Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 671529, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/671529
Research Article

Scotopic Microperimetry in the Early Diagnosis of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Preliminary Study

1Department of Sense Organs, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
2Department of Sense Organs, Ocular Electrophysiology Center, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy
3Department of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Nephrology, Geriatric, and Anesthetic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy

Received 3 August 2014; Revised 14 September 2014; Accepted 17 September 2014; Published 9 December 2014

Academic Editor: Atsushi Mizota

Copyright © 2014 Marcella Nebbioso et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. D. Crossland, V. A. Luong, G. S. Rubin, and F. W. Fitzke, “Retinal specific measurement of dark-adapted visual function: Validation of a modified microperimeter,” BMC Ophthalmology, vol. 11, no. 1, article 5, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Blasiak, G. Petrovski, Z. Veréb, A. Facskó, and K. Kaarniranta, “Oxidative stress, hypoxia, and autophagy in the neovascular processes of age-related macular degeneration,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 768026, 7 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. Pescosolido, Acuità Visiva a Luminanze Ridotte Catania Editore, Società Industria Farmaceutica Italiana, 1992.
  4. Z. Wu, L. N. Ayton, R. H. Guymer, and C. D. Luu, “Low-luminance visual acuity and microperimetry in age-related macular degeneration,” Ophthalmology, vol. 121, pp. 1612–1619, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Cavallotti, M. Artico, N. Pescosolido, F. M. Tranquilli Leali, and J. Feher, “Age-related changes in the human retina,” Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 61–68, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Cavallotti, M. Artico, N. Pescosolido, and J. Feher, “Age-related changes in rat retina,” Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 68–75, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Owsley, G. R. Jackson, M. White, R. Feist, and D. Edwards, “Delays in rod-mediated dark adaptation in early age-related maculopathy,” Ophthalmology, vol. 108, no. 7, pp. 1196–1202, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. M. Bressler, S. B. Bressler, and S. L. Fine, “Age-related macular degeneration,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 375–413, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Bird, “Age-related macular disease,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 2–3, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. A. Zarbin, “Age-related macular degeneration: review of pathogenesis,” European Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 199–206, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Klein, B. E. K. Klein, and K. L. P. Linton, “Prevalence of age-related maculopathy. The Beaver Dam Eye Study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 933–943, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. R. Vingerling, I. Dielemans, A. Hofman et al., “The prevalence of age-related maculopathy in the Rotterdam study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 205–210, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Mitchell, W. Smith, and K. Attebo, “Prevalence of age-related maculopathy in Australia: the blue mountains eye study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 102, no. 10, pp. 1450–1460, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. A. Curcio, N. E. Medeiros, and C. L. Millican, “Photoreceptor loss in age-related macular degeneration,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1236–1249, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. A. Curcio, C. Owsley, and G. R. Jackson, “Spare the rods, save the cones in aging and age-related maculopathy,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 2015–2018, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. Villanova, E. Vernucci, B. Pucci et al., “Influence of age and physical exercise on sirtuin activity in humans,” Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 497–507, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. M. Vingolo, S. Cavarretta, D. Domanico, F. Parisi, and R. Malagola, “Microperimetric biofeedback in AMD patients,” Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback, vol. 32, no. 3-4, pp. 185–189, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. van Leeuwen, C. C. W. Klaver, J. R. Vingerling, A. Hofman, and P. T. V. M. De Jong, “The risk and natural course of age-related maculopathy: follow-up at 6 1/2 years in the Rotterdam study,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 519–526, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. L. Steinmetz, R. Haimovici, C. Jubb, F. W. Fitzke, and A. C. Bird, “Symptomatic abnormalities of dark adaptation in patients with age-related Bruch's membrane change,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 77, no. 9, pp. 549–554, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Owsley, G. R. Jackson, A. V. Cideciyan et al., “Psychophysical evidence for rod vulnerability in age-related macular degeneration,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 267–273, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. C. Bird, “Bruchs membrane change with age,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 763, pp. 166–168, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  22. L. Feeney-Burns and M. R. Ellersieck, “Age-related changes in the ultrastructure of Bruch's membrane,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 686–697, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. S. Ramrattan, T. L. van der Schaft, C. M. Mooy, W. C. de Bruijn, P. G. H. Mulder, and P. T. V. M. de Jong, “Morphometric analysis of Bruch's membrane, the choriocapillaris, and the choroid in aging,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 2857–2864, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. J. Moore, A. A. Hussain, and J. Marshall, “Age-related variation in the hydraulic conductivity of Bruch's membrane,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1290–1297, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. G. Birch, Y. Wen, K. Locke, and D. C. Hood, “Rod sensitivity, cone sensitivity, and photoreceptor layer thickness in retinal degenerative diseases,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 52, pp. 7141–7147, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  26. C. Starita, A. A. Hussain, S. Pagliarini, and J. Marshall, “Hydrodynamics of ageing Bruch's membrane: implications for macular disease,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 565–571, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Nebbioso, A. Pascarella, C. Cavallotti, and N. Pescosolido, “Monoamine oxidase enzymes and oxidative stress in the rat optic nerve: age-related changes,” International Journal of Experimental Pathology, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 401–405, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. H. P. N. Scholl, C. Bellmann, S. S. Dandekar, A. C. Bird, and F. W. Fitzke, “Photopic and scotopic fine matrix mapping of retinal areas of increased fundus autofluorescence in patients with age-related maculopathy,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 574–583, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. F. C. Delori, D. G. Goger, and C. K. Dorey, “Age-related accumulation and spatial distribution of lipofuscin in RPE of normal subjects,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1855–1866, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. N. Pescosolido and A. Stefanucci, Elettrofisiologia clinica e basi fisiologiche della visione, Fabiano Editore, Canelli (AT), Italy, 2011.
  31. B. Feigl, B. Brown, J. Lovie-Kitchin, and P. Swann, “The rod-mediated multifocal electroretinogram in aging and in early age-related maculopathy,” Current Eye Research, vol. 31, no. 7-8, pp. 635–644, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Nebbioso, R. Grenga, and P. Karavitis, “Early detection of macular changes with multifocal ERG in patients on antimalarial drug therapy,” Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 249–258, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. Nebbioso, M. L. Livani, R. D. Steigerwalt, V. Panetta, and E. Rispoli, “Retina in rheumatic diseases: standard full field and multifocal electroretinography in hydroxychloroquine retinal dysfunction,” Clinical and Experimental Optometry, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 276–283, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. E. M. Vingolo, S. Salvatore, and P. G. Limoli, “MP-1 biofeedback: luminous pattern stimulus versus acoustic biofeedback in age related macular degeneration (AMD),” Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, vol. 38, pp. 11–16, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  35. J. M. Isas, V. Luibl, L. V. Johnson et al., “Soluble and mature amyloid fibrils in drusen deposits,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1304–1310, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. K. Murakami and T. Shimizu, “Cytoplasmic superoxide radical: a possible contributing factor to intracellular Aβ oligomerization in Alzheimer disease,” Communicative and Integrative Biology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 255–258, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus