BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

Radiopharmaceuticals in Nuclear Medicine: Recent Developments for SPECT and PET Studies

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 498072 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/498072

William Robeson, Vijay Dhawan, Yilong Ma, David Bjelke, Claude Margouleff, Thomas Chaly, David Eidelberg, "Radiation Absorbed Dose to the Basal Ganglia from Dopamine Transporter Radioligand 18F-FPCIT", BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 498072, 5 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/498072

Radiation Absorbed Dose to the Basal Ganglia from Dopamine Transporter Radioligand 18F-FPCIT

Academic Editor: Gianluca Valentini
Received30 Oct 2013
Revised15 May 2014
Accepted11 Jun 2014
Published30 Jun 2014

Abstract

Our previous dosimetry studies have demonstrated that for dopaminergic radiotracers, 18F-FDOPA and 18F-FPCIT, the urinary bladder is the critical organ. As these tracers accumulate in the basal ganglia (BG) with high affinity and long residence times, radiation dose to the BG may become significant, especially in normal control subjects. We have performed dynamic PET measurements using 18F-FPCIT in 16 normal adult subjects to determine if in fact the BG, although not a whole organ, but a well-defined substructure, receives the highest dose. Regions of interest were drawn over left and right BG structures. Resultant time-activity curves were generated and used to determine residence times for dosimetry calculations. -factors were computed using the MIRDOSE3 nodule model for each caudate and putamen. For 18F-FPCIT, BG dose ranged from 0.029 to 0.069 mGy/MBq. In half of all subjects, BG dose exceeded 85% of the published critical organ (bladder) dose, and in three of those, the BG dose exceeded that for the bladder. The BG can become the dose-limiting organ in studies using dopamine transporter ligands. For some normal subjects studied with F-18 or long half-life radionuclide, the BG may exceed bladder dose and become the critical structure.

1. Introduction

Neurology and psychiatry PET research has focused on compounds that localize in the basal ganglia (BG) and trace different functions of the dopaminergic pathway. We have studied three of these compounds: 18F-FDOPA, 11C-raclopride, and 18F-FPCIT. All of them localize in the BG with varying affinity. Published dosimetry has demonstrated that whole brain is not limiting for these compounds, but the BG substructures may be [13].

Our previous paper in J Nucl Med [2] was a whole body PET study designed to estimate dosimetry for all organs especially the bladder (bladder was found to be the critical organ in our previous dosimetry studies for 18F-FDOPA [1]). This study demonstrated that the critical organ was indeed the bladder with estimated dose of 0.217 rads/mCi and the maximum allowable injected dose was 23 mCi. Even though the current study was performed to determine the kinetics of 18F-FPCIT in the basal ganglia of normal subjects, we realized that this data could also be used for estimating radiation dose to these structures.

This particular study of 18F-FPCIT was undertaken to determine if, in subjects for which dynamic PET data was available, the BG structures were dose-limiting. With increasing clinical use of longer half-life labeled dopamine transporter radioligand, 123I-FPCIT (DatScan), this issue has become even more relevant. Previous dosimetry work has been focused on anatomically well-defined organs while the current work takes into account both anatomy and significant functional differences within the organs themselves. Uptake of dopaminergic radiotracers is a case in point where uptake, as well as the residence time, is far greater in BG (a well-defined substructure within the brain) compared to the rest of the brain. This observation leads us to believe that the radiation burden to BG will be higher than the rest of the brain. The same logic can, in the future, be used to treat renal cortex as distinct from the kidneys if new radiotracers were to specifically target these locations. The principle is similar to that of labeled monoclonal antibody therapy where the radionuclide binds to the tumor surface sites and delivers the required therapeutic radiation dose. The tumor can be small or large, homogeneously or heterogeneously distributed. This is in contrast to the BG, which is anatomically well-delineated and homogeneous at least as far as dopaminergic radiotracer uptake is concerned in normal subjects. The uptake of dopaminergic tracers in normal control subjects provides the worst-case scenario for dosimetry. All these studies were conducted under Radioactive Drug Research Committee approved protocols where the dose limits are organ-based. Finally, another issue that needs to be addressed is the question of radiosensitivity of brain compared to other organs. We do not yet have any data to suggest that BG is more radiosensitive than the rest of the brain (which itself is not very radiosensitive compared to reproductive organs) [4]. However, there is enough evidence to suggest that BG is more sensitive to hypoxia and has larger mitochondrial load and dopamine levels than the rest of the cortical structures. These differences can potentially lend BG to be relatively more sensitive to radiation than the rest of the brain [5].

2. Methods and Materials

Dynamic PET scans of the brain were acquired in 16 normal adult subjects. Data were acquired in 3D mode on a GE Advance tomograph (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI). Scanning protocol included 21 frames: 5 × 1 min, 5 × 2 min, 5 × 5 min, and 6 × 10 min. Ethical permission for the procedures was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of North Shore University Hospital. Written consent was obtained from each participant following a detailed explanation of the procedures. Thirty-five slices parallel to the orbital-meatus were collected over an axial field of view of 15 cm so that the entire brain was covered. Emission data were corrected for attenuation using a rotating Ge-68 source. Image reconstruction was performed using filtered backprojection with a cutoff resolution of 8 mm. All brain slices that included the BG were added to form a composite image. Regions of interest (ROI) were drawn over the left caudate, left putamen, right caudate, and right putamen, and time-activity curves were generated over the duration of the scan. No MRI scans were available for these normal subjects. Also, it was assumed that for dosimetry purposes, the ROI drawn on PET scans was sufficient without an MRI coregistration. Activity concentrations (kBq/cc) were computed using a calibration scan of a cylindrical phantom of known activity concentration. Time-activity curves for the four BG regions were fit to a nonlinear regression model of exponential uptake and clearance and analytical integration was employed to estimate the area under the curve (AUC). Units for AUC are (kBq/cc)(min). For each subject and each region, normalized AUC/MBq was calculated and then multiplied by mass (grams) and the -value (mGy/kBqmin) as follows:

We did not have individual MRI images available for estimating BG volumes. Therefore, BG structures were assumed to be spherical regions of mass 3.7 and 4.4 grams for caudate nuclei and putamen, respectively, in each brain hemisphere; these were derived from average masses of BG structures from seven published MRI datasets [612]. We could not use age dependent masses because the published data demonstrate no clear relationship between age and BG volume [612]. -factors for dosimetry calculations were determined from interpolation based upon data from the MIRDOSE 3 nodule module [13]. Doses were calculated for the BG from activity in the BG substructures which were then averaged and compared with published critical organ values. Given that 18F-FPCIT uptake decreases with age, we also investigated the relationship between dose to the BG and age [14].

3. Results

Figure 1 demonstrates an example of the fitting procedure used to calculate BG doses. Data from all four substructures from one subject are shown but only the right putamen data has been fitted to demonstrate a typical example of curve fit.

Figure 2 presents -values as a function of mass. A mass from 2 to 6 grams covers the range expected for caudate and putamen substructures of the BG [612]. A power relationship () provides a good fit to the data.

Table 1 presents the results for the BG doses for the 16 subjects studied. BG doses are compared to published values for critical organ (bladder) dose established in the literature. The average dose to the BG was approximately 81% of the bladder dose (bladder dose was obtained as 0.059 mGy/MBq from reference [2]). In half of the subjects () the BG dose was close to the dose to the urinary bladder (>85%). In three out of 16 subjects the BG dose exceeded the dose to the bladder (Table 1, bold italics). Therefore, in three subjects, the BG became the critical “organ” (not traditionally defined as an organ but a substructure in the brain).


SexAgeDose (mGy/MBq)Average BG doseBG fractional
L CauR CauL PutR Put(mGy/MBq)Dose*

m530.04440.04040.03900.04060.04110.6966
f520.07490.04890.05760.04820.05740.9728
f230.05010.05350.04310.06070.05180.8785
m500.03040.03010.02810.02830.02920.4954
f280.05770.05590.05380.05290.05510.9336
f230.04350.04280.04100.03920.04170.7060
m690.06880.07190.06960.06700.06931.1750
f650.03590.03640.03430.03450.03530.5977
f390.03010.07340.02600.05180.04530.7681
f560.02650.03240.03450.02750.03020.5125
f550.04790.04130.04030.03810.04190.7099
f730.05320.04230.07360.04120.05260.8915
m470.05820.05520.05560.04140.05260.8914
m700.04790.04530.03940.03800.04260.7228
f530.07250.07250.05340.05280.06281.0648
f760.06550.06570.05440.05190.05941.0063

Mean0.05050.05050.04650.04460.04800.8139
SD0.01470.01380.01340.01070.01120.1890

Caudate (Cau); putamen (Put); basal ganglia (BG). *Fractional dose is calculated by dividing the BG dose by bladder dose of 0.059 mGy/MBq taken from [2].

Figure 3 presents graphically the data from Table 1 demonstrating that in three subjects the dose to the BG exceeded that of the urinary bladder (critical organ for 18F-FPCIT) and the regression line between age and BG dose. No relationship between age and BG dose could be demonstrated (, ). BG dose based upon individually derived measures of BG volume could provide a better age versus dose relationship.

4. Discussion

PET studies utilizing radiopharmaceuticals that localize in the BG have become very useful in patients with movement disorders. Radiation dosimetry using the MIRD techniques has traditionally evaluated whole organ doses. Using standard dosimetry in humans with F-18 PET compounds, the urinary bladder is the critical organ. Neuroleptic compounds localize in the BG, and although the whole brain might not be critical, BG may be. We have used the MIRDOSE 3 software and the ability to determine lesion doses to evaluate BG dosimetry. Even though BG structures are not perfect spheres, this approximation may be sufficient for dosimetry purposes. This enabled us to calculate self-dose from BG uptake and determine if injected dosages should be modified to account for these structures. As the maximum dose to BG in one subject exceeded bladder dose by 18%, we are changing our guidelines to limit the maximum permissible injected dosage for 18F-FPCIT from 23 mCi to 19 mCi [2].

Even though we use 5 mCi for routine brain imaging with 18F-FPCIT, we think that it is not a question of 23 versus 5 mCi, but whether the limit of 23 mCi should be based upon bladder dose or BG dose [2]. We want to stress in this paper that BG should be considered a special structure because dopaminergic tracers bind avidly to these regions and have long residence times. It has been demonstrated that bladder is the dose-limiting organ for these radiotracers which we think is not appropriate. In the future, as we develop new radiotracers with high affinity to BG, especially for SPECT tracers with long half-life nuclides, BG exposure indeed may easily exceed bladder dose and thus become the dose-limiting “organ.” There are no prior studies suggesting that bladder is a very radiosensitive organ but it is still considered dose-limiting. This may be true for BG as well; we just do not have any direct studies on BG radiosensitivity. We have, however, mentioned in the introduction how BG may be more radiosensitive than the rest of the brain. We would prefer to err on the side of caution.

It is likely that F-18 labeled tracers, which take a long time to achieve BG equilibrium as opposed to C-11 labeled tracers, may need special focus on BG dosimetry. For tracers with long half-life, such as I-131 (half-life: 8 days), thyroid dose is high enough to limit the diagnostic (not therapeutic) injection to 4 mCi, which is a suboptimal dose for imaging. Similarly, Mn-52 and Sc-46 (half-lives: 5.6 days and 84 days, resp.), which have been recently considered for nonhuman imaging studies, will have serious limitations as to the injected dose for human diagnostic studies because of long residence times.

In our laboratory, we perform multitracer multiday protocols on the same subject and have to often limit the injected activity well below maximum allowable limit for 18F-FPCIT, 18F-FDG, and H215O in order to remain within radiation exposure guidelines. This compromise forces us to extend the scan time for 18F-FDG studies to keep signal-to-noise acceptable.

There are two limitations of the study: (1) no individual MRI estimates of caudate and putamen; and (2) bladder doses for individual subjects not being available. Nonetheless, these two issues are expected to have minor influence on our findings.

From the 16 normal subjects studied, BG appears to be the critical organ for dosimetric consideration in three subjects. In a total of eight subjects, BG dose exceeded 85% of the bladder dose and in three subjects BG dose actually exceeded the bladder dose. As new compounds with high affinity or for similar tracers with long half-life radionuclide label are developed, BG dosimetry should be considered in the development process.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (P50 NS 38370 and K24 NS 02101 to David Eidelberg). The authors acknowledge the valuable assistance of Ms. Toni Fitzpatrick and Ms. Yoon Young Choi in the preparation of this paper.

References

  1. V. Dhawan, A. Belakhlef, W. Robeson et al., “Bladder wall radiation dose in humans from fluorine-18-FDOPA,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1850–1852, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  2. W. Robeson, V. Dhawan, A. Belakhlef et al., “Dosimetry of the dopamine transporter radioligand 18F-FPCIT in human subjects,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 961–966, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  3. M. Slifstein, D. Hwang, D. Martinez et al., “Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of the dopamine D2 ligand 11C-raclopride determined from human whole-body PET,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 313–319, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  4. D. Greene-Schloesser, M. E. Robbins, A. M. Peiffer, E. G. Shaw, K. T. Wheeler, and M. D. Chan, “Radiation-induced brain injury: a review,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 2, article 73, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  5. T. Zaitseva, J. Creed, D. Antoni, D. F. Wilson, and A. Pastuszko, “CREB phosphorylation following hypoxia and ischemia in striatum of newborn piglets: possible role of dopamine,” Brain Research, vol. 1040, no. 1-2, pp. 169–177, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. E. H. Aylward, B. F. Sparks, K. M. Field et al., “Onset and rate of striatal atrophy in preclinical Huntington disease,” Neurology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 66–72, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. G. Douaud, V. Gaura, M.-. Ribeiro et al., “Distribution of grey matter atrophy in Huntington's disease patients: a combined ROI-based and voxel-based morphometric study,” NeuroImage, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1562–1575, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. L. Greenberg, D. F. Messer, M. E. Payne et al., “Aging, gender, and the elderly adult brain: an examination of analytical strategies,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 290–302, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. F. M. Gunning-Dixon, D. Head, J. McQuain, J. D. Acker, and N. Raz, “Differential aging of the human striatum: a prospective MR imaging study,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1501–1507, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  10. M. Mascalchi, F. Lolli, R. Della Nave et al., “Huntington disease: volumetric, diffusion-weighted, and magnetization transfer MR imaging of brain,” Radiology, vol. 232, no. 3, pp. 867–873, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. S. Paulsen, V. A. Magnotta, A. E. Mikos et al., “Brain structure in preclinical Huntington's disease,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 57–63, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. Raz, K. M. Rodrigue, K. M. Kennedy, D. Head, F. Gunning-Dixon, and J. D. Acker, “Differential aging of the human striatum: longitudinal evidence,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1849–1856, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  13. M. G. Stabin, “MIRDOSE: personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 538–546, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  14. K. Kazumata, V. Dhawan, T. Chaly et al., “Dopamine transporter imaging with fluorine-18-FPCIT and PET,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1521–1530, 1998. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 William Robeson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views908
Downloads419
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.