Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 628019, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/628019
Research Article

Effect of Biometric Characteristics on the Change of Biomechanical Properties of the Human Cornea due to Cataract Surgery

1Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66424 Homburg/Saar, Germany
2Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66424 Homburg/Saar, Germany

Received 9 March 2014; Revised 15 May 2014; Accepted 24 May 2014; Published 29 May 2014

Academic Editor: Juan A. Sanchis-Gimeno

Copyright © 2014 Xuefei Song et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. B. Kucumen, N. M. Yenerel, E. Gorgun et al., “Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 2096–2098, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. A. Luce, “Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 156–162, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Shah, M. Laiquzzaman, I. Cunliffe, and S. Mantry, “The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes,” Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 257–262, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Kotecha, A. Elsheikh, C. R. Roberts, H. Zhu, and D. F. Garway-Heath, “Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 5337–5347, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Ortiz, D. Pinero, M. H. Shabayek, F. Arnalich-Montiel, and J. L. Alio, “Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1371–1375, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. Labiris, Z. Gatzioufas, H. Sideroudi, A. Giarmoukakis, V. Kozobolis, and B. Seitz, “Biomechanical diagnosis of keratoconus: evaluation of the keratoconus match index and the keratoconus match probability,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. e258–e262, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. L. Alio, “What does MICS require? The transition to microincisional surgery,” in MICS: Micro-Incision Cataract Surgery, J. L. Alio, J. L. Rodriguez Prats, and A. Galal, Eds., pp. 1–4, Highlights of Ophthalmology International, Panama City, Panama, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  8. J. L. Alió, P. Klonowski, and B. El Kady, “Microincisional lens surgery,” in Cataract and Refractive Surgery: Progress III, T. Kohnen and D. D. Koch, Eds., Essentials in Ophthalmology, pp. 12–26, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. J. M. Martinez-de-la-Casa, J. Garcia-Feijoo, A. Fernandez-Vidal, C. Mendez-Hernandez, and J. Garcia-Sanchez, “Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 4410–4414, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Chatterjee, S. Shah, D. A. Bessant, S. A. Naroo, and S. J. Doyle, “Reduction in intraocular pressure after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy: correlation with pretreatment myopia,” Ophthalmology, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 355–359, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. Kamiya, M. Hagishima, F. Fujimura, and K. Shimizu, “Factors affecting corneal hysteresis in normal eyes,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 246, no. 10, pp. 1491–1494, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. L. Alió, M. C. Agdeppa, J. L. Rodríguez-Prats, F. Amparo, and D. P. Piñero, “Factors influencing corneal biomechanical changes after microincision cataract surgery and standard coaxial phacoemulsification,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 890–897, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. Maeda, S. D. Klyce, M. K. Smolek, and H. W. Thompson, “Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 2749–2757, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. Terai, F. Raiskup, M. Haustein, L. E. Pillunat, and E. Spoerl, “Identification of biomechanical properties of the cornea: the ocular response analyzer,” Current Eye Research, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 553–562, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Hayes, S. Khan, C. Boote et al., “Depth profile study of abnormal collagen orientation in keratoconus corneas,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 251–252, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. M. Meek, S. J. Tuft, Y. Huang et al., “Changes in collagen orientation and distribution in keratoconus corneas,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1948–1956, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Akhtar, A. J. Bron, S. M. Salvi, N. R. Hawksworth, S. J. Tuft, and K. M. Meek, “Ultrastructural analysis of collagen fibrils and proteoglycans in keratoconus,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 86, no. 7, pp. 764–772, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Spörl, N. Terai, M. Haustein, A. G. Böhm, F. Raiskup-Wolf, and L. E. Pillunat, “Biomechanical condition of the cornea as a new indicator for pathological and structural changes,” Ophthalmologe, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 512–520, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y. K. Cho, “Early intraocular pressure and anterior chamber depth changes after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in nonglaucomatous eyes. Comparison of groups stratified by axial length,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1104–1109, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. E. Wilson and S. D. Klyce, “Quantitative descriptors of corneal topography. A clinical study,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 349–353, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. A. Dingeldein, S. D. Klyce, and S. E. Wilson, “Quantitative descriptors of corneal shape derived from computer-assisted analysis of photokeratographs,” Refractive & Corneal Surgery, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 372–378, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. R. Ehrlich, N. M. Radcliffe, and M. Shimmyo, “Goldmann applanation tonometry compared with corneal-compensated intraocular pressure in the evaluation of primary open-angle Glaucoma,” BMC Ophthalmology, vol. 12, no. 1, article 52, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus