BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 580981 | 15 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/580981

Molecular Epidemiology and Genotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolated in Baghdad

Academic Editor: Tomasz Jagielski
Received07 Nov 2013
Revised17 Jan 2014
Accepted18 Jan 2014
Published26 Feb 2014

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major health problem in Iraq but the strains responsible for the epidemic have been poorly characterized. Our aim was to characterize the TB strains circulating in Bagdad (Iraq). A total of 270 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) strains isolated between 2010 and 2011 from TB patients attending the Center of Chest and Respiratory diseases in Baghdad were analyzed by Spoligotyping. The analysis indicated that 94.1% of the isolates belong to known genotype clades: CAS 39.6%, ill-defined T clade 29.6%, Manu 7.4%, Haarlem 7%, Ural 4.1%, LAM 3.3%, X 0.7%, LAM7-TUR 0.7%, EAI 0.7%, S 0.7%, and unknown 5.9%. Comparison with the international multimarker database SITVIT2 showed that SIT 309 (CAS1-Delhi) and SIT1144 (T1) were the most common types. In addition, 44 strains were included in SITVIT2 database under 16 new Spoligotype International Types (SITs); of these, 6 SITs (SIT3346, SIT3497, SIT3708, SIT3790, SIT3791, and SIT3800) (n = 32 strains) were created within the present study and 10 were created after a match with an orphan in the database. By using 24-loci MIRU-VNTR-typing on a subset of 110 samples we found a high recent transmission index (RTI) of 33.6%. In conclusion, we present the first unifying framework for both epidemiology and evolutionary analysis of M. tuberculosis in Iraq.

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is an ancient disease that currently represents an immense global health challenge. In 2011, WHO estimated that globally there were 8.7 million new cases of active TB leading to 1.4 million reported deaths [1].

According to the 2012 report of the Ministry of Health (MOH), the incidence rate of TB in Iraq was 45/100,000, with 13,860 new TB cases and 1140 of previously treated cases. The Iraqi laboratory network includes 124 district smear microscopy laboratories and one national reference laboratory located in Baghdad performing cultures and drug susceptibility testing of M. tuberculosis [2].

In the last decades, a large number of different molecular methods based on DNA fingerprints have been developed. The usefulness of these methods has been demonstrated primarily as epidemiological markers to discriminate the pathogen at the genus, species, and subspecies level. The level of strain differentiation is of crucial importance for the study of transmission dynamics, determining whether the infection is caused by single strain or by multiple strain and if recurrence of the disease is due to treatment failure or infection with new strain of M. tuberculosis [3, 4]. Spoligotyping, targeting the Direct Repeat locus and Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit-Variable Number Tandem Repeats (MIRU-VNTRs) typing, has been shown to be a valuable alternative to IS6110 [5, 6]. An optimized 24-loci MIRU-VNTR typing scheme has been proposed as international standard [7, 8]. In addition to their use for tracing TB transmission at the strain level, MIRU-VNTR markers are also phylogenetically more informative, especially in the 24-locus format and can therefore be used to predict grouping into strain lineage [9, 10].

Although TB is still a public health problem in Iraq, there is little information about the genetic characteristics of the isolates driving the epidemic. A better knowledge of the molecular characteristics of M. tuberculosis complex isolates could contribute to better understanding of the transmission dynamics of the disease within the country and can guide interventions to control the epidemic. The aim of this study is to determine molecular epidemiology features of M. tuberculosis isolates in Baghdad, as well as in other Iraqi governorates, to assess their transmission dynamics.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

This study was conducted in Baghdad at the Center of Chest and Respiratory diseases. A total of 270 isolates were collected between 2010 and 2011 representing approximately 40% of new and previously treated TB patients. This study was approved by the local ethical committee.

2.2. Culture and Drug Susceptibility Test

Diagnostic specimens were cultured and isolated on Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) media after decontamination. Drug Susceptibility Tests (DST) against first-line anti-TB drugs rifampicin (RFP), isoniazid (INH), streptomycin (SM), and ethambutol (EMB) were combined with LJ medium at the following concentrations: RFP 40 μg/mL, INH 0.2 μg/mL, SM 4 μg/mL, and EMB 2 μg/mL. DST was used to detect the drug resistance of M. tuberculosis by the proportion method [11].

2.3. Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates were identified on the basis of colony morphology, growth rate, pigmentation properties, niacin accumulation, nitrate reduction, thiophene-2-carboxylic acid hydrazide (TCH), and para-nitrobenzoic acid (PNB) test [11].

2.4. DNA Extraction

DNA was extracted from cultures by the standard Cetyltrimethyl ammonium-bromide (CTAB) method. The DNA was stored in TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA) at −20°C until use [12].

2.5. Spoligotyping

All genotyping methods were performed at the Emerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, WHO/IUATLD Supra-National Reference TB Laboratory, San Raffaele Scientific Institute (FCSR). Spoligotyping analysis was performed by using commercial kit (Ocimun Biosolutions) as described by Kamerbeek et al. [13]. The 43 spacers between the direct repeats in the target region were amplified by using DRa biotinylated at 5′ end and DRb primers. The PCR products were hybridized to a membrane containing 43 oligonucleotides by reverse line blotting. M. tuberculosis H37Rv and M. bovis BCG were used as positive controls in each run. Spoligotyping results were converted into octal code and analyzed by using the SITVIT2 proprietary database of the Pasteur Institute of Guadeloupe, which is an updated version of the previously released SpolDB4 and SITVITWEB databases [14, 15].

2.6. MIRU-VNTR

Standardized 24-loci MIRU-VNTR typing [7] was performed using the MIRU-VNTR typing kit (Genoscreen, Lille, France). PCR products were run with Genescan 1200LIZ size standard (Applied Biosystems, California, and USA) on ABI3730 sequencer. Sizing of the PCR fragments and assignment of MIRU-VNTR alleles were done by Gene Mapper software version 3.7 (Applied Biosystems, California, USA). In order to deine clusters and to build an UPMGA tree, we used the MIRU-VNTRplus web application available at http://www.miru-vntrplus.org/MIRU/index.faces. The allelic diversity of the strains was determined by using the Hunter Gaston Discriminatory Index (HGDI).

2.7. Interpretation of Typing Results

Spoligotypes in binary format and MIRU patterns in 24-digit codes were entered in the SITVIT2 database. At the time of the comparison, it contained genotyping data on more than 100,000 MTBC strains isolated from 160 countries of patient origin. In this database, “SIT” (Spoligotype International Type) designates spoligotyping shared by two or more patient isolates, “MIT” (MIRU International Type) designates 24-loci MIRU patterns shared by two or more patient isolates, and “orphan” designates patterns reported for a single isolate. Major spoligotyping-based phylogenetic clades were assigned according to revised signatures provided in SITVITWEB [15]. These clades include specific signatures for M. tuberculosis complex members and rules defining major lineages/sublineages for M. tuberculosis sensu stricto, that is, the Central Asian (CAS) clade and 2 sublineages, the East-African-Indian (EAI) clade and 9 sublineages, the Haarlem (H) clade and 3 sublineages, the Latin-American-Mediterranean (LAM) clade and 12 sublineages note that two LAM sublineages were recently raised to lineage level: LAM10-CAM as the Cameroon lineage [16] and LAM7-TUR as the Turkey lineage [17], the “Manu” family and 3 sublineages, the IS6110-low-banding X clade and 4 sublineages, and an ill-defined T clade with 5 sublineages. The recently described “Ural” family, subdivided into 2 sublineages (Ural-1 and Ural-2), replaced some spoligotype patterns previously classified as H3 and H4 [18].

2.8. Phylogenetic Analysis

The evolutionary relationships among all the observed spoligotypes were studied by drawing minimum spanning trees (MSTs) with BioNumerics Software version 6.6 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium).

3. Results

3.1. Studied Population

This study was performed over a period of 13 months on 270 M. tuberculosis complex strains from Iraqi patients. The related demographic information and drug resistance patterns obtained are summarized in Table 1. One hundred and fifty-seven (58.14%) of the cases included in the study were from Baghdad, 113 (41.85%) were from other governorates in Iraq but diagnosed in Baghdad. As shown in the table, male patients are predominants (male to female sex ratios varied from 1.49 to 3.04 depending on the origin of the patients, from Baghdad or other governorates, resp.) and 56.7% of the TB patients included in the study are between 21 and 40 years old with the mean age 36.3. As for smear microscopy, 167 tested positive and 103 were negative. 187 patients had newly TB diagnosed, while 83 patients were previously treated cases (PTC). Lastly, 171 cases were susceptible to all antituberculosis drugs, whereas 64/270 (23.7%) patients had MDR. 35 patients had an unknown resistance profile.


ParametersOrigin of patients
Baghdad (%)Other governorates (%)Total

Total no. of strain157 (58.1)113 (41.9)270
Sex
 Male94 ( 59.9)85 (75.2)179
 Female63 (40.1)28 (24.8)91
 Sex ratio M : F1.493.041.97
Age group (yr) (no.)
 0–2017 (10.8)4 (3.5)21
 21–4082 (52.2)71 (62.8)153
 41–6048 (30.6)25 (22.1)73
 >6010 (6.4)13 (11.5)23
Smear microscopy (no.)
 Positive98 (62.4)69 (61.1)167 (61.8)
 Negative59 (37.6)44 (38.9)103 (38.2)
Treatment
 New cases119 (75.8)68 (60.2)187 (69.3)
 P.T.C38 ( 24.2)45 (39.8)83 (30.7)
Drug susceptibility
 Susceptible to all drugs102 (65)69 (61.1)171 (63.3)
 MDR (INH − RIF)31 (19.8)33 (29.2)64 (23.7)
 Unknown24 (15.3)11 (9.7)35 (13.0)

3.2. Distribution of Phylogenetic Clades

Spoligotyping results are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. A total of 117 different patterns were observed among 270 strains studied; a total of 53 patterns corresponding to 53 strains belonged to orphan patterns not yet reported to the SITVIT2 database (Table 2), whereas the remaining 64 patterns () corresponded to SITs, of which 48 patterns ( strains) matched a preexisting shared type in the SITVIT2 database, while 16 SITs ( strains) were newly created. Of these, 6 SITs (SIT3346, SIT3497, SIT3708, SIT3790, SIT3791, and SIT3800) ( strains) were created within the present study and 10 were created after a match with an orphan in the database (SIT3275 from France metropolitan area, SIT3789 from Iraq, SIT3792, SIT3793, and SIT3794 from India, SIT3795 and SIT3799 from Brazil, SIT3796 from Pakistan, SIT3797 from Mexico, and SIT3798 from Iraq).


Iso numberYearStrainSpoligotype descriptionOctal codeLineage*Label Drug R**Isolation citySex/age

IRQ0220100435120104351580981.table002a677777377413771EAI5O010WasitF/60
IRQ0220102387620103876580981.table002a1703767740003071CAS1-DelhiO022BaghdadM/29
IRQ0220101552720105527580981.table002a2037727777760771T3O031BabilF/29
IRQ0220100395420103954580981.table002b037657777741770UnknownO040BaghdadM/22
IRQ0220111331320113313580981.table002b1437727777760771T3O051SulaimaniyaM/35
IRQ0220111424320114243580981.table002c537637777760771T1O061BaghdadF/35
IRQ0220101488820104888580981.table002c1177767377400671UnknownO071DiyalaM/33
IRQ0220101695220106952580981.table002d577777777520771H3O081BaghdadM/35
IRQ0220101719720107197580981.table002d1557727777400771UnknownO091BaghdadM/39
IRQ0220111528220115282580981.table002e757767740003171UnknownO101BaghdadM/35
IRQ0220111544820115448580981.table002e1757777740763771Manu2O111DiyalaM/63
IRQ0220101316720103167580981.table002f703627400003771CASO121BaghdadF/16
IRQ0220100392420103924580981.table002f1703637400003771CASO130BaghdadM/48
IRQ0220100514520105145580981.table002g477767607760771LAM1O140Najaf F/35
IRQ0220100498120104981580981.table002g1557747607740661LAM9O150Dhi-qar M/37
IRQ0220102586120105861580981.table002h637737777760771T3O162Al-QadisiyaM/29
IRQ0220102664720106647580981.table002h1777767636760771T1O172BasraF/29
IRQ0220101505720105057580981.table002i777764077760771T1O181BaghdadM/47
IRQ02201024897b2010 4897b580981.table002i1677767377413771EAI5O192BasraM/21
IRQ0220102425820104258580981.table002j503767740003761CAS1-DelhiO202BaghdadM/54
IRQ0220101428720104287580981.table002j1777727777420771H3 (Ural-1)O211Dhi-qar F/51
IRQ0220101643220106432580981.table002k775767600760771T1O221BaghdadM/60
IRQ0220101443320104433580981.table002k1503667700003771CASO231BabilM/23
IRQ0220101603820106038580981.table002l757767637763771Manu2O241BaghdadM/28
IRQ0220101339120103391580981.table002l1777727777000771UnknownO251BaghdadM/31
IRQ0220111359220113592580981.table002m503767400001771CASO261BaghdadM/21
IRQ0220111323420113234580981.table002m1777767777722771Manu2O271Dhi-qar M/40
IRQ0220100417920104179580981.table002n677767637563771Manu2O280BaghdadM/25
IRQ0220101608220106082580981.table002n1777766607760771LAM9O291BaghdadF/24
IRQ0220110316420113164580981.table002o777766637760771X1O300BaghdadM/24
IRQ0220101272920102729580981.table002o1701767700003071CASO311Dhi-qar M/65
IRQ0220101509520105095580981.table002p403767400001771UnknownO321Najaf M/70
IRQ0220101458420104584580981.table002p1577767777520771H3O331Baghdad F/18
IRQ0220100432620104326580981.table002q777767770000771UnknownO340BaghdadM/25
IRQ0220111354320113543580981.table002q1501767740003071CASO351BaghdadM/22
IRQ02201026360b20106360b580981.table002r577767600760771T1O362BasraM/35
IRQ0220101488520104885580981.table002r1577737777520771H3O371Baghdad M/29
IRQ0220102691520106915580981.table002s743767740003171UnknownO382Salah M/37
IRQ0220101599620105996580981.table002s1757767400741771UnknownO391BaghdadM/20
IRQ0220101476120104761580981.table002t500000000000000CASO401Baghdad F/56
IRQ0220111327520113275580981.table002t1703767400003071CASO411Salah M/30
IRQ0220100430920104309580981.table002u503767740003000CAS1-DelhiO420Salah M/37
IRQ0220101600520106005580981.table002u1757767777720771H3O431BaghdadF/54
IRQ0220112342920113429580981.table002v501727740003071CASO442BaghdadM/53
IRQ0220111367220113672580981.table002v1703767740000171CASO451Dhi-qar M/58
IRQ0220101729720107297580981.table002w703727740003111CAS1-DelhiO461KerbalaM/24
IRQ0220101385220103852580981.table002w1703767740003661CAS1-DelhiO471BaghdadM/20
IRQ0220101513720105137580981.table002x575767737760671T1O481BaghdadM/25
IRQ0220101210420102104580981.table002x1757777744743771UnknownO491Dhi-qar M/65
IRQ0220101381120103811580981.table002y757767777743771UnknownO501BaghdadF/35
IRQ0220111348420113484580981.table002y1577727777420771H4 (Ural-2)O511BaghdadF/53
IRQ0220111232620112326580981.table002z557767777743771UnknownO521Dhi-qar M/56
IRQ0220101651120106511580981.table002z1555727604643071UnknownO531WasitM/30

Lineage designations for orphan patterns were done manually as expert-based interpretations using revised SpolDB4 rules.
**Drug resistance (drug R) information is shown as 0, unknown; 1, non-MDR; 2, MDRTB, that is, combined resistance to INH − RIF (with or without resistance to other drugs); 3, any other resistance(s); 4, proven XDRTB, that is, resistance to INH + RIF + a fluoroquinolone + any 1 of 3 injectable 2nd-line drugs (capreomycin, kanamycin, amikacin).

SIT*Spoligotype descriptionOctal numberNb in study% in study% in study versus databaseLineage**Clustered versus unique patterns***

4580981.table003a00000000776077110.370.28UnknownUnique
20580981.table003a167777760776077110.370.12LAM1Unique
22580981.table003a270377740000177182.9610.26CAS1-DelhiClustered
25580981.table003b703777740003171103.71.77CAS1-DelhiClustered
26580981.table003b1703777740003771124.440.87CAS1-DelhiClustered
34580981.table003b277637777776077110.370.12SUnique
41580981.table003c77777740476077110.370.21LAM7-TURUnique
42580981.table003c177777760776077110.370.03LAM9Unique
47580981.table003c277777777402077110.370.07H1Unique
50580981.table003d77777777772077162.220.18H3Clustered
53580981.table003d177777777776077151.850.08T1Clustered
54580981.table003d277777777776377182.963.31Manu2Clustered
64580981.table003e77777760756077110.370.28LAM6Unique
75580981.table003e177776777772077162.228.7H3Clustered
117580981.table003e277776777776073120.748T2Clustered
118580981.table003f77776777776077162.223.9T1Clustered
124580981.table003f177777777770077110.371.54UnknownUnique
127580981.table003f257777777742077162.223.08H4 (Ural-2)Clustered
141580981.table003g70376774000377193.3328.13CAS1-DelhiClustered
186580981.table003g177776740476077110.378.33LAM7-TURUnique
247580981.table003g270377774000347131.118.11CAS1-DelhiClustered
284580981.table003h03763777776077193.335.11T1Clustered
309580981.table003h1703767740003171176.380.95CAS1-DelhiClustered
485580981.table003h270377740000377110.374CAS1-DelhiUnique
516580981.table003i77777777736077110.375.56T1Unique
568580981.table003i177776747776077110.3720T-H37RvUnique
610580981.table003i277776777402073110.3714.29H1Unique
831580981.table003j77636777776077110.377.69SUnique
878580981.table003j177777677776057110.374X1Unique
954580981.table003j270367774000377110.376.67CAS1-DelhiUnique
1088580981.table003k77776777776377141.4833.33Manu2Clustered
1144580981.table003k1777777600760771176.341.46T1Clustered
1198580981.table003k270373774000317141.4810.53CAS1-DelhiClustered
1318580981.table003l57776777776077120.7425T1Clustered
1470580981.table003l177777660776077120.7410LAM9Clustered
1547580981.table003l277772777776077131.1127.27T3Clustered
1630580981.table003m77777760176077110.3716.67T1Unique
1638580981.table003m157776777776377110.3733.33Manu2Unique
1655580981.table003n77772377776077110.372.7T3Unique
1679580981.table003n177776773776077120.7420T1Clustered
1913580981.table003o77776775776077110.3725T5Unique
2032580981.table003o103762777776077110.3720T1Unique
2230580981.table003p77770007776077110.3716.67UnknownUnique
2359580981.table003p170367774000317110.374.55CAS1-DelhiUnique
2686580981.table003q70376774000347141.4866.67CAS1-DelhiClustered
2691580981.table003q103773777776077110.3720T3Unique
2707580981.table003r70176774000367110.3733.33CASUnique
2728580981.table003r157776777742077131.1150H4 (Ural-2)Clustered
3275*580981.table003s70003777776073110.3750T2Unique
3346*580981.table003s1777767600760771114.07100T1Clustered
3497*580981.table003t70376740000177182.96100CASClustered
3708*580981.table003t170376774000376131.11100CAS1-DelhiClustered
3789*580981.table003u77777774076377120.7466.67Manu2Clustered
3790*580981.table003u177776760036077141.48100T1Clustered
3791*580981.table003v70372774000317141.48100CAS1-DelhiClustered
3792*580981.table003v170376764000377120.7466.67CAS1-DelhiClustered
3793*580981.table003w55776777776377110.3750Manu2Unique
3794*580981.table003w170376774000077110.3750CASUnique
3795*580981.table003x27776760776077110.3750LAM1Unique
3796*580981.table003x170376774000037110.3750CASUnique
3797*580981.table003y77777777412077110.3750H3Unique
3798*580981.table003y177771777776037110.3750T1Unique
3799*580981.table003z77776761476077110.3750T1Unique
3800*580981.table003z170376740000377120.74100CASClustered

A total of 48/64 SITs containing 173 isolates matched a preexisting shared type in the database, whereas 16/64 SITs ( isolates) were newly created. A total of 31/64 SITs containing 184 isolates were clustered within this study (2 to 17 isolates per cluster) while 33/64 SITs containing 33 strains were unique (for total unique strains, one should add to this number the 53 orphan strains, which brings the number of unclustered isolates in this study to 86/270 or 31.85% and clustered isolates to 184/270 or 68.15%). Note that SITs followed by an asterisk indicates “newly created” SITs due to 2 or more strains belonging to an identical new pattern within this study or after a match with an orphan in the database; SIT designations followed by number of strains: 3275* this study , FXX ; 3346* this study ; 3497* this study ; 3708* this study ; 3789* this study , IRQ ; 3790* this study ; 3791* this study ; 3792* this study , IND ; 3793* this study , IND ; 3794* this study , IND ; 3795* this study , BRA ; 3796* this study , PAK ; 3797* this study , MEX ; 3798* this study , IRQ ; 3799* this study , BRA ; 3800* this study .
**Lineage designations according to SITVIT2 using revised SpolDB4 rules; “unknown” designates patterns with signatures that do not belong to any of the major lineages described in the database.
***Clustered strains correspond to a similar spoligotype pattern shared by 2 or more strains “within this study,” as opposed to unique strains harboring a spoligotype pattern that does not match with another strain from this study. Unique strains matching a preexisting pattern in the SITVIT2 database are classified as SITs, whereas in case of no match, they are designated as “orphan” (see Table 2).

Nearly 94.1% of the isolates belonged to known genotype clades. These include, in decreasing order: CAS 39.6%, ill-defined T clade 29.6%, Manu 7.4%, Haarlem 7%, Ural 4.1%, LAM 3.3%, X 0.7%, LAM7-TUR 0.7%, EAI 0.7%, S 0.7%, and unknown 5.9%. This observation on the complex diversity of M. tuberculosis in Iraq was further supported by the minimum spanning tree (MST) illustrated in Figure 1, which was constructed on all isolates (, including 53 orphan patterns).

As shown in Figure 1, the CAS lineage strains constitute the biggest group of strains infecting Iraqi patients; the major shared types being SIT309, 26, 141, 25, 3497, and 22. At a considerable distance is seen a separate group of strains made up of smaller nodes: T lineage (SIT1144, 3346, 284, 118, 53), Haarlem (SIT75, 50), LAM (SIT42, 1470), Ural (SIT127), and Manu (SIT54). Even smaller nodes concerned other lineages such as Turkey, S, X, and the ancestral EAI lineages. Indeed, as many as 129/270 (47.7%) strains from this study belonged to Principal Genetic Group 1 (PGG1), according to the KatG-gyrA polymorphism-based classification of Sreevatsan et al. [19], and these strains represent all of known lineages associated with PGG1 strains (CAS, Manu, and EAI with the exception of Beijing). However, evolutionary modern PGG2/3 strains constitute a high proportion in this study such as ill-defined T, Haarlem, Ural, LAM, LAM7-TUR, S, and X. These strains accounted for 125/270 (46.3%) of the studied strains.

A total of 31/64 SITs containing 184 strains were clustered within this study (2 to 17 strains per cluster) while 33/64 SITs containing 33 strains were unique. For total unique strains, one should add to this number the 53 orphan strains, which brings the number of unclustered strains in this study to 86/270 or 31.85% and clustered strains to 184/270 or 68.15%. 23 clusters are shown in Table 3, along with 8 additional clusters (2 to 11 strains per cluster) represented by the newly created shared types.

The two largest clusters of 17 strains were composed of SIT309 (CAS1-Delhi lineage) and SIT1144 (T1 lineage).

Description of clusters containing 5 or more isolates in this study, and their worldwide distribution in the SITVIT2 database, is detailed in Table 4 and will be commented further under the discussion section.


SIT (lineage) octal number
Spoligotype description
Number (%) in study% in study versus databaseDistribution in regions with ≥3% of a given SIT*Distribution in countries with ≥3% of a given SIT**

580981.table004a8 (2.96)10.26ASIA-W 65.39, ASIA-S 12.82, AFRI-E 7.69, EURO-N 5.13, EURO-W 3.85SAU 38.46, IRQ 25.64, IRN 7.69, TZA 3.85
580981.table004b10 (3.7)1.77AFRI-E 26.68, ASIA-W 22.26, AFRI-N 14.84, ASIA-S 13.6, AMER-N 9.19, EURO-N 4.95, EURO-W 4.77ETH 25.44, SAU 16.61, SDN 12.19, USA 9.19, IND 8.66, IRQ 5.12, IRN 3.0
580981.table004c12 (4.44)0.87ASIA-S 54.08, AMER-N 15.81, ASIA-W 7.51, EURO-W 6.14, AFRI-E 5.13, EURO-N 4.19, EURO-S 3.61IND 33.0, USA 15.81, PAK 10.4, SAU 5.63, BGD 5.42, IRN 4.48, ITA 3.47, NLD 3.11, ETH 3.11
580981.table004d6 (2.22)0.18AMER-S 18.03, EURO-W 17.88, AMER-N 17.88, EURO-S 11.75, EURO-E 5.62, EURO-N 4.36, AFRI-N 4.33, AFRI-S 4.12, CARI 3.55, ASIA-W 3.19USA 17.85, BRA 7.18, FXX 7.0, AUT 6.19, ITA 5.53, ESP 5.53, PER 4.81, ZAF 4.12, CZE 3.73
580981.table004e5 (1.85)0.08EURO-W 16.17, AMER-N 13.93, AMER-S 12.43, EURO-S 9.72, ASIA-W 7.19, EURO-N 5.51, AFRI-S 5.13, AFRI-E 4.66, ASIA-E 4.38, AFRI-N 3.64, EURO-E 3.37, AMER-C 3.34USA 13.64, FXX 8.14, ITA 5.51, BRA 5.3, ZAF 5.02, TUR 3.59, AUT 3.54, CHN 3.19
580981.table004f8 (2.96)3.31ASIA-W 16.53, ASIA-S 15.29, ASIA-E 15.29, AFRI-N 14.88, AMER-N 8.26, AFRI-S 6.61, ASIA-N 4.13, AMER-S 3.72CHN 15.29, IND 14.46, EGY 14.05, USA 8.26, SAU 8.26, ZAF 6.61, IRQ 5.79, RUS 4.13
580981.table004g6 (2.22)8.7AMER-S 18.84, ASIA-W 15.94, EURO-W 11.59, ASIA-S 10.15, EURO-S 7.25, AMER-N 7.25, AFRI-M 7.25, AFRI-E 5.8, EURO-E 4.35, CARI 4.35, AFRI-W 4.35IRN 10.15, FXX 10.15, BRA 10.15, IRQ 8.7, USA 7.25, CMR 7.25, TUR 4.35, MDG 4.35, GUF 4.35, ARG 4.35
580981.table004h6 (2.22)3.9ASIA-W 18.83, EURO-W 17.53, AMER-S 13.64, EURO-S 9.74, ASIA-E 9.74, AMER-N 5.2, AFRI-E 5.2, EURO-E 4.55, AMER-C 4.55FXX 15.58, TUR 12.34, ITA 6.49, VEN 5.84, CHN 5.84, USA 5.2, MOZ 4.55, JPN 3.9, IRQ 3.9, CZE 3.9, BRA 3.9, MEX 3.25, ARG 3.25
580981.table004i6 (2.22)3.08ASIA-S 54.36, EURO-W 16.41, ASIA-W 11.8, EURO-N 5.64, ASIA-E 5.13IRN 49.23, NLD 7.69, SAU 6.15, IRQ 5.13, CHN 5.13, SWE 4.62, AUT 4.62, DEU 3.59
580981.table004j9 (3.33)28.13ASIA-S 37.5, ASIA-W 31.25, EURO-W 12.5, AMER-N 12.5, ASIA-SE 3.13, AFRI-E 3.13IND 34.38, IRQ 28.13, USA 12.5, FXX 9.38, SAU 3.13, PAK 3.13, NLD 3.13, MOZ 3.13, MMR 3.13
580981.table004k9 (3.33)5.11ASIA-W 42.61, EURO-E 22.73, EURO-W 15.91, EURO-N 7.39, EURO-S 3.41BGR 22.73, TUR 19.89, SAU 13.07, IRQ 9.09, SWE 6.25, AUT 5.68, FXX 3.41
580981.table004l17 (6.3)80.95ASIA-W 85.71, AFRI-M 9.52, AFRI-E 4.76IRQ 80.95, CAF 9.52, SAU 4.76, ETH 4.76
580981.table004m17 (6.3)41.46ASIA-W 90.24, AMER-N 4.88IRQ 90.24, USA 4.88
580981.table004n11 (4.07)100ASIA-W 100.0IRQ 100.0
580981.table004o8 (2.96)100ASIA-W 100.0IRQ 100.0

Worldwide distribution is reported for regions with more than 3% of a given SITs as compared to their total number in the SITVIT2 database. The definition of macrogeographical regions and subregions (http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm) is according to the United Nations; regions: AFRI (Africa), AMER (Americas), ASIA (Asia), EURO (Europe), and OCE (Oceania) are subdivided in E (eastern), M (middle), C (central), N (northern), S (southern), SE (south eastern), and W (western). Furthermore, CARIB (caribbean) belongs to Americas, while Oceania is subdivided in 4 subregions, AUST (Australasia), MEL (Melanesia), MIC (Micronesia), and POLY (Polynesia). Note that in our classification scheme, Russia has been attributed a new subregion by itself (northern Asia) instead of including it among the rest of eastern Europe. It reflects its geographical localization as well as due to the similarity of specific TB genotypes circulating in Russia (a majority of Beijing genotypes) with those prevalent in central, eastern, and south eastern Asia.
**The 3 letter country codes are according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1_alpha-3; countrywide distribution is only shown for SITs with ≥3% of a given SITs as compared to their total number in the SITVIT2 database.

The MIRU-VNTR analysis detected a total of 73 MIRU patterns from 110 strains using the full 24 MIRU-VNTR locus set, including 17 clusters and 56 unique (Figure 2). Allelic diversity for each locus was calculated in order to determine the discriminatory power of these loci in a combined group for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis population studied. Based on their discriminatory index (HGDI), 7 loci (MIRU02, MIRU04, MIRU20, Mtub29, ETR-B, MIRU24, and MIRU27) showed poor discriminatory power (HGDI < 0.3). Seven loci (MIRU 23, Qub11b, Mtub30, Mtub34, Mtub39, MIRU 39, and QUB 4156) discriminated the isolated moderately (0.3 ≤ HGDI ≤ 0.6). Lastly, 10 loci (Mtub 04, ETR-C, MIRU 40, MIRU 10, MIRU 16, Mtub21, ETR-A, MIRU 26, MIRU 31, and QUB-26) were highly discriminative (HGDI > 0.6). In this study the locus QUB-26 was found to be the most discriminatory allele in order to distinguish between strains (HGDI of 0.83). Conversely, locus MIRU-24 was found to be the least discriminatory with an HGDI of 0.03. The Recent Transmission Index (RTIn−1) was found at 33.6% showing evidence of ongoing transmission.

3.3. Drug Resistance Patterns

Both the drug resistance patterns and the treatment status of the patients (new versus retreated cases) were studied in detail on all the 270 strains included in this study in function of their spoligotyping-based genotypic lineages, and the results were concomitantly exploited to draw a minimum spanning tree (MST) shown in Figure 3. Of the 270 strains studied, 171 (63.3%) were sensitive to all five of the first-line drugs tested, 64 (23.70%) were MDR, while the drug-susceptibility information was not available for 35 (12.96%) of strains. Regarding the treatment status of the patients, 187 (69.26%) were new cases while 83 (30.74%) were previously treated. It is noteworthy that all the 64 MDR cases were exclusively found among the retreated patients, bringing the proportion of MDR isolates in this group to 77.1% the difference of drug resistance between new versus retreated cases being highly significant ( value < 0.0001). As shown in Figure 3(a), a high frequency of MDR-TB was associated with SIT53/T1 which contained 60% of MDR strains. Interestingly, this same shared type was also exclusively associated with retreated cases (Figure 3(b)). Although the clustering rate between drug susceptible and drug resistant isolates did not vary significantly ( value > 0.4), differences were noted when comparing predominant SITs. Indeed, one may notice a relatively high frequency of MDR-TB among patterns related to SIT53/T1 (60% of MDR) in Figure 3(a), which was significantly higher than other SITs such as SIT26/CAS1-Delhi (16.67% of MDR), value = 0.0372, and SIT141/CAS1-Delhi (11.11% of MDR), value = 0.0030. Lastly, although the rate of MDR-TB was slightly higher among patients from cities other than Baghdad (Table 1), the difference was not statistically significant ( value = 0.1224).

4. Discussion

In this study we characterized, by spoligotyping, 270 M. tuberculosis isolates collected from patients diagnosed in Baghdad/Reference TB laboratory in a 13-month period. One hundred and ten samples were also characterized by 24-loci MIRU-VNTR.

All TB cases reported in this study were caused by M. tuberculosis. The molecular investigation of strain by spoligotyping did not show the specific indicator for other members of M. tuberculosis complex such as M. bovis. This situation has been described in other settings and countries such as by Godreuil et al. in west African countries [20], Nakajima et al. in Bangladesh [21], and Viegas in Mozambique [22]. Spoligotyping of the 270 M. tuberculosis strains revealed 31 clusters consisting of 184 strains, with clustering rate 57%, whereas 86 strains were unique.

One hundred and seven (39.6%) of the 270 studied strains were CAS belonging to different SITs. CAS has also been identified as predominant family in Saudi Arabia (22.5%) and also the predominance of Delhi genogroup in Iran [23, 24] was reported. In Pakistan this lineage represents 61% of the total [25]. And CAS has been also identified by recent study as a predominant strain in north India [26]. The data from Turkey suggested that there is no dominant M. tuberculosis clade such as what has been observed in Asia and former USSR republics [17]. CAS clade is followed, in decreasing order, by ill-defined T clade 29.6%, Manu 7.4%, Haarlem 7%, Ural 4.1%, LAM 3.3%, X 0.7%, LAM7-TUR 0.7%, EAI 0.7%, S 0.7%, and unknown 5.9% (Table 4). These observations emphasize the complex diversity of circulating M. tuberculosis strains in Iraq that could reflect the different transmission pathways occurring within the country. Besides, it has been suggested that particular lineages of M. tuberculosis might be adapted to specific human population [27, 28]. Indeed, many strains of this study belonged to Principal Genetic Group (PGG1), according to the KatG-grA polymorphism-based classification of Sreevatsan et al. [19], and these strains represent all of the known lineages associated with PGG1 with the exception of the Beijing clade. However, evolutionary modern PGG 2/3 strains were also found with different distribution.

In this study 110 strains were classified into 73 MIRU patterns of which 17 were clusters and 56 unique strains. The high level of Recent Transmission Index (RTI), at 33.6%, indicates that the most cases are due to recent transmissions rather than reactivation of M. tuberculosis infections. In our study, ten loci (Mtub 04, ETR-C, MURU 40, MIRU 10, MIRU 16, Mtub21, ETR-A, MIRU 26, MIRU 31, and QUB-26) were highly discriminatory (HGDI > 0.6), seven loci (MIRU23, Qub11b, Mtub30, Mtub34, Mtub39, MIRU 39, and QUB 4156) moderately discriminate (0.3 ≤ HGDI ≤ 0.6), and seven loci (MIRU02, MIRU04, MIRU20, Mtub 29, ETR-B, MIRU 24, and MIRU27) showed poor discriminatory power (HGDI < 0.3).

MIRU-VNTR allelic results have been correlated with definition of ancestral and modern MTB lineages, with the presence of single allele in locus 24 being related to a modern strain type. We found that 98% of our strains contained only single repeat at locus 24, further confirming their modern lineage. This is comparable with previous reports for CAS strain from Bangladesh and Singapore [29, 30] and also with the studies from Pakistan and Bulgaria as supported by the finding that 62% of their CAS family strains contained only one allele at the locus 24 [31, 32]. Moreover, the relative discriminatory powers of particular VNTR loci vary depending on the strain in question [3337].

This study found that in Iraqi population, the characteristic of MDR in M. tuberculosis is mostly acquired as a result of treatment failure, due to irregularity in taking of drug (anti-TB), neglect, and incorrect prescriptions. Although the extremely high level of MDR among previously treated patients might indicate transmission chains within the population, molecular epidemiology revealed that except for SIT53/T1 genotype, no significant differences were found and the MIRU analysis in the subset of strains did not show clusters of exclusively MDR strains. The fact that identical MIRU patterns were shared both by MDR and non-MDR strains, and that the isoniazid and rifampicin resistance patterns were independent of their genotypes, suggests that MDR strains most probably emerged due to the selective pressure because of problems in adherence to treatment (in addition to other environmental factors), (high population, poor housing, overcrowding, and malnutrition).

The data of this study provide important baseline information on the genetic diversity of M. tuberculosis in Iraq. Therefore, it could be used to monitor change in the transmission pattern of tuberculosis. Spoligotyping has been proved useful for categorizing strains into different families and can be used as an initial technique to be subsequently followed by MIRU-VNTR. This study showed that 24-loci MIRU-VNTR typing offers a higher discriminatory power. Iraq needs to conduct epidemiological survey by using conventional and genotyping methods in order to provide adequate data that can be used for the formulation of control strategies of tuberculosis transmission.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Nalin Rastogi and Daniela M. Cirillo contributed equally to this paper.

Acknowledgment

Ruqaya Mustafa Ali would like to thank Baghdad University, Iraq, for funding and support.

References

  1. WHO, “Global tuberculosis control,” WHO Report, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  2. Ministry of Health of Iraq, “New diagnosis of tuberculosis in Iraq,” Tech. Rep., Ministry of Health of Iraq, Baghdad, Iraq, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  3. B. Mathema, N. E. Kurepina, P. J. Bifani, and B. N. Kreiswirth, “Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis: current insights,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 658–685, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. I. S. Kontsevaya, V. V. Nikolayevsky, and Y. M. Balabanova, “Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis: objectives, methods, and prospects,” Molecular Genetics, Microbiology and Virology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. P. Supply, S. Lesjean, E. Savine, K. Kremer, D. van Soolingen, and C. Locht, “Automated high-throughput genotyping for study of global epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 3563–3571, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. S. Cowan, L. Diem, T. Monson et al., “Evaluation of a two-step approach for large-scale, prospective genotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in the United States,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 688–695, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. P. Supply, C. Allix, S. Lesjean et al., “Proposal for standardization of optimized mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 4498–4510, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Thong-On, N. Smittipat, T. Juthayothin et al., “Variable-number tandem repeats typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates with low copy numbers of IS6110 in Thailand,” Tuberculosis, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T. Wirth, F. Hildebrand, C. Allix-Béguec et al., “Origin, spread and demography of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 4, no. 9, Article ID e1000160, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Cardoso Oelemann, H. M. Gomes, E. Willery et al., “The forest behind the tree: phylogenetic exploration of a dominant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain lineage from a high tuberculosis burden country,” PloS ONE, vol. 6, no. 3, Article ID e18256, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. H. David, V. Levy-Frébault, and M. F. Thorel, Méthodes de laboratoire de mycobactériologie clinique, Commission des Laboratoires de Référence et d’Expertise de l’Institut Pasteur, Paris, France, 1989.
  12. D. van Soolingen, P. W. M. Hermans, P. E. W. de Haas, D. R. Soll, and J. D. A. van Embden, “Occurrence and stability of insertion sequences in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains: evaluation of an insertion sequence-dependent DNA polymorphism as a tool in the epidemiology of tuberculosis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 2578–2586, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  13. J. Kamerbeek, L. Schouls, A. Kolk et al., “Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 907–914, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  14. K. Brudey, J. R. Driscoll, L. Rigouts et al., “Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex genetic diversity: mining the fourth international spoligotyping database (SpolDB4) for classification, population genetics and epidemiology,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 6, article 23, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C. Demay, B. Liens, T. Burguière et al., “SITVITWEB—a publicly available international multimarker database for studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis genetic diversity and molecular epidemiology,” Infection, Genetics and Evolution, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 755–766, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. F. Koro Koro, Y. K. Simo, F. F. Piam et al., “Population dynamics of tuberculous Bacilli in Cameroon as assessed by spoligotyping,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 299–302, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  17. O. Kisa, G. Tarhan, S. Gunal et al., “Distribution of spoligotyping defined genotypic lineages among drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex clinical isolates in Ankara, Turkey,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID e30331, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. I. Mokrousov, “The quiet and controversial: ural family of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Infection, Genetics and Evolution, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 619–629, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Sreevatsan, X. Pan, K. E. Stockbauer et al., “Restricted structural gene polymorphism in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex indicates evolutionarily recent global dissemination,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 18, pp. 9869–9874, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Godreuil, G. Torrea, D. Terru et al., “First molecular epidemiology study of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Burkina Faso,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 921–927, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. C. Nakajima, Z. Rahim, Y. Fukushima et al., “Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates in Bangladesh by a species distinguishable multiplex PCR,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 10, article 118, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. O. Viegas, A. Machado, R. Groenheit et al., “Molecular diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Mozambique,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 10, article 195, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  23. S. A. Al-Hajoj, “Tuberculosis in Saudi Arabia: can we change the way we deal with the disease?” Journal of Infection and Public Health, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Jafarian, M. Aghali-Merza, P. Farnia, M. Ahmadi, M. R. Masjedi, and A. A. Velayati, “Synchronous comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis epidemiology strains by MIRU-VNTR and MIRU-VNTR and spoligotyping technique,” Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 145–152, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  25. M. Tanveer, Z. Hasan, A. R. Siddiqui et al., “Genotyping and drug resistance patterns of M. tuberculosis strains in Pakistan,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 8, article 171, pp. 2–10, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Varma-Basil, S. Kumar, J. Arora et al., “Comparison of spoligotyping, mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units typing and IS6110-RFLP in a study of genotypic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Delhi, North India,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz Rio de Janeiro, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 524–535, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Z. H. Helal, M. S. E.-D. Ashour, S. A. Eissa et al., “Unexpectedly high proportion of ancestral manu genotype Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains cultured from tuberculosis patients in Egypt,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 2794–2801, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. Gagneux, K. DeRiemer, T. Van et al., “Variable host-pathogen compatibility in Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 2869–2873, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Banu, S. V. Gordon, S. Palmer et al., “Genotypic analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in bangladesh and prevalence of the Beijing strain,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 674–682, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Y.-J. Sun, R. Bellamy, A. S. G. Lee et al., “Use of mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem repeat typing to examine genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Singapore,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1986–1993, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. Ali, Z. Hasan, M. Tanveer et al., “Characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis central Asian Strain 1 using mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit genotyping,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 7, article 76, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. V. Valcheva, I. Mokrousov, O. Narvskaya, N. Rastogi, and N. Markova, “Utility of new 24-locus variable-number tandem-repeat typing for discriminating Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates collected in Bulgaria,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 3005–3011, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. Murase, S. Mitarai, I. Sugawara, S. Kato, and S. Maeda, “Promising loci of variable numbers of tandem repeats for typing Beijing family Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 873–880, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. I. Comas, S. Homolka, S. Niemann, and S. Gagneux, “Genotyping of genetically monomorphic bacteria: DNA sequencing in Mycobacterium tuberculosis highlights the limitations of current methodologies,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 11, Article ID e7815, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. Ferdinand, G. Valétudie, C. Sola, and N. Rastogi, “Data mining of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex genotyping results using mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units validates the clonal structure of spoligotyping-defined families,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 155, no. 8, pp. 647–654, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Aminian, A. Shabbeer, and K. P. Bennett, “A conformal Bayesian network for classification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex lineages,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 11, supplement 3, article S4, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. N. H. Mendes, F. A. F. Melo, A. C. B. Santos et al., “Characterization of the genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in São Paulo city, Brazil,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 4, article 269, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Ruqaya Mustafa Ali et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

2742 Views | 1129 Downloads | 6 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.