “Endosperm mitotic activity and endoreduplication in maize affected by defective kernel mutations,” Genome, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 68–77, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Inzé and L. de Veylder, “Cell cycle regulation in plant development,” Annual Review of Genetics, vol. 40, pp. 77–105, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. T. S. Beemster, K. de Vusser, E. de Tavernier, K. de Bock, and D. Inzé, “Variation in growth rate between Arabidopsis ecotypes is correlated with cell division and a-type cyclin-dependent kinase activity,” Plant Physiology, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 854–864, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Wolff, L. Knipling, and D. L. Sackett, “Charge shielding and the “paradoxical” stimulation of tubulin polymerization by guanidine hydrochloride,” Biochemistry, vol. 35, pp. 5910–5920, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. E. Screpanti, S. Santaguida, T. Nguyen et al., “A screen for kinetochore-microtubule interaction inhibitors identifies novel antitubulin compounds,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 7, Article ID e11603, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. D. Caperta, M. Delgado, F. Ressurreição et al., “Colchicine-induced polyploidization depends on tubulin polymerization in c-metaphase cells,” Protoplasma, vol. 227, no. 2–4, pp. 147–153, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Weingartner, P. Binarova, D. Drykova et al., “Dynamic recruitment of Cdc2 to specific microtubule structures during mitosis,” The Plant Cell, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1929–1943, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. C. Sadhan and G. Sibdas, “Monoclonal antibody raised against human mitotic cyclin B1, identifies cyclin B-like mitotic proteins in synchronized onion (Allium cepa L.) root meristem,” Cell Biology International, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 159–166, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Yamaguchi, H. Kato, S. Yoshida, S. Yamamura, H. Uchimiya, and M. Umeda, “Control of in vitro organogenesis by cyclin-dependent kinase activities in plants,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 13, pp. 8019–8023, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. T. Pasternak, P. Miskolczi, F. Ayaydin, T. Mészáros, D. Dudits, and A. Fehér, “Exogenous auxin and cytokinin dependent activation of CDKs and cell division in leaf protoplast-derived cells of alfalfa,” Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 32, no. 2-3, pp. 129–141, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. Haberer and J. J. Kieber, “Cytokinins. New insights into a classic phytohormone,” Plant Physiology, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 354–362, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. H. Stals and D. Inzé, “When plant cells decide to divide,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 359–364, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Pines, “Cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases: a biochemical view,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 308, no. 3, pp. 697–711, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. G. Tank and V. S. Thaker, “Changes in DNA and RNA level with endoreduplication can be determined using α-naphthyl red dye,” Cibtech Journal of Bio-Protocols, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  26. M. Umeda, A. Shimotohno, and M. Yamaguchi, “Control of cell division and transcription by cyclin-dependent kinase-activating kinases in plants,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1437–1442, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Joubès, C. Chevalier, D. Dudits et al., “CDK-related protein kinases in plants,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 43, no. 5-6, pp. 607–620, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Joubès, M. Lemaire-Chamley, F. Delmas et al., “A new C-type cyclin-dependent kinase from tomato expressed in dividing tissues does not interact with mitotic and G1 cyclins,” Plant Physiology, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 1403–1415, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. Colasanti, M. Tyers, and V. Sundaresan, “Isolation and characterization of cDNA clones encoding a functional p34(cdc2) homologue from Zea mays,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 3377–3381, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. G.-H. Miao, Z. Hong, and D. P. S. Verma, “Two functional soybean genes encoding p34(cdc2) protein kinases are regulated by different plant developmental pathways,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 943–947, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. Francis and D. A. Sorrell, “The interface between the cell cycle and plant growth regulators: a mini review,” Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. V. Mironov, L. de Veylder, M. van Montagu, and D. Inzé, “Cyclin-dependent kinases and cell division in plants—the nexus,” The Plant Cell, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 509–521, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. K. Zhiponova, A. Pettkó-Szandtner, É. Stelkovics et al., “Mitosis-specific promoter of the alfalfa cyclin-dependent kinase gene (Medsa;CDKB2;1) is activated by wounding and ethylene in a non-cell division-dependent manner,” Plant Physiology, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 693–703, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. Kono, C. Umeda-Hara, J. Lee, M. Ito, H. Uchimiya, and M. Umeda, “Arabidopsis D-type cyclin CYCD4;1 is a novel cyclin partner of B2-type cyclin-dependent kinase,” Plant Physiology, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 1315–1321, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. T. Meszaros, P. Miskolczi, F. Ayaydin et al., “Multiple cyclin-dependent kinase complexes and phosphatases control G2/M progression in alfalfa cells,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 43, no. 5-6, pp. 595–605, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. H. Takatsuka, R. Ohno, and M. Umeda, “The Arabidopsis cyclin-dependent kinase-activating kinase CDKF;1 is a major regulator of cell proliferation and cell expansion but is dispensable for CDKA activation,” The Plant Journal, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 475–487, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. T. Fabian-Marwedel, M. Umeda, and M. Sauter, “The rice cyclin-dependent kinase-activating kinase R2 regulates S-phase progression,” The Plant Cell, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 197–210, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. H. Hirt, A. Páy, L. Bögre, I. Meskiene, and E. Heberle-Bors, “Cdc2MsB, a cognate cdc2 gene from alfalfa, complements the G1/S but not the G2/M transition of budding yeast cdc28 mutants,” The Plant Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 61–69, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. Umeda, C. Umeda-Hara, M. Yamaguchi, J. Hashimoto, and H. Uchimiya, “Differential expression of genes for cyclin-dependent protein kinases in rice plants,” Plant Physiology, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. A. Carle, G. W. Bates, and T. A. Shannon, “Hormonal control of gene expression during reactivation of the cell cycle in tobacco mesophyll protoplasts,” Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 221–230, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. T. Kapros, L. Bögre, K. Németh et al., “Differential expression of histone H3 gene variants during cell cycle and somatic embryogenesis in alfalfa,” Plant Physiology, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 621–625, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. R. Soni, J. P. Carmichael, Z. H. Shah, and J. A. Murray, “A family of cyclin D homologs from plants differentially controlled by growth regulators and containing the conserved retinoblastoma protein interaction motif,” The Plant Cell, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 85–103, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. R. Dello Ioio, K. Nakamura, L. Moubayidin et al., “A genetic framework for the control of cell division and differentiation in the root meristem,” Science, vol. 322, no. 5906, pp. 1380–1384, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. C. Perrot-Rechenmann, “Cellular responses to auxin: division versus expansion,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, vol. 2, no. 5, Article ID a001446, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. G. Maheshwari and L. D. Nooden, “A requirement for DNA synthesis during auxin induction of cell enlargement in tobacco pith tissue,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 282–287, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. A.-H. Quélo, J. A. Bryant, and J.-P. Verbelen, “Endoreduplication is not inhibited but induced by aphidicolin in cultured cells of tobacco,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 53, no. 369, pp. 669–675, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. P. Valente, W. Tao, and J.-P. Verbelen, “Auxins and cytokinins control DNA endoreduplication and deduplication in single cells of tobacco,” Plant Science, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 207–215, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. B. M. Horváth, Z. Magyar, Y. Zhang et al., “EBP1 regulates organ size through cell growth and proliferation in plants,” EMBO Journal, vol. 25, no. 20, pp. 4909–4920, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. H. Barbier-Brygoo, G. Ephritikhine, D. Klämbt et al., “Perception of the auxin signal at the plasma membrane of tobacco mesophyll protoplasts,” The Plant Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83–93, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. L. Evans, H. Ishikawa, and M. A. Estelle, “Responses of Arabidopsis roots to auxin studied with high temporal resolution: comparison of wild type and auxin-response mutants,” Planta, vol. 194, no. 2, pp. 215–222, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. A. Hemerly, J. de Almeida Engler, C. Bergounioux et al., “Dominant negative mutants of the Cdc2 kinase uncouple cell division from iterative plant development,” EMBO Journal, vol. 14, no. 16, pp. 3925–3936, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. N. K. Das, K. Patau, and F. Skoog, “Autoradiographic and microspectrophotometric studies of DNA synthesis in excised tobacco pith tissue,” Chromosoma, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 606–617, 1957. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. J. R. Jahlonski and F. Skoog, “Cell enlargement and cell division in excised tobacco pith tissue,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 16–24, 1954. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. J. Silberger Jr. and F. Skoog, “Changes induced by indoleacetic acid in nucleic acid contents and growth of tobacco pith tissue,” Science, vol. 118, no. 3068, pp. 443–444, 1953. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. V. Bradley and J. C. Crane, “The effect of 2, 4, 5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid on cell and nuclear size and endopolyploidy in parenchyma of apricot fruits,” American Journal of Botany, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 273–281, 1955. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. E. Liscum and R. P. Hangarter, “Arabidopsis mutants lacking blue light-dependent inhibition of hypocotyl elongation,” The Plant Cell, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 685–694, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. P. C. L. John, K. Zhang, C. Dong, L. Diederich, and F. Wightman, “p34cdc2 related proteins in control of cell cycle progression, the switch between division and differentiation in tissue development, and stimulation of division by auxin and cytokinin,” Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 20, no. 4-5, pp. 503–526, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. T. Yoshizumi, N. Nagata, H. Shimada, and M. Matsui, “An Arabidopsis cell cycle-dependent kinase-related gene, CDC2b, plays a role in regulating seedling growth in darkness,” The Plant Cell, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1883–1895, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. D. Ohri, R. M. Fritsch, and P. Hanelt, “Evolution of genome size in allium (alliaceae),” Plant Systematics and Evolution, vol. 210, no. 1-2, pp. 57–86, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. S. U. Andersen, S. Buechel, Z. Zhao et al., “Requirement of B2-type cyclin-dependent kinases for meristem integrity in Arabidopsis thaliana,” The Plant Cell, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 88–100, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus