Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 608579, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/608579
Research Article

Metabolomic Prediction of Pregnancy Viability in Superovulated Cattle Embryos and Recipients with Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

1Centro de Biotecnología Animal-SERIDA, Camino de Rioseco 1225, La Olla-Deva, Gijón, 33394 Asturias, Spain
2Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, 310 Cedar Street, LSOG 304B, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
3Department of Computer Engineering, Okan University, Tuzla, 34959 Istanbul, Turkey
4UNCEIA, Department of Research and Development, 13 rue Jouet, 94704 Maisons Alfort, France
5UNCEIA, Station Expérimentale, 484 Chemin Darefin, 38300 Chateauvillain, France
6U.T.E. Bos-Lugar de Bos, Guísamo, Bergondo, 15640 A Coruña, Spain
7EMBRIOVET S.L., Rois 18 K, Bergondo, 15165 A Coruña, Spain
8Servicios Científico Técnicos (Oviedo), Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, 33006 Asturias, Spain
9Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 7054, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden

Received 24 February 2014; Accepted 30 March 2014; Published 15 April 2014

Academic Editor: Luigi Barberini

Copyright © 2014 Marta Muñoz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Ponsart, D. le Bourhis, H. Knijn et al., “Reproductive technologies and genomic selection in dairy cattle,” Reproduction, Fertility and Development, vol. 26, pp. 12–21, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  2. P. Humblot, D. le Bourhis, S. Fritz et al., “Reproductive technologies and genomic selection in cattle,” Veterinary Medicine International, vol. 2010, Article ID 192787, 8 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. P. W. Farin, J. H. Britt, D. W. Shaw, and B. D. Slenning, “Agreement among evaluators of bovine embryos produced in vivo or in vitro,” Theriogenology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 339–349, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. W. Farin, B. D. Slenning, and J. H. Britt, “Estimates of pregnancy outcomes based on selection of bovine embryos produced in vivo or in vitro,” Theriogenology, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 659–670, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. El-Sayed, M. Hoelker, F. Rings et al., “Large-scale transcriptional analysis of bovine embryo biopsies in relation to pregnancy success after transfer to recipients,” Physiological Genomics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 84–96, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. Ghanem, D. Salilew-Wondim, A. Gad et al., “Bovine blastocysts with developmental competence to term share similar expression of developmentally important genes although derived from different culture environments,” Reproduction, vol. 142, no. 4, pp. 551–564, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Salilew-Wondim, M. Hölker, F. Rings et al., “Bovine pretransfer endometrium and embryo transcriptome fingerprints as predictors of pregnancy success after embryo transfer,” Physiological Genomics, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 201–218, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. H. Alvarez, C. R. Cardoso, G. Butzke, and R. V. Sousa, “273 Bovine embryo sexing in field conditions: efficacy of the polymerase chain reaction method and pregnancy rates in dairy herds located in the South and southeast regions of Brazil,” Reproduction, Fertility and Development, vol. 25, pp. 284–285, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  9. R. J. Mapletoft and J. F. Hasler, “Assisted reproductive technologies in cattle: a review,” OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 393–403, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. K. Gardner, P. L. Wale, R. Collins, and M. Lane, “Glucose consumption of single post-compaction human embryos is predictive of embryo sex and live birth outcome,” Human Reproduction, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1981–1986, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. K. Gardner, M. Lane, J. Stevens, and W. B. Schoolcraft, “Noninvasive assessment of human embryo nutrient consumption as a measure of developmental potential,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 1175–1180, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. P. Urbanski, M. T. Johnson, D. D. Craig, D. L. Potter, D. K. Gardner, and T. Thorsen, “Noninvasive metabolic profiling using microfluidics for analysis of single preimplantation embryos,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 80, no. 17, pp. 6500–6507, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. S. Lopes, L. H. Larsen, N. Ramsing et al., “Respiration rates of individual bovine in vitro-produced embryos measured with a novel, non-invasive and highly sensitive microsensor system,” Reproduction, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 669–679, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. S. Lopes, S. E. Madsen, N. B. Ramsing, P. Løvendahl, T. Greve, and H. Callesen, “Investigation of respiration of individual bovine embryos produced in vivo and in vitro and correlation with viability following transfer,” Human Reproduction, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 558–566, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. R. Brison, F. D. Houghton, D. Falconer et al., “Identification of viable embryos in IVF by non-invasive measurement of amino acid turnover,” Human Reproduction, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 2319–2324, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. G. Sturmey, P. Bermejo-Alvarez, A. Gutierrez-Adan, D. Rizos, H. J. Leese, and P. Lonergan, “Amino acid metabolism of bovine blastocysts: a biomarker of sex and viability,” Molecular Reproduction and Development, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 285–296, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. F. Domínguez, B. Gadea, F. J. Esteban, J. A. Horcajadas, A. Pellicer, and C. Simón, “Comparative protein-profile analysis of implanted versus non-implanted human blastocysts,” Human Reproduction, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1993–2000, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. G. Katz-Jaffe, S. McReynolds, D. K. Gardner, and W. B. Schoolcraft, “The role of proteomics in defining the human embryonic secretome,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 271–277, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Sugimura, T. Akai, Y. Hashiyada et al., “Promising system for selecting healthy in vitro-fertilized embryos in cattle,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, Article ID e36627, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  20. C. O. Hidalgo, E. Gómez, L. Prieto et al., “Pregnancy rates and metabolic profiles in cattle treated with propylene glycol prior to embryo transfer,” Theriogenology, vol. 62, no. 3-4, pp. 664–676, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Humblot, J. Perrin, N. Jeanguyot, M. Nibart, and M. Thibier, “Effects of age and quality of thawed embryos, synchronization and corpus luteum function on pregnancy rates of bovine embryo recipients,” Theriogenology, vol. 27, p. 240, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  22. L. G. B. Siqueira, C. A. A. Torres, E. D. Souza et al., “Pregnancy rates and corpus luteum-related factors affecting pregnancy establishment in bovine recipients synchronized for fixed-time embryo transfer,” Theriogenology, vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 949–958, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. R. Spell, W. E. Beal, L. R. Corah, and G. C. Lamb, “Evaluating recipient and embryo factors that affect pregnancy rates of embryo transfer in beef cattle,” Theriogenology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 287–297, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. T. Yoshida, M. Seki, N. Watanabe et al., “Relation of reproductive performances and rectal palpation for luteum function of heifers 7days after estrus,” Animal Science Journal, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 207–212, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. J. Leese, S. A. Hugentobler, S. M. Gray et al., “Female reproductive tract fluids: composition, mechanism of formation and potential role in the developmental origins of health and disease,” Reproduction, Fertility and Development, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. G. Bromer and E. Seli, “Assessment of embryo viability in assisted reproductive technology: shortcomings of current approaches and the emerging role of metabolomics,” Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 234–241, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. I. Ellis, W. B. Dunn, J. L. Griffin, J. W. Allwood, and R. Goodacre, “Metabolic fingerprinting as a diagnostic tool,” Pharmacogenomics, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1243–1266, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. I. Ellis and R. Goodacre, “Metabolic fingerprinting in disease diagnosis: biomedical applications of infrared and Raman spectroscopy,” Analyst, vol. 131, no. 8, pp. 875–885, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. Z. P. Nagy, D. Sakkas, and B. Behr, “Non-invasive assessment of embryo viability by metabolomic profiling of culture media (‘metabolomics’),” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 502–507, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. Scott, E. Seli, K. Miller, D. Sakkas, K. Scott, and D. H. Burns, “Noninvasive metabolomic profiling of human embryo culture media using Raman spectroscopy predicts embryonic reproductive potential: a prospective blinded pilot study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 77–83, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. Seli, L. Botros, D. Sakkas, and D. H. Burns, “Noninvasive metabolomic profiling of embryo culture media using proton nuclear magnetic resonance correlates with reproductive potential of embryos in women undergoing in vitro fertilization,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 2183–2189, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. E. Seli, D. Sakkas, R. Scott, S. C. Kwok, S. M. Rosendahl, and D. H. Burns, “Noninvasive metabolomic profiling of embryo culture media using Raman and near-infrared spectroscopy correlates with reproductive potential of embryos in women undergoing in vitro fertilization,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 1350–1357, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. T. Hardarson, A. Ahlstrm, L. Rogberg et al., “Non-invasive metabolomic profiling of Day 2 and 5 embryo culture medium: a prospective randomized trial,” Human Reproduction, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 89–96, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C. G. Vergouw, D. C. Kieslinger, E. H. Kostelijk et al., “Day 3 embryo selection by metabolomic profiling of culture medium with near-infrared spectroscopy as an adjunct to morphology: a randomized controlled trial,” Human Reproduction, vol. 27, pp. 2304–2311, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  35. M. Muñoz, A. Uyar, E. Correia et al., “Non-invasive assessment of embryonic sex in cattle by metabolic fingerprinting of in vitro culture medium,” Metabolomics, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. A. Uyar and E. Seli, “Embryo assessment strategies and their validation for clinical use: a critical analysis of methodology,” Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 24, pp. 141–150, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. I. H. Witten and E. Frank, Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 2005.
  38. M. Muñoz, F. J. Corrales, J. N. Caamaño et al., “Proteome of the early embryo-maternal dialogue in the cattle uterus,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 11, pp. 751–766, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  39. E. Gómez, J. N. Caamaño, F. J. Corrales et al., “Embryonic sex induces differential expression of proteins in bovine uterine fluid,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 12, pp. 1199–1210, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  40. R. H. Alvarez, M. Meneghel, A. C. Martinez, R. M. L. Pires, and E. A. Schammass, “Transfer of bovine blastocysts derived from short-term in vitro culture of low quality morulae produced in vivo,” Reproduction in Domestic Animals, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 257–260, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. P. W. Farin, J. A. Piedrahita, and C. E. Farin, “Errors in development of fetuses and placentas from in vitro-produced bovine embryos,” Theriogenology, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 178–191, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Schmidt, T. Greve, B. Avery, J. F. Beckers, J. Sulon, and H. B. Hansen, “Pregnancies, calves and calf viability after transfer of in vitro produced bovine embryos,” Theriogenology, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 527–539, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. A. M. van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw, E. Mullaart, A. P. W. de Roos et al., “Effects of different reproduction techniques: AI, MOET or IVP, on health and welfare of bovine offspring,” Theriogenology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 575–597, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. W. H. McMillan, “Potential survival rates to term for transferred in vitro and in vivo derived embryos,” Theriogenology, vol. 45, p. 233, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  45. W. H. McMillan, “Statistical models predicting embryo survival to term in cattle after embryo transfer,” Theriogenology, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1053–1070, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. W. H. McMillan and M. J. Donnison, “Understanding maternal contributions to fertility in recipient cattle: development of herds with contrasting pregnancy rates,” Animal Reproduction Science, vol. 57, no. 3-4, pp. 127–140, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. A. M. Ledgard, S. Meier, and A. J. Peterson, “Evaluation of the uterine environment early in pregnancy establishment to characterise cows with a potentially superior ability to support conceptus survival,” Reproduction, Fertility and Development, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 737–747, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. S. Ponsuksili, E. Murani, M. Schwerin, K. Schellander, D. Tesfaye, and K. Wimmers, “Gene expression and DNA-methylation of bovine pretransfer endometrium depending on its receptivity after in vitro-produced embryo transfer,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, Article ID e42402, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  49. C. G. Walker, M. D. Littlejohn, M. D. Mitchell, J. R. Roche, and S. Meier, “Endometrial gene expression during early pregnancy differs between fertile and subfertile dairy cow strains,” Physiological Genomics, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 47–58, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus