Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 547986, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/547986
Review Article

Molecular and Cellular Basis of Autosomal Recessive Primary Microcephaly

1Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, 110 avenue des Pins Ouest, Montréal, QC, Canada H2W 1R7
2Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada H3C 3J7
3Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada H3A 1A3

Received 16 July 2014; Revised 18 September 2014; Accepted 18 September 2014; Published 8 December 2014

Academic Editor: Saulius Butenas

Copyright © 2014 Marine Barbelanne and William Y. Tsang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Cox, A. P. Jackson, J. Bond, and C. G. Woods, “What primary microcephaly can tell us about brain growth,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 358–366, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Mahmood, W. Ahmad, and M. J. Hassan, “Autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH): clinical manifestations, genetic heterogeneity and mutation continuum,” Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, vol. 6, no. 1, article 39, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. G. Woods and A. Parker, “Investigating microcephaly,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 98, no. 9, pp. 707–713, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. G. Woods, J. Bond, and W. Enard, “Autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH): a review of clinical, molecular, and evolutionary findings,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 717–728, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Passemard, A. M. Kaindl, and A. Verloes, “Microcephaly,” in Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol. 111, pp. 129–141, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  6. S. Passemard, L. Titomanlio, M. Elmaleh et al., “Expanding the clinical and neuroradiologic phenotype of primary microcephaly due to ASPM mutations,” Neurology, vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 962–969, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. H. Mochida and C. A. Walsh, “Molecular genetics of human microcephaly,” Current Opinion in Neurology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 151–156, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Kerzendorfer, R. Colnaghi, I. Abramowicz, G. Carpenter, and M. O'Driscoll, “Meier-Gorlin syndrome and Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome: two developmental disorders highlighting the importance of efficient DNA replication for normal development and neurogenesis,” DNA Repair, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 637–644, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. K. Thornton and C. G. Woods, “Primary microcephaly: do all roads lead to Rome?” Trends in Genetics, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 501–510, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. M. Kaindl, S. Passemard, P. Kumar et al., “Many roads lead to primary autosomal recessive microcephaly,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 363–383, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Klingseisen and A. P. Jackson, “Mechanisms and pathways of growth failure in primordial dwarfism,” Genes and Development, vol. 25, no. 19, pp. 2011–2024, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. O'Driscoll, A. P. Jackson, and P. A. Jeggo, “Microcephalin: a causal link between impaired damage response signalling and microcephaly,” Cell Cycle, vol. 5, no. 20, pp. 2339–2344, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. P. Jackson, H. Eastwood, S. M. Bell et al., “Identification of microcephalin, a protein implicated in determining the size of the human brain,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 136–142, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Bond, E. Roberts, G. H. Mochida et al., “ASPM is a major determinant of cerebral cortical size,” Nature Genetics, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 316–320, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Bond, E. Roberts, K. Springell et al., “A centrosomal mechanism involving CDK5RAP2 and CENPJ controls brain size,” Nature Genetics, vol. 37, pp. 353–355, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  16. A. K. Nicholas, M. Khurshid, J. Désir et al., “WDR62 is associated with the spindle pole and is mutated in human microcephaly,” Nature Genetics, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1010–1014, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Issa, N. Kraemer, C. H. Rickert et al., “CDK5RAP2 expression during murine and human brain development correlates with pathology in primary autosomal recessive microcephaly,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 2245–2260, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. B. Huttner and Y. Kosodo, “Symmetric versus asymmetric cell division during neurogenesis in the developing vertebrate central nervous system,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 648–657, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. Peyre and X. Morin, “An oblique view on the role of spindle orientation in vertebrate neurogenesis,” Development Growth and Differentiation, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 287–305, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. Taverna, M. Gotz, and W. B. Huttner, “The cell biology of neurogenesis: toward an understanding of the development and evolution of the neocortex,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 30, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. J. L. Fish, C. Dehay, H. Kennedy, and W. B. Huttner, “Making bigger brains—the evolution of neural-progenitor-cell division,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 121, no. 17, pp. 2783–2793, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. X. Zhong, G. P. Pfeifer, and X. Xu, “Microcephalin encodes a centrosomal protein,” Cell Cycle, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 457–458, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. W. Yu, G. H. Mochida, D. J. Tischfield et al., “Mutations in WDR62, encoding a centrosome-associated protein, cause microcephaly with simplified gyri and abnormal cortical architecture,” Nature Genetics, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1015–1020, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. X. Zhong, L. Liu, A. Zhao, G. P. Pfeifer, and X. Xu, “The abnormal spindle-like, microcephaly-associated (ASPM) gene encodes a centrosomal protein,” Cell Cycle, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 1227–1229, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Kumar, S. C. Girimaji, M. R. Duvvari, and S. H. Blanton, “Mutations in STIL, encoding a pericentriolar and centrosomal protein, cause primary microcephaly,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 286–290, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. S. Hussain, S. M. Baig, S. Neumann et al., “A truncating mutation of CEP135 causes primary microcephaly and disturbed centrosomal function,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 871–878, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. L. Guernsey, H. Jiang, J. Hussin et al., “Mutations in centrosomal protein CEP152 in primary microcephaly families linked to MCPH4,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 40–51, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J.-H. Sir, A. R. Barr, A. K. Nicholas et al., “A primary microcephaly protein complex forms a ring around parental centrioles,” Nature Genetics, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1147–1153, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. S. Hussain, S. M. Baig, S. Neumann et al., “CDK6 associates with the centrosome during mitosis and is mutated in a large pakistani family with primary microcephaly,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 22, no. 25, pp. 5199–5214, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. I. B. Alieva and R. E. Uzbekov, “The centrosome is a polyfunctional multiprotein cell complex,” Biochemistry, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 626–643, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. Bornens, “The centrosome in cells and organisms,” Science, vol. 335, no. 6067, pp. 422–426, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. Debec, W. Sullivan, and M. Bettencourt-Dias, “Centrioles: active players or passengers during mitosis?” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 67, no. 13, pp. 2173–2194, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. E. A. Nigg and J. W. Raff, “Centrioles, centrosomes, and cilia in health and disease,” Cell, vol. 139, no. 4, pp. 663–678, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. W. Y. Tsang and B. D. Dynlacht, “CP110 and its network of partners coordinately regulate cilia assembly,” Cilia, vol. 2, no. 1, article 9, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. D. Hossain and W. Y. Tsang, “Centrosome dysfunction and senescence: coincidence or causality?” Journal of Aging Science, vol. 1, p. 113, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. E. H. Hinchcliffe and G. Sluder, ““It takes two to tango”: understanding how centrosome duplication is regulated throughout the cell cycle,” Genes and Development, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1167–1181, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. E. A. Nigg and T. Stearns, “The centrosome cycle: centriole biogenesis, duplication and inherent asymmetries,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1154–1160, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. E. Palazzo, J. M. Vogel, B. J. Schnackenberg, D. R. Hull, and X. Wu, “Centrosome maturation,” Current Topics in Developmental Biology, vol. 49, pp. 449–470, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. W. Brownlee and G. C. Rogers, “Show me your license, please: deregulation of centriole duplication mechanisms that promote amplification,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1021–1034, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. P. Jackson, D. P. McHale, D. A. Campbell et al., “Primary autosomal recessive microcephaly (MCPH1) maps to chromosome 8p22-pter,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 541–546, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. T. Venkatesh and P. S. Suresh, “Emerging roles of MCPH1: expedition from primary microcephaly to cancer,” European Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 98–105, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. L. J. Jeffers, B. J. Coull, S. J. Stack, and C. G. Morrison, “Distinct BRCT domains in Mcph1/Brit1 mediate ionizing radiation-induced focus formation and centrosomal localization,” Oncogene, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 139–144, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S.-Z. Yang, F.-T. Lin, and W.-C. Lin, “MCPH1/BRIT1 cooperates with E2F1 in the activation of checkpoint, DNA repair and apoptosis,” EMBO Reports, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 907–915, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. G. Peng and S.-Y. Lin, “BRITI/MCPHI is a multifunctional DNA damage responsive protein mediating DNA repair-associated chromatin remodeling,” Cell Cycle, vol. 8, no. 19, pp. 3071–3072, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. G. Peng, E.-K. Yim, H. Dai et al., “BRIT1/MCPH1 links chromatin remodelling to DNA damage response,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 865–872, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. L. Wood, Y. Liang, K. Li, and J. Chen, “Microcephalin/MCPH1 associates with the condensin II complex to function in homologous recombination repair,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 43, pp. 29586–29592, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. Trimborn, D. Schindler, H. Neitzel, and T. Hirano, “Misregulated chromosome condensation in MCPH1 primary microcephaly is mediated by condensin II,” Cell Cycle, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 322–326, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. A. Tibelius, J. Marhold, H. Zentgraf et al., “Microcephalin and pericentrin regulate mitotic entry via centrosome-associated Chk1,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 185, no. 7, pp. 1149–1157, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. R. Gruber, Z. Zhou, M. Sukchev, T. Joerss, P.-O. Frappart, and Z.-Q. Wang, “MCPH1 regulates the neuroprogenitor division mode by coupling the centrosomal cycle with mitotic entry through the Chk1-Cdc25 pathway,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1325–1334, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. Y. Liang, H. Gao, S.-Y. Lin et al., “BRIT1/MCPH1 is essential for mitotic and meiotic recombination DNA repair and maintaining genomic stability in mice,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID e1000826, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. Trimborn, M. Ghani, D. J. Walther et al., “Establishment of a mouse model with misregulated chromosome condensation due to defective Mcph1 function,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 2, Article ID e9242, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. Z. W. Zhou, A. Tapias, C. Bruhn, R. Gruber, M. Sukchev, and Z. Q. Wang, “DNA damage response in microcephaly development of MCPH1 mouse model,” DNA Repair, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 645–655, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. K. Bilgüvar, A. K. Öztürk, A. Louvi et al., “Whole-exome sequencing identifies recessive WDR62 mutations in severe brain malformations,” Nature, vol. 467, no. 7312, pp. 207–210, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. C. A. Bacino, L. A. Arriola, J. Wiszniewska, and P. E. Bonnen, “WDR62 missense mutation in a consanguineous family with primary microcephaly,” American Journal of Medical Genetics A, vol. 158, no. 3, pp. 622–625, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. A. Bogoyevitch, Y. Y. C. Yeap, Z. Qu et al., “WD40-repeat protein 62 is a JNK-phosphorylated spindle pole protein required for spindle maintenance and timely mitotic progression,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 125, no. 21, pp. 5096–5109, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. H. G. Farag, S. Froehler, K. Oexle et al., “Abnormal centrosome and spindle morphology in a patient with autosomal recessive primary microcephaly type 2 due to compound heterozygous WDR62 gene mutation,” Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, vol. 8, no. 1, article 178, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. R. A. MacCorkle-Chosnek, A. VanHooser, D. W. Goodrich, B. R. Brinkley, and T.-H. Tan, “Cell cycle regulation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase activity at the centrosomes,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 289, no. 1, pp. 173–180, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. D. Xu, F. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Sun, and Z. Xu, “Microcephaly-associated protein WDR62 regulates neurogenesis through JNK1 in the developing neocortex,” Cell Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 104–116, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. C. Novorol, J. Burkhardt, K. J. Wood et al., “Microcephaly models in the developing zebrafish retinal neuroepithelium point to an underlying defect in metaphase progression,” Open Biology, vol. 3, no. 10, Article ID 130065, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. J.-F. Chen, Y. Zhang, J. Wilde, K. C. Hansen, F. Lai, and L. Niswander, “Microcephaly disease gene Wdr62 regulates mitotic progression of embryonic neural stem cells and brain size,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, article 3885, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. V. Joukov, A. De Nicolo, A. Rodriguez, J. C. Walter, and D. M. Livingston, “Centrosomal protein of 192 kDa (Cep192) promotes centrosome-driven spindle assembly by engaging in organelle-specific Aurora A activation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 49, pp. 21022–21027, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. K.-W. Fong, Y.-K. Choi, J. B. Rattner, and R. Z. Qi, “CDK5RAP2 is a pericentriolar protein that functions in centrosomal attachment of the γ-tubulin ring complex,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 115–125, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. Y.-K. Choi, P. Liu, S. K. Sze, C. Dai, and R. Z. Qi, “CDK5RAP2 stimulates microtubule nucleation by the γ-tubulin ring complex,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 191, no. 6, pp. 1089–1095, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. K. Lee and K. Rhee, “PLK1 phosphorylation of pericentrin initiates centrosome maturation at the onset of mitosis,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 195, no. 7, pp. 1093–1101, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. S. Kim and K. Rhee, “Importance of the CEP215-pericentrin interaction for centrosome maturation during mitosis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 1, Article ID e87016, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. T. L. Megraw, J. T. Sharkey, and R. S. Nowakowski, “Cdk5rap2 exposes the centrosomal root of microcephaly syndromes,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 470–480, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. J. A. Barrera, L.-R. Kao, R. E. Hammer, J. Seemann, J. L. Fuchs, and T. L. Megraw, “CDK5RAP2 regulates centriole engagement and cohesion in mice,” Developmental Cell, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 913–926, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. S. Graser, Y.-D. Stierhof, and E. A. Nigg, “Cep68 and Cep215 (Cdk5rap2) are required for centrosome cohesion,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 120, no. 24, pp. 4321–4331, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. X. Zhang, D. Liu, S. Lv et al., “CDK5RAP2 is required for spindle checkpoint function,” Cell Cycle, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1206–1216, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. J. J. Buchman, H.-C. Tseng, Y. Zhou, C. L. Frank, Z. Xie, and L.-H. Tsai, “Cdk5rap2 interacts with pericentrin to maintain the neural progenitor pool in the developing neocortex,” Neuron, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 386–402, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. S. B. Lizarraga, S. P. Margossian, M. H. Harris et al., “Cdk5rap2 regulates centrosome function and chromosome segregation in neuronal progenitors,” Development, vol. 137, no. 11, pp. 1907–1917, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. A. Genin, J. Desir, N. Lambert et al., “Kinetochore KMN network gene CASC5 mutated in primary microcephaly,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 21, no. 24, pp. 5306–5317, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. I. M. Cheeseman, T. Hori, T. Fukagawa, and A. Desai, “KNL1 and the CENP-H/I/K complex coordinately direct kinetochore assembly in vertebrates,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 587–594, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. V. M. Bolanos-Garcia, T. Lischetti, D. Matak-Vinkovic et al., “Structure of a Blinkin-BUBR1 complex reveals an interaction crucial for kinetochore-mitotic checkpoint regulation via an unanticipated binding Site,” Structure, vol. 19, no. 11-12, pp. 1691–1700, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. V. Krenn, A. Wehenkel, X. Li, S. Santaguida, and A. Musacchio, “Structural analysis reveals features of the spindle checkpoint kinase Bub1-kinetochore subunit Knl1 interaction,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 196, no. 4, pp. 451–467, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. T. Kiyomitsu, C. Obuse, and M. Yanagida, “Human Blinkin/AF15q14 is required for chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint through direct interaction with Bub1 and BubR1,” Developmental Cell, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 663–676, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. D. Varma and E. D. Salmon, “The KMN protein network—Chief conductors of the kinetochore orchestra,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 125, no. 24, pp. 5927–5936, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. J. Bond, S. Scott, D. J. Hampshire et al., “Protein-truncating mutations in ASPM cause variable reduction in brain size,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 1170–1177, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. A. Kumar, S. H. Blanton, M. Babu, M. Markandaya, and S. C. Girimaji, “Genetic analysis of primary microcephaly in Indian families: novel ASPM mutations,” Clinical Genetics, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 341–348, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. B. Pichon, S. Vankerckhove, G. Bourrouillou, L. Duprez, and M. J. Abramowicz, “A translocation breakpoint disrupts the ASPM gene in a patient with primary microcephaly,” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 419–421, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. J. Shen, W. Eyaid, G. H. Mochida et al., “ASPM mutations identified in patients with primary microcephaly and seizures,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 725–729, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. A. Gul, M. J. Hassan, S. Mahmood et al., “Genetic studies of autosomal recessive primary microcephaly in 33 Pakistani families: novel sequence variants in ASPM gene,” Neurogenetics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 105–110, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. A. Gul, M. Tariq, M. N. Khan, M. J. Hassan, G. Ali, and W. Ahmad, “Novel protein-truncating mutations in the ASPM gene in families with autosomal recessive primary microcephaly,” Journal of Neurogenetics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 153–163, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. J. Desir, M. Cassart, P. David, P. van Bogaert, and M. Abramowicz, “Primary microcephaly with ASPM mutation shows simplified cortical gyration with antero-posterior gradient pre- and post-natally,” The American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, vol. 146, no. 11, pp. 1439–1443, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. F. Muhammad, S. M. Baig, L. Hansen et al., “Compound heterozygous aspm mutations in pakistani MCPH families,” The American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, vol. 149, no. 5, pp. 926–930, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. A. K. Nicholas, E. A. Swanson, J. J. Cox et al., “The molecular landscape of ASPM mutations in primary microcephaly,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 249–253, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. A. Saadi, G. Borck, N. Boddaert et al., “Compound heterozygous ASPM mutations associated with microcephaly and simplified cortical gyration in a consanguineous Algerian family,” European Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 180–184, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. H. Darvish, S. Esmaeeli-Nieh, G. B. Monajemi et al., “A clinical and molecular genetic study of 112 Iranian families with primary microcephaly,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 823–828, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. R. Kousar, H. Nawaz, M. Khurshid et al., “Mutation analysis of the ASPM gene in 18 Pakistani families with autosomal recessive primary microcephaly,” Journal of Child Neurology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 715–720, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. C. R. Jamieson, J.-P. Fryns, J. Jacobs, G. Matthijs, and M. J. Abramowicz, “Primary autosomal recessive microcephaly: MCPH5 maps to 1q25-q32,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1575–1577, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. W. Y. Tsang, A. Spektor, D. J. Luciano et al., “CP110 cooperates with two calcium-binding proteins to regulate cytokinesis and genome stability,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 3423–3434, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. J. Higgins, C. Midgley, A. M. Bergh et al., “Human ASPM participates in spindle organisation, spindle orientation and cytokinesis,” BMC Cell Biology, vol. 11, article 85, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. J. L. Fish, Y. Kosodo, W. Enard, S. Paabo, and W. B. Huttner, “Aspm specifically maintains symmetric proliferative divisions of neuroepithelial cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 27, pp. 10438–10443, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. C. Gonzalez, R. D. C. Saunders, J. Casal et al., “Mutations at the asp locus of Drosophila lead to multiple free centrosomes in syncytial embryos, but restrict centrosome duplication in larval neuroblasts,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 605–616, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. M. G. Riparbelli, G. Callaini, D. M. Glover, and M. do Carmo Avides, “A requirement for the abnormal spindle protein to organise microtubules of the central spindle for cytokinesis in Drosophila,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 913–922, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. J. N. Pulvers, J. Bryk, J. L. Fish et al., “Mutations in mouse Aspm (abnormal spindle-like microcephaly associated) cause not only microcephaly but also major defects in the germline,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 38, pp. 16595–16600, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. J. Casal, C. Gonzalez, F. Wandosell, J. Avila, and P. Ripoll, “Abnormal meiotic spindles cause a cascade of defects during spermatogenesis in asp males of Drosophila,” Development, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 251–260, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. A. Fujimori, K. Itoh, S. Goto et al., “Disruption of Aspm causes microcephaly with abnormal neuronal differentiation,” Brain and Development, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 661–669, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. X.-L. Xu, W. Ma, Y.-B. Zhu et al., “The microtubule-associated protein ASPM regulates spindle assembly and meiotic progression in mouse oocytes,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 11, Article ID e49303, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. N. Kouprina, A. Pavlicek, N. K. Collins et al., “The microcephaly ASPM gene is expressed in proliferating tissues and encodes for a mitotic spindle protein,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 14, no. 15, pp. 2155–2165, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. C. Hagemann, J. Anacker, S. Gerngras et al., “Expression analysis of the autosomal recessive primary microcephaly genes MCPH1 (microcephalin) and MCPH5 (ASPM, abnormal spindle-like, microcephaly associated) in human malignant gliomas,” Oncology Reports, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 301–308, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. S.-Y. Lin, H.-W. Pan, S.-H. Liu et al., “ASPM is a novel marker for vascular invasion, early recurrence, and poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 15, pp. 4814–4820, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. R. Alsiary, A. Brüning-Richardson, J. Bond, E. E. Morrison, N. Wilkinson, and S. M. Bell, “Deregulation of microcephalin and ASPM expression are correlated with epithelial ovarian cancer progression,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 5, Article ID e97059, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. P. Gönczy, “Towards a molecular architecture of centriole assembly,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 425–435, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. S. Leidel and P. Gönczy, “Centrosome duplication and nematodes: recent insights from an old relationship,” Developmental Cell, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 317–325, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. J. Kleylein-Sohn, J. Westendorf, M. le Clech, R. Habedanck, Y.-D. Stierhof, and E. A. Nigg, “Plk4-induced centriole biogenesis in human cells,” Developmental Cell, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 190–202, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. K. F. Sonnen, A. M. Gabryjonczyk, E. Anselm, E. A. Nigg, and Y. D. Stierhof, “Human cep192 and cep152 cooperate in plk4 recruitment and centriole duplication,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 126, no. 14, pp. 3223–3233, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. T.-S. Kim, J.-E. Park, A. Shukla et al., “Hierarchical recruitment of Plk4 and regulation of centriole biogenesis by two centrosomal scaffolds, Cep192 and Cep152,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 50, pp. E4849–E4857, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. E. M. Hatch, A. Kulukian, A. J. Holland, D. W. Cleveland, and T. Stearns, “Cep152 interacts with Plk4 and is required for centriole duplication,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 191, no. 4, pp. 721–729, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. O. Cizmecioglu, M. Arnold, R. Bahtz et al., “Cep152 acts as a scaffold for recruitment of Plk4 and CPAP to the centrosome,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 191, no. 4, pp. 731–739, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. N. S. Dzhindzhev, Q. D. Yu, K. Weiskopf et al., “Asterless is a scaffold for the onset of centriole assembly,” Nature, vol. 467, no. 7316, pp. 714–718, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. M. van Breugel, M. Hirono, A. Andreeva et al., “Structures of SAS-6 suggest its organization in centrioles,” Science, vol. 331, no. 6021, pp. 1196–1199, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. D. Kitagawa, I. Vakonakis, N. Olieric et al., “Structural basis of the 9-fold symmetry of centrioles,” Cell, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 364–375, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. R. Qiao, G. Cabral, M. M. Lettman, A. Dammermann, and G. Dong, “SAS-6 coiled-coil structure and interaction with SAS-5 suggest a regulatory mechanism in C. elegans centriole assembly,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 31, no. 22, pp. 4334–4347, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. M. Lettman, Y. Wong, V. Viscardi et al., “Direct binding of SAS-6 to ZYG-1 recruits SAS-6 to the mother centriole for cartwheel assembly,” Developmental Cell, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 284–298, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. M. Delattre, C. Canard, and P. Gönczy, “Sequential protein recruitment in C. elegans centriole formation,” Current Biology, vol. 16, no. 18, pp. 1844–1849, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. L. Pelletier, E. O’Toole, A. Schwager, A. A. Hyman, and T. Müller-Reichert, “Centriole assembly in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Nature, vol. 444, no. 7119, pp. 619–623, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. C. J. C. Tang, S. Y. Lin, W. B. Hsu et al., “The human microcephaly protein STIL interacts with CPAP and is required for procentriole formation,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 30, no. 23, pp. 4790–4804, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. L.-Y. Hung, H.-L. Chen, C.-W. Chang, B.-R. Li, and T. K. Tang, “Identification of a novel microtubule-destabilizing motif in CPAP that binds to tubulin heterodimers and inhibits microtubule assembly,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 2697–2706, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. W.-B. Hsu, L.-Y. Hung, C.-J. C. Tang, C.-L. Su, Y. Chang, and T. K. Tang, “Functional characterization of the microtubule-binding and -destabilizing domains of CPAP and d-SAS-4,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 314, no. 14, pp. 2591–2602, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. D. Comartin, G. D. Gupta, E. Fussner et al., “CEP120 and SPICE1 cooperate with CPAP in centriole elongation,” Current Biology, vol. 23, no. 14, pp. 1360–1366, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. Y.-N. Lin, C.-T. Wu, Y.-C. Lin et al., “CEP120 interacts with CPAP and positively regulates centriole elongation,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 202, no. 2, pp. 211–219, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. Y. C. Lin, C. W. Chang, W. B. Hsu et al., “Human microcephaly protein CEP135 binds to hSAS-6 and CPAP, and is required for centriole assembly,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1141–1154, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. C.-J. C. Tang, R.-H. Fu, K.-S. Wu, W.-B. Hsu, and T. K. Tang, “CPAP is a cell-cycle regulated protein that controls centriole length,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 825–831, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. T. I. Schmidt, J. Kleylein-Sohn, J. Westendorf et al., “Control of centriole length by CPAP and CP110,” Current Biology, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1005–1011, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. G. Kohlmaier, J. Lončarek, X. Meng et al., “Overly long centrioles and defective cell division upon excess of the SAS-4-related protein CPAP,” Current Biology, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1012–1018, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. J.-H. Cho, C.-J. Chang, C.-Y. Chen, and T. K. Tang, “Depletion of CPAP by RNAi disrupts centrosome integrity and induces multipolar spindles,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 339, no. 3, pp. 742–747, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. J. Gopalakrishnan, V. Mennella, S. Blachon et al., “Sas-4 provides a scaffold for cytoplasmic complexes and tethers them in a centrosome,” Nature Communications, vol. 2, article 359, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. L.-Y. Hung, C.-J. C. Tang, and T. K. Tang, “Protein 4.1 R-135 interacts with a novel centrosomal protein (CPAP) which is associated with the γ-tubulin complex,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 20, no. 20, pp. 7813–7825, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. J. Gopalakrishnan, Y.-C. Chim, A. Ha et al., “Tubulin nucleotide status controls Sas-4-dependent pericentriolar material recruitment,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 865–873, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. L. Shi, Q. Lin, and B. Su, “Human-specific hypomethylation of CENPJ, a key brain size regulator,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 594–604, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  132. R. E. McIntyre, P. L. Chavali, O. Ismail et al., “Disruption of mouse Cenpj, a regulator of centriole biogenesis, phenocopies Seckel syndrome,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e1003022, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. S. Ladha, “Step to CEP152: uncovering a new mutation implicated in Seckel syndrome,” Clinical Genetics, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 428–430, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. J. Vulprecht, A. David, A. Tibelius et al., “STIL is required for centriole duplication in human cells,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 125, no. 5, pp. 1353–1362, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. C. Arquint, K. F. Sonnen, Y.-D. Stierhof, and E. A. Nigg, “Cell-cycle-regulated expression of STIL controls centriole number in human cells,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 125, no. 5, pp. 1342–1352, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. R. Habedanck, Y.-D. Stierhof, C. J. Wilkinson, and E. A. Nigg, “The Polo kinase Plk4 functions in centriole duplication,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1140–1146, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. S. Leidel, M. Delattre, L. Cerutti, K. Baumer, and P. Gönczy, “SAS-6 defines a protein family required for centrosome duplication in C. elegans and in human cells,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 115–125, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. D. Kitagawa, G. Kohlmaier, D. Keller et al., “Spindle positioning in human cells relies on proper centriole formation and on the microcephaly proteins CPAP and STIL,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 124, no. 22, pp. 3884–3893, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. K. L. Pfaff, C. T. Straub, K. Chiang, D. M. Bear, Y. Zhou, and L. I. Zon, “The zebra fish cassiopeia mutant reveals that SIL is required for mitotic spindle organization,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 27, no. 16, pp. 5887–5897, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. S. Izraeli, L. A. Lowe, V. L. Bertness et al., “The SIL gene is required for mouse embryonic axial development and left-right specification,” Nature, vol. 399, no. 6737, pp. 691–694, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. K. Kim, S. Lee, J. Chang, and K. Rhee, “A novel function of CEP135 as a platform protein of C-NAP1 for its centriolar localization,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 314, no. 20, pp. 3692–3700, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. A. Kumar, V. Rajendran, R. Sethumadhavan, and R. Purohit, “CEP proteins: the knights of centrosome dynasty,” Protoplasma, vol. 250, no. 5, pp. 965–983, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. B. Inanç, M. Pütz, P. Lalor et al., “Abnormal centrosomal structure and duplication in Cep135-deficient vertebrate cells,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 24, no. 17, pp. 2645–2654, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. Z. Carvalho-Santos, P. Machado, I. Alvarez-Martins et al., “BLD10/CEP135 is a microtubule-associated protein that controls the formation of the flagellum central microtubule pair,” Developmental Cell, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 412–424, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. H. Roque, A. Wainman, J. Richens, K. Kozyrska, A. Franz, and J. W. Raff, “Drosophila Cep135/Bld10 maintains proper centriole structure but is dispensable for cartwheel formation,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 125, no. 23, pp. 5881–5886, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. K. Matsuura, P. A. Lefebvre, R. Kamiya, and M. Hirono, “Bld10p, a novel protein essential for basal body assembly in Chlamydomonas: localization to the cartwheel, the first ninefold symmetrical structure appearing during assembly,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 165, no. 5, pp. 663–671, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. M. Hiraki, Y. Nakazawa, R. Kamiya, and M. Hirono, “Bld10p constitutes the cartwheel-spoke tip and stabilizes the 9-fold symmetry of the centriole,” Current Biology, vol. 17, no. 20, pp. 1778–1783, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  148. M. Jerka-Dziadosz, D. Gogendeau, C. Klotz, J. Cohen, J. Beisson, and F. Koll, “Basal body duplication in paramecium: the key role of Bld10 in assembly and stability of the Cartwheel,” Cytoskeleton, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 161–171, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  149. B. A. Bayless, T. H. Giddings Jr., M. Winey, and C. G. Pearson, “Bld10/Cep135 stabilizes basal bodies to resist cilia-generated forces,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 23, no. 24, pp. 4820–4832, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  150. V. Mottier-Pavie and T. L. Megraw, “Drosophila Bld10 is a centriolar protein that regulates centriole, basal body, and motile cilium assembly,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 2605–2614, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  151. E. Kalay, G. Yigit, Y. Aslan et al., “CEP152 is a genome maintenance protein disrupted in Seckel syndrome,” Nature Genetics, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 23–26, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  152. T. Avidor-Reiss and J. Gopalakrishnan, “Building a centriole,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 72–77, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  153. N. J. Brown, M. Marjanovic, J. Lüders, T. H. Stracker, and V. Costanzo, “Cep63 and cep152 cooperate to ensure centriole duplication,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 7, Article ID e69986, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  154. G. Lukinavičius, D. Lavogina, M. Orpinell et al., “Selective chemical crosslinking reveals a Cep57-Cep63-Cep152 centrosomal complex,” Current Biology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 265–270, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  155. S. Garapaty, C.-F. Xu, P. Trojer, M. A. Mahajan, T. A. Neubert, and H. H. Samuels, “Identification and characterization of a novel nuclear protein complex involved in nuclear hormone receptor-mediated gene regulation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 12, pp. 7542–7552, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  156. Y. J. Yang, A. E. Baltus, R. S. Mathew et al., “Microcephaly gene links trithorax and REST/NRSF to control neural stem cell proliferation and differentiation,” Cell, vol. 151, no. 5, pp. 1097–1112, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  157. S. Awad, M. S. Al-Dosari, N. Al-Yacoub et al., “Mutation in PHC1 implicates chromatin remodeling in primary microcephaly pathogenesis,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 2200–2213, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  158. K.-E. K. Tachibana, M. A. Gonzalez, G. Guarguaglini, E. A. Nigg, and R. A. Laskey, “Depletion of licensing inhibitor geminin causes centrosome overduplication and mitotic defects,” EMBO Reports, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1052–1057, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  159. F. Lu, R. Lan, H. Zhang, Q. Jiang, and C. Zhang, “Geminin is partially localized to the centrosome and plays a role in proper centrosome duplication,” Biology of the Cell, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 273–285, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  160. C. Bertoli, J. M. Skotheim, and R. A. M. de Bruin, “Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 518–528, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  161. D. Mahony, D. A. Parry, and E. Lees, “Active cdk6 complexes are predominantly nuclear and represent only a minority of the cdk6 in T cells,” Oncogene, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 603–611, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  162. D. M. Kohrt, J. I. Crary, V. Gocheva, P. W. Hinds, and M. J. Grossel, “Distinct subcellular distribution of cyclin dependent kinase 6,” Cell Cycle, vol. 8, no. 17, pp. 2837–2843, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  163. T. K. Kwon, M. A. Buchholz, E. W. Gabrielson, and A. A. Nordin, “A novel cytoplasmic substrate for cdk4 and cdk6 in normal and malignant epithelial derived cells,” Oncogene, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 2077–2083, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  164. M. Malumbres, R. Sotillo, D. Santamaría et al., “Mammalian cells cycle without the D-type cyclin-dependent kinases Cdk4 and Cdk6,” Cell, vol. 118, no. 4, pp. 493–504, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  165. D. Mi, C. Carr, P. A. Georgala et al., “Pax6 Exerts regional control of cortical progenitor proliferation via direct repression of Cdk6 and Hypophosphorylation of pRb,” Neuron, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 269–284, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  166. P. Beukelaers, R. Vandenbosch, N. Caron et al., “Cdk6-dependent regulation of G1 length controls adult neurogenesis,” Stem Cells, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 713–724, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  167. A. Rauch, C. T. Thiel, D. Schindler et al., “Mutations in the pericentrin (PCNT) gene cause primordial dwarfism,” Science, vol. 319, no. 5864, pp. 816–819, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  168. V. Marthiens, M. A. Rujano, C. Pennetier, S. Tessier, P. Paul-Gilloteaux, and R. Basto, “Centrosome amplification causes microcephaly,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 731–740, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  169. E. Roberts, A. P. Jackson, A. C. Carradice et al., “The second locus for autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH2) maps to chromosome 19q13.1-13.2,” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 815–820, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  170. L. Moynihan, A. P. Jackson, E. Roberts et al., “A third novel locus for primary autosomal recessive microcephaly maps to chromosome 9q34,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 724–727, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  171. C. R. Jamieson, C. Govaerts, and M. J. Abramowicz, “Primary autosomal recessive microcephaly: homozygosity mapping of MCPH4 to chromosome 15,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 1465–1469, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  172. L. Pattison, Y. J. Crow, V. J. Deeble et al., “A fifth locus for primary autosomal recessive microcephaly maps to chromosome 1q31,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1578–1580, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus